WHO admits to the PCR test scam one hour after Biden sworn in

ItsAlwaysSomething

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»

Were the 'conspiracy theorists' just proven right about the "fake rescue plan" for COVID?

Did the 'science-deniers' just get confirmation that it was political after all?


The short answer to both of these questions regarding the COVID-19 'casedemic' and the fallacy of asymptomatic PCR testing is YES and YES!

We have detailed the controversy surrounding America's COVID "casedemic" and the misleading results of the PCR test and its amplification procedure in great detail over the past few months.

As a reminder, "cycle thresholds" (Ct) are the level at which widely used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test can detect a sample of the COVID-19 virus. The higher the number of cycles, the lower the amount of viral load in the sample; the lower the cycles, the more prevalent the virus was in the original sample.


Numerous epidemiological experts have argued that cycle thresholds are an important metric by which patients, the public, and policymakers can make more informed decisions about how infectious and/or sick an individual with a positive COVID-19 test might be. However, as JustTheNews reports, health departments across the country are failing to collect that data.

In fact, as far back as October, we brought the world's attention to the COVID-19 "casedemic" and the disturbing reality of high-cycle threshold PCR tests being worse than useless as indicators of COVID-19 "sickness". PJMedia's Stacey Lennox said at the time:

Biden will issue national standards, like the plexiglass barriers in restaurants he spoke about during the debate, and pressure governors to implement mask mandates using the federal government’s financial leverage.
Some hack at the CDC or FDA will issue new guidance lowering the Ct the labs use
, and cases will magically start to fall.
In reality, the change will only eliminate false positives, but most Americans won’t know that.
Good old Uncle Joe will be the hero, even though it is Deep-State actors in the health bureaucracies who won’t solve a problem with testing they have been aware of for months. TDS is a heck of a drug.
And now, as Lennox explains in detail below, we have been proved 100% correct as less than one hour after President Biden's inauguration, the WHO proved us right.

In August of last year, The New York Times published an article stating that as many as 90% of COVID-19 tests in three states were not indicative of active illness. In other words, they were picking up viral debris incapable of causing infection or being transmitted because the cycle threshold (Ct) of the PCR testing amplified the sample too many times.

Labs in the United States were using a Ct of 37-40. Epidemiologists interviewed at the time said a Ct of around 30 was probably more appropriate. This means the CDC’s COVID-19 test standards for the PCR test would pick up an excessive number of false positives. The Times report noted the CDC’s own data suggested the PCR did not detect live virus over a Ct of 33. The reporter also noted that clinicians were not receiving the Ct value as part of the test results.

Yet a PCR test instruction document from the CDC that had been revised five times as of July 13, 2020, specified testing and interpretation of the test using a Ct of 40. On September 28, 2020, a study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases from Jaafar et al. had asserted, based on patient labs and clinical data involving nearly 4,000 patients, that a Ct of 30 was appropriate for making public policy. An update to the CDC instructions for PCR testing from December 1, 2020, still uses a Ct of 40.

Shortly before the New York Times article was published, the CDC revised its COVID-19 test recommendations, saying that only syptomatic patients should be tested. The media went insane, and Dr. Fauci went all over television saying he was not part of the decision to change the testing standards:
β€œI am concerned about the interpretation of these recommendations and worried it will give people the incorrect assumption that asymptomatic spread is not of great concern. In fact it is.”
So, of course, the Mendacious Midgetβ„’ had spoken, and the guidelines went back to testing everyone, all the time, with an oversensitive test.


The idea that asymptomatic spread was a concern as of August was just one of many lies Dr. Fauci told.
At the beginning of the pandemic in late January, he said:

The one thing historically that people need to realize is that even if there is some asymptomatic transmission, in all the history of respiratory borne viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person. Even if there is a rare asymptomatic person that might transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers.
There is not a single study or meta-analysis that differs from Fauci’s original assessment.

Today, within an hour of Joe Biden being inaugurated and signing an executive order mandating masks on all federal property, the WHO sent out a notice to lab professionals using the PCR test. It said:

WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1).
The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load.
Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.
literally one hour after Biden takes the oath, the WHO admits that PCR testing at high amplification rates alters the predictive value of the tests and results in a huge number of false positives pic.twitter.com/iDtXmappRw
β€” Andy Swan (@AndySwan) January 20, 2021
This translates to β€œin the absence of symptoms, a high Ct value means you are highly unlikely to become ill or get anyone else sick in the absence of very recent exposure to an infected person.”

Dr. Fauci knew this in July when he said that tests with a Ct above 35 were likely picking up viral debris or dead virus.

Even at a Ct of 35, the incidence of virus samples that could replicate is very low, according to Jaafar et al.

The only state I know that requires reporting the Ct with every test is Florida, which started this policy in December.

The WHO went on, stating:

Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.
In short, a positive PCR test in the absence of symptoms means nothing at a Ct of higher than 30, according to the experts interviewed by the New York Times and according to Jaafar et al. Yet positive tests is the number CNN loves flashing on the screen.

If the percentage found by the Times in August holds, there have been approximately 2.43 million actual cases to date, not 24.3 million.

There is also no way to calculate the deaths from COVID-19 rather than deaths with some dead viral debris in the nostrils.

What I have referred to as the β€œcasedemic” since September will be magically solved just in time for Joe Biden to look like a hero. For doing absolutely nothing.

Do not tell me there is not a politicized deep state in our health agencies. Do not ever tell me I need to listen to Dr. Anthony Fauci again. And every business owner who has been ruined because of lockdowns due to a high number of β€œcases” should be livid. Any parent whose child has lost a year of school should be furious.

None of this was for your health. It was to get rid of Orange Man Bad.

now they will drop the cycle rates and you can watch the curve go negative... like magic... because the new magic man isn't the bad man and the masks he ordered worked!!!!!
β€” Andy Swan (@AndySwan) January 20, 2021
As an aside, this also clearly explains the disappearance of the "flu" during this season as the plethora of high Ct PCR Tests supposedly pointing to a surge in COVID are nothing of the sort.



As Stephen Lendman noted previously, claiming β€œlockdowns stopped flu in its tracks, (outbreaks) plummet(ting) by 98% in the United States” ignored that what’s called COVID is merely seasonal influenza combined with false positives (extremely high Ct) from PCR-Tests.

And for that reason, the great 2020 disappearing flu passes largely under the mass media’s radar. Media proliferated mass deception and the power of repetition get most people to believe and having successfully "killed the flu", they will now do the same with COVID... and, if allowed by our betters, we will all return to the new normal they desire.
 
Last edited:

DaveA

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
If a large percentage of reported Covid cases were false positives, that's bad news for two reasons: (1) a smaller denominator increases the morbidity and mortality rates and (2) lots of people think they're now immune but aren't.
 

Walter

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½
@DaveA, What morbidity?

The deathcount over all literally has not increased at all, neither in the US or in Germany!

US

Nothing here that we didn't already know, and some of this info was already reported by the CDC itself here.

The report was published in a student publication from Johns Hopkins, so unless Johns Hopkins stopped admitted qualified students, it's gen-u-ine I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE.



Completely unsurprisingly, the original link to this story was almost immediately taken down. But it lives on at archive.is !!


Sometime later, the link was restored, with all content removed, except for panicky disavowals. I guess the fact that the author cited CDC data means nothing to them?

Editor’s Note: After The News-Letter published this article on Nov. 22, it was brought to our attention that our coverage of Genevieve Briand’s presentation β€œCOVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data” has been used to support dangerous inaccuracies that minimize the impact of the pandemic.
We decided on Nov. 26 to retract this article to stop the spread of misinformation, as we noted on social media. However, it is our responsibility as journalists to provide a historical record. We have chosen to take down the article from our website, but it is available
here as a PDF.

In accordance with our standards for transparency, we are sharing with our readers how we came to this decision.
The News-Letter is an editorially and financially independent, student-run publication. Our articles and content are not endorsed by the University or the School of Medicine, and our decision to retract this article was made independently.

Briand’s study should not be used exclusively in understanding the impact of COVID-19, but should be taken in context with the countless other data published by Hopkins, the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
As assistant director for the Master’s in Applied Economics program at Hopkins, Briand is neither a medical professional nor a disease researcher. At her talk, she herself stated that more research and data are needed to understand the effects of COVID-19 in the U.S.
Briand was quoted in the article as saying, β€œAll of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers.” This claim is incorrect and does not take into account the spike in raw death count
from all causes compared to previous years. According to the CDC, there have been almost 300,000 excess deaths due to COVID-19. Additionally, Briand presented data of total U.S. deaths in comparison to COVID-19-related deaths as a proportion percentage, which trivializes the repercussions of the pandemic. This evidence does not disprove the severity of COVID-19; an increase in excess deaths is not represented in these proportionalities because they are offered as percentages, not raw numbers.

Briand also claimed in her analysis that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may be incorrectly categorized as COVID-19-related deaths. However, COVID-19
disproportionately affects those with preexisting conditions, so those with those underlying conditions are statistically more likely to be severely affected and die from the virus.

Because of these inaccuracies and our failure to provide additional information about the effects of COVID-19,
The News-Letter decided to retract this article. It is our duty as a publication to combat the spread of misinformation and to enhance our fact-checking process. We apologize to our readers.
Zerohedge reported analysis on the original story here. It's nothing you don't already know, but here it is for completeness:

Germany
Finally I was able to find some numbers of deaths per year from Germany from the Federal Office for Statistics.

pp 65-67

2020: 874,340 without December

2019:
939,520

2018: 954,874

2017: 932,263

2016: 910,899

Because of the missing December data I formed the mean/average of the eleven months January through November (79,485.454) and added it as the hypothetical 12th month and thus formed my laymanΒ΄s prognosis for a complete year 2020.

2020: 953,825
Second highest number in our sample set of five years, lower than 2018, or in other words absolutely nothing out of the ordinary!
 

ItsAlwaysSomething

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
If a large percentage of reported Covid cases were false positives, that's bad news for two reasons: (1) a smaller denominator increases the morbidity and mortality rates and (2) lots of people think they're now immune but aren't.
It equally means that the people who "died" from it croaked due to something else, which is something the FDA admitted months ago.

Testing is the lens through which all COVID-19 studies have taken place. One of the earliest pieces of evidence that this was a hoax came out of Stanford, which tested around 4000 Santa Clara county residents for a study. The study concluded that the virus was 50-80 times more prevalent than indicated from the amount of reported cases. Their conclusion perfectly explains just why Americans died at roughly the same clip in 2020 as they did in 2019.

They still don't have an isolated sample of the so called virus, either. The inventor of the PCR test was a noted Fauci critic in the time between AIDS and now. He curiously turned up dead just a few short months before mainstream media began talking about the super scary "China virus." He said that the test is basically useless in how it is utilized. RT reported that sewage from March 2019 in Spain yielded a positive for COVID-19. Two academics traced an outbreak of so called COVID-19 among Chinese miners in 2012. A University of Pittsburgh medical researcher was on the cusp of curing coronavirus before getting killed in a dispute over a "romantic partner." The men in this incident were Asian, which is not exactly a group known for having nigga moments.

Connect the dots and you'll see what a joke it all is.
 
Last edited:

DaveA

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
In the USA at least 15% more people died in 2020 than 2019, 400,000 more deaths than expected. That's a hard statistic to fake because you're counting all dead bodies regardless of the alleged cause. Some of that increase came from suicides and drug overdoses, because most people need to socialize to maintain good mental health.

Whereas a widely-used PCR test that flags common-cold viruses as Covid could easily quadruple the total case count.
 

Iconoclast

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
The tweet is gone. In the future we should always post an archived link or a screenshot of anything that we link to on twitter, because they are shutting everything down.
Yes, always post a screenshot. I've been saying this repeatedly.
 

ItsAlwaysSomething

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
The tweet is gone. In the future we should always post an archived link or a screenshot of anything that we link to on twitter, because they are shutting everything down.
Yes, always post a screenshot. I've been saying this repeatedly.
It's the top story on ZH right now. I'll just replace the OP with that article.
 

marbleking

black magic ice honkey
Cave Beast
β°β˜•
In the USA at least 15% more people died in 2020 than 2019, 400,000 more deaths than expected. That's a hard statistic to fake because you're counting all dead bodies regardless of the alleged cause. Some of that increase came from suicides and drug overdoses, because most people need to socialize to maintain good mental health.

Whereas a widely-used PCR test that flags common-cold viruses as Covid could easily quadruple the total case count.
How many die of the flu in an awful flu season?

I hate to call names, but you're either a lying cuck faggot or the kind of dipshit that thinks CNN tells you the truth.
 

DaveA

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
How many die of the flu in an awful flu season?
Covid looks to me about as bad as the 1957 Asian flu, though that one killed people of all ages. Hard to say because it's far from over.

And now there's said to be a new strain in Manaus, Brazil that's killing a lot of young people. Diseases evolve, and in slum conditions like the trenches of WWI and third-world favelas, they evolve toward greater lethality.

Just because the Dems took advantage of a pandemic to oust Trump and seize absolute power doesn't mean the pandemic is fake.
 

Arminius

On top of the mountain, but only halfway up
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
In the USA at least 15% more people died in 2020 than 2019, 400,000 more deaths than expected. [...] Some of that increase came from suicides and drug overdoses, because most people need to socialize to maintain good mental health.
Covid looks to me about as bad as the 1957 Asian flu, though that one killed people of all ages. Hard to say because it's far from over.
>There are more deaths
>People die because of the lockdown

>COVID IS REALLY BAD


(It would also be weird to attribute the supposed higher death toll in the USA to Covid, as such a higher death toll can't be observed in other countries like, for example, Germany. The only real way to know what the fatality rate of this coronavirus is, is by performing autopsies on people that have tested positive for the virus, and then died, to find the real number of deaths caused by the virus and by also performing large-scale anti-body tests on the population. Doing this will give you a fatality rate that is about the same as that of any other flu (this was done in Moskow, the fatality rate was 0.13%). Whatever the case may be, nothing could justify the "response to" this flu virus.)
 
Last edited:

Arminius

On top of the mountain, but only halfway up
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
Covid looks to me about as bad as the 1957 Asian flu, though that one killed people of all ages.
Small addition: You should not believe falsehoods promoted by the mainstream media and the corrupt, evil establishment in order to enrich themselves and take freedoms away from the population, just because they can emotionally manipulate you into worrying about your parents and gay brother because of this flu virus.
I'm not saying that this is why you believe what you wrote, you may also just believe this narrative by the mainstream media for no reason at all, but it should be noted.
 

Mistaf

ℑ𝔫𝔱𝔒𝔯𝔒𝔰𝔱𝔦𝔫𝔀 𝔗𝔦π”ͺ𝔒𝔰 π”—π”―π”žπ”³π”’π”©π”’π”―
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
Covid looks to me about as bad as the 1957 Asian flu, though that one killed people of all ages. Hard to say because it's far from over.
You are right about the severity, that's a medium flu, but of course it was already over. We're in the next flu season now, obviously.

And now there's said to be a new strain in Manaus, Brazil that's killing a lot of young people. Diseases evolve, and in slum conditions like the trenches of WWI and third-world favelas, they evolve toward greater lethality.
As a DS reader you really should know better than to jump on every sensationalist tidbit the MSM provides you with, shouldn't you?

Just because the Dems took advantage of a pandemic to oust Trump and seize absolute power doesn't mean the pandemic is fake.
No, but for starters, getting rid of the most important metric to define a pandemic, the number of deaths, means that the pandemic is fake. Having no extra mortality means that the pandemic is fake.
Sure, there are countries that did have more deaths then usually, but since others had not it might be good to look at other factors that could've caused this. Also, the European countries that were hit hardest already had a tendency towards more deaths in flu season so, again, you would have to look for other contributing factors.

The pandemic narrative remains a load of horse droppings.

charts-z-scores-by-country.png

 
Last edited:

Harbingrr

All Hail Ashli Babbitt
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
Covid looks to me about as bad as the 1957 Asian flu, though that one killed people of all ages. Hard to say because it's far from over.

And now there's said to be a new strain in Manaus, Brazil that's killing a lot of young people. Diseases evolve, and in slum conditions like the trenches of WWI and third-world favelas, they evolve toward greater lethality.

Just because the Dems took advantage of a pandemic to oust Trump and seize absolute power doesn't mean the pandemic is fake.
I'm not sure you are Stormer material tbh
 

Aquafina

Internet Fun Police
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ–
Covid looks to me about as bad as the 1957 Asian flu, though that one killed people of all ages. Hard to say because it's far from over.

And now there's said to be a new strain in Manaus, Brazil that's killing a lot of young people. Diseases evolve, and in slum conditions like the trenches of WWI and third-world favelas, they evolve toward greater lethality.

Just because the Dems took advantage of a pandemic to oust Trump and seize absolute power doesn't mean the pandemic is fake.
All the word pandemic means is that 'it gets around', the flu is a yearly pandemic. A trick by shitlibs is to claim that anti-lockdown protestors believe the virus is not real... that is not so. They believe that the reaction to it is insane and far worse than the flu virus itself
 

anti-barabas-ite

Work stuff through in your brain...
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺ️
Escaped True Master
You are right about the severity, that's a medium flu, but of course it was already over. We're in the next flu season now, obviously.


As a DS reader you really should know better than to jump on every sensationalist tidbit the MSM provides you with, shouldn't you?


No, but for starters, getting rid of the most important metric to define a pandemic, the number of deaths, means that the pandemic is fake. Having no extra mortality means that the pandemic is fake.
Sure, there are countries that did have more deaths then usually, but since others had not it might be good to look at other factors that could've caused this. Also, the European countries that were hit hardest already had a tendency towards more deaths in flu season so, again, you would have to look for other contributing factors.

The pandemic narrative remains a load of horse droppings.

View attachment 41534

Ivor cummings has done some nice work deciphering the plandemic on his jewtube channel

I believe he is equating higher flu mortality in some eu countries to the amount of previous flu mortality...if they had weak numbers to last flu it might equate to higher numbers in next round... how high a population of old sick ppl etc how packed into dying emporiums they are etc.

 

DaveA

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
They believe that the reaction to it is insane and far worse than the flu virus itself
The country is deeply divided on this issue, but it's not so much a left-vs-right split as a young-and-healthy-vs-old-and-sick split. I'm 50, male, blood type A, which puts me roughly in the middle. I met a 49-year-old white female nurse, also type A, who got very sick with Covid and still had tightness in her chest months later.
 

Bernamej

French Builder of Time Machine to Save Baby Hitler
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
Escaped True Master
All the word pandemic means is that 'it gets around', the flu is a yearly pandemic. A trick by shitlibs is to claim that anti-lockdown protestors believe the virus is not real... that is not so. They believe that the reaction to it is insane and far worse than the flu virus itself
Well I’m one of those who say it’s not real. Because there’s no reason to believe there is some virus killing more than the ordinary. Going beyond that requires us to engage with rabbis about Talmudic bullshit.
There’s no reason to talk about any virus if there’s no new danger.
If there’s no new danger, and if the media lies, and if you’re not an epidemiologist with some microscope, then you have no reason to believe it’s real.
Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Top