Paganism is Atheism

Aryan Uprising

Current Thing Denier
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»

Benevolent Landlord

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
Not an argument. Plus going through a thread disliking every comment I made suggests you're a bit sad and obsessive. That, too, is not an argument, but since you've not offered one, I need not respond with one - just like your friend with the primate avatar.

I don't give people on here a 'dislike'. I'm not a 15-year-old high school student.
Yeah, disliking retarded posts as I read them is really obsessive. I read a bad take, I click dislike. Simple as.
 

Benevolent Landlord

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
Vedanta makes this oh so simple: There are three manifistations of God: 1. Krishna, The supreme personality of godhead, a person. 2. Param-atma, param (above) the soul -atma- living in allofus, innit. That bit of God being withus alltimes, within our heart, and nudging our conscience, if we have one, i.e. are notaniggerorjew. 3. Brahman, the all-pervading spiritual consciousness aka white lite.

Christ is literally son of Krishna, and His trinity can be mapped to the above.

Edit: PS Anglin has technically banned these interesting theological threadz.
This New Age melding of all religions has really broken a lot of brains. Christ has nothing to do with fake and gay Krishna.
 

Benevolent Landlord

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
Don't put yourself down. You're not simple, just a bit backward.
Was that really the best you could do? You were better off just not replying at all. Real wignat boomer hours in this thread.
 

Tom Rogers

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
Was that really the best you could do? You were better off just not replying at all. Real wignat boomer hours in this thread.
Honestly, even Anglin thinks you're quite intelligent. He told me yesterday after he'd finished slamming your gook wife.
 

Aryan Uprising

Current Thing Denier
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
This New Age melding of all religions has really broken a lot of brains. Christ has nothing to do with fake and gay Krishna.
Kristos has everything to do with connecting Krishna with Christianity. We may and should reject islam, Budaisism etc, but don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. Christianity has its roots in vaishnavism much more than Israeilism.
 

Eric Striker

Fund me at National-Justice.hymen
⏰
Wignats and pagan-atheists have already turned on Tolkien. Erik Striker has sent out the message that JRR Tolkien would be a liberal if he were alive today:

https://litter.catbox.moe/cidqre.mp3

Obviously, if this were actually true, then that would mean that Tolkien would agree with Erik Striker on every issue, so it makes no sense why Striker makes this claim as an attack on Tolkien. But, ya know, these people are psychotic so just let it go.
I never said that, I just said that if Tolkien were alive today, we would both be sitting on your mom's face.
 

Eric Striker

Fund me at National-Justice.hymen
⏰
Also, who gives a fuck. You are arguing a stupid point that no one gives a shit about anyway.
 

Little Shitpost Buddha

Hortler Dod :(
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
Vedanta makes this oh so simple: There are three manifistations of God: 1. Krishna, The supreme personality of godhead, a person. 2. Param-atma, param (above) the soul -atma- living in allofus, innit. That bit of God being withus alltimes, within our heart, and nudging our conscience, if we have one, i.e. are notaniggerorjew. 3. Brahman, the all-pervading spiritual consciousness aka white lite.

Christ is literally son of Krishna, and His trinity can be mapped to the above.

Edit: PS Anglin has technically banned these interesting theological threadz.
Vedanta is the biggest piece of pedantry ever invented, second only to Islam
 

SNESChampion

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“
Thanks, and that's precisely where I'm at: I'm trying to get to first principles, or the heart of the matter. "Christians" (aka Jews) are so quick to start lisping about the window dressing - Jesus and Crusaders and slaughtering niggaz and dragons and all this silly stuff. I'm simply pointing out that "window dressing" is the entirety of "Christianity" (aka Judaism). They worship the Jewish God (as in a Creator), and they state this explicitly, after you spend three hours tearing through their interior decorating patterns.

The source of the Hitler quote above is not reliable, but assuming he said it, he was right: we need to look forward, not back. Christianity isn't merely "moribound", it is explicitly vapid. There's nothing there (besides nice churches and stained glass windows, which I think we should keep).
shut up neckbeard
 

SNESChampion

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“
"Christianity" (aka Judaism)
Of all the "pagans" (atheists) cranky old cane-wacks at God and white non-atheists, I think calling Christians "Jews" is the saddest. The Jews hatred for Christianity is as obvious as the "pagans", and the "pagans" (atheists) literally copy all their talking points from their atheist overlords like Carl Sagan.

The "Jews promote Christianity" is as absurd as "Jews promote frugality" or "Jews promote large families" (which anti-Christian neo-Nazi Mike Enoch has argued, actually).



(The Gaia-worshiping New Age movement of the 1970s, which they pathetically try to ape, was also completely run by Jews.)

 

Tom Rogers

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
shut up neckbeard
You're on here 24/7, but you're calling other people 'neckbeard'?

You’re acting like some bitch with your britches in uproar because somebody else somewhere has a different opinion to yours. Well pardon us, you queen.
 

SNESChampion

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“
You're on here 24/7, but you're calling other people 'neckbeard'?

You’re acting like some bitch with your britches in uproar because somebody else somewhere has a different opinion to yours. Well pardon us, you queen.
you're tired old man. go back to sleep
 

Tom Rogers

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
you're tired old man. go back to sleep
Where I am is daytime. Where you are is night time. You're the one tapping away at a keyboard in the middle of the night, getting angry at random people for no reason.

My best guess is that you were converted to Christianity using the methods you are attempting now: bullying, threats, insults, foul language. It worked on you and, perhaps sub-consciously, you are following the same pattern in trying to persuade others, including me. There's also something about Americans in general, in that I've noticed that you are often very rude and insulting online. I think it's a cultural thing: you have been brought up in a society with large open spaces where you can treat somebody else badly and never see them again. In short, like a lot of your countrymen, you lack basic manners and if we were face-to-face, I'd knock you out stone cold.

None of which means you're wrong in what you say, so far as there is substance to what you say, but your methods of trying to reach me are proving not very effective. I'm unimpressed.
 

SNESChampion

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“
Where I am is daytime. Where you are is night time. You're the one tapping away at a keyboard in the middle of the night, getting angry at random people for no reason.

My best guess is that you were converted to Christianity using the methods you are attempting now: bullying, threats, insults, foul language. It worked on you and, perhaps sub-consciously, you are following the same pattern in trying to persuade others, including me. There's also something about Americans in general, in that I've noticed that you are often very rude and insulting online. I think it's a cultural thing: you have been brought up in a society with large open spaces where you can treat somebody else badly and never see them again. In short, you lack basic manners and if we were face-to-face, I'd knock you out stone cold.

None of which means you're wrong in what you say, so far as there is substance to what you say, but your methods of trying to reach me are proving not very effective. I'm unimpressed.


if your posts were fewer than 5,000 words you might not have as many Downvotes
 

Tom Rogers

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’


if your posts were fewer than 5,000 words you might not have as many Downvotes
The way you're behaving here is quite Jewy and feminine - in my opinion. But it's also typical of an internet-era white American male.

For all I know, you may be correct in the substance of what you say, but your ego is getting in the way. Like most Americans, you're too full of yourself and it's impossible for me to take you seriously or consider your arguments because you keep insulting me. What reaction do you expect from me? The British way of argument/debate is to say what you need to say. The American way seems to be to get your britches in uproar and throw insults around.

Back when men were men, insulting another man in the way you're doing here used to be considered a very, very serious thing. Words do have power. Certainly where I am from, the north of England, it would mean a fight, and certainly if we were face-to-face, you would now be laying on the floor, knocked out stone cold. I would not put up with - regardless of the legal consequences for me. Before society became so feminised, the police and courts would turn a blind eye.

Have you got anything else to say, while we're here, or are you off to bed now?
 

SNESChampion

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“
The way you're behaving here is quite Jewy and feminine - in my opinion. But it's also typical of an internet-era white American male.

For all I know, you may be correct in the substance of what you say, but your ego is getting in the way. Like most Americans, you're too full of yourself and it's impossible for me to take you seriously or consider your arguments because you keep insulting me. What reaction do you expect from me? The British way of argument/debate is to say what you need to say. The American way seems to be to get your britches in uproar and throw insults around.

Back when men were men, insulting another man in the way you're doing here used to be considered a very, very serious thing. Words do have power. Certainly where I am from, the north of England, it would mean a fight, and certainly if we were face-to-face, you would now be laying on the floor, knocked out stone cold. I would not put up with - regardless of the legal consequences for me. Before society became so feminised, the police and courts would turn a blind eye.

Have you got anything else to say, while we're here, or are you off to bed now?


haven't read your walltexts since I valiantly soldiered through the tortuous kike Hellscape of your first walltext
 

Mark

Well-known asshole. Don't mess with MarkieBoy!
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
Girls, please!
 

SNESChampion

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“
Girls, please!
It's critical because of how rabid the "pagan" (atheists) have become in the past year or two. On /pol/, they have become as big a force as the honest atheists were 10 years ago.

I've had many, many online discussions with these people. And the discussion is always the exact same. Literally 100% of the time.

"Pagan": You universalist Christcuck! Me Wolf-Warrior-Dragon-Thor-Killer!
Me: Who do you believe created the universe?
"Pagan": Nature.
Me: That's literally atheism.
"Pagan": No, it's PAGANISM!
Me: So then Paganism and atheism are just synonyms. Anyway, if "nature" created mankind and the universe, then why do you tell white people to pray to a deity you don't even really believe in? Doesn't that make you a dishonest scammer?
"Pagan": No! Thor is the mythological essence of our ancestors!
Me: What does that mean, precisely?
"Pagan": Aryan-something-Jungian-something-Mythological-something-reincarnation-something
Me: You just said that Thor was the "essence" of your ancestors, but then you said he's a "myth". Myths are make-believe and fake.
"Pagan": Yes! We've created these myths as the manifestation of the Aryan soul!
Me: So you're an atheist, but then you made up these stories because you think they make you sound cool.
"Pagan": KIKE ON A STICK! SAND DEMON! FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER! I AM EUPHORIC!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm not exaggerating when I tell you that that that's a distillation of at least a dozen different debates I've had with these people. They are all atheists, and they will all admit this after about ten posts of patient needling.

(There's a likely exception to "pagans" following this patter. I'd guess that "pagan" women (who are obviously illogical and incapable of analyzing things logistically) would have the shrewd womanly instinct to avoid logical debate in the first place. Cunningly, women would be smart enough to stick to the, "I'm spiritual, not religious" line to avoid getting spanked in a debate. But the blowhard "pagan" men are just too retarded to avoid getting their asses beat. They can't resist the urge to start declaring themselves Warrior-Wolf-Sons-of-Thor! or whatever. The men truly believe this impresses people.)


Anyway, I'm just saying that I think this is an important topic, and definitely it's one that has spread across 4Chan in the past year.
 
Top