What's the basis for alt-right's Christianity?

Cathy

Fiddle with it to realize
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
'm going to stay neutral
But I will point out that the Hyksos were jews
Bwahaha face palm. This is not neutral
facepalm.jpg
What part of symbolic fiction do you not understand about "jewish" identity???
The_great_jewish_masque.jpg

Archaeology theorizes that this is the beginning of the 'Exodus' story.
I'm going to stay neutral in that regard.
You are a fucking liar bro or you don't get it. Here is the fallacy I will point out:

The Shabbos Principal:
The very second anyone criticizes the origins of Christianity, the shabbos will identify himself by: identifying the European characteristics of Christianity that were incorporated into its tradition with a foreign Abrahamic text.

jews is that they have traditions and an entire self identity based on a book written in the bronze age
You almost got it. So close. Now consider that this book is symbolic fiction

Swinging chickens, seeing the 'other' as rightful slaves or cattle.
lol. yeah that is the problem with the Abrahamic temple tradition. It requires truth through enlightenment be impossible or less possible or only possible if you are "chosen". It is totally and entirely irreconcilable with almost all European temple traditions
 
Last edited:

Kalli

ᛇ α›ˆ ᛉ α›‹ ᛏ α›’ α›—
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“
lol. yeah that is the problem with the Abrahamic temple tradition. It requires truth through enlightenment be impossible or less possible or only possible if you are "chosen". It is totally and entirely irreconcilable with almost all European temple traditions
I'm not disagreeing with you tbh, because I'm not fully christian. But there is no need to attack the beliefs of others. And yes, my comment was neutral. If I wanted to go 'claws out brutal' I have the education to do so and could likely eviscerate most anyone from any faith in religious debate. There is just no benefit and I am not here to evangelize.
I care first and foremost about white interests, and the survival of white peoples. It doesn't matter what flavor of bronze age boor one behaves as, they are still behaving as a bronze age boor.

But which god a person prays to or believes in should be strictly between that individual and his god. It is none of our business.
 
Last edited:

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
Do you know anyone else IRL such as family or friends that share your beliefs?
plenty. I will like to remind you however that ideas expressed through institutions are organized in such a manner to allow for the division of labor in a society as a whole. Somewhere in a boring room with uncomfortable chairs is a small group of mathematicians that no other people in the world can understand, but the problems that they solve will have societal implications that everyone will recognize without understanding their proofs. Their language is symbolic and its fiction is true to the extent the solutions were propagated by the outcomes reciprocated
 

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
But there is no need to attack the beliefs of others.
I do not consent to my intentions being characterized in this manner. How do you "attack" an idea? "oh gwod don't attack my idea". I can do the hug box thing too but I also want to accomplish things
C09ED031-739A-4022-A1AB-6828A927CDEE.jpeg.53b48c731a26aeeb4c59bef38ff403ab.jpg

I care first and foremost about white interests
my comment was neutral
I demonstrated clear proof of multiple contradictions

There is just no benefit
metaphysics precedes politics
metaphysics precedes politics
metaphysics precedes politics

I have the education to do so and could likely eviscerate most anyone
knowthyself.jpg

An awful lot of fence strattleing to defend something that has nothing to do with "White" or "European" and also just so happen to correlate directly with the people it is claimed that "White" and "European" to oppose the most which cannot, by the way, has no actual existence outside a symbolic fiction asserted positively by force (literally millions of European deaths). None of it makes any sense. it is all so tiresome.
so_tiresome.png
 

Cathy

Fiddle with it to realize
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“
plenty. I will like to remind you however that ideas expressed through institutions are organized in such a manner to allow for the division of labor in a society as a whole. Somewhere in a boring room with uncomfortable chairs is a small group of mathematicians that no other people in the world can understand, but the problems that they solve will have societal implications that everyone will recognize without understanding their proofs. Their language is symbolic and its fiction is true to the extent the solutions were propagated by the outcomes reciprocated
So you know plenty of dudes that share your beliefs and so you can discuss and support each other, correct?
Yet, here you are, on a forum in which no one shares your beliefs, but you insist on imposing yours?
What chutzpah, dude.
 

Kalli

ᛇ α›ˆ ᛉ α›‹ ᛏ α›’ α›—
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“
I do not consent to my intentions being characterized in this manner. How do you "attack" an idea?
At this point I am pretty sure that you have full blown autism, consent or not, and you are approaching the whole matter in bad faith. So i will waste no more time replying.
 

Cathy

Fiddle with it to realize
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“
Your participation was voluntary of which I enjoy, am delighted to be in the presence of, and would not have it any other way
View attachment 1278
Your refusal to acknowledge different views and beliefs without imposing your own says a lot about you. And it's not good.

Perhaps your alter ego, @Harkon Ripsplitter can set you straight.πŸ˜€
 
Last edited:

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
Your refusal to acknowledge different views and beliefs
lol. wtf? What is the purpose of stating a belief if it is self evident. You could be watching netflix n' sheeit. I appreciate everything you have acknowledged, however you do recognize there are political issues that must be navigated. Therefore the existence of it being an issue must imply that our beliefs have not reach the consensus of applicable solutions which result in successful outcomes. We will only achieve it together
 

Auslander-Raus!

A John Wick behind every blade of grass.
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
Yet, here you are, on a forum in which no one shares your beliefs, but you insist on imposing yours?
Yes, looks to me like some attention whore who is so infatuated with his tiny sliver of knowledge he has lost control of any social graces that may have existed prior to this 'mental revolution of self actuated brilliance'.

Never expect a straight answer from one of them. They don't have one.

 

Cathy

Fiddle with it to realize
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“
Yes, looks to me like some attention whore who is so infatuated with his tiny sliver of knowledge he has lost control of any social graces that may have existed prior to this 'mental revolution of self actuated brilliance'.

Never expect a straight answer from one of them. They don't have one.

LollπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚
 

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
Yes, looks to me like some attention whore who is so infatuated with his tiny sliver of knowledge he has lost control of any social graces that may have existed prior to this 'mental revolution of self actuated brilliance'.

Never expect a straight answer from one of them. They don't have one.

Wait a second. Are you implying me to be atheistic? So... religion can only ever be some evil Schlomo in the sky. Surely there was religion before this text was written. Also surely there were people, but somehow by magic it must not be questioned, a select group that does not correlate with nature, became CHOSEN.

We are the Chosen I assure you. It will work i promise. See I can prove it:
How_Did_You_Do_That.jpg
See I told you so. BTFO atheists!
 

Kazeck

If it's All White it's All Right.
Old World Underground
β°β˜•
Metaphysics precedes politics. If you do not find value in these discussions it was never your intention to accomplish anything. Therefore you might as well not do anything. So then what are you doing?


This mash of illiteracy illustrates perfectly that you have nothing yet unique to offer. You have given up, or did you ever even try? You have no control over who controls you with no desire to control anything yourself. You conflate four things together that only in your post hoc imagination of success was something you determined.

This concern trolling is epic brah. Its great but this implies what you are doing itself has no harmful effect. This is all the same rhetorical argumentation I had to encounter with the wignats. "You're punching right", "Your dividing the moobment", "Just let me do my own thing". The only thing that defines what you are doing is a lack of ability to accomplish anything political, that is, where politics requires the unity of people around a common purpose beneficial existing in the future. What you are doing is taking the shameful existence given to you and rationalizing it as the common purpose you desire so you do not have to express political unity. I believe this is called Slave Morality or something like it. Why not just go back to the Hitler fantasies. At last that was fun.
>The Virgin Partitioner
>More libertarian than a libertarian but swears he disagrees and does it alot. Just wants you to know
View attachment 1245



There is a way in which these two contradict eachother that people are afraid to recognize. It must be recognized. If what you are saying is "I get it but we have to work inside the boundaries being imposed upon us now", I would say that was my intention from the beginning. However this is heresy may I remind you, because the moment you recognize believing in "the word of (((god)))" is a choice, that it may or may not be true, you have refused consent to the submission of its subjugation. This is the problem. Can you go to a White Privilege seminar and say, "This may or may not be true"? HAHA NO! Is there perhaps a (((coincidence))) coinciding with this?


This is the conflict against European people. It cant not be. I did not say it is "Christianity" itself whatever that may be in the minds of people, but the foreign nature of its origins. There is room here to breath here a little.
Illiteracy? commas can be used to make secondary or otherwise less important parts of sentence separate yet still there, it's like saying 'as an aside'.

It's not concern trolling, it's a genuine belief that we have to try to get along, something you're obviously not mature enough to do. If we can't have a broad-base coalition for White Rights and White Sovereignty then we can't win in this era end of story.

This quote from you is very important though.
'How is that working out for you? If you flee whenever asked to define white, how can anyone take you serious if the theme central to your effort itself is abandoned. What are you even doing then? Where then did you even get this idea of "White" if you cannot define it? You did not come up with it is all we know for sure.'

That said, 'define white' Nigger what the fuck did you just say? I define whiteness as being Genetically White, having some god damned pride, and drawing on our BLOOD not our 'faith' not our 'spiritual roots' that vary from one region to another, no, our Blood. We share the same phenotype, the same genetics, same genetic inclinations, we are One People. Europa has it's differences, but put Any White next to a Nigger, a Spic, a Chink, any of them, and you can tell Immediately who is White. Acting like we need some 'spiritual identity' to define being White is an actual troll.

By the way, I have a history of not insulting people, not being rude, of trying to be constructive, but your attitude with me here? This is why people hate so many of the Christians around here, you're divisive, arrogant, act like Boomers when it comes to anything spiritual. Go on and tell everyone about Jesus and how we should live, tell everyone about your specific unique theory of how Christianity supports White people, I'd rather focus on Immigration, Economics, Philosophy.

It's only in yielding to pragmatism that I reach across to people like you and try to be respectful, but a significant portion of your type can't show any respect in return. I don't show a need for control in my posts because I respect everyone here as individuals with the ability to make their own determinations, I respect my brethren as being of equivocal or even greater intelligence than myself, because when you set out in a discussion with the assumption that your peers are your inferiors or somehow unable to make their own decisions then you've set out to Teach, to Instruct, to Browbeat.

Your approach? It's fine with normies, but here? We're redpilled people here, everyone here understands the nature of the world far more than the vast majority outside this forum, so why talk down to people? Because you start the discussion with the assumption of your own superiority?

Edit: By the way you offer nothing 'unique' either, I can get a snide talking down to from tons of people, I was being concise in my explanations because I wanted to avoid conflict. Why did I want to avoid conflict? I'm not a pussy, I don't avoid it out of some fear of retribution, even if I was fucking banned for stirring some shit up I would take that, no it's because I didn't want conflict in a place where we are supposed to be cooperating, working together, towards the same goals. I could type a fucking novella about my philosophy but what good would it do? People believe what they believe, if someone was deeply curious I'd have been fine responding, or opening another thread to explain it, but starting a fight here is counter-productive. So why did I reply like this to you? I am a man, I have my pride, and fuck you for talking down to me.
 
Last edited:

Kazeck

If it's All White it's All Right.
Old World Underground
β°β˜•
I'm not disagreeing with you tbh, because I'm not fully christian. But there is no need to attack the beliefs of others. And yes, my comment was neutral. If I wanted to go 'claws out brutal' I have the education to do so and could likely eviscerate most anyone from any faith in religious debate. There is just no benefit and I am not here to evangelize.
I care first and foremost about white interests, and the survival of white peoples. It doesn't matter what flavor of bronze age boor one behaves as, they are still behaving as a bronze age boor.

But which god a person prays to or believes in should be strictly between that individual and his god. It is none of our business.
Agreed, I wish some of the people here could understand that, it does us little good to in-fight.
 

PureDureSure

Bottom Text
Old World Underground
β°β˜•
The people living in the M.E. today are not the same people that lived there in the past. You're being intentionally obtuse because that's your only strength.
I don’t think anyone’s arguing that. Even the guy spamming weird memes.

But it’s equally false to pretend that the people living in the Middle East two to ten thousand years ago were genetically Northern European.
 

Astral-Pepe

Behind Enemy Lines
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“
But it’s equally false to pretend that the people living in the Middle East two to ten thousand years ago were genetically Northern European.
I'm not pretending anything, I'm only interested in proof. My point was that you can't determine who lived in an area in the ancient past based on who lives there today. I'll stick by that because it is self-evidently true.

I'm also unsure what you mean by "genetically Northern European" but the Indo-Aryan or Indo-European peoples migrated as far East as China and as far South as India. We can look at their physical remains in the form of mummies or we can prove this linguistically and by the technologies they brought with them. Scroll back up and look at that Tocharian mummy and tell me that isn't a White man. There are hundreds of mummies like that throughout Mongolia, China and all along the areas that made up the precursor to the Silk Road.

We've had a veil of lies pulled over our eyes by mainstream historians and archaeologists. They have been intentionally wrong about so many things. They will even tell you why its best for us all to believe the story they're selling:


You know about Γ–tzi? He's that 5,700 year old mummy found in the alps. He had acupuncture tattoos more than 2000 years before acupuncture was practiced in China.

VTPVJ5HYc9P5MxX3LoRRLV-1200-80.jpg

He also had a bronze axe, again this mummy is from what used to be called the stone age and he has a piece of technology that's out of place by at least 2000 years.

serveimageWTZQVS23.jpg

Many supposedly established facts need to be questioned.

Anyway brother its Easter and I don't want to argue today.
 

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
Go on and tell everyone about Jesus and how we should live, tell everyone about your specific unique theory of how Christianity supports White people, I'd rather focus on Immigration, Economics, Philosophy.
Check my activity. Do you know who you are interacting with? Wew this has to be trolling me. My message is simple: Criticism of the Abrahamic temple tradition. I try not to criticize Christianity specifically because there are complex differences.

Acting like we need some 'spiritual identity' to define being White is an actual troll.
I am saying "White" has very little value to signify claim as identity. It is not therefore valid to question your claim? Immediately I know you are American like myself because this idea of the color "white" as people is confusing and rejected by mostly every other person you attach that identity to outside America. I am here to tell you that you have a problem much greater than you realize. There are still many of these color "white" people with living memory of how our color "white" people killed millions of their color "white" people for less reason than was necessary. None of your heartfelt emotions suggest that it would not happen again if a jew starts crying on CNN. We can change this. We will only achieve it together.
we are One People.
This is a spiritual claim. It contradicts the previous quoted statement. This is most important. That the idea of a people that people have about themselves really actually is actually spiritual. It is expressed through language. It is no coincidence Aryan/Indo-European is a language group is an identity. Race is also a spiritual concept (see next quote). This trend of identity and language is very very common. I define how this works in pic below 2nd paragraph from the bottom where it starts with "Nurture is nature"
Schedule_of_Scuccess.png


[...]the same genetics, [...]We share the same phenotype, [...]I define whiteness as being Genetically White
It just so happens genetics is not the ultimate determinate means of identifying people for political means. The observation must still be made, where you draw an imaginary circle around people who may not know they have been circled, or may not consent to being circled. It is highlighted in bold because it just so happens to be the greatest most significant obstacle we have. The world will not just magically love you for being color white if you wait long enough for our problems to get worse. The opposite is more likely.


our approach? It's fine with normies, but here? We're redpilled people here
If this is a troll you got me. lol. Who is this?

You see the heat I get on this forum. you were not exactly inviting angels
 

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
I'm not pretending anything, I'm only interested in proof. My point was that you can't determine who lived in an area in the ancient past based on who lives there today.
Your post is true but c'mon. I know if I go back I will find you making the Abraham is color white argument.
 

Auslander-Raus!

A John Wick behind every blade of grass.
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
it’s equally false to pretend that the people living in the Middle East two to ten thousand years ago were genetically Northern European.
You really need to study more instead of posting ridiculous statements like this.
Ancient Greeks generally regarded as white lived in Egypt, this is long known. Jesus spoke Greek. Did those Greeks take a plane and land at Cairo airport?
King Tut belonged to a genetic profile group, known as haplogroup R1b1a2, to which more than 50 percent of all men in Western Europe belong, indicating that they share a common ancestor.

Among modern-day Egyptians this haplogroup contingent is below 1 percent, according to iGENEA.

Sure looks like Abraham came from Aryan India.
Have fun with this.
http://www.viewzone.com/abraham2.html
 

Highlander

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺ️
The original Israelis may have been White, but in the end, they were betrayed by the Jewish (Canaanite) god Jehovah because they were tricked into believing he was good by those very same devil worshipers.

There can only be one Good God.

Jesus of Galilee.

 
Top