This is the Symbol of Forbidden Existence (SFE)

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
It is the only Symbol of Forbidden Existence. It is not that: "This is the story of a people in the past that we judge who should not exist". It is that: "This is the standard for which we judge all people who should not exist". Who does this symbol represent? Point to them and tell me. It is most interesting however that not all people use this as their standard to judge all people who should not exist. A specific people can be identified as the origins of this standard. All people are forbidden from noticing the origins of this standard where these people exist, and where these people do not exist these standards do not apply. The people who forbid this noticizing of the people from which this standard originates demand to exist in all places the people exist to which this standard can be applied.


Who are these people? Can people separate themselves from this standard by identifying these people? Or is it better to distinguish yourself from this standard by recognizing each other? But how do you recognize each other without a symbol of existence? Is it the symbol of existence and the only symbol of existence? Perhaps a new symbol of existence would require them a new Symbol of Forbbidence. They would have to identify themselves and identify who is forbidden. It would not be good for them if they had to do this too much where it does not look to good for them.

The answer can only be simplified from complexity. Quite literally. Because that is what a symbol is. A symbol is that which reduces information known and recursive(you know that I know what we know) into a more simple form that can be inferred to indirectly. It does not have to be an image. This process applies to all forms of human expression. Symbols allow for more complex information to be communicated because the entropic value of language has finite limitation. Symbols are meaning. The most complex thing humans can ever communicate to each other is their existence. It has to be a symbol. It is possible to do this with language. It is possible to do this with all language. You do this with all of your language, unless someone else does this with all of your language for you. Who does this for your language?
actulism.gif
(actualism)



>monism<.jpg
(monism)



being (Parmenides).png

This is the symbol of being according to Parmenides straight from wiki. But is that it? is that all beings need? Is the symbol of being alone enough to communicate its existence? Is the symbol of being alone enough to communicate its purpose. Is the symbol of being alone enough to communicate the purpose of its existence. Being the direction is knowing. We cannot be alone and we cannot know alone. Being must be done together the direction of which implies a relationship of coexistence.






direction of being.png
Is that what this is? A relationship of coexistence? Who gave that to who? How do they know it is the right direction. Being The Direction Is Knowing. The direction of change to the extent that being is limitation. Who does this to your language? If you didn't know this it was me. I did this to your language, and someone did this to me. From the past into the future through the forward direction of time. This is the power of symbols. Being the direction is knowing
 

Attachments

Last edited:

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
The swastika is basically a star chart showing the big dipper at the solstices and equinoxes. Trying to outlaw it is an act of cultural genocide.
Konrad Lorenze3.jpg

But they did outlaw it. in every. single. way. What are you going to do about it? What can you do?

>Perhaps a new symbol of existence would require them a new Symbol of Forbbidence. They would have to identify themselves and identify who is forbidden. It would not be good for them if they had to do this too much where it does not look to good for them.

But people need to identify with that symbol of existence. Or it needs to be the symbol they identify with
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seb

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
I think the Jew World Order is coming down. The swastika is a perfect symbol of rejection. Indians don't give a fuck either. They have swastikas everywhere.
It isn't to people who reject it as a symbol of their existence. It isn't to people who use it to forbid the existence of themselves and others. So this is where you settle? You accept being told not to exist? Does this acquire for you moral good? Do you understand the necessity of moral good in philosophy of warfare? or is it that you have no Will to fight for your existence?
 

Auslander-Raus!

At the circus the clowns don’t talk.
Old World Underground
Indians don't give a fuck either. They have swastikas everywhere.

Lord Ganesha is one such God who is worshiped in the beginning of every prayer, yagna, religious ceremony and even new things are welcomed with 'Swastik' symbol which is drawn on using red sacred powder (KUMKUM). As per hindu tradition, devotees also wear yellow and orange 'kumkum'. Now the question arises....
 

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
It is all so simple I cannot think of it alone. that is why I am not sure
 

Donk

Lifted
It is the only Symbol of Forbidden Existence. It is not that: "This is the story of a people in the past that we judge who should not exist". It is that: "This is the standard for which we judge all people who should not exist". Who does this symbol represent? Point to them and tell me. It is most interesting however that not all people use this as their standard to judge all people who should not exist. A specific people can be identified as the origins of this standard. All people are forbidden from noticing the origins of this standard where these people exist, and where these people do not exist these standards do not apply. The people who forbid this noticizing of the people from which this standard originates demand to exist in all places the people exist to which this standard can be applied.


Who are these people? Can people separate themselves from this standard by identifying these people? Or is it better to distinguish yourself from this standard by recognizing each other? But how do you recognize each other without a symbol of existence? Is it the symbol of existence and the only symbol of existence? Perhaps a new symbol of existence would require them a new Symbol of Forbbidence. They would have to identify themselves and identify who is forbidden. It would not be good for them if they had to do this too much where it does not look to good for them.

The answer can only be simplified from complexity. Quite literally. Because that is what a symbol is. A symbol is that which reduces information known and recursive(you know that I know what we know) into a more simple form that can be inferred to indirectly. It does not have to be an image. This process applies to all forms of human expression. Symbols allow for more complex information to be communicated because the entropic value of language has finite limitation. Symbols are meaning. The most complex thing humans can ever communicate to each other is their existence. It has to be a symbol. It is possible to do this with language. It is possible to do this with all language. You do this with all of your language, unless someone else does this with all of your language for you. Who does this for your language?
View attachment 5034
(actualism)



View attachment 5022
(monism)



View attachment 5033

This is the symbol of being according to Parmenides straight from wiki. But is that it? is that all beings need? Is the symbol of being alone enough to communicate its existence? Is the symbol of being alone enough to communicate its purpose. Is the symbol of being alone enough to communicate the purpose of its existence. Being the direction is knowing. We cannot be alone and we cannot know alone. Being must be done together the direction of which implies a relationship of coexistence.






View attachment 5035
Is that what this is? A relationship of coexistence? Who gave that to who? How do they know it is the right direction. Being The Direction Is Knowing. The direction of change to the extent that being is limitation. Who does this to your language? If you didn't know this it was me. I did this to your language, and someone did this to me. From the past into the future through the forward direction of time. This is the power of symbols. Being the direction is knowing

Is it the jews? :unsure:
 

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
Is it the jews? :unsure:
Jew is a title. Words of power. How best is this defined would be a better question.
 

Donk

Lifted
Jew is a title. Words of power. How best is this defined would be a better question.
I know, just kidding. :)

Now think about this: Jesus specifically said to NOT make a symbol that supposedly represented His teachings. Just sayin'. :unsure:o_O
 

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
I know, just kidding. :)

Now think about this: Jesus specifically said to NOT make a symbol that supposedly represented His teachings. Just sayin'. :unsure:o_O
Abrahamic text are symbolic fiction. If what this means is not to misrepresent the story, this has already been done repeatedly in the story we think is real. Then you have people who will say that making symbols is "forbidden". This is as absurd as it would to say, "do not think or speak". If that is what the Abrahamic temple is we can easily determine that it is not a good thing to follow and in direct conflict with Indo-European expressions of spirituality. What is the real temple? There is only our temple, and whoever was guarding it got smoked a long time ago.
 
Top