On the Benefits of Dating an Older, Educated Woman

Andrew Anglin

๐Ÿ ๐ŸŽ€ ๐“‚๐’ถ๐“ˆ๐“‰๐‘’๐“‡ ๐’ธ๐’ฝ๐’พ๐‘’๐’ป ๐ŸŽ€ ๐Ÿ
Old World Underground
Damaged and bitter with a history of failed relationships. These feminist cunts online never admit that, they just harp on the man wanting to "manipulate and abuse" a young woman.
Literally, the appeal is that they're less "filthy" and emotionally ravaged. It is impossible for 95% of (white) women to have multiple sex partners and not develop psychological problems in proportion to the number of sex partners. It is equally impossible for a white woman in the modern era to do anything other than go out and sleep with a series of men.


This has nothing at all to do with men "taking advantage" or any of this other emotional manipulation horseshit. It's in fact exactly like someone who eats shit food and becomes fat. You don't claim that McDonald's is to blame for manipulating an innocent person - even though that would be much closer to a true statement, given that McDonald's has billion dollar Bernays ad campaigns whereas men do not run advertising campaigns.

Because all women will go on sex rampages, and 95% will develop serious psychological damage as a result, the ONLY measure that matters is age. Period. Even all of this stuff about a relationship with her father basically stopped being true when they started allowing women on the internet. None of them can resist, and they will basically all follow the same pattern of approximately 10-15 sex partners a year between the ages of 18 and 25. Before 18, they're in high school, so it is largely impossible to disguise the number, and most of them still - even in 2020 - are sensitive to whore-shaming and don't want it public how many men they're having sex with.

None of this is a complex mystery that needs solving. It is blatant and self explanatory and everyone reading this knows that what I am saying is true, including the women. Claiming that men of whatever age who prefer women with the lowest body count possible, and thus the lowest age possible, are somehow "predatory" is blatant emotional manipulation of men by women.

Firstly, men don't want to feel like they are taking "sexual advantage" of women, even though taking sexual advantage of women is NOT a real thing. Secondly, there is this complex brainwashing where you're made to feel as though you have a responsibility to women in your own age cohort. It's like if you go to a pound to get a dog and there is one that is really happy which you know would make you happy, but there's another one looking at you with sad eyes. You know that anyone who comes through will take the happy one, but you're worried that the sad-eyed one will end up in the kill room if you don't take it.

It is all a gigantic hoax by women collectively to manipulate men collectively. The most basic form of this dumb scheme is a woman saying you just only wanted her for sex. Most men feel guilty about having sex with a woman if she says "you just wanted me for sex...!" This is an evolutionary biology function. Because in the ye olden days before all of these insane scientific methods of self-inflicted infertility, if you had sex with a woman there was a pretty good chance she was pregnant, so she needs you to stick around. In order for the propagation of the species, you need to stick around, because you have to care for the child. So all of us have ancestors that were prone to being easily manipulated by women with such famous hoaxes as "you only just wanted me for sex...!"

Women understand all of this intuitively, presumably without being able to put it into any kind of words at all. They just do it. We are all effectively enslaved to women. When you combine this with the understanding that masculinity is effectively decided by women, given that women choose which men to reward with sex and thus confirm their masculinity, we have a situation in this society where women are effectively puppeteering the entire society.

We need to talk about this. It is embarrassing for men to admit that their entire lives have been nothing but manipulation by women.
 

Andrew Anglin

๐Ÿ ๐ŸŽ€ ๐“‚๐’ถ๐“ˆ๐“‰๐‘’๐“‡ ๐’ธ๐’ฝ๐’พ๐‘’๐’ป ๐ŸŽ€ ๐Ÿ
Old World Underground
She's not yours it's just your turn. ;)
MIC DROP.

Seriously.

I didn't see who you were even responding to and I'm not going to scroll up to check, so this isn't targeted at anyone but instead at everyone: pretending you have any ownership at all over a woman in this society is simply self-delusion. No one wants to admit this because they think they're somehow admitting they lack masculinity if they admit it. Men will instead pretend that they are unique. Both Brad Pitt and Johnny Depp - the defining sex symbols of multiple generations - got completely destroyed by women, but somehow you, a random guy, are going to maintain possession.

If you admit to yourself that she's not "yours" in any sense at all, that she can leave you at any time and has no responsibilities to meet if she does so, you're going to feel a lot less shitty when she decides to destroy your life.

Just call her what she is: "this bitch I've been bangin."

Because that is all she is, and until something changes in this society, that is all she is capable of being.
 

CuckSlayer

You've been back traced
Old World Underground
Literally, the appeal is that they're less "filthy" and emotionally ravaged. It is impossible for 95% of (white) women to have multiple sex partners and not develop psychological problems in proportion to the number of sex partners. It is equally impossible for a white woman in the modern era to do anything other than go out and sleep with a series of men.


This has nothing at all to do with men "taking advantage" or any of this other emotional manipulation horseshit. It's in fact exactly like someone who eats shit food and becomes fat. You don't claim that McDonald's is to blame for manipulating an innocent person - even though that would be much closer to a true statement, given that McDonald's has billion dollar Bernays ad campaigns whereas men do not run advertising campaigns.

Because all women will go on sex rampages, and 95% will develop serious psychological damage as a result, the ONLY measure that matters is age. Period. Even all of this stuff about a relationship with her father basically stopped being true when they started allowing women on the internet. None of them can resist, and they will basically all follow the same pattern of approximately 10-15 sex partners a year between the ages of 18 and 25. Before 18, they're in high school, so it is largely impossible to disguise the number, and most of them still - even in 2020 - are sensitive to whore-shaming and don't want it public how many men they're having sex with.

None of this is a complex mystery that needs solving. It is blatant and self explanatory and everyone reading this knows that what I am saying is true, including the women. Claiming that men of whatever age who prefer women with the lowest body count possible, and thus the lowest age possible, are somehow "predatory" is blatant emotional manipulation of men by women.

Firstly, men don't want to feel like they are taking "sexual advantage" of women, even though taking sexual advantage of women is NOT a real thing. Secondly, there is this complex brainwashing where you're made to feel as though you have a responsibility to women in your own age cohort. It's like if you go to a pound to get a dog and there is one that is really happy which you know would make you happy, but there's another one looking at you with sad eyes. You know that anyone who comes through will take the happy one, but you're worried that the sad-eyed one will end up in the kill room if you don't take it.

It is all a gigantic hoax by women collectively to manipulate men collectively. The most basic form of this dumb scheme is a woman saying you just only wanted her for sex. Most men feel guilty about having sex with a woman if she says "you just wanted me for sex...!" This is an evolutionary biology function. Because in the ye olden days before all of these insane scientific methods of self-inflicted infertility, if you had sex with a woman there was a pretty good chance she was pregnant, so she needs you to stick around. In order for the propagation of the species, you need to stick around, because you have to care for the child. So all of us have ancestors that were prone to being easily manipulated by women with such famous hoaxes as "you only just wanted me for sex...!"

Women understand all of this intuitively, presumably without being able to put it into any kind of words at all. They just do it. We are all effectively enslaved to women. When you combine this with the understanding that masculinity is effectively decided by women, given that women choose which men to reward with sex and thus confirm their masculinity, we have a situation in this society where women are effectively puppeteering the entire society.

We need to talk about this. It is embarrassing for men to admit that their entire lives have been nothing but manipulation by women.
It is puppeteering the evolutionary process. If this goes on for a few more generations you are going to end up with a species of cunt nanny overlords and human peacocks. You already see them everywhere.
 

Andrew Anglin

๐Ÿ ๐ŸŽ€ ๐“‚๐’ถ๐“ˆ๐“‰๐‘’๐“‡ ๐’ธ๐’ฝ๐’พ๐‘’๐’ป ๐ŸŽ€ ๐Ÿ
Old World Underground
That's the thing. If these women were at least properly feminine and talked about wanting babies, their attractiveness would make up for them being uninteresting.
Or if they just weren't all some combination of:

  1. Fat
  2. Hunched over like an elderly person from using their phones all the time and refusing to do stretches to counter the way this is changing their posture
  3. Aggressive and loud
They literally have no redeeming qualities, at all.

Zero.

They are disgusting monsters, and I will stand by that statement.

Here's a harsh reality: all women have the same purpose as a male tranny.
 

RedPillStormer

๐ŸŒฟ๐Ÿ˜ฉ๐Ÿ”ฅแดฎหกแตƒแถปแต‰ แดตแต—๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿค ๐Ÿšฌ
Old World Underground
Literally, the appeal is that they're less "filthy" and emotionally ravaged. It is impossible for 95% of (white) women to have multiple sex partners and not develop psychological problems in proportion to the number of sex partners. It is equally impossible for a white woman in the modern era to do anything other than go out and sleep with a series of men.


This has nothing at all to do with men "taking advantage" or any of this other emotional manipulation horseshit. It's in fact exactly like someone who eats shit food and becomes fat. You don't claim that McDonald's is to blame for manipulating an innocent person - even though that would be much closer to a true statement, given that McDonald's has billion dollar Bernays ad campaigns whereas men do not run advertising campaigns.

Because all women will go on sex rampages, and 95% will develop serious psychological damage as a result, the ONLY measure that matters is age. Period. Even all of this stuff about a relationship with her father basically stopped being true when they started allowing women on the internet. None of them can resist, and they will basically all follow the same pattern of approximately 10-15 sex partners a year between the ages of 18 and 25. Before 18, they're in high school, so it is largely impossible to disguise the number, and most of them still - even in 2020 - are sensitive to whore-shaming and don't want it public how many men they're having sex with.

None of this is a complex mystery that needs solving. It is blatant and self explanatory and everyone reading this knows that what I am saying is true, including the women. Claiming that men of whatever age who prefer women with the lowest body count possible, and thus the lowest age possible, are somehow "predatory" is blatant emotional manipulation of men by women.

Firstly, men don't want to feel like they are taking "sexual advantage" of women, even though taking sexual advantage of women is NOT a real thing. Secondly, there is this complex brainwashing where you're made to feel as though you have a responsibility to women in your own age cohort. It's like if you go to a pound to get a dog and there is one that is really happy which you know would make you happy, but there's another one looking at you with sad eyes. You know that anyone who comes through will take the happy one, but you're worried that the sad-eyed one will end up in the kill room if you don't take it.

It is all a gigantic hoax by women collectively to manipulate men collectively. The most basic form of this dumb scheme is a woman saying you just only wanted her for sex. Most men feel guilty about having sex with a woman if she says "you just wanted me for sex...!" This is an evolutionary biology function. Because in the ye olden days before all of these insane scientific methods of self-inflicted infertility, if you had sex with a woman there was a pretty good chance she was pregnant, so she needs you to stick around. In order for the propagation of the species, you need to stick around, because you have to care for the child. So all of us have ancestors that were prone to being easily manipulated by women with such famous hoaxes as "you only just wanted me for sex...!"

Women understand all of this intuitively, presumably without being able to put it into any kind of words at all. They just do it. We are all effectively enslaved to women. When you combine this with the understanding that masculinity is effectively decided by women, given that women choose which men to reward with sex and thus confirm their masculinity, we have a situation in this society where women are effectively puppeteering the entire society.

We need to talk about this. It is embarrassing for men to admit that their entire lives have been nothing but manipulation by women.
Truth, pure truth

Women understand all of this intuitively, presumably without being able to put it into any kind of words at all. They just do it. We are all effectively enslaved to women. When you combine this with the understanding that masculinity is effectively decided by women, given that women choose which men to reward with sex and thus confirm their masculinity, we have a situation in this society where women are effectively puppeteering the entire society.

We need to talk about this. It is embarrassing for men to admit that their entire lives have been nothing but manipulation by women.
Yes, very very very few men have the capabilities to detach from this system, that's how strongly ingrained it is.

The only ones that do are either natural psychopaths or natural "autists" (strong ability to detach and look at things from above).

I feel compelled to write about it, but it would take a while, and I am a bit tired now.
 

CuckSlayer

You've been back traced
Old World Underground
Or if they just weren't all some combination of:

  1. Fat
  2. Hunched over like an elderly person from using their phones all the time and refusing to do stretches to counter the way this is changing their posture
  3. Aggressive and loud
They literally have no redeeming qualities, at all.

Zero.

They are disgusting monsters, and I will stand by that statement.

Here's a harsh reality: all women have the same purpose as a male tranny.
You forgot self-centered and narcissistic. They think they are gods among mere humans. Dont ever imply they can be wrong. The shitty attitudes are as bad as the (lack of) morals and self-discipline.

delusion.jpg
 

RedPillStormer

๐ŸŒฟ๐Ÿ˜ฉ๐Ÿ”ฅแดฎหกแตƒแถปแต‰ แดตแต—๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿค ๐Ÿšฌ
Old World Underground
Here's a harsh reality: all women have the same purpose as a male tranny.
Here's an even harsher one. Male trannies get off on acting feminine.

Real women get off on being bossy and forcing men to follow stupid rules.

Women are worse than male trannies. Yes, even though male trannies have more STDs and more mental issues supposedly. Yes, it's that bad.
 

Andrew Anglin

๐Ÿ ๐ŸŽ€ ๐“‚๐’ถ๐“ˆ๐“‰๐‘’๐“‡ ๐’ธ๐’ฝ๐’พ๐‘’๐’ป ๐ŸŽ€ ๐Ÿ
Old World Underground
In my experience they are readily agreeable to it if you bring it up on like the 1st date. Heh I literally go "yeah I'm looking for a housewife to have like unlimited children until she can't anymore" and even the "independent strong woman" I've dated 1-2 of will be "that sounds nice! whatever you say!" after like 5 minutes of "i'm not so sure". I was hesitant when I was younger but I've found women literally just agree to anything I say, it was pretty surprising at first.
I was gonna say after reading this paragraph "yeah but you're still looking for a viable bitch though."

Yes, if she likes you, she'll toy around with whatever you're saying, because women do not have ideas and have literally nothing going on in their heads. So you saying this shit puts images in her brain and she's like "oh, yeah, huh, interesting...!"

Then between 24 hours and 24 months later, she's bored of whatever it was is looking for some other thing to do.

When you say things like what I just said, people will instinctively claim that this is some personal issue the person saying it has. Well, I don't talk about my private life. But I will tell you that I spent between the end of high school and the age of 33 not ever even thinking about knowing a woman for more than a week. So no, this is not based on my personal experience: it is based on watching everyone around me, and every other situation I am aware of. Everyone knows this is true. If someone brings up this "it's just you bro you've got something wrong with you," then ask that faggot to tell him about all fo the successful relationships he himself is aware of.

Not "I know a few couple" - tell them to describe the relationship specifically, and how long they've been together.

This is a fucking hoax. It is the only hoax ever that is bigger than coronavirus.

I honestly need better sources but I am under the impression the idea that you go to work and then spend most of your time around a woman beyond that is unnatural.
No, that is horrible. A marriage is a business contract for the purpose of reproducing. Spending time with women, other than having dinner together a few nights a week, is an abomination and an attack on the basic order of nature. Women's company is horrible. No one wants to be around them. They are boring, annoying, cruel, malicious, sadistic, unmannerly and stupid. All they know is mcdonaldโ€™s, charge they phone, twerk, be bisexual, eat hot chip & lie.
 

AmericanHero

America First
Old World Underground
Then between 24 hours and 24 months later, she's bored of whatever it was is looking for some other thing to do.

No, that is horrible. A marriage is a business contract for the purpose of reproducing. Spending time with women, other than having dinner together a few nights a week, is an abomination and an attack on the basic order of nature. Women's company is horrible. No one wants to be around them. They are boring, annoying, cruel, malicious, sadistic, unmannerly and stupid. All they know is mcdonaldโ€™s, charge they phone, twerk, be bisexual, eat hot chip & lie.
I think we're on the same page. Religious social pressure and constant child production is what I have come up with as theoretical mechanisms to keep them locked in with any reasonable rate of success, but it won't change their nature. I think any interaction with women beyond producing a family is essentially an anti-christian abomination beyond like friendly greetings.

I'd be interested to hear more of your thoughts on the "relationships are spending time your best friend" concept. Truth be told I think it is one of the worst and most pervasive paradigms going around right now. I literally can't spend more than 10 minutes with one beyond sex without getting bored to tears The interests don't overlap. And relatively quickly over time in my youth I lost all interest in casual and non-procreative sex.

I'm painfully low on historical backing on the concept beyond anecdotes of Irish men going to work, then the pub with their boys, home to sleep with the wife on repeat. Something seems very wrong to me how people are doing this "best buddies" thing with their wives. Especially the ones who let them tag along to mens only social events...good lord. I'd enjoy your thoughts on how the sexes should properly relate and the issues we currently face beyond the obvious and glaring sexual chastity nightmare we're facing.
 

nukeisreal

AltReich
Old World Underground
Both Brad Pitt and Johnny Depp - the defining sex symbols of multiple generations - got completely destroyed by women, but somehow you, a random guy, are going to maintain possession.
Pitt and Depp are both brainwashed fagboys, and this is reflected in the stupidity of their decisions to pick obviously evil women like Jolie and that Depp's bitch when they are millionares who could literally set up breeding farms with teenage girls of choice.

There are men who have none of their wealth and status but are orders of magnitude more masculine and woman-wise, and yeah, probably a random guy on DS has better chances than Pitt and Depp, because he'd know what traps to avoid, what to look for, and how to deal with a bitch. And if they are smart men can skew certain factors in their favor so women have a lot to lose (including their life) if they decide to destroy you.

I'm not against the general argument that the situation for men is horrible, but to use Pitt and Depp as examples of how even the top men have issues with women betrays a flawed understanding of masculinity and who the "top men" are on your part.
 

RedPillStormer

๐ŸŒฟ๐Ÿ˜ฉ๐Ÿ”ฅแดฎหกแตƒแถปแต‰ แดตแต—๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿค ๐Ÿšฌ
Old World Underground
Pitt and Depp are both brainwashed fagboys, and this is reflected in the stupidity of their decisions to pick obviously evil women like Jolie and that Depp's bitch when they are millionares who could literally set up breeding farms with teenage girls of choice.

There are men who have none of their wealth and status but are orders of magnitude more masculine and woman-wise, and yeah, probably a random guy on DS has better chances than Pitt and Depp, because he'd know what traps to avoid, what to look for, and how to deal with a bitch. And if they are smart men can skew certain factors in their favor so women have a lot to lose (including their life) if they decide to destroy you.

I'm not against the general argument that the situation for men is horrible, but to use Pitt and Depp as examples of how even the top men have issues with women betrays a flawed understanding of masculinity and who the "top men" are on your part.
Muh mythical redpill alpha who can make it work.

Yes, a "woke" dude will avoid the worst bisexual hot chip twerk thots, but the idea that anyone is so "woke" he can out-alpha SWAT teams she will call over "domestic abuse" ? Good luck with that.

If Brad Pitt couldn't do it, chances are most men won't be able either. First, you can't be in Hollywood and not be a cuck. They will eat you alive for that.

But even if we take millionaires. Those guys still get messed up by women.

You are not so special that you can make it work. No one is. Some guys just get lucky, somehow.

Sure, some men do better, but getting shot only 7 times instead of 17, metaphorically speaking, is not that much better.
 

CuckSlayer

You've been back traced
Old World Underground
>I'd enjoy your thoughts on how the sexes should properly relate and the issues we currently face beyond the obvious and glaring sexual chastity nightmare we're facing.

Coverture. Nuff said. Then you delete anything in the legal code pertaining to no-fault divorce and "domestic violence". Women can keep bitching at and about eachother in between watching netflix and stuffing their faces.

Actual monogamy and early marriage solves most of the chastity problem.
 

SouthsideJohnny

Well-known member
Old World Underground
When you combine this with the understanding that masculinity is effectively decided by women, given that women choose which men to reward with sex and thus confirm their masculinity, we have a situation in this society where women are effectively puppeteering the entire society.
Exactly. Women whine all the time about "toxic masculinity," but they don't realize that they're the ones responsible for it in the first place. If chicks thought it was actually attractive if men were nice and submissve, then every man would act that way. The truth is, hoes are simply attracted to violent and aggressive behavior, which is why so many of them get beaten and murdered.

Probably our biggest weakness as men is that we're basically enslaved by our desire for women. Not only do we want to fuck them, but we want to love them, care for them, etc. Without that instinct, there would be no feminism, since Jews used our natural affection for them to get white men on board with supporting insane policies like no-fault divorce, unlimited birth control, etc. If we in general just snapped out of our collective horny haze, then we'd have a much better system going forward.

Spending time with women, other than having dinner together a few nights a week, is an abomination and an attack on the basic order of nature. Women's company is horrible. No one wants to be around them. They are boring, annoying, cruel, malicious, sadistic, unmannerly and stupid.
This is probably the biggest mistake people make. I'm not going to say people can't develop decent relationships with women(most of our grandparents managed to stay together for decades and obviously loved each other, for example), but as a rule friendships and relatioships with other men are much more fulfilling in basically every way. Other guys are more fun to be around, less argumentative, more intellectually stimulating, etc. Even women themselves know this, which is why they hate being around each other. It's a waste of time to obsessively pursue relationships with dumb broads who aren't even interested in that soft stuff anyway.
 

RedPillStormer

๐ŸŒฟ๐Ÿ˜ฉ๐Ÿ”ฅแดฎหกแตƒแถปแต‰ แดตแต—๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿค ๐Ÿšฌ
Old World Underground
Probably our biggest weakness as men is that we're basically enslaved by our desire for women. Not only do we want to fuck them, but we want to love them, care for them, etc. Without that instinct, there would be no feminism, since Jews used our natural affection for them to get white men on board with supporting insane policies like no-fault divorce, unlimited birth control, etc. If we in general just snapped out of our collective horny haze, then we'd have a much better system going forward.
Without that instinct there would have been no reproduction historically.
All men who were not enslaved by female desire simply didn't reproduce.

I remember a study that showed that being horny lowers IQ.
Nature made men go dumb while being horny to reproduce with women. Because no rational man would ever want to have to deal with one.
Natural selection also selects for simps. Because non-simps don't waste time on women. Thus, not being a simp is a rare trait.

There is no fixing this. This is biology. The thing that can be fixed is culture to nudge things in a different direction and social institutions like arranged marriages to best deal with the issue.
 

eatsdick1

Active member
I thought you meant in the other direction!
Look man, we can't marry 14-year-olds as much as I would like to. I could draw a graph for you outlining female craziness vs. age. But essentially it goes normal(<18) -> completely batshit insane(18-25) -> pretending to be normal in order to attract a mate(26-32) -> completely batshit insane bitter man-hater(33+). Since we can't kidnap women from their dads, we must take the best we can get. Or we could kidnap women from their dads. But we shouldn't do that.
An educated woman can be made to work for you. That's what Blacks do. They send their women off to work and make them hand over the money.
Accepting a situation where your mate makes more money and has more options than you is completely retarded and puts you at her mercy. You should always be in control of the situation as a man. In the past, women did not have the option to leave their man and this led to relatively stable, happy relationships. We should strive to recreate that as closely as possible. We cannot legally or physically prevent them from leaving, but we can provide as many incentives as possible to nearly ensure that they wonโ€™t.

Go for uneducated girls if possible. This becomes less possible all the time since women are 60% of college grads now and rising. Go average-looking, go slightly chubby, go stupid. This is the key to happiness. Smart bitches are problem bitches.

La Binz is the shining example of what to aspire to. She was essentially locked in her house barefoot taking care of the kids while her husband worked abroad. His mistakes were 1. not at least pretending to care about her, 2. not coming home and fucking her every night.
 

Italo-Canadian

Jesus is King
Old World Underground
Real women get off on being bossy and forcing men to follow stupid rules.
@Andrew Anglin said:
all women have the same purpose as a male tranny
What is the purpose? A trick, i.e., a con job, phoniness that bears no fruit: when they play with their hair and give themselves a wedgie with their leggings (ever notice how they really pull them up), they're doing it to grab attention and for sexual (perverse) gratification. In both cases you're left with a semblance of femininity without the genuine article - modesty; bearing children and raising them to be God-fearing, moral adults).
 
Top