Why Jews have a matriarchal tradition

Duffman

Oooooh Yeaaah
Old World Underground
⏰☕
I always thought that one of the big factors was that the orthodox men spend their entire lives studying and not working, so the women become the breadwinners and end up running everything while their husbands are engrossed in learning Satan’s tricks.
All the orthodox are on welfare. They never marry in a goy civil court. They only marry within there separate legal system. Then they pump out a half dozen kids and the state view these women as single mothers, and they get all the benefits that go with that.
 

Freedom Monk

Truth and Liberty above all else!
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
All the orthodox are on welfare. They never marry in a goy civil court. They only marry within there separate legal system. Then they pump out a half dozen kids and the state view these women as single mothers, and they get all the benefits that go with that.
Lets hope these welfare rabbi's are an enormous drain on pissraels productivity as a "state".

... Oh wait, the Western world funds these jews subsidies with our tax dollars for their parasitic behavior. Never mind...
 

cu90

Well-known member
Old World Underground
⏰☕
It has to do with the fact that Jews are looking after their bitches like Muslims.
If a shiksa comes along and says „that Jew knocked me up make my son his heir“ there was some uncertainty as to whether that was true.
A jewess could be controlled much better and it could be made certain that the father of her children was also Jewish.

if a jewess was known to have been knocked up by a goy I don’t think her son would be accepted as a Jew. Maybe as a slave.
 

cu90

Well-known member
Old World Underground
⏰☕
i don’t think so. Judaism is a bride gathering cult similar to Islam. They have always jealousy been guarding their women while also taking any goy shiksa they can get their hands on.
If you go on the Wikipedia page of Jews you can see that.


„Ashkenazi men show a low level of Y-DNA diversity within each major haplogroup, which means that compared to the size of the modern population, it seems that there once was a relatively small number of men having children. This possibly results from a series of founder events and high rates of endogamywithin Europe. Despite Ashkenazi Jews representing a recently founded population in Europe, founding effects suggest that they probably derived from a large and diverse ancestral source population in the Middle East, who may have been larger than the source population from which the indigenous Europeans derived.[35]


Studies of mitochondrial DNA of Jewish populations are more recent and are still debatable.[62][h] The maternal lineages of Jewish populations, studied by looking at mitochondrial DNA, are generally more heterogeneous.[62] Scholars such as Harry Ostrer and Raphael Falk believe this may indicate that many Jewish males found new mates from European and other communities in the places where they migrated in the diaspora after fleeing ancient Israel.[63]

This phenomenon that Jews started to accept the children of goy men and Jewish women as Jews only started in the last 250 years or so. It was easier to inherit money from rich goys (British lords for example) when your grandson was also his grandson.
We can see this happening today with Donald Trump‘s children. Obviously they want his daughters to have Jewish children. But since his sons are also going to inherit some of his fortune they will encourage Jewish women to marry them.

But as I said this is a relatively recent phenomenon. For the first 2000 years since Jews entered Europe sometime after the death of Alexander they would not accept children of goy men and Jew women.
 
Last edited:

Arminius

Commander-in-chief of the haters
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️

PotstickerSwatstika

•Dissident 🙌🏻 Dumpling•
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖 💻🥩🥃
Escaped True Master
Destructive Ceremonious Master
All the orthodox are on welfare. They never marry in a goy civil court. They only marry within there separate legal system. Then they pump out a half dozen kids and the state view these women as single mothers, and they get all the benefits that go with that.
That’s the modern day situation, sure, but they’ve had this dynamic since the start, right? Had to have helped shape the matriarchal tradition...?
 

EddieBrock

Ex-Ladies' Man Bored of Low-Class Trash
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻
Don't think Jesus is down with that...
Well, it’s not ideal, but Jesus is also against divorce, and, practically speaking, which is the lesser of the evils?

There’s also the question of it being permissible before Christ, and it’s not like God is suddenly going to declare a pre-existing marital bond illegitimate, so, preexisting polygamous marriages I assume are allowed in Heaven. Meaning, it would be difficult for them to be that frowned-upon by God, Whom we can assume is a supernaturally logical being.

Moreover, it CAN’T logically be that bad unless you’re willing to suggest that God doesn’t have an ultimate grasp of morality and/or that right and wrong are fluid/malleable, which I’m COMPLETELY unwilling to do. If something was tolerable at one point, I don’t see it becoming a grievous sin at any point in the future.

It’s an issue I try not to bring up often, as there’s no need for a schism over something that I don’t think is terribly important; the thing I consider important is women being with as few men as possible, ideally one. And, given that reality, I’m simply willing to work with what I have to accomplish it.

That said, I should stop being drunk on the interwebz and giving Louisa marriage “advice” simply because I enjoy her on here enough to care about her marriage. 🤣
 

EddieBrock

Ex-Ladies' Man Bored of Low-Class Trash
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻
Yakub said:
so he just walked up to you and said 'lol i want 2 wives'

ooosh lmao yea this sounds like ludicrous women-angry BS sob stories

We do appreciate you stomer ladies tho
Certain other men have done this before. (Not naming names.) 🤣
 
Last edited:

EddieBrock

Ex-Ladies' Man Bored of Low-Class Trash
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻
That’s the modern day situation, sure, but they’ve had this dynamic since the start, right? Had to have helped shape the matriarchal tradition...?
In my experience, jewish women simply sleep around. They find the jewish boy they want to marry early and then have a semi-open on-and-off relationship with him for years, refusing to commit and engaging in their various scams and tricks more effectively by being single and flexible before they finally settle down with him when they want kids, hit the wall, or find it financially beneficial.

I can’t speak to the post-marriage situation, but their promiscuity is projected onto goy women who intermarry into jewish families, I assume, and that is the reason for the tradition. The matriarchy part is just a degenerate biological predisposition due to shitty forebears.
 

Yakub

BOY YOU GOD /\ BIG BRAINED NIBBA /\ KING
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
Escaped True Master
Well, it’s not ideal, but Jesus is also against divorce, and, practically speaking, which is the lesser of the evils?

There’s also the question of it being permissible before Christ, and it’s not like God is suddenly going to declare a pre-existing marital bond illegitimate, so, preexisting polygamous marriages I assume are allowed in Heaven. Meaning, it would be difficult for them to be that frowned-upon by God, Whom we can assume is a supernaturally logical being.

Moreover, it CAN’T logically be that bad unless you’re willing to suggest that God doesn’t have an ultimate grasp of morality and/or that right and wrong are fluid/malleable, which I’m COMPLETELY unwilling to do. If something was tolerable at one point, I don’t see it becoming a grievous sin at any point in the future.

It’s an issue I try not to bring up often, as there’s no need for a schism over something that I don’t think is terribly important; the thing I consider important is women being with as few men as possible, ideally one. And, given that reality, I’m simply willing to work with what I have to accomplish it.

That said, I should stop being drunk on the interwebz and giving Louisa marriage “advice” simply because I enjoy her on here enough to care about her marriage. 🤣
Christ would bitch-slap her ex for cheating and reproducing with another woman
 

Yakub

BOY YOU GOD /\ BIG BRAINED NIBBA /\ KING
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
Escaped True Master
I realize though that there were signs but at 16/17, I was too naive and blinded and I ignored them.
Fair enough your average 16yr old knows shit about the world, hence why dad had the final say in marriage as he has life experience.
 

Arminius

Commander-in-chief of the haters
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️
It wasn’t the fun kind.


No but I obviously don't have any knowledge of the situation, but for it to be too much "domestic violence", you'd need to have gotten injured (and you'd have to not have done something wrong to justify that).
I take the traditional European position that women ought to be beaten regularly and frequently, so I won't feel bad for a woman just because she was slapped once in a while.
 

V.I

Thanks greatest ally for this incredible bargain
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
Yakub said:
so he just walked up to you and said 'lol i want 2 wives'

Certain other men have done this before. (Not naming names.) 🤣
Lol, it takes a massive “ice age” power struggle of games that the man has to win before a woman in love will let him be non-monogamous unless they were participating in the threesomes from the get. It never just goes down without a fight (sometimes lasting months) unless they’re accomplices.
 

EddieBrock

Ex-Ladies' Man Bored of Low-Class Trash
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻
Lol, it takes a massive “ice age” power struggle of games that the man has to win before a woman in love will let him be non-monogamous unless they were participating in the threesomes from the get. It never just goes down without a fight unless they’re accomplices.
But that fight is part of the fun. 🤣
 

EddieBrock

Ex-Ladies' Man Bored of Low-Class Trash
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻


No but I obviously don't have any knowledge of the situation, but for it to be too much "domestic violence", you'd need to have gotten injured (and you'd have to not have done something wrong to justify that).
I take the traditional European position that women ought to be beaten regularly and frequently, so I won't feel bad for a woman just because she was slapped once in a while.
It just depends on whether you’re doing it to discipline her because you’re in charge and she’s misbehaving / being a cunt or to menace and terrify her because you have deep-seated antisocial issues.

The second is a LOT more rare, and Jews/feminists have largely gotten away with labeling the entire practice of the former as the latter (which, like labeling everything from a slap on the ass to rape as “sexual assault” minimizes actual rape victims) but it happens.

Some guys are ACTUALLY abusive (even 130-lb beta males and Jews) and literally just sit there singing really cringe songs about their girl being a “worthless cunt” for hours, whereupon it escalates to him dragging her by her hair and whipping her through closet doors before choking her unconscious or “raping” her at literal gunpoint (have heard these recordings and seen the videos) in a gay attempt to terrify a woman like that tranny faggot in Silence of the Lambs (why would you even need a gun if you were even as strong as a 12-year-old boy - total weak, antisocial faggotry). It makes sadism look gay and cringe and I hate this kind of faggot - absolutely ruins otherwise redeemable women by turning them into feminist sluts, at least in the few experiences I have firsthand knowledge of.

These days it’s tough to do the legitimate former without being accused of the illegitimate latter, and women will virtually always play the victim if they can get away with it, but I give Louisa the benefit of the doubt here.
 
Last edited:

Arminius

Commander-in-chief of the haters
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️
It just depends on whether you’re doing it to discipline her because you’re in charge and she’s misbehaving / being a cunt or to menace and terrify her because you have deep-seated antisocial issues.

The second is a LOT more rare, and Jews/feminists have largely gotten away with labeling the entire practice of the former as the latter (which, like labeling everything from a slap on the ass to rape as “sexual assault” minimizes actual rape victims) but it happens.

Some guys are ACTUALLY abusive (even 130-lb beta males and Jews) and literally just sit there singing really cringe songs about their girl being a “worthless cunt” for hours, whereupon it escalates to him dragging her by her hair and whipping her through closet doors before choking her unconscious or “raping” her at literal gunpoint (have heard these recordings and seen the videos) in a gay attempt to terrify a woman like that tranny faggot in Silence of the Lambs (why would you even need a gun if you were even as strong as a 12-year-old boy - total weak, antisocial faggotry). It makes sadism look gay and cringe and I hate this kind of faggot - absolutely ruins otherwise redeemable women by turning them into feminist sluts, at least in the few experiences I have firsthand knowledge of.

These days it’s tough to do the legitimate former without being accused of the illegitimate latter, and women will virtually always play the victim if they can get away with it, but I give Louisa the benefit of the doubt here.
Given how she has been caught lying in this very thread, I don't.

But what you described, I also said is not good. Beatings that are too harsh are not productive. However, there does not need to be a specific reason for the beating. You can also beat her to prevent her from stepping out of line in the future. This was common practice for the history of Europe up until Jewish feminist agitation turned our entire civilization upside down a bit less than two hundred years ago. Only someone who is not right in the head purposefully damages his own property without good justification, however. But beating a woman to terrify her is not gay, women should be afraid of the consequences of misstepping. You should just not overdo it.
 

onpoint

god of the serengheti
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
Given how she has been caught lying in this very thread, I don't.

But what you described, I also said is not good. Beatings that are too harsh are not productive. However, there does not need to be a specific reason for the beating. You can also beat her to prevent her from stepping out of line in the future. This was common practice for the history of Europe up until Jewish feminist agitation turned our entire civilization upside down a bit less than two hundred years ago. Only someone who is not right in the head purposefully damages his own property without good justification, however. But beating a woman to terrify her is not gay, women should be afraid of the consequences of misstepping. You should just not overdo it.
If you absolutely have to Mike Tyson some hoe , just give her a solar plexus shot and let her collapse. She'll learn.
 

EddieBrock

Ex-Ladies' Man Bored of Low-Class Trash
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻
Given how she has been caught lying in this very thread, I don't.

But what you described, I also said is not good. Beatings that are too harsh are not productive. However, there does not need to be a specific reason for the beating. You can also beat her to prevent her from stepping out of line in the future. This was common practice for the history of Europe up until Jewish feminist agitation turned our entire civilization upside down a bit less than two hundred years ago. Only someone who is not right in the head purposefully damages his own property without good justification, however. But beating a woman to terrify her is not gay, women should be afraid of the consequences of misstepping. You should just not overdo it.
And I get your point - I just mean “terrify” in the sense of a pure sociopathic and antisocial rush in the same vein as a spree killer, as opposed to “putting the fear of God into her” and achieving something productive or rewarding. 🤣

Your woman shouldn’t live in fear that even when she is behaving, you’re likely to engage in extreme violence just to give yourself cheap thrills at her expense.
 

Louisa_Reese

TradThot
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
Given how she has been caught lying in this very thread, I don't.

But what you described, I also said is not good. Beatings that are too harsh are not productive. However, there does not need to be a specific reason for the beating. You can also beat her to prevent her from stepping out of line in the future. This was common practice for the history of Europe up until Jewish feminist agitation turned our entire civilization upside down a bit less than two hundred years ago. Only someone who is not right in the head purposefully damages his own property without good justification, however. But beating a woman to terrify her is not gay, women should be afraid of the consequences of misstepping. You should just not overdo it.
You can all stop speculating. I was trying to end the derailing of this thread but since you guys won't let it go, let me clarify:

I do not claim to be a victim of "domestic violence" and my husband never beat me. He was violent but never really injured me, except once when he didn't realize his own strength, so it was pretty much an accident.

The problem was just how unhealthy it was to fight like we did (at the end of the marriage) in front of the kids. He scared them when he would fly off the handle and break down doors and choke me to unconsciousness. I did not deserve this treatment and I went out of my way to walk on eggshells because I knew he was unstable when drinking and on drugs, so I didn't push.

Also, I have not lied in this thread. Saying I "never worked" implied a "real job" since it was in relation to job experience I could use now to get a good paying job. Fat is subjective, even when I was a bit overweight (for only a year after my last baby) most people would probably still not call me fat. I'm just used to being thin so it felt fat to me.

Now, can we keep the thread on topic please?
 
Top