What in hell IS covid 911 July 2021 edition

anti-barabas-ite

Work stuff through in your brain...UNVAXXED
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
Escaped True Master
since mercola is deleting his stuff afterv 48 hours...

there are always a few good tidbits to extract from the likes of mercola, adams et al...


is david martin a masonic operative working to kill you in your beds? is EM Jones a russian opperative corraling catholics into a staughter pen for the bolsheviks and bn'brith?

are all the oppositional forces "feds" and distraction agents? is there any online resistance, or is everyone being corralled one way or another into traps set up by the globohomoschlomo elites?

part of the plan is to create massive confusion, chaos and distrust in all things known and unknown.

its working.

mRNA Expert Speaks Out on the COVID Crisis
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
  • Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA and DNA vaccine core platform technology, expressed his concerns about the spike protein used in COVID-19 vaccines to the FDA last fall, but was dismissed
  • In its native form in SARS-CoV-2, the spike protein is responsible for the pathologies of the viral infection, and in its wild form it’s known to open the blood-brain barrier, cause cell damage (cytotoxicity) and other problems
  • Malone speaks about the bioethics of the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) granted to COVID-19 vaccines; experimentation without proper informed consent violates the Nuremberg Code
  • The concept of the noble lie was first described by Plato; it refers to the notion that, in the case of high-status individuals or designated public leaders, it’s acceptable to lie if the lie is made in the interest of the common good
  • Three lies are being circulated about COVID-19, including the need for herd immunity, the notion that herd immunity can only be achieved by universal vaccination and that the vaccines are completely safe; any discussion that challenges or goes against these three elements is censored
  • Malone believes that children and young adults up to age 30 or 35 should not be vaccinated because the risks outweigh the benefits in this population
When Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA and DNA vaccine core platform technology,1 spoke out about the risks of COVID-19 gene therapy vaccines in June 2021, he was surprised that the three-hour interview went viral. “It showed there was a huge thirst for information from people all over the world,” he said, speaking with Aga Wilson with Newsvoice.2
The podcast was erased from YouTube, and Malone quickly realized that his message, which he felt morally obliged to share, would not be heard via mainstream media.
“When it became clear to me that I would not be able to speak through mainstream media, I, together with my wife … made a conscious decision to reach out through alternative media and new media, and I’ve learned, from many, many podcasts and podcasters like yourself about the value of this new medium of podcasting,” he told Wilson.3
Experimental Vaccine Violates Bioethics Laws
With Malone’s impressive credentials, his grave concerns about COVID-19 vaccines have made many stop and listen, and people started writing to him about their own problems with censorship and the spectrum of adverse events with the vaccine. It all started, Malone said, with a long conversation with a physician in Canada, who poured his heart out about what he was experiencing in Canada treating patients with COVID-19 and adverse events after vaccination.
He reported them to authorities but was dismissed and told they weren’t related to the injection even though, in his clinical opinion, they were. With the mass vaccination campaign in full effect, Malone was also disturbed that it is considered OK by the government to entice children to get vaccinated by offering them free ice cream or doughnuts, and even allowing children to get vaccinated without their parents’ consent.

He soon ventured into the bioethics of the emergency use authorization (EUA) granted to COVID-19 vaccines. Experimentation without proper informed consent violates the Nuremberg Code,4 which spells out a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation.
This set of principles was developed to ensure the medical horrors discovered during the Nuremberg trials at the end of World War II would never take place again, but in the current climate of extreme censorship, people are not being informed about the full risks of the vaccines — which are only beginning to be uncovered.
Further, due to the EUA, adults aren’t required to sign informed consent documents and, at the same time, aren’t being given a full disclosure of the risks that would normally be given during a clinical trial5 — and, at this point, anyone who receives the vaccine is participating as a research subject.
FDA Dismissed Malone’s Vaccine Warning
Through his professional career, Malone has worked closely with the U.S. government for many years. As such, he has kept an open dialogue with colleagues at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, with whom he discussed concerns about adverse events and the spike protein used in COVID-19 vaccines.
In its native form in SARS-CoV-2, the spike protein is responsible for the pathologies of the viral infection, and in its wild form it’s known to open the blood-brain barrier, cause cell damage (cytotoxicity) and, Malone said, “is active in manipulating the biology of the cells that coat the inside of your blood vessels — vascular endothelial cells, in part through its interaction with ACE2, which controls contraction in the blood vessels, blood pressure and other things.”6
Malone is well aware of the actions of spike protein, as he worked to identify an effective drug that worked by blocking the action of the COX-2 enzyme, which is a key inflammatory enzyme. In one of his papers, he laid out how the spike protein and another protein in the virus directly turn on COX-2 promoter in infected cells.
This awareness of the spike protein as a biologically active protein made him alert the FDA about the associated risks last fall. His FDA colleagues transferred his concerns to the FDA’s review branch, which dismissed his concerns, saying they did not believe the spike protein was biologically active and there wasn’t enough documentation otherwise. As history now reveals, they proceeded with the EUA.
It’s since been revealed that the spike protein on its own is enough to cause inflammation and damage to the vascular system, even independent of a virus.7

Plato’s Noble Lie: Three False ‘Truths’ Being Circulated
The concept of the noble lie was first described by Socrates and Plato.8 It refers to the notion that, in the case of high-status individuals or designated public leaders, it’s acceptable to lie if the lie is made in the interest of the common good.
But in the modern day, in the midst of an unprecedented global pandemic in which government, Big Pharma, media and Big Tech have become integrated, we’re now seeing the noble lie “play out in a way that Plato could never have imagined,” Malone said.
Take Dr. Anthony Fauci — whose expertise has been held as indisputable by mainstream media since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. He’s been caught lying to both the public and the U.S. Senate on a number of issues, but nothing has been done about it.
Malone outlined three main logic elements — each false — that are being propagated as part of the grander noble lie. Any discussion that challenges or goes against these three elements is censored:9
1.Mitigating death and disease from COVID requires herd immunity — This is not true, as it’s possible to reduce death and disease from COVID-19 using medications like ivermectin and many others, including anti-inflammatories.
2.The only way to reach herd immunity is through universal vaccination — This is another lie. As Malone says, “Herd immunity is most often reached through natural infection.” Further, there’s no solid data on whether COVID injections reduce transmissibility, which changes depending on the variant anyway. So the idea that we must reach a certain percentage of herd immunity in the population to end the pandemic “fails the logic test.”
Even the World Health Organization advises people who are vaccinated to continue wearing masks due to the delta variant because “vaccine alone won’t stop community transmission.”10 “Vaccines will not get us to herd immunity,” Malone said.11
3.The vaccines are completely safe — This is another lie, as it’s well known that the vaccines are not completely safe. Malone listed several adverse events that are already raising red flags. Another important point: Censorship prevents full comprehension of these risks.
CardiotoxicityCoagulation problems
Female reproductive health concernsMiscarriage in the first and second trimesters (this has not yet been confirmed), Thrombocytopenia (dropping blood platelets)
Brain and nervous system disordersGuillain-Barré syndrome (GBS)
Data Do Not Support Vaccination of Children
Malone believes that children and young adults up to age 30 or 35 should not be vaccinated, noting that the total number of COVID-19 deaths for birth- to 18-year-olds during the entire pandemic is 386.12 Children reap little benefit from this vaccine, not only because they’re at very low risk from COVID-19, but also because, according to Peter Doshi, Ph.D., a significant portion of U.S. children are already immune and aren’t at risk of infection to begin with.
Doshi cited Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data showing an estimated 23% of children under the age of 4 and 42% of those ages 5 through 17 have already had a SARS-CoV-2 infection and now have robust and long-lasting immunity.
The rationale has been that children should be vaccinated in order to protect the elderly, but this only has merit if the vaccine has no toxicity, which isn’t the case with COVID-19 injections, so the justification fails miserably. “We need to carefully think about who gets the benefit from vaccination, and focus vaccination on them,” Malone said.
For people who aren’t at high risk, it’s hard to justify exposing them to risk from a COVID-19 injection. Doshi similarly pointed out that the FDA has no basis on which to grant COVID-19 vaccines emergency use authorization for children in the first place, as COVID-19 is not an emergency in children. The threat this infection poses to children is negligible and no more serious than that of the common cold or flu.
The Power of Podcasts
Malone has been speaking out about the problems of censorship and the fact that physicians and scientists who raise concerns that go against the official narrative can be damaged professionally. He even heard an unsubstantiated report in Spain that a physician who advocates for alternative treatment strategies can be declared mentally incompetent and institutionalized.
“This is profoundly worrying,” he said, “but we’re seeing it all over the world … It’s extremely difficult to speak against this narrative.”13 Malone would know. Just five days after he publicly shared his concerns about the dangers of COVID-19 injections, his name and scientific credentials, including those relating to mRNA vaccines, were removed from Wikipedia.
Through his remaining contacts with the government, Malone is still trying to share this powerful insider information and data with those in positions of power who will listen. He comes from a place of caring and empathy and believes this, not fighting the opposition, is key.
He’s also speaking out via podcasts, which he believes are “extremely valuable” and “represent a threat to the narrative.” Instead of worrying about being deleted from social media or speaking to a reporter who may “cut and splice my words to fit some narrative that they want to impose … podcasts work. They get out to people.”
Malone is privy to the opposition he’s up against, but as a highly ethical physician committed to integrity — and preeminently qualified to speak on this topic — he feels it’s his duty to share the truth. It will take this and many others like him speaking out to counter the false narrative being forced upon us as the truth.
If we give up, we’ll continue down this rabbit hole in which misinformation becomes fact and believing it is the only choice to remain a part of society. This isn’t an option, which is why sharing data and information as Malone is doing is a heroic action that we can all take part in.


The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) recently posted more than 50 video presentations from the pay-for-view Fifth International Public Conference on Vaccination held online October 16 to 18, 2020, and made them available to everyone for free.

The conference's theme was "Protecting Health and Autonomy in the 21st Century" and it featured physicians, scientists and other health professionals, human rights activists, faith community leaders, constitutional and civil rights attorneys, authors and parents of vaccine injured children talking about vaccine science, policy, law and ethics and infectious diseases, including coronavirus and COVID-19 vaccines.

In December 2020, a U.K. company published false and misleading information about NVIC and its conference, which prompted NVIC to open up the whole conference for free viewing. The conference has everything you need to educate yourself and protect your personal freedoms and liberties with respect to your health.

Don’t miss out on this incredible opportunity. I was a speaker at this empowering conference and urge you to watch these video presentations before they’re censored and taken away by the technocratic elite.

Watch Now
 

anti-barabas-ite

Work stuff through in your brain...UNVAXXED
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
Escaped True Master
Germ theory has its own PR firm.

Ars Technica: Deep dive into stupid: Meet the growing group that rejects germ theory.

Listen up, sheeple: COVID-19 doesn't exist. Viruses don't cause disease, and they aren't contagious. Those doctors and health experts who say otherwise don't know what they're talking about; the real experts are on Facebook. And they're saying it loud and clear: The pandemic is caused by your own deplorable life choices, like eating meat or pasta. Any "COVID" symptoms you might experience are actually the result of toxic lifestyle exposures—and you have only yourself to blame.

As utterly idiotic and abhorrent as all of the above is, it's not an exaggeration of the messages being spread by a growing group of Darwin-award finalists on the Internet—that is, germ theory denialists. Yes, you read that correctly: Germ theory denialists—also known as people who don't believe that pathogenic viruses and bacteria can cause disease.

As an extension of their rejection of basic scientific and clinical data collected over centuries, they deny the existence of the devastating pandemic that has sickened upwards of 200 million people worldwide, killing more than 4 million.

Germ theory denialism isn't new. It can be traced back to the origin of germ theory itself, often to the contemporaries of Louis Pasteur named Claude Bernard and Antoine Béchamp. Both came up with opposing hypotheses to Pasteur's enduring germ theory. Bernard proposed the concept of milieu intérieur, which suggests that the body's internal environment—or terrain—maintains its equilibrium. The state of the terrain, rather than the presence of pathogens, ultimately dictates whether disease will develop (which is not an entirely crazy idea, given what we now know about the microbiome and the immunocompromised). Meanwhile, Béchamp—considered a bitter crank and rival of Pasteur—suggested that pathogenic bacteria are produced by human tissue as a response to a harmful change in the terrain. Thus, bacteria do not cause disease; they are merely a self-created symptom of it—which is clearly just incorrect.

The scientific and medical communities left these ideas behind in light of Pasteur's findings and, later, Robert Koch's foundational concepts for microbial pathogenesis, Koch's postulates. But it seems they have endured in a fringe community, with their interpretations and explanations shifting and morphing over time. And with the devastating global pandemic, the denialists seem to be having something of a renaissance.

A germ theory denialist emailed me and pointed to a Facebook group called "Terrain Model Refutes Germ Theory," where a particular strain of germ theory denialism is thriving. An administrator for the group noted in April that the group had reached 15,000 members, up from just 147 members in April of 2020. Now, just a few months later, the tally is up to 18,400.

Toxic ignorance
While the depths of human stupidity on display across the Internet rival that of the Marianas Trench, the audacious ignorance on display in this group is truly stunning. In the group's current take on germ theory denialism, bacteria are merely scavengers and are a symptom of disease. Viruses are considered cellular debris and cannot cause disease or transmit from one person to another.

According to the group members' delusions, there is only one disease in existence: toxemia. This disease is caused by toxic exposures that occur by leading a dirty, unnatural lifestyle, which causes damage to your terrain. All disease symptoms are merely a sign that your body is trying to "detox." If your body isn't able to detox, the disease will progress through seven levels, the last one being cancer. The type of symptom you're experiencing can help identify the kind of toxic exposure you've had. If you remove the toxic component of your diet or environment, you'll recover—though if you reach the seventh level, it can be hard to come back from.

More at link
 

anti-barabas-ite

Work stuff through in your brain...UNVAXXED
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
Escaped True Master
Here is another crackpot fed influencer thats spreading disinformation to make any resistor look foolish and ultimately change its mind and finally go along with the herd, the herd that alawys following science and jumping into bed with faggots!

Those most susceptible to dying from the COVID shots are those who are already coinfected with XMRV, HIV, Borrelia, Babesia and other pathogens commonly acquired from contaminated viral vaccines





STORY AT-A-GLANCE
  • The scientific discoveries made by Judy Mikovits and Frank Ruscetti showed the blood supply and vaccines have been tainted with disease-causing retroviruses for more than three decades, and the U.S. government has been hiding it the entire time
  • The leading cause of death among child-bearing women in the world is HIV/AIDS. Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), which primarily affects women, is basically AIDS without the HIV but with XMRVs and other co-infections like borrelia, babesia, mycoplasma and mold. It’s an acquired endocannabinoid immune dysfunction, and can be traced back to contaminated vaccines, biologicals and blood products that have been used for decades
  • According to Mikovits, SARS-CoV-2 is a cloned virus manufactured in a monkey cell line and it is therefore a monkey virus. It’s the result of a bat coronavirus being grown in a Vero monkey kidney cell line known to be contaminated with retroviruses including XMRVs
  • Mikovits believes “long-haul COVID” is the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein activating endogenous HERVW and recombining with XMRVs, — introduced via vaccinations. Similar recombination occurs with monkey SIVS in HIV-infected individuals
  • Those most susceptible to dying from the COVID shots are those who are already coinfected with XMRV, HIV, Borrelia, Babesia and other pathogens commonly acquired from contaminated viral vaccines
In this interview, Judy Mikovits, Ph.D., Frank Ruscetti, Ph.D., and Kent Heckenlively, a lawyer and science teacher, discuss “Ending Plague: A Scholar’s Obligation in an Age of Corruption,” which they co-wrote.
This is the third book in a trilogy that began with “Plague: One Scientist’s Intrepid Search for the Truth About Human Retroviruses and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), Autism, and Other Diseases” and “Plague of Corruption: Restoring Faith in the Promise of Science.”
The first two were co-written by Mikovits and Heckenlively. The inspiration for the third book came from Ruscetti, who has been Mikovits’ mentor and professional collaborator for 38 years. As indicated in the subtitle, we won’t be able to end these plagues of scientific and academic corruption unless or until scholars and scientists honor their professional obligations and responsibilities.
“That's the point of the book, and we wouldn't have this mess if people like Tony [Anthony] Fauci and Bob [Robert] Gallo didn't get away with this thin playbook for things like Ebola, Zika and the autism epidemic, all the way back to HIV/AIDS,” Mikovits says.
Selling Out Public Health for Profit
“Plague” and “Plague of Corruption” detail the scientific discoveries made by Mikovits and Ruscetti, which include the scandalous findings that the blood supply and vaccines are tainted with disease-causing retroviruses, and the U.S. government has been hiding it for decades. The books read like fast-paced thrillers and offer a view into the halls of scientific inquiry, to which few people ever are privy.
Book No. 3, “Ending Plague,” is primarily Ruscetti’s story. By 1983, when Ruscetti hired Mikovits as a lab tech at Fort Detrick, he’d recently discovered T cell growth factor, later renamed interleukin 2. He’d also discovered the first disease-causing human retrovirus, called human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV-11) or human T cell leukemia virus, back in 1980. The book starts with Ruscetti’s story and perspective.
“The motivation for writing the book is not something new,” Ruscetti says, “and unless we change the fortunes of every man, it's just going to get worse. [During] the AIDS epidemic, we were at an impasse. What most people don't realize is that it shouldn't have been at an impasse then, because if you look at the rest of the world, the No. 1 cause of death among women of child bearing age is HIV.2”
That’s a rather extraordinary statement. The leading cause of death among child-bearing women in the world is HIV/AIDS, but do you ever hear anything about that?3 If not, why do you think that is? In short, health agencies have done a terrible job over the last several decades, selling out public health for profit. As noted by Heckenlively:
“Public health has not been serving us well for the past 40 or 50 years. What I think is really extraordinary about Frank's story is he really details how science has gone wrong. We like to think of science as this democracy of experts: top people in their field discussing how the science should move forward. But public health is not like that.
Starting in the 1970s with Nixon's war on cancer, which accelerated under Reagan, these ‘czars’ of science were created. Tony Fauci is one of them. And then they demoted the other scientists to be like serfs. We don't really have that many ‘government scientists.’ We have a lot of scientists under contract with the federal government, and this has really set up a system where people like Tony Fauci essentially control public health.
I think if people understood that the system itself is set up so that relatively few people are in charge, then all of this makes more sense. So, when they talk about in the media ‘science is deciding this,’ ‘science is deciding that,’ it's really not.
It's just a relatively small handful of people, almost like a holy bureau of science, and that's what we're attacking. What we're trying to do is, we're trying to move science back to its original roots in which everybody who is qualified has a voice and can contribute to the discussion.”
Too Much Power in Too Few Hands
Fauci has been the head of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984. In the 37 years since, he’s been responsible for doling out research funding that amounts to nearly $1 trillion. Who has received those taxpayer dollars? Primarily those who are aligned with the drug industry. It’s become an incestuous relationship that revolves around the creation of profit, while the public receives virtually no benefit.
In fact, in many cases, public health has suffered tremendously, and people have no concept of what has happened, or how their ill health is the outgrowth of corrupted policies and conflicts of interest. Heckenlively says:
“The comparison I make is that Fauci has been head of National Institute for Allergy and infectious Diseases longer than J. Edgar Hoover was head of the FBI. [Editor’s note: Actually, Hoover was head of the FBI for 48 years, from 1924 to 19724] Whether you're right, left or middle, nobody believes that anybody should hold that kind of power for that long.
In fact, having that kind of power in and of itself is a really bad idea. I think [Fauci] really is a terrible person because not only has he been in charge of this system, he helped design this system. We need to get rid of Fauci and keep the next Fauci from taking power.”
Importantly, Fauci and Big Pharma not only control the funding of research, they also control what gets published and what’s buried. Fauci is the reason you’ve not heard about HIV/AIDS being a leading cause of death among women of childbearing age, worldwide. This statistic is censored, just like facts about COVID-19 treatment and COVID shots are censored.
As explained by Mikovits, chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), which primarily affects women, is basically AIDS without the HIV. It’s an immune dysfunction, and it can be traced back to contaminated vaccines, biologics and blood supply that have been used for decades.
As detailed in “Plague,” Fauci was a key figure in covering up the true cause of AIDS, which was incorrectly blamed on homosexuals and drug addicts. By fraudulently changing the definition of the disease and denying the presence of exogenous viruses, so-called xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related viruses or XMRVs, they prevented women from getting correct care. Mikovits explains:
“The definition was ‘Only HIV can cause AIDS,’ and we're looking at the same thing right now. There never was a SARS-CoV-2 monkey virus in hundreds of millions of people. They're being transmitted through the [COVID] vaccine, and through recombinants it can happen in only two weeks.”
SARS-CoV-2 Is a Cloned Monkey Virus
New York-based physician Dr. Andy Kaufman claims the SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been identified. According to Mikovits, he is dead-wrong. SARS-CoV-2 is a cloned monkey virus, manufactured in the Vero monkey kidney cell line and isolated only from that cell line, not from humans with COVID, she says.
The original bat coronavirus was grown in a Vero monkey kidney cell line known to be contaminated with retroviruses and coronaviruses that easily recombine every time the vaccines are manufactured in 100-liter productions.
Mikovits conducted experiments on bat tissue Ebola cultures in the same line of cells in the mid ‘90s, trying to understand how these viruses cause disease. What she discovered was that it’s not the infection that kills. It’s the inflammatory side effects and the dysregulation of the innate immune response that end up being lethal, and the virus causes this in part by shutting down the interferon pathways. Heckenlively explains:
“What Judy is saying is that when you mix these viruses in different cultures, you will get genetic sequences from the culture cells. The thing that our books really talk about is how dangerous this common practice is — taking, for example, a human virus that you isolate, and then grow it in animal cultures.
What a lot of people don't realize is that viruses are not like other living organisms. They're very promiscuous in their swapping of genetic codes. In April or May of 2020, [people said] ‘This bat virus seems to have some HIV spike proteins and sequence.’ How is it that you got monkey sequences in a bat virus?
Our contention is that this common practice of growing viruses in different animal cultures, including human cultures, is creating these Frankenstein viruses which will have genetic sequences from the mediums in which they're grown …
The belief in the ‘80s was that the HIV virus is hiding out in the T cells, which made absolutely no sense. It is true that as the disease progresses, the T cells would absolutely be taken out. That was an indicator of the infection, but what Judy and Frank were saying is that the HIV virus can't be hiding out in the T cells, especially because you got the development of AIDS dementia, and the T cells, are not [found] in the brain.
Judy's seminal work with Frank was finding the actual reservoir in which the HIV virus lived, which was the mono site macrophages. If I understand Andy Kaufman's claims, I think he's throwing out the baby with the bath water. Judy is showing how the virus cause damage and how the establishment is wrong, and how some of these alternative people are missing part of the argument as well.”
SARS-CoV-2 Was Spread by Injection
Mikovits makes a number of shocking assertions in this interview. Among them, that SARS-CoV-2 was spread through the regular use of vaccines that had been contaminated with the SARS-CoV-2 virus because of manufacturing practices.
The monkey kidney cell lines that were used to manufacture many vaccines were contaminated with bat coronavirus and shipped around the world. Those vaccines were then injected into humans, called transfection. Their cells then began replicating what we now understand as the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
“They absolutely isolated a SARS-CoV-2 virus,” Mikovits says. “But there is not definitive-anything showing [that it] satisfies either Koch’s postulates or Hill criteria, which we did with the XMRVs, meaning the virus, in my opinion, is still a monkey virus that was spread via injection.”
In other words, while there is a virus named SARS-CoV-2, no one has proven that this viral isolate actually ever transmitted between humans or causes COVID-19. Her assertion is that SARS-CoV-2 is a monkey virus that is an artifact of culturing a bat coronavirus in Vero monkey kidney cell cultures that, for years, have been contaminated with XMRVs.
To prove SARS-CoV-2 causes COVID-19, you have to extract the virus from a person who has COVID-19, and infect another person with that virus. If the exposed individual gets COVID-19, then the virus would be the causative factor.
We know most individuals have been exposed to people with COVID-19, yet they do not develop COVID-19. This suggests that SARS-Co-V-2 is not the sole causative factor.
How the COVID Shots Produce Variants
Mikovits also believes the COVID jabs add to the pandemic by producing variants through a process called transfection. When a clone of an infectious viral sequence is injected in a synthetic viral particle called a lipid nanoparticle, it is not an infectious transmissible virus particle. Instead, the host cells’ machinery starts replicating the inoculated sequences or expressing the spike proteins.
In the case of the COVID jabs, your cells are producing the spike protein of the virus only, which is actually the pathogenic part of the virus. The spike protein is what’s causing the disease. Put another way, COVID-19 is not a viral infection. It’s caused by a metabolic toxin, namely the spike protein. This viral particle, in and of itself, functions like a synthetic virus.
The spike protein is synthetic because the mRNA injected has been genetically modified. The mRNA is not infectious or transmissible, but when injected, your body starts to make this synthetic spike protein that operates like a virus, and can be transmitted to other people. Heckenlively explains:
“Virologists say you need a complete virus to do harm. What Judy has [found] is that defective viruses can cause harm as well. If you think of a virus as a code, like a computer program, if you have a couple bad lines of code, that can still cause problems in your computer as well.
What Judy is saying is that viruses are dangerous in ways that are not fully appreciated by science. You don't have to have a complete virus in order to do harm. You can do sequences of the virus that they would call defective or garbage pieces, and it can still cause enormous harm, because those parts of the virus, such as the envelope, are affecting the function of your immune system.”
According to Mikovits, 8% of the human genome consists of endogenous viruses that include retroviral envelopes that are critical to the regulation of our innate immune responses, our critical type 1 interferon. Some perform very important functions, including regulatory roles.
However, you cannot express animal or other human endogenous viruses without risking recombinants and new viruses. Hence, when vaccines are contaminated with animal retroviruses, you risk creating brand new viruses that can cause all sorts of harm.
What Is the Hidden Agenda?
In summary, Mikovits and Ruscetti’s work demonstrates an important principle, which is that viruses do not travel alone. They travel in groups, and while one may affect one part of the immune system, another type will produce other immune responses. The end result is what we diagnose as the acquired immune dysfunction or deficiency.
For example, HIV alone does not cause AIDS. To develop AIDS, you need multiple environmental toxins like glyphosate, aluminum or a coinfection of HIV and XMRVs. Again, XMRVs are found in vaccines that have been grown in animal tissue.
The XMRVs cripple your innate immune system, including your natural killer (NK) cells. This then allows the HIV to take out your adaptive immune system, the T and B cells, resulting in disease progression and if left untreated, death. In CFS, the primary coinfection is that of XMRVs and herpes viruses.
Mikovits believes those who are most susceptible to dying from the COVID shots are those who are already coinfected with XMRV, HIV, Borrelia, Babesia and other pathogens commonly acquired from contaminated vaccines.
Mikovits is convinced that what is now being called “long-haul COVID” is the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein activating and recombining with XMRVs — introduced via vaccinations — and the HIV virus. She also believes those who are most susceptible to dying from the COVID shots are those who are already coinfected with XMRV, HIV, Borrelia, Babesia and other pathogens commonly acquired from contaminated vaccines.
What this all means, then, is that in order to protect yourself against the disease, you cannot focus on protecting yourself against a single virus. The answer is to make sure your immune system is strong enough to take on whatever it encounters. Absolutely never get another inoculation of any vaccines until all of the appropriate testing is done and the contaminants removed, as they should have been decades ago.
That's why the pandemic measures have been so detrimental. Mask wearing, sheltering indoors and staying in a state of perpetual fear all dampen your immune function. The question is, why did those in charge make sure they did everything to lower our immune defenses?
“For me personally, it is the best evidence that this was not simply a series of mistakes by those in charge,” Heckenlively says. “There had to be some other agenda. I'm trained as an attorney. I have people lie to me all the time. I'm always questioning people and I look at what's done. Can I prove it? No, but it seems like an amazing pattern of mistakes to just be the result of stupidity or politics.”
Profiling COVID-19
What do we know about the people who have died from COVID-19? We know they're elderly. We know that they have 2.6 comorbidities. What Mikovits, Ruscetti and Heckenlively are saying is that for the past 60 years, we've been injecting animal viruses into human beings, and the assertion made in “Plague of Corruption” is that this practice has caused many of these chronic diseases in people.
This reality has been covered up, however, which is why many are now hearing about this for the very first time. Along comes SARS-CoV-2, triggering terrible immune system reactions in those who are already infected with these animal viruses.
The coinfections are ultimately what’s killing them. Essentially, SARS-CoV-2 is acting like the executioner of people who are already sick with chronic diseases caused by animal retroviruses, other pathogens and toxins introduced through vaccinations.
Add to this the COVID shots. These injections make your cells produce a synthetic spike protein (a synthetic virus envelope) that has pathological effects. The reason why the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is so dangerous is because it contains the envelope proteins of three of the most harmful viruses: the HIV family, the XMRV family and the SARS family of viruses.
All of them are now rolled into one, and the instructions to produce this synthetic pathogen are now being injected into hundreds of millions of people. What can go wrong? As explained by Mikovits, the XMRVs and HIV were incorporated by growing the SARS-CoV-2 virus in the Vero E6 cell line.
Related to HIV is the simian immune deficiency virus (SIV), and it too is found in the Vero monkey cell line, part of the endogenous viral genome of monkeys. SIV and HIV have overlapping envelope proteins, so they produce the same inflammatory immune response.
Ending Plague
“Ending Plague” goes deep into the history of all this and provides a framework for understanding how something so devastating and disruptive could happen now, in 2021. The basis of this has a lot to do with the actions of Fauci and Robert Gallo, Ph.D. Fauci, for example, was responsible for discrediting all AIDS treatments other than AZT — the drug that he sponsored.
He kept insisting that more randomized controlled trials were needed, yet he held the purse strings and refused to fund the very studies he claimed were required to prove these other treatments. AZT meanwhile, cost $5 to make and was sold for $10,000 per dose. AZT wound up killing some 330,000 people due to its toxicity.
The very same pattern is playing out today with COVID-19, and Fauci is again playing a lead role. Is that really a coincidence? He’s been warning against the use of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, and he’s downplayed the importance of vitamin D sufficiency and any number of other things. According to Fauci, the COVID “vaccine” is the only way forward, and now we’re seeing thousands of people around the world dying within weeks of their injections.
In “Ending Plague,” the three coauthors review how we can reform public health to get us out of this mess, once and for all. “I think that the scholar's obligation in an age of corruption is to tell the truth and make the world a better place,” Heckenlively says, adding:
“These books that I helped Judy, Frank and others put together, these are really stories of defectors from science. In them we see the destruction of the old order and the creation of something new and wonderful.
We're not just saying things are terrible. We are talking about how to bring about change. That's why it's so important that people buy these books because, I hate to say it, sales are power for people like Judy, Frank and me, to continue our message.”
I've read two of her books, pretty interesting story.

I believe all womenz! at least this one seems to be telling a truth, not sure she has all the angles covedc yet.

I did hear an interview recently she did where she was toned down on a medication for relaxation? pot? her handlers probably told her she goes too fast and gets too excited, these seem to be traits she exhibits because she has truth in her?!
 

anti-barabas-ite

Work stuff through in your brain...UNVAXXED
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
Escaped True Master

anti-barabas-ite

Work stuff through in your brain...UNVAXXED
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
Escaped True Master

Dr Reiner Fuellmich declares he is speechless in response to the level of criminality surrounding the treatment of patients in the US as prescribed by the CDC via Anthony Fauci. Testimony of Dr Bryan Ardis, CEO of ArdisLabs.com

Dr Ardis also warns of a side effect listed on FDA slide 16 in October 2020 called 'Multi-System Inflammatory Syndrome in children' abbreviated as MIS-C. "This is a brand new disease that's only been ever created and given a diagnostic code since 2020."
 

Amerikaner

Well-known member
Cave Beast
⏰☕
I'm confused why everyone is trying to explain covid with long explanations and article links. The word covid is an acronym that has nothing to do with a virus.

C.O.V.I.D. = Certificate of Vaccine Identification

As soon as they changed the name from corona virus to covid I LOL'd, it was so in your face. And I knew forced vaccines were coming. There is no new corona virus or any variant, period. It's time to start shutting down these short bus aficionados whenever it's mentioned. It's beyond retarded at this point.

If I'm wrong, prove it. Where did the word covid come from? Justify the name with something more logical than what I'm presenting. Explain why you're parroting the news from people who clearly had nefarious intentions from the start.
 

Idiosyncratic mind

Idiosycratic
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽
For all that is written on this thread, there is one proverb to summarize this entire problem.
Eyes are useless when the mind is blind.
Everyone here knows this is wrong. But when you go to the doctor's office and he questions you about NOT taking the vaccine?? What will you say??? I'll tell you what the doctor said to my friend. He is twenty-five years into his profession, and he wants his retirement. And.....wait for this.....wait....wait.......
He wanted to go to Mexico on vacation.
So all the edumacation in the world won't stop what is going to happen to us next.
 

anti-barabas-ite

Work stuff through in your brain...UNVAXXED
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
Escaped True Master
Dr Reiner Fuellmich declares he is speechless in response to the level of criminality surrounding the treatment of patients in the US as prescribed by the CDC via Anthony Fauci. Testimony of Dr Bryan Ardis, CEO of ArdisLabs.com

Dr Ardis also warns of a side effect listed on FDA slide 16 in October 2020 called 'Multi-System Inflammatory Syndrome in children' abbreviated as MIS-C. "This is a brand new disease that's only been ever created and given a diagnostic code since 2020."
 

anti-barabas-ite

Work stuff through in your brain...UNVAXXED
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
Escaped True Master
The thread is informational

Me and Don Draper are not here to convert you you either have Jesus Christ in your heart or you don't
 
Last edited:

anti-barabas-ite

Work stuff through in your brain...UNVAXXED
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
Escaped True Master

snip
The FCS is significant. To gain entry into your cells, the virus must first bind to an ACE2 or CD147 receptor on the cell. Next, the S2 spike protein subunit must be proteolytically cleaved (cut). Without this protein cleavage, the virus would simply attach to the receptor and not get any further. “The furin site is why the virus is so transmissible, and why it invades the heart, the brain and the blood vessels,” Dr. Steven Quay explained.7

While furin cleavage sites do exist in other viruses like Ebola, HIV, zika and yellow fever, they’re not naturally found in coronaviruses, which is one reason why researchers have called the furin cleavage site the “smoking gun” that proves SARS-CoV-2 was created in a lab. The entire group of coronaviruses to which SARS-CoV-2 belongs does not contain a single example of a furin cleavage site, Quay said.
end snip
 

MeanMaster

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
June 9, 2021

Dear Dr. Fauci:

House Republicans remain concerned about the origins of COVID-19, including the increasing possibility it originated and subsequently leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China.

At a 2012 conference entitled “Gain-of-Function Research on HPA1 H5N1 Viruses,” you said, “[w]hat historically investigators have done is to actually create gain-of-function by making mutations, passage adoption, or other genetic techniques, such as reverse genetics.”

In 2014, you, through the National Institutes of Health (NIH) awarded EcoHealth Alliance, Inc. (EcoHealth) a grant entitled “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence.” This grant allowed EcoHealth to “[t]est predictions of [coronavirus]…transmission…using reverse genetics…”Funds from this grant were subsequently awarded to the WIV. Using your own definition, it appears the NIH funded gain-of-function research at the WIV.

On May 11, 2021, while testifying under oath, you stated, “[t]he NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the [WIV].” This appears to contradict your 2012 statement regarding gain-of-function research and the WIV.

Can you please confirm the authenticity of the 2012 video accessible on the YouTube platform? Further, please verify that the 2014 grant description is accurate and explain the apparent discrepancy in your recent testimony?

The Committee on Oversight and Reform is the principal oversight committee of the U.S. House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X. Thank you in advance for your cooperation with this inquiry.

Sincerely,

James Comer, Ranking Member, Committee on Oversight and Reform

Jim Jordan, Ranking Member, Committee on the Judiciary

-----------

Anthony Fauci and the Pause on US Government funding for Gain-Of-Function Studies involving Influenza, MERS, and SARS viruses from October 2014 to December 2017.

Overview by Tucker Carlson

Friday, January 31st. 2020

1628984862539.png

///
From: Kristian G. Andersen
Sent: January 31, 2020 10:32 PM
To: Fauci, Anthony (NIH/NIAIO)
Cc: Jeremy Farrar; (?)
Subject: Re. FWD: Science Mining coronavirus genomes for clues to the outbreak's origins

Hi Tony,
Thanks for sharing. Yes, I saw this earlier today and both Eddie and myself are actually quoted in it. It's a great article, but the problem is that our phylogenetic analyses aren't ably to answer whether the sequences are unusual at individual residues, except if they are completely off. On a phylogenetic tree the virus looks totally normal and the close clustering with bats suggests that bats service as the reservoir.


The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome (<0.1%) so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered.
///

The above email (made public via the Freedom of Information Act), subject "Science Mining coronavirus genomes for clues to the outbreak's origins", reveals that Dr. Kristian Andersen (of the Scripps Research Institute) wrote Anthony Fauci on January 31, 2020 to informed him that "... some of the features (potentially) look engineered."

Saturday, February 1st. 2020

1628984862707.jpg
///
32221/3234 (FOIA Fauci email release)
From: Fauci, Anthony
Sent: February I, 2020 12:29 AM
To: Auchincloss, Hugh
Subject: IMPORTANT
Attachments:
Barie, Shi et al - Nature medicine - SARS Gain of function.pdf

Hugh:
It is essential that we speak this AM. Keep your cell phone on. I have a conference call at
7:45 AM with Azar. It likely will be over at 8:45 AM. Read this paper as well as the e-mail that I will forward to you now. You will have tasks today that must be done.
Thanks,
Tony

///

What is "Baric, Shi et al - Nature medicine - SARS Gain of function.pdf?

Dr. Ralph Baric
is a leading coronavirus researcher and one of the pioneers of gain-of-function research involving coronaviruses funded by grants from NIAID and NIH.

Zhengli Shi is the Director of the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases at the taxpayer-funded Wuhan Institute of Virology.

According to Reps. Chip Roy (TX-21) and Bill Posey (FL-8), along with several of their House Republican colleagues, the only paper co-authored by these scientists in Nature Medicine is “SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence(2015)"

SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence

This paper described creating a chimeric virus capable of infecting humans. The exact text:

“Using the SARS-CoV reverse genetics system2, we generated and characterized a chimeric virus expressing the spike of bat coronavirus SHC014 in a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV backbone. The results indicate that group 2b viruses encoding the SHC014 spike in a wild-type backbone can efficiently use multiple orthologs of the SARS receptor human angiotensin converting enzyme II (ACE2), replicate efficiently in primary human airway cells and achieve in vitro titers equivalent to epidemic strains of SARS-CoV.”

It also stated:

"These studies were initiated before the US Government Deliberative Process Research Funding Pause on Selected Gain-of-Function Research Involving Influenza, MERS and SARS Viruses. This paper has been reviewed by the funding agency, the NIH. Continuation of these studies was requested, and this has been approved by the NIH."

At the end of that paper, the authors thank..

“Dr. Zhengli-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology for access to bat CoV sequences and plasmid of WIV1-CoV spike protein.” They also specify that the research was supported by the NIAID under the grant U19AI107810."

According to Dr.Hugh Auchincloss, however, (responding to Fauci's February 1, 2020 email) no funding was approved for gain-of-function research by the National Institute of Health during the Federal mandated pause.

///
3206/3234
From: Fauci, Anthony
Sent: February 1, 2020 5:51PM
To: Auchincloss, Hugh
Subject : RE: Continued

OK. Stay tuned.

-----Original Message-----

From : Auchincloss, Hugh
Sent: February 1, 2020 11:47AM
To: Fauci, Anthony
Subject: Continued

The paper you sent me says the experiments were performed before the gain of function pause but have since been reviewed and approved by NIH. Not sure what that means since Emily is sure that no Coronavirus work has gone through the P3 framework. She will try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work abroad.

///

Dr. Auchincloss's statement then raises a serious question.

Who approved - and who funded - NIAID grant U19AI107810?
1628984862802.jpg

In a May 11, 2021, Senate hearing, Sen. Rand Paul questioned Fauci on the NIAID’s funding of GOF research on bat corona viruses, some of which was conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).

Fauci denied the charge, claiming:

“The NIH has not ever, and does not now, fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute.”

In March 2021 the WIV deleted mentions of its collaboration with the NIAID/NIH and other American research partners from its website. It also deleted descriptions of GOF on the SARS virus.

Thanks to Archive.org, here is part of the deleted material:

"The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-CoV underscores the threat of cross-species transmission events leading to outbreaks in humans.

Recently, Prof. Zhengli Shi and Xingyi Ge from WIV, in cooperation with researchers from University of North Carolina, Harvard Medical School, Bellinzona Institute of Microbiology and etc, examine the disease potential of a SARS-like virus, SHC014-CoV, which is currently circulating in Chinese horseshoe bat populations. Using the SARS-CoV reverse genetics system, the scientists generated and characterized a chimeric virus expressing the spike of bat coronavirus SHC014 in a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV backbone. The results indicate that group 2b viruses encoding the SHC014 spike in a wild-type backbone can efficiently use multiple orthologs of the SARS receptor human angiotensin converting enzyme II (ACE2), replicate efficiently in primary human airway cells and achieve in vitro titers equivalent to epidemic strains of SARS-CoV. Evaluation of available SARS-based immune-therapeutic and prophylactic modalities revealed poor efficacy; both monoclonal antibody and vaccine approaches failed to neutralize and protect from infection with CoVs using the novel spike protein.

On the basis of these findings, they synthetically re-derived an infectious full-length SHC014 recombinant virus and demonstrate robust viral replication both in vitro and in vivo. The work suggests a potential risk of SARS-CoV re-emergence from viruses currently circulating in bat populations."

When Paul asked Fauci if the NIAID funded Dr. Ralph Baric’s GOF research, Fauci claimed Baric “does not do gain-of-function research, and if it is, it is according to the guidelines and is being conducted in North Carolina.”

Paul shot back, saying:

“You don’t think turning a bat virus spike protein, that he got from the Wuhan Institute into the SARS virus, is gain-of-function? You’d be in a minority, because at least 200 scientists have signed a statement from the Cambridge Working Group that it is gain-of-function.”

lol..

Further dispelling Fauci's denial is the October 21th, 2014, letter from the Department of Health and Human Services to the director of proposals at UNC Chapel Hill. It authorized the continuation of what it admitted was gain-of-function research and it did so after the ban on such funding was put into place, stating as follows:

“NIAID has determined that the above referenced grant may include Gain of Function (GOF) research that is subject to the recently-announced U.S. Government funding pause …

The following specific aims appear to involve research covered under the pause:

Project 1: Role of Uncharacterized Genes in High Pathogenic Human Coronavirus Infect — Ralph S. Baric, Ph.D. — Project Leader.

“Specific Aim 1. Novel Functions in virus replication in vitro.
Specific Aim 3. Novel functions in virus pathogenesis in vivo …

As your grant is currently funded, this pause is voluntary.”

1628984862875.jpg

Notice it identified Dr.Ralph S. Baric as Project Leader and funded by grant U19AI107810.

1628984862963.jpg
Ralph Baric and his team @Baric_Lab – Researching #SARSCoV2, SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, Dengue, Zika, and human norovirus at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

Sunday, March 8th. 2020

1628984863056.jpg

///
2401/3234
From: (Fauchi)
Sent: March 8, 2020 9:23AM
To: Kristian G. Andersen
Cc: Jeremy Farrar; Collins, Francis; Robert Garry; Edward Holmes; Andrew Rambaut; Ian Lipkin; Chris Emery
Subject: Re: SARS-CoV-2 article to be published in Nature Medicine

Kristian:

Thanks for your note. Nice job on The Paper.

Tony

-----Original Message----

From: Kristian G. Andersen
Sent: March 6, 2020 4:23 PM
To: Anthony Fauci
Cc: Jeremy Farrar; Collins, Francis; Robert Garry; Edward Holmes; Andrew Rambaut; Ian Lipkin; Chris Emery


Dear Jeremy, Tony, and Francis

Thank you again for your advice and leadership as we have been working through the SARS-CoV-2 'origins' paper. We're happy to say that the paper was just accepted by Nature Medicine and should be published shortly (not quite sure when). To keep you in the loop, I just wanted to share the accepted version with you, as well as a draft press release. We're still waiting for proofs, so please let me know if you have any comments , suggestions, or questions about the paper or the press release.

Tony, thank you for your straight talk on CNN last night - it's being noticed.

Best,
Kristian
///


The above email identifies Tony Fauci, Francis Collins and Jeremy Farrar as co-conspiritors to distract from the paper SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence, by devising this paper and attributing it's authorship to Kristian G. Andersen. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2

What does it mean?

The author of the Nature Medicine paper (Andersen) thanks three people for their “advice and leadership” regarding a paper pushing the natural origin theory of SARS-CoV-2. These three people dole out more money for medical research than anyone else in the world, perhaps excepting Bill Gates.

It means conspiracy and people are starting to catch on.

July 29, 2021

Dear Director Fauci:

On June 9, 2021, we wrote to you to provide you an opportunity to clarify an apparent discrepancy in your sworn congressional testimony regarding National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) funding of gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). You failed to respond.

On July 20, 2021, you testified, again, that NIAID never funded dangerous gain-of-function research at the WIV. New emails make this recurring testimony even more concerning and show a closer relationship between NIAID and the WIV than previously known.

1. NIAID funded work at the WIV. On February 1, 2020, you emailed the Deputy Director of NIAID, Dr. Hugh Auchincloss, a research paper entitled, “A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronavirus shows potential for human emergence” [hereinafter WIV Paper]. This paper was primarily authored by Dr. Ralph Baric and Dr. Li-Zhengli Shi⎯a bat coronavirus expert from the WIV.In fact, the WIV is listed as a “Key Laboratory of Special Pathogens and Biosafety” in the paper. This work was funded by NIAID grant U19AI107810. Drs. Baric and Shi acknowledge this.

2. This work was gain-of-function research. There is no need to conduct a scientific analysis of this paper to determine whether or not it constituted gain-of-function; you state it in your email to Dr. Auchincloss and it states it in the paper itself. The attachment line of your February 1, 2020 email to Dr. Auchincloss stated, “Baric, Shi et al – Nature Medicine – SARS Gain of Function.pdf.” Additionally, the paper itself stated, “[e]xperiments with the full-length and chimeric SHC014 recombinant viruses were initiated and performed before the [gain-of-function] research funding pause and haves since been reviewed and approved for continued study by the [National Institute of Health] (NIH).”

3. This work did not go through proper oversight. Drs. Baric and Shi claim their gain-of-function research conducted with American taxpayer dollars in the WIV was “reviewed and approved for continued study by the NIH.” Your Deputy, Dr.Auchincloss, disagrees. On February 1, 2020, Dr. Auchincloss emailed you and said, “[t]he [WIV Paper] says the experiments were performed before the gain of function pause but have since been reviewed and approved by NIH. Not sure what that means since [we are] sure that no Coronavirus work has gone through the P3 framework.” This statement directly refutes the authors’ claims and raises serious questions as to who approved dangerous gain-of-function research to take place in the WIV.

In short, NIAID funded gain-of-function research at the WIV and this research did not go through the proper oversight. It is unclear why you would continue to testify otherwise. We therefore ask you again to please clarify what you meant when you said twice⎯under oath⎯“[t]he NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the [WIV].”

To schedule a time to discuss this important topic or ask any follow-up or related questions, please contact Committee on Oversight and Reform staff at (...).

Under House Rule X, the Committee on Oversight and Reform as the principal oversight committee of the U.S. House of Representatives with broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time.”

Thank you in advance for your cooperation with this inquiry.

Sincerely,

James Comer, Ranking Member, Committee on Oversight and Reform

Jim Jordan, Ranking Member, Committee on the Judiciary

cc: The Honorable Carolyn Maloney, Chairwoman, Committee on Oversight and Reform

The Honorable Jerrold Nadler, Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary


The Players

Anthony (Tony) Fauci
runs the NIAID
Francis Collins is the NIH Director (Fauci’s boss)
Jeremy Farrar (Sir) is the Chair of the WHO R&D Blueprint Scientific Advisory Group and the Director of the Wellcome Trust.
The Wellcome Trust is a charitable foundation, in the United Kingdom (est. 1936), with a financial endowment of £29.1 billion in 2020. Making it the fourth wealthiest charitable foundation in the world.
Dr. Hugh Auchincloss, NIAID Principal Deputy Director (Fauci's underling)
Dr. Ralph Baric is a leading coronavirus researcher and one of the pioneers of gain-of-function research involving coronaviruses funded by grants from NIAID and NIH.
Zhengli Shi is the Director of the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases at the taxpayer-funded Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Emily Erbelding, the director of the NIH’s division of microbiology and infectious diseases,
 
Last edited:

CrackSmokeRepublican

An ancient story of Fhunter Xiden...and the pipe.
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
June 9, 2021

Dear Dr. Fauci:

House Republicans remain concerned about the origins of COVID-19, including the increasing possibility it originated and subsequently leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China.

At a 2012 conference entitled “Gain-of-Function Research on HPA1 H5N1 Viruses,” you said, “[w]hat historically investigators have done is to actually create gain-of-function by making mutations, passage adoption, or other genetic techniques, such as reverse genetics.”

In 2014, you, through the National Institutes of Health (NIH) awarded EcoHealth Alliance, Inc. (EcoHealth) a grant entitled “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence.” This grant allowed EcoHealth to “[t]est predictions of [coronavirus]…transmission…using reverse genetics…”Funds from this grant were subsequently awarded to the WIV. Using your own definition, it appears the NIH funded gain-of-function research at the WIV.

On May 11, 2021, while testifying under oath, you stated, “[t]he NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the [WIV].” This appears to contradict your 2012 statement regarding gain-of-function research and the WIV.

Can you please confirm the authenticity of the 2012 video accessible on the YouTube platform? Further, please verify that the 2014 grant description is accurate and explain the apparent discrepancy in your recent testimony?

The Committee on Oversight and Reform is the principal oversight committee of the U.S. House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X. Thank you in advance for your cooperation with this inquiry.

Sincerely,

James Comer, Ranking Member, Committee on Oversight and Reform

Jim Jordan, Ranking Member, Committee on the Judiciary

-----------

Anthony Fauci and the Pause on US Government funding for Gain-Of-Function Studies involving Influenza, MERS, and SARS viruses from October 2014 to December 2017.

Overview by Tucker Carlson

Friday, January 31st. 2020

View attachment 62275

///
From: Kristian G. Andersen
Sent: January 31, 2020 10:32 PM
To: Fauci, Anthony (NIH/NIAIO)
Cc: Jeremy Farrar; (?)
Subject: Re. FWD: Science Mining coronavirus genomes for clues to the outbreak's origins

Hi Tony,
Thanks for sharing. Yes, I saw this earlier today and both Eddie and myself are actually quoted in it. It's a great article, but the problem is that our phylogenetic analyses aren't ably to answer whether the sequences are unusual at individual residues, except if they are completely off. On a phylogenetic tree the virus looks totally normal and the close clustering with bats suggests that bats service as the reservoir.


The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome (<0.1%) so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered.
///

The above email (made public via the Freedom of Information Act), subject "Science Mining coronavirus genomes for clues to the outbreak's origins", reveals that Dr. Kristian Andersen (of the Scripps Research Institute) wrote Anthony Fauci on January 31, 2020 to informed him that "... some of the features (potentially) look engineered."

Saturday, February 1st. 2020

View attachment 62277
///
32221/3234 (FOIA Fauci email release)
From: Fauci, Anthony
Sent: February I, 2020 12:29 AM
To: Auchincloss, Hugh
Subject: IMPORTANT
Attachments:
Barie, Shi et al - Nature medicine - SARS Gain of function.pdf

Hugh:
It is essential that we speak this AM. Keep your cell phone on. I have a conference call at
7:45 AM with Azar. It likely will be over at 8:45 AM. Read this paper as well as the e-mail that I will forward to you now. You will have tasks today that must be done.
Thanks,
Tony

///

What is "Baric, Shi et al - Nature medicine - SARS Gain of function.pdf?

Dr. Ralph Baric
is a leading coronavirus researcher and one of the pioneers of gain-of-function research involving coronaviruses funded by grants from NIAID and NIH.

Zhengli Shi is the Director of the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases at the taxpayer-funded Wuhan Institute of Virology.

According to Reps. Chip Roy (TX-21) and Bill Posey (FL-8), along with several of their House Republican colleagues, the only paper co-authored by these scientists in Nature Medicine is “SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence(2015)"

SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence

This paper described creating a chimeric virus capable of infecting humans. The exact text:

“Using the SARS-CoV reverse genetics system2, we generated and characterized a chimeric virus expressing the spike of bat coronavirus SHC014 in a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV backbone. The results indicate that group 2b viruses encoding the SHC014 spike in a wild-type backbone can efficiently use multiple orthologs of the SARS receptor human angiotensin converting enzyme II (ACE2), replicate efficiently in primary human airway cells and achieve in vitro titers equivalent to epidemic strains of SARS-CoV.”

It also stated:

"These studies were initiated before the US Government Deliberative Process Research Funding Pause on Selected Gain-of-Function Research Involving Influenza, MERS and SARS Viruses. This paper has been reviewed by the funding agency, the NIH. Continuation of these studies was requested, and this has been approved by the NIH."

At the end of that paper, the authors thank..

“Dr. Zhengli-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology for access to bat CoV sequences and plasmid of WIV1-CoV spike protein.” They also specify that the research was supported by the NIAID under the grant U19AI107810."

According to Dr.Hugh Auchincloss, however, (responding to Fauci's February 1, 2020 email) no funding was approved for gain-of-function research by the National Institute of Health during the Federal mandated pause.

///
3206/3234
From: Fauci, Anthony
Sent: February 1, 2020 5:51PM
To: Auchincloss, Hugh
Subject : RE: Continued

OK. Stay tuned.

-----Original Message-----

From : Auchincloss, Hugh
Sent: February 1, 2020 11:47AM
To: Fauci, Anthony
Subject: Continued

The paper you sent me says the experiments were performed before the gain of function pause but have since been reviewed and approved by NIH. Not sure what that means since Emily is sure that no Coronavirus work has gone through the P3 framework. She will try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work abroad.

///

Dr. Auchincloss's statement then raises a serious question.

Who approved - and who funded - NIAID grant U19AI107810?
View attachment 62278

In a May 11, 2021, Senate hearing, Sen. Rand Paul questioned Fauci on the NIAID’s funding of GOF research on bat corona viruses, some of which was conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).

Fauci denied the charge, claiming:

“The NIH has not ever, and does not now, fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute.”

In March 2021 the WIV deleted mentions of its collaboration with the NIAID/NIH and other American research partners from its website. It also deleted descriptions of GOF on the SARS virus.

Thanks to Archive.org, here is part of the deleted material:

"The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-CoV underscores the threat of cross-species transmission events leading to outbreaks in humans.

Recently, Prof. Zhengli Shi and Xingyi Ge from WIV, in cooperation with researchers from University of North Carolina, Harvard Medical School, Bellinzona Institute of Microbiology and etc, examine the disease potential of a SARS-like virus, SHC014-CoV, which is currently circulating in Chinese horseshoe bat populations. Using the SARS-CoV reverse genetics system, the scientists generated and characterized a chimeric virus expressing the spike of bat coronavirus SHC014 in a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV backbone. The results indicate that group 2b viruses encoding the SHC014 spike in a wild-type backbone can efficiently use multiple orthologs of the SARS receptor human angiotensin converting enzyme II (ACE2), replicate efficiently in primary human airway cells and achieve in vitro titers equivalent to epidemic strains of SARS-CoV. Evaluation of available SARS-based immune-therapeutic and prophylactic modalities revealed poor efficacy; both monoclonal antibody and vaccine approaches failed to neutralize and protect from infection with CoVs using the novel spike protein.

On the basis of these findings, they synthetically re-derived an infectious full-length SHC014 recombinant virus and demonstrate robust viral replication both in vitro and in vivo. The work suggests a potential risk of SARS-CoV re-emergence from viruses currently circulating in bat populations."

When Paul asked Fauci if the NIAID funded Dr. Ralph Baric’s GOF research, Fauci claimed Baric “does not do gain-of-function research, and if it is, it is according to the guidelines and is being conducted in North Carolina.”

Paul shot back, saying:

“You don’t think turning a bat virus spike protein, that he got from the Wuhan Institute into the SARS virus, is gain-of-function? You’d be in a minority, because at least 200 scientists have signed a statement from the Cambridge Working Group that it is gain-of-function.”

lol..

Further dispelling Fauci's denial is the October 21th, 2014, letter from the Department of Health and Human Services to the director of proposals at UNC Chapel Hill. It authorized the continuation of what it admitted was gain-of-function research and it did so after the ban on such funding was put into place, stating as follows:

“NIAID has determined that the above referenced grant may include Gain of Function (GOF) research that is subject to the recently-announced U.S. Government funding pause …

The following specific aims appear to involve research covered under the pause:

Project 1: Role of Uncharacterized Genes in High Pathogenic Human Coronavirus Infect — Ralph S. Baric, Ph.D. — Project Leader.

“Specific Aim 1. Novel Functions in virus replication in vitro.
Specific Aim 3. Novel functions in virus pathogenesis in vivo …

As your grant is currently funded, this pause is voluntary.”

View attachment 62279

Notice it identified Dr.Ralph S. Baric as Project Leader and funded by grant U19AI107810.

View attachment 62280
Ralph Baric and his team @Baric_Lab – Researching #SARSCoV2, SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, Dengue, Zika, and human norovirus at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

Sunday, March 8th. 2020

View attachment 62281

///
2401/3234
From: (Fauchi)
Sent: March 8, 2020 9:23AM
To: Kristian G. Andersen
Cc: Jeremy Farrar; Collins, Francis; Robert Garry; Edward Holmes; Andrew Rambaut; Ian Lipkin; Chris Emery
Subject: Re: SARS-CoV-2 article to be published in Nature Medicine

Kristian:

Thanks for your note. Nice job on The Paper.

Tony

-----Original Message----

From: Kristian G. Andersen
Sent: March 6, 2020 4:23 PM
To: Anthony Fauci
Cc: Jeremy Farrar; Collins, Francis; Robert Garry; Edward Holmes; Andrew Rambaut; Ian Lipkin; Chris Emery


Dear Jeremy, Tony, and Francis

Thank you again for your advice and leadership as we have been working through the SARS-CoV-2 'origins' paper. We're happy to say that the paper was just accepted by Nature Medicine and should be published shortly (not quite sure when). To keep you in the loop, I just wanted to share the accepted version with you, as well as a draft press release. We're still waiting for proofs, so please let me know if you have any comments , suggestions, or questions about the paper or the press release.

Tony, thank you for your straight talk on CNN last night - it's being noticed.

Best,
Kristian
///


The above email identifies Tony Fauci, Francis Collins and Jeremy Farrar as co-conspiritors to distract from the paper SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence, by devising this paper and attributing it's authorship to Kristian G. Andersen. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2

What does it mean?

The author of the Nature Medicine paper (Andersen) thanks three people for their “advice and leadership” regarding a paper pushing the natural origin theory of SARS-CoV-2. These three people dole out more money for medical research than anyone else in the world, perhaps excepting Bill Gates.

It means conspiracy and people are starting to catch on.

July 29, 2021

Dear Director Fauci:

On June 9, 2021, we wrote to you to provide you an opportunity to clarify an apparent discrepancy in your sworn congressional testimony regarding National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) funding of gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). You failed to respond.

On July 20, 2021, you testified, again, that NIAID never funded dangerous gain-of-function research at the WIV. New emails make this recurring testimony even more concerning and show a closer relationship between NIAID and the WIV than previously known.

1. NIAID funded work at the WIV. On February 1, 2020, you emailed the Deputy Director of NIAID, Dr. Hugh Auchincloss, a research paper entitled, “A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronavirus shows potential for human emergence” [hereinafter WIV Paper]. This paper was primarily authored by Dr. Ralph Baric and Dr. Li-Zhengli Shi⎯a bat coronavirus expert from the WIV.In fact, the WIV is listed as a “Key Laboratory of Special Pathogens and Biosafety” in the paper. This work was funded by NIAID grant U19AI107810. Drs. Baric and Shi acknowledge this.

2. This work was gain-of-function research. There is no need to conduct a scientific analysis of this paper to determine whether or not it constituted gain-of-function; you state it in your email to Dr. Auchincloss and it states it in the paper itself. The attachment line of your February 1, 2020 email to Dr. Auchincloss stated, “Baric, Shi et al – Nature Medicine – SARS Gain of Function.pdf.” Additionally, the paper itself stated, “[e]xperiments with the full-length and chimeric SHC014 recombinant viruses were initiated and performed before the [gain-of-function] research funding pause and haves since been reviewed and approved for continued study by the [National Institute of Health] (NIH).”

3. This work did not go through proper oversight. Drs. Baric and Shi claim their gain-of-function research conducted with American taxpayer dollars in the WIV was “reviewed and approved for continued study by the NIH.” Your Deputy, Dr.Auchincloss, disagrees. On February 1, 2020, Dr. Auchincloss emailed you and said, “[t]he [WIV Paper] says the experiments were performed before the gain of function pause but have since been reviewed and approved by NIH. Not sure what that means since [we are] sure that no Coronavirus work has gone through the P3 framework.” This statement directly refutes the authors’ claims and raises serious questions as to who approved dangerous gain-of-function research to take place in the WIV.

In short, NIAID funded gain-of-function research at the WIV and this research did not go through the proper oversight. It is unclear why you would continue to testify otherwise. We therefore ask you again to please clarify what you meant when you said twice⎯under oath⎯“[t]he NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the [WIV].”

To schedule a time to discuss this important topic or ask any follow-up or related questions, please contact Committee on Oversight and Reform staff at (...).

Under House Rule X, the Committee on Oversight and Reform as the principal oversight committee of the U.S. House of Representatives with broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time.”

Thank you in advance for your cooperation with this inquiry.

Sincerely,

James Comer, Ranking Member, Committee on Oversight and Reform

Jim Jordan, Ranking Member, Committee on the Judiciary

cc: The Honorable Carolyn Maloney, Chairwoman, Committee on Oversight and Reform

The Honorable Jerrold Nadler, Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary


The Players

Anthony (Tony) Fauci
runs the NIAID
Francis Collins is the NIH Director (Fauci’s boss)
Jeremy Farrar (Sir) is the Chair of the WHO R&D Blueprint Scientific Advisory Group and the Director of the Wellcome Trust.
The Wellcome Trust is a charitable foundation, in the United Kingdom (est. 1936), with a financial endowment of £29.1 billion in 2020. Making it the fourth wealthiest charitable foundation in the world.
Dr. Hugh Auchincloss, NIAID Principal Deputy Director (Fauci's underling)
Dr. Ralph Baric is a leading coronavirus researcher and one of the pioneers of gain-of-function research involving coronaviruses funded by grants from NIAID and NIH.
Zhengli Shi is the Director of the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases at the taxpayer-funded Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Emily Erbelding, the director of the NIH’s division of microbiology and infectious diseases,
Good stuff MeanMaster...frankly if "Spike proteins" were seen in their lab development for "Gain of Function" they are literally "Damned" and don't want this "secret" out. Really the question I'm looking at now is "What is the Natural source of "Spike Proteins (S)?" Was it in cave bats...and transcribed onto humans? What was the engineering behind it...if it was fully "natural" show us the slides/signatures to show this "natural progression". In my book...they had a "vial drop" at some point whether intentional or not...that lead to the "spike protein" release. Fauci needs to own this on his name.
 

MeanMaster

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
Good stuff MeanMaster...frankly if "Spike proteins" were seen in their lab development for "Gain of Function" they are literally "Damned" and don't want this "secret" out. Really the question I'm looking at now is "What is the Natural source of "Spike Proteins (S)?" Was it in cave bats...and transcribed onto humans? What was the engineering behind it...if it was fully "natural" show us the slides/signatures to show this "natural progression". In my book...they had a "vial drop" at some point whether intentional or not...that lead to the "spike protein" release. Fauci needs to own this on his name.
If you follow this link you'll find a paper published on January 31,3020. That's the same day as Dr. Anderson's email to Fauci, where he alluded to "Science Mining coronavirus genomes for clues to the outbreak's origins". Maybe it's related. Check it out and give me some feedback.
 

CrackSmokeRepublican

An ancient story of Fhunter Xiden...and the pipe.
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
If you follow this link you'll find a paper published on January 31,3020. That's the same day as Dr. Anderson's email to Fauci, where he alluded to "Science Mining coronavirus genomes for clues to the outbreak's origins". Maybe it's related. Check it out and give me some feedback.
That's interesting MeanMaster... looks like Fauci the literal God-Father behind HIV-1 knew a little too much:
-----------------
The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV, all of which have identity /similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature. This work provides yet unknown insights on 2019-nCoV and sheds light on the evolution and pathogenicity of this virus with important implications for diagnosis of this virus.

https://www.biorxiv .org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v1
 

MeanMaster

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
That's interesting MeanMaster... looks like Fauci the literal God-Father behind HIV-1 knew a little too much:
-----------------
The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV, all of which have identity /similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature. This work provides yet unknown insights on 2019-nCoV and sheds light on the evolution and pathogenicity of this virus with important implications for diagnosis of this virus.

https://www.biorxiv .org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v1
Your link didn't work. Here's another link that adds more enquires into the lab origins.

See also..
 
Last edited:

anti-barabas-ite

Work stuff through in your brain...UNVAXXED
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
Escaped True Master
The three Yan reports used scientific evidence and analyses to prove that SARS-CoV-2 is an Unrestricted Bioweaponcreated by military scientists of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) regime. These reports have played a pivotal role in revealing the true identity of the ongoing Unrestricted Biowarfare. For this reason, the CCP and its allies have been constantly launching attacks at the Yan Reports
 

MeanMaster

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
The three Yan reports used scientific evidence and analyses to prove that SARS-CoV-2 is an Unrestricted Bioweaponcreated by military scientists of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) regime. These reports have played a pivotal role in revealing the true identity of the ongoing Unrestricted Biowarfare. For this reason, the CCP and its allies have been constantly launching attacks at the Yan Reports
Yep. https://gameruprising.to/index.php?...c-route-for-the-creation-of-sars-cov-2.26283/
 

anti-barabas-ite

Work stuff through in your brain...UNVAXXED
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
Escaped True Master
Here comes jew liar machine to re re re ramp up the bat Corona theory of infectious flu!!!

Does gates pay for this?


Bloomberg: Where Did Covid Come From? Infected Wuhan Wild Animal Report Sheds New Light.
 

anti-barabas-ite

Work stuff through in your brain...UNVAXXED
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
Escaped True Master

MeanMaster

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
KPTV: Brown announces COVID-19 vaccine mandate for Oregon K-12 teachers, staff.


THE SCIENCE IS CLEAR except it isnt and never can be these niggers just keep saying hoping its true.

Cant have an UNVAXXED control group to help prove it.

Everyday I get taken over by evil and hope these people die from ADE or spike protien overdose!
I would love to see the look in their eyes when they finally realize they were wrong all alone.

I'm not counting on it, but it would be nice.

I'm kinda concerned they have some kind of heads they win - tails we lose situation planned.

Well, anyway. It's good to know that Afghan style still works.
 
Last edited:

anti-barabas-ite

Work stuff through in your brain...UNVAXXED
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
Escaped True Master
You aren't legally allowed to know which variant gave you COVID-19 in the US, even if it's Delta

Sam Reider, a musician from San Francisco, got a call from the California Department of Public Health in June. Though fully vaccinated, Reider had recently tested positive for COVID-19 after teaching music at a summer camp. The health department asked him to take a second test at a local Kaiser Permanente.

Reider assumed it was because authorities wanted to find out whether he had a Delta infection. He, too, was curious — but when he got the test results back, he was surprised to learn that doctors couldn't give him any information about his variant.

"When I got the follow-up from Kaiser, they said it's positive, but they didn't have any of the sequencing information," Reider told Insider. That "felt odd to me," he said.

Several legal barriers prevented Reider and his doctors — as well as nearly all Americans who have tested positive for the coronavirus — from knowing which variant was to blame.


The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service (CMS), which oversees the regulatory process for US labs, requires genome-sequencing tests to be federally approved before their results can be disclosed to doctors or patients. These are the tests that pick up on variants, but right now, there's little incentive for the labs to do the work to validate those tests.

"I don't think there's a lot of motivation, quite honestly, to get that done," Kelly Wroblewki, director of infectious diseases at the Association of Public Health Laboratories, told Insider.

Some patients, however, feel they're being denied access to their own health information.

In some cases, knowing which variant is involved in an infection could inform how patients do their own contact tracing, since it informs how likely they are to have spread the virus others. (If it's a Delta infection, for instance, they may want to notify a much wider circle of family and friends.)


Other patients, like Ryan Forrest, a 30-year-old in Midland Park, New Jersey, are simply curious to figure out how they were infected.

Forrest tested positive for COVID-19 after attending an indoor wedding in July. He said he didn't have any personal interactions with the wedding's "patient zero," so he's still wondering how he got sick — especially since he was vaccinated in March. Knowing that the Delta variant infected him could clear up confusion, he said.

"It would have been nice to know just for curiosity more than anything else," he said.

Wroblewki said she "totally understands" that feeling.


"I would be curious. I think anybody would be curious," she said. "The important thing to recognize is it's a liability for laboratories to release the information."

It's arduous and time-consuming to validate a sequencing test
variant lab
Researchers sequence coronavirus samples at the microbiology laboratory of the University Hospital of Badajoz in Spain on April 15, 2021. Javier Pulpo/Europa Press/Getty Images
So far, Wroblewki said, more than 50 public labs in the US are capable of sequencing coronavirus samples to detect variants. But she's not aware of any labs that have completed the validation process to get federal approval.

"The process of validating a next-generation sequencing test is burdensome," Wroblewki said. "It takes a lot of time. It takes a lot of data. It takes a lot of resources. And the thing about the variants is that variants of concern and of interest are constantly changing, so you would have to do a whole validation every time you have a variant."

For a sequencing test to be validated, a manufacturer needs to collect data to show that the test does a good job of detecting a specific variant, then request emergency authorization from the Food and Drug Administration. Alternatively, laboratories can validate their sequencing tests "in house," meaning they collect the same data so CMS can approve their test.


"The letter of the law from CMS is that if you don't go through this full validation process, you cannot release the results with patient identifying information," Wroblewki said. One major exception, she noted, is if epidemiologists need to disclose a person's variant information over the course of contact tracing.

Validating a test for a single variant could take weeks to months, she added.

"To keep up with it in real time, when it doesn't influence a decision you're going to make on how you treat a patient, just isn't very useful," Wroblewki said. "It's satisfying curiosity more than it's really benefiting a patient."

A more concerning variant could push scientists to disclose information to patients
COVID testing
Physicians assistant Tom Bui administers a COVID-19 test at Temple Dieu Ngu in Westminster, California, on October 16, 2020. Photo by Jeff Gritchen/MediaNews Group/Orange County Register via Getty Images
The main purpose of sequencing, Wroblewki said, is to detect new variants and understand whether they challenge the effectiveness of vaccines, treatments, or diagnostic tests. Down the line, she said, labs also hope to get better at understanding whether certain variants cause more severe outcomes in certain populations, such as pregnant women or the elderly.


But right now, variants haven't fundamentally changed the way people protect themselves from COVID-19. Though the Delta variant is the most contagious version of the virus yet, masks and social distancing still reduce its spread. And COVID-19 vaccines continue to offer good protection against severe disease and death.

"At this point, unless we see something that truly is going to direct your therapeutic choice at an individual patient level, there's not a lot of benefit to a physician or a patient in knowing you have Delta," Wroblewki said. "There's nothing differently that a physician is going to do to treat that patient."

That makes it hard to justify the time and expense of a validating a test, she added — particularly when those resources could be used to do more sequencing.

"If we see later there's going to be true impact on a therapeutic that's used to treat SARS-CoV-2, then yes, we'll very likely change our approach," Wroblewki said. "But at this moment, we're not there yet."


My take; if anybody could sequence it it would be indistinguishable from a Flu.

If it was a variant and real

HOAX
 

anti-barabas-ite

Work stuff through in your brain...UNVAXXED
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
Escaped True Master

No new virus, spike protiensare the weapon?

Mike Adam's with the german investigative team!
 

anti-barabas-ite

Work stuff through in your brain...UNVAXXED
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
Escaped True Master
A high-profile Eastern European pathologist (M.D.) named Stoian Alexov serves on the Board of the European Society of Pathology.[2]




He and I have been frequently exchanging information on the so-called “pandemic” since mid-2020. He has confirmed to me in writing that he and his colleagues across the European continent as well as worldwide, while conducting autopsies, have not found evidence of any deaths from SARS-CoV-2.[2]

More specifically:



i.
Pathologists conducting autopsies have found no antibodies specific to SARS-CoV-2. Logically then, its not been possible to confirm that the virus was ever present in the bodies of the deceased. 





ii. Autopsies have also consistently failed to afford any actual evidence that the “virus” is deadly, so the not unreasonable conclusion is that no-one has actually died because of the virus. 





iii. There is no verifiable scientific proof that the RNA sequences of SARS-CoV-2 is the causative agent of varied sicknesses and deaths occurring, and there has also been a consistent lack of clear evidence that the so-called CoV - 19 “pandemic” actually exists. 





In case any of you missed seeing it, there is a well thought out paper published online in January of this year entitled: Phantom Virus:
 In Search of Sars-Cov-2.[3] https://off-guardian.org/2021/01/31/phantom-virus-in-search-of-sars-cov-2/

For a fascinating read which challenges the view that variously labeled viruses are specific disease causative agents, go to the article by Dr. Robert Young entitled: "Dismantling the Viral Theory: Has the Existence of Polio, Measles, HIV, CMV, EBV, Hep C, Ebola, The Flu, Zika"and Now Corona Viruses Have NOT Been Demonstrated and Scientifically Proven?"[4]




 

anti-barabas-ite

Work stuff through in your brain...UNVAXXED
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
Escaped True Master

Is Disease an Esoteric Mystery?




Disease is not an esoteric mystery that only a white-robed and licensed medical priesthood can understand and treat. It has been aptly observed: “We do not catch diseases. We build them…. We work hard at developing our diseases. We must work just as hard at restoring health… The road to understanding the process of maintaining and restoring health has been a long and twisted one. From ancient and intuitive knowledge, science has taken over, made colossal errors, and clings to them for dear life”.[6][7][8][9][10]




The concept of specific, unchanging types of bacteria (and later viruses) causing specific diseases became officially accepted as the foundation of microbiology and in turn allopathic Western medicine in he late 19th century. This overly simplistic view has proven to be so incredibly profitable that all other views on infectious disease causation, including the pleomorphic (aka polymorphic) nature of microbes, with such transitions being determined by nutritional status, etc., are generally dismissed as contrived or irrelevant. This is the case despite the reality that the process of pleomorphic transition is at times observable with standard light-transmitting microscopes. To see an actual pleomorphic transition under a pHase contrast light microscope documented in a 19 year old Type I diabetic woman by Dr. Robert O. Young (when viewing use a browser showing the unmute option),[11]

 
Top