Study: Coronavirus Infections DECREASE After Lockdown Ends!

P

Pomidor Quixote

Guest


On April 17, Anglin warned that the lockdown isn’t a quarantine and it is probably aiding the spread of the virus. Now, a new study shows that the vast majority of countries have fewer coronavirus cases after lifting the lockdown.

Daily Mail:

Coronavirus lockdowns have failed to alter the course of the pandemic but have instead ‘destroyed millions of livelihoods’, a JP Morgan study has claimed.

Falling infection rates since lockdowns were lifted suggest that the virus ‘likely has its own dynamics’ which are ‘unrelated to often inconsistent lockdown measures’, a report published by the financial services giant said.

Denmark is among the countries which has seen its R rate continue to fall after schools and shopping malls re-opened, while Germany’s rate has mostly remained below 1.0 after the lockdown was eased.

The report also shows many US states including Alabama, Wisconsin and Colorado enjoying lower R rates after lockdown measures were lifted.

Author Marko Kolanovic, a trained physicist and a strategist for JP Morgan, said governments had been spooked by ‘flawed scientific papers’ into imposing lockdowns which were ‘inefficient or late’ and had little effect.

Unlike rigorous testing of new drugs, lockdowns were administered with little consideration that they might not only cause economic devastation but potentially more deaths than Covid-19 itself,’ he claimed.

The JP Morgan report includes graphs showing that ‘the vast majority of countries had decreased infection rates’ after lockdowns were lifted.


Infection rates have continued to decline even once a lag period for new infections to become visible is factored in, the report says.

A second graph shows a similar effect in the US, showing that many states saw a lower rate of transmission (R) after full-scale lockdowns were ended.
They included Colorado, Iowa, Alabama, Wyoming, Wisconsin and Mississippi, according to the chart, although not all states are included.

Nevada and North Dakota are among the exceptions which appear to have had a higher rate of transmission since normal life began to resume.

The R rate shows how many people each virus patient typically infects, and some countries regard a rate below 1.0 as a key indicator that the epidemic is in retreat.


‘While we often hear that lockdowns are driven by scientific models, and that there is an exact relationship between the level of economic activity and the spread of [the] virus – this is not supported by the data,’ the report says.

Indeed, virtually everywhere infection rates have declined after re-opening even after allowing for an appropriate measurement lag.

This means that the pandemic and Covid-19 likely have [their] own dynamics unrelated to often inconsistent lockdown measures that were being implemented.’

Those dynamics may be influenced by increased hand-washing and even weather patterns but seemingly not by full-scale lockdowns, the report suggests.

‘The fact that re-opening did not change the course of the pandemic is consistent with studies showing that initiation of full lockdowns did not alter the course of the pandemic either,’ it says.

In some European countries, studies suggest that the measures ‘did not produce any change in pandemic parameters’ such as the R rate, the JP Morgan report says.

Kolanovic says that lockdowns had remained in place even as ‘our knowledge of the virus and lack of effectiveness of total lockdowns evolved’.

At the same time, millions of livelihoods were being destroyed by these lockdowns,’ he writes.
Recently, scientists found that the lockdown has virtually no effect on curbing the spread of the virus, and that the only measures worth doing were closing schools and banning mass gatherings.

All of this comes after random antibody testing in California puts coronavirus in the same threat level as the flu, yet the government continues to pretend this virus is a threat. Virtually no expert not employed by the government is going along with this madness.

It is clear that those in power have an agenda that depends on coronavirus being perceived as an imminent danger.

They don’t want to give you back your rights.

Continue reading...
 

Poundland Mugabe

Well-known member
Old World Underground
Recently, scientists found that the lockdown has virtually no effect on curbing the spread of the virus, and that the only measures worth doing were closing schools and banning mass gatherings.
I'm struggling to understand why I am seeing this often repeated phrase "closing schools was worth doing"
We know kids don't get sick from this flu, they don't have the ability to pass it on to adults.
Why is this statement still being passed around? Am I missing something?
 
Top