Model Takes Sexy Photos with Teenage Son She is Sex Victimizing (Women are So Ugly, Part II)

Andrew Anglin

Guest


Women are total monsters. Very few men on this earth truly grasp the depth of their base depravity.

Some men know that half of them are having sex with dogs. We’ve seen the threads on 4chan. Still, no one wants to face the fact that many, many single mothers are having sex with their teenage sons.

There is this layer of psychic protection around men’s brains when it comes to seeing how diabolically corrupt women are. The vast majority of men can’t ever see how bad it really is, even when it’s right in front of their faces.

New York Post:

An Australian fitness influencer is hitting back after she was blasted for posing in a thong bikini with her teenage son.

Sophie Guidolin, 33, shared the snap with her 562,000 Instagram followers to celebrate son Kai’s 15th birthday, with the photo showing the blonde beauty cuddling up to the boy with her bare booty on display.

Haters immediately attacked the “inappropriate” image, claiming Kai looked “uncomfortable” and that Guidolin was using her son to feed her “burning addiction to attention.” Other vulgar tolls claimed it appeared as if the proud mama was “banging” her child.

But a defiant Guidolin isn’t backing down: “Having a body is normal, having body parts is normal, it’s not sexualized, it’s nothing shameful, and it’s something I reiterate and drive home here with my boys,” she told the Daily Star in a new interview.

So when they see me in a bikini, they don’t think anything other than ‘Hmm, mom’s tanning, mom’s going to the beach, going for a swim,’” she further explained. “They don’t see me and be like ‘Oooh what a sexy bum you’ve got.’”
If you don’t think single mothers are having sex with their teenage sons, you’re a sheltered baby living in a fantasy world.

It’s the most obvious thing you can look at.



Watch this video she released of her and her son talking about it. They’re in a small chair together, and she’s rubbing her legs against his.


It’s painfully obvious what is going on.

Women can get away with the most heinous crimes against nature because men have this blindness.

Looking at those pictures and that video and saying “oh well, I doubt she would have sex with her own son” is like looking at 25 year olds dying of heart attacks and saying “oh well, the government wouldn’t give us a deadly fake vaccine.”

It’s called “cognitive dissonance.”



You have it.

To the Faggots Who Think Women are Beautiful


Women are just as ugly on the outside as they are on the inside. Their real faces, under their masks, are as naturally repulsive as a mother-son incest abuse scandal.

Yesterday, I wrote that women are very ugly, informing the reader that the illusion of female attractiveness is the result of them wearing cosmetic masks to hide the ugliness underneath.

No one sees anything but their masks.

I said “women are ugly, actually.” People came at me like “haha, are you gay friend, haha, women are so beautiful, right my fellow heterosexuals? They are so beautiful and sexy, haha, I want to kiss their beautiful sexy boobs and do cunnilingus on them, hahaha, am I right, fellow heterosexuals?”

If you think pointing out the fact that women are hiding their abhorrently objectionable faces under a fake mask is “gay,” then you’re a damaged person with mommy syndrome who feels an irrational need to defend women. “Women are beautiful” is one of the most obvious and easily disproved lies ever told.

Here’s the facts, brother:



Let me go very slow for the simp simpletons: the pictures on the right side are attractive. However, those are not the women’s real faces. Their real faces are the very ugly and offensive pictures on the left.

If you think not claiming that the beasts on the left side are “beautiful” makes you gay, you’re dumb and a faggot who doesn’t know anything at all about male attraction mechanisms. You appear to be a repressed homosexual, saying “hey, how about those hot babes my fellow heterosexuals, hahaha, aren’t they such beautiful princesses, haha, right guys?”

Here’s the fact: in history, virtually no one in history went around thinking women were beautiful. (Frankly, if you find anyone saying this in history and look it up, you will find that they are talking about very fresh jailbait. I’m not the bad guy for saying that. You can look it up. And even then, they are just romanticizing sexual urges. Also, there was very, very little of gay “women are so beautiful” talk going on.)

Here’s the truth: historically, men would only get urges to have sex with a woman when she was ovulating. That’s the basic reality. When a woman is ovulating, her face starts to shine. Her lips and cheeks turn red. And then you want to have sex with her, not because she’s so beautiful, but because your body is responding to sex signals.

Moreover, women who are both single and ovulating will typically wear clothing to highlight their fat deposits in their tits and ass. Those fat deposits are not “beautiful.” They are lumps of fat that your brain recognizes as fertility signifiers.

Sorry, you simp faggots: a man wanting to have sex with a woman because he recognizes ovulation signifiers is no different than a dog smelling that a bitch is in heat. It’s the exact same thing. Being sexually aroused by a woman has nothing to do with “beauty.” This is a ridiculous scam that was sold to you as a child when there were no men to protect you from women’s hoaxes. Before yesterday, I thought everyone who had taken baby’s first red pill was aware of this simple fact.

Other women used to call women who wore makeup and exposed their flesh “whores.” Not any more – they’re all in on the “actually, we’re very beautiful” scam.

You people who actually fell for the hoax that women are beautiful are dumb morons and mommy syndrome obsessive Stockholm Syndrome victims. It is a total hoax, no different than any other political hoax from the Jews.

Women are all ugly piles of shit who use makeup to clear up their disgusting skin and to give the signals of fertility. That’s why they always wear lipstick and blush – they are falsely triggering your brain’s systems of recognizing fertility. They do it constantly, appearing always to be ovulating, in order to gain favor with men so they can control them.

Seriously, bro – how do you not know this? Do you have the internet? Isn’t this a basic thing we’ve gone over millions of times on this very website?

We are pretty late in the game here, folks. I’ve been writing about the woman scam for a decade now. How the heck are people coming at me and saying “HEY MAN JUST SO YOU KNOW I’M NOT GAY LIKE YOU OKAY” after I pointed out the obvious fact that women are ugly beasts hiding under makeup? What even is this?

Here’s a protip, fag: if you have a need to constantly signal that you’re a heterosexual by defending women, you’re an abuse victim, and you need to deal with your problems. You need to forgive your mother for abusing you, and let go of that anger you feel. When you release that anger you have towards your mother, you will no longer have that feminine spirit inside of you, and you will no longer feel the need to lash out emotionally in defense of women.

You will also understand that women call you gay as a way to undermine your masculinity, and other men who call you gay for not respecting women are agents of women, acting out because they have been abused, and still associate their identity with their abuser (who also claimed to be their only provider and source of emotional security).

When you let go of mommy, you will also be able to cleanse yourself of any latent homosexual drives you have. And if you are going around defending women and telling people how not gay you are, you do have some form of latent homosexual drives. They probably aren’t actually sex drives – I’m not going to accuse you simps of that, because I haven’t seen evidence of that. But if you are saying “HAHA, ANGLIN, YOU MUST BE GAY IF YOU DENY THE BEAUTY OF WOMEN – I AM SO STRAIGHT AND THINK WOMEN ARE VERY, VERY BEAUTIFUL,” then you are obviously not totally comfortable in your heterosexuality. I hate to be the one to have to tell you this, but it’s just obviously true.

Let me break it down in very simple terms: because your mother abused you and made you think your entire life was dependent on you, you associated your identity with her, and now you have the spirit of a woman in you. Because your psychological and emotional structure is copied after a woman, you necessarily have some form of latent homosexuality, hence the need to constantly prove your heterosexuality.

Think about this: in The Good, The Bad, And the Ugly, did Clint Eastwood feel the need to get up in people’s faces and say “HAHA, ACTUALLY I’M A VERY GOOD GUNFIGHTER, HAHAHA”?



Spoiler: no, he did not do that.

He also didn’t go around telling men who questioned women that they must be gay, nor did he look up pictures of shirtless male models to post in comments sections and say “haha, I don’t like looking at these sexy men because I’m not gay, but I’ll bet you really like this picture of this buff man with his shirt off I just looked up, downloaded to my computer, and then posted in your comments section, because you’re really gay, Anglin.”

Again, I will give you the benefit of the doubt that you don’t actually consciously feel homosexual sex urges, but when you go around calling people gay and talking about how straight you are and defending women, you might as well be screaming “I HAVE VERY SERIOUS UNDERLYING MOMMY ISSUES UP TO AND INCLUDING LATENT HOMOSEXUALITY – I TOTALLY REFUSE TO DEAL WITH THESE ISSUES.”

Those are just the basic facts, friend.

Yes, This is Psychoanalysis


The knee-jerk response to my explanation that women-defenders all have latent homosexual tendencies in their subconscious is to say “oh, so now you’re psychoanalyzing me, bro???”

First, you people denouncing psychoanalysis is very rich – you came at me, psychoanalyzing me, claiming I must be gay or otherwise I would think women are very, very beautiful.

Second, yes, I am absolutely psychoanalyzing you. You have said “women are very beautiful.” As you can see from the above left-side pictures, that is a completely nonsensical statement. Women without their masks look like total piles of dogshit. If some homeless person comes up to me on the street and says “poodles fly south in the dark on the bus to the sleepy village of my fetid fever dreams!”, I am going to psychoanalyze that person by saying they are schizophrenic.

You’ve also added on that I must be gay for refusing to back your bizarre and stupid delusional claims, which compounds the clear disconnect with reality, as it indicates a need to ostracize anyone who refuses to participate in your sick delusion.

If someone comes at me with this kind of unhinged nonsense, I can’t respond logically. I’ve already shown the pictures of these women’s true faces, shown that they are ugly monsters, and you are making a statement that conflicts with a basic and easily observable reality. I have no option of engaging you in rational discussion, any more than I have the option of engaging a raging homeless schizophrenic in discussion. Therefore, I must psychoanalyze you in order to understand where you are coming from.

Yes, there is a phenomenon where people who don’t have an argument will resort to psychoanalysis as an ad hominem in order to try to bypass or shut down the discussion. That is exactly what you people did when you said I was gay for pointing out that women are very ugly. But when you come at me with “actually, women are very beautiful,” how can I respond to that logically? I have already proved for a fact that women are ugly.

When you make nonsense claims aggressively, you leave me no choice but to break down your psychology. I am obligated to understand your psychological drives so I can respond to them, so that my readers can understand what is going on when men come out and make these false claims.

The Most Important Fact You’ll Ever Learn


Women are monsters who feed off of your vital essence. They do that through exploiting your emotions and your sexual drive. That is going to remain true no matter how many times you call me gay for saying it.

You need to wake up, brothers. These hoes are drinking your blood, and you’re opening up your veins to feed them. If you kept all that energy they are sucking inside of your body, you would become a creative and/or financial genius. Women are taking the best parts of who you are to stuff into the bottomless pit of their egos.

As long as you are letting them feed, you are no better than that poor boy whose mother is forcing him to have sex with her.

You deserve better than this, brother.

It’s not your fault.

Continue reading...
 

Gian

Well-known member
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖 💻🥩🥃📖
Destructive Ceremonious Master


Women are total monsters. Very few men on this earth truly grasp the depth of their base depravity.

Some men know that half of them are having sex with dogs. We’ve seen the threads on 4chan. Still, no one wants to face the fact that many, many single mothers are having sex with their teenage sons.

There is this layer of psychic protection around men’s brains when it comes to seeing how diabolically corrupt women are. The vast majority of men can’t ever see how bad it really is, even when it’s right in front of their faces.

New York Post:



If you don’t think single mothers are having sex with their teenage sons, you’re a sheltered baby living in a fantasy world.

It’s the most obvious thing you can look at.



Watch this video she released of her and her son talking about it. They’re in a small chair together, and she’s rubbing her legs against his.


It’s painfully obvious what is going on.

Women can get away with the most heinous crimes against nature because men have this blindness.

Looking at those pictures and that video and saying “oh well, I doubt she would have sex with her own son” is like looking at 25 year olds dying of heart attacks and saying “oh well, the government wouldn’t give us a deadly fake vaccine.”

It’s called “cognitive dissonance.”



You have it.

To the Faggots Who Think Women are Beautiful


Women are just as ugly on the outside as they are on the inside. Their real faces, under their masks, are as naturally repulsive as a mother-son incest abuse scandal.

Yesterday, I wrote that women are very ugly, informing the reader that the illusion of female attractiveness is the result of them wearing cosmetic masks to hide the ugliness underneath.

No one sees anything but their masks.

I said “women are ugly, actually.” People came at me like “haha, are you gay friend, haha, women are so beautiful, right my fellow heterosexuals? They are so beautiful and sexy, haha, I want to kiss their beautiful sexy boobs and do cunnilingus on them, hahaha, am I right, fellow heterosexuals?”

If you think pointing out the fact that women are hiding their abhorrently objectionable faces under a fake mask is “gay,” then you’re a damaged person with mommy syndrome who feels an irrational need to defend women. “Women are beautiful” is one of the most obvious and easily disproved lies ever told.

Here’s the facts, brother:



Let me go very slow for the simp simpletons: the pictures on the right side are attractive. However, those are not the women’s real faces. Their real faces are the very ugly and offensive pictures on the left.

If you think not claiming that the beasts on the left side are “beautiful” makes you gay, you’re dumb and a faggot who doesn’t know anything at all about male attraction mechanisms. You appear to be a repressed homosexual, saying “hey, how about those hot babes my fellow heterosexuals, hahaha, aren’t they such beautiful princesses, haha, right guys?”

Here’s the fact: in history, virtually no one in history went around thinking women were beautiful. (Frankly, if you find anyone saying this in history and look it up, you will find that they are talking about very fresh jailbait. I’m not the bad guy for saying that. You can look it up. And even then, they are just romanticizing sexual urges. Also, there was very, very little of gay “women are so beautiful” talk going on.)

Here’s the truth: historically, men would only get urges to have sex with a woman when she was ovulating. That’s the basic reality. When a woman is ovulating, her face starts to shine. Her lips and cheeks turn red. And then you want to have sex with her, not because she’s so beautiful, but because your body is responding to sex signals.

Moreover, women who are both single and ovulating will typically wear clothing to highlight their fat deposits in their tits and ass. Those fat deposits are not “beautiful.” They are lumps of fat that your brain recognizes as fertility signifiers.

Sorry, you simp faggots: a man wanting to have sex with a woman because he recognizes ovulation signifiers is no different than a dog smelling that a bitch is in heat. It’s the exact same thing. Being sexually aroused by a woman has nothing to do with “beauty.” This is a ridiculous scam that was sold to you as a child when there were no men to protect you from women’s hoaxes. Before yesterday, I thought everyone who had taken baby’s first red pill was aware of this simple fact.

Other women used to call women who wore makeup and exposed their flesh “whores.” Not any more – they’re all in on the “actually, we’re very beautiful” scam.

You people who actually fell for the hoax that women are beautiful are dumb morons and mommy syndrome obsessive Stockholm Syndrome victims. It is a total hoax, no different than any other political hoax from the Jews.

Women are all ugly piles of shit who use makeup to clear up their disgusting skin and to give the signals of fertility. That’s why they always wear lipstick and blush – they are falsely triggering your brain’s systems of recognizing fertility. They do it constantly, appearing always to be ovulating, in order to gain favor with men so they can control them.

Seriously, bro – how do you not know this? Do you have the internet? Isn’t this a basic thing we’ve gone over millions of times on this very website?

We are pretty late in the game here, folks. I’ve been writing about the woman scam for a decade now. How the heck are people coming at me and saying “HEY MAN JUST SO YOU KNOW I’M NOT GAY LIKE YOU OKAY” after I pointed out the obvious fact that women are ugly beasts hiding under makeup? What even is this?

Here’s a protip, fag: if you have a need to constantly signal that you’re a heterosexual by defending women, you’re an abuse victim, and you need to deal with your problems. You need to forgive your mother for abusing you, and let go of that anger you feel. When you release that anger you have towards your mother, you will no longer have that feminine spirit inside of you, and you will no longer feel the need to lash out emotionally in defense of women.

You will also understand that women call you gay as a way to undermine your masculinity, and other men who call you gay for not respecting women are agents of women, acting out because they have been abused, and still associate their identity with their abuser (who also claimed to be their only provider and source of emotional security).

When you let go of mommy, you will also be able to cleanse yourself of any latent homosexual drives you have. And if you are going around defending women and telling people how not gay you are, you do have some form of latent homosexual drives. They probably aren’t actually sex drives – I’m not going to accuse you simps of that, because I haven’t seen evidence of that. But if you are saying “HAHA, ANGLIN, YOU MUST BE GAY IF YOU DENY THE BEAUTY OF WOMEN – I AM SO STRAIGHT AND THINK WOMEN ARE VERY, VERY BEAUTIFUL,” then you are obviously not totally comfortable in your heterosexuality. I hate to be the one to have to tell you this, but it’s just obviously true.

Let me break it down in very simple terms: because your mother abused you and made you think your entire life was dependent on you, you associated your identity with her, and now you have the spirit of a woman in you. Because your psychological and emotional structure is copied after a woman, you necessarily have some form of latent homosexuality, hence the need to constantly prove your heterosexuality.

Think about this: in The Good, The Bad, And the Ugly, did Clint Eastwood feel the need to get up in people’s faces and say “HAHA, ACTUALLY I’M A VERY GOOD GUNFIGHTER, HAHAHA”?



Spoiler: no, he did not do that.

He also didn’t go around telling men who questioned women that they must be gay, nor did he look up pictures of shirtless male models to post in comments sections and say “haha, I don’t like looking at these sexy men because I’m not gay, but I’ll bet you really like this picture of this buff man with his shirt off I just looked up, downloaded to my computer, and then posted in your comments section, because you’re really gay, Anglin.”

Again, I will give you the benefit of the doubt that you don’t actually consciously feel homosexual sex urges, but when you go around calling people gay and talking about how straight you are and defending women, you might as well be screaming “I HAVE VERY SERIOUS UNDERLYING MOMMY ISSUES UP TO AND INCLUDING LATENT HOMOSEXUALITY – I TOTALLY REFUSE TO DEAL WITH THESE ISSUES.”

Those are just the basic facts, friend.

Yes, This is Psychoanalysis


The knee-jerk response to my explanation that women-defenders all have latent homosexual tendencies in their subconscious is to say “oh, so now you’re psychoanalyzing me, bro???”

First, you people denouncing psychoanalysis is very rich – you came at me, psychoanalyzing me, claiming I must be gay or otherwise I would think women are very, very beautiful.

Second, yes, I am absolutely psychoanalyzing you. You have said “women are very beautiful.” As you can see from the above left-side pictures, that is a completely nonsensical statement. Women without their masks look like total piles of dogshit. If some homeless person comes up to me on the street and says “poodles fly south in the dark on the bus to the sleepy village of my fetid fever dreams!”, I am going to psychoanalyze that person by saying they are schizophrenic.

You’ve also added on that I must be gay for refusing to back your bizarre and stupid delusional claims, which compounds the clear disconnect with reality, as it indicates a need to ostracize anyone who refuses to participate in your sick delusion.

If someone comes at me with this kind of unhinged nonsense, I can’t respond logically. I’ve already shown the pictures of these women’s true faces, shown that they are ugly monsters, and you are making a statement that conflicts with a basic and easily observable reality. I have no option of engaging you in rational discussion, any more than I have the option of engaging a raging homeless schizophrenic in discussion. Therefore, I must psychoanalyze you in order to understand where you are coming from.

Yes, there is a phenomenon where people who don’t have an argument will resort to psychoanalysis as an ad hominem in order to try to bypass or shut down the discussion. That is exactly what you people did when you said I was gay for pointing out that women are very ugly. But when you come at me with “actually, women are very beautiful,” how can I respond to that logically? I have already proved for a fact that women are ugly.

When you make nonsense claims aggressively, you leave me no choice but to break down your psychology. I am obligated to understand your psychological drives so I can respond to them, so that my readers can understand what is going on when men come out and make these false claims.

The Most Important Fact You’ll Ever Learn


Women are monsters who feed off of your vital essence. They do that through exploiting your emotions and your sexual drive. That is going to remain true no matter how many times you call me gay for saying it.

You need to wake up, brothers. These hoes are drinking your blood, and you’re opening up your veins to feed them. If you kept all that energy they are sucking inside of your body, you would become a creative and/or financial genius. Women are taking the best parts of who you are to stuff into the bottomless pit of their egos.

As long as you are letting them feed, you are no better than that poor boy whose mother is forcing him to have sex with her.

You deserve better than this, brother.

It’s not your fault.

Continue reading...
What a predator she is, with her son.

And yes, it’s all a farce: makeup and cosmetic surgery to conceal the ugly truth.

Kristen Stewart is a complete fabrication; she’s always made me livid: Underneath, just a common dyke:
28ABF6F8-8E16-4449-A195-45883AC7F483.png
C6DF7ED8-04BA-49AA-8FE4-03590A39CE5D.jpeg
 

CMcGillicutty

Well-known member
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖 💻
Some men know that half of them are having sex with dogs. We’ve seen the threads on 4chan.
You don't even have to go to 4chan for this stuff. It's in the tabloids like every other month.


But there's definitely something weird going on here. This woman is trash. She's 33 and she's got a 15 year old son, that alone is not problematic. We would love for more 33 year old white women to have 15 year old sons. The problem is that she is imbueing her son with all this sexually inappropriate energy. And when you think about how old she was when she would have started putting out, in order to have a 15 year old at 33, it's obvious there's some disgusting complex where the son is acting as a surrogate for his father, and likely dozens of other guys. I don't even know that she's fucking him, but if you looked at those photos without context beforehand, would you assume that was a mother and son, or a hooker and some college kid? This is as bad as the Ashley Biden shower diary.
 

zz_xx_zz_x

Well-known member
Cave Beast
⏰☕
The MAJORITY of women are ugly is my observation. When I was in the Philippines in the 90's, they thought the only women that wore make up were whores, so most women never wore makeup. Only a very rare few actually had real beauty and those girls were young, innocent, and treated you like a King. They were the kind that went to Church, that had a good soul that would shine outward.
When I came back to the US I thought these women here all look like clowns. I wondered why on earth these guys were settling for the women they were with.
Andrew Anglin is right with some rare exceptions to the rule.
 

TypicalTricks

huge misogynerd
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿
I wonder how many of those godawful rashes and zits are ironically the result of all the makeup they're always caking their faces in.

Cosmetics are expensive, dishonest, and bad for your skin. Probably bad for your overall health, too. Should be banned ASAP.
 

buzzbuzz

Well-known member
Old World Underground
⏰☕🚬
That picture of her sharing the chair with her son is like, absurd. What kind of mother does that? I thank God every day that I was raised by a mother and father that didn't divorce.

Honestly Anglin, your discussion about the history of clothing and modesty in previous articles really opened my eyes. There's a reason why Muslims put their bitches in ugly tents. When all you have is your eyes, you can't demand attention from men in the same way. When men are unburdened by female attention seeking, they tend to be a lot more focused. White Christians never went as far as the burkha, but we still put women in long dresses that covered their legs and arms, and things were a lot better back then.

As a kid, the greatest generation men who were against things that seemed normal to me, like women wearing pants, used to seem weirdly backward to me, but nowadays I realized how right they were. Women should not be allowed to show their legs. The fact that we historically let them show their faces was probably too kind.
 

Enigma

Rashist
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
Escaped True Master
I wonder how many of those godawful rashes and zits are ironically the result of all the makeup they're always caking their faces in.

Cosmetics are expensive, dishonest, and bad for your skin. Probably bad for your overall health, too. Should be banned ASAP.
Also suppose that cosmetics dry the skin out and cause inflammation so you always need more cosmetics and become a life long customer.
 

ItsAlwaysSomething

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
She wasn't. Mary is mostly an annoying nuisance in the Gospels. Crying about Jesus going off to the Temple and saying that Joseph is his dad. Bothering him at a wedding. He didn't even call her mom in that part.
Let us not forget the time where she interrupted one of Jesus's sermons.



Despite the miraculous events surrounding His birth, Mary still did not fully grasp her firstborn Son’s true purpose. Matthew 12:46–48, the next mention of Mary after the wedding in Cana, recounts an incident when she and Jesus’ brothers summoned Him as He was preaching. His response to their interruption indicates that He understood that even those closest to Him did not yet understand or believe in Him as Israel’s Messiah. In John 7:2–5, Jesus’ brothers tried again to dissuade Him from what God had sent Him to do. This may also indicate that Mary continued to be confused about His role in coming to earth.
 

FvckingJoggerboos

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
The pics on the right look like drag queens. I don't find anything attractive about the heavy clown makeup women do these days. A few of the girls on the left have some natural beauty but obvious acne issues. Most people, men and women are simply ugly. We clearly need to use genetic engineering to repair the aesthetics of the human race.

I suspect China will do it first and will transform their population into Aryan uber mensch. Same with the Japanese although they will transform themselves into an anime version of Aryan uber mensch with giant anime eyes. The West will devolve into an ugly Kalergi mutt race because "racism". So ironically the future of the West lies in the East.
 

V.I

Thanks greatest ally for this incredible bargain
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
What’s interesting is regardless of where you travel, women’s manipulation techniques are exactly the same. It’s not like women all attended a school on how to trick men into doing their bidding. Like a baby horse foal is born knowing how to walk, a jew is born knowing how to scam and subvert, a woman is born to manipulate men. In fact, if you think of the evolutionary pressures it makes perfect sense.

There is no such thing as a good woman nor a good jew. You might find a mutant that has a genetic load deformed psychology, but that’s merely the exception that proves the rule.
 

Hordak

Active member
Old World Underground
Coming out of my multi-year retirement to say that Anglin’s commentary on the WQ is his most valuable work. Everything he says about male/female dynamics is true, and white women are definitely a depraved species with no internal moral guide or code whatsoever. Which is why we kept them under our boots for centuries…it was a necessity for the continuity of our race and civilizations. Less than 100 years after giving them full rights, our millennias-long civilization is on the ropes.

I’m a firm believer that 99% percent of the psychological problems (and thus most physical problems by extension) in men can be successfully traced back to decisions and actions made by a woman, most likely their mother, who should have never been given the power to make those decisions or actions in the first place. And that includes who she chose to father her children.

Once female nature has been understood, you will never unsee or misunderstand it. Which leads me to believe that men who are still simping in 2022 are incapable of actually seeing or understanding it at all.

Did anybody forget the legions of scantily clad white whores pouring out into the streets in support of the 2020 nigger uprising just two short years ago? Because I didn’t and I never will.
 

TheAvenger

Love Your Fate :"Amor Fati"
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
I think you were very restrained and controlled in your exposition of female physical and psychological warfare.

Since the beginning, females have been waging an undeclared war against the creator and males in general.

Indians painted their faces with crazy splotches of color and designs and danced around like lunatics to prepare to battle their enemies ... They call that War Paint, now we call that Beauty? WTF
 

Blas

Alabaster skin defender
Old World Underground
⏰☕
Mr. Anglin, I believe you took @Rocky from the Backwoods 's joke too seriously.
I think he was just being silly and not calling you gay.

Also, while I'm sceptic of the beauty of any woman wearing make up, there are tons of pretty healthy 15-22 year old natural women in southern Europe beaches not wearing make up.

Furthermore, I would totally bang this girl you showed in the OP without make up (may be because I'm in a no fap period but still) :

 
Last edited:

V.I

Thanks greatest ally for this incredible bargain
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
Coming out of my multi-year retirement to say that Anglin’s commentary on the WQ is his most valuable work. Everything he says about male/female dynamics is true, and white women are definitely a depraved species with no internal moral guide or code whatsoever. Which is why we kept them under our boots for centuries…it was a necessity for the continuity of our race and civilizations. Less than 100 years after giving them full rights, our millennias-long civilization is on the ropes.

I’m a firm believer that 99% percent of the psychological problems (and thus most physical problems by extension) in men can be successfully traced back to decisions and actions made by a woman, most likely their mother, who should have never been given the power to make those decisions or actions in the first place. And that includes who she chose to father her children.

Once female nature has been understood, you will never unsee or misunderstand it. Which leads me to believe that men who are still simping in 2022 are incapable of actually seeing or understanding it at all.

Did anybody forget the legions of scantily clad white whores pouring out into the streets in support of the 2020 nigger uprising just two short years ago? Because I didn’t and I never will.
Yeah, some people thought yesterday’s article was a hyperbolic troll piece designed to drive weekend reader engagement. It was more a short screed that didn’t really separate the makeup/surgery genetic fraud from male sexual impulses, so some people ran with that ambiguity and caused a lolcow trainwreak in the comments section. Ironically, it was more fun to publish the rough-around-the-edges piece first and clarify later. Not sure if by design or accident, but if by design he’s getting good at anticipating reader reaction.
 

TypicalTricks

huge misogynerd
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿
Also suppose that cosmetics dry the skin out and cause inflammation so you always need more cosmetics and become a life long customer.
And it inevitably becomes a race to the bottom. If some women wear makeup and others don't, the former will win (the attention of men for sex, money, family, whatever). It's not the kind of problem you can solve by convincing individual women to stop wearing it. It has to be enforced by either the law or strict social norms.

Imagine if they legalized doping in sports. Within a few years, 99% of high level competitors would be juicing, because the ones who didn't for health or moral reasons would be outcompeted and ignored.
 
Top