Thoughts on Polygyny

DaveA

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
(Please refrain from using the gender-neutral term "polygamy", because that includes polyandry, a perversion that has no place in any society.)

We have a problem. Our nations are crumbling, physically, mentally, and morally, because white men are not stepping up to the difficult and dangerous task of defending and repairing them. Why not?

Because Western Civilization has deteriorated to the point where white men cannot have obedient wives and children, and thus have no stake in the future. This cannot be solved by forcing men into marriage, because if you can be forced into anything, you are not a man. Men need incentives.

Healthy Christian societies say that if a man dedicates his life to pro-social activities, he may have *one* young virgin bride to love, cherish, and knock many babies out of.

That's a non-starter for us because we have very few young virgins to hand out. We do have a lot of aging sluts and cat-ladies though. A woman over thirty can't give you six healthy children, but a dozen of them probably could.

That's pretty much what the Mormons did. They traveled around the USA collecting ugly, lonely women and marrying them polygynously. Brigham Young himself had 56 children with 55 wives, which implies that most of his wives were charity cases who bore him no offspring.

As the Mormon founders died off and new generations came of age with a one-to-one sex ratio and early marriage, polygyny no longer served any purpose and was abolished. Polygyny is not a way of life -- it's a temporary measure to reboot society after a slutocalypse, or in Paraguay's case, after a war that killed most of the male population.
 
Last edited:

Mike Sinclair

Never forget Ashli Babbitt
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
It'll happen again. When society repents the single moms/catladies/etc. will seek the marital and spiritual cover of belonging to a man. After cataclysm there will likely be a highly skewed ration of men to women, unlike todays relative balance, because of all the men who will die.

Reference Isaiah 4:1: And in that day seven women shall take hold of one man, saying, β€œWe will eat our own bread and wear our own apparel; only let us be called by thy name to take away our reproach.”
 

Mike Sinclair

Never forget Ashli Babbitt
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
That's pretty much what the Mormons did. They traveled around the USA collecting ugly, lonely women and marrying them polygynously.
What's funny about that is modern day Mormon racial stock, largely descended from that original group, has lots of beautiful women in the fold. Noticeable more so than any other religious group I've noticed. Amish, for example, have lots of pig-faced women.
 

DaveA

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
What's funny about that is modern day Mormon racial stock, largely descended from that original group, has lots of beautiful women in the fold. Noticeable more so than any other religious group I've noticed. Amish, for example, have lots of pig-faced women.
Mark Twain visited in the 1860s and described the Mormon women as "poor, ungainly and pathetically homely creatures", but their faces have since had time to average out into something rather more pleasing.

The same thing happens when you combine ugly faces mathematically. The only common feature of ugly women is their fatness; all other defects average out.
 

CuzinEd

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»
Yeah and Mormons were basically chased out of the US and down into Mexico cause of their polygamy BS. The Muslims say you can have as many wives as you can afford. The key there being as you can afford. You can only afford one woman? Then that's all you can have.

When I see faggots whining about how white men won't stand up or some other nonsense all I see is a faggot whining cause no one will go out and cause any violence for him so he can sit at home and watch it safely on TV and jerk off to it. Want to "stand up"? Then go out and do it yourself. Otherwise STFU and stop whining.

White people don't have children cause they can't afford it. Want white people to have kids? Then do something to make the economy better. No, banning abortion won't make more white people. You will just get more niggers and human garbage.

Of course the days of whites having more than 2 maybe 3 children are over. That's never coming back.

If you can't afford to have children with 1 woman then you can't afford to have children with multiple women either. No one is going to have 6 kids. Kids are too expensive and you will never manage to put 6 women in one house. I don't care how ugly they are.

From what I can see with all the whiny loser faggots on here calling themselves incels and whining about how they can't get laid these fucks can't even manage to get one ugly woman to fuck them much less 6. LOL
 

DaveA

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
White people don't have children cause they can't afford it. Want white people to have kids? Then do something to make the economy better.
Ever hear the line, "Every kiss begins with Kay"? How much male income is wasted on useless baubles to keep the wifey happy? Marriage is far more expensive than it needs to be.

A total economic collapse would be better for the white birthrate, as hyperinflation reduces women's salaries in government, education, healthcare, and social services almost to nothing, and a massive crime wave keeps women indoors. Men who can obtain things of actual value, like food and fuel, will have as many wives as they want.
 
Last edited:

collapsitarian

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
the Mormon founders died off and new generations came of age with a one-to-one sex ratio and early marriage, polygyny no longer served any purpose and was abolished. Polygyny is not a way of life -- it's a temporary measure to re-boot society after a slut-ocalypse, or in Paraguay's case, after a war that killed most of the male population.
Mormons cucked on polygamy because it was required for Utah to become a state. The ones that are now in Mexico or in the "cult" compounds are the descendants of the ones that kept the practice and broke off. Mormon leaders would have had access to multiple women regardless of the sex ratios so I doubt they would have abandoned it otherwise. Monogamy has always been apart of white culture. I think trying to change things up even for a short while would be a slippery slope of problems.
 

Freedom Monk

Truth and Liberty above all else!
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
Escaped True Master
Hmm... But how would this be different than what we have now with this "womans liberation" stranglehold of the sexual dynamics? As we know, we have the 80/20 rule where woman are only having sex with the Chadiest of Chads available in our society and woman are willing to share access to Chad to get the thrill of Chad cock and get knocked up with his alpha genes. The only thing that isn't "natural" about this peak hypergamous arrangement is that Chad has no pressure to take care of his children that he leaves behind from his 'pump and dumps'.

So really, if one man is taking "multiple wives" and other men are still suffering from inceldom due to not having the genes that make good looks, how would this be different than what we have now with feminist domination of the sexual marketplace?
 

Spodermen

Well-known member
Old World Underground
⏰
Prolly work out good as long as the women are chained up in a basement.
 

DaveA

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
Hmm... But how would this be different than what we have now with this "womans liberation" stranglehold of the sexual dynamics?
It would be very different because each woman would be bound to *one* man, not free to hop from one harem to another.

Chads are not a society; they cannot work together because they're always fucking each other's whores. Chads are not as fertile as you think -- most Chadlings end up in the dumpster at Planned Parenthood so their mothers can keep slutting around. Nor can Chads protect their born offsping who, when the economy collapses, will be killed and eaten unless they're female and old enough to fuck.
 
Last edited:
Top