Why I Cringe When Someone Tells Me They Identify as a National Socialist

Andrew Anglin

๐Ÿ ๐ŸŽ€ ๐“‚๐’ถ๐“ˆ๐“‰๐‘’๐“‡ ๐’ธ๐’ฝ๐’พ๐‘’๐’ป ๐ŸŽ€ ๐Ÿ
Old World Underground
๐Ÿ‘‘
๐Ÿธ Citizen of the Internet ๐Ÿธ
๐ŸŽฉ
โฐโ˜•๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฝ๐Ÿšฟ๐Ÿช’๐Ÿ‹๐Ÿป๐Ÿฅ“
maxresdefault (81).jpg

Someone in the thread the neo-Nazi freakout at the tiki bar was asking about whether or not it is good to identify as a "National Socialist."

I've gone through all of this many times before, but I couldn't find any of those instances (probably on the old forum RIP), so I thought it good to

My question is directed to everyone, not specifically the quote.

I consider myself a so called "Nazi". A National Socialist.

I'm English, so the Daily Stormer's 'American Nationalism' does not apply to me. I believe NS is the best political system, and I believe Hitler did nothing wrong, he developed a functional economic and political system, with cultural policies that ensured the healthy continuation and survival of European peoples.

So what distinguishes me from a "neo-Nazi"? I do not, and would not have Swastika tattoos, or Sonnenrad tattoos. There is nothing about my appearance to indicate my political beliefs. On the surface I am a normie wage cuck with a good job, a Trad Aryan waifu, children, German car.

Are 'Nazis' OK? Ostentatious neo-Nazis are obviously the cringey and embarrassing contingent.

Can anyone clarify this for me?
Lets not get sidetracked, We're talking about neo-Nazis and whether Nietzsche is responsible for today's leading and dominant ideals. You can argue obtuse parallels, but he isn't an originator of any of today's leading ideals, also known as GloboHomo.

obtuse parallels
All there is ever going to be is obtuse parallels. This whole concept of a genealogy of morals or Marx's ideologies is really just a load of nonsense. It's just mental masturbation to attempt to draw these lineages of thought patterns through history and try to make connections with the development of societies and so on. Everything that people actually do in real life they do for practical reasons stemming from biological drives. That was the case until the absurdities of ideology theory were foisted upon us by Marx, and people now are crippling their own ability to act rationally in order to chase the spooks of utopianism.

We got rid of Christianity, now we have white guilt. Nietzsche's theory that ideas were shaping morals has been proved wrong, in total. The "slave morals" of guilt and penitence are biologically hardwired into white people. As soon as we were "liberated" from Christianity, we formed a new and terribly destructive bizarro world Anti-Christianity based on seeking forgiveness from brown people and Jews. In this religion, we do not have Christ to cleanse us of our sin, so we must continue begging forgiveness until we die.

The only actual relevance of ideology is the way believing in the validity of ideology affects people's behavior. That appears to have been the point of it, when Marx sold people on the fundamentally absurd idea that modern social structures were the result of complex historical patterns of thought, and that corrections to the patterns of thought would lead to a perfect society.

Every ideology is Marxist, whether it is conservatism, liberalism, communism, globalism, anarchism or libertarianism, because they all follow the idea put forward by Marx that societies are structured around ideas and that the perfect pattern of ideas can lead to a perfect society. Thus, they say, instead of responding to things practically, you must use the correct pattern of ideas, and run any decision you have before you through that structure. If you do that enough times, the theory goes, you will create a utopia.

(Note that our rulers do not actually follow an ideology themselves. They are currently using libertarianism to explain why Trump shouldn't be allowed to send feds to Portland. They used fiscal conservatism to explain why Trump can't build a wall. What they actually care about exclusively is power, and they understand that ideology does not lead to power but that there is power in manipulating people by foisting a belief in ideologies on them.)

At this point in my life I cringe hard when someone says "I'm a National Socialist." It's not because I think it means tattoos and drunken brawls at the Tiki Bar, it's because I understand exactly what it is: it means you're attempting to form a utopian ideology out of political and social events that took place in 1930s Germany. Hitler would have cringed just as hard as I'm cringing at the thought of transforming the actions that he took for practical reasons in the 1930s into a Marxist type ideology 100 years later. Hitler did not create an ideology. There is no ideology of National Socialism. There was a political system of National Socialism in 1930s Germany that was made to fit the culture of 1930s Germany. This was implemented using practical action. Hitler did not act on ideology. If you go through and look at what he did, the core pattern you will find in all of it is that he acted on practicality. This, of course, is what all political leaders in history have always done before we got hit with the scourge of ideology and every political group started adopting these structures of thought which exist outside of reality to serve as a framework for decisions.

The practical reality of Nazism was that it was a reaction to communism, and any reactionary movement is going to have a degree of parallels with the thing it is reacting against. So I can see how someone could look at Hitler's Germany and try to twist it into an ideology. But every action he took was simply about doing what he thought was best for Germany, and he did it directly, without needing to run it through a systematized super-structure of ideas first. If you try to break it down into an ideology, you're going to end up with a lot of nonsense. For example: you will be imagining that military regalia is for whatever reason important in its own right, which is obviously wrong, but which is something that all neo-Nazis believe. Because there isn't an actual "National Socialist ideology," because Hitler did not design an ideology, if you try to make an ideology out of it, you end up creating a kind of cargo cult.

Mein Kampf is almost entirely about contemporary German politics. Hitler laboriously went through and outlined practical solutions that he saw to all of these different problems that the country was facing after the first war. In fact, he denounces politicians for seeking out ideology as he trudges through complicated practical solutions.

From a bit on foreign policy:

It is just this circle which is beginning to-day to divert our foreign policy into most disastrous directions and turn it away from the task of promoting the real interests of the nation. Seeing that they do this in order to serve their own fantastic ideologies, I feel myself obliged to take the greatest pains in laying before my own colleagues a clear exposition of the most important problem in our foreign policy, namely, our position in relation to Russia. I shall deal with it, as thoroughly as may be necessary to make it generally understood and as far as the limits of this book permit. [...]
He just goes on and on and on like that, but that passage is apt, as it shows him pointing out the way people chasing ideologies are failing to manage practical considerations.

You say you don't want to be a nationalist because you're not American. Well, British people have a nation too. Britain is a nation. Everyone who is associated with the right-wing should be a nationalist, first and foremost. Nationalism is not a Marxist vision of utopia. When a person says "I'm a nationalist," he is not presenting himself as a follower of an ideology, he is saying that he believes in doing what is best for his nation. Hitler was a nationalist. "National Socialism" was simply a branding for German nationalism under Adolf Hitler.

If someone was actually primarily concerned with following Adolf Hitler (which I do not think should be anyone's primary concern, but assuming that it is), what he would do is not attempt to apply Marxist ideology theory to Nazism and make himself into a "National Socialist." What he would instead do is do what Hitler himself actually did, which was look at his nation and figure out how to get power and use that power to put the nation on the correct course. The correct course is always fundamentally based on the ability of the state to make it possible for people to have happiness, peace and freedom, so they are able to maintain healthy families and raise productive and healthy children.

We know what is going on, we know what we need to do to fix it. I don't think anyone here is legitimately confused about this, so anyone who is attempting to identify themselves uniquely as an individual by saying, "I have a special position on this that is different from others" is doing it for personal ego-oriented reasons. This entire thing of people feeling as though they need to identify themselves as being a unique individual because of the specialness of their ideology is a mind cancer, and it doesn't belong in an existential struggle for survival.

None of our problems are ideological. All of our problems are practical. We have real people, in real life, trying to exterminate us. The time for using politics as a hobby is over. This is all really happening and it is happening now, and we need to deal with it. We do not need to discuss ideas. All of our ideas are sound. That discussion is already over.

We should all be working to get power so that we can implement an agenda that is good for our nation - whether that nation is America, Britain or any other nation. We not only do not have the time to play these mind-games with ideologies, it is actually actively hurting us, creating a platform for right-wingers to argue with each other and to foment confusion. If we understand what ideology is, we should all be able to avoid it, and get out of this weird trap that has been laid for us.

I don't need to call anyone out here. I'm sure no one is actively saying to himself that he is identifying as a National Socialist because he wants to feel unique. Further, there isn't anything fundamentally wrong with a drive to want to be unique. But, if you are going around talking about how you're a National Socialist, you need to analyze your own self, and figure out what exactly you think you have to gain by adopting something you perceive as an ideology instead of simply working towards the obvious goals of solving all of these obvious problems, most of which have pretty obvious solutions.

For some people, I think the problems seem too big to solve, so it is easier to mess around with this ideology stuff instead of confronting things head-on and saying, "okay, we know what the problems are, we know how to solve them, now it is time to start the work of actually doing it." If there is some perceived ideological thing that needs corrected first, that allows people to procrastinate. What I saw with the tailspin of the old Alt-Right was that people felt good during the period where they were discovering things, which for a lot of people was between 2015-17, and once those things were all discovered, they didn't feel they were up to the task of actually doing anything, so instead they went into a quest for the perfect ideology, which allowed them to return into a mindset of thinking rather than doing. As @sp_ has documented, this led to some extremely bizarre results: virtually everyone who was involved in the old Alt-Right, save yours truly, is currently promoting third worldism, communism, Islam, costumed neo-Nazism, destroying America, and a whole load of other lunatic ideological nonsense. At this point, they're just going around looking for things to add to their ideology as kook would add bumper stickers to his VW bug.

1960s-beatle.jpg

I gather that the person I'm responding to is a teenager, but this is of course a general post to everyone who is experiencing this mental problem. Maybe you have other reasons for believing in ideology theory. I don't know. What I do know is that whatever your reason for doing it, it is wrong, and you are wasting your own time and the time of other people in a time when we do not have time to waste.

Most people probably aren't really going to understand any of this right off the bat, so they should probably spend some time thinking about it.
 

Staufer

Vril Society Member
Old World Underground
๐Ÿธ Citizen of the Internet ๐Ÿธ
โฐโ˜•๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฝ๐Ÿšฟ๐Ÿช’๐Ÿ‹๐Ÿป
Amen.

"National Socialism" was just a brand name to reach out to as many people as possible, because most Nationalist parties at that time were aristocratic or bourgeois and "Socialism" should appeal to the common people. They just wanted a name that everyone could accept. Hitler didn't wrote Mein Kampf as "Introduction to the Doctrine of National Socialism" but as his own manifesto.

The idea of National Socialism being some unique world view was created by Jews and leftists after WWII to demonize Hitler and the Third Reich.

And yeah, when you look at NS as some kind of concrete ideology you will end up with a cargo cult where superficial things like having a swastika flag and wearing uniforms become super important.

Or it leads to spergish online discussions where people argue if Hitler was actually a Capitalist or actually an economical Socialist.
You can debunk both sides pretty easily simply by quoting Hitler, because non of that autistic shit really matters when you're a nationalist - and Hitler knew this.
 

COMMANDER COLUCCI

COMMANDER OF THE NATIONAL SOCIALIST MOVEMENT 14/88
Cave Beast
โฐ
THE TRUE IDEALS OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM ARE BEATIN', EATIN', AND COMPETIN' (IN THE NATIONALS EVERY YEAR - GO KISSIMMEE, BEAT DETROIT).

WHAT HAVE YOU DONE FOR THE WHITE POWER CAUSE? WE'RE OUT THERE ALMOST EVERY WEEK, HOLDING OUR MIGHTY SWASTIKA AND/OR ODAL RUNE HIGH, LETTING PANTYFA KNOW THAT THEIR DAYS ARE NUMBERED!



14/88
 

MechaPregnantAnneFrank

A fisher of men.
Old World Underground
๐Ÿ‘‘
๐Ÿธ Citizen of the Internet ๐Ÿธ
๐ŸŽฉ
โฐโ˜•๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฝ๐Ÿšฟ๐Ÿช’๐Ÿ‹๐Ÿป๐Ÿฅ“๐Ÿ’ปโ›ช๏ธ๐Ÿ–
THE TRUE IDEALS OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM ARE BEATIN', EATIN', AND COMPETIN' (IN THE NATIONALS EVERY YEAR - GO KISSIMMEE, BEAT DETROIT).

WHAT HAVE YOU DONE FOR THE WHITE POWER CAUSE? WE'RE OUT THERE ALMOST EVERY WEEK, HOLDING OUR MIGHTY SWASTIKA AND/OR ODAL RUNE HIGH, LETTING PANTYFA KNOW THAT THEIR DAYS ARE NUMBERED!



14/88
You make a good argument.
 

wumao

Well-known member
Old World Underground
๐Ÿธ Citizen of the Internet ๐Ÿธ
โฐโ˜•๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฝ๐Ÿšฟ๐Ÿช’
THE TRUE IDEALS OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM ARE BEATIN', EATIN', AND COMPETIN' (IN THE NATIONALS EVERY YEAR - GO KISSIMMEE, BEAT DETROIT).

WHAT HAVE YOU DONE FOR THE WHITE POWER CAUSE? WE'RE OUT THERE ALMOST EVERY WEEK, HOLDING OUR MIGHTY SWASTIKA AND/OR ODAL RUNE HIGH, LETTING PANTYFA KNOW THAT THEIR DAYS ARE NUMBERED!



14/88
Are those the federal agents the Detroit police chief said they are working with?
 

wumao

Well-known member
Old World Underground
๐Ÿธ Citizen of the Internet ๐Ÿธ
โฐโ˜•๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฝ๐Ÿšฟ๐Ÿช’
People that identify as NS seem to always be pushing for socialism. Even Hitler tried to get people into public housing, but the Germans didn't play along. Probably because of biological reasons.

The only way the "elites" could get people to go along with their unnatural commie Utopia is to change their biology and drug them.
 
Last edited:

AlkisTHC

Active member
Cave Beast
โฐ
A problem with the American national identity is that blacks,spicks,gooks and muzzies consider themselves American. I have some family in the US and they say they are Greek American. No you retard you are not American you are Greek, stop the conversion of your nationality. Also regarding national socialism yes it is not an ideology however most of us who sympathise with Hitler's actions and ideas about race want to have a sense of unity or a means to identify like-minded individuals however I have not really contemplated that before and this sparked some interest regarding what exactly is ideology.
 

Oystein

Great Dane
Old World Underground
๐Ÿธ Citizen of the Internet ๐Ÿธ
โฐโ˜•๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฝ
THE TRUE IDEALS OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM ARE BEATIN', EATIN', AND COMPETIN' (IN THE NATIONALS EVERY YEAR - GO KISSIMMEE, BEAT DETROIT).

WHAT HAVE YOU DONE FOR THE WHITE POWER CAUSE? WE'RE OUT THERE ALMOST EVERY WEEK, HOLDING OUR MIGHTY SWASTIKA AND/OR ODAL RUNE HIGH, LETTING PANTYFA KNOW THAT THEIR DAYS ARE NUMBERED!

Indeed. National Socialism is the Eternal Truth derived from Natural Law. The Swastika and the red, white and black colors strike fear into the enemies of the Aryan people. If we compromise on National Socialism, they will just call us "Nazis" anyway. Also, we will inevitably be forced to compromise and LIE on other issues, until we are bourgeoisie movement of DEGENERATES.

sandhed.png

sandhed-heilhitler.png
 

Boing

Light From Darkness
Old World Underground
๐Ÿธ Citizen of the Internet ๐Ÿธ
โฐโ˜•๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฝ๐Ÿšฟ๐Ÿช’
But, if you are going around talking about how you're a National Socialist, you need to analyze your own self, and figure out what exactly you think you have to gain by adopting something you perceive as an ideology instead of simply working towards the obvious goals of solving all of these obvious problems, most of which have pretty obvious solutions.
100%. All this intellectual masturbation garbage gets everyone nowhere. Everybody already knows what the problems are. Practical Action in real life counts, not p---g around on philosophy sessions.
 

sp_

Well-known weeaboo
Cave Beast
โฐโ˜•
its been a while since I read any of his works but iirc Hitler explained at length that "national socialism" was a means to an end to 1) create a naturally ordered, traditional society, 2) provide a solid basis for the public to rally around his 'racalist world-concept' (which was different to an ideology) to oppose the "international world-concept" -- which in his day was basically exclusive expressed by marxists, since the western liberals were equally as racist as hitler, perhaps moreso in many instances (especially the Brits).

his world-concept was a philosophical worldview based on things that are eternally true and have been found throughout every successful civilization in history (before the French Revolution, anyway).

he described aspects of the party ideology (ie the 25 point plan) as being a practical means by which to implement his racialist world-concept and unite the nation. he also described Maxism as being the practical process of transforming the international world-concept into a powerful 'faith' that was capable of propagating said world-concept.

Hitler was very adamant that a world-concept could only be brought into reality via a political tool (i.e., the NS party). I think he would be the first guy to tell nationalists of this age that they need to create their own tool for their own circumstance to implement the racialist (I would say 'nationalist') world-concept

iirc, the first (or second, but I think first) chapter of part 2 of mein kampf is where he explains this stuff.

TL;DR: in very simple terms NS was a practical tool for Hitler to implement his racialist world-concept, which was a philosophy that existed above and beyond the party

(Note that our rulers do not actually follow an ideology themselves. They are currently using libertarianism to explain why Trump shouldn't be allowed to send feds to Portland. They used fiscal conservatism to explain why Trump can't build a wall. What they actually care about exclusively is power, and they understand that ideology does not lead to power but that there is power in manipulating people by foisting a belief in ideologies on them.)
this is an important thing that a lot of people completely ignore, which leads to stupid shit like people claiming that overtly marxoid collectivist racial grievance social policies are actually "neo-liberal individualism." the elites don't need ideology (which is a utility) because they've already secured total global dominance. plus they've already got their weird kabbalah jew stuff, which is their world-concept

edit:
I disagree with regards* to Slave Morality being an inherent aspect of our racial makeup. I think Nietzsche was right about Slave Morality being ideologically derived, but wrong about it stemming directly/entirely from Christianity. Protestant Anglos conquered the entire planet and did things like strap brown people to cannons. Christian societies invented scientific racism. Christian societies before the French Revolution even maintained an identical Caste system to the old Indo-European societies and had a sense of hierarchical Natural Order.

IMO, 'Slave Morality' is basically just "stuff that jews promote in your society to disrupt the natural order by turning the lower classes against the higher" (which is something that Nietzsche said too). Other than that, good post, I agree
 
Last edited:

Coltraine

America First
Old World Underground
๐Ÿ‘‘
๐Ÿธ Citizen of the Internet ๐Ÿธ
๐ŸŽฉ
โฐโ˜•๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฝ๐Ÿšฟ๐Ÿช’๐Ÿ‹๐Ÿป๐Ÿฅ“
Damn, after reading this article, I am more than anything feeling like I need to develop my writing skills.
Especially this part in the beginning:

This whole concept of a genealogy of morals or Marx's ideologies is really just a load of nonsense. It's just mental masturbation to attempt to draw these lineages of thought patterns through history and try to make connections with the development of societies and so on. Everything that people actually do in real life they do for practical reasons stemming from biological drives. That was the case until the absurdities of ideology theory were foisted upon us by Marx, and people now are crippling their own ability to act rationally in order to chase the spooks of utopianism.
We got rid of Christianity, now we have white guilt. Nietzsche's theory that ideas were shaping morals has been proved wrong, in total. The "slave morals" of guilt and penitence are biologically hardwired into white people. As soon as we were "liberated" from Christianity, we formed a new and terribly destructive bizarro world Anti-Christianity based on seeking forgiveness from brown people and Jews. In this religion, we do not have Christ to cleanse us of our sin, so we must continue begging forgiveness until we die.
The only actual relevance of ideology is the way believing in the validity of ideology affects people's behavior. That appears to have been the point of it, when Marx sold people on the fundamentally absurd idea that modern social structures were the result of complex historical patterns of thought, and that corrections to the patterns of thought would lead to a perfect society.
Every ideology is Marxist, whether it is conservatism, liberalism, communism, globalism, anarchism or libertarianism, because they all follow the idea put forward by Marx that societies are structured around ideas and that the perfect pattern of ideas can lead to a perfect society. Thus, they say, instead of responding to things practically, you must use the correct pattern of ideas, and run any decision you have before you through that structure. If you do that enough times, the theory goes, you will create a utopia.
(Note that our rulers do not actually follow an ideology themselves. They are currently using libertarianism to explain why Trump shouldn't be allowed to send feds to Portland. They used fiscal conservatism to explain why Trump can't build a wall. What they actually care about exclusively is power, and they understand that ideology does not lead to power but that there is power in manipulating people by foisting a belief in ideologies on them.)
This is great stuff that I already have copied and saved for potential use later on.
 

BootlessM22

Well-known member
Cave Beast
๐Ÿธ Citizen of the Internet ๐Ÿธ
โฐโ˜•๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฝ๐Ÿšฟ๐Ÿช’
I don't like how there is still a lot of ambiguity among a lot of folks between fascism and natsoc.
But, I did read Gentile and Mussolini's works, and I do like them a lot.
So, I guess inherently we are all a bit fashy. But not all fascists are natsoc. But, there are elements of natsoc that are objectively pretty nice.
At the end of the day, all we desire is a homogeneous society with a strong emphasis on family values and work ethic. This society will bring about a new future for mankind. That is what I believe, and I'm sure most will be hard-pressed to find issue with those words.
 

Mike Sinclair

Herman Cain's ashy ghost
Cave Beast
๐Ÿธ Citizen of the Internet ๐Ÿธ
โฐโ˜•๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฝ๐Ÿšฟ๐Ÿช’
For some people, I think the problems seem too big to solve, so it is easier to mess around with this ideology stuff instead of confronting things head-on
This is a big part of it right here. What do we do? People either don't know or it seems insurmountable. Putting a label on what you are helps someone feel like they're "doing something".
 

pen-meister

Well-known member
Old World Underground
๐Ÿธ Citizen of the Internet ๐Ÿธ
โฐโ˜•๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฝ๐Ÿšฟ๐Ÿช’๐Ÿ‹๐Ÿป๐Ÿฅ“
I still love watching video w/music clips of late 1930s Germany in their halcyon years -- with SS troops marching and exuberant multitudes waving swastika flags bubbling over with happiness, hope and unity and love of their Fรผhrer.
 

TTG

Well-known member
Cave Beast
โฐโ˜•๐Ÿšฌ
yea it's great branding that you want a country where the people do the best for the nation, nation meaning group of people not land borders, and a government that harnessing this national power to provide social benefits to the citizens.

national socialism brings about this thought when you think of the words.

too bad you can't use it nowadays cause it has bad connotations with it.

i totally agree ideology is toxic and practicality is king, the problem is most people today are not practical and shouldn't be alive but are due to mass production, mass agriculture, easy to follow obedience favored system, they are alive and they pass on this impracticality throughout their lives and the things they interact with. it's a sort of cancer that you can't get rid of without killing some cells. nature used to do it for us so we didn't need to worry about the morals of it.
 

Paladin Prime

xxAKA Lex Luthorxx. Only in death does duty end.
๐Ÿธ Citizen of the Internet ๐Ÿธ
โฐโ˜•๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฝ๐Ÿšฟ๐Ÿช’๐Ÿ‹๐Ÿป
"...Marxism itself systematically aims at delivering the world into the hands of the Jews...

...Over against all this, the vรถlkisch concept of the world recognizes that the primordial racial elements are of the greatest significance for mankind. In principle, the State is looked upon only as a means to an end and this end is the conservation of the racial characteristics of mankind. Therefore on the vรถlkisch principle we cannot admit that one race is equal to another. By recognizing that they are different, the vรถlkisch concept separates mankind into races of superior and inferior quality. On the basis of this recognition it feels bound in conformity with the eternal Will that dominates the universe, to postulate the victory of the better and stronger and the subordination of the inferior and weaker. And so it pays homage to the truth that the principle underlying all Nature's operations is the aristocratic principle and it believes that this law holds good even down to the last individual organism. It selects individual values from the mass and thus operates as an organizing principle, whereas Marxism acts as a disintegrating solvent. The vรถlkisch belief holds that humanity must have its ideals, because ideals are a necessary condition of human existence itself. But, on the other hand, it denies that an ethical ideal has the right to prevail if it endangers the existence of a race that is the standard-bearer of a higher ethical ideal. For in a world which would be composed of mongrels and negroids all ideals of human beauty and nobility and all hopes of an idealized future for our humanity would be lost forever.

On this planet of ours human culture and civilization are indissolubly bound up with the presence of the Aryan. If he should be exterminated or subjugated, then the dark shroud of a new barbarian era would enfold the earth.


To undermine the existence of human culture by exterminating its founders and custodians would be an execrable crime in the eyes of those who believe that the folk-idea lies at the basis of human existence. Whoever would dare to raise a profane hand against that highest image of God among His creatures would sin against the bountiful Creator of this marvel and would collaborate in the expulsion from Paradise.

Hence the folk concept of the world is in profound accord with Nature's will; because it restores the free play of the forces which will lead the race through stages of sustained reciprocal education towards a higher type, until finally the best portion of mankind will possess the earth and will be free to work in every domain all over the world and even reach spheres that lie outside the earth.

We all feel that in the distant future many may be faced with problems which can be solved only by a superior race of human beings, a race destined to become master of all the other peoples and which will have at its disposal the means and resources of the whole world..."
- Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. II, Chapter 1
 

Mike Sinclair

Herman Cain's ashy ghost
Cave Beast
๐Ÿธ Citizen of the Internet ๐Ÿธ
โฐโ˜•๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฝ๐Ÿšฟ๐Ÿช’
Also I do fucking love the swastika. There is a very good reason Hitler chose the swastika.
It gives me warm fuzzies too, but I put it away years ago. It mostly attracts an anti-social element, not the good, normal people we want. I fly the American flag now and look very normal, respectable even.
 

Little Shitpost Buddha

We are all in this together
Cave Beast
โฐโ˜•๐Ÿšฌ
Fascism simply means "common sense" for any member of a nation that upholds the values of Catholic social order, or any of its non-Christian counterparts (Japanese Shinto). More narrowly, fascism means the masculine prerogative - strength, organization, state power, command, control, interference, action. Fascism is a term which in fact ages quite well, as everything else which Italians had invented.
 

BillGud

They call me Cave,
Cave Beast
๐Ÿธ Citizen of the Internet ๐Ÿธ
โฐโ˜•๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฝ๐Ÿšฟ๐Ÿช’
Iโ€™m full blown Norwegian & German and I donโ€™t identify with either. Iโ€™m blond haired, blued eyed, and identify as an American. To wave a flag, any flag that doesnโ€™t represent your birthplace, your roots, your human stain on its very soil is so foreign to me it mine as well be in another world.

Appropriating something that literally has nothing to do with you makes you seem lost and confused. The 40โ€™s are over the โ€œNazisโ€ lost. Itโ€™s 2020 and time for an American movement.

Fargin nazi costumes are literally the equivalent of donning a football jersey.

MURICA
 
Last edited:

Deleted member

Guest
(Note that our rulers do not actually follow an ideology themselves. They are currently using libertarianism to explain why Trump shouldn't be allowed to send feds to Portland. They used fiscal conservatism to explain why Trump can't build a wall. What they actually care about exclusively is power, and they understand that ideology does not lead to power but that there is power in manipulating people by foisting a belief in ideologies on them.)
The problem with this is that you have to have your own lexicon in order to avoid being poisoned by your enemy's lexicon, which is what Jews have successfully accomplished with "racism", "whiteness", "privilege", etc.

Inevitably, people label these lexicons as ideologies, as a shortcut way of navigating through different content. People then draw connections to historical lexicons to reach wider insights, or perhaps just forcefully attempt to make sense of mental constructs that have no relevance outside their brain-sacks.

This is all inevitable and automatic, so there is no use making a big deal out of this outside of a couple of clear conclusions on the human condition:

- human biodiversity is not only present between races but inside races
- different human biologies will manifest in different lexicons
- the purpose of all lexicons is to gain power
 

Paladin Prime

xxAKA Lex Luthorxx. Only in death does duty end.
๐Ÿธ Citizen of the Internet ๐Ÿธ
โฐโ˜•๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฝ๐Ÿšฟ๐Ÿช’๐Ÿ‹๐Ÿป
The problem with this is that you have to have your own lexicon in order to avoid being poisoned by your enemy's lexicon, which is what Jews have successfully accomplished with "racism", "whiteness", "privilege", etc.

Inevitably, people label these lexicons as ideologies, as a shortcut way of navigating through different content. People then draw connections to historical lexicons to reach wider insights, or perhaps just forcefully attempt to make sense of mental constructs that have no relevance outside their brain-sacks.

This is all inevitable and automatic, so there is no use making a big deal out of this outside of a couple of clear conclusions on the human condition:

- human biodiversity is not only present between races but inside races
- different human biologies will manifest in different lexicons
- the purpose of all lexicons is to gain power
Nietzsche. Bah.

His most frequently quoted statement is something like, "anything that does not kill me makes me stronger.". That statement is totally false. There are many fates worse than death, many of which can severely weaken a person physically, mentally, emotionally, and/or spiritually.
 
Top