Why Would Right-Wingers Want to Allow Women to Vote?

Andrew Anglin

Guest


Take a good look at that chart.

Then ask why on earth the right-wing would ever, in any situation, support women voting.

Washington Post:

On Election Day in 1872, nearly 50 years before women gained the right to vote, Susan B. Anthony walked into a polling site in Rochester, N.Y., and cast her ballot. A federal marshal later showed up at her door to arrest her for wrongfully and willfully voting. She was ultimately tried and fined $100.

On Tuesday, the 100-year anniversary of the ratification of the 19th Amendment that granted women the right to vote, President Trump announced he would pardon Anthony.
Donald Trump: the hero of progress.

He’s dragging all of us troglodytes out of the stone age, whether we like it or not.

It’s whatever.

You see this stuff, and you know who’s responsible for it, and it’s depressing.



But it is what it is.

It doesn’t matter.

He has to get reelected, regardless.

We do not have any choice.

Continue reading...
 

Northwestguy

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
We all know the deal. Women voting basically means "extra votes in favour of whoever can brainwash women the best". It's pretty much the same as allowing 5 year olds to vote. Since we live in an age of mass media and women are by nature slothful and idle consumers who voluntarily partake in the consumption of this media the votes of women go for the most part to those running the show. The media is a cartel and pushes a single united agenda which brings us to these sad outcomes.

Women voting has been a trick to get the manipulators behind the curtain into positions of power.

 

MechaPregnantAnneFrank

A fisher of men.
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
Dabney was right.

Suffer not, thine ass of a THOT.

I would suggest the clichéd women needing to have served in the military or have done x amount of years in grueling civil work, but we'd probably just end up in the same place faster.

With a gayer military, and shittier roads.
 

jerkosovic

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
Women voting basically means "extra votes in favour of whoever can brainwash women the best".
The chart is pretty close, though. How many brainwashed women are there? Especially among older ones the problem does not seem large.

White women still went majority for Trump.

I think if women were smart they would give up their votes. Their views will be better represented by influencing their men to prioritize doing what's best for them over everything else including what's best for men or what's most fair. By removing women's votes they can still exert that influence while shutting down that bitch next door that's voting to "normalize sex work" or "welcome refugees" or whatever silly thing her podcast handlers and instathot followers tell her will get her the Likes.
 

DaveA

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
If only property-owning, tax-paying white men could vote, candidates of both parties would be falling over each other promising to slash taxes, abolish welfare and no-fault divorce, end all wars by winning them, balance the budget, and pay off the debt. And if the winners didn't do as promised, they'd all be voted out in the next election.

Before female suffrage, peacetime federal spending was three percent of GDP. Income, payroll, and sales taxes did not exist. Each state underwent a massive increase in taxation and spending starting the year it gave women the vote. Switzerland is fabulously wealthy today because it didn't allow women to vote in federal elections until 1971, and they were excluded from some local elections until 1991.
 

Harbingrr

All Hail Ashli Babbitt
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
Dabney was right.

Reading that made me wonder: is conservatism nothing more than the sands of an hourglass slipping forever downwards until the glass is turned over to start again? Is there an example in history of a libertine society slowly becoming more conservative over time, or must it always only make a jump after violent turmoil?
 

DaveA

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
Heian-era Japan (AD 794-1185) got very feminist, then there was a period of disorder when no one thought much about the status of women, and when order was restored, women were absolute male property and stayed that way until General MacArthur decreed equality in 1947, whereupon the Japanese changed overnight from the most manly and red pilled people in the world to the most cucked and emasculated, in an absurdly dramatic demonstration of culture being downstream from power.

Feminism was strong too in Iraq, then seat of the Abbasid Caliphate, until AD 861, when "government and public order collapsed, and foreign invaders overran the country. The resulting increase in confusion and violence made it unsafe for women to move unescorted in the streets, with the result that this feminist movement collapsed." Also note the great power held by women in the waning years of the Roman Empire.

If you google "history of feminism in <country>", you're led to believe that feminism did not exist until in the late 1800s, except perhaps in a mythical prehistoric golden age. They never mention that many great civilizations turned feminist before collapsing into barbarism.
 

Pandadude12345

South Carolinian: "Pandadude12345" America First!
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻
Pandadude12345
Why would right-wingers want women on a gaming forum?
I don't know, Ion, Louisa, Icon, Antonia, Cathy, Seb, G.Manalishi, and Sabrina, (who disappeared for some reason) are all quality posters, and they don't cause much trouble.
 

His name is Yeshua

Well-known member
⏰☕
When I tell a right winger he is Marxist, and he does not believe me, I ask:
"Should women have the right to vote, and is that what the founders of the USA intended, and if not, what caused that change?"

All 20th century politics is Marxist. All alternatives have been literally killed off. Marx's ideas are so ubiquitous that very few can even comprehend that alternatives exist. I am myself going through a process of stripping away Marx. It requires an entirely new identity. Matthew Henry and John Bunyan are good starting places.

Right wingers are Marxists, and so they support womens' suffrage. I have explained to right wingers, in detail with charts, that their belief is causing them great harm via voting patterns They choose Marx over self interest every time.

Constitution (Fundamental law) of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics:
ARTICLE 122. Women in the U.S.S.R. are accorded equal rights with men in all spheres of economic, state, cultural, social and political life.

The possibility of exercising these rights is ensured to women by granting them an equal right with men to work, payment for work, rest and leisure, social insurance and education, and by state protection of the interests of mother and child, pre-maternity and maternity leave with full pay, and the provision of a wide network of maternity homes, nurseries and kindergartens.
 
Last edited:

Mistaf

ℑ𝔫𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔢𝔰𝔱𝔦𝔫𝔤 𝔗𝔦𝔪𝔢𝔰 𝔗𝔯𝔞𝔳𝔢𝔩𝔢𝔯
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
Heian-era Japan (AD 794-1185) got very feminist, then there was a period of disorder when no one thought much about the status of women, and when order was restored, women were absolute male property and stayed that way until General MacArthur decreed equality in 1947, whereupon the Japanese changed overnight from the most manly and red pilled people in the world to the most cucked and emasculated, in an absurdly dramatic demonstration of culture being downstream from power.
But who was responsible for the specific article?

"Beate Sirota Gordon (October 25, 1923 – December 30, 2012), was the daughter of Russian Jewish parents who at 22 almost single-handedly wrote women’s rights into the Constitution of modern Japan."


Because of course.
 

Freedom Monk

Truth and Liberty above all else!
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
The pandoras box that has been opened by allowing woman to vote is just... Can you imagine the hysterics that will be unleashed and heard around the world once a competent government of /ourguys/ manage to take this right away from them? A lot of feminist nutjobs will be willing to die battling on this hill since female power is their whole manufactured identity.

Thanks to the nature of secret ballots we cannot even be sure that our tradthots aren't just saying they will vote how we want them to. Since it is the nature of woman to be manipulative and sneaky, they will vote in their interests (overwhelmingly liberal) and just say they voted how we wanted them too or how their husband told them too.

Democracy really dose tear our communities apart in a fake and gay power struggle instead of bringing us together.

To the best of my knowledge, we've got maybe five or six gals on here, all of whom understand they're basically the cheer squad and peanut gallery, and who really don't cause trouble
Yes, our Stormer ladies are well behaved and for that I commend them. When we finally reach our goal of taking back our western governments, I believe it is important for us to be promoting good female role models for other woman to follow. When we have proper ladies on our national media promoting healthy community values to other woman such as proper womanly conduct, the importance of respecting men as the builders of civilization, understanding that it is okay to be a woman instead of a second rate man and shaming woman who do whoredom, divorce or other antisocial activities. Normie woman will follow the female idols that we present to them when they see that they are revered and have great respect in our society as celebrity role models.

Our Stormer ladies could very well have an important place as the prototype role models for the woman of the future to be presented to the masses. In that regard I believe there is a place for them here and can even be important assets once we gain power. They are the exception to the female nature rule that we are all familiar with and it is in our interests to help this exception grow larger.

If I were on the governance board, I'd move immediately to have you banned permanently for being too immature to even be reading this forum, let alone acting in an advisory role.
Proper Gander is speaking from a place of being concerned about our community, and presumably from being on guard to not fall to female manipulation/nature. I understand his concern, and even though I have seen little evidence of the woman here being disruptive, and thus disagree with him, talking about bannings over him expressing his thoughts on how to better our cause here is quite over the top.

All 20th century politics is Marxist. All alternatives have been literally killed off. Marx's ideas are so ubiquitous that very few can even comprehend that alternatives exist
Brainwashing since birth really is a hell of a blue pill drug.
 

BigGuy4U

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽
Women, like any other group, vote for the party that DIRECTLY benefits them the most. So white women currently would rather have free abortions and feminisn(more money and power over men). These things directly benefit them in the short term. Unfortunately they arent smart enough to see the long term consequences of voting for gibs. It has to be spelled out for them in a way their weird psychology will accept it too. That's why I think Andrew has the right approach with exposing Kamala as an Indian blowjob machine.
 
Top