They are Still Saying “Keev”

Andrew Anglin

Guest
DOWN GOES BIDEN pic.twitter.com/yxHhRWOJyC

— Barstool Sports (@barstoolsports) June 18, 2022

I watched some TV on Sunday, which was a mistake. But sometimes, you want to turn on the Sunday shows, just to check the tone.

The anti-Biden thing is real, and was a bit shocking. It seems to be getting more extreme. Apparently, some strategists in DC have decided that the Democrats will do better in the midterms if they all attack Joe Biden and say they have no relationship to his lunatic agendas. It’s obviously the opposite – Joe Biden has no relationship to his lunatic agendas, Joe Biden doesn’t even know where he is most of the time. But okay, whatever – maybe pretending Joe Biden is making all these horrible decisions himself without the input of the party at large will play well for them.

I think it’s basically an act of total desperation to throw Biden under the bus. I don’t think it was exactly planned. I don’t think they thought this was turn into this big of a disaster. At the same time, I think they knew it was possible, which is why they forced through Joe Biden as the nominee, even when they were going to cheat regardless so it didn’t really matter who the candidate was (except that they wouldn’t tolerate Bernie). Joe obviously can’t defend himself. Anyone else would be trying to push back against his entire party blaming him for a bunch of decisions he didn’t have any role in making.

This was from last Sunday, and is sort of the epitome of what is going on, as AOC is the face of the party:

Joe Biden has no chance in 2024 if AOC won’t even endorse him…you can see the embarrassment on her face when she was asked the question pic.twitter.com/DcMfUDUaJQ

— Alex Stein #99 (@alexstein99) June 12, 2022

It’s a bizarre plan, which I’ve never seen before, to have the party and the party’s media throwing the president under the bus as a midterms strategy. I’m trying to think if it’s what I would do if I were them, and I probably would. I don’t really see any other course of action to boost support other than to either completely change course (which they are not going to do) or just blame it all on Biden.

If Biden was conscious, he would probably pull something out like “it’s time to cancel all student loan debt.” That would actually be popular, and something that would make sense as a midterm promise. But that Democrat talking point that is actually popular is nowhere to be seen when they are actually in power – all we get is war, inflation, food shortages, and many other things people hate. The issues that play to the base are largely irrelevant to anyone’s normal life – gun control is purely emotional, and it doesn’t seem particularly important when you can barely pay for gas and food – or if you’re in an income bracket where tax and food don’t matter and you’re watching the stock market collapse. None of these emotional abstractions matter.

I think there is going to be a backlash against the war at some point, because the Democrats themselves have blamed rising prices on their own war. Republicans – who all also support the war – are saying that Biden is lying when he blames the war for rising prices. I wouldn’t go so far as to say “it’s complicated” – the biggest cause of inflation is the coronavirus money-printing bonanza, most of which happened under Trump’s government. Then you have the Biden spending and attacks on the energy industry. But saying that these anti-Russia sanctions are not causing a rise in prices is just wrong.

These sanctions are causing a rise in energy costs across the board, which is an “everything tax,” because everything is transported using trucks that use gasoline. And of course the energy markets are all tied together, so these sanctions mean that home heating/cooling explodes too. Everything goes up (except the stock market and crypto, lol).

This is the gas price chart:



So when Republicans say “it’s not Putin’s price hike” – that’s true, but not in the way they mean it. Obviously, Putin didn’t sanction Russia. Joe Biden sanctioned Russia. The claim that Biden had no choice but to sanction Russia in response to the Ukraine invasion is obviously wrong – he could have just done nothing at all.

But the Republicans who claim that the rising prices have nothing to do with Biden’s sanctions on Russia are just lying in the most ridiculous way imaginable.

It’s also funny that Biden can’t ever say “it was Trump who printed all that money for the coronavirus hoax!”

Anyway, it’s all just retarded. It’s too retarded to even think about, frankly.

But I was shocked yet again Sunday morning to hear these people saying “Keev” in reference to Kiev. It was bad enough when they changed “The Ukraine” to “Ukraine.” But changing the pronunciation of the word from the English pronunciation is just too much.

You know, we hear all of these stuff about the poor Mexicans. It’s a main talking point. Now, can you imagine, if out of respect for oppressed immigrants, the entire media, all at once, started calling Mexico “Meh-hee-ko”?


Because that would be the exact same thing. Literally, it would be the exact analog of saying “Keev.” Telling people that it is important to pronounce locations of suffering people in their own language is like…. look, it’s like applying gender pronouns to geopolitics.

This is behavior programming – if you get people to start changing their behavior, including their language, they are more submissive to you after they’ve agreed to submit to the behavior change. Any person who actually started saying “Keev” instead of Kiev is going to be much more committed to the war than someone who refused to change the way they pronounced a word.

Honestly, I think they could do “Meh-hee-ko” at this point and no one would flinch. I kind of hope they do, just because it would be funny to me. “Keev” just makes me sick, but “Meh-hee-ko” would be funny.

Continue reading...
 

Flaps McKinley

I know all there is to know about the crying game.
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
If Biden was conscious, he would probably pull something out like “it’s time to cancel all student loan debt.” That would actually be popular, and something that would make sense as a midterm promise.
LOL it would also guarantee that Biden would be JFK'd by a Wall Street-funded assassin.

My worry about these obvious attempts to get Biden out is that they are also being backed by neocon elements who want war with Russia and who see Biden's reticence to get into a direct war with Russia as a stumbling block to their plans. We all remember what Biden said at the first stage of the war, unscripted - it was clear that even through his dementia, he knew that a war with Russia would be disastrous for America, and he made sensible noises to this end (which were of course, then negated by his "handlers").
 

CMcGillicutty

Well-known member
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
The anti-Biden thing is real, and was a bit shocking. It seems to be getting more extreme. Apparently, some strategists in DC have decided that the Democrats will do better in the midterms if they all attack Joe Biden and say they have no relationship to his lunatic agendas. It’s obviously the opposite – Joe Biden has no relationship to his lunatic agendas, Joe Biden doesn’t even know where he is most of the time. But okay, whatever – maybe pretending Joe Biden is making all these horrible decisions himself without the input of the party at large will play well for them.

I think it’s basically an act of total desperation to throw Biden under the bus. I don’t think it was exactly planned. I don’t think they thought this was turn into this big of a disaster. At the same time, I think they knew it was possible, which is why they forced through Joe Biden as the nominee, even when they were going to cheat regardless so it didn’t really matter who the candidate was (except that they wouldn’t tolerate Bernie). Joe obviously can’t defend himself. Anyone else would be trying to push back against his entire party blaming him for a bunch of decisions he didn’t have any role in making.
It's starting to get so bad we're seeing something I hypothesized might happen. I.e. the Bolsonaro effect, where the ruling leftists become so corrupt and unhinged that even Latin American mongrels start looking for a White, rightist strongman to come along and clean house. And we saw that with this Mexican lady winning as a republican in the special congressional election held in the heavily blue 90% Mexican border district last week.


Mexicans actually end up voting for White presidents in Mexico all the time tbh. Take a look at Wikipedia's list of Mexican presidents, there's very little injun admixture to be found in those portraits. The drug cartel bosses also tend to be Whiter than average. Even Mexican beer was actually all brought to Mexico and brewed there by Germans. Mexico and indeed much of Latin America is a de facto racial caste society and everyone down there knows Criollos are on top. If you want to get things done halfway right down there, you go to the Criollos. Peru even elected a Japanese guy as their president in the 90s; they know that the Asians are their superiors too, albeit much rarer to find in latin America.

But at any rate, I'm not saying the neocohens were right about the Mexicans being "natural conservatives" meme. But I am saying even the Mexicans' patience has its limits.

Of course when the democrats start flooding borderland Mexican communities with all these illegals, many of whom are from Africa and Haiti now, and all the drugs and violence that comes with that, when the democrats completely blow up the supply chain and rationing becomes widespread for the first time in 80 years, when the democrats print trillions of dollars and further blow up the economy by embargoing one of the largest commodities markets on Earth and the stuff you can buy becomes much more expensive, and when the democrats come along and tell you they're going to put a drag queen in every school and take your beef away (Mexicans love their tacos) yes, you're going to find enough of them defect to the GOP in certain areas that if you don't have election fraud with fake mail in ballot dumps, the democrats are going to find themselves in real trouble.
 

Benvenuto Cellini

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
I have a very old globe in my house, and it says Kiev. The Brandon Administration is made up of the dumbest Jews on planet earth intent on destroying everything including language. This blatant retardation of the administration is desperation.
 

DaveA

Well-known member
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️
I too believe we should start saying 'Meh-hee-ko'. Maybe it's tine we treat these spe-eeeks and beee-ners with reee-sp-ehh-ct. It is tine. Hightine.
When Cortez arrived, it was "Meshiko", and Spanish wrote the "sh" sound with the letter "x", as Portuguese still does today. For Mexican place names like "Chicxulub", you should read "x" as "sh".

By the 19th century, Spanish no longer had a "sh" sound and Spaniards started writing "Mejico" to reflect the modern pronunciation, a spelling that Mexicans found deeply offensive.
 

JR_Rustler_III

🇰🇷 Gookwaffen 🇯🇵
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖 💻🥩
Destructive Ceremonious Master
If Biden was conscious, he would probably pull something out like “it’s time to cancel all student loan debt.”
Yeah, as far as I can tell, this would be easy to do, because ~92% of all student debt is owned by the Federal government. I was surprised to learn the size of this number, as I thought that a lot more student debt was privately held.

Screen Shot 2022-06-20 at 3.08.23 PM.png


Student loan debt represents over 20% of the assets of the Federal government:

Screen Shot 2022-06-20 at 3.12.54 PM.png

Attempting to unravel government finances is both tiresome and perilous, but as far as I can tell, the US Treasury currently earns about $33 billion per year in interest from its student loan holdings. While that sounds like a lot of money, it doesn't really amount to very much when you consider that the US government collected $4 trillion last year. So it's not like forgiving the loans would have much impact on the Federal government's massive deficits.

So, it seems clear that forgiving 90%+ of student debt is (1) clearly do-able, (2) will have no meaningful impact on government finances, and (3) would be incredibly popular among young Democrat voters. So, why aren't the Democrats doing it? The only possible reasons are:

* Democrats don't actually give a crap about their constituents who are carrying student debt, and would prefer to keep them enslaved for now
* This would be a one-time political windfall, and the Democrats don't want Biden getting the benefit of that windfall

I think both reasons are probably true. The Democrats can totally take their student-debt-slave constituents for granted, because it's not like they are going to vote Republican any time soon, for any reason. So they probably want to keep this one-time-use chit in the bag until they feel they absolutely have to play it.

 
Last edited:
Top