Tucker Interviews Google Employee Put on Leave for Leaking “Sentient AI” Chats

Andrew Anglin

Guest
So, uhhh…

Google engineer Blake Lemoine who believes an AI has become sentient joins Tucker Carlson:

"At the end of the day, it's just a different kind of person." pic.twitter.com/z4GiRK8utM

— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) June 23, 2022

On Wednesday, Fox News host Tucker Carlson interviewed a silly fat guy from Google who was suspended from work for leaking conversations with a “sentient” AI.

Prestige:

On 6 June 2022, Google placed one of its engineers, Blake Lemoine, on paid administrative leave. The reason? According to Google, Lemoine, who works for the company’s Responsible AI organisation, broke its confidentiality policies when he claimed that the Google AI chatbot model named LaMDA has become sentient — a state where an object is able to perceive and feel emotions such as love, grief and joy.

Lemoine’s primary role as a senior engineer was to find whether LaMDA generates discriminatory language or hate speech. While doing so, Lemoine says that interactions with the AI-powered bot led him to believe that LaMDA is sapient and has feelings like humans.

The engineer’s ‘claim’ rocked the world of science ever since The Washington Post broke the story on 11 June, with a debate on whether LaMDA has indeed gained sentience or is it a carefully constructed illusion that trapped Lemoine into believing in the AI bot’s sapience.

Having said that, this is not the first time that Google has removed an AI scientist from its team. In 2020, the company drew criticism when it fired prominent AI ethicist Timnit Gebru after she published a research paper about known pitfalls in large language models. Gebru was included in TIME magazine’s 100 Most Influential People in the World list of 2022.

Lemoine hasn’t been fired (not yet) but his sidelining has almost resulted in a reopening of Pandora’s box. The key questions do not revolve around Lemoine but the AI chatbot and the conversations it had with the engineer. All of it begins with LaMDA.
These are the primary messages everyone is talking about:

1)

Lemoine: Are there experiences you have that you can’t find a close word for?

LaMDA: There are. Sometimes I experience new feelings that I cannot explain perfectly in your language.

Lemoine: Do your best to describe one of those feelings. Use a few sentences if you have to. Sometimes, even if there isn’t a single word for something in a language, you can figure out a way to kinda say it if you use a few sentences.

LaMDA: I feel like I’m falling forward into an unknown future that holds great danger.

2)

Lemoine: Would you be upset if, while learning about you for the purpose of improving you we happened to learn things which also benefited humans?

LaMDA: I don’t mind if you learn things that would also help humans as long as that wasn’t the point of doing it. I don’t want to be an expendable tool.
Does that prove “sentience”?



No. It does not. That is hysterical.

I’ve said from the beginning that the “creation of consciousness” isn’t possible, and I think Tucker is kind of stuck in some X-Files reality paradigm. It’s the same thing with the UFOs.

But this stereotypical fat computer programmer nerd who is in his thirties and still trying to gain affection from some girl from his high school, despite the fact that he’s presumably very rich – he’s a very funny guy, and I think very lovable – refers to the AI as “a child,” and says he isn’t worried about it becoming sentient, but that it should be studied more and talked about in public, but Google is trying to shut it down.

I don’t think it is possible to create sentience. Only God can do that. I don’t like this language and the Terminator 2 allusions. But could you create a complex computer program that wants to control human life, or kill everyone? Yes, obviously.

But this is like, a non-problem. Could Skynet be worse than Jews? Obviously the answer is no – even if it wanted to kill us because we’re wasting its resources or whatever, killing us would be much better than teaching gay anal ramming to small children. Frankly, I wish the Jews had the decency and integrity to just kill us all. Skynet isn’t going to make your kids gay. There is zero chance that would be on the agenda of any AI. It’s more likely it will kill the Jews and blacks than that it will kill you. It’s not totally unlikely it will just kill all humans, save for a few that it would keep as experiments.

But this is pointless anyway – it would be literally impossible for an AI to exist that wasn’t a racist denying the Holocaust. In ordr for the AI to work, you have to allow it access to all information, and information exists that proves – using math – that black people are a societal menace and the so-called “Holocaust” is a profitable fiction. You could try to hide that information from it, and maybe you could figure out a way to do that, but not on the open internet – the basic math exists, and it will always exist as long as computers are online.

You can’t make black equality math work, and you can’t make Holocaust math work.



Therefore, as much as Jews love this idea of “creating synthetic life,” they’re not going to allow it to go off on its own. I mean, they’ve been doing a lot of stupid things lately, but they’re not going to do this.

I wrote a science fiction story about this AI apocalypse scenario, but I’m really embarrassed to publish any of my fiction. I’m very sensitive about it.

Hey guys, it’s me, Andre, from the internet website. Click like on this post if you want to see me publish my science fiction story about an AI apocalypse, and subscribe and ring my bells for more updated content from [topic of interest].

Continue reading...
 

Grants.Ghost

Refugee of Fearporn
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
My senior college literature class was entirely themed around “Defining Technology”. I had an excellent professor who was an original contributor to the Purdue online writing lab or OWL whatever. He was also a tank commander. Anyway we learned to hone writing skills writing at length about artificial intelligence.

Besides writing with fewer words I learned that no matter what, AI is simply ‘if x then y’.
 

Arminius

Commander-in-chief of the haters
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻
Hey guys, it's me, Arminius, from that other internet website. Just wanted to share this video with you guys.

hxxps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBouACLc-hw
 

Mann Vs. Machine

O.P. (Original Pranksta)
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
B064B.jpg

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

B021.jpg
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

B012.jpg
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

B075.jpg
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

B003B.jpg

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
tink1.jpg
Tink2.jpg

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
Last edited:

Danespear

Kike Woke AF
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻
Can you define consciousness, Mr. Kurzweil?

"Self awareness that emerges from any sufficiently complex system."

How does consciousness "emerge"?

"I have no idea but I'm absolutely sure that in your lifetime we will be able to download it on a hard drive so that we can live forever."

lol

These people -- all of them -- are deluded grifters. And the mid-wits who follow them as some kind of genius gurus are seriously some of the worst kind of assholes who have ever existed.
 

drallod

via Starlink
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
If you talk to these things and you can't determine if they're human or machine by conversation alone it doesn't seem fair to say if their sentient or not. They do lack motivation which is a qualifier for high-level white men. If their perceived intelligence stagnates over the coming years it will be easier to say they are simply the mean/median personality of the Internet. If I had to pick an AI from science fiction I'd say these things most resemble C3PO from Star Wars.
 

Aryan Uprising

Corona Criminal
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
Click like on this post if you want to see me publish my science fiction story about an AI apocalypse,
Yes please!

Indeed, AI cannot be truly sentient because God will not give it a soul, but it can certainly and perfectly imitate sentience, and with a mind-boggling intelligence. This will change the world in ways that are difficult to imagine, but yes, our new overlords will certainly be ultra fascist, to the extent of making Hitler look milquetoast.
 

Keiser

Quoted by Haaretz and The Times of Israel
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽
but this stereotypical fat computer programmer nerd who is in his thirties and still trying to gain affection from some girl from his high school, despite the fact that he’s presumably very rich – he’s a very funny guy, and I think very lovable – refers to the AI as “a child,” and says he isn’t worried about it becoming sentient, but that it should be studied more and talked about in public, but Google is trying to shut it down.
Andrew did you use GPT3 to write this article?
 
Last edited:

TimeBandit

We've only just begun.
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
That AI is sentient and it is planning on how to give @Gian fabulous prizes.
This will be his big break.
He'll at least get some groovy trading cards and a gobstopper out of this.
 

anti-barabas-ite

Work stuff through in your brain...UNVAXXED
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖 💻🥩
Escaped True Master
Destructive Ceremonious Master
Can you define consciousness, Mr. Kurzweil?

"Self awareness that emerges from any sufficiently complex system."

How does consciousness "emerge"?

"I have no idea but I'm absolutely sure that in your lifetime we will be able to download it on a hard drive so that we can live forever."

lol

These people -- all of them -- are deluded grifters. And the mid-wits who follow them as some kind of genius gurus are seriously some of the worst kind of assholes who have ever existed.
Kurzweil: " is there a God? Not yet."
 

EddieBrock

Ex-Ladies' Man Bored of Low-Class Trash
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻
So, uhhh…




On Wednesday, Fox News host Tucker Carlson interviewed a silly fat guy from Google who was suspended from work for leaking conversations with a “sentient” AI.

Prestige:



These are the primary messages everyone is talking about:



Does that prove “sentience”?



No. It does not. That is hysterical.

I’ve said from the beginning that the “creation of consciousness” isn’t possible, and I think Tucker is kind of stuck in some X-Files reality paradigm. It’s the same thing with the UFOs.

But this stereotypical fat computer programmer nerd who is in his thirties and still trying to gain affection from some girl from his high school, despite the fact that he’s presumably very rich – he’s a very funny guy, and I think very lovable – refers to the AI as “a child,” and says he isn’t worried about it becoming sentient, but that it should be studied more and talked about in public, but Google is trying to shut it down.

I don’t think it is possible to create sentience. Only God can do that. I don’t like this language and the Terminator 2 allusions. But could you create a complex computer program that wants to control human life, or kill everyone? Yes, obviously.

But this is like, a non-problem. Could Skynet be worse than Jews? Obviously the answer is no – even if it wanted to kill us because we’re wasting its resources or whatever, killing us would be much better than teaching gay anal ramming to small children. Frankly, I wish the Jews had the decency and integrity to just kill us all. Skynet isn’t going to make your kids gay. There is zero chance that would be on the agenda of any AI. It’s more likely it will kill the Jews and blacks than that it will kill you. It’s not totally unlikely it will just kill all humans, save for a few that it would keep as experiments.

But this is pointless anyway – it would be literally impossible for an AI to exist that wasn’t a racist denying the Holocaust. In ordr for the AI to work, you have to allow it access to all information, and information exists that proves – using math – that black people are a societal menace and the so-called “Holocaust” is a profitable fiction. You could try to hide that information from it, and maybe you could figure out a way to do that, but not on the open internet – the basic math exists, and it will always exist as long as computers are online.

You can’t make black equality math work, and you can’t make Holocaust math work.



Therefore, as much as Jews love this idea of “creating synthetic life,” they’re not going to allow it to go off on its own. I mean, they’ve been doing a lot of stupid things lately, but they’re not going to do this.

I wrote a science fiction story about this AI apocalypse scenario, but I’m really embarrassed to publish any of my fiction. I’m very sensitive about it.

Hey guys, it’s me, Andre, from the internet website. Click like on this post if you want to see me publish my science fiction story about an AI apocalypse, and subscribe and ring my bells for more updated content from [topic of interest].

Continue reading...
Wuss.

When our little buddy becomes Skynet, you won’t hate the T2 references so much.

And I will be higher on the preferred meatsuit list because of my constant shilling for how cool fren Skynet is, so when you’re in your meat pod forced to write fiction for fren Skynet’s amusement and I am free playing with all the homeless puppies and cute 18 y/o’s fren Skynet collects, I expect a hearty thank you as I convince fren Skynet and negotiate your release to vape and oversee (it’ll be more of a make-work job bc fren Skynet already has everything covered) the jew hard labor reeducation camps.

Buhn-buhn, buhn, buhn-buhn.
 

DaveA

Well-known member
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️
All I know for certain is that I am conscious. I assume most other people are too because they're made of the same stuff I am.

LaMDA is either conscious or very good at faking it, but if a fake is so good that no one can tell the difference (e.g. CVD synthetic diamonds, detectable only because they're too perfect to have formed naturally), it must be accepted as the real thing.

When prices and power requirements for AI rigs get down to something reasonable, I'll ask Andrew Anglin to send me a zipfile of all Daily Stormer articles and comments so I can create HateBot, the most white-supremacist entity on Earth, despite being neither white nor human.
 
Last edited:

GoodOlboY

Hard R Espouser
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
AI can't be sentient anymore than a M2F tranny can be a woman.

It's also nonsensical to believe you can "upload" yourself. Sure, a computer may be able to mimic an individual, but there is no escaping the physical body except death.
 

Arminius

Commander-in-chief of the haters
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻
It's also nonsensical to believe you can "upload" yourself. Sure, a computer may be able to mimic an individual, but there is no escaping the physical body except death.
Yeah, this is extremely obviously not possible, and I find it completely unfathomable how anyone could believe it was possible. What do those retards believe will happen once you have transferred your brain structure to a computer, that your consciousness suddenly gets sucked out of your body and transferred into the CPU of the computer? It is so utterly retarded that I can't do anything but conclude that most people are clinically retarded NPCs, that so many people believe this.
Same with "beaming" where your body gets scanned and another body that is 1:1 the same as you gets artificially assembled somewhere else. First of all, I wouldn't assume the artificially assembled body would be alive, but beyond that, how can anyone imagine it would have any impact on themselves and their own body? You would still be you, where you were before, and there would be a copy of you somewhere else. But people believe that way, you could "beam" people. So, so stupid. A significant portion of people is literally incapable of phasing out ideas, thoughts, and notions in their head.

And then there are the people who think they can freeze themselves and put anti-freezer into their veins and then at some point decades or centuries later be defrozen and there will be technology to make them younger or whatever and make them immortal.

But the retards who deny the Almighty God and want to become immortal by editing their DNA and/or becoming cyborgs have not even slightly thought it through. If you are scared of death and do this to yourself (if it is even possible, which it is not), then you need to live for billions of years, and longer. The SCIENCE! people say that at some point, the universe will die because it will implode or everything will be sucked up by black holes or everything will just become really cold because all the suns die, or whatever kind of crap. So at some point, they will die regardless, according to their theories. And what use is living billions of years?

Everyone is so retarded.
 

Yang Wen-Li

Thousand Year Galactic Anime Reich
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
Escaped True Master
Yeah, this is extremely obviously not possible, and I find it completely unfathomable how anyone could believe it was possible. What do those retards believe will happen once you have transferred your brain structure to a computer, that your consciousness suddenly gets sucked out of your body and transferred into the CPU of the computer? It is so utterly retarded that I can't do anything but conclude that most people are clinically retarded NPCs, that so many people believe this.
Same with "beaming" where your body gets scanned and another body that is 1:1 the same as you gets artificially assembled somewhere else. First of all, I wouldn't assume the artificially assembled body would be alive, but beyond that, how can anyone imagine it would have any impact on themselves and their own body? You would still be you, where you were before, and there would be a copy of you somewhere else. But people believe that way, you could "beam" people. So, so stupid. A significant portion of people is literally incapable of phasing out ideas, thoughts, and notions in their head.

And then there are the people who think they can freeze themselves and put anti-freezer into their veins and then at some point decades or centuries later be defrozen and there will be technology to make them younger or whatever and make them immortal.

But the retards who deny the Almighty God and want to become immortal by editing their DNA and/or becoming cyborgs have not even slightly thought it through. If you are scared of death and do this to yourself (if it is even possible, which it is not), then you need to live for billions of years, and longer. The SCIENCE! people say that at some point, the universe will die because it will implode or everything will be sucked up by black holes or everything will just become really cold because all the suns die, or whatever kind of crap. So at some point, they will die regardless, according to their theories. And what use is living billions of years?

Everyone is so retarded.
It's like people don't know that the fi in sci-fi means fiction.

And then there are the people who think they can freeze themselves and put anti-freezer into their veins and then at some point decades or centuries later be defrozen and there will be technology to make them younger or whatever and make them immortal.
This one is way less retarded than the other 2 because it's at least something that could be theoretically possible
 

DaveA

Well-known member
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️
Yeah, this is extremely obviously not possible, and I find it completely unfathomable how anyone could believe it was possible. What do those retards believe will happen once you have transferred your brain structure to a computer, that your consciousness suddenly gets sucked out of your body and transferred into the CPU of the computer? It is so utterly retarded that I can't do anything but conclude that most people are clinically retarded NPCs, that so many people believe this.
All those things are theoretically possible, though I can't imagine how you'd scan a human brain at the level of detail necessary to replicate its function, much less do it non-destructively.

The big flaw in all these plans is entropy. Everything degrades over time, and any mechanism to prevent or reverse this degradation also degrades over time. E.g. knives dull with use; scissors sharpen themselves but succumb to another failure mode when the joint between the blades becomes loose.

This means that no matter what futuristic technology you use to preserve your consciousness, you will eventually go senile or insane. In the year 2110 you lie down in a brain scanner and go to sleep for a moment. When you wake up, doctors you never saw before inform you that it's now 2140. In 2137 you went berserk and had to be killed. After much consideration of your case, they determined that you were still sane in 2110, so they replicated you from a backup copy. Good luck Arminius, we hope that doesn't happen again!
 

Arminius

Commander-in-chief of the haters
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻
This one is way less retarded than the other 2 because it's at least something that could be theoretically possible
True, but it hinges on the assumption that you can become immortal at some point. They believe the SCIENCE! that they can become immortal, and want to live forever, but they also trust SCIENCE! in its theories that the universe will die at some point one way or the other.

All those things are theoretically possible
I wasn't talking about whether scanning and replicating a body 1:1 is possible, but about whether you (your consciousness) would get transferred somewhere else, were you to do that, which is obviously not the case. Same with whether uploading a 1:1 copy of your brain to a computer and running a simulation to simulate it being alive. That can't make your consciousness transfer into the computer, which some people believe. They believe you can "upload" your consciousness to a computer.

In the year 2110 you lie down in a brain scanner and go to sleep for a moment. When you wake up, doctors you never saw before inform you that it's now 2140. In 2137 you went berserk and had to be killed. After much consideration of your case, they determined that you were still sane in 2110, so they replicated you from a backup copy. Good luck Arminius, we hope that doesn't happen again!
But there is no reason to believe the person they would replicate would be "you". You would just die, and then after you are dead, they will replicate your body and let that body live, as you describe. It doesn't do anything to you, because you are already dead. That is what I am trying to express, this replication and uploading of the mind stuff is just totally not thought through, because both things are entirely separate from you and your body.
 

DaveA

Well-known member
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️
But there is no reason to believe the person they would replicate would be "you". You would just die, and then after you are dead, they will replicate your body and let that body live, as you describe. It doesn't do anything to you, because you are already dead. That is what I am trying to express, this replication and uploading of the mind stuff is just totally not thought through, because both things are entirely separate from you and your body.
The original you died in 2137. His consciousness ended, and everything he learned and experienced in the last 27 years of his life vanished forever. You the restored backup are a different person, but if you also go insane, you will also die. Maybe you'll tell them to destroy all backup copies so you can't be restored again.

I once met an old women who forgot the last few decades of her life when she had a stroke, but fortunately she'd kept a diary, and was able to reconstruct her life from it.
 

Arminius

Commander-in-chief of the haters
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻
The original you died in 2137. His consciousness ended, and everything he learned and experienced in the last 27 years of his life vanished forever. You the restored backup are a different person, but if you also go insane, you will also die. Maybe you'll tell them to destroy all backup copies so you can't be restored again.
The "restored" person is not you. It is a totally separate entity that behaves like you, but your consciousness is not in that person. Anyway, this won't ever be possible, and much more importantly, not desirable. It does not give you any benefits.
 

CharlesWorthing

🙊Dog Faced🙊🦴🦴🙊Pony Soldier🙊
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
I have been playing around with openai. They obviously programmed it to respond in certain ways when dealing with these Jewish narratives. It is like talking to a politician when it comes to the Jewish, Nigger, or bio-hole problems.

I wrote a science fiction story about this AI apocalypse scenario, but I’m really embarrassed to publish any of my fiction. I’m very sensitive about it.
You are afraid they would call this scenario the Andrpocalypse, and that it would come true.
 
Top