Occult Secrets of Immortality - Robert Sepehr

Who built the pyramids in Giza and polygonal mega stones in Cusco?
I don’t disagree that our past is Europe for thousand of years either. But like Sepehr I believe there is a lot of evidence of a civilization of very large light eyed and blonde and red headed large people ( maybe even giants, maybe there were two separate civilizations? The possibilities are many we know very little fact wise) that were sea fairing ( meaning the could have came from Atlantis? And even more older Mu or the ancient North Pole hyberbernia (sp?) ) , and had plenty of knowledge And technology on building and agriculture. They left their mark and knowledge on every civilization, so on and so forth.
 
Last edited:

antirelativist

Member
Old World Underground
What Sepehr is hinting at, not being explicit about for fear of deplatforming, is an esoteric history narrative surrounding Atlantis as a genetic, cultural, and spiritual common ancestor for white civilizations around the world. He isn't doing anything particularly new, but it is something that is difficult to find information on and difficult to piece together. That isn't a swing at his work though, he does tremendously good work and I am a huge fan.

You have to go to various sources to get this whole picture. Plato, various spiritual and mythological traditions and histories where whites spent time in the past, some of the "gnostic" writings declared heresies by Irenaeus and company, taboo archaeological topics, various historical source documents, etc. There isn't really a good single book to tell this story, because it has been lost through the ages. If you are comfortable reading about a lot of esoteric autism without getting offended, Manly P. Hall's The Secret Teachings of All Ages covers a lot of this stuff in a survey fashion.

The term "Atlantis" here is a nice stand-in, but may or may not have been the name used by these ancients. I'm going to use language like "Atlantis" and "white people" just to make it easy to read. Sources generally have different specific language for these ideas but it makes it more readable to speak plainly.

The general idea is that Atlantis existed as the original birthplace of civilization, the home of the white race. Most traditions generally agree on the metaphysics of the Apocryphon of John in the regard that the Atlanteans were the race of men created in the image of God and given a soul and a spirit, while other men existed on earth in a more imperfect form and likely lacking a soul or having difficulty recognizing its presence. The Atlanteans built up their civilization and were responsible for everything from the domestication of animals to naval technology. At their peak they engaged in lots of exploration and colonization around the world, resulting in many of the megalithic ruins found around the world accompanied by stories of giant white gods from the sea bringing the gift of civilization. In this context, the "giants" of history were white people from Atlantis, whose adult males tended to be around 6 feet tall compared to the rest of the world's men sitting closer to 4 feet.

At some point a cataclysm occurred and Atlantis was lost in the ocean. This is of course echoed by all of the worldwide flood myths found in most mythological traditions. An interesting point comes up here in the early Christian literature, which is echoed across many esoteric historical traditions, from the Apocryphon of John again. Noah was but one of many survivors of the pre-flood world. Satan or the Demiurge, whichever you prefer, decided to try to wipe out the race of men made in the image of God, and a war ensued. God warned Noah, who warned many people who did heed his call, to leave before Atlantis was lost. By some unspecified mechanism, Atlantis was flooded. The flood in this view was not worldwide. It primarily affected the "civilized world" of Atlantis.

All of the various white mythological traditions about founding gods were then based on the stories of the kings of Atlantis (10 of them, consequently) that led their people to new homes across Europe, Asia, and North Africa. Odin and Zeus, for example, were almost certainly real men who were tribal leaders of Atlanteans fleeing the destruction of their home and trying to rebuild civilization. By many accounts, the war with Satan, if you will, continued after Atlantis and spilled into much of the "new world" of white people. Mythological traditions about a war with the "gods" likely reflects this.

An interesting note here from gnostic writings covers the idea that humans and "fallen angels" mixed at some point. Early gnostic writings suggest that after the flood, a group of angelic beings tried to trick whites into breeding with them. Initially the women rejected the angels in their male forms, so the angels took female forms and tricked some men into reproducing. This introduced a third group of humans to the world, described as having a large degree of the intelligence and physical characteristics of whites, but lacking certain moral qualities.

History from that point forward becomes the story of various groups of white people trying to re-establish their old ideal civilization and struggling against corruption from within and without. Occult teachings are held to be actual metaphysical teachings from God going back to Atlantis and shortly after the flood, which are continually corrupted by wicked people and turned into what we think of as faggy freemasons and the like. There are various attempts at explaining the Jews' place in this cosmology, ranging from a group of whites that made a blood pact with Satan for worldy power to descendants of the angels that bred with humans.

It is really interesting and challenging stuff to get into. It will definitely test your discernment and your patience to pour over tons of autism and seeming contradictions that come down through a millenia-long game of telephone from various sources. The most interesting part is that at the end of it you can arrive at a picture that provides a clear history of mankind and plainly points at Christianity, not in the modern form, being a continuous spiritual tradition of whites and incorporating a lot of groups you wouldn't have expected.

I'm not exactly an expert on this stuff but I love reading about it and talking about it so if you have any questions feel free to ask.
 

Craniology

녀-Waffen
Old World Underground
Who built the pyramids in Giza and polygonal mega stones in Cusco?
First would be sand niggers.
Second a bunch of Injuns
Robert Sepehr just got banned from Faceberg as of now, anyone with working twitter acc plz confirm this since I'm banned from accessing that.
Edit: too many swastikas in videos I guess.
Don't agree with his stuff but that's another bullshit banning.
 

WhiteNations4Whites

Well-known member
Old World Underground
Yeah, I believe you can always repent. But repentance in itself becomes harder the more evil you do. It's been like six years and I still feel alienated from humanity. Crimes change your soul. Thankfully God is working on me and it's not as bad as it well but I'm still missing part of my humanity. Like a loss of innocent but more hardcore than the kind normal kids go through.
Experiencing weird shit can definitely cause PTSD-like changes in attitude. And anyone that has never experienced that level of adversity won't understand and will just mock you.
 

Iconoclast

Well-known member
Old World Underground
a bunch of Injuns with deformed heads.
You can't possibly be serious.

How would you explain the parietal plate issue - a clear anatomic difference, not a malformation - and the much higher brain capacity of the coneheads? ( 25% - 250% more!! ) These are not skulls deformed by head-binding, though those also exist.

Are you actually claiming that they all "coincidentally" had the same "malformation" in the same regular way? Wouldn't that be the definition of a different phenotype, implying a different species or sub-species - or race?

There is no shame in admitting you don't know something.

Another good article on the skulls.
 

Craniology

녀-Waffen
Old World Underground
How would you explain the parietal plate issue
There's no "Parietal Plate".
There's a structure called Parietal Bone, that is fused with the frontal bone at the front, the Occipital Bone at it's back, the Temporal Bone at it's external lateral, and with the other Parietal one at it's internal lateral.
In all the examples this bone is deformed as the case with the frontal and the Occipital.
and the much higher brain capacity of the coneheads?
At no part of the linked article there's any mention of what is the endocephalic volume of any of the skulls. The guy just wrote stuff without providing any data.
Are you actually claiming that they all "coincidentally" had the same "malformation" in the same regular way?
They are all purposefully produced with the same method.

Just to be clear, you think they are aliens while the other guy thinks they are white.
Correct?
 

Iconoclast

Well-known member
Old World Underground
I can practically hear your contempt dripping off the page.

There's no "Parietal Plate".
There's a structure called Parietal Bone, that is fused with the frontal bone at the front, the Occipital Bone at it's back, the Temporal Bone at it's external lateral, and with the other Parietal one at it's internal lateral.
In all the examples this bone is deformed as the case with the frontal and the Occipital.
Regarding the "parietal plate". Excuse me if I used a slightly off term from the official anatomical one, it shouldn't take a genius to figure out I am talking about the two parietal bones melded by the sagittal suture. Surely if you claim to have some skull anatomy knowledge this should be pretty obvious to you.
1590209139000.png
The Paracas skulls appear to have NO saggital suture. Possibly it would have fused completely during development, I don't know, but standard H. sapiens doesn't, so that's pretty weird. They also clearly have the coronal suture visible, so you can't say that their skull plates just merged completely somehow. I would say that's a pretty significant anatomical difference that is not accounted for by deliberate deformation. That's what I was talking about, but you prefer to be deliberately disingenuous.
1590209297300.png

At no part of the linked article there's any mention of what is the endocephalic volume of any of the skulls. The guy just wrote stuff without providing any data.
No, that specific article did not have specific volumes quoted. However:

1590208210600.png

Just to be clear, you think they are aliens while the other guy thinks they are white.
Correct?
At no time did I say I though they were aliens, this is you trying to make me look un-serious. I stated that I thought they were another sub-species of Homo sapiens, which I think is most likely.


This will be my last post regarding this issue as clearly I have stated everything I have to say . I am rather disappointed that you were just dismissive and nitpicky and really didn't have anything useful to say considering that you present yourself as having some knowledge of or at least interest in these sort of things.
 

KangO'DaKrakas

Active member
D
What Sepehr is hinting at, not being explicit about for fear of deplatforming, is an esoteric history narrative surrounding Atlantis as a genetic, cultural, and spiritual common ancestor for white civilizations around the world. He isn't doing anything particularly new, but it is something that is difficult to find information on and difficult to piece together. That isn't a swing at his work though, he does tremendously good work and I am a huge fan.

You have to go to various sources to get this whole picture. Plato, various spiritual and mythological traditions and histories where whites spent time in the past, some of the "gnostic" writings declared heresies by Irenaeus and company, taboo archaeological topics, various historical source documents, etc. There isn't really a good single book to tell this story, because it has been lost through the ages. If you are comfortable reading about a lot of esoteric autism without getting offended, Manly P. Hall's The Secret Teachings of All Ages covers a lot of this stuff in a survey fashion.

The term "Atlantis" here is a nice stand-in, but may or may not have been the name used by these ancients. I'm going to use language like "Atlantis" and "white people" just to make it easy to read. Sources generally have different specific language for these ideas but it makes it more readable to speak plainly.

The general idea is that Atlantis existed as the original birthplace of civilization, the home of the white race. Most traditions generally agree on the metaphysics of the Apocryphon of John in the regard that the Atlanteans were the race of men created in the image of God and given a soul and a spirit, while other men existed on earth in a more imperfect form and likely lacking a soul or having difficulty recognizing its presence. The Atlanteans built up their civilization and were responsible for everything from the domestication of animals to naval technology. At their peak they engaged in lots of exploration and colonization around the world, resulting in many of the megalithic ruins found around the world accompanied by stories of giant white gods from the sea bringing the gift of civilization. In this context, the "giants" of history were white people from Atlantis, whose adult males tended to be around 6 feet tall compared to the rest of the world's men sitting closer to 4 feet.

At some point a cataclysm occurred and Atlantis was lost in the ocean. This is of course echoed by all of the worldwide flood myths found in most mythological traditions. An interesting point comes up here in the early Christian literature, which is echoed across many esoteric historical traditions, from the Apocryphon of John again. Noah was but one of many survivors of the pre-flood world. Satan or the Demiurge, whichever you prefer, decided to try to wipe out the race of men made in the image of God, and a war ensued. God warned Noah, who warned many people who did heed his call, to leave before Atlantis was lost. By some unspecified mechanism, Atlantis was flooded. The flood in this view was not worldwide. It primarily affected the "civilized world" of Atlantis.

All of the various white mythological traditions about founding gods were then based on the stories of the kings of Atlantis (10 of them, consequently) that led their people to new homes across Europe, Asia, and North Africa. Odin and Zeus, for example, were almost certainly real men who were tribal leaders of Atlanteans fleeing the destruction of their home and trying to rebuild civilization. By many accounts, the war with Satan, if you will, continued after Atlantis and spilled into much of the "new world" of white people. Mythological traditions about a war with the "gods" likely reflects this.

An interesting note here from gnostic writings covers the idea that humans and "fallen angels" mixed at some point. Early gnostic writings suggest that after the flood, a group of angelic beings tried to trick whites into breeding with them. Initially the women rejected the angels in their male forms, so the angels took female forms and tricked some men into reproducing. This introduced a third group of humans to the world, described as having a large degree of the intelligence and physical characteristics of whites, but lacking certain moral qualities.

History from that point forward becomes the story of various groups of white people trying to re-establish their old ideal civilization and struggling against corruption from within and without. Occult teachings are held to be actual metaphysical teachings from God going back to Atlantis and shortly after the flood, which are continually corrupted by wicked people and turned into what we think of as faggy freemasons and the like. There are various attempts at explaining the Jews' place in this cosmology, ranging from a group of whites that made a blood pact with Satan for worldy power to descendants of the angels that bred with humans.

It is really interesting and challenging stuff to get into. It will definitely test your discernment and your patience to pour over tons of autism and seeming contradictions that come down through a millenia-long game of telephone from various sources. The most interesting part is that at the end of it you can arrive at a picture that provides a clear history of mankind and plainly points at Christianity, not in the modern form, being a continuous spiritual tradition of whites and incorporating a lot of groups you wouldn't have expected.

I'm not exactly an expert on this stuff but I love reading about it and talking about it so if you have any questions feel free to ask.
Does The Secret Book of John mention Atlantis?
 
What Sepehr is hinting at, not being explicit about for fear of deplatforming, is an esoteric history narrative surrounding Atlantis as a genetic, cultural, and spiritual common ancestor for white civilizations around the world. He isn't doing anything particularly new, but it is something that is difficult to find information on and difficult to piece together. That isn't a swing at his work though, he does tremendously good work and I am a huge fan.

You have to go to various sources to get this whole picture. Plato, various spiritual and mythological traditions and histories where whites spent time in the past, some of the "gnostic" writings declared heresies by Irenaeus and company, taboo archaeological topics, various historical source documents, etc. There isn't really a good single book to tell this story, because it has been lost through the ages. If you are comfortable reading about a lot of esoteric autism without getting offended, Manly P. Hall's The Secret Teachings of All Ages covers a lot of this stuff in a survey fashion.

The term "Atlantis" here is a nice stand-in, but may or may not have been the name used by these ancients. I'm going to use language like "Atlantis" and "white people" just to make it easy to read. Sources generally have different specific language for these ideas but it makes it more readable to speak plainly.

The general idea is that Atlantis existed as the original birthplace of civilization, the home of the white race. Most traditions generally agree on the metaphysics of the Apocryphon of John in the regard that the Atlanteans were the race of men created in the image of God and given a soul and a spirit, while other men existed on earth in a more imperfect form and likely lacking a soul or having difficulty recognizing its presence. The Atlanteans built up their civilization and were responsible for everything from the domestication of animals to naval technology. At their peak they engaged in lots of exploration and colonization around the world, resulting in many of the megalithic ruins found around the world accompanied by stories of giant white gods from the sea bringing the gift of civilization. In this context, the "giants" of history were white people from Atlantis, whose adult males tended to be around 6 feet tall compared to the rest of the world's men sitting closer to 4 feet.

At some point a cataclysm occurred and Atlantis was lost in the ocean. This is of course echoed by all of the worldwide flood myths found in most mythological traditions. An interesting point comes up here in the early Christian literature, which is echoed across many esoteric historical traditions, from the Apocryphon of John again. Noah was but one of many survivors of the pre-flood world. Satan or the Demiurge, whichever you prefer, decided to try to wipe out the race of men made in the image of God, and a war ensued. God warned Noah, who warned many people who did heed his call, to leave before Atlantis was lost. By some unspecified mechanism, Atlantis was flooded. The flood in this view was not worldwide. It primarily affected the "civilized world" of Atlantis.

All of the various white mythological traditions about founding gods were then based on the stories of the kings of Atlantis (10 of them, consequently) that led their people to new homes across Europe, Asia, and North Africa. Odin and Zeus, for example, were almost certainly real men who were tribal leaders of Atlanteans fleeing the destruction of their home and trying to rebuild civilization. By many accounts, the war with Satan, if you will, continued after Atlantis and spilled into much of the "new world" of white people. Mythological traditions about a war with the "gods" likely reflects this.

An interesting note here from gnostic writings covers the idea that humans and "fallen angels" mixed at some point. Early gnostic writings suggest that after the flood, a group of angelic beings tried to trick whites into breeding with them. Initially the women rejected the angels in their male forms, so the angels took female forms and tricked some men into reproducing. This introduced a third group of humans to the world, described as having a large degree of the intelligence and physical characteristics of whites, but lacking certain moral qualities.

History from that point forward becomes the story of various groups of white people trying to re-establish their old ideal civilization and struggling against corruption from within and without. Occult teachings are held to be actual metaphysical teachings from God going back to Atlantis and shortly after the flood, which are continually corrupted by wicked people and turned into what we think of as faggy freemasons and the like. There are various attempts at explaining the Jews' place in this cosmology, ranging from a group of whites that made a blood pact with Satan for worldy power to descendants of the angels that bred with humans.

It is really interesting and challenging stuff to get into. It will definitely test your discernment and your patience to pour over tons of autism and seeming contradictions that come down through a millenia-long game of telephone from various sources. The most interesting part is that at the end of it you can arrive at a picture that provides a clear history of mankind and plainly points at Christianity, not in the modern form, being a continuous spiritual tradition of whites and incorporating a lot of groups you wouldn't have expected.

I'm not exactly an expert on this stuff but I love reading about it and talking about it so if you have any questions feel free to ask.
Very well said, Sir.
 

antirelativist

Member
Old World Underground
Very well said, Sir.
thank you
D

Does The Secret Book of John mention Atlantis?
Not by name. It gives an alternative narrative to the story of Noah and the flood:

"And he (the chief archon)[Satan/The Demiurge] repented for everything which had come into being through him. This time he planned to bring a flood upon the work of man. But the greatness of the light of the foreknowledge[God] informed Noah, and he proclaimed (it) to all the offspring which are the sons of men. But those who were strangers to him did not listen to him. It is not as Moses said, 'They hid themselves in an ark' (Gn 7: 7), but they hid themselves in a place, not only Noah, but also many other people from the immovable race. They went into a place and hid themselves in a luminous cloud. And he (Noah) recognized his authority, and she who belongs to the light was with him, having shone on them because he (the chief archon) had brought darkness upon the whole earth.
 

antirelativist

Member
Old World Underground
Wait. So Satan created man and he also caused the Flood? Not God?

And God is a "she"?

And God is a light?

And there was no Ark but a cloud?

Is this stuff possibly a forgery?
This is coming from early Christian writings that were declared heresies in the 2nd century. In this view, Satan is the Demiurge, or the shaper of the material world. Satan believed himself to be the actual most-high God and declared himself so. When God actually appeared to him, he didn't understand what he was looking at and attempted to create a physical form in the image of what he saw, Adam's body. God then imbued Adam with a soul, leaving the demiurge without one, who became jealous and angry over this. This cosmogony is covered most directly in the Apocryphon of John, but also many, many other sources, even from pre-Christian white cultures.

A lot of this ties in with early Christians like Marcion, who were arguing that the Jews' deity was actually Satan, whom they had made a blood pact with. Marcion, among many others, argued that Jesus was not sent by the Jews' god, Satan, but by the actual one true God.
 

KangO'DaKrakas

Active member
This is coming from early Christian writings that were declared heresies in the 2nd century. In this view, Satan is the Demiurge, or the shaper of the material world. Satan believed himself to be the actual most-high God and declared himself so. When God actually appeared to him, he didn't understand what he was looking at and attempted to create a physical form in the image of what he saw, Adam's body. God then imbued Adam with a soul, leaving the demiurge without one, who became jealous and angry over this. This cosmogony is covered most directly in the Apocryphon of John, but also many, many other sources, even from pre-Christian white cultures.

A lot of this ties in with early Christians like Marcion, who were arguing that the Jews' deity was actually Satan, whom they had made a blood pact with. Marcion, among many others, argued that Jesus was not sent by the Jews' god, Satan, but by the actual one true God.
So Satan created the first man in the image of God, Adam?

What pre-Christian writings claim a Satan created the first man?

I'm truly curious.
 

antirelativist

Member
Old World Underground
So Satan created the first man in the image of God, Adam?
According to this narrative, yes.

What pre-Christian writings claim a Satan created the first man?
You won't find the word Satan in anything. I'm editorializing for ease of reading, as I said in my first post. The idea of a physical shaper of the universe that is separate and lower than God comes up all over the place. Plato introduced the word "Demiurge" in Timaeus and laid out his conception of it. The easiest way to find reference to this stuff would probably be reading Manly P Hall's The Secret Teachings of All Ages if you are interested. He gives a survey of esoteric teachings through a wide variety of cultures that can help piece this all together.

I'm not really arguing all of this as 100% fact and that I have all the answers btw. I find this whole topic really interesting and have read quite a bit on it. My main point was that this is the narrative that Robert Sepehr is presenting in his video series, but he doesn't put it all together plainly because it touches some points that tend to get you in trouble with the internet mommies.
 

Craniology

녀-Waffen
Old World Underground

Mistaf

Interesting Times Traveler
Old World Underground
Who built the pyramids in Giza and polygonal mega stones in Cusco?
Ayrabs and Injuns. ;)

This guy here argues a continuity between South America, the Canary Islands and North Africa.

The culture hero and creator god of Peru was called by the Incas Kon-Tiki Viracocha. He was “supposed to have come from the west and to have returned westward, disappearing in the ocean.”

There were Peruvian legends that told of “giants who came across the Pacific, conquered Peru and erected great buildings”.

One culture hero of Brazil was Sumé, who was “a white, bearded man who, however, came from the east, not the west. He introduced agriculture, and had power to raise and still tempests”. Paye-tome was another culture hero of Brazil, and he was also a white man.

The culture hero of Chile was a white man who “performed miracles and cured the sick; he caused rain to fall and crops to grow, and kindled fire at breath”.

The culture hero of the Muisca people of Colombia was Bochica, who “gave laws to the Muyscas, was a white, bearded man, wearing long robes, who regulated the calendar, established festivals, and vanished in time like the others”.
There is no doubt that there were Caucasoids in Peru during the times of the ancient civilizations. The mummies of the Paracas culture, which lasted from 800 to 100 BC, were Caucasoid, as is evident from their hair. The mummies of the Nazca culture, which flourished from 100 BC to 800 AD, were also Caucasoid. A major burial site of the Nazca culture was the Chauchilla Cemetery. It was established in 200 AD and continued to be used for 600 to 700 years. The hair of the Chauchilla Cemetery mummies in the following photographs is obviously Caucasoid. And note that they’re all wearing long robes.
1590482218215.png

1590482270619.png
The ceramic vessels in the photograph below were produced by the Moche culture, which flourished from 100 to 800 AD. They all have beards, and their facial features are obviously Caucasoid. And again, they’re all wearing long robes.
1590482460071.png
"Look huwhite to me."

 
Last edited:
Ayrabs and Injuns. ;)

This guy here argues a continuity between South America, the Canary Islands and North Africa.




View attachment 6685

View attachment 6686

View attachment 6687
"Look huwhite to me."

This is basically what the Maori red head spoke of in a video I posted up thread. Her family had been passing down her ancestry and they spoke of being from South America then going to Egypt or Iran. Her dna proves her familys tale as well.

**in the video I posted you’ll only see her at around 11:15. I’m trying to find the full doc she was in where she speaks more of her ancestors. My bad I thought she did so in this video
 
Last edited:
Top