Media: People Who Refuse Coronavirus Vaccine are Responsible for Endless Lockdown

Elvis Dunderhoff

Guest


Totally benign and mysterious health-promoting liquid. Have faith in Science.

As predicted, continued lockdowns are to be blamed on people who refuse the vaxx.

The Guardian:

Australia is unlikely to achieve herd immunity with current levels of Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy and the higher infectiousness of new variants, modelling from Melbourne medical research laboratory the Burnet Institute has found.

The scenarios modelled by researchers assume a vaccine rollout speed of either 150,000 or 250,000 doses per week, and that on detection of the first case, symptomatic testing increases, isolation of positive cases continues, masks become recommended but not mandatory, and contact tracing continues for up to 250 diagnoses per day.

The projections represent hypothetical near-worst-case scenarios, and model outbreaks that occur once Australia is Covid-free, without lockdowns and other public health measures in place.

The models reveal that public health initiatives will remain vital even in vaccinated populations and that without those measures, “thousands of Victorians would be hospitalised and die if an initially small outbreak was left to spread through the community unchecked,” the research published on Friday says.

Burnet Institute’s head of modelling, Dr Nick Scott, said public health measures, such as lockdowns, social distancing, mask wearing and use of QR codes, would need to continue to prevent a projected 4,800 deaths in Victoria alone within 12 months if the virus were to spread without a public health response beyond vaccination.

“Those who are vaccinated would be protected and may only experience mild or no symptoms,” Scott said. “But among those not vaccinated – possibly up to 30 per cent of the community – we could see a large number of hospitalisations and deaths, as well as many cases of ‘long Covid’.”
If the vaxxed are really protected, then why not just let the unvaxxed take their chances?

I would be comfortable with a policy that people who are unvaxxed are not allowed to go to the hospital if they contract this supposed virus.

Why is the government the mommy?

If the government is allowed to lock people down for their own good, of course, they are also logically allowed to force vaccinate them for their own good.

From the beginning, the problem with all of this was the assertion that the government has a right to protect you from your own choices.

Continue reading...
 

Poundland Mugabe

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
I would be comfortable with a policy that people who are unvaxxed are not allowed to go to the hospital if they contract this supposed virus.
Should we also then start denying fatties treatment for high blood pressure and diabetes? How about motorcyclists with broken legs? Smokers with throat cancer? Heavy drinkers with liver troubles? All self inflicted in the way an unvaxxed covid patient could be defined.

Also, there is no data anybody in the world can present to me right now that shows the covid vaccines work and are preventing infections and deaths.
 

Boing

Light From Darkness
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
would be comfortable with a policy that people who are unvaxxed are not allowed to go to the hospital if they contract this supposed virus.
Huh? I Wouldnt. If someone decides to remain unvaxxed, why should they be denied hospital treatment if they do require it and contract the covid? Unvaxxed people are usually forced to pay thousands a year in taxes to support medical systems & treatment whether or not they require the service. This sounds most contradictory and now looks like youre advocating forced vaccinations, which is the ultimate 'govt playing mommy'.
 

anti-barabas-ite

Work stuff through in your brain...UNVAXXED
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
Escaped True Master
Should we also then start denying fatties treatment for high blood pressure and diabetes? How about motorcyclists with broken legs? Smokers with throat cancer? Heavy drinkers with liver troubles? All self inflicted in the way an unvaxxed covid patient could be defined.

Also, there is no data anybody in the world can present to me right now that shows the covid vaccines work and are preventing infections and deaths.
I think this is a coming part and parcel of this vax /insurance resetting.

your social scoring system will be tied to your lifestyle and the choices you make.

right now these are a bit in the abstract. you are allowed to make bad choices and have the whole of society pay for them, granted you will maybe pay a far steeper price in pain and suffering for a obeseity ladden life, but its a burden the whole nieghborhood pays for in higher healthcare and parking lot hogging of close in spots at wallmart.

a techoncratic model has a system attached to you that number one, won't let you buy crap to make you fat because your bitcoin/fedcoin (same thing) algorithm won't allow it, plus the GMO/Hybrid foods won't allow for real oreos...or you EBT UBI won't allow the block chained purchase.

your new smart toilet is going to analyze your poop in the morning and determine if your refrigerator door will open or your toaster will be allowed to turn on.
It will sense if your stool or urine has a comminicable disease and lock the exit from your hive cube.

in a more just and verdant society, all the resources of the world belong to humanity equally, you really don't have a right to be a glutton or a sloth or envious or prideful...

bad health outcomes are not allowed, along with other degenerate behaviors, all monitored by the blockchained state.

eugenics never did go away they just morphed into green revolutionaries and jew overlords.

to fanciful? too outlandish? its already happening, the implimentation will take some time and growing pains.

be aware and wary.
 
Last edited:

Angryguy

Same angryguy new look
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻
Agree 100% with what you said. Not sure what Elvis meant but if given the choice of forced vaccine or opt out of medical i would take the opt out option. In the short term i wouldn't care about my portion of taxes. But in the long term yes, if I am not good enough to be looked after my money isn't good enough and let these fatties pay for it. I am 100% pissed that they throw this card at people while ignoring their behavior. Before covid someone told me I shouldn't be covered for medical because I don't like wearing a helmet when I bike and I went through your points.
Should we also then start denying fatties treatment for high blood pressure and diabetes? How about motorcyclists with broken legs? Smokers with throat cancer? Heavy drinkers with liver troubles? All self inflicted in the way an unvaxxed covid patient could be defined.

Also, there is no data anybody in the world can present to me right now that shows the covid vaccines work and are preventing infections and deaths.
 

CharlesWorthing

🙊Dog Faced🙊🦴🦴🙊Pony Soldier🙊
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻
This woman, Beverley Turner, got brow beaten on British TV by a Jew (an Epstein) for questioning the Holocaust *ahem* Coronavirus narrative.

 

anti-barabas-ite

Work stuff through in your brain...UNVAXXED
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
Escaped True Master
opt out of medical
You can opt out but supreme court makes you still pay a tax for not doing medical insurance.

7.2 ruling today to uphold aca.

The trump supremes ride again only gorsich dissented with one other...
 

Aquafina

I DON'T KNOW WHAT I SAID I DON'T REMEMBER
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖 💻
The anti-vaxxers need to stop being so selfish, global submission is mandatory.
 

Mann Vs. Machine

O.P. (Original Pranksta)
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿
vax2.jpg
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

vraid4.jpg
 
Last edited:
Top