Stormer Reading List (The Jewish Problem)

Flaps McKinley

Do you even dilate, bro?
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
Here are some photographs from the book England (Popular Judaica Series) (1978) about the history of Jews in England. It contains many redpills, including that the number of Jews in England went up from 65,000 to 300,000 between 1880 and 1914 as the shtetls of the Russian East were emptied out into London, and then increasing by another 75,000 during WW2 as Central Europe gave us her Semitic bounty.

Britain never stood a chance. We were the Sweden of the 19th/20th century. And efforts to curtail our ruinous "open door" policy which resulted the Aliens Act of 1905 (a nativist reaction to the J influx) came to nothing due to a clause in the act exempting those suffering "political and religious persecution" from any ban on entry. (The Law Parliementary and General Purposes Committee of the British Board of Deputies helpfully kept an eye on all impending legislation to make sure that Jewish interests would not be infringed.)

IMG_0705.JPGIMG_7185.JPGIMG_3563.JPGIMG_2064.JPG
 

Flaps McKinley

Do you even dilate, bro?
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
@Habakkuk Just as per previous message, I listened to the audiobook of Hilaire Belloc's The French Revolution, and I have to say, it wasn't any great shakes. I was looking for a book which was more about the philosophy/spirit of the time, something more esoteric rather than exoteric as a history, and with relevance to today's events, so I wouldn't recommend it as worth your time. At some point I'm going to read Joseph de Maistre, who was a major critic of the French Revolution, being one of the exiled aristocrats, and hailed as "The Father of Reaction", so if I find his work worth reading, I'll let you know (or put the "best bits" on here). Because there are far more books than there are hours in the day, so I would only recommend the best books I come across.
 

Coltraine

America First
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ– πŸ’»
@Habakkuk Just as per previous message, I listened to the audiobook of Hilaire Belloc's The French Revolution, and I have to say, it wasn't any great shakes. I was looking for a book which was more about the philosophy/spirit of the time, something more esoteric rather than exoteric as a history, and with relevance to today's events, so I wouldn't recommend it as worth your time. At some point I'm going to read Joseph de Maistre, who was a major critic of the French Revolution, being one of the exiled aristocrats, and hailed as "The Father of Reaction", so if I find his work worth reading, I'll let you know (or put the "best bits" on here). Because there are far more books than there are hours in the day, so I would only recommend the best books I come across.
I've been reading a lot of de Maistre myself lately. Recently I got this short 150 page book called Contra Mundum: Joseph de Maistre & the Birth of Tradition (2017), and the main reason I chose that particular book is because it focuses on his affiliation with Freemasonry throughout the entirety of his life basically. He is a superb writer and I admire him a lot myself as an intellectual eclectic type I guess who aspired more than anything throughout his life to cure the Protestant-Catholic schism within Christendom. De Maistre was able to successfully marry his own intimate Catholicism exoterically with his spiritual embrace of Freemasonry at the esoteric level, which may seem contradictory at first glance to a lot of people for obvious historical reasons. But of course de Maistre was a product of his time too like everybody else, and Freemasonry was en vogue during the long 18th and 19th Centuries much differently than we think of it today. And the book is mainly about that, about how and why he chose these seemingly incongruent and opposing routes in his own intellectual and spiritual journey, and the creation of the Counter-Enlightenment in general. De Maistre also echoes (or rather presupposes probably) a lot of what E. MIchael Jones says in his JRS books about England being implicated in the origins of the French Revolution itself, which is a story I've told myself many a time here on this forum.

If you're looking for the intellectual history of the French Revolution specifically and the Enlightenment in general, I'd strongly advise picking up Jonathan Israel's newest book Revolutionary Jews from Spinoza to Marx: The Fight for a Secular World of Universal and Equal Rights (2021), which I've reviewed numerous times now as well on this forum, and you can find other things I've said about that book just by searching my history on here. It's a foundational type text that marries well the intellectual origins of the French Revolution with the Jewish Question, and I'd add that it's rather difficult to even address the French Revolution in my opinion in the absence of discussion of what the Jews were doing then at that time and afterward.
 
Last edited:

Flaps McKinley

Do you even dilate, bro?
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
I have another book to recommend, particularly for @Garfisch - The Jews of Georgian England 1714-1830 by Todd M. Endelman (1979, The Jewish Publication Society of America). This book really is a secret history of how modern England came to be, and is full of colourful and extremely redpilling little vignettes of history. Endelman, to his credit, is that rarest of things, a Jewish historian who is fair and balanced and who desires to tell the truth, warts and all, regardless of how it makes the Jews look - a stance, I imagine, due to the fact that this book came from a PhD thesis which he wrote in the 1970s. I don't think it would be thought wise to print some of the things found in this book today, and even he did, he would feel duty-bound to frame it in all kinds of stultifying apolegetic political discourse as Felsenstein had to for his book covering the same period (but which was written in 1990).

One of the biggest eye-openers given our current situation is that basically England had an open-doors policy towards immigrants for centuries, and throughout the 18th century, England was a magnet for the poorest and most criminal Jews of continental Europe - the betteljuden, who could jump on a ship in Holland, cross the channel for free, and enter London without a passport or any kind of control (including no need to "sign up" to an official Jewish community, or kehillot, as existed on the continent to control Jewish behaviour). This made London a criminal's paradise, and indeed, when things got too hot, the criminals could just skip back to Europe, or use their foreign connections to get high-value stolen goods out of the country quickly (the first international organised crime ring, you could say). The oligarchs who ran England had little interest in controlling the situation (this would cost money, and would go against their laissez-faire ideology of minimal government) meaning that most crime went unpunished, and criminals uncaught.* Obviously it wasn't just the Jews who were a problem in London (poverty caused criminality generally, and there were the Irish to consider), but the liberalism of Georgian England, unique in Europe at the time, made it a very secular/irreligious/commercially orientated society for both Christians and Jews, and it was this relative religious indifference (certainly lack of practicing faith), which made England so attractive for Jews looking to acculturate, make money, get ahead in life and in many cases marry and/or have children with non-Jews.

*It should be stated that certain higher-class Jews, particularly Sephardim who had arrived earlier and were frankly a better class than the Ashkenazim were very concerned about this uncontrolled tide of vagrant sludge from Germany and Poland, because they quite rightly saw it as undoing the good work they had done of assimilating and being accepted over the previous 70+ years. They had also been very careful to keep to the terms of the Resettlement, and did not want to draw attention to their presence in the country - a discretion that the later influxes threatened.

Some pictures from the book (there are more, but I won't put them all here).

IMG_0439.JPGIMG_1214.JPGIMG_5611.JPGIMG_6842.JPG
 
Last edited:

Garfisch

Right-Wing Normalist. HOAX WORLD navigator.
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ– πŸ’»πŸ₯©
Destructive Ceremonious Master
I have another book to recommend, particularly for @Garfisch - The Jews of Georgian England 1714-1830 by Todd M. Endelman (1979, The Jewish Publication Society of America).
Ayo my nigga! Found a 1999 reissue on Z-Libray and downloaded. Sadly no pictures though πŸ˜•. Thanks!
Perhaps the β€˜dried rhubarb’ being hawked by the kikes in Georgian London was actually Membrillo?
 
Last edited:

Williams

Well-known member
Cave Beast
β°β˜•
I've been reading a lot of de Maistre myself lately. Recently I got this short 150 page book called Contra Mundum: Joseph de Maistre & the Birth of Tradition (2017), and the main reason I chose that particular book is because it focuses on his affiliation with Freemasonry throughout the entirety of his life basically. He is a superb writer and I admire him a lot myself as an intellectual eclectic type I guess who aspired more than anything throughout his life to cure the Protestant-Catholic schism within Christendom. De Maistre was able to successfully marry his own intimate Catholicism exoterically with his spiritual embrace of Freemasonry at the esoteric level, which may seem contradictory at first glance to a lot of people for obvious historical reasons. But of course de Maistre was a product of his time too like everybody else, and Freemasonry was en vogue during the long 18th and 19th Centuries much differently than we think of it today. And the book is mainly about that, about how and why he chose these seemingly incongruent and opposing routes in his own intellectual and spiritual journey, and the creation of the Counter-Enlightenment in general. De Maistre also echoes (or rather presupposes probably) a lot of what E. MIchael Jones says in his JRS books about England being implicated in the origins of the French Revolution itself, which is a story I've told myself many a time here on this forum.

If you're looking for the intellectual history of the French Revolution specifically and the Enlightenment in general, I'd strongly advise picking up Jonathan Israel's newest book Revolutionary Jews from Spinoza to Marx: The Fight for a Secular World of Universal and Equal Rights (2021), which I've reviewed numerous times now as well on this forum, and you can find other things I've said about that book just by searching my history on here. It's a foundational type text that marries well the intellectual origins of the French Revolution with the Jewish Question, and I'd add that it's rather difficult to even address the French Revolution in my opinion in the absence of discussion of what the Jews were doing then at that time and afterward.
Yo men, I really want to hammer out this Protestant issue and the Jewish influence on it (and the whole English reformation)

as EMJ says the English have a perennial attraction to all things Jewish lol. Im on chapter 5 of JRS , do you know if EMJ has any vids to support his writing on this topic? I believe the chapters on John Dee,Menasseh Ben Israel and freemasonry are the ones you told me to read.

also need to read more about this Cromwell fucker.

and as a side note, how do you reconcile all your knowledge with your own personal faith and still attend a protestant church?
 

Coltraine

America First
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ– πŸ’»
Yo men, I really want to hammer out this Protestant issue and the Jewish influence on it (and the whole English reformation)

as EMJ says the English have a perennial attraction to all things Jewish lol. Im on chapter 5 of JRS , do you know if EMJ has any vids to support his writing on this topic? I believe the chapters on John Dee,Menasseh Ben Israel and freemasonry are the ones you told me to read.

also need to read more about this Cromwell fucker.

and as a side note, how do you reconcile all your knowledge with your own personal faith and still attend a protestant church?
Here's some useful chronologies on Cromwell, Charles II, and company during the 17th Century, which is really the most important century in my opinion, as it's the one where the most fighting happened both in terms of religion and politics as well as just ideologically and intellectually. None of these articles below go nearly as in-depth as Jones' book or those other books I recommended you earlier, but they do serve as a quick rundown of many of the most basic highlights and history you should already be familiarizing yourself with anyway as you dig into the meta-material at a more deeper level:



As far as personal faith and the Protestant Question, it basically just boils down to the fact that I have went to a Protestant church since I've been a kid and my entire extended family too participates in one way or the other in similar churches whether they live close or not, and so ethnically it just makes a lot more practical sense for me to be where they are and vice-versa than if I chose to ghettoize myself in a Catholic Church without any family. I am basically much more attracted to the Catholic perspective on history obviously, but spiritually I currently just prioritize family unity and cohesiveness over personal religious justification, and I'll leave it at that.
 

CrackSmokeRepublican

N***a you better not be charging me Hennessy rate
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
Escaped True Master
With Cromwell always keep in mind he was a Jew Puppet (Financially) during the Civil War. The Brazilian-Dutch Jews along with Cromwell were interested in maximizing Irish settlements on Sugar plantations from occupied lands. Jews were ready on both sides of the ocean to create the "Sugar" connection.
---------

s Anti-Semitic feelings reached their climax in the late 15th century, the Conversos soon became the β€œMarranos” meaning swine. The office of the Inquisition had once again been resurrected in 1480, again placing the Jews in a constant light of suspicion. By August of 1492 millions of Jews would suffer the racial cleansing practiced by the angry rulers of Spain. King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella ordered the Jews to convert or face expulsion; many were burned alive. Many others fled by way of Portugal to more hospitable lands in both the Old World and the New.

Jamaica was first reached by Christopher Columbus, a man of ambiguous origins. Some claim he was Italian, some, a Basque, and others assert that he was a Marrano Jew. Columbus had contracted the right to governorship of all lands he claimed for Spain in the New World, and the laws of the Inquisition were not included in his territories. Unfortunately disputes with the crown arose, challenging the terms of his proprietorship; restrictions were also created to help the Spanish and Portuguese control the migration of the Jews to the west. Jamaica was eventually acquired by Columbus’s son, and then subsequently passed on to his granddaughter who would marry into the house of Braganza and unify the island with the rest of the Portuguese colonies. This brought about the first migration of Jewish Sephardim to the island, coming from Portugal around 1530. [1]

Jamaica passed into the hands of the Spanish when the Iberian crowns were unified, but in 1655 the English gained control of the island. A Marrano named Acosta was the chief negotiator in the surrender. [2] Jamaica had always been more of a strategic location rather than an economic prospect in the eyes of the Spanish. The British had already learned how lucrative the plantations could be, through their trials in earlier colonies. Oliver Cromwell received Simon de Caceres, an openly practicing Jew, as his West Indian advisor. [3] De Caceres had earlier been in exile in Amsterdam, awaiting the changes that the British Civil War would bring about. In late 1660 the Sephardim petitioned for the right to remain in Jamaica, and the British permitted them willingly, thinking of them as good for establishing business and trade. The presence and tolerance of the colonial British government brought Jamaica’s first wave of Ashkenazi Jews from England and Germany in 1663, along with more Portuguese Sephardim from the recently fallen Dutch colonies. [4] By 1665 the Jews were greatly involved in commerce, and had nearly monopolized the vanilla industry. The success of the industrious Sephardic community created a disturbance among the wealthy, white elite of Jamaica. The Jews would then face a period of economic oppression that would last until 1826.

By the turn of the 18th century, sources indicate that there were nearly 80 heads of Jewish households, among a population of 7,000 whites. [5] The Sephardim had openly established cemeteries and synagogues in the Port Royal area upon the British arrival, and by this time the different customs had combined into a new β€œJewmaican” culture. The big businessmen of the Island began their campaign against the Jews by trying to pass a β€œwholesale only” restriction upon Jewish commerce, thus restricting them from participating in retail transactions. By 1700 the Jewish population bore an amazing tax load. Still, through their persistence, Jews flourished as shopkeepers, traders, mariners, and slave traders. Research of property records show that few Jews actually had plantations. [6] The Jews had a stake in the slave auctioning system, because it was trade oriented in nature. They managed to gain considerable control of the import industries through networking with other Marrano and Sephardic Jews in the Carribean; consequently, they all lived in Port Royal on the southern side of the island where heavy trade and commerce flourished. The great earthquake of 1692 sent the Sephardim to next-door Kingston after their synagogue was destroyed.

The Sephardim formed the congregation of Kol Kadosh Shahar Hashamayim in 1693, and managed to purchase large areas of property in Kingston’s newly forming commercial district. In 1744 the Spanish and Portuguese Jewish community would consecrate a two-story synagogue which embodied the new Jewmaican culture that had arisen. They decorated it with colorful eastern style rugs, Jamaican woodwork and six large silver candelabra. They also practiced a Sephardic custom of strewing sand all over the floor in remembrance of the Tabernacle. By 1730, Jews composed nearly 20 percent of Kingston’s white population. [7] The Ashkenazi community later created their own congregation in 1789.

Through out the 18th century, Jews were disproportionately taxed, were not allowed to participate in government, and did not enjoy the rights of legal citizens. The heavy disabilities were accompanied by suspicion. Many accused Jews of transacting with the Maroons, and it was also rumored that they bought stolen goods from the slaves in exchange for certain contraband items. At the turn of the 19th century the sugar market in Jamaica became destabilized, and the Haitian revolution had spread public fear of slave revolt. The Jamaican government found that it was in their best interest to propagate a relationship with the Jewish community. The early 1800’s brought about more recognition and religious freedom for the Sephardim of Kingston. In 1826, after several civil rights related cases, the discriminatory taxes were lifted, followed by full citizen rights in 1831, 27 years before the English. The Jamaican parliament presented a silver tankard to Moses Delgado, in a public display of acceptance. Delgado was an intelligent businessman, a leader in the Sephardic community, and a generous friend of the governorship. [8] The Jews quickly involved themselves in the Jamaican government. By 1849 they held 8 of 49 seats in the Parliament.

---------

Also settlement of Irish in Barbadoes as laborers to help pay off Cromwell's debts to Dutch Jews.

 

Flaps McKinley

Do you even dilate, bro?
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
Another book recommendation: The Jews of Britain: A Thousand Years of History, by Pamela Fletcher Jones (The Windrush Press, Glos, 1990). A good readable overview of Jewish history in Britain, with potentially even the odd unknown fact for even the in-depth scholar. Here are some of the pictures from the book. Not gonna lie, I like a book with pictures, and this book has plenty of pictures, being illustrated throughout. It can be picked up very cheaply online - I bought my copy for literal pennies (which in a Scottish brain, releases chemicals similar to a physical orgasm).

A notable remark that can be made about the fourth picture - it reminds us of the fact that in two cases in Europe, there was widespread mob violence against the Jews a hundred years before they were finally expelled from the country - in England, in 1190, there were spontaneous outbreaaks (expulsion came exactly 100 years later, in 1290), and in Spain there was widespread anti-Semitic violence in 1391, the expulsion itself famously coming 101 years later. (The German situation doesn't quite match this model, if we take the Hep-Hep riots of 1819 as the first flash point on the road to 1933, but still there might be something in this theory.)

IMG_1490.JPGIMG_2480.JPGIMG_5810.JPGIMG_8162.JPGIMG_9101.JPG
 
Last edited:

Flaps McKinley

Do you even dilate, bro?
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»

Flaps McKinley

Do you even dilate, bro?
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
1659693702666.png


@JR_Rustler_III - I don't know if you remember a while back, I was talking about Jews bringing in a large number of their brethren illegally during hte 20th century, and you wanted more evidence of that... well, I came across this again today, and between that and a chapter in the unabridged version of Henry Ford's book, (I think it's chapter 21, How The Jews Conceal Their Strength) which shows how the mass immigration of Jews had become a highly organised, industrial-scale operation among the Jews themselves, I think this is where I got the idea that this is why Jews freak out when people like Trump talk about removing illegals from America. Half of them had grandparents who were illegals in America... and they know it.
 

JR_Rustler_III

πŸ‡°πŸ‡· Gookwaffen πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ– πŸ’»πŸ₯©
Destructive Ceremonious Master
The oligarchs who ran England had little interest in controlling the situation (this would cost money, and would go against their laissez-faire ideology of minimal government)
Were they really that ideological, though? The more obvious explanation is they personally benefited so much by having Jews around that they were willing to overlook whatever problems they caused.
 

Flaps McKinley

Do you even dilate, bro?
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
Were they really that ideological, though? The more obvious explanation is they personally benefited so much by having Jews around that they were willing to overlook whatever problems they caused.
In the case of the later immigration under discussion, the Jews did not benefit them economically at all - it was the poor and criminal elements, primarily the betteljuden, flooding into England - the "cream" of both Sephardi and Ashkenazi Jewry already had their place in the financial system by that point, and the elites could have easily put controls in place to stop further immigration. But "laissez-faire" was very much the ideology of the day. (Indeed, the Jews' attempt to control the people coming in came to nothing, as the gentile elites did not want to hand over power to another group.)

I really recommend this book, by the way. As Garfisch says, you can find it online for free.
 

JR_Rustler_III

πŸ‡°πŸ‡· Gookwaffen πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ– πŸ’»πŸ₯©
Destructive Ceremonious Master
But "laissez-faire" was very much the ideology of the day. (Indeed, the Jews' attempt to control the people coming in came to nothing, as the gentile elites did not want to hand over power to another group.)
I guess. It just seems more likely that the rich Jews convinced their oligarch pals to overlook the problems caused by the poor Jews. Probably it was as easy as just giving them more money. Then the oligarchs justified their actions with "muh laissez faire". I mean, that's basically how oligarchs work today: First, figure out what means will bring you the most money and power, and then find some ideology that helps justify the means that lead to the desired outcomes. Since the Jews are really good at manufacturing ideologies, the obvious explanation is they were the ones that suggested "muh laissez faire" in the first place.

@Coltraine back me up, am I on the right track here? Or not?
 

Flaps McKinley

Do you even dilate, bro?
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
I guess. It just seems more likely that the rich Jews convinced their oligarch pals to overlook the problems caused by the poor Jews. Probably it was as easy as just giving them more money. Then the oligarchs justified their actions with "muh laissez faire". I mean, that's basically how oligarchs work today: First, figure out what means will bring you the most money and power, and then find some ideology that helps justify the means that lead to the desired outcomes. Since the Jews are really good at manufacturing ideologies, the obvious explanation is they were the ones that suggested "muh laissez faire" in the first place.
Oh, they did later on, at the turn of the twentieth century, when the Russian-Jew immigration had started from the 1880s onwards and had become an avalanche by 1900. At that point they controlled the newspapers and interfered with the Aliens Act of 1905 to make sure that the new limits on immigration did not effect anyone "escaping persecution", thus rendering the much-vaunted Aliens Act toothless in fact (though this will not be what was sold in the newspapers). But I'm talking about the period before that, when the people coming in were mostly of the German Ashkenazi variety. When the Russian pogroms happened, then the tone among British Jewry changed from "we need to be careful not to have too many of our poorest brethren in, lest we undo the gains we have made through decades, sometimes centuries of assimiliation", to "let them in, every last one". It was the Russian pogroms (with the attendant atrocity propaganda, published in serialisations in the Jewish Chronicle) that caused this change in attitude, and you're right, at this point the Jewish elite were steering events.

NB: About the Jews controlling the newspapers (through threats of advertising boycotts, as they controlled the advertising which made or broke newspapers), see Joseph Bannister's England Under the Jews, first published in 1903, which gives a first-hand account of this Russian-wave of Jewry into England, displacing the natives who were forced to try their luck in the New World. The way the author talks about his book being mailed to people (almost in brown paper) also evinces the control that the Jews had in England by that point, and the fear that people had of them.
 
Last edited:

CrackSmokeRepublican

N***a you better not be charging me Hennessy rate
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
Escaped True Master
Keep in mind the endless, "Who was he?", drama around "Jack the Ripper". Yes he was a Russian imported Jew that Scotland Yard covered up to keep the English people "non-Anti-Semitic back" then -- preserve the peace. Recently a couple of J-Tards got defensive when more and more evidence was piling up that it was an insane Schizophrenic Jew (Aaron Kosminiski). Articles from the various J-Triber publications try to "debunk" that Jack the Ripper was a Jew...if you really look at it objectively...JTR was a recent Russian-Polish Jew. The DNA evidence is against some random "goy" doing this. Article below is one of many in J-Tribe op-eds on "Jack the Ripper was Jewish" -- yes he was, he was a typical ugly imported Jew in England. Like crazy "mafia" Jews in the USA...Jews will try to always distract from real J-Tard crimes. Same idiot Jews talking around some Palestinian village getting blown up by advanced weapons:

https://www.sdjewishworld .com/2022/05/10/jews-and-jack-the-ripper/

https://www.algemeiner .com/2020/01/23/debunking-the-myth-of-a-jewish-jack-the-ripper/

Debunking the Myth of a Jewish β€˜Jack the Ripper’
by Harold Brackman
A London bus outside the Houses of Parliament. Photo: public domain.
In 1887, London celebrated Queen Victoria’s 50th Jubilee. In 1888, the impoverished East End β€” home to as many as 100,000 Jews β€” exploded in β€œthe Autumn of Terror,” personified by England’s first famous serial killer, Jack the Ripper.
The lengthy list of alleged Ripper suspects ranges from a member of the royal family to Polish-Jewish immigrant and barber Aaron Kosminski. Arthur Conan Doyle, the inventor of Sherlock Holmes, reportedly suspected a woman could have been responsible. (J-Tard notage here...--CSR)

The most prominent Jewish suspect, Kosminski, stabbed a woman, probably his sister, and was admitted to a lunatic asylum in 1891, three years after the murder of the Ripper’s fifth victim. One problem is that police officials who fingered him as a β€œprime suspect” were prejudiced against Jews.

In 2014, London businessman Russell Edwards teamed with Scandinavian forensic analyst Dr. Jari Louhelainen for a comparison of Kosminski’s DNA with mitochondrial evidence from semen stains on the shawl of Catherine Eddowes, the Ripper’s second victim. Their conclusion: over a 99% likelihood that Kosminski was Jack the Ripper.


August 5, 2022 2:18 pm

JNS.org – It was recently announced that Israel and Lebanon have made significant progress in negotiations over gas drilling in...
But the DNA analysis was flawed. Undaunted, Louhelainen authored a recent article in the Journal of Forensic Sciences reviving his theory. Serious doubts persist.

Australian popular historian Stephen Senise, in False Flag: Jack the Ripper (2019), argues that a Jew was not the Ripper. Senise is in a long line of β€œripperologists” to note connections between the Ripper hysteria and anti-immigrant, antisemitic passions in the East End, where mobs attacked Orthodox Jews.

Yet Senise is the first to offer a painstaking analysis linking antisemitic intent with specific crime scenes. None of the prostitutes killed was Jewish, but one was murdered in the courtyard of London’s Jewish radical club, and another’s body was deposited behind the Great Synagogue. Also, a nearby wall was scrawled with a cryptic message suggesting that the β€œJuwes” did it.
Senise’s greatest contribution may be to connect sensational accounts in London newspapers of Hungary’s Tisza-Eszlar and Ritter ritual murder trials, in which Jews were wrongly accused of murdering women, with the timing of the East End crimes and even the modus operandi of the Ripper’s mutilation murders.

His theory is that the East End murders were plotted to convince credulous Londoners that Jack the Ripper was Jewish. Remember that readers of Bram Stoker’s Dracula (1895) often believed that it was a parable about Jewish bloodlust.
Senise’s prime suspect is George Hutchinson, a non-Jewish common laborer who gave detailed but conflicting accounts of his sighting of the Ripper, replete with antisemitic innuendo, perhaps to deflect suspicion from himself. Hutchinson departed for New South Wales in 1888, soon after the last of the five generally-accepted Ripper murders.
Though lacking conclusive evidence, Senise makes an intriguing case for a non-Jewish, antisemitic hand behind the Ripper’s horrific crimes.

Before dismissing Senise’s theory, think of ritual murder accusations a century and more ago, picturing the stereotyped β€œJew” as an archetypal serial killer. Consider also Charles Manson, who masterminded a mass murder spree in Los Angeles in 1969 to incite a race war. Did Manson and the Ripper both seek to ignite race-based attacks, albeit against different scapegoats?
Historian Harold Brackman is coauthor with Ephraim Isaac of From Abraham to Obama: A History of Jews, Africans, and African Americans (Africa World Press, 2015).
 
Last edited:

Flaps McKinley

Do you even dilate, bro?
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
Keep in mind the endless, "Who was he?", drama around "Jack the Ripper". Yes he was a Russian imported Jew that Scotland Yard covered up to keep the English people "non-Anti-Semitic back" then -- preserve the peace. Recently a couple of J-Tards got defensive when more and more evidence was piling up that it was an insane Schizophrenic Jew (Aaron Kosminiski). Articles from the various J-Triber publications try to "debunk" that Jack the Ripper was a Jew...if you really look at it objectively...JTR was a recent Russian-Polish Jew. The DNA evidence is against some random "goy" doing this. Article below is one of many in J-Tribe op-eds on "Jack the Ripper was Jewish" -- yes he was, he was a typical ugly imported Jew in England. Like crazy "mafia" Jews in the USA...Jews will try to always distract from real J-Tard crimes. Same idiot Jews talking around some Palestinian village getting blown up by advanced weapons:
Well, somebody's doing the eviscerating.

It's like when the Jews screech about blood libel, but ignore the fact that there's still a exsanguinate child's body with ritual puncture marks that needs to be accounted for. Or is that just chopped liver?
 

Flaps McKinley

Do you even dilate, bro?
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
Just for general interest, I was reading a redpilled Argentinian book on the Spanish Inquisition, and in one of the end-notes it mentions that a popular 19th-century English encyclopedia-almanac used to mention Jewish ritual murder in England up until their edition of 1847, at which point all future editions did not contain the information. So I checked it out. The encyclopedia in question, Haydn's dictionary of dates and universal information relating to all ages and nations, did indeed list the Jewish ritual murders chronologically, as can be seen below (image taken from the 1845 edition):

Haydn3.png

However, these murders are still listed in the 1866 edition (albeit the Northampton one is no longer there, although I notice an 1866 addition - that in 1723, a law was passed permitting Jews to own land in England). However, by the 1870 edition, the history is completely cleaned up, with Jewish ritual murders being completely expunged. No murders can be seen, but the poysecutions against the Jews are still listed. I post this because it helps to demonstrate the "inflection point" (as @Coltraine described it) in Jewish power in Britain, and their power to control information about their crimes.

(this may also be of particular interest to @Garfisch @Habakkuk and @JR_Rustler_III )

link to the full source https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/_/0xoEAAAAQAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1

I should add that this JRM list, though much to be commended in a book for general reading, is not complete. He is the complete list (as far as is currently known) for England:

1144 Norwich (William of Norwich)
1160 Gloucester
1181 Bury St Edmunds
1192 Winchester
1232 Winchester
1235 Norwich
1244 London
1255 Lincoln (Hugh of Lincoln)
1257 London
1279 Northampton
1290 Oxford
 
Last edited:
Top