The Supreme Court’s Day of Reckoning is Coming

Gian

Well-known member
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖 💻🥩🥃
Destructive Ceremonious Master
The Supreme Court’s Day of Reckoning is Coming
@Panzerhund @TimeBandit @Highlander @Coltraine @PotstickerSwatstika @Auslander-Raus! @Budd Dwyer @Cathy @Vilis_Hāzners @Werwolf @RickGozinya

The election of 2020 is going to lay bare the dereliction of the Supreme Court for all to see. The COVD-19 pandemic gave numerous state election officials an excuse to implement far-reaching changes to our election processes. Those changes obviously made our systems vulnerable to fraud. States implemented massive mail-in balloting at the same time they relaxed ballot security and voter identification. They even extended the voting periods -- to give the criminals more time to commit their fraud.

All these changes were unconstitutional. The Constitution clearly gives the various state legislatures the authority to define how their elections will be conducted -- not state election officials. Election officials are only empowered to conduct elections within the rules set forth by their respective legislatures -- except, apparently, during a pandemic. There must be a pandemic emanation hidden in a penumbra of the Constitution we didn’t know about. Alarmed that the changes would invite fraud, various organizations filed lawsuits to stop the changes.

The Supreme Court declined to get involved. It ruled that the plaintiffs lacked standing because nobody had been harmed -- yet. Since the election hadn’t happened, nobody was damaged, and there was no case to be heard. They were thinking like a civil court, not the defenders of the Constitution they are sworn to be. It was a cowardly way to stay out of the political controversy. Unfortunately, it also missed an opportunity to defend the Constitution, which was clearly under attack.

After all the ad-hoc changes had been allowed to stand, the election of 2020 saw an unprecedented number of irregularities -- too many to ignore. Election observers were banned from observing the election. Counting stopped in the middle of the night and then restarted after boxes of ballots were mysteriously found. There are reports of ballots being driven across state lines -- by the truckload. There were even precincts that counted more ballots than there were registered voters! A number of states filed lawsuits against the states in which these irregularities occurred.

Even though the Supreme Court is supposed to be the arbiter of cases between states, it again refused to get involved. They ruled that Texas couldn’t sue Pennsylvania because Texans had their votes accurately counted and therefore were not harmed by Pennsylvania. Apparently having the wrong president crammed down the throats of Texans is not considered “harm.” Given the flood of illegal aliens President Asterisk has invited -- and the crime that has accompanied them -- would the justices consider Texas “harmed” now?
A number of other cases were dropped because the court considered them “moot.” The election had been certified and nothing was going to change that -- hence no need to look at the evidence. In the immortal words of Hillary Rodham Clinton, “At this point what difference does it make?”

The court seems to have three distinct voting blocs:

  1. The oath keepers -- These are the justices that are willing to stand up and defend the Constitution even if it means they’ll have to endure attacks. Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch make up this bloc.
  2. The jellyfish -- These are the justices that lack the spine to face controversy. They’re more concerned about defending the court than the Constitution. Justices Roberts, Barrett, and Kavanaugh make up this bloc.
  3. The subversives -- These are the justices that have been using penumbras and emanations to rewrite the constitution in pursuit of social engineering. Justices Kagan, Sotomayor, and Breyer make up this bloc.

It’s rumored that only three justices wanted to hear the 2020 election lawsuits. Does anyone doubt that it was those who comprise the “oath keepers” bloc?

Now, Chief Justice Roberts has placed his court in a trick-box. By choosing to stay out of the election controversy, John Roberts has bet the court’s reputation that the mysteries of the election would remain mysteries. As wagers go, it was not a particularly smart one. The election involved millions of ballots, tens of thousands of election workers, and thousands of counties. If there was fraud, there is too much evidence, in too many hands, to stay hidden.

Tellingly, the Democrats are scrambling to keep the truth hidden, but it’s slowly coming out. State sponsored forensic audits, as well as private investigations, are turning over the stones. We’ll likely know the truth by the end of this year. If it turns out that the election was stolen, the Supreme Court will be exposed as derelict, weak, and useless. It will all be because the jellyfish bloc doesn’t understand the psychology of bullies.

The Supreme Court avoided involvement in the election because they wanted to stay out of the controversy -- they didn’t want to be bullied by the Democrats or the media. There are other possible motives, but they’re even more disturbing. Cowing to bullies will not avoid conflict. Bullies prey on weakness. One has to either stand up to them eventually or accept servitude. Every kid on the playground has learned that lesson by the 8th grade. Apparently, John Roberts hasn’t. Each time Chief Justice Roberts has acceded to the bullies, he’s made the court’s future challenge greater.

Ruling that last minute ad-hoc election changes were unconstitutional would have been relatively straightforward -- but the court didn’t. Hearing the election fraud evidence and adjudicating the result would have created a political crap-storm -- but it would have been the right thing to do. What will become of the court’s reputation if it becomes obvious that the election was stolen and rather than stand up, it sat down?

An April poll by Rasmussen Reports found that 51% of the population believes that fraud affected the election outcome. Does Roberts grasp the significance of that number? It’s the percentage of the population who believe the Supreme Court was derelict in defending the Constitution. If John Roberts wanted to defend the court, perhaps he should have considered pursuit of the truth rather than avoidance of controversy.

A recent Ipsos poll found that 63% of the public thinks it’s time to impose term limits on Supreme Court Justices. The public isn’t stupid. It recognizes that the Supreme Court needs to be taken to the woodshed. The next few months will say a lot about the Supreme Court. Will it correct course, or will it embrace servitude to the mob?

 

Auslander-Raus!

A John Wick behind every blade of grass.
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓
The subversives -- These are the justices that have been using penumbras and emanations to rewrite the constitution in pursuit of social engineering. Justices Kagan, Sotomayor, and Breyer make up this bloc.
Well golly gee! They're all jews who vote in the great traditions of Cardozo and Frankfurter!

At least Ginsburg ist kaput.
 

Quest 4 The Future

Out By Alpha Centauri
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻
Escaped True Master
Article: "All these changes were unconstitutional. The Constitution clearly gives the various state legislatures the authority to define how their elections will be conducted -- not state election officials."

The fact that all these state legislatures allowed "state election officials" to make such rule changes only indicates:

  • These state legislatures willingly violated the law by allowing "state election officials" to make such rule changes
  • Or, these state legislatures are so full of incompetent people that they weren't even aware of their own state laws
Either way, both sides are guilty of gross malfeasance. In other words, the entire US government, at both the federal and state level, is corrupt beyond repair.

THE ONLY SOLUTION
 

Italo-Canadian

Jesus is King
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
And boomers
I don't think boomers really contemplate old age. What do they think is going to happen in the nursing homes to them? Do they imagine that their kids, who barely have their own shit together because they royally fucked everything up, will take care of them like they took care of their parents (sarcasm). Do they think they'll bribe Jamal not to harm or demean them? Do they think anyone will listen to their feeble cries for mercy?
 

CuzinEd

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓
I don't know why people were surprised that the SCOTUS wouldn't get involved in the election. They said in 2000 they weren't going to do it again and that it wasn't their job. It would have been great if they did but ultimately it's not the job of the Supreme Court to decide elections. There are other ways to handle it. Georgia and Arizona could have been handled differently but the GOP fucks in those states refused to do anything cause they wanted Trump gone. It's kind of hard to fight a coup when the people that should be backing you are in on the coup as well. I don't know what could have been done about Pennsylvania and Michigan. If Brian Kempf had just done the right thing in Georgia and the Republicans had done the right thing in Arizona Trump would have had a second term now instead of having to come back and do it all again in 2024.
 

CrackSmokeRepublican

An ancient story of Fhunter Xiden...and the pipe.
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
I don't know why people were surprised that the SCOTUS wouldn't get involved in the election. They said in 2000 they weren't going to do it again and that it wasn't their job. It would have been great if they did but ultimately it's not the job of the Supreme Court to decide elections. There are other ways to handle it. Georgia and Arizona could have been handled differently but the GOP fucks in those states refused to do anything cause they wanted Trump gone. It's kind of hard to fight a coup when the people that should be backing you are in on the coup as well. I don't know what could have been done about Pennsylvania and Michigan. If Brian Kempf had just done the right thing in Georgia and the Republicans had done the right thing in Arizona Trump would have had a second term now instead of having to come back and do it all again in 2024.
CuzinEd do really think the system of government our White ancestors built is really salvageable today -- like made "wise"? Like the right people can be elected or appointed (by POTUS, Congress, etc.) at this point to make America's descent into Clown World salvageable with a press that really tells the story with accuracy and impartiality (Fox? or old Rush?)? You sound like a former GOP chairman at a better Golf Course drinking at the bar planning a local comeback. Immigration, Corporate money, the J-Press MSM, women voting emotionally -- can real plans be made to really make it better in the future? What would the "best" situation look like?
 

Christopher

BLACK RIFLES MATTER
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
CuzinEd do really think the system of government our White ancestors built is really salvageable today -- like made "wise"? Like the right people can be elected or appointed (by POTUS, Congress, etc.) at this point to make America's descent into Clown World salvageable with a press that really tells the story with accuracy and impartiality (Fox? or old Rush?)? You sound like a former GOP chairman at a better Golf Course drinking at the bar planning a local comeback. Immigration, Corporate money, the J-Press MSM, women voting emotionally -- can real plans be made to really make it better in the future? What would the "best" situation look like?
It's not salvageable. Ultimately. The GOP golf-course bar types can't admit the system is nonworkable. The public and " Immigration, Corporate money, the J-Press MSM, women voting emotionally" are still in place. The public doesn't "do the right thing" or even demand it. The most that could be expected is isolated decent working-class Whites taking back government on a local level.
 

DaveA

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
The Republic is dead, so the Supreme Court is just a rubber stamp now. My question is, will the Republican Party disappear completely, or will our rulers hire actors to play Republicans and rig the elections so that some of them win?
 
Top