Garfisch
Right-Wing Normalist. HOAX WORLD navigator.
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖 💻🥩
Destructive Ceremonious Master
@Flaps McKinley Ayo nigga!
CharlesWorthing
Unsolicited advice giver
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
@Flaps McKinley
You mention Henry VIII's land grab, given over to his supporters, taken from the Catholic Church land and the land of Catholic families. Has anyone traced the beneficiary families down to the present to see how they fit into the current elite?
The British Royal family is a puzzle to me. They have an absurdly high profile in the media and public life in general. Partly it can be accounted for by people scrambling for honors, sirs, lords, etc. But they have all sorts of connections. Prince Charles and Prince Philip attended a few Bilderberg meetings.
You mention Henry VIII's land grab, given over to his supporters, taken from the Catholic Church land and the land of Catholic families. Has anyone traced the beneficiary families down to the present to see how they fit into the current elite?
The British Royal family is a puzzle to me. They have an absurdly high profile in the media and public life in general. Partly it can be accounted for by people scrambling for honors, sirs, lords, etc. But they have all sorts of connections. Prince Charles and Prince Philip attended a few Bilderberg meetings.
>You mention Henry VIII's land grab, given over to his supporters, taken from the Catholic Church land and the land of Catholic families. Has anyone traced the beneficiary families down to the present to see how they fit into the current elite?
That's the million-dollar question, and to my knowledge no one has. It would take a hell of a lot of research for a tome which would be likely to attract no interest from a publisher, but lots of interest from the intelligence services. It's not impossible to research however, not least because Cobbett published a follow-up volume called "List of Abbeys, Priories, Nunneries, Hospitals and other Religious Foundations in England and Wales and in Ireland, Confiscated, Seized on, Or Alienated, by the Protestant "Reformation" Sovereigns and Parliaments", which details to the pound the sums of the buildings taken by the elites, though he says himself the totality of the lands is impossible to calculate, with it being up to a third of the total land mass of the country. The book is available on archive.org and google books, and comes with an introduction of his which is typically BASED, and which rings particularly relevant for us today, because it discusses the beginnings of the talk of Malthusian "population control", which commenced when the population was thrown off the land, and the elites decided that a cull of population was required (and from the 16th century onwards they began to talk of "natural law" in "survival of the fittest" or "might makes right" terms which long predated Darwin - and Cobbett discusses this elite mindset here in this book, in 1829). Equally relevant for our current year, he also talks about how disenfranchising the masses of their birthright by means of seizing all economic power would mean that the elites' subsequent political power would be diminished - that is to say - that peasants who had had everything stolen from them would have no stake in defending the land or fighting for the current order, and indeed, that is what we see today, with the rulers very aware that the native peoples of Britain and Europe (and the Anglo diaspora) have been denuded of any will to fight for the regimes of their respective countries, given that the regimes in question have done nothing but openly demonstrate their contempt for them for well over a lifetime.
All of that said, one aristocratic family which did stick out for me was the bloodline which began with Lord John Russell, 1st Earl of Bedford, who was a huge beneficiary of the dissolution of the monasteries. This guy was mentioned in Cobbett's History for bringing in German troops to quell the native uprisings against the land grab, and his descendants continued to persecute Catholics in Britain through the ages, because this family understood the existential risk that a restoration of Catholicism would bring to their status and fortune - which had been made on the back of the destruction of the Church and the stealing of the land and property. They were politically Whigs - those who supported the setting up of the Bank of England (the debt-based system), and Lord John Russell, the 19th century foreign secretary, was instrumental in trying to set up liberal regimes - and diminishing Catholic political power (which would oppose the money-system) - in countries around the world where the UK could use debt as a means of control e.g. Mexico. Then there's Lord Bertrand Russell, the famous NWO insider of the 20th century, globalist and exponent of scientism, who wrote many books including "Why I am not a Christian", and others of a very shady variety which outline plans similar to those of Huxley and Gates for controlling and culling the peasants. He was also a key player in the Tavistock Institute. Jay Dyer had reviewed his books extensively, but in none of the episodes I've seen of his, has he linked back Russell's family origins to the land-grab of the Reformation, which would give the original reasoning for so much of his family's hostility to Christianity and tradition, and to the common people. Garfisch will probably be able to tell you more about the origins of the name Russell, which is likely Rousel, of French origin, and it may have been that the Russells were of Sephardic Jewish blood originally (but I don't know this for certain).
What I would say with more certainty is that as time went on, the land stolen from the church fell more and more into Jewish hands by the 19th century, either by means of mortgage debt or bankruptcy, or by marriage, as more and more wealthy Jews married into the aristocracy, thus marrying money with status. As a result many British aristos may not look or profess to be Jewish, but they do in fact possess Jewish blood to a greater or lesser degree, and have the instincts that align with this configuration (a defence tactic that the Jews similarly employed in medieval Spain, in order to make sure that when there was a threat of peasant violence against the Jews, the aristos would be find the Jews' problem was now their own). I know that Andrew Joyce has done work on this over at the Occidental Observer.
>The British Royal family is a puzzle to me. They have an absurdly high profile in the media and public life in general. Partly it can be accounted for by people scrambling for honors, sirs, lords, etc. But they have all sorts of connections. Prince Charles and Prince Philip attended a few Bilderberg meetings.
As for the royal family, I don't know that much about them, except for the fact that their true power is difficult to ascertain. Certainly, if their position were truly attractive, the most eligible blue-blooded noblewomen of Europe would have been queuing up to marry the princes... and as it was, we saw a sharp-elbowed middle-class Sloanie crypto-Jew (mother is Goldsmith) get the top spot, and a literal triple-roasted mulatto hooker get the younger brother. That would suggest to me that the real powerbrokers in Europe understand that for what is coming, it is better not to be in the limelight, lest you end up like the Romanovs, but better to be someone unknown to the peasant masses, who can slip away unscathed in times of unrest. Perhaps unwittingly, Lady Colin Campbell said something very pertinent, when she pointed out that "just call me Harry" and his flirtations with marxist demagoguery with his wife, is very similar to the Duc D'Orléans' machinations during the French Revolution, when, like Harry, he denigrated the monarch, and called himself "Philippe Egalité" in a bid to make himself popular with the peasants, in the hope that, were they to topple the King, they would install him, "Philippe", in his place. As it was, the Revolution saw Philippe beheaded alongside his cousin. Seeing Harry's antics makes one wonder if the royal elites don't smell the coming blood in the air, and some are trying to position themselves to try to ride the tiger. I believe that the royal family themselves understand that they sit atop dark powers as convenient figureheads, to give the natives a sense of security and continuity, but that they could be easily replaced - I'm sure it was David Icke who talked about a newspaper report of Camilla Parker-Bowles having her car spin out of control and hitting a tree, and saying that when she got out of the car, she just "ran and ran" (the implication being that she assumed that her car had been tampered with, and that she feared she was the target of a hit). I would imagine that, like Diana being bugged, she would be correct to be paranoid.
Hope my ramblings help to answer your questions LOL.
That's the million-dollar question, and to my knowledge no one has. It would take a hell of a lot of research for a tome which would be likely to attract no interest from a publisher, but lots of interest from the intelligence services. It's not impossible to research however, not least because Cobbett published a follow-up volume called "List of Abbeys, Priories, Nunneries, Hospitals and other Religious Foundations in England and Wales and in Ireland, Confiscated, Seized on, Or Alienated, by the Protestant "Reformation" Sovereigns and Parliaments", which details to the pound the sums of the buildings taken by the elites, though he says himself the totality of the lands is impossible to calculate, with it being up to a third of the total land mass of the country. The book is available on archive.org and google books, and comes with an introduction of his which is typically BASED, and which rings particularly relevant for us today, because it discusses the beginnings of the talk of Malthusian "population control", which commenced when the population was thrown off the land, and the elites decided that a cull of population was required (and from the 16th century onwards they began to talk of "natural law" in "survival of the fittest" or "might makes right" terms which long predated Darwin - and Cobbett discusses this elite mindset here in this book, in 1829). Equally relevant for our current year, he also talks about how disenfranchising the masses of their birthright by means of seizing all economic power would mean that the elites' subsequent political power would be diminished - that is to say - that peasants who had had everything stolen from them would have no stake in defending the land or fighting for the current order, and indeed, that is what we see today, with the rulers very aware that the native peoples of Britain and Europe (and the Anglo diaspora) have been denuded of any will to fight for the regimes of their respective countries, given that the regimes in question have done nothing but openly demonstrate their contempt for them for well over a lifetime.
All of that said, one aristocratic family which did stick out for me was the bloodline which began with Lord John Russell, 1st Earl of Bedford, who was a huge beneficiary of the dissolution of the monasteries. This guy was mentioned in Cobbett's History for bringing in German troops to quell the native uprisings against the land grab, and his descendants continued to persecute Catholics in Britain through the ages, because this family understood the existential risk that a restoration of Catholicism would bring to their status and fortune - which had been made on the back of the destruction of the Church and the stealing of the land and property. They were politically Whigs - those who supported the setting up of the Bank of England (the debt-based system), and Lord John Russell, the 19th century foreign secretary, was instrumental in trying to set up liberal regimes - and diminishing Catholic political power (which would oppose the money-system) - in countries around the world where the UK could use debt as a means of control e.g. Mexico. Then there's Lord Bertrand Russell, the famous NWO insider of the 20th century, globalist and exponent of scientism, who wrote many books including "Why I am not a Christian", and others of a very shady variety which outline plans similar to those of Huxley and Gates for controlling and culling the peasants. He was also a key player in the Tavistock Institute. Jay Dyer had reviewed his books extensively, but in none of the episodes I've seen of his, has he linked back Russell's family origins to the land-grab of the Reformation, which would give the original reasoning for so much of his family's hostility to Christianity and tradition, and to the common people. Garfisch will probably be able to tell you more about the origins of the name Russell, which is likely Rousel, of French origin, and it may have been that the Russells were of Sephardic Jewish blood originally (but I don't know this for certain).
What I would say with more certainty is that as time went on, the land stolen from the church fell more and more into Jewish hands by the 19th century, either by means of mortgage debt or bankruptcy, or by marriage, as more and more wealthy Jews married into the aristocracy, thus marrying money with status. As a result many British aristos may not look or profess to be Jewish, but they do in fact possess Jewish blood to a greater or lesser degree, and have the instincts that align with this configuration (a defence tactic that the Jews similarly employed in medieval Spain, in order to make sure that when there was a threat of peasant violence against the Jews, the aristos would be find the Jews' problem was now their own). I know that Andrew Joyce has done work on this over at the Occidental Observer.
>The British Royal family is a puzzle to me. They have an absurdly high profile in the media and public life in general. Partly it can be accounted for by people scrambling for honors, sirs, lords, etc. But they have all sorts of connections. Prince Charles and Prince Philip attended a few Bilderberg meetings.
As for the royal family, I don't know that much about them, except for the fact that their true power is difficult to ascertain. Certainly, if their position were truly attractive, the most eligible blue-blooded noblewomen of Europe would have been queuing up to marry the princes... and as it was, we saw a sharp-elbowed middle-class Sloanie crypto-Jew (mother is Goldsmith) get the top spot, and a literal triple-roasted mulatto hooker get the younger brother. That would suggest to me that the real powerbrokers in Europe understand that for what is coming, it is better not to be in the limelight, lest you end up like the Romanovs, but better to be someone unknown to the peasant masses, who can slip away unscathed in times of unrest. Perhaps unwittingly, Lady Colin Campbell said something very pertinent, when she pointed out that "just call me Harry" and his flirtations with marxist demagoguery with his wife, is very similar to the Duc D'Orléans' machinations during the French Revolution, when, like Harry, he denigrated the monarch, and called himself "Philippe Egalité" in a bid to make himself popular with the peasants, in the hope that, were they to topple the King, they would install him, "Philippe", in his place. As it was, the Revolution saw Philippe beheaded alongside his cousin. Seeing Harry's antics makes one wonder if the royal elites don't smell the coming blood in the air, and some are trying to position themselves to try to ride the tiger. I believe that the royal family themselves understand that they sit atop dark powers as convenient figureheads, to give the natives a sense of security and continuity, but that they could be easily replaced - I'm sure it was David Icke who talked about a newspaper report of Camilla Parker-Bowles having her car spin out of control and hitting a tree, and saying that when she got out of the car, she just "ran and ran" (the implication being that she assumed that her car had been tampered with, and that she feared she was the target of a hit). I would imagine that, like Diana being bugged, she would be correct to be paranoid.
Hope my ramblings help to answer your questions LOL.
Last edited:
Garfisch
Right-Wing Normalist. HOAX WORLD navigator.
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖 💻🥩
Destructive Ceremonious Master
Prince Charles was circumcised by the Chief Rabbi, of course.
Jews were retained in England and Ireland as the Laity of the Cistercian abbeys since the 12th century up until the Dissolution of the monasteries, after which they entered the Baronial class and interbred with the British monarchy, particularly after the 17th century...
What are the sources like regarding these claims? Is it just circumstantial evidence but not incontrovertible, because I've not seen anything to prove this myself, but then I haven't done a deep dive. I've read Robin Mundill, Bernard Glassman and Frank Felsenstein on the period concerned, and none say anything remotely to indicate this level of presence (or status).
Also, I forgot to mention, David Beckham has a snowball's chance of getting the knighthood he craves. The British Establishment gives out knighthoods to Jews, criminals, homosexuals and pedophiles (and as you can imagine, that's a hell of a Venn diagram), but it'll draw the line at neck tattoos.
I've read one of Tawney's other books (about James I) once upon a time and I have had the book you mention on my combination "to buy/to read" list for quite a while too. Although I just noticed looking around on Amazon that there now exists an audio version that Amazon's offering me for free at the moment, so I'll be sure to take advantage of that present. I think Amazon offers me these free trials so often because I already buy (and sell) so much stuff anyway through their website, because I don't remember ever explicitly signing up for some free audio trial or anything, lol. I'll also check out your link here in a minute.
I've not actually read Cobbett's book, but I'm familiar enough with it since EMJ references it and uses it as a resource in his books during much of the Reformation period in England, which incidentally I've been on a kick recently of deep-diving mainly into Stuart post-Restoration history when and as it relates to both Jews and Freemasonry- that whole Stuart-Freemason-Jewish nexus that apparently existed and was damn near hegemonic itself when it betrayed Cromwell when he couldn't make Jewish Re-admission to England happen fast enough in favor of bringing in Charles II to the throne- which in my opinion is best narrated and documented in EMJ's three chapters in JRS- 'John Dee and Magic', 'Menassah and the Apostate Messiah', and finally 'The Rise of Freemasonry'- the last chapter of which I wrote a little about here and here if you're interested. It's in my opinion the single most important chapter of them all in that book because it covers so much important ground historically and otherwise.
Also, good to see you posting here again as that was a surprise to see the other day. I haven't been so much around the last few days having a lot of family events and stuff to attend to recently, but I follow along the best I can. I was honored that Anglin posted that list above from me in the first place- although up until now I haven't really had the time to properly respond to this thread in the way that I would've liked to the day he originally posted it. Like I said elsewhere, the list was just based on a "best of JQ" list that I had made years ago and posted on the old bbs probably, but then I quickly added in some books both old and new that I've read myself over the past few years in order to update things accordingly. There's dozens of books I probably could've included on there or that I at least wanted to include on there that just couldn't fit in the end. Somebody above already mentioned a few that I removed in order to make room for others. But, I know you're never going to please absolutely everyone completely in one of these situations. I hope most people at least find some selection in there at least that appeals to them.
The best or most important addition in my opinion was Jonathan Israel's Revolutionary Jews from Spinoza to Marx, which just appeared last year and I devoured that thing within the first month or so of its release. It's essential reading in my thinking because it really centers Spinoza himself within the future worldviews and ideologies of revolutionary Jews like Moses Mendelsohn, Heinrich Heine, Moses Hess, and Karl Marx along with hundreds of others. They were all crypto-Spinozists if not even open admirers and propagators of Spinoza as the Jewish Messiah, who these revolutionaries rehabilitated within the European intellectual world during the 19th and early 20th Centuries. Many people do not know this, but Spinoza was discredited and almost forgotten by the time Jews like Mendelsohn, Junius Frey (aka Moses Dobruska)*, Ludwig Borne, Edward Gans, Hess, Heine, and Marx all began reinserting explicit Spinozan ideas right back into the intellectual and cultural zeitgeist of 19th Century Europe. And this rehab effect in Spinoza- this intellectual "ret-conning" if you will- can still be seen today in the world of academia and elsewhere wherein Spinoza is idealized and oft considered everything from the "First Modern Jew" to the "Creator of Modernity" itself even. So it's not so much that Spinoza himself was important while he lived, but mostly it's about how these Jews view Spinoza, how they still view Spinoza as their Messiah essentially, and how that underlies their entire revolutionary ethos still to this day in many ways that's important to understand.
* Junius Frey (aka Moses Dobruska) is the main ideological synthesis here between Spinozism and Frankism, a point built upon more in Israel's new book
Last edited:
@Coltraine
I recommend the Cobbett audiobook, because Cobbett can be quite bombastic and difficult to read on the page for modern readers (he loves his italics and block capitals), and in many ways he's quite repetitive - not least because he wrote the "book" as a series of letters addressed to the readers of his self-published newspaper, so he knew he had to remind readers of previous letters. I believe the audiobook is a reading of a later posthumous edition of History, which takes out the lolsy anti-semitic remarks and other elements which would be offensive to Victorian (and indeed 21st century) readers (Cobbett really was the Anglin of his time, and he loved making his readers laugh), but you'll lose none of the information for that - the changes are minimal.
You've actually reminded me that a great way to "digest" the massive literary bricks of E. Michael Jones is to listen to them. Anyone can do this by downloading his books as PDFs from Z-Library, then uploading the PDFs into naturalreaders.com (the online version is free, and you don't need to register), and listening to the automatic reader. It's not perfect (for example, it will mangle some words, and it reads out everything, including page numbers and chapter titles), but you can follow along the audio with the written text if you want, as it highlights each word sounded, and you can go back and relisten to bits you didn't quite catch. It's how I got through Barren Metal so easily, and it's how I came back to the Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and found I enjoyed it after having given up on my physical copy in 2016 at page 155 (note I still remember the page number - I feel my intellectual failures keenly). Part of the reason I gave up of the JRS was because it was frankly boring me - but when I used natural reader and re-started my reading at the chapters which actually interested me most (like Coltraine, these were the chapters of Early Modern England - the chapters spanning John Dee to Freemasonry), I flew through them, and couldn't believe I had let this book sit unread for so long. The natural reader option is particularly good if you want to "read" a book while doing something else because you're strapped for time, and want to skim the contents of a book to know what's in it, while still being able to do other stuff. It's highly recommended for time-strapped peeps like @Andrew Anglin - also, if you read one of these EMJ tomes right through, you'll find that they are also quite repetitive - it is like he has written each chapter as stand-alone articles, potentially for magazine serialisation, so what that means in practice is that you can pick out a chapter you like the look of, and read it knowing that you're not going to have to have read the previous chapters to fully understand it. This is another great way for busy people to get what they need from E. Michael Jones.
Notice, I'm a big fan of EMJ, but that doesn't mean I don't disagree with him on some things. He's an open Catholic ideologue, and all of his positions stem from that fact. But regardless of where I differ from his views, his historical research is game-changing and his analysis is so thought-provoking that nobody on the Right can afford to ignore him. His Sodomy and Usury thesis is the single easiest way to understand our enslavement in the modern world, and how Anglin has riffed on this thesis, eg. "World War Anus", "fighting for child anal rimjobs in the Ukraine", is frankly propagandistic genius.
I recommend the Cobbett audiobook, because Cobbett can be quite bombastic and difficult to read on the page for modern readers (he loves his italics and block capitals), and in many ways he's quite repetitive - not least because he wrote the "book" as a series of letters addressed to the readers of his self-published newspaper, so he knew he had to remind readers of previous letters. I believe the audiobook is a reading of a later posthumous edition of History, which takes out the lolsy anti-semitic remarks and other elements which would be offensive to Victorian (and indeed 21st century) readers (Cobbett really was the Anglin of his time, and he loved making his readers laugh), but you'll lose none of the information for that - the changes are minimal.
You've actually reminded me that a great way to "digest" the massive literary bricks of E. Michael Jones is to listen to them. Anyone can do this by downloading his books as PDFs from Z-Library, then uploading the PDFs into naturalreaders.com (the online version is free, and you don't need to register), and listening to the automatic reader. It's not perfect (for example, it will mangle some words, and it reads out everything, including page numbers and chapter titles), but you can follow along the audio with the written text if you want, as it highlights each word sounded, and you can go back and relisten to bits you didn't quite catch. It's how I got through Barren Metal so easily, and it's how I came back to the Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and found I enjoyed it after having given up on my physical copy in 2016 at page 155 (note I still remember the page number - I feel my intellectual failures keenly). Part of the reason I gave up of the JRS was because it was frankly boring me - but when I used natural reader and re-started my reading at the chapters which actually interested me most (like Coltraine, these were the chapters of Early Modern England - the chapters spanning John Dee to Freemasonry), I flew through them, and couldn't believe I had let this book sit unread for so long. The natural reader option is particularly good if you want to "read" a book while doing something else because you're strapped for time, and want to skim the contents of a book to know what's in it, while still being able to do other stuff. It's highly recommended for time-strapped peeps like @Andrew Anglin - also, if you read one of these EMJ tomes right through, you'll find that they are also quite repetitive - it is like he has written each chapter as stand-alone articles, potentially for magazine serialisation, so what that means in practice is that you can pick out a chapter you like the look of, and read it knowing that you're not going to have to have read the previous chapters to fully understand it. This is another great way for busy people to get what they need from E. Michael Jones.
Notice, I'm a big fan of EMJ, but that doesn't mean I don't disagree with him on some things. He's an open Catholic ideologue, and all of his positions stem from that fact. But regardless of where I differ from his views, his historical research is game-changing and his analysis is so thought-provoking that nobody on the Right can afford to ignore him. His Sodomy and Usury thesis is the single easiest way to understand our enslavement in the modern world, and how Anglin has riffed on this thesis, eg. "World War Anus", "fighting for child anal rimjobs in the Ukraine", is frankly propagandistic genius.
I have lost count of the number of times that I have gained knowledge and insight from reading @Coltraine 's comments/analysis on GU articles and posts. - often with referenced sources - thanks brother.
Last edited:
lol what the hell is z library? I have his books in hard text but I am interested in this method.
Also, I have said this before, but Coltraine is the goat poster on this board.
The third edition is great! I recommend that one and also own that version too.
Ditto
Z-Library. The world's largest ebook library.
Contains 10,688,000+ books and 84,837,000+ articles for free.
z-lib.org
Creepy-ass Cracker
Catholic • Pre-Vatican II • Sedevacantist
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
The works of Father Denis Fahey, C.S.Sp. (July 3, 1883 – January 21, 1954), especially:
- Secret Societies and the Kingship of Christ (1928)
- The Mystical Body of Christ in the Modern World (1935)
- The Rulers of Russia (1938)
- The Kingship of Christ and Organized Naturalism (1943)
- Money Manipulation and the Social Order (1944)
- The Mystical Body of Christ and the Reorganization of Society (1945)
- The Kingship of Christ and the Conversion of the Jewish Nation (1953)
JR_Rustler_III
🇰🇷 Gookwaffen 🇯🇵
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖 💻🥩
Destructive Ceremonious Master
As you probably already know, Pesch's works are central to E. Michael Jones' "Barren Metal".
The English translation of Pesch's magnum opus, Lehrbuch der Nationalökonomie ("Ethics and the National Economy") is, naturally, hard to find in print.
Library Genesis: Heinrich Pesch - Ethics and the National Economy
Library Genesis is a scientific community targeting collection of books on natural science disciplines and engineering.
www.libgen.is
Ethics and the National Economy | Heinrich Pesch | download
Ethics and the National Economy | Heinrich Pesch | download | Z-Library. Download books for free. Find books
usa1lib.org
The importance of this cannot be overstated
Last edited:
CharlesWorthing
Unsolicited advice giver
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
Of course, Jews married into the aristocracy all over Europe.
I was skimming through the WW2 German arrest list for the UK, which is a list of people they were going to pick up if they invaded. One of the random entries I looked at was married to a Princess.
Hitler's Black Book - information for Israel Richard Merton
Information from Hitler's Black Book for Israel Richard Merton
www.forces-war-records.co.uk
Jewish
Richard Merton Born 1 December 1881 in Frankfurt am Main ; died 6 January 1960 ) was a German industrialist , founder and politician.From November 1932 to March 1933 was Merton Reichstag deputy of the German peoples party. In 1936 the Nazis expelled him from public office because of his Jewish ancestry. In 1938 he was imprisoned in Buchenwald concentration camp and his property confiscated by the state. After release he managed to escape along with his wife, Princess Elizabeth of Sayn-Wittgenstein-Berleburg, to England. In 1948 he returned to Frankfurt.
If I hadn't stumbled on this random piece of information I'd have no idea that this Royal family had Jewish connections.
Princess Elisabeth Ferdinande von Sayn-Wittgenstein
Genealogy profile for Princess Elisabeth Ferdinande von Sayn-Wittgenstein
www.geni.com
I wonder to what extent the plan to take over the world was originally hatched by white elites and was taken over by Jews. Or perhaps these elites were crypto Jews. Or perhaps the Jews are just instruments of the elites and are for the chopping block when robot armies and central bank digital currencies and social credit control us all.
Last edited:
Freedom Monk
Truth and Liberty above all else!
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
Escaped True Master
I would like to add George Lincoln Rockwell's White Power to our list here in the comments as well. Good book that explains the jewish threat and the problems that it has created around it.
Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf - Complete Audio Book mp3
Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf - Complete Audio Book mp3 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
Adolf Hitler's 'Mein Kampf' (Complete Audio Book) English Translation by James Murphy This translation of the unexpurgated edition of Mein Kampf was first...
archive.org
English Translation by James Murphy
This translation of the unexpurgated edition of "Mein Kampf" was first published on March 21st, 1939 by HURST AND BLACKETT LTD.
Presented here for the purposes of independent research and public education.
The audio file is approx 20 hours in length, so downloading is recommended. Approx. 400 MBs
A download link is also included at the bottom for the complete E-book (PDF format)
Related website for further research: http://mk.christogenea.org/
Last edited:
Probably the most interesting for me is Eustace Mullins’ “Curse of Canaan“.
Mullins was the last disciple of Ezra Pound. Ezra’s other disciples all won Nobel prizes in literature: TS Eliot, Hemingway, Yeats.
Pound had asked Mullins to write a book about how the Jews infiltrated the American banking system to set up usury and put Americans in debt. The result was the masterpiece “Secrets of the Federal Reserve”.
However an even better book by Mullins was the Curse of Canaan because it documents how the Jews‘ birth in history was itself the cause of Evil. The Jews were descendants of the Canaanites, the most despised race in Biblical times and one that God tried to kill on numerous occasions eg with Joshua.
These Canaanites practiced child sacrifice and canibalism which explains Jews today. They changed their names in history to make people forget who they were. The book also touches on how the white race are the true Israelites. Which is why the Jews hate them.
Mullins was the last disciple of Ezra Pound. Ezra’s other disciples all won Nobel prizes in literature: TS Eliot, Hemingway, Yeats.
Pound had asked Mullins to write a book about how the Jews infiltrated the American banking system to set up usury and put Americans in debt. The result was the masterpiece “Secrets of the Federal Reserve”.
However an even better book by Mullins was the Curse of Canaan because it documents how the Jews‘ birth in history was itself the cause of Evil. The Jews were descendants of the Canaanites, the most despised race in Biblical times and one that God tried to kill on numerous occasions eg with Joshua.
These Canaanites practiced child sacrifice and canibalism which explains Jews today. They changed their names in history to make people forget who they were. The book also touches on how the white race are the true Israelites. Which is why the Jews hate them.
On the subject of to what extent the current British elite (aristocracy) are Jews, you might like this excerpt from Hilaire Belloc's The Jews (1922) (Position of the Jews in England, p.223):
And the Jew pointed to the English State as that one in which all that his nation required of the goyim was to be found. He here enjoyed a situation the like of which he could not hope to enjoy in any other country of the world. All antagonism to him had died down. He was admitted to every institution in the State, a prominent member of his nation became chief officer of the English Executive, marriages began to take place, wholesale, between what had once been the aristocratic territorial families of this country and the Jewish commercial fortunes.
After two generations of this, with the opening of the twentieth century, those of the great territorial English families in which there was no Jewish blood were the exception. In nearly all of them was the strain more or less marked, in some of them so strong that though the name was still an English name and the traditions those of a purely English lineage of the long past, the physique and the character had become wholly Jewish and the members of the family were taken for Jews whenever they travelled in countries where the gentry had not yet suffered or enjoyed this admixture.
I also second Coltraine's recommendation of Ariel Toaff's Blood Passover (available online as a PDF in various places). Not sometimes the easiest of reads, it nevertheless contains many "juicy morsels" such as the excerpt below.
Your quote below from Belloc in regard to England during Victorian times:
I also wrote about this intermarriage strategy of the Jews recently calling it Judaism 1.0 basically because it was the first strategy to hegemony used in Europe once Jews gained enough wealth and power to enter into political symbiosis with the Castilian, Aragonese, and Navarrese elite of Medieval times:
You could probably even make the argument that Jews used the Judaism 1.0, or intermarriage with elite, strategy even earlier on than Iberia when they were in Carolingian France from the 8th through 10th Centuries. For this example, there's definitely not nearly as much concrete evidence as the former examples in Iberia or England, but there is lots of little pieces that when taken together start to form a fairly distinct and consistent picture in my opinion. Most prominently there's the Arthur Zuckerman theory of a Jewish Princedom in Feudal France roughly from 768 to 900, and he wrote a whole book that spawned an entirely new niche historical genre that is worth reading about that theory, which suggests that the Jews were ennobled and intermarried with the Carolingian (lesser) nobility, and that once intermarried and ennobled the Jews were given their own French Zion as sovereign territory essentially. That small kingdom in Carolingian France was called Septimania, and it existed on what was the Narbonnese in southern France throughout earlier Visigothic, Merovingian, and Moslem times. Zuckerman's theory is disputed by other historians, of course, but if you go by the whole "where there's smoke, there's fire" analogy, then you have to at least account for the possibility that Jews controlled Septimania (or Narbonne) in France during these centuries after intermarrying and being ennobled by the Frankish King Pepin, who was Charlemagne's father. And I will just conclude by saying that even if Zuckerman and his theory is disproven eventually, that this still doesn't preclude the Jews of that era in France being very powerful and in political symbiosis still with the Carolingian elite, as mainstream history itself reveals. It just means that it wasn't nearly to the strong extent that Zuckerman and his school claims.
Reminds me and sounds uncannily similar to this quote below in regard to Spain in the 15th Century:
Quote above is from Norman Roth's paper on academia.edu if you're interested. He's one of the foremost Jewish historians available on Sephardism in Medieval and Early Modern Europe.
I also wrote about this intermarriage strategy of the Jews recently calling it Judaism 1.0 basically because it was the first strategy to hegemony used in Europe once Jews gained enough wealth and power to enter into political symbiosis with the Castilian, Aragonese, and Navarrese elite of Medieval times:
So yeah all of this is to finally say that Jews used their Judaism 1.0 strategy in Iberia before they used it later on in England during the 18th and 19th Centuries.
You could probably even make the argument that Jews used the Judaism 1.0, or intermarriage with elite, strategy even earlier on than Iberia when they were in Carolingian France from the 8th through 10th Centuries. For this example, there's definitely not nearly as much concrete evidence as the former examples in Iberia or England, but there is lots of little pieces that when taken together start to form a fairly distinct and consistent picture in my opinion. Most prominently there's the Arthur Zuckerman theory of a Jewish Princedom in Feudal France roughly from 768 to 900, and he wrote a whole book that spawned an entirely new niche historical genre that is worth reading about that theory, which suggests that the Jews were ennobled and intermarried with the Carolingian (lesser) nobility, and that once intermarried and ennobled the Jews were given their own French Zion as sovereign territory essentially. That small kingdom in Carolingian France was called Septimania, and it existed on what was the Narbonnese in southern France throughout earlier Visigothic, Merovingian, and Moslem times. Zuckerman's theory is disputed by other historians, of course, but if you go by the whole "where there's smoke, there's fire" analogy, then you have to at least account for the possibility that Jews controlled Septimania (or Narbonne) in France during these centuries after intermarrying and being ennobled by the Frankish King Pepin, who was Charlemagne's father. And I will just conclude by saying that even if Zuckerman and his theory is disproven eventually, that this still doesn't preclude the Jews of that era in France being very powerful and in political symbiosis still with the Carolingian elite, as mainstream history itself reveals. It just means that it wasn't nearly to the strong extent that Zuckerman and his school claims.
Last edited:
Yeah that book was the first I ever read IIRC in regard to Italian Jewry, which has many similarities with just the Sephardic diaspora in general throughout Europe. Toaff is a talented historian in his own right even on top of the infamous Blood Passover book above. I've since read some of his other works dealing mainly with different Italian Jewries throughout the Medieval world- one of them on the Jews in Assisi, Italy specifically as a subject of metahistory. He also writes a lot about Jews and their influence in and around the Mediterranean during the same late medieval period. For example he co-edited a 2-volume series of books on Jews and their connection(s) to Banking, Finance, and International Trade in the Mediterranean during the late medieval and early modern periods, and those texts are formidable and dense in their detail to this subject. So there's more to the man and researcher than just the Blood Passover book is what I'm saying, and that more is definitely worth checking out if you're like me and make it your business to learn about these subjects. What's funny is that Toaff was highly respected among Jews and all historians within his field prior to him writing the Blood Passover book, which got him in a lot of trouble as I'm sure you and many others here are familiar already.
Last edited:
I absolutely gotta read that book!
It's actually not that good IMHO. He's actually quite an innocent about the Jews in many ways, analysing their behaviour in good faith, not realising their sheer malevolence against the goyim. Obviously, it was what was needed for its time (exactly 100 years ago), and bear in mind he was trying to be politically sensitive - it was mainstream publisher and he was a famous person - but for someone who is already J-wise, you are not likely to learn much that is new. I'd much sooner recommend Henry Ford's The International Jew or Kevin Macdonald's Separation and Its Discontents (or Culture of Critique). I actually went through all my highlighted notes on the book to see if there was anything else worth posting, and tbh, that was it.
But I do believe that the publication of this book, as even-handed and friendly to Jews as it was, I believe put the Jews on notice that they needed to destroy Britain's ethnic homogeneity, because prior to WW2 the UK was, like Germany, on its way to confrontations with organised Jewry. Obviously, that process was disrupted by WW2, but prior to WW2, ordinary people were getting increasingly Jew-wise, and it was standard in the 1930s. Hence why, as soon as WW2 was over, British Jews worked hard to make sure that what had happened in Germany could never happen in Britain, and they set to work diversifying us, from 1948 onwards.
The chapter of Henry Ford (also coincidentally written in 1922) called "How the Jews Conceal Their Strength" was something I read yesterday while looking for a source for Jimmy Rustler, and I didn't find was I was looking for, but I REEEE'd like feck at the secret history it revealed, about how the Jews invaded the USA by the million - mobilising the entirety of Russian Jewry to move continents like a carefully orchestrated army mobilisation. I'm still REEEing tbh, because when you read what else Ford has to say about them working to destroying Christianity as soon as they arrived in great enough numbers - literally getting state laws changed in the 1910s - you realise that the poor nation of America never stood a chance.
Truly they are an evil force.
Here are some pictures from Frank Felsenstein's Anti-Semitic Stereotypes, for the edification and entertainment of the perusers of this educational forum. Sadly, others don't come out well in the photographs, or require a long explanation that eludes me right now.
Last edited: