This is the Symbol of Forbidden Existence (SFE)

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
So you're saying that the swastika is the symbol of forbidden existence ?
What does the swastika signify? Who does the swastika signify? What has the perception of that significance become? Point to them and tell me. Let me know if this answers your question:
signifier_for_idiots.png

Symbol of Forbidden Existence:
Symbol of Forbidden Existence.jpg

Symbol of Forbidden Existence:
the_white_color.gif


This is a control example to measure one of the many ways people respond to language disruption:
Language&MoralJudgment.png
 

Cathy

Ann G.'s clone
Old World Underground
What does the swastika signify? Who does the swastika signify? What has the perception of that significance become? Point to them and tell me. Let me know if this answers your question:
View attachment 5438

Symbol of Forbidden Existence:
View attachment 5439

Symbol of Forbidden Existence:
View attachment 5440


This is a control example to measure one of the many ways people respond to language disruption:
View attachment 5441
Sigh. You're doing it again, Notsure. You're answering a question with a question.
I want a yes or no answer; don't complicate things.
 

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
This is quality of shills that I get:
>"You avoid questions"
please ask your question
>"I don't have questions"
(This is not me begging for shills)
 

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
Sigh. You're doing it again, Notsure. You're answering a question with a question.
I want a yes or no answer; don't complicate things.
>only yes or only no
That is reduction to absurdity. We share knowledge together as a shared state of knowing, however only you can interpret symbols for you. The purpose here was to demonstrate how such things can be ambiguous outside the unknowing persons field of vision. This is a very important detail. I will never post anything with such detail to communicate a yes or no unless it is a moral imperative. Does this answer your question? How else may I assist you to help me ascend?
 

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
Sigh. You're doing it again, Notsure. You're answering a question with a question.
I want a yes or no answer; don't complicate things.
ok. ok. Allow me to quote myself and below you will find your YESes and NOs

where these people do not exist these standards do not apply
An alleged "very German" American-style-English posting user has identified a place where the enforcement of this standard is not so much a matter of importance. In that place those people have a shared state of knowing that does not consider the swastika to be a Symbol of Non-Existence (SNE) however it is not sure if that same shared state of knowledge is extended to the alleged "very German" American-style-English posting user. After observing his use of color to signify the existence of himself among the people he alleged loves, It is 100% true that his location is within the continental United States of America and has never once been located anywhere on the Continent of Europe among the unique people there of unique human expression. Given that this is true, the alleged "very German" American-style-English posting user would be himself the actual(confirm w/ actualism.gif) Symbol of Non-Existence (SNE) which has been signified by his confirmation of not expressing the beauty of his unique expression. A person could easily derive a YES from this and a No.
Indians don't give a fuck either. They have swastikas everywhere.
That's the key. I'm very German so I've probably been made more aware of this than say English people.
 

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
Aaahhh. He doesn't Hail Victory.
Evasive.
Victory is the pursuit of definition because being the direction is knowing. I thought I would see you there together with us along the path towards Victory? Why did you not detect my presence?
 

Cathy

Ann G.'s clone
Old World Underground
ok. ok. Allow me to quote myself and below you will find your YESes and NOs



An alleged "very German" American-style-English posting user has identified a place where the enforcement of this standard is not so much a matter of importance. In that place those people have a shared state of knowing that does not consider the swastika to be a Symbol of Non-Existence (SNE) however it is not sure if that same shared state of knowledge is extended to the alleged "very German" American-style-English posting user. After observing his use of color to signify the existence of himself among the people he alleged loves, It is 100% true that his location is within the continental United States of America and has never once been located anywhere on the Continent of Europe among the unique people there of unique human expression. Given that this is true, the alleged "very German" American-style-English posting user would be himself the actual(confirm w/ actualism.gif) Symbol of Non-Existence (SNE) which has been signified by his confirmation of not expressing the beauty of his unique expression. A person could easily derive a YES from this and a No.
So that's a yes. Thank you Notsure.
 

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
Sigh. You're doing it again, Notsure. You're answering a question with a question.
I want a yes or no answer; don't complicate things.
OK! I have gone through a tremendously enormous-like vast magnitude of trouble to identify specifically with divine precision what actual non-existence is and what actual unique expression of being may be like so that we may be together along the path towards Victory.
Actual Symbol of Non-Existence (ASNE).png

We can then verify this with actualism.gif to confirm that the transmission has been properly reduced from complexity into a proper communicative format and received by @Cathy and incorporated into our shared state of knowing:
actulism.gif

It is with great sorrow that we must confirm that @Hans Frank 's actual existence has not been detected. We wish to see him with us along the path towards Victory at any moment upon realization of his true beauty of expressions. Procedures are underway to assist this memeber (in a state of becoming) recover his proper state of being
 

Cathy

Ann G.'s clone
Old World Underground
OK! I have gone through a tremendously enormous-like vast magnitude of trouble to identify specifically with divine precision what actual non-existence is and what actual unique expression of being may be like so that we may be together along the path towards Victory.
View attachment 5460

We can then verify this with actualism.gif to confirm that the transmission has been properly reduced from complexity into a proper communicative format and received by @Cathy and incorporated into our shared state of knowing:
View attachment 5461

It is with great sorry that we must confirm that @Hans Frank 's actual existence has not been detected. We wish to see him with us along the path towards Victory at any moment upon realization of his true beauty of expressions. Procedures are underway to assist this memeber (in a state of becoming) recover his proper state of being
You, sir, are an angel. 👼
Once again, thank you. 😘
 

Al_Bundy

Blind Stock Car Driver
Old World Underground
>only yes or only no
That is reduction to absurdity. We share knowledge together as a shared state of knowing, however only you can interpret symbols for you. The purpose here was to demonstrate how such things can be ambiguous outside the unknowing persons field of vision. This is a very important detail. I will never post anything with such detail to communicate a yes or no unless it is a moral imperative. Does this answer your question? How else may I assist you to help me ascend?
I think the best way to communicate to normal people is through the reduction to absurdity. Most everyone here understand what you are trying to say, and they will continue to ask in such simple terms. If you cannot answer in short, simple answers then you won't be able to talk to others who are new, or normies.
 

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
This is definitely a topic I take interest in. Cathy's question could not be answered with a yes-no distinction. The context had to be reconfigured. This was quite a complex message which required a person who was willing to reconsider what they understood before reading it. You could have read the entire thing and only see what you wanted. The goal here was to expand the context. this could not be done with yes-no.
Loser_Thoughts.jpg
think the best way to communicate to normal people
Lets be clear that we are not advertising a new Nabisco cookie. We are challenging core ideological beliefs of true believers most of whom are not seeking to be convinced but rather do the convincing. Many are not just looking for the correct statistical data that will force them to reinvent their entire life and all people they have surrounded themselves with who believe like them. They want to force absurdity in ways that prevent themselves from being challenged. As you can see this entire topic can get very complicated. Simplicity is necessary, but how simple is not always clear or the same for everyone. I try multiple things simultaneously. I usually want to focus on results and what conception people have of themselves within what context.
1587654854654.png
Consider what things Star Wars and Apple are willing to do for true believers in their products.
 

Amalek

New member
this is good info. don't know what you're talking about
There is such a thing as too much information, you may have good intentions I don't know for sure, you may just be an honest sperg.

A large factor that has been debilitating our efforts (the spazzed hands and contorted face type of debilitation) is spergs trying to share their personal epiphany with all the world, tolerance is not a virtue.
 

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
This is all about collapsing a quantum superposition of perception.
It is not at all inaccurate. You are much closer to the alliance than you admit. A matter of ongoing debate that approaches levels of absurdity which can only be settled by collapsing a superposition of perception. It could have been predicted that the empiricist would not recognize when the age of empiricism ended, instead he will make absurd claims such as history itself ending instead of the age of empiricism. The empiricist does not see that history is perceived by humans through human knowledge, not by positive affirmations in academic scripture. The age itself was only ever his own perception of it existing. It did not exist because he made it exist. It was made for him to exist. They are true believers not believers in truth!

That belief is a product of trust which we rely on each other to occur to determines our path in nature. Being the direction is knowing
I_killed_it.png
1582485625846.jpg
 
Last edited:

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
There is such a thing as too much information, you may have good intentions I don't know for sure, you may just be an honest sperg.

A large factor that has been debilitating our efforts (the spazzed hands and contorted face type of debilitation) is spergs trying to share their personal epiphany with all the world, tolerance is not a virtue.
This is incorrect. Where do the origins of your information come from if not from these "spergs"
your_participation_was_voluntary.jpg

The problem that you have is noise needing reduction. The only solution to this is the very topic of this post!!!! Reduction from complexity into symbolic language so that novel information (surprise factor of information value) can communicate its significance. This is accomplished by achieving a shared state of knowing recursive, so that information more significant can achieve scale and order according to purpose!

Your problem is true believers, not believers in truth!!!

I have much more about this being developed into an analysis of Grand Strategy
 
Last edited:

Maxipupu

Active member
This is what classical information theory attempts to do but the results are so shocking, and contradictory as to make hard to believe. The answers, "no" or "uh-huh", are "no" because those are the answers that you are getting now by your redundant academic metaphors or your inherently mathematical mind tricks . That is my reply. Again, the answer is no. Who am I to tell you differently? I am only an open mind (and today, however, this time, I have too say) and butthole.
 

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
I'm forgot to answer this. so here
and contradictory
It is important to recognize that paradoxes do exist as a natural form of our reality. The solution to this is metaphysics (see chad vs. Virgin above). Always has been. Always will be. Metaphysics precedes politics. Realigion is the Poetry of Politics. I thought I felt as though this was communicated as it is central to theme. I will see if there are better ways to extract what needs to be said. Let me know if you have any questions. Your state of becoming is important to The Alliance.

Whitehead sums it up in a really good quote but I can't find it right now. have an Aristotle instead.
Aristotle-being.jpg
 

Maxipupu

Active member
I'm forgot to answer this. so here

It is important to recognize that paradoxes do exist as a natural form of our reality. The solution to this is metaphysics (see chad vs. Virgin above). Always has been. Always will be. Metaphysics precedes politics. Realigion is the Poetry of Politics. I thought I felt as though this was communicated as it is central to theme. I will see if there are better ways to extract what needs to be said. Let me know if you have any questions. Your state of becoming is important to The Alliance.

Whitehead sums it up in a really good quote but I can't find it right now. have an Aristotle instead.
View attachment 6210
You need to become to know that the properties of your state of becoming are not exclusive to your state of being in the position you are now. Your state of being allows your state of becoming to be used by any entity that wants to use your state of becoming in their intentions. When your state of becoming is used, it is performed through another entity. Your state of becoming must also be in the place in which you are now. That is, all of your abilities, memories, abilities that are special.
 

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
You need to become to know that the properties of your state of becoming are not exclusive to your state of being in the position you are now. Your state of being allows your state of becoming to be used by any entity that wants to use your state of becoming in their intentions. When your state of becoming is used, it is performed through another entity. Your state of becoming must also be in the place in which you are now. That is, all of your abilities, memories, abilities that are special.
hand drawing itself.jpg
Your poetry is true. Knowledge is true power that we may refer to in others for scale of our choices and judgments. Being the direction is knowing where you are. A measurement that we can only experience
Nietzsche BGE.gif
 

evolvefest

Orthodox Christian- Berserker Class
Old World Underground
Whole Lotta PilPul and JewGib going on here. The Swastika repels demons, although not nearly as effectively as the Christian Cross.

Deeply embrace whatever the Jews deeply reject: a solid heuristic 👍🏻
 
Top