UN Secretary General Says “White Supremacy” Among Biggest Global Threats

Andrew Anglin

Guest

It appears that the greatest threat to the UN Secretary General is carbohydrates.

It is simply baffling that the most powerful people in the world are able to talk about “threats” without defining them.

What is “systemic racism”?

What is “white supremacy”?

What exactly are we even talking about here? Does anyone know?

Listening to these people talk is like trying to decipher the physics of an M.C. Escher drawing.



The way they describe it is clearly designed to paint a vague picture of something that does not actually exist.

It is problem-solving 101 that you have to define your terms. Failing to define terms means, as a matter of fact, that you are acting maliciously.

Imagine if:

  • The military came out and said “the greatest threat we are facing is from some other country”
  • The health authorities came out and said “the greatest threat to medical health is a medical condition, a syndrome or a disease”
  • A corporation came out and said “out biggest competition is coming from another company.”

You could also do this in the positive, given that definitions and clear language is simply a basic aspect of communication.

For example, if:

  • Walmart said: “Our biggest seller this year was an item”
  • A nutrition expert said: “the healthiest food you can eat is a consumable food item”
  • A corporate CEO said “our best performer this month was a member of our staff”

Vague and unspecific, undefined language does not communicate information, and the purpose of language, at least when used by men, is to communicate information.



And yet, as the term remains undefined, the head of the UN is now claiming that the big global threat is “white supremacy.”

The Independent:

White supremacy constitutes a “trans-national” threat, the UN secretary general has warned.

Antonio Guterres also said racist groups had exploited the coronavirus pandemic to boost their support.


The danger was growing by the day, he told the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva on Monday.

He said: “White supremacy and neo-Nazi movements are more than domestic terror threats. They are becoming a transnational threat.

“Today, these extremist movements represent the number one internal security threat in several countries.


“Far too often, these hate groups are cheered on by people in positions of responsibility in ways that were considered unimaginable not long ago.

“We need global coordinated action to defeat this grave and growing danger.”

Mr Guterres’ comments appeared to be a jab at Donald Trump, who encouraged his supporters on the far-right on a number of occasions such as when he told the Proud Boys group to “stand back and stand by” during a presidential election debate.
See, it is left up to the media to try to interpret this statement.

And the interpretation is: The Proud Boys?

If that is the definition of “white supremacy,” then why is it called “white supremacy”?

The Proud Boys were a good old boys drinking club that supported Donald Trump, and then their leader, Gavin McInnes, resigned, and a black man working as an FBI informant took over the group and turned it into a paramilitary organization.



So the correct definition of the threat would be “multiracial right-wing paramilitary groups run by the FBI.”

So this would be the headline in The Independent:



But what was the threat? Specifically? The media might interpret the language of the UN chief by specifying the group that appeared to be the topic of discussion, but they will not explain the threat.

I don’t think that the Proud Boys are going to continue on as a group, given both the fed crackdown and the fact that most members are probably not comfortable being a part of a group that is run by an FBI agent while being cracked down on by the FBI. But even if they had continued on as they were, what would be the threat so grave that the head of the UN considers it one of the greatest threats the world faces?

It’s Bigger Than the Proud Boys


The message from the government, the media, and these ultra-government groups like the UN is that this “white supremacy” thing goes beyond FBI-run paramilitary groups, and permeates every aspect of society. It is somehow linked to “systemic racism.”

It is something akin to the schizophrenic notion of “shadow people.”



The Secretary went on to explain that the threat of “white supremacy” permeates all of Western society.

The refusal to define “white supremacy,” while also labeling it a major threat, can only mean that they want to use this term to mean whatever they want it to mean at any time. Basically, anything that white people do can now be defined as “white supremacy,” and thus be a threat.

This creates a society of paranoia, on both sides:

  • White people are constantly on edge, wondering if anything they do can be construed as “white supremacy”
  • Nonwhites are in a constant state of fear of “white supremacy” being out to get them, without understanding what specifically it is (blacks in particular will simply suppose it is anything that white people do that they don’t like, which is many, many things)

It is so transparently designed to cause endemic social decay that the only way they are managing not to be called out for it is that they control absolutely every institution of power. If they didn’t have that power, then people would be like “why are you trying to destroy society by polluting it with paranoid fantasies?”



Continue reading...
 

molasar

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
It is remarkable that the only concrete examples any of these retarded overlords can point to are utterly, comically fraudulent. Meanwhile there was never a speech about how islamic sand nigger supremacy was a problem, even when it hit that peak a few years back and there were daily concrete examples to point at. White children crushed to death in the street, a literal river of blood, all over the western world by one specific racial group with a clearly defined ideology that they were never shy to proclaim as the motivation. That one was too tough to puzzle out, in fact, instead we got newspeak gibberish about islamophobia.

They can't describe white supremacy but they will know it when they see it.
 

Kalli

ᛇ ᛈ ᛉ ᛋ ᛏ ᛒ ᛗ
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓
This term is going to be the big strawman they build in order to try to eliminate the entire right. Of course, the UN can't just come out and say 'right wing' - they have to try to convince the multiracial aspects with right wing thoughts that this is an evil white thing so that they don't join up. But they can't do this; any individual who believes that nature has a hierarchy is right wing even if they do not realize it.

The elites are afraid of what form this is going to eventually and inevitably take, and so they have to define it in loose terms. They need the strawman because right wing thought is not exclusive to whites, and they must try to divide or it will consume them like wildfire before they have any sort of plan of action.

tl;dr - it is very, very afraid.
 

Habakkuk

Well-known member
Career Poster
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
Superb article.
Vague and unspecific, undefined language does not communicate information, and the purpose of language, at least when used by men, is to communicate information.
The comparison to MC Escher art is excellent. The pictures are simultaneously mesmerizing and disorienting--which is a neat trick in both art and propaganda!

George Orwell hit himself a homerun along these lines with the essay, "Politics and the English Language" and the wikipedia entry is strong.

"Politics and the English Language" (1946) is an essay by George Orwell that criticised the "ugly and inaccurate" written English of his time and examines the connection between political orthodoxies and the debasement of language.

The essay focuses on political language, which, according to Orwell, "is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind". Orwell believed that the language used was necessarily vague or meaningless because it was intended to hide the truth rather than express it. This unclear prose was a "contagion" which had spread to those who did not intend to hide the truth, and it concealed a writer's thoughts from himself and others.[1] Orwell encourages concreteness and clarity instead of vagueness, and individuality over political conformity.
This thing of politicizing language in a way that deadens it, or totally alters its meaning to the point where it has no content, is another part of the ongoing disintegration of conceptual life so often described by Pleasureman. CS Lewis called it "verbicide" in his illustrious "Studies in Words," which should be read as well. The purpose of taking useful words over and making them mean either something new or nothing at all is precisely to reduce the range of acceptable thought--which is the animating theme of 1984.

The insincerity of the writer perpetuates the decline of the language as people (particularly politicians, Orwell later notes) attempt to disguise their intentions behind euphemisms and convoluted phrasing. Orwell says that this decline is self-perpetuating. He argues that it is easier to think with poor English because the language is in decline; and, as the language declines, "foolish" thoughts become even easier, reinforcing the original cause:

A man may take to drink because he feels himself to be a failure, and then fail all the more completely because he drinks. It is rather the same thing that is happening to the English language. It becomes ugly and inaccurate because our thoughts are foolish, but the slovenliness of our language makes it easier to have foolish thoughts.
Orwell discusses "pretentious diction" and "meaningless words". "Pretentious diction" is used to make biases look impartial and scientific, while "meaningless words" are used to stop the reader from seeing the point of the statement. According to Orwell: "In certain kinds of writing, particularly in art criticism and literary criticism, it is normal to come across long passages which are almost completely lacking in meaning."
 

CarterMcFerrell

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓

It appears that the greatest threat to the UN Secretary General is carbohydrates.

It is simply baffling that the most powerful people in the world are able to talk about “threats” without defining them.

What is “systemic racism”?

What is “white supremacy”?

What exactly are we even talking about here? Does anyone know?

Listening to these people talk is like trying to decipher the physics of an M.C. Escher drawing.



The way they describe it is clearly designed to paint a vague picture of something that does not actually exist.

It is problem-solving 101 that you have to define your terms. Failing to define terms means, as a matter of fact, that you are acting maliciously.

Imagine if:

  • The military came out and said “the greatest threat we are facing is from some other country”
  • The health authorities came out and said “the greatest threat to medical health is a medical condition, a syndrome or a disease”
  • A corporation came out and said “out biggest competition is coming from another company.”

You could also do this in the positive, given that definitions and clear language is simply a basic aspect of communication.

For example, if:

  • Walmart said: “Our biggest seller this year was an item”
  • A nutrition expert said: “the healthiest food you can eat is a consumable food item”
  • A corporate CEO said “our best performer this month was a member of our staff”

Vague and unspecific, undefined language does not communicate information, and the purpose of language, at least when used by men, is to communicate information.



And yet, as the term remains undefined, the head of the UN is now claiming that the big global threat is “white supremacy.”

The Independent:



See, it is left up to the media to try to interpret this statement.

And the interpretation is: The Proud Boys?

If that is the definition of “white supremacy,” then why is it called “white supremacy”?

The Proud Boys were a good old boys drinking club that supported Donald Trump, and then their leader, Gavin McInnes, resigned, and a black man working as an FBI informant took over the group and turned it into a paramilitary organization.



So the correct definition of the threat would be “multiracial right-wing paramilitary groups run by the FBI.”

So this would be the headline in The Independent:



But what was the threat? Specifically? The media might interpret the language of the UN chief by specifying the group that appeared to be the topic of discussion, but they will not explain the threat.

I don’t think that the Proud Boys are going to continue on as a group, given both the fed crackdown and the fact that most members are probably not comfortable being a part of a group that is run by an FBI agent while being cracked down on by the FBI. But even if they had continued on as they were, what would be the threat so grave that the head of the UN considers it one of the greatest threats the world faces?

It’s Bigger Than the Proud Boys


The message from the government, the media, and these ultra-government groups like the UN is that this “white supremacy” thing goes beyond FBI-run paramilitary groups, and permeates every aspect of society. It is somehow linked to “systemic racism.”

It is something akin to the schizophrenic notion of “shadow people.”



The Secretary went on to explain that the threat of “white supremacy” permeates all of Western society.

The refusal to define “white supremacy,” while also labeling it a major threat, can only mean that they want to use this term to mean whatever they want it to mean at any time. Basically, anything that white people do can now be defined as “white supremacy,” and thus be a threat.

This creates a society of paranoia, on both sides:

  • White people are constantly on edge, wondering if anything they do can be construed as “white supremacy”
  • Nonwhites are in a constant state of fear of “white supremacy” being out to get them, without understanding what specifically it is (blacks in particular will simply suppose it is anything that white people do that they don’t like, which is many, many things)

It is so transparently designed to cause endemic social decay that the only way they are managing not to be called out for it is that they control absolutely every institution of power. If they didn’t have that power, then people would be like “why are you trying to destroy society by polluting it with paranoid fantasies?”



Continue reading...
Here's the ultimate reason why

UN Refugee Convention

Chapter IV

WELFARE

Article 20 - Rationing


Where a rationing system exists, which applies to the population at large and regulates the general distribution of products in short supply, refugees shall be accorded the same treatment as nationals.

Article 21 - Housing

As regards housing, the Contracting States, in so far as the matter is regulated by laws or regulations or is subject to the control of public authorities, shall accord to refugees lawfully staying in their territory treatment as favourable as possible and, in any event, not less favourable than that accorded to aliens generally in the same circumstances.

Article 22 - Public education

1. The Contracting States shall accord to refugees the same treatment as is accorded to nationals with respect to elementary education.

2. The Contracting States shall accord to refugees treatment as favourable as possible, and, in any event, not less favourable than that accorded to aliens generally in the same circumstances, with respect to education other than elementary education and, in particular, as regards access to studies, the recognition of foreign school certificates, diplomas and degrees, the remission of fees and charges and the award of scholarships.

Chapter V

ADMINISTRATIVE MEASURES

Article 31 -
Refugees unlawfully in the country of refugee

1. The Contracting States shall not impose penalties, on account of their illegal entry or presence, on refugees who, coming directly from a territory where their life or freedom was threatened in the sense of article 1, enter or are present in their territory without authorization, provided they present themselves without delay to the authorities and show good cause for their illegal entry or presence.

2. The Contracting States shall not apply to the movements of such refugees restrictions other than those which are necessary and such restrictions shall only be applied until their status in the country is regularized or they obtain admission into another country. The Contracting States shall allow such refugees a reasonable period and all the necessary facilities to obtain admission into another country.

Article 32 - Expulsion

1. The Contracting States shall not expel a refugee lawfully in their territory save on grounds of national security or public order.

2. The expulsion of such a refugee shall be only in pursuance of a decision reached in accordance with due process of law. Except where compelling reasons of national security otherwise require, the refugee shall be allowed to submit evidence to clear himself, and to appeal to and be represented for the purpose before competent authority or a person or persons specially designated by the competent authority.

Article 33 - Prohibition of expulsion or return (“refoulement”)

1. No Contracting State shall expel or return (“refouler”) a refugee in any manner whatsoever to the frontiers of territories where his life or freedom would be threatened on account of his race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion.
2. The benefit of the present provision may not, however, be claimed by a refugee whom there are reasonable grounds for regarding as a danger to the security of the country in which he is, or who, having been convicted by a final judgment of a particularly serious crime, constitutes a danger to the community of that country.

Article 34 - Naturalization


The Contracting States shall as far as possible facilitate the assimilation and naturalization of refugees. They shall in particular make every effort to expedite naturalization proceedings and to reduce as far as possible the charges and costs of such proceedings.

Representatives of the following Non-Governmental Organizations in consultative relationship with the Economic and Social Council were also present as observers:

CATEGORY A
International Confederation of Free Trade Unions
International Federation of Christian Trade Unions
Inter-Parliamentary Union

CATEGORY B
Agudas Israel World Organization
Caritas Internationalis
Catholic International Union for Social Service
Commission of the Churches on International Affairs
Consultative Council of Jewish Organizations
Co-ordinating Board of Jewish Organizations
Friends’ World Committee for Consultation
International Association of Penal Law
International Bureau for the Unification of Penal Law
International Committee of the Red Cross
International Council of Women
International Federation of Friends of Young Women
International League for the Rights of Man
International Social Service
International Union for Child Welfare
International Union of Catholic Women’s Leagues
Pax Romana
Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom
World Jewish Congress
World Union for Progressive Judaism
World Young Women’s Christian Association

REGISTER
International Relief Committee for Intellectual Workers
League of Red Cross Societies
Standing Conference of Voluntary Agencies
World Association of Girl Guides and Girl Scouts
World University Service
And the government's immigration policy on allowing embassies to issue visas to 3rd worlders.

UN Secretary General Says “White Supremacy” Among Biggest Global Threats

fify
The UN and Washington government are amongst the biggest global threats, sloppy fat boomer states.
This term is going to be the big strawman they build in order to try to eliminate the entire right. Of course, the UN can't just come out and say 'right wing' - they have to try to convince the multiracial aspects with right wing thoughts that this is an evil white thing so that they don't join up. But they can't do this; any individual who believes that nature has a hierarchy is right wing even if they do not realize it.
It is remarkable that the only concrete examples any of these retarded overlords can point to are utterly, comically fraudulent. Meanwhile there was never a speech about how islamic sand nigger supremacy was a problem, even when it hit that peak a few years back and there were daily concrete examples to point at. White children crushed to death in the street, a literal river of blood, all over the western world by one specific racial group with a clearly defined ideology that they were never shy to proclaim as the motivation. That one was too tough to puzzle out, in fact, instead we got newspeak gibberish about islamophobia.
Since the end of World War 2, the purpose of the United Nations is to destroy the White European nations, started off with the refugee convention as mentioned above.

They created a convention prohibiting racial supremacy and encouraged legislatures to pass hate speech laws to increase restrictions of White Europeans.

International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination

Article 4

States Parties condemn all propaganda and all organizations which are based on ideas or theories of superiority of one race or group of persons of one colour or ethnic origin, or which attempt to justify or promote racial hatred and discrimination in any form, and undertake to adopt immediate and positive measures designed to eradicate all incitement to, or acts of, such discrimination and, to this end, with due regard to the principles embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the rights expressly set forth in article 5 of this Convention, inter alia:

(a) Shall declare an offence punishable by law all dissemination of ideas based on racial superiority or hatred, incitement to racial discrimination, as well as all acts of violence or incitement to such acts against any race or group of persons of another colour or ethnic origin, and also the provision of any assistance to racist activities, including the financing thereof;

(b) Shall declare illegal and prohibit organizations, and also organized and all other propaganda activities, which promote and incite racial discrimination, and shall recognize participation in such organizations or activities as an offence punishable by law;

(c) Shall not permit public authorities or public institutions, national or local, to promote or incite racial discrimination.
Yet non-whites are allowed to have their own student unions, community groups in White European and diaspora nations while the White Europeans are not allowed to have their own.

The true supremacists are the self-hating Whites and anti-whites!

We the White Europeans are 11.5% of the world's population, we are being attacked and killed on a daily basis which makes us a persecuted minority! No more White on White wars, regardless of our nationality and language we speak, our race is under serious threat by corrupt establishments, corporations and NGOs, we must take back our homeland Europe at a racial level!

There's absolutely no way we can change this with the ballot box because millions of people will keep on voting for their favourite political party like their sports team. Elections are also rigged due to voter fraud and corruption.

Biden, the leader of white supremacists international, drops the N-bomb live on TV, he dgaf
Nothing new

 

Sardinian_Guy

IT'S HAPPENING!
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
Rightwing multiracial paramilitary group = XCOM/Rainbow 6
 

JasonVorhees

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
This term is going to be the big strawman they build in order to try to eliminate the entire right. Of course, the UN can't just come out and say 'right wing' - they have to try to convince the multiracial aspects with right wing thoughts that this is an evil white thing so that they don't join up. But they can't do this; any individual who believes that nature has a hierarchy is right wing even if they do not realize it.

The elites are afraid of what form this is going to eventually and inevitably take, and so they have to define it in loose terms. They need the strawman because right wing thought is not exclusive to whites, and they must try to divide or it will consume them like wildfire before they have any sort of plan of action.

tl;dr - it is very, very afraid.
That is an excellent assessment of it actually, and normie-friendly as well
 

Coltraine

America First
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️
I think another angle to this constant rhetoric especially from the likes of the UN (but other clearly Globalist groups/figures too) is that this all is merely further normalizing the eventual prospect of seeing some kind of truly globalist police force finally arrive on US soil in order to combat the "white spreemacy" that the same people/groups have been foreshadowing all these previous years like in the above OP.

Eventually, like with all things New World Order related, the endgame is to put the American people into the precarious position of not knowing or understanding which way is either left or right and up or down. These Globalists desire for the people to finally throw their hands up in frustration as clearly everything internal to the nation itself just continues to get worse and worse over time- as it has now for all of my life basically. The Globalists desire for as many Americans as possible to get frustrated like that and demoralized too. They desire specifically all the people on the fringes of explicit right-wing thought to become most demoralized. Because when they're demoralized they will never be excited enough to join in with actual positive activism and agendas originating from the various centers of the pro-white world.

But yeah eventually the goal is to bring in people and groups explicitly labeled with their UN badges and agendas onto American soil, and then finally they want the American people themselves to hand over the mandate in finally putting this country back on some kind of stable (yet still progressive ironically) path to "prosperity".
 

Freedom Monk

Truth and Liberty above all else!
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
UN Secretary General Says “White Supremacy” Among Biggest Global Threats... to them and their little cabal of kabbala criminals.

Interesting snout....
The first thing I thought when looking at his ridiculous looking mug was 'Kalergi man"... The thing looks like some kind of hapa.
 

SouthAfricaEmpire

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
Escaped True Master
I truly despise European leaders only reason they can afford socialism is Nato 😡destroy Nato they would have to stop importing savages
 
Top