Media Claims Alex Jones Will Have to Pay $45.2 Million Extra to Sandy Hoaxsters

Andrew Anglin

Guest


Previously: #FreeAlexJones #SandyHoax #TheJuiceIsLoose #CrisisActors: AJ Only Ordered to Pay $4.2 Million

The Sandy Hoax people over at CNN and the New York Times are claiming that Alex Jones is going to have to pay $45.2 million in extra “punitive damages” to the Sandy Hoaxster crisis actors.

They are eventually admitting that these kinds of damages are illegal in Texas – but not until the 12th paragraph.

New York Times:

A Texas jury ordered the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones on Friday to pay the parents of a child killed in the 2012 Sandy Hook school shooting $45.2 million in punitive damages for spreading the lie that they helped stage the massacre.

The jury announced its decision a day after awarding the parents more than $4 million in compensatory damages and after testimony on Friday that Mr. Jones and Free Speech Systems, the parent company of his misinformation-peddling media outlet, Infowars, were worth $135 million to $270 million.
I think Alex isn’t as broke as he claims, but this is just retarded.

Mr. Jones was found liable last year for defaming the victims’ families while spreading bogus theories that the shooting had been part of a government plot to confiscate Americans’ firearms and that the victims’ families had been complicit in the scheme.

This week’s trial was the first of three to determine how much Mr. Jones owes the families for the suffering he has caused, and the size of the award is sure to be contested. Jurors deliberated for about four hours before reaching Friday’s verdict.

Compensatory damages are based on proven harm, loss or injury, and are often calculated based on the fair market value of damaged property, lost wages and expenses, according to Cornell Law School.
This was absolute bullshit. How did they lose money because Alex called them out?

Did they lose acting gigs, because people would have noticed that they were fake shooting parents?

Punitive damages are intended to punish especially harmful behavior and tend to be granted at the court’s discretion, and are sometimes many multiples of a compensatory award.

The case decided this week was brought by Scarlett Lewis and Neil Heslin, whose 6-year-old son, Jesse Lewis, died in the attack in Newtown, Conn. It was the first to arise from several lawsuits filed by victims’ parents in 2018.
Did you see this bitch on stand?

‘My son existed’ — Scarlett Lewis, whose 6-year-old son Jesse was killed in the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, confronted conspiracy theorist Alex Jones in court about the lies he spread around the massacre pic.twitter.com/7Idw6G5dZS

— NowThis (@nowthisnews) August 3, 2022

The only way someone would claim that is not “acting” is if they were afraid of getting sued by Jews. It is simply not believable that this woman is really tore up about her dead son. She is reading a scripted statement, without any emotion.

“This is an important day for truth, for justice, and I couldn’t be happier,” Ms. Lewis said in the courtroom after the verdict.

Before the jurors began deliberating about the punitive damages, Wesley Todd Ball, a lawyer for the family, told the jury that it had “the ability to send a message for everyone in this country and perhaps this world to hear.”

“We ask that you send a very, very simple message, and that is: Stop Alex Jones,” he said. “Stop the monetization of misinformation and lies. Please.”
Yeah, see – it’s about alleged dead kids and their grieving parents. Oh no, actually it’s about “misinformation,” which wasn’t even a thing in 2012 when Alex said this stuff.

Mr. Ball had asked the jury for punitive damages of about $146 million, in addition to the $4 million in compensatory damages awarded on Thursday.

How much Mr. Jones will actually have to pay in punitive damages is certain to be the subject of further litigation. Texas law caps punitive damages at two times the compensatory damages plus $750,000.

But Mark Bankston, a lawyer for Mr. Heslin and Ms. Lewis, told reporters on Thursday that the issue is likely to end up before the Texas Supreme Court, and legal experts said there were disagreements about the constitutionality of the cap.
This has already been challenged repeatedly. Everyone was saying when the $4 million ruling came through that Alex’s really challenge was the punitive damages, but I looked this up. You can’t charge someone more than $750,000 in punitive damages. If the jury wanted this in the tens or hundreds of millions, they would have to have done that in the initial compensatory damages.

Maybe they will overturn these Texas protections – who knows. That’s possible.

The slime bag attorney – who himself appears to be an actor – is saying that the various groups of actors will be “dividing up the corpse” of Infowars.

Attorney who just won his lawsuit vs Alex Jones:

“There is going to be a large set of plaintiffs dividing up the corpse of Infowars. … That could get very, very dangerous for Mr. Jones, because there is going to be a new level of financial scrutiny.” pic.twitter.com/6EzLQXcLwS

— Bill Grueskin (@BGrueskin) August 6, 2022

Eventually, Alex Jones will be destroyed one way or the other.

He still has non-Texas trials where judgements are going to be issued.

This is just total evil, what they are doing to Alex, saying openly “well, we can’t refute what you’re saying, so we’re just going to totally destroy your life.” People need to understand: that is how these people think, those are the rules we are all operating under in this stupid, fake, hoax country we live in.

This man must be protected at all costs We love Alex Jones! pic.twitter.com/zpzve2DAuI

— Slow Cheetah
🎶
(@SlowCheetah30) August 6, 2022
Continue reading...
 

Lauri Niskanen

WTF *this* time
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓
This was absolute bullshit. How did they lose money because Alex called them out?

Did they lose acting gigs, because people would have noticed that they were fake shooting parents?
Hilarious!

Yeah, see – it’s about alleged dead kids and their grieving parents. Oh no, actually it’s about “misinformation,” which wasn’t even a thing in 2012 when Alex said this stuff.
I just heard on the radio news that our mind police wants to criminalize "disinformation". It's funny how this infowar has devolved into childish "nuh-uh you lie you liar" games.

EDIT: They specifically want to criminalize shilling for foreign countries' interests. Which is implicitly antisemitic because that would apply to all jews who always shill for Israeli interests. That's one Uno card that will get tonnes of playtime.

1659739117066220.jpg
 
Last edited:

Caligula

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓
That cocky good goy should know things could get “real interesting for him” if things go further south in the US. Many of these lawyers might find that there’s more than money on the line
 

CharlesWorthing

Unsolicited advice giver
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
How can there be damages when the sandy hoaxers made millions from donations?

If Jones was smart he would have demanded their accounts and exposed the uncomfortable truth about how they are cashing in on the supposed death of kids.
 

Caligula

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓
Zero sympathy for Alex Jones. You're not actually allowed to profit off of defamation, as CNN and WaPo found out when they defamed Nick Sandmann.

I agree with this guy:

View attachment 112511
He didn’t defame anyone…it’s a major public event. The sandyhook parents made themselves political players in the same way that David Hogg made himself a political figure. These shootings are becoming more and more suspect and people are wising up to things. Further….who cares if Alex doesn’t babble on about Jews and spouts Q level nonsense.90% of the time he’s pretty accurate and a breath of fresh air. He literally built an empire saying things that obviously the mainstream media and government hate. He’s a strong male and I don’t like seeing jackels attack a lion
 

Groznyj Kraj

Well-known member
Old World Underground
>This has already been challenged repeatedly. Everyone was saying when the $4 million ruling came through that Alex’s really challenge was the punitive damages, but I looked this up. You can’t charge someone more than $750,000 in punitive damages.

According to the cited article, at least, the punitive damages cap of 2x compensatory + 750k would mean $8,750,000 in addition to the 4,000,000 compensatory. As for what's being compensated, I guess lawyer fees or whatever.
At any rate, the jews aren't going to let AJ go just like that.
 

JR_Rustler_III

🇰🇷 Gookwaffen 🇯🇵
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖 💻🥩
Destructive Ceremonious Master
Zero sympathy for Alex Jones. You're not actually allowed to profit off of defamation, as CNN and WaPo found out when they defamed Nick Sandmann.
But the problem is, what Alex Jones did didn't meet the legal standard for slander or libel. That's because from Day One the Sandy Hoax parents made themselves into public figures by their extensive and voluntary cooperation with the media, and as a result have profited considerably from Sandy Hoax over the last decade. By the time Alex Jones put them under a microscope, they had been public figures for years, which under US law essentially immunized Jones. There's a reason why the judge in this trial took the legally-unprecedented step of slapping a default judgment on him, because there's simply no case to be made against him, so she was forced to take extraordinary and outrageous measures. Nick Sandman, on the other hand, never made himself into a public figure--instead, the media imposed that upon him, for the explicit purpose of defaming him. If Kyle Rittenhouse hadn't fallen into the grip of his current handler (an ex-Navy SEAL and obvious FBI/CIA/ADL asset) and gotten some actual good legal advice, he would have avoided exploiting the media for personal benefit, so as to not jeopardize his future ability to sue for defamation. But, that's a different story.

You can criticize Alex Jones for a lot of things, not the least of which is turning himself into a circus act, but he's been proven right enough times that whatever misinformation he's put out there is outweighed by the good work he's done. I suppose you could make an argument that Alex Jones is a CIA "limited hangout" disinformation psyop, or he's part of a giant kayfabe of some sort, but the longer this goes on, the more unlikely that seems.
 
Last edited:

JR_Rustler_III

🇰🇷 Gookwaffen 🇯🇵
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖 💻🥩
Destructive Ceremonious Master
How can there be damages when the sandy hoaxers made millions from donations?
Imagine being the kind of parent who spends an entire decade working hand-in-hand with the media to ruthlessly exploit their child's death in order to make millions and millions of dollars.

Or, imagine you're just being paid to play a role in a giant made-for-TV psyop.

Hard to figure which is more evil.
 

Dr Livci

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
Escaped True Master
IMO this is basically just exhibit 6 trillion of what an unserious country the US is now. There is no denying that Hunter Biden is the most sympathetic and masculine figure we have as far as people associated with our overlords is concerned but let’s just go ahead and pretend the jews are serious about the need to scrupulously enforce the letter of the law. They are so concerned that perhaps Sandy Hoaxers lost acting gigs and chances to win the lottery I guess because of AJ that he needs to pay them all 10s of millions of dollars. Yet we do have pretty solid reason to believe that Hunter in his capacity as a member of his dads crime empire was acting as a go between Joe and at least the Ukrainians and maybe some Chinese.

Now these NPC drones and media kikes scream “no no there was nothing there with all this Biden crime family stuff, that’s been fact checked and debunked but we fact checked and confirmed that AJ ruined all these Sandy Hoax people’s chances to star in Marvel and Star Wars movies”. This is just surreal in its absurdity because it’s literally the same jews saying there is no reason to look into the Biden stuff who are saying it’s totally reasonable to just assume that these hoax people would be millionaires if not specifically for AJ. So why can’t Anglin or Jones say if not for the jews they would also have way more money? Why can’t the January 6 stormers say if not for jews and FBI they would also have more money?

It’s like when you have solid evidence of legit corruption what happens is the jews say the people engaging in the corruption are actually victims that need to be protected and anyone talking about it should be defamed and have their lives ruined. Your an insurrectionist, White Supremacist, homophobia peddling conspiracy disinformationist terrorist domestic insurgent Russian Bot etc etc. The jews have to name you so that everyone knows how dangerous you are and nobody should ever hire you or let you have a bank account. Meanwhile if you so much as suggest that someone the jews like is doing a hoax than you have to give that person trillions of dollars because maybe they didn’t become NFL stars or catch the role to play Bilbo Baggins in the upcoming LoR remake where everyone is a gay androgynous African.
 

Poundland Mugabe

I hate people.
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
I watched the full two and a half hour "we need to talk about Sandy Hook" documentary yesterday. This is the first and only exposure to any information I've had about this event, which is obviously not what it is presented as.
Several things stood out for me such as the police car video not tallying with documented police versions of the event timelines.
The chopper footage of the firehouse with the people going in the front and then coming out the back, the guy in yellow whose random movements were so obviously absurd that he had to be reprimanded by another simulation participator.
Then there is Gene (((((((((Rosen))))))))) (who others have correctly compared with the lunatic brother of the alleged Las Vegas shooter) who appears as the jewey wierdo supposedly the hero savior of random children that magically appeared outside his house at a time when he is shown ambling about outside the firehouse in the chopper footage.

This whole event is obviously a carefully choreographed psy-op that had many moving parts and many participants whose knowledge of that days events ranged from totally oblivious npc's to fully paid up actors.

"Everyone must check in"
1659696378594876.jpg

Amazing that you can end up in court for pointing out all this obvious visual bullshit but here we are.

And he still won't name the jew?
Admittedly I don't watch him much but when I see him ranting about "chinese communists" it seems he's naming them but only for those in on the jq.
 
Last edited:

CMcGillicutty

Well-known member
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖 💻
Zero sympathy for Alex Jones. You're not actually allowed to profit off of defamation, as CNN and WaPo found out when they defamed Nick Sandmann.

I agree with this guy:

View attachment 112511
Yeah but the court never proved defamation here as @JR_Rustler_III noted. They gave them a default judgment because the court said Alex and his lawyers refused to participate in the discovery phase of the pretrial.

And then yeah, sorry, when you take up Onigger's offer to come to the white house and start shilling gun bans in front of a chorus or international media correspondents, you're no longer a private citizen.


I know the fat man can be pretty unlikable to a lot of people, but he would have never focused on those parents if they hadn't gotten involved with democrat gun grabbers. And criticizing the motives of people showing up to the WH and begging us to gut the second amendment should be protected by the first amendment, no matter how baseless that criticism might be. These jewish Sandy hoax parents had no expectation of privacy. As JRR also said, case law says that public figures -- while they can still sue for defamation -- have to prove actual malice, where private citizens only have to prove negligence.


I've been following the Jones SH saga since it happened almost 10 years ago. I watched all the offending footage. I don't think there's proof Alex acted with malice -- intent to defame even though he knew it was defamation --; the judge basically said that the lack of internal communications from infowars disclosed during the discovery phase was proof enough, which is totally unconstitutional and jewish. At most, assuming SH was even real, you could argue Jones acted with negligence -- promoting misinfo that he sincerely believed was true without doing his due diligence --. But he'd be protected from that because they're public figures.

Also, pivoting back to Anglin said, in what way did Alex cost these people 4 million in tangible damages? Where are the receipts proving that these people lost work and had to pay out of pocket for mental trauma caused by the fat man?

Also, I know this is a LARP, but I'm just going to go ahead and say that the parents shouldn't be eligible to sue in American courts because they are jews, and jews should have their citizenship pulled and be eliminated from the general population. Even if this was good case law, I'd still support changing it to prevent them and every other jew from winning any lawsuit against real Americans.

I'm by no means a Jones superfan, he has his sins to atone for, as do we all, but yeah.
 

avatarless

KookWaffen
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓
Escaped True Master
I watched the full two and a half hour "we need to talk about Sandy Hook" documentary yesterday. This is the first and only exposure to any information I've had about this event, which is obviously not what it is presented as.
Several things stood out for me such as the police car video not tallying with documented police versions of the event timelines.
The chopper footage of the firehouse with the people going in the front and then coming out the back, the guy in yellow whose random movements were so obviously absurd that he had to be reprimanded by another simulation participator.
Then there is Gene (((((((((Rosen))))))))) (who others have correctly compared with the lunatic brother of the alleged Las Vegas shooter) who appears as the jewey wierdo supposedly the hero savior of random children that magically appeared outside his house at a time when he is shown ambling about outside the firehouse in the chopper footage.

This whole event is obviously a carefully choreographed psy-op that had many moving parts and many participants whose knowledge of that days events ranged from totally oblivious npc's to fully paid up actors.

"Everyone must check in"
View attachment 112530

Amazing that you can end up in court for pointing out all this obvious visual bullshit but here we are.


Admittedly I don't watch him much but when I see him ranting about "chinese communists" it seems he's naming them but only for those in on the jq.
@CharlesWorthing posted this yesterday. See number 5. I love a good Fema Capstone kook story as much as the next guy, but the debunk was very well done.
Idk, show me the dead bodies and I may believe somebody died.
 

TheDude

Kebob removalist
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓
“There is going to be a large set of plaintiffs dividing up the corpse of Infowars"-Sandy Hoax lawyer
I wonder if this greazy nigger with Jew traits white skinned lawyer sleeps with one eye open? Or does he even really sleep? Does he just do meth and stay up all the time or take downers to pass out? I'd sure have trouble sleeping if I was as greazy and slimy as him. But then I'm not a White jewnigger lawyer and I have a soul. Does he ever worry about ending up one day as ingredients in bags of dog food on a grocery shelf? Meh, maybe he is just so brown and squishy inside he doesn't worry about anything. Just a shit filled skin suit. Whew! That's a douchebag, I tell you what.
 

anti-barabas-ite

Work stuff through in your brain...UNVAXXED
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖 💻🥩🥃
Escaped True Master
Destructive Ceremonious Master
What storyline is Jones right about that they need to crush him ?

The sandy hoax is misdirection.

Is it the "elites eating babies" thing?
 

sandhedspile

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
SH was a “community event” and fundraiser. Jewish church was in the lead. SH was a decrepit run down moldy school. SH got over 200 million, es “parent” got reimbursed

Obama was at Stanford last week giving a speech urging disinformation be censored for our democracy.
 

Byeongshin

🎑 비셔스 리타드 🎴
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
But the problem is, what Alex Jones did didn't meet the legal standard for slander or libel. That's because from Day One the Sandy Hoax parents made themselves into public figures by their extensive and voluntary cooperation with the media, and as a result have profited considerably from Sandy Hoax over the last decade. By the time Alex Jones put them under a microscope, they had been public figures for years, which under US law essentially immunized Jones. There's a reason why the judge in this trial took the legally-unprecedented step of slapping a default judgment on him, because there's simply no case to be made against him, so she was forced to take extraordinary and outrageous measures. Nick Sandman, on the other hand, never made himself into a public figure--instead, the media imposed that upon him, for the explicit purpose of defaming him. If Kyle Rittenhouse hadn't fallen into the grip of his current handler (an ex-Navy SEAL and obvious FBI/CIA/ADL asset) and gotten some actual good legal advice, he would have avoided exploiting the media for personal benefit, so as to not jeopardize his future ability to sue for defamation. But, that's a different story.

You can criticize Alex Jones for a lot of things, not the least of which is turning himself into a circus act, but he's been proven right enough times that whatever misinformation he's put out there is outweighed by the good work he's done. I suppose you could make an argument that Alex Jones is a CIA "limited hangout" disinformation psyop, or he's part of a giant kayfabe of some sort, but the longer this goes on, the more unlikely that seems.
Not that it would make much of a difference anyway, but all ~40 of the parents are public figures? I doubt that Alex Jones would have even made this argument. I don't know the name of a single one of them. Alex Jones, on the other hand, has a massive audience including a bunch of schizos who harassed these parents. Being upset about that makes the parents evil? Seeing how some of them have nothing left to lose, Alex is lucky nobody murdered him. He knew exactly what he was doing.

Conspiratards can spew this garbage because nothing is at stake. If their lives depended on being right about this, they'd abandon the "crisis actors" and all the other bullshit immediately. It is, as a certain writer said in 2013, just a way to feel superior to the "sheeple." And you know why I personally have so much contempt for it.

Yeah but the court never proved defamation here as @JR_Rustler_III noted. They gave them a default judgment because the court said Alex and his lawyers refused to participate in the discovery phase of the pretrial.

And then yeah, sorry, when you take up Onigger's offer to come to the white house and start shilling gun bans in front of a chorus or international media correspondents, you're no longer a private citizen.


I know the fat man can be pretty unlikable to a lot of people, but he would have never focused on those parents if they hadn't gotten involved with democrat gun grabbers. And criticizing the motives of people showing up to the WH and begging us to gut the second amendment should be protected by the first amendment, no matter how baseless that criticism might be. These jewish Sandy hoax parents had no expectation of privacy. As JRR also said, case law says that public figures -- while they can still sue for defamation -- have to prove actual malice, where private citizens only have to prove negligence.


I've been following the Jones SH saga since it happened almost 10 years ago. I watched all the offending footage. I don't think there's proof Alex acted with malice -- intent to defame even though he knew it was defamation --; the judge basically said that the lack of internal communications from infowars disclosed during the discovery phase was proof enough, which is totally unconstitutional and jewish. At most, assuming SH was even real, you could argue Jones acted with negligence -- promoting misinfo that he sincerely believed was true without doing his due diligence --. But he'd be protected from that because they're public figures.

Also, pivoting back to Anglin said, in what way did Alex cost these people 4 million in tangible damages? Where are the receipts proving that these people lost work and had to pay out of pocket for mental trauma caused by the fat man?

Also, I know this is a LARP, but I'm just going to go ahead and say that the parents shouldn't be eligible to sue in American courts because they are jews, and jews should have their citizenship pulled and be eliminated from the general population. Even if this was good case law, I'd still support changing it to prevent them and every other jew from winning any lawsuit against real Americans.

I'm by no means a Jones superfan, he has his sins to atone for, as do we all, but yeah.
Okay, so he didn't comply with discovery and it was a default judgment. Default judgments exist, like it or not. The outcome would have been the same either way. Unless he, you know, produced evidence that they were crisis actors. LOL

I think it's unfortunate that some of the parents were talked into appearing with gun-grabbers (when something utterly horrible and senseless happens to you, you look for someone or something to blame), but even attending the White House a single time doesn't make someone a public figure and I don't think Alex Jones' lawyer would have advised him to make the argument that they were.

In what way did CNN or WaPo cost Kyle Sandmann millions (which they settled for - it would have been worse for them if it had gone to court) in tangible damages? In both cases, someone bigger defamed someone much smaller, which is a big no-no. Damages being way higher than the actual receipts is nothing new or unique.

I hope Alex Jones being ruined can serve as a valuable lesson about right-wingers marrying themselves to stupid bullshit. At some point you gotta wonder why we always lose, right?
 

Cathy

Fiddle with it to realize
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻


Previously: #FreeAlexJones #SandyHoax #TheJuiceIsLoose #CrisisActors: AJ Only Ordered to Pay $4.2 Million

The Sandy Hoax people over at CNN and the New York Times are claiming that Alex Jones is going to have to pay $45.2 million in extra “punitive damages” to the Sandy Hoaxster crisis actors.

They are eventually admitting that these kinds of damages are illegal in Texas – but not until the 12th paragraph.

New York Times:



I think Alex isn’t as broke as he claims, but this is just retarded.



This was absolute bullshit. How did they lose money because Alex called them out?

Did they lose acting gigs, because people would have noticed that they were fake shooting parents?



Did you see this bitch on stand?




The only way someone would claim that is not “acting” is if they were afraid of getting sued by Jews. It is simply not believable that this woman is really tore up about her dead son. She is reading a scripted statement, without any emotion.



Yeah, see – it’s about alleged dead kids and their grieving parents. Oh no, actually it’s about “misinformation,” which wasn’t even a thing in 2012 when Alex said this stuff.



This has already been challenged repeatedly. Everyone was saying when the $4 million ruling came through that Alex’s really challenge was the punitive damages, but I looked this up. You can’t charge someone more than $750,000 in punitive damages. If the jury wanted this in the tens or hundreds of millions, they would have to have done that in the initial compensatory damages.

Maybe they will overturn these Texas protections – who knows. That’s possible.

The slime bag attorney – who himself appears to be an actor – is saying that the various groups of actors will be “dividing up the corpse” of Infowars.




Eventually, Alex Jones will be destroyed one way or the other.

He still has non-Texas trials where judgements are going to be issued.

This is just total evil, what they are doing to Alex, saying openly “well, we can’t refute what you’re saying, so we’re just going to totally destroy your life.” People need to understand: that is how these people think, those are the rules we are all operating under in this stupid, fake, hoax country we live in.



Continue reading...
Did Alex meet the parents and have them place a hand on the Bible and have them swear their child died at Sandy Hoax?

Did Alex visit the marked graves of each "dead child"?

Cuz this is what I would do if I were him.
 

CMcGillicutty

Well-known member
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖 💻
Okay, so he didn't comply with discovery and it was a default judgment. Default judgments exist, like it or not. The outcome would have been the same either way. Unless he, you know, produced evidence that they were crisis actors. LOL
The argument isn't that default judgments shouldn't exist. The argument is the court did not prove Jones acted with malice to defame the parents.

Another LARP here but if somebody refuses to participate in discovery, they should be held in contempt of court until it gets sorted out. I don't think holding them automatically liable for 60 gorillian dollars is the proper way to handle that.


I think it's unfortunate that some of the parents were talked into appearing with gun-grabbers (when something utterly horrible and senseless happens to you, you look for someone or something to blame), but even attending the White House a single time doesn't make someone a public figure and I don't think Alex Jones' lawyer would have advised him to make the argument that they were.
Yeah but it was a lot more than just one photo op at the WH. It was testifying in congress, giving interviews to the disgusting jew astroturfed moms demand action and everytown organizations, interviews with international media, websites and blogs and social media accounts they started with the explicit intention of milking their alleged tragedy to advance the attenuation and eventually abolition of the second amendment, public speaking tours, book deals, documentaries.

And it was the most vocal jewish ones who of course spearheaded all of this. It was a fat greasy, curly haired kike named Leonard Pozner who was the first parent to sue. And yes he was out there doing all the things I enumerated.


And not only did he get involved with all that stuff in regards to gun control, now he's out there doing all the same public stunts demanding big tech cracks down on "hate speech and fake news."

I guess to clarify, I should note the way I talk about the SH parents is 95% based on that jew. You said you didn't know any of their names, so yeah. Not a big fan of the Sandy Hoax parents. I'm apagnostic about it honestly; apathetic and agnostic about it. Maybe it happened, maybe it didn't. I don’t care either way, life goes on. Years have gone by without me even thinking about it. But say what you will about Alex, and you can say quite a lot, he'll never be as big of a piece of shit as Lenny Pozner.


In what way did CNN or WaPo cost Kyle Sandmann millions (which they settled for - it would have been worse for them if it had gone to court) in tangible damages? In both cases, someone bigger defamed someone much smaller, which is a big no-no. Damages being way higher than the actual receipts is nothing new or unique.
Sandmann had a good case for lost future earnings given he was a minor and a private citizen; but I'm sure you know as well as I the real reason they paid those settlements was to mitigate the punitive damages which would have been far costlier. And again, unlike Pozner who started all the lawfare against Jones, he was just some random kid the judenpress crucified because it was a slow news day and they hate White Christian people. Pozner and co. embraced and entertained this DNC-Bloomberg-media circus for years. Per Cornell law:

"A public figure, according to Gertz v. Robert Welch, is an individual who has assumed roles of especial prominence in the affairs of a society or thrust themselves into the forefront of particular public controversies to influence the resolution of the issues involved."

Seems to me like Pozner and indeed the majority of the families who appeared at the WH to whine about the GOP not gutting the bill of rights would fit that definition. Maybe if they were just a silent cousin who stood in the background of a photo op with onigger you could argue this guy was still a private citizen, but Pozner I remember being very vocal.

Unlike Sandmann who hadn't even graduated highschool, Pozner and the rest of these parents were all middle aged and working, or taking hot beef injections from a man who worked while sipping wine with the gals and minding the children in the case of the Sandy Hook moms. I don't believe they could show evidence of one single employer turning denying them work because of what Alex Jones and his fans said about them. I don't believe a lot of White, Christian male (i.e. credible) psychologists would testify in all honesty that what Jones said caused them long lasting psychological damage, and even if then, where are the receipts for the treatment? I don't believe they were left to foot hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical bills for counseling over what Jones said.
 

FvckingJoggerboos

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
Escaped True Master
The usual faggots around me are so excited about this. These are the same losers that love Ukraine, love trannies, love the vaxx and hate the orange man. I would love to tell them if they just listened to Alex Jones they wouldn't have taken the deadly shots that are slowly killing them.
 
Top