Occult Secrets of Immortality - Robert Sepehr

_live_free_or_die

Active member
You should write an ebook and set up an account to sell it. There are tons of people on /x/ that have been trying to summon sex demons for ages.
Another problem with writing a ebook is the statue of limitations. Huge shocker, demons go hand in hand with serious crimes. I don't want to type up a confession and go to nigger zoo. I've never told another soul the details of it.

Idk

I don't really like to talk about it ANYWAY. I just feel compelled to bring it up whenever the occult is mentioned because Jesus delivered me from evil and I want to share that testimony.
 
Ugh, he is married to a light negress/mulatto, so his views on race are as you might expect. It's very disappointing; these white men end up going to all these cool archeological sites, but they are all in shitskin countries now of course, and they end up closely associating with non-whites to get site access and their research done - and what do you know; the mulatto or mestizo wife more often than not becomes a fixture. (there is another one of these prominent megalith guys who is with a mestizo...it escapes me at the moment) I wish we could finally have a serious researcher into the ancient stuff that took a real pro-white stance - it all needs to be synthesized and evaluated properly. There is so much crap mixed in with the really interesting stuff. When I discovered the Paranormies I was excited thinking that is what they were - I was sorely disappointed. More ofthen than not I know more about their topic and correct their stupid pronunciations!
You’re right and Isn’t graham hancock married to an African?
 

antirelativist

Member
Old World Underground
Robert Sepehr does great work. He tends to disguise what he is actually getting at because he is very nervous about getting banned from youtube for being too direct. Sometimes that makes him go off on odd tangents that make you scratch your head. You have to look at his videos in chronological groupings that have a big picture.
 

KangO'DaKrakas

Active member
Robert Sephre (is that a real name?) is all over the place. Watched some of his videos and they all jump around without any coherent tie in. Maybe his books are better? Maybe his videos are there as bait to get you to buy his books?

I mean, why not concentrate on one in-depth subject and give your thesis and then support it? Instead we go all over to the world, in all ages, in all possible scenarios and never get an answer to anything.

My jewdar is going off big time or at least my grifterdar.

Furthermore, this guy is not naming the Jew or doing anything that someone like Graham Hancock does yet he hides his face. Why? He also claims to be an anthropologist. Where is he an anthropologist? Where did he study?
 
Last edited:

Iconoclast

Well-known member
Old World Underground
You’re right and Isn’t graham hancock married to an African?
Ah yes, you're right; I believe Hancock is married to the nigger and Forester to a mestiza - anyway, both hooked up with non-whites. What a shame, becasue they are very intelligent and very white - could have had great kids and passed on a legacy. The destruction of the white race continues...:(
 

pen-meister

Well-known member
Old World Underground
me: Genghis Khan being white with grey eyes has supports from some historians and writers that were his contemporaries or near his time
me: are you saying We Weren't KANGS?
Not of the Mongols.
Like me all groups have their "Kangs" narratives including Chinese and Persians who have pushed the Mongols as "wild nomads" and pushed their e stories of where and how Genghis Khan fits into history. Words like "Mongol" and "Tatar" are used in and out of context in different historical time frames. "Mongol" at least until the 17th-18th centuries was less an ethnic than political term.
My first compelling reason or clue for my view on Genghis Khan was from the work of a French Scholar (sinologist and orientalist) Paul Pelliot. He was most known for his expeditions in Asia and China and discovery of the Dunhuang manuscripts (a shit load of historic, cultural, religious and secular documents) in Dunhuang, China. He had written (and I dont have the citation of that writing but it is not a matter of debate that it is attributed to him) that the Borjigid was the name of Ghengis Kahn's ethnic people. His name in his native tongue was Temujin. Most history books refer to him as Borjigid Temujin or Genghis Kahn. Paul Pelliot who had studied the eastern languages and dialects said that his tribe "Borjigid" literally means blue eyed men.

Furthermore From articles I have read about this topic, Chinese descriptions refer to Temujin describe him as having tall stature and heavy beard. And that Temujin's wife, Bourtai was known in Chinese as 'grey eyed" (I dont have those sources)

After that I am swayed by a description of Temujin's appearance by Harold Lamb, an American historian who wrote a biography Genghis Khan. I never read the book but have seen it cited many times with the following description: "He must have been tall, with high shoulders, his skin a whitish tan. His eyes, set far apart under a sloping forehead, did not slant. And his eyes were green, or blue-grey in the iris, with black pupils. Long reddish-brown hair fell in braids to his back." My belief is that Lamb was familiar with the work of the French scholar Pelliot and other Chinese historians.

After that there is the writings of Abu al-Ghazi Bahadur; He was a Persian scholar from the 1600s who was born in central Asia (uzbek) - I think he was a famous scholar of his time but from what I also learned he had some Jewish ancestry for whatever that is worth. Anyway. Abu al-Ghazi observed that the family of Yesukai who he claimed was the father of Temujin, were known for the fact that their children often had fair complexions, and blue or grey eyes. Again I have never read the original works of Abu al-Ghazi but that is apparently the source.

That's all I got.
 

Iconoclast

Well-known member
Old World Underground
me: Genghis Khan being white with grey eyes has supports from some historians and writers that were his contemporaries or near his time

me: are you saying We Weren't KANGS?


Like me all groups have their "Kangs" narratives including Chinese and Persians who have pushed the Mongols as "wild nomads" and pushed their e stories of where and how Genghis Khan fits into history. Words like "Mongol" and "Tatar" are used in and out of context in different historical time frames. "Mongol" at least until the 17th-18th centuries was less an ethnic than political term.
My first compelling reason or clue for my view on Genghis Khan was from the work of a French Scholar (sinologist and orientalist) Paul Pelliot. He was most known for his expeditions in Asia and China and discovery of the Dunhuang manuscripts (a shit load of historic, cultural, religious and secular documents) in Dunhuang, China. He had written (and I dont have the citation of that writing but it is not a matter of debate that it is attributed to him) that the Borjigid was the name of Ghengis Kahn's ethnic people. His name in his native tongue was Temujin. Most history books refer to him as Borjigid Temujin or Genghis Kahn. Paul Pelliot who had studied the eastern languages and dialects said that his tribe "Borjigid" literally means blue eyed men.

Furthermore From articles I have read about this topic, Chinese descriptions refer to Temujin describe him as having tall stature and heavy beard. And that Temujin's wife, Bourtai was known in Chinese as 'grey eyed" (I dont have those sources)

After that I am swayed by a description of Temujin's appearance by Harold Lamb, an American historian who wrote a biography Genghis Khan. I never read the book but have seen it cited many times with the following description: "He must have been tall, with high shoulders, his skin a whitish tan. His eyes, set far apart under a sloping forehead, did not slant. And his eyes were green, or blue-grey in the iris, with black pupils. Long reddish-brown hair fell in braids to his back." My belief is that Lamb was familiar with the work of the French scholar Pelliot and other Chinese historians.

After that there is the writings of Abu al-Ghazi Bahadur; He was a Persian scholar from the 1600s who was born in central Asia (uzbek) - I think he was a famous scholar of his time but from what I also learned he had some Jewish ancestry for whatever that is worth. Anyway. Abu al-Ghazi observed that the family of Yesukai who he claimed was the father of Temujin, were known for the fact that their children often had fair complexions, and blue or grey eyes. Again I have never read the original works of Abu al-Ghazi but that is apparently the source.

That's all I got.
Genghis Khan's description as a fair white man is consistent with the red-haired white Tarim basin mummies found in central Asia.

I am unironically convinced that we were KANGS all over the world at one time, and our phenotype was predominantly red-haired light eyed and fair skinned (writing as a dark-haired and dark-eyed subhuman, LOL) There are legends and occasional evidence (hotly disputed and universally suppressed and "debunked") of tall white people with this phenotype literally all over the world, including North and South America, Asia minor and major and the South Pacific.

There is actually a documentary I watched some time ago (sorry don't remember the title so I can't link) about a group of new Zealander natives that had inexplicable occasional red hair and fair appearance (quite a bit fairer than their coethnics, still obviously mixed though) that could not be explained by recent European admixture, as these were the "nobler" families and had reliable genealogies that proved no recent European mixture. They had a legend of tall red-headed people coming to the island long ago as refugees on boats after a massive disaster (Atlantis anyone? ) and asking to stay, with the Maoris letting them stay only on condition that they intermarry with them. Gee, I wonder why that was...and talk about genocidal blackmail. It infuriates me to this day.

White genocide has been happening for a very long time, and if we don't put an end to it once and for all NOW, we will just die out and become legends that the resulting mudmen will not even believe. It is really depressing.
 

Iconoclast

Well-known member
Old World Underground
I have to go back and look at all his stuff on elongated skulls -- the ones that keep dissapearing from peruvian and other burial sites. He said he recently had one of his contacts do some dna testing on it and then that result got derailed or something. Maybe his books go deeper into the facts and all and his videos are just teasers for us to buy his shit I dont know
He summarizes some results here - but I wish he would just release the lab reports so that some of /our experts/ can actually interpret them properly. (maybe I just haven't done enough digging, and I am nowhere near an expert, especially on the haplogroups and all that. Maybe @Craniology can dig more into it)
So, meh...some results but not the full thing. I guess I can't blame him for being cagey since the mainstream is just down to suppress and discredit.

The one thing that triggers me in the video is that he handles the skull with his bare hands - no gloves!! No wonder the "mainstream" keeps bleating about inconclusive DNA results and contamination.
 

Craniology

녀-Waffen
Old World Underground
me: Genghis Khan being white with grey eyes has supports from some historians and writers that were his contemporaries or near his time

me: are you saying We Weren't KANGS?


Like me all groups have their "Kangs" narratives including Chinese and Persians who have pushed the Mongols as "wild nomads" and pushed their e stories of where and how Genghis Khan fits into history. Words like "Mongol" and "Tatar" are used in and out of context in different historical time frames. "Mongol" at least until the 17th-18th centuries was less an ethnic than political term.
My first compelling reason or clue for my view on Genghis Khan was from the work of a French Scholar (sinologist and orientalist) Paul Pelliot. He was most known for his expeditions in Asia and China and discovery of the Dunhuang manuscripts (a shit load of historic, cultural, religious and secular documents) in Dunhuang, China. He had written (and I dont have the citation of that writing but it is not a matter of debate that it is attributed to him) that the Borjigid was the name of Ghengis Kahn's ethnic people. His name in his native tongue was Temujin. Most history books refer to him as Borjigid Temujin or Genghis Kahn. Paul Pelliot who had studied the eastern languages and dialects said that his tribe "Borjigid" literally means blue eyed men.

Furthermore From articles I have read about this topic, Chinese descriptions refer to Temujin describe him as having tall stature and heavy beard. And that Temujin's wife, Bourtai was known in Chinese as 'grey eyed" (I dont have those sources)

After that I am swayed by a description of Temujin's appearance by Harold Lamb, an American historian who wrote a biography Genghis Khan. I never read the book but have seen it cited many times with the following description: "He must have been tall, with high shoulders, his skin a whitish tan. His eyes, set far apart under a sloping forehead, did not slant. And his eyes were green, or blue-grey in the iris, with black pupils. Long reddish-brown hair fell in braids to his back." My belief is that Lamb was familiar with the work of the French scholar Pelliot and other Chinese historians.

After that there is the writings of Abu al-Ghazi Bahadur; He was a Persian scholar from the 1600s who was born in central Asia (uzbek) - I think he was a famous scholar of his time but from what I also learned he had some Jewish ancestry for whatever that is worth. Anyway. Abu al-Ghazi observed that the family of Yesukai who he claimed was the father of Temujin, were known for the fact that their children often had fair complexions, and blue or grey eyes. Again I have never read the original works of Abu al-Ghazi but that is apparently the source.

That's all I got.
Dude, not a single one of these sources ever saw the guy.
I searched for this Yesugei guy (his supposed father) and this is what I've found:

There's also a portrait of him done under direction of his grandson in Taiwan and it just looks like another Mongol guy.

Like I've said before, I usually prefer to refrain from this KANG type stuff.
@Iconoclast
The facial bones of the skulls look Injun.
I am also skeptical the link you posted.
I also think he could have contaminated it.
The ideal would be for the petrous bone being removed and examined in a laboratory.
 

pen-meister

Well-known member
Old World Underground
The ideal would be for the petrous bone being removed and examined in a laboratory.
Dude. We have no more control over
-laboratories
-universities
-publishing
-museums
-archeological digs
-testing of relics
-custody of relics
-dna data banks
-tenure at universities
And I could go on
You want luxuries as if they are available. I dont trust google searches and modern resources as much as you do.
 

Craniology

녀-Waffen
Old World Underground
Dude. We have no more control over
-laboratories
-universities
-publishing
-museums
-archeological digs
-testing of relics
-custody of relics
-dna data banks
-tenure at universities
And I could go on
You want luxuries as if they are available
Some of the listed above are public and there's nothing preventing the dude from the link of extracting samples in a professional way (the methodology section of DNA studies is instructive on it) and submitting them to professional labs for sequencing.
There are also sequencing machines that can do it. They are a bit expensive but price is the only thing prohibitive about them.
 
Genghis Khan's description as a fair white man is consistent with the red-haired white Tarim basin mummies found in central Asia.

I am unironically convinced that we were KANGS all over the world at one time, and our phenotype was predominantly red-haired light eyed and fair skinned (writing as a dark-haired and dark-eyed subhuman, LOL) There are legends and occasional evidence (hotly disputed and universally suppressed and "debunked") of tall white people with this phenotype literally all over the world, including North and South America, Asia minor and major and the South Pacific.

There is actually a documentary I watched some time ago (sorry don't remember the title so I can't link) about a group of new Zealander natives that had inexplicable occasional red hair and fair appearance (quite a bit fairer than their coethnics, still obviously mixed though) that could not be explained by recent European admixture, as these were the "nobler" families and had reliable genealogies that proved no recent European mixture. They had a legend of tall red-headed people coming to the island long ago as refugees on boats after a massive disaster (Atlantis anyone? ) and asking to stay, with the Maoris letting them stay only on condition that they intermarry with them. Gee, I wonder why that was...and talk about genocidal blackmail. It infuriates me to this day.

White genocide has been happening for a very long time, and if we don't put an end to it once and for all NOW, we will just die out and become legends that the resulting mudmen will not even believe. It is really depressing.
Red headed New Zealanders

I believe this is the video your speaking of. She (the red headed Maori ) had a family legend of her ancestors coming from Egypt and then Thru South America or the other way around.
 

Iconoclast

Well-known member
Old World Underground
The facial bones of the skulls look Injun.
Interesting, they may already have been mixed with the locals.
It would be even more interesting if you took a look at the elongated skulls in the Caucasus region and found they may be more...Caucasian? I have not seen any pictures of those yet.
 
Last edited:

pen-meister

Well-known member
Old World Underground
Dude, not a single one of these sources ever saw the guy.
I searched for this Yesugei guy (his supposed father) and this is what I've found:

There's also a portrait of him done under direction of his grandson in Taiwan and it just looks like another Mongol guy.

Like I've said before, I usually prefer to refrain from this KANG type stuff.
@Iconoclast
The facial bones of the skulls look Injun.
I am also skeptical the link you posted.
I also think he could have contaminated it.
The ideal would be for the petrous bone being removed and examined in a laboratory.
My problem with you posting those Chinese art renderings of Genghis Khan is that you are just carrying water for the Chinese "we was kangs" narrative. Doing the same thing you criticize me of in the reverse. Figure out which team you're on and start finding stuff for team white. Niggers saying we was kangs is worlds apart from whites saying it. Why place so much trust in a Taiwan guy commissioning a portrait and claiming heredity of Genghis Khan. Who's side are you on?
 

Iconoclast

Well-known member
Old World Underground
Some of the listed above are public and there's nothing preventing the dude from the link of extracting samples in a professional way (the methodology section of DNA studies is instructive on it) and submitting them to professional labs for sequencing.
There are also sequencing machines that can do it. They are a bit expensive but price is the only thing prohibitive about them.
Just FYI the testing was done in two legit university DNA labs with current technology. The labs were not told of the look of the skulls, just sent the samples, so were blinded basically. I also read somewhere that he submitted a tooth as one of the samples, which should conserve the DNA as much as possible, considering it is sealed inside the tooth. Of course, such old DNA is degraded etc, so the conclusions one may draw can be maybe more limited.

Speaking of craniometry though, you did hopefully note the fact that the skulls only had one parietal plate instead of two - a major difference from standard H. Sapiens. Some of them also have that weird bulbous protuberance above the forehead. There also seem to be several types of elongated skulls that you might be able to group together - for ex. the true coneheads vs. the rectangular heads.
 

pen-meister

Well-known member
Old World Underground
Mocking the revisionist white idenitarians who were investigating our roots was started by shills on 4chan. They would mock any white digging into our subverted history. Comparing us to niggers making a false equivalence to the very successful we wuz kangs meme. They flipped it to bully whites from rediscovering our past. Don't fall for it.
 

Iconoclast

Well-known member
Old World Underground
Mocking the revisionist white idenitarians who were investigating our roots was started by shills on 4chan. They would mock any white digging into our subverted history. Comparing us to niggers making a false equivalence to the very successful we wuz kangs meme. They flipped it to bully whites from rediscovering our past. Don't fall for it.
No kidding.

Like I said, I unironically believe we were kangs; unfortunately it seems there was and is a systematic effort to hide, destroy and subvert any evidence that in fact supports this. How many 19th century pictures and newspaper reports of amazing finds that were legit found by archaeologists of the day, turned over to the Smithsonian and then mysteriously disappeared can you read before you just want to pull your hair out?

I mean to this day, any skeleton that is older than the early colonial era in North America is automatically considered "native" and not allowed to be studied, never mind if it is in fact obviously Caucasoid. (Kennewick man would be the most famous. Of course, they eventually concluded he was in fact Indian after all. :cautious: )
 

KangO'DaKrakas

Active member
Genghis Khan's description as a fair white man is consistent with the red-haired white Tarim basin mummies found in central Asia.

I am unironically convinced that we were KANGS all over the world at one time, and our phenotype was predominantly red-haired light eyed and fair skinned (writing as a dark-haired and dark-eyed subhuman, LOL) There are legends and occasional evidence (hotly disputed and universally suppressed and "debunked") of tall white people with this phenotype literally all over the world, including North and South America, Asia minor and major and the South Pacific.

There is actually a documentary I watched some time ago (sorry don't remember the title so I can't link) about a group of new Zealander natives that had inexplicable occasional red hair and fair appearance (quite a bit fairer than their coethnics, still obviously mixed though) that could not be explained by recent European admixture, as these were the "nobler" families and had reliable genealogies that proved no recent European mixture. They had a legend of tall red-headed people coming to the island long ago as refugees on boats after a massive disaster (Atlantis anyone? ) and asking to stay, with the Maoris letting them stay only on condition that they intermarry with them. Gee, I wonder why that was...and talk about genocidal blackmail. It infuriates me to this day.

White genocide has been happening for a very long time, and if we don't put an end to it once and for all NOW, we will just die out and become legends that the resulting mudmen will not even believe. It is really depressing.
Graham Hancock put all this together EXCEPT he could not bring himself to say out loud what he must know, that this world wide civilization were Whites ruling over a world of Blacks and Browns. These Kangs literally build the pyramids all over the world, and kept in touch as they traveled the world by ship.

He hints at it but will not say it out loud. What a coward. Maybe dipping his pecker in the chocolate pudding clouds his vision.
 

Jon_Irenicus

Active member
Old World Underground
I've talked to someone that practiced sex magic before. She said she only did it once, and that it was like looking into their soul while they look into yours.
That's why many cunts are single mothers or become emotional and physical ruin, because they confuse fucking with bonding and choose wrong fucker (who push right buttons to get what they want) for their itchy cunt.
 

Craniology

녀-Waffen
Old World Underground
Interesting, they may already have been mixed with the locals.
I honestly think they are noting but deformed Injuns.

My problem with you posting those Chinese art renderings of Genghis Khan is that you are just carrying water for the Chinese "we was kangs" narrative.
Done under direction of his grandson. A literal eyewitness account...

Figure out which team you're on and start finding stuff for team white.
It's not a competition.
Besides the thousands of years of civilization history in Europe...

Of course, such old DNA is degraded etc, so the conclusions one may draw can be maybe more limited.
It's often the case with old stuff.
Academic teams "amplify" the samples for this kind of purpose.

Speaking of craniometry though, you did hopefully note the fact that the skulls only had one parietal plate instead of two - a major difference from standard H. Sapiens. Some of them also have that weird bulbous protuberance above the forehead. There also seem to be several types of elongated skulls that you might be able to group together - for ex. the true coneheads vs. the rectangular heads.
What you described would be seen as result of intentional deformation, for whatever purposes they may had.

They would mock any white digging into our subverted history.
Our past is in Europe dude...
Thousands and thousands of years.

(Kennewick man would be the most famous. Of course, they eventually concluded he was in fact Indian after all. :cautious: )
Comparing the orbital region on.
Kennewick man:


Paracas:


Modern Injun female:


African, Asian and European, both male and female:


Honestly, I don't think the Paracas were neither alien or white, just a bunch of Injuns with deformed heads.
 
Top