The Adolf Hitler Center For Kids Who Can't Post Good (and want to learn to do other stuff good too)

EddieBrock

Ladies' Man
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
You want to see a satire post?


This got over a million shares on facebook, counting all the boomer sites that plagiarized it.

1% of the US population read that on the Daily Stormer.

It was so widely shared that snopes had to "fact check" and "debunk" the obvious and hilarious satire


Your post, in contrast, was fucking garbage. It was a single fucking line of text. You deserve physical punishment for your shitty forum cluttering post. If you get raped by a pack of niggers, it will be your fault.
Can I have a Fake News Hoaxer or similarly insulting badge?
 

Slayer

Well-known member
Cave Beast
β°β˜•
Alright, you fucking know what?
Maybe, just maybe, and I'm going out on a limb here, but maybe people are sick and fucking tired of being told what to do, what to wear, where to stand, and what not to do and this place is one of the few reliefs they get from that daily life and now, you're gonna pull that shit here too??

This was never a problem or an issue on the old BBS.

Should I wear a fucking mask when I post too now cocksucker???

Should I stand six feet away from my fucking android???

FUCK OFF!!
 

ex_machina

I had this name before the goddamn movie.
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
Agreed. My problem is basically that when I do have free time, I'd rather spend it actually reading a book myself rather than doing a book review for something I've already read. But I'm going to try to work in something eventually in the future where maybe I just summarize the book as I am reading it in real-time rather than waiting until the whole thing is finished. I think this will help with my problem and at least get this book review ball rolling. Because I do think it would be a good forum feature.
I actually decided to do this once. I was diving into a book I knew others likely wouldn't read but might want to know something about, so I began to provide a running commentary (so to speak) in MS Word on my laptop as I read, trying to summarize each chapter.

Unfortunately, that book was "Martin Heidegger: The Philosophy of Another Beginning" by Alexander Dugin. And I got about half way through before realizing it was utter horseshit. (Actually, the first couple chapters were decent, but once it go into the difficult Heidegger stuff, it was pretty clear Dugin was just trying to dazzle with bullshit.)

Anyway, that was my first and last attempt at that--I haven't read read anything since then that would warrant a review (anyone want to read a review on Hamm radio licensing? etc.). But it was a good exercise that would be good...on a decent book.

Edit: I went to do a quick scan to see if I was embarrassing myself with my dismissal of Dugin (e.g., maybe it was just that I'm too retarded to understand him). In the process, I came across this review by none other than Greg Johnson. Not only was it affirming of my dismissal of Dugin's Heidegger, but it was also a damn lucid exposition of Heidegger's thinking. https://www.counter-currents.com/2014/11/dugin-on-heidegger/

That cocksucker may smoke cocks, but damn if he isn't on the ball intellectually.
 
Last edited:

anti-barabas-ite

Work stuff through in your brain...UNVAXXED
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ–
Escaped True Master
since the style-book is being edited:

make signing up to forum dependant on having an avatar...can't sign in without an email or avatar.
 

FATEWEAVER88

Gang Rape Squad Leader
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬
This is also an excellent rule people should abide by. It is certainly a problem I have seen on this forum, but also to be resolved after the first problem which is too many low-effort threads.
The users that spam post and post low quality threads should be give a Tyrone avatar for awhile that they cannot change and if they continue shitting up the forum revoke their posting privlages and a permanent Tyrone avatar.This is why I miss infinate scrolling of the old forum because I don't like searching through several pages just to find a good thread.I knew this would happen.
 
Last edited:

Herminator

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
I agree the new posts make the site overwhelming. I also think there can be improvement in the way the categories are organized.

1. I had trouble finding this post under a search for Hitler. Instead I had to search "low effort posts". I think anything from Qanon should have it's own category.

2. The categories should be alphabetized. (I spent months jumping from DS to the forum and trying to find the article before I noticed the article category. With general discussion being first a lot of users just jump into that.
3. Mega threads should be uniquely organized.
4. Organization is key from the provider ascpect so limitations or structure should happen there first.
5. Users should be able to easily decipher correct protocol to post in correct categories.
6. Users should use desecration but in this trying time may abuse the general discussion category, which is ok and should be monitored because it does turn it into a kind of alternative twitter, which I have never use but may be the most growing part of the site. Cave beasts and Old Dominian users have been all over the place with threads, therefore I suggest one area where that can continue.
 

Maxbait

Active member
We recently gave a lot of new people the ability to create threads. I think the forum was cluttered previously and now is a total disaster zone. There is only a modicum of thoughtful discussion going on and a ton of threads are simply bait or low-content threads that devolve into people throwing insults at thoughtful replies. It is becoming impossible to locate threads with information that I'm interested in, because people are all starting new threads instead of replying to existing threads. We have precisely one thread that actually uses this forum how it is supposed to be used, the white victims of nigger crime thread:


I watch this thread because it is a subject I'm interested in. It's a daily reminder of why exactly it is so important to do what I do, and what I'm fighting to stop. So every time it is updated, I get a notification on the forum and I can see the update.

You know what would happen if the poster made a unique new thread for each white victim of nonwhite crime? I would see virtually none of them, because I don't have the time to spend all day reading every new forum thread. Most people don't either. You might be extremely online and think your post justifies a new thread. With at least 95% of the content on this forum it does not. It makes it impossible to read and follow for me and nearly anyone that has a job and a family. Lots of content I want to follow is always in a new thread rather than a post in an existing thread I can subscribe to. I'm not going to see it.

The first rule: if you have a post to make, try to put it in an existing thread rather than start a new one. So eventually we have long threads that read like books on given subjects that are posted about here a lot. Media hoaxes, nigger riotousness, women being women. Make it so that when you post an article on a given subject, the maximum number of people are going to see it, because it is in a thread for people who are actually interested in reading about that issue.

The second rule: when making a new thread try to make it something that is worth people putting new posts into. The first post of a thread should be as descriptive and detailed as possible. While it might reference the current day's events, you want it to be kind of general. When crafting an OP, imagine you are writing an introduction to a book on the subject. Put as much effort as you can put into that initial post as possible. New posts in the thread can be quotes from and links to news articles, but you want the OP to leave someone with a good introduction to the subject and why they should be interested in it, as well as include some hatefacts that even someone already interested in the subject might not have known.

I am going to start stickying threads that reasonably conform to these standards. If you do not start making good threads, your threads will be buried on page 3 past the threads that meet these standards. I am also going to start taking thread posting privileges away specifically from people who make unnecessary new threads and clutter the forum. On the carrot side, there will be some kind of reward for people who make really good threads.
Thank you so much for this thread.

This exact problem is why I don't come here too often. Every time I do, I find it really hard to find good threads worth investing time to read.

Well, the other reason is that my computer loads like garbage and I have to load an entirely new browser (one much more secure than any compatible with the browser I must use for work). But that is a minor reason. I still didn't have this problem switching between my work browser and this one for the previous forum, but when I cannot remember the last time I found a good thread, I am far, far less likely to even open the forum. Glad I checked in now though.

Hopefully threads and posts like this send a strong message.
 

Angryguy

Same angryguy new look
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»
So where do movie reviews go. General or gentleman's parlor? Or other
 

ionwhite

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
We recently gave a lot of new people the ability to create threads. I think the forum was cluttered previously and now is a total disaster zone. There is only a modicum of thoughtful discussion going on and a ton of threads are simply bait or low-content threads that devolve into people throwing insults at thoughtful replies. It is becoming impossible to locate threads with information that I'm interested in, because people are all starting new threads instead of replying to existing threads. We have precisely one thread that actually uses this forum how it is supposed to be used, the white victims of nigger crime thread:


I watch this thread because it is a subject I'm interested in. It's a daily reminder of why exactly it is so important to do what I do, and what I'm fighting to stop. So every time it is updated, I get a notification on the forum and I can see the update.

You know what would happen if the poster made a unique new thread for each white victim of nonwhite crime? I would see virtually none of them, because I don't have the time to spend all day reading every new forum thread. Most people don't either. You might be extremely online and think your post justifies a new thread. With at least 95% of the content on this forum it does not. It makes it impossible to read and follow for me and nearly anyone that has a job and a family. Lots of content I want to follow is always in a new thread rather than a post in an existing thread I can subscribe to. I'm not going to see it.

The first rule: if you have a post to make, try to put it in an existing thread rather than start a new one. So eventually we have long threads that read like books on given subjects that are posted about here a lot. Media hoaxes, nigger riotousness, women being women. Make it so that when you post an article on a given subject, the maximum number of people are going to see it, because it is in a thread for people who are actually interested in reading about that issue.

The second rule: when making a new thread try to make it something that is worth people putting new posts into. The first post of a thread should be as descriptive and detailed as possible. While it might reference the current day's events, you want it to be kind of general. When crafting an OP, imagine you are writing an introduction to a book on the subject. Put as much effort as you can put into that initial post as possible. New posts in the thread can be quotes from and links to news articles, but you want the OP to leave someone with a good introduction to the subject and why they should be interested in it, as well as include some hatefacts that even someone already interested in the subject might not have known.

I am going to start stickying threads that reasonably conform to these standards. If you do not start making good threads, your threads will be buried on page 3 past the threads that meet these standards. I am also going to start taking thread posting privileges away specifically from people who make unnecessary new threads and clutter the forum. On the carrot side, there will be some kind of reward for people who make really good threads.
I haven't got privilege to make a thread - but, thanks for making the place easier to navigate.
 

sandhedspile

Well-known member
Cave Beast
β°β˜•πŸš¬
And let's all follow the AP style rules: Capital letter when referring to Blacks, Black on white crime, and Niggers, Sheboons, Street Apes, Bantus, Banjo lips, Baboombas, Americoons, Crayolas, Eggplants (Italianesque), Criminal Factories (pregnant Sheboons), Gutter Monkeys, Jigaboos, Lincoln's Mistakes, etc.
 

Paladin Prime

xxAKA Lex Luthorxx. Only in death does duty end.
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
And let's all follow the AP style rules: Capital letter when referring to Blacks, Black on white crime, and Niggers, Sheboons, Street Apes, Bantus, Banjo lips, Baboombas, Americoons, Crayolas, Eggplants (Italianesque), Criminal Factories (pregnant Sheboons), Gutter Monkeys, Jigaboos, Lincoln's Mistakes, etc.
Honestly, some Italian women are really beautiful. But after I became racially aware, I've come to find pale, white skin much more beautiful than olive-tinted or tanned skin. White women who think they need to have tanned skin have a media-induced psychosis.
 

pen-meister

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“
Yes, can confirm that my favorite threads to read are ones where I learn something from them or provide useful content
tbh, may real post graduate education actually came from threads like this on the DS
 

CMgillicutty2

New member
Hey, @qanon, I have a problem and I don't know where else to address it, and who else to ask.

My original account got temp banned for linkposting in the news forum. The site said it would be lifted Aug 2nd at 12:00 AM. I assumed that was UTC given that seems to be the default for the timestamp on articles posted here.

Well, here it is Aug 2nd, 12:00 AM UTC, and my account is still banned. The time stamp is gone, now it just says my account is banned.

So, am I just permabanned after 4 years, or is this a bug?

I apologize if linkposting is now verboten. I saw a fleeting reference to this a few months ago, but I thought it was more of a recommendation, than a bannable offense. If it was over the thread I started I think it is, I did add a few photos pertaining to the story besides the link. But it was a throwaway story, and I thought the heading in the link plus pictures conveyed all there was to it.
 

WokeAF

Active member
⏰
Where is the search feature on this site?

AA often references Jews being of the devil. I’m looking for any articles or videos detailing Jews not really being the chosen people, being Christ killers, etc. And good stuff on Pizzagate or frazzledrip.

But I can’t search on this site???
 

Panzerhund

✝️Appalachia Brimstone Bro✝️
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ– πŸ’»πŸ₯©πŸ₯ƒ
Destructive Ceremonious Master
Hey, @qanon, I have a problem and I don't know where else to address it, and who else to ask.

My original account got temp banned for linkposting in the news forum. The site said it would be lifted Aug 2nd at 12:00 AM. I assumed that was UTC given that seems to be the default for the timestamp on articles posted here.

Well, here it is Aug 2nd, 12:00 AM UTC, and my account is still banned. The time stamp is gone, now it just says my account is banned.

So, am I just permabanned after 4 years, or is this a bug?

I apologize if linkposting is now verboten. I saw a fleeting reference to this a few months ago, but I thought it was more of a recommendation, than a bannable offense. If it was over the thread I started I think it is, I did add a few photos pertaining to the story besides the link. But it was a throwaway story, and I thought the heading in the link plus pictures conveyed all there was to it.
No no no no

Free @CMcGillicutty
 

MechaPregnantAnneFrank

A fisher of men.
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ–
Hey, @qanon, I have a problem and I don't know where else to address it, and who else to ask.

My original account got temp banned for linkposting in the news forum. The site said it would be lifted Aug 2nd at 12:00 AM. I assumed that was UTC given that seems to be the default for the timestamp on articles posted here.

Well, here it is Aug 2nd, 12:00 AM UTC, and my account is still banned. The time stamp is gone, now it just says my account is banned.

So, am I just permabanned after 4 years, or is this a bug?

I apologize if linkposting is now verboten. I saw a fleeting reference to this a few months ago, but I thought it was more of a recommendation, than a bannable offense. If it was over the thread I started I think it is, I did add a few photos pertaining to the story besides the link. But it was a throwaway story, and I thought the heading in the link plus pictures conveyed all there was to it.
LET MY PEOPLE GO
 

Slayer

Well-known member
Cave Beast
β°β˜•
Yes that's me lol - I have an account there and on wordpress, that's the extent of my online presence.
Ion, good to see you again mein old freund.

We had some great take downs on gab in the day.

Good to see you back again.

Me and you are the last of the Stormer Oligarchs.
 

Coltraine

America First
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ–
Where is the search feature on this site?

AA often references Jews being of the devil. I’m looking for any articles or videos detailing Jews not really being the chosen people, being Christ killers, etc. And good stuff on Pizzagate or frazzledrip.

But I can’t search on this site???
Upper right-hand corner, m'dude:
1596335363746.png
 

WokeAF

Active member
⏰
It’s not there.

I’m guessing you need to be able to post. It seems wonky to need privilege to search. But I’m still grateful for the site.
 

CMcGillicutty

Well-known member
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ–
Hey, @qanon, I have a problem and I don't know where else to address it, and who else to ask.

My original account got temp banned for linkposting in the news forum. The site said it would be lifted Aug 2nd at 12:00 AM. I assumed that was UTC given that seems to be the default for the timestamp on articles posted here.

Well, here it is Aug 2nd, 12:00 AM UTC, and my account is still banned. The time stamp is gone, now it just says my account is banned.

So, am I just permabanned after 4 years, or is this a bug?

I apologize if linkposting is now verboten. I saw a fleeting reference to this a few months ago, but I thought it was more of a recommendation, than a bannable offense. If it was over the thread I started I think it is, I did add a few photos pertaining to the story besides the link. But it was a throwaway story, and I thought the heading in the link plus pictures conveyed all there was to it.
Okay, it's all back to normal now. Thanks @qanon, if it was you who interceded on my behalf, or thanks to someone else if it wasn't.

Can ban the duplicate account.

I will refrain from linkposting in the future.
 
Top