Mary Phagan's great grand niece doesnt want Leo Frank exonerated

Angryguy

Same angryguy new look
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻

Jews have chutzpah. They want the black guy blamed without evidence. Their proof Leo Frank was innocent. The towns people took the word of a dirty nigger over a jew, therefore they must have harbored a secret kind of racism called anti semitism.

"MY NAME is Mary Phagan-Kean and I am the great-niece and namesake of “Little Mary Phagan,” the thirteen-year-old girl who was raped and murdered by Leo Max Frank, the president of Atlanta’s B’nai B’rith Lodge No. 144, on April 26, 1913.
Leo Frank was the manager of the National Pencil Company — a sweatshop factory where over a hundred children labored, and where the Sam Nunn federal building stands today. Little Mary Phagan was 12 years old when she started working there in 1912, and Frank admitted he was the last person to see Mary alive.

In fact, the evidence of his guilt was overwhelming and on August 25, 1913, after a month-long trial in the Fulton County Superior Court, Leo Frank was found guilty by a jury of his peers, and on the next day, he was sentenced to hang for the murder of Mary Phagan.

What followed was an unprecedented effort by Leo Frank and his legal team and supporters to pin this horrific crime on everyone but himself. It is an effort that continues to this very day. The Leo Frank case is no “cold case.” It is obvious to anyone who objectively considers the case evidence that Leo Frank was rightly convicted for this heinous crime.

Today, his supporters have targeted a black man named James Conley who worked as a janitor at the factory. Evidence shows that after Frank beat and strangled Mary he was unable to move the body. He called on Conley and ordered him to help him conceal the crime and swore him to secrecy. After initially concealing Frank’s crime Conley ultimately revealed to authorities the true events of that day. The detail he gave was so shocking and so convincing that he became the state’s star witness against Leo Frank. Frank and his legal team’s response was to accuse Conley of the murder, and that has been their story for a century.

But Mary’s killer was not James Conley, and the state of Georgia proved beyond any reasonable doubt that Leo Frank alone murdered Little Mary Phagan.

The Phagan family has no objection to anyone expressing their opinions about the Leo Frank case, but we do insist that organizations and personal campaigns not distort the truth and facts to use this case for their own political purposes. For over 100 years, each passing decade brought with it dubious revelations of “new historical evidence” falsely claiming to exonerate Leo Frank. The Phagan family has stated since 1982 that if there were clear-cut evidence to clear Leo Frank of this heinous crime, we would be the first to ask for an exoneration. However, such historical evidence has never come to light. Rather, there are considerable data, extensive documentation, revealing archival material, and legal, court, and government records that only support and even strengthen the guilty verdict.

Phagan Family’s Statement on the Latest Attempt to Exonerate Leo Frank

It was reported in the Atlanta Journal and Constitution that on April 26, 2019 [ironically 106 years to the day after Mary Phagan’s murder] that the Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard [defeated by Fani Willis on November 6, 2020] had established a “Conviction Integrity Unit” that he said would review the Leo Frank conviction of 1913. Those named as participants in this move were the following:

Former Governor Roy BarnesRabbi Steven LebowAttorney Dale SchwartzMelissa D. Redmon, director of the University of Georgia Law SchoolFormer Supreme Court Justice Leah Ward SearsFormer Court Chief Justice Norman FletcherFormer Cobb County Superior Court Chief Judge J. Stephen SchusterAssistant District Attorney Van Pearlberg

The Family of Mary Phagan believes that these individuals have colluded since August of 2018 to find a way to vacate the murder conviction. ADL attorney Dale Schwartz was quoted thus: “we’re still trying to get a new trial that would, in effect, exonerate him.” [In 1914, several attempts were made to “exonerate” Leo Frank using “new evidence” that included witness affidavits later found to have been forged or obtained by bribery and other illegal means. See the Atlanta Constitution of May 5, 1914, p. 1.]

Clearly, the new agency was a blatantly political scheme that had nothing to do with justice. It was set up, it appears, at the behest of the above-mentioned Frank advocates for one purpose only — to help Leo Frank escape culpability for his crime. According to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution (May 7, 2019), Fulton County D.A. Paul Howard stated, “The Frank Case helped inspire the creation of the new unit” and that former Gov. Roy Barnes “will serve as a consultant.” Barnes admitted that he “had lobbied the district attorney [Howard] to re-examine Frank’s case

Let us be clear what that means. Those statements alone convince us that the Conviction Integrity Unit has already determined the outcome of the Leo Frank case. According to the article, “Barnes said he is convinced that this will happen. ‘There is no doubt in my mind, and we’ll [Who is “we?” — Ed.] prove it at the appropriate time, that Frank was not guilty.’”

For years Roy Barnes has been promoting a fraudulent narrative about the Frank case, and in particular that the 1913 trial was illegitimate because it was “mob-dominated.” He said that “there were just mobs of people. And as the jury would go [to] the courthouse every day, the mob would scream, “Hang the Jew or we’ll hang you!”[1]

This charge is a blatant lie that has been disproven by the scholars of the case. It was made up long after the trial by an overzealous writer trying to make a name for himself. Only Barnes continues to repeat it.[2] For this and many other reasons Governor Roy Barnes is simply unfit to participate in any serious inquiry into the Leo Frank case.

Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard (with former Governor Roy Barnes) announces “Conviction Integrity Unit” to re-open Leo Frank case. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, May 7, 2019. Once again, most advocates and so-called experts who determine Leo Frank is not guilty have relied on blatantly false information and politically biased propaganda. Frank’s conviction was upheld by thirteen separate courts and judges in his thirteen appeals from Fulton County to the United States Supreme Court. Every court affirmed the trial was fair and the jury was not “mob terrorized.”

What’s more, driven by the need to exonerate a Jewish leader, they intend to convict an innocent African American man, James Conley — Frank’s employee that he ordered to help move the body. They ignore the 20 young girls and women who testified under oath that Frank sexually harassed them at the factory. Frank’s attorneys refused to cross-examine ANY of them, and later admitted that they were all telling the truth.[3]

Nonetheless, Frank’s advocates spread fabrications, propagandize falsehoods, distort the facts and change headlines of original newspapers to promote the hoax of not guilty. The real miscarriage of justice is that in this time of the #MeToo movement, they seek to override a duly convicted child rapist and murderer’s conviction.

The Evidence Points to Leo Frank’s Guilt

Most people are not aware that there was blood and hair evidence at the murder scene, that Frank changed his alibi several times and lied to police, and that he sexually harassed his young girl employees. Most people are unaware that Leo Frank hired private detectives who planted evidence and bribed and intimidated witnesses to change their testimony. They even hatched a plot to murder the African American James Conley who became a key witness against Leo Frank.[4]

Most people are not aware that the two detective firms Leo Frank hired; the Pinkertons’ National Detective Agency and the Burns Detective Agency concluded Leo Frank was guilty of the murder!

At his own trial Leo Frank refused to be sworn on the Bible and be cross-examined. A lot has been covered up about the case, including Leo Frank playing the race card to play to the white jurors’ prejudices about black men.

In 1915 and under intense political pressure Gov. John M. Slaton commuted Frank’s death sentence to life imprisonment. But even as he signed that commutation order he also wrote that the U.S. Supreme Court “found in the trial no error in law” and had “correctly in my judgment [found] that there was sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict.”

The fact is that Leo M. Frank was found guilty under Georgia law with facts and evidence, not with political bullying. The good people of Georgia can make up their own minds about Leo Frank’s innocence or guilt by delving into the historical records themselves. Having researched the Leo Frank/Mary Phagan murder case, including spending thousands of hours examining court records, newspaper reports, and private and public archives, I ask you to please consider the following facts:
On Saturday April 26, 1913, Leo Frank used the opportunity of a deserted factory and his power as the company boss to lure Little Mary Phagan to a back area of the factory and attempt to rape her. Mary resisted and, and in the struggle Frank struck her and knocked her unconscious, and then strangled her to death. He left a trail of clues leading to himself, so within a few days of the murder he was arrested.

Evidence showed that the murder was sexually motivated, and many of Leo Frank’s own female employees testified to Leo Frank’s history of sexual harassment. They testified that he “got too familiar,” “put his hands on” them, tried to corner them, and proposed sexual acts to them for money.

These teenagers bravely took the witness stand and spoke of Leo Frank’s lewd behavior. Sixteen-year-old Nellie Wood told the court how Frank had pushed himself against her and touched her breast. Fourteen-year-old Nellie Pettis—a witness for the defense—recounted how Leo Frank had propositioned her for sex. Twenty girls in all gave similar testimony about Frank’s improprieties. Several male employees described how they had witnessed Leo Frank “rub up against” young female workers “a little too much.” The testimony was so explicit that the judge had to clear the courtroom of women.
The defense attorneys did not even attempt to cross-examine any of the girls who testified at trial about Leo Frank’s lewd behavior. Instead, Leo Frank’s lawyers argued that his improper behavior was not wrong—that it was a sign of more liberal times! One even said in his closing argument, “Deliver me from one of these prudish fellows that never looks at a girl and never puts his hands on her…”

In the South the LOVE of Jews reigned supreme — not anti-Semitism!

Most people are unaware that the prosecutor Hugh Dorsey first brought his case against Leo Frank before a 23-member grand jury that included five prominent members of the Jewish community (including at least two from Frank’s own synagogue), and all the grand jurors signed the bill of indictment against Leo Frank.

The trial judge, Leonard Roan, was once a law partner of one of Frank’s defense attorneys, Luther Rosser and, according to a confidential ADL memo: “In general, the rulings of the trial Judge had been favorable to the defense.” Leo Frank’s defense attorney even declared after the trial: “[W]e do not make the least criticism of Judge Roan, who presided [over the trial]. Judge Roan is one of the best men in Georgia and is an able and conscientious judge.”

The false claims of anti-Semitism before, during, and after the trial of Leo Frank are simply unfounded and untrue. The detailed daily accounts by the three Atlanta newspapers — the Constitution, the Georgian, and the Journal, each of which had Jewish editors — reflected no anti-Jewish bias at all. Leo Frank’s religion is only alluded to when it is reported that he is the president of ‘B’nai B’rith, and he is written of with the utmost respect for his prominence in the community. In fact, a University of Georgia study showed that the reportage by Atlanta’s three dailies was openly pro-Leo Frank and exhibited a pronounced pro-Frank bias.

Author Steve Oney, listed by the Anti-Defamation League as an expert on the Leo Frank case, reported: “To the extent that there was bias in the coverage, it was mostly in Frank’s favor…” He goes on to state that Atlanta’s newspapers, “evincing the prejudices of the time, ridiculed the state’s star witness—a black factory janitor named Jim Conley…”

It has been claimed that “anti-Semitism” and the “hatred of Jews” motivated Leo Frank’s conviction and lynching. And yet, incredibly, there was no anti-Semitism expressed by police, detectives, prosecutors, jurors, judge, or reporters! There was no “prejudicial trial” or “mob rule” or anti-Jewish bigotry of any kind.

Mr. Oney refutes the claim that there were anti-Semitic mobs shouting “Hang the Jew!” He told the Jewish Journal:

t didn’t happen. It was something that someone wrote a couple [of] years after the crime, and then it got stuck into subsequent recountings of the story….Jews were accepted in the city, and the record does not substantiate subsequent reports that the crowd outside the courtroom shouted at the jurors: ‘Hang the Jew or we’ll hang you.’” Though there is no record of “anti-Semitism” on the part of the crowd, the courtroom audience, the press, or the prosecutors, that doesn’t mean it was non-existent. As the evidence of his guilt became overwhelming, Leo Frank and his lawyers tried desperately to insert “anti-Semitism” into the trial as a diversionary tactic. They actually staged a courtroom confrontation with a prosecution witness over his alleged previous “anti-Semitic” statements. This officially brought “anti-Semitism” into the trial for the first time. Turns out that witness was working for the Leo Frank defense and was planted to promote their “anti-Semitism” agenda. It was yet another trick by the Leo Frank defense to undermine the court proceeding and to neutralize the evidence of his guilt.

The ADL has been promoting a lie for over a century!

“HANG THE JEW, HANG THE JEW” is what the Anti-Defamation League says was chanted during the month-long trial, but its own expert Steve Oney says it NEVER OCCURRED!

According to Steve Oney, at the time of Mary Phagan’s murder, “Atlanta was a philo-Semitic city. Its assimilated, German-Jewish elite were part of the financial and legal power structure…” Gov. John Slaton in his commutation order also addressed the false claim of an “anti-Semitic mob” surrounding the courtroom pressing to lynch Leo Frank: “No such attack was made and…none was contemplated.” Gov. John Slaton countered the false claim of an “anti-Semitic” atmosphere by reminding Leo Frank supporters that Jews were highly respected and appreciated in Georgia because they had been “conspicuous” contributors to the history and development of the state
By the time of his lynching in 1915 many people — including his Jewish supporters — not only were repelled by Leo Frank’s abrasive personality but also believed he was in fact the murderer of Mary Phagan. Chicago icon Albert Lasker, a Jewish philanthropist and the “father of modern advertising,” paid millions (in today’s money) for Leo Frank’s defense, but he privately admitted that he was not even convinced that Leo Frank was innocent.

Lasker financed all of Frank’s post-conviction appeals and orchestrated his international public-relations campaign that involved media outlets across the nation, including the New York Times. Albert Lasker recalled the meeting in Frank’s jail cell:

“It was very hard for us to be fair to him, he impressed us as a sexual pervert. Now, he may not have been—or rather a homosexual or something like that…”

According to Lasker’s biographer, the men with him during that encounter took “a violent dislike to him.” Lasker “hated him,” and said, “I hope he [Leo Frank] gets out…and when he gets out I hope he slips on a banana peel and breaks his neck.”

Leo Frank’s Trial Defense was one of the most RACIST in American History

Though “anti-Semitism” was not a factor in his trial, Leo Frank’s racism certainly was: Frank’s defense attorneys used the word “nigger” and other racist slurs dozens of times in court. His main attorney told the jury: “If you put a nigger in a hopper, he’ll drip lies.”
Leo Frank argued in court that the many black witnesses that testified against him should not be believed — simply because they were black — and that “negro testimony” — as they referred to it — was by definition inferior and unreliable. At trial Leo Frank’s attorney castigated the white jurors for even considering the testimony of the black witnesses:

“They would rather believe the negro’s word….Oh, how times have changed. I hope to God I die before they change any worse than this…”

Frank’s lawyers argued to the jury of twelve white men that murder, rape, and robbery were “negro crimes” and thus Leo Frank, “a white man,” could not have committed the murder of Mary Phagan. One defense attorney said that “the murder was the unreasoning crime of a negro,” that “It isn’t a white man’s crime.”

Leo Frank’s own racist thinking is reflected in an Atlanta Constitution front-page headline on May 31, 1913: “Mary Phagan’s Murder Was Work of a Negro Declares Leo M. Frank.” The newspaper quoted Leo Frank:

Here is a negro [James Conley], not alone with the shiftless and lying habits of an element of his race, that is common to the South….No white man killed Mary Phagan. It’s a negro’s crime, through and through. No man with common sense would even suspect I did it.”

Leo Frank’s supporters then and now have played the race card and falsely represent an African-American man as the “real killer.” For over 100 years James “Jim” Conley has been scapegoated in nearly all the literature on the case. He was a sweeper in the factory on the day of the murder who was ordered by his boss Leo Frank to help move the dead body of Mary Phagan. When James Conley confessed to his accessory-after-the-fact role, Frank and his supporters tried to pin his crime on Conley. Leo Frank’s supporters continue to this day to smear James Conley as a devious criminal who got away with murder, but Conley’s very detailed statement—corroborated by the physical evidence at the crime scene — was so convincing that it became central to the prosecution’s case. (At trial, Leo Frank refused to be cross-examined by prosecutors, but James Conley withstood 16 hours of cross-examination—under oath.)
In 1914, Leo Frank supporters tried to hire a black woman named Annie Maude Carter to slip James Conley some poison while he was in jail waiting to testify at Frank’s hearing for a new trial. She identified the would-be assassins in open court as prominent members of the Jewish community. The plot was exposed in the May 6, 1914 edition of the New York Times.

Before he accused James Conley of the crime, Leo Frank worked overtime to pin the murder on another factory employee — the African-American night watchman who found Mary Phagan’s body, Newt Lee.Leo Frank hired private detectives who planted a blood-soaked shirt in the innocent black man’s home, and then Leo Frank’s attorney hinted to the police where they might find that damning “evidence.” When the newspapers reported that a bloody shirt was found at Newt Lee’s home, it almost caused an innocent man to be lynched. Luckily for Newt Lee, Leo Frank’s private detectives did such a sloppy job at planting the shirt that the police were not fooled at all, and it only increased their suspicion of Leo Frank. That is the point when the people of Atlanta came to believe—and rightly so—that Leo Frank was the murderer of Little Mary Phagan.
I, Mary Phagan-Kean, examined in detail the dubious claims of Alonzo Mann, who came forward in 1982 — after 69 years of silence — to say he saw Conley with the body of Mary Phagan. It turns out that his new statements hurt Leo Frank far more than they help him.

• Alonzo Mann (who died in 1985) was Frank’s “office boy” in 1913 and from the very start he gave many conflicting stories that are irreconcilable with the known facts: In May 1913 as a young teenager, Alonzo Mann told detectives 3 different stories in 3 separate interviews and gave yet another story in his sworn testimony at trial in August. In those interviews and in his trial testimony Alonzo Mann never mentioned seeing James Conley at all on the day of the murder. At age 83, in his 1982 videotaped session before the State Board of Pardons and Paroles, he gave still more conflicting versions that contradict the testimony of Leo Frank himself!

What motivated Alonzo Mann to break his 69-year silence on the Leo Frank case by pinning the crime on James Conley? The answer was disclosed at the videotaped private hearing in 1982: behind Alonzo Mann’s obviously scripted, wavering “testimony” was a book and movie deal executed by the Tennessean newspaper—the same Tennessean that abandoned the truth and the facts of the case and any trace of journalistic ethics just to exonerate Leo Frank. So Alonzo Mann was induced to come forward for fame and fortune.

Alonzo Mann in 1913: Tells 4 different versions, and 2 more in 1982. The Phagan family was consulted by the Board in the run-up to the 1983 pardon decision, since the surviving members of the family had a great deal of personal knowledge of and documentation about the case and would be directly and profoundly affected by any decision. It was our Little Mary who had been strangled and very likely raped, after all. And the Board denied that pardon application.

The Jewish organizations tried again in 1986, but this time the Phagan family was not consulted. They were told about the upcoming pardon decision after the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (ADL) and its well-heeled allies: Atlanta Jewish Federation and American Jewish Committee had been meeting with and lobbying the Board for six months or more. Why the secrecy? Obviously, the Jewish groups — led by Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith board member and attorney Dale Schwartz — didn’t want the victim’s family to have any say on the matter or any time to alert the public as to what was afoot.

Thus, in 1986 the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles issued a posthumous “pardon” to Leo Frank on the basis of the state’s failure to protect him while in custody, but it did not absolve him of the crime of murdering Mary Phagan and Frank’s conviction remained intact.

Believe it or not, there are still documents from the Leo Frank case that are being hidden from the public because they have been classified as “GEORGIA STATE SECRETS”! Our repeated attempts to obtain them from the Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles were denied again in December 2020. What could they be hiding? What could be so secret about a case that is 106 years old!? And why aren’t the media pursuing this extraordinary government action?

Sources Banned and Censored

On the 100th Anniversary (April 26, 2013) of Mary Phagan’s rape and murder, the trial Brief of Evidence and appeals records of the Leo Frank case were digitized as well as the voluminous Atlanta newspaper reports about the crime.

These sources — and many, many more like them — use to be available on the internet until very recently. Indeed, the books, videos, articles, and court documents that provide a balanced view of the case have been systematically removed from the internet SINCE THE Fulton County CONVICTION INTEGRITY UNIT WAS ANNOUNCED!

No Longer Available

Original articles from the three major dailies covering the day-by-day progress of the case (removed from archive.org)Videos from YouTube that challenge the false idea that Leo Frank was “wrongly convicted.Official case documents like the Brief of Evidence, the appeals filings, and the published trial records have been scrubbed from the internet.Books that prove Leo Frank’s guilt and provide a serious case analysis have been banned and censored. My 1987 book titled The Murder of Little Mary Phagan has been removed from some websites where it was previously available for years. The Nation of Islam’s recent book Leo Frank: The Lynching of a Guilty Man has been mysteriously banned from sale on Amazon.com.Google searches EXCLUDE articles and documents that show evidence of Frank’s guilt.When we made an Open Records Request to the University of Georgia, they first said 70 records match the request. When we paid to have them mailed to us, all of a sudden, all 70 records vanished with no explanation!

Fortunately for the Fulton County Conviction Integrity Unit, the public and the media will still be able to access those critical official documents that the Leo Frank crusaders are trying to hide. We have made them available at LittleMaryPhagan.com where we believe they will be safe from the Leo Frank censors and their internet cleansing campaign.

Fulton County District Attorney, Paul Howard was defeated in the last election but the Conviction Integrity Unit he set up is still operating under the new District Attorney Fani Willis. Ms. Fani Willis might do well to ask why the original documents in the case all of a sudden have been removed from the internet, and who had the power to remove them and why. How can the case be carefully reviewed without them? Indeed, the books, videos, articles, and court documents that provide a full and balanced view of the case have been systematically removed SINCE THE CONVICTION INTEGRITY UNIT WAS ANNOUNCED!!! Obviously, Truth has become offensive or objectionable and has been deemed “hate speech” in order to impose censorship. But FACTS ARE NOT HATEFUL!

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis inherited this corrupt process, but will she bow to the same pressure that was put on her former boss to exonerate a man who raped and murdered our family member?

As of today, no word from Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis on whether her office will finally give long overdue justice to the victim, Mary Phagan. Can we expect that she will stand by her own words?: “Cases won’t be for sale under my administration. Not for an endorsement, not for money, not for anything.” “You have my word, during my tenure as district attorney in Fulton County, we will become a beacon for justice and ethics in Georgia and across the nation.” “[D.A.] Willis vowed to bring ‘transparency and accountability’ to the DA’s office,” reported the Atlanta Journal and Constitution.

She would be the first to do so. We’ll

"
 

Jjames

Unreconstructed
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
No matter what they do or say it won't unhang that murderous pervert. The good men of Georgia carried out the legal sentence of hanging despite all the Jew money and influence from around the world that tried to set Leo Frank free. There was a time in Georgia once when poor white girls were deemed worthy of protection and their abusers could expect punishment.
 

Angryguy

Same angryguy new look
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻
I always tell people the ADL was formed to defend a guy who tried blaming a black man for a murder he committed. It is a good way to splash cold water in the face of normies who have had the narrative "blacks always scapegoated" not only is it easy to get them to believe this. It also is another example of jews projecting onto others what they actually do.
 

Coltraine

America First
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
Jews have chutzpah.
The Evidence Points to Leo Frank’s Guilt
Believe it or not, there are still documents from the Leo Frank case that are being hidden from the public because they have been classified as “GEORGIA STATE SECRETS”! Our repeated attempts to obtain them from the Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles were denied again in December 2020. What could they be hiding? What could be so secret about a case that is 106 years old!? And why aren’t the media pursuing this extraordinary government action?
It's important to note too that this isn't just the specific technique that Jews and philo-Semites use when merely talking about or debating who was actually guilty in the context of the Leo Frank case alone. Nope. This is how the Jews frame the debate whenever it comes to absolutely anything criminal, conspiratorial, and/or immoral that any Jew(s) have ever been accused of whatsoever in the entire history of the Jewish race. They start from the premise that no Jew anywhere at any time ever has ever done anything illegal, immoral, etc, and then they pivot off of that premise to accusing you and everybody else of being some kind of "secret Nazi anti-Semite Inquisitor" for daring to even suggest momentarily that Jews do otherwise!

That's an important distinction- I think. Because once you've seen the template used like above in the Leo Frank case for how the Jews are rhetorically and superficially able to absolve themselves of any guilt legal or moral or otherwise, then you can slowly see that same template followed in practically every single other case throughout Jewish history where Jewry was then accused of wrongdoing. Jews even have a special name for when they get caught doing these things. They refer to them historically as "affairs". So there's always some new "affair" either here or there. Because it's not actually Jewish Ritual Murder there, simple goy, it's merely just the Velisch Affair or the Lodz Affair or the Syracuse Affair or the Budapest Affair. Because they happened everywhere for one, and for two these ritual murders by Jews just have to be downplayed as much as possible when speaking in front of the goyim. So Jews have to give them innocuous-sounding euphemisms- of course!

It's the same way the Jews treat the Damascus Affair of 1840 for instance, where there is a heck-ton of evidence to the contrary of what every Jew in the book attempts to propose to your goyisch face. It's the same way with all the different Ritual Murders of the Medieval and more recent past (there were several just in the last century by the way, and even one in America). It's the same moral and legal Talmudry the Jews use to confuse you on almost everything else too- from the La Guardia Ritual Murder in Spain in 1491 to the Passion of William of Norwich in 1144 to the Velisch Affair in Russia in 1823 all the way down to the Clayton, Pennsylvania Incident in the US in 1913 (yes the Frank case wasn't the only Jewish "Affair" of 1913 either!).

A lot of these instances are documented in my list below which combines these legitimate Ritual Murder events with all of the local expulsions that I have found throughout Jewish history. Most of these cases, by the way, are documented straight from Jewish primary sources too, which I of course cite in the document accordingly:


Now this is not to say that Jews are always guilty throughout the long history of these various charges against them either. That is a strawman that the Jews also like to frequently toss about to people like myself who make it my business to know the fine details of most of these accusations against them throughout time. But it's just to say that in the majority of them we can still find plenty of evidence pointing to varying degrees of Jewish Guilt one way or the other. And in nearly all of them we can still find plenty of evidence long after the fact of other Jews years later still attempting to cover-up their crimes whether through modern-day digital censorship or just through the classic, widely used method of threats and intimidation to publishers and researchers by these Organized Crime mafias like the ADL and the JDL are famous for historically.

Just in the case of Leo Frank alone we see that Organized Jewry just in the past few years has successfully censored the Nation of Islam's book about the history of Leo Frank's murder/rape of Mary Phagan off of the pages of Amazon:

1627532300986.png

Which brings up a good point: why is it that the Nation of Islam is the only entity or individual capable of even writing a complete history today of this case? The answer is clearly because everybody else is too afraid of running afoul of Jewish Power!

But that is the single best full-length book available on the subject in existence today in my opinion. You can still find it elsewhere online however- just not from Amazon.

Jews just never stop.

And of course there's always new crimes, new rapes, and new ritual murders to cover-up too!

You can also still find quite a lot about this case from the biography of the Jew Albert Lasker spoken about in the article above called The Man Who Sold America:

1627532894837.png


Just that one Jew's biography alone is more than enough to make your blood boil after reading some of the classic subversions he was able to pull off throughout the course of his decades-long career in the early advertising industry. Lasker due to his advertising genius was somehow able to mass-hypnotize many millions of normal Americans during the first half of the last century into this more reliable, morally flexible, and materialist collective of uber-consumers with his Jew-sophistry and magic. Well, he also tried to use that same magic on the nation in defense of Leo Frank too, but it didn't really work like he and other elite Jews planned.

Lastly, E. Michael Jones has an entire chapter dedicated to the Frank case in his beautiful new series of books The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History.

1627535037803.png


@Panzerhund New books recommended here for you if you're interested, bro.
 
Last edited:

Angryguy

Same angryguy new look
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻
It's important to note too that this isn't just the specific technique that Jews and philo-Semites use when merely talking about or debating who was actually guilty in the context of the Leo Frank case. Nope. This is how the Jews frame the debate whenever it comes to absolutely anything criminal, conspiratorial, and/or immoral that any Jew(s) have ever been accused of whatsoever in the entire history of the Jewish race. They start from the premise that no Jew anywhere at any time ever has ever done anything illegal, immoral, etc, and then they pivot off of that premise to accusing you and everybody else of being some kind of "secret Nazi anti-Semite Inquisitor" for daring to even suggest momentarily that Jews do otherwise!

That's an important distinction- I think. Because once you've seen the template used like above in the Leo Frank case for how the Jews are rhetorically and superficially able to absolve themselves of any guilt legal or moral or otherwise, then you can slowly see that same template followed in practically every single other case throughout Jewish history where Jewry was then accused of wrongdoing. Jews even have a special name for when they get caught doing these things. They refer to them historically as "affairs". So there's always some new "affair" either here or there. Because it's not actually Jewish Ritual Murder there, simple goy, it's merely just the Velisch Affair or the Lodz Affair or the Syracuse Affair or the Budapest Affair. Because they happened everywhere for one, and for two these ritual murders by Jews just have to be downplayed as much as possible when in speaking in front of the goyim. So Jews have to give them innocuous-sounding euphemisms- of course!

It's the same way the Jews treat the Damascus Affair of 1840 for instance, where there is a heck-ton of evidence to the contrary of what every Jew in the book attempts to propose to your goyisch face. It's the same way with all the different Ritual Murders of the Medieval and more recent past (there were several just in the last century by the way, and even one in America). It's the same moral and legal Talmudry the Jews use to confuse you on almost everything else too- from the La Guardia Ritual Murder in Spain in 1491 to the Passion of William of Norwich in 1144 to the Velisch Affair in Russia in 1823 to the Beiliss Affair in Russia in 1911 all the way down to the Clayton, Pennsylvania Incident in the US in 1913 (yes the Frank case wasn't the only Jewish "Affair" of 1913 either!).

A lot of these instances are documented in my list below which combines these legitimate Ritual Murder events with all of the local expulsions that I have found throughout Jewish history. Most of these cases, by the way, are documented straight from Jewish primary sources too, which I of course cite in the document accordingly:


Now this is not to say that Jews are always guilty throughout the long history of these various charges against them either. That is a strawman that the Jews also like to frequently toss about to people like myself who make it my business to know the fine details of most of these accusations against them throughout time. But it's just to say that in the majority of them we can find plenty of evidence the points to Jewish Guilt one way or the other, and in all of them we can still find plenty of evidence long after the fact of other Jews years later still attempting to cover-up their crimes from the past whether through modern-day digital censorship or just through the classic, widely used method of threats and intimidation whether to publishers or researchers themselves like the ADL and the JDL are famous for historically.

Just in the case of Leo Frank alone we see that Organized Jewry just in the past few years has successfully censored the Nation of Islam's book about the history of Leo Frank's murder/rape of Mary Phagan off of the pages of Amazon:

View attachment 60690

That is the single best full-length book available on the subject in existence today in my opinion. You can still find it elsewhere online however- just not from Amazon.

Jews just never stop.

And of course there's always new crimes, new rapes, and new ritual murders to cover-up too!

You can also still find on Amazon a lot about this case from the biography of the Jew Albert Lasker spoken about in the article above called The Man Who Sold America:

View attachment 60691


Just that one Jew's biography alone is more than enough to make your blood boil after reading some of classic subversions he was able to pull off throughout the course of his decades-long run in the early advertising industry transforming normal Americans during the first half of the last century into reliable, gullible goyim, uber-consumers and believers in more Jew-sophistry.

Lastly, E. Michael Jones has an entire chapter dedicated to the Frank case in his beautiful new serious of books The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History.

View attachment 60694


@Panzerhund New books recommended here for you if you're interested, bro.
I wish your post was the thread. Another excellent post. Never knew about the Damascus affair. What vile scum jews are.
 

Coltraine

America First
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
the Damascus affair
Sir Richard Burton's book The Jew, The Gypsy, and El Islam is one of the single best sources on the Damascus Affair (1840).

There's a thread already started here on this forum in regard to the book, and the Ritual Murder of the Catholic Priest is talked about in that thread at some length if I remember correctly. This was another well-documented case much like the Frank Affair where there was no doubt whatsoever in the minds of the Moslems- both the Sultan and his higher-up government officials as well as the little people Moslems too- as to the Jewish community's guilt in murdering the Priest and his companion. And then the Jews bribed the Sultan successfully as well as the Vizier of Egypt too in order to let the Jews off the hook eventually. And this pissed off quite a lot of people at the time- both Catholics abroad as well as Moslems.

This caused a big sensation and scandal at the time all throughout Europe too- especially in the higher political and diplomatic circles where Jews were of course already powerful then but they were embarrassed at the same time because of what their Jewish ethnics had been caught doing in Syria. And so the Elite Jews attempted to cover the whole thing up with bribes and threats of war basically. And Big Jews like Moses Montefiore, Baron de Hirsch, and the Rothschilds of England and others personally all got involved in the diplomatic and military activity at the time in order to threaten the Ottomans into basically acquiescing to the Jews' version of events which obviously pronounced the Jews in Damascus totally innocent of any wrongdoing whatsoever (even though everybody in Damascus knew differently- of course!).

The Rothschilds through their French agents in government like Adolphe Cremieux even threatened war against the Ottomans if they refused to drop the ritual murder accusation and investigation and then do exactly as the Big Jews in England and France wanted. It was a crazy international scene, and as I'm sure you're aware this was all going on in the aftermath of all the revolutionary activity in Greece which had then been fighting against the Ottomans for over a decade prior for independence. And that again was used as a military chess-piece basically from the Rothschilds in order to successfully threaten the Ottomans into doing what the Jews desired in regard to the embarrassing situation in Syria. You gotta remember that this was at the peak of Rothschild power in Europe just a few decades after that family made all its money in Napoleon's defeat at Waterloo. And so the Rothschilds were basically the financiers of all European states, princes, kings, and wars at this time through their monopoly in the banking industry. They had immense power in the Islamic world too. So the Jews through Rothschild and company absolutely knew how to successfully leverage their international power during the Damascus Affair to hush up the entire scandal and put the Ottomans (and Catholics too) back in their place.

And it was one of the first real historical instances where not merely national but international pressure was brought to bare upon a single political entity (the Ottomans, and to a lesser extent the Vatican too) in order to force them to do what the powerful Jews in Europe desired whether they wanted to themselves or not. The Damascus Affair of 1840 wouldn't be the last time that the Jews succeeded using this international strategy either. We see the same strategy being used many times now throughout our own era (against Saddam Hussein in Iraq and Gaddafi in Libya for examples).

Anyway, here's the thread I am talking about:


It's a good historical thread where lots of relevant stuff pertaining to mid-19th Century world politics is discussed- particularly in light of Sir Richard Burton's famous book which told the truth about the Jews and the Damascus Affair, and then the Jews started threatening to silence and even kill Burton himself because he had written this book, LoL. I am not making this up either, LoL. A lot of this is talked about in that link directly above. Enjoy!
 
Last edited:

Louis_McFadden

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
Escaped True Master
Lots of great info on the stinking, filthy, rotten, lying, Christ-murdering jews in this thread.

The way they whipped up a mob to put Jesus Christ on a cross after he was tried in a bullshit trial and still found faultless is their most outrageous piece of handiwork, and they still try to pawn that one off on the guy who found no fault in him and washed his hands of it. They even have the preachers buying into this bullshit and teaching that Pontius Pilate and the Romans are the ones who murdered Christ. And guess what? If you really follow Christ then they want to do the same thing to you. That's why Christ himself told you that if you want to follow him to pick up your cross, because he knew these rotten piece of shit jews would want to crucify you just as they did him. They accuse us of hate. I said it in another thread, and I'll say it here: I'm not motivated by hate. I'm motivated to try to find the truth. The truth is hate to jews, because their very existence is based on lies. If people figure this out then the jews lose their control over whoever has figured it out, now that person is dangerous, a hate monger, conspiracy theorist, a trope and canard peddler, dealing in baseless claims.

Some of you have probably already listened to this back when it was first posted on the NYT website. For those who haven't, if you want to hear a sniveling whining yammering little yid kvetch, listen to Jonathan Weissman explain anti-Semitism in America. He talks about the Leo Frank case, and in his mind it's all settled; Leo was innocent and the people who hung his ass were evil. They always make themselves out to be holier than thou, and everything they say is 100% unadulterated bullshit. The only thing anything needs to be true is for a jew to say it, if a jew says it, it's true so far as they're concerned. Only problem is, they never tell the truth and they hate the truth. That's why we get lied into wars, it's why we lose wars, it's why the US military is a laughing stock now, it's why America has been turned into a modern day Sodom and Gomorrah, it's why they are unpersoning the very founders of the republic -- removing statues and pushing diversity, it's why a dollar saved is a penny earned -- because the only thing it takes to turn that dollar into a penny is the time it takes for them to destroy it with their printing press BRRRRRR'ing. Everything -- and I mean EVERYTHING -- wrong in America, can be laid at the feet of the disgusting parasite jews. They own it. They did it. They're still doing it.

Look, this is really really simple: The JQ has got to be dealt with. That's it. That's all she wrote.
Until such time as the JQ is dealt with, we'll just keep on losing and being destroyed from within'. God is not going to bless us when we're allowing Satan's kids to rule over us. You are not to allow strangers to rule over you. You have strangers ruling over you right now.
People better get their shit together on this, because time is not on your side. It sure as hell isn't on my side, and I'd like to participate on the day of reckoning -- if it be God's will! I pray that it is.
 

rouse

the 10th dentist
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻
It's important to note too that this isn't just the specific technique that Jews and philo-Semites use when merely talking about or debating who was actually guilty in the context of the Leo Frank case alone. Nope. This is how the Jews frame the debate whenever it comes to absolutely anything criminal, conspiratorial, and/or immoral that any Jew(s) have ever been accused of whatsoever in the entire history of the Jewish race. They start from the premise that no Jew anywhere at any time ever has ever done anything illegal, immoral, etc, and then they pivot off of that premise to accusing you and everybody else of being some kind of "secret Nazi anti-Semite Inquisitor" for daring to even suggest momentarily that Jews do otherwise!

That's an important distinction- I think. Because once you've seen the template used like above in the Leo Frank case for how the Jews are rhetorically and superficially able to absolve themselves of any guilt legal or moral or otherwise, then you can slowly see that same template followed in practically every single other case throughout Jewish history where Jewry was then accused of wrongdoing. Jews even have a special name for when they get caught doing these things. They refer to them historically as "affairs". So there's always some new "affair" either here or there. Because it's not actually Jewish Ritual Murder there, simple goy, it's merely just the Velisch Affair or the Lodz Affair or the Syracuse Affair or the Budapest Affair. Because they happened everywhere for one, and for two these ritual murders by Jews just have to be downplayed as much as possible when speaking in front of the goyim. So Jews have to give them innocuous-sounding euphemisms- of course!

It's the same way the Jews treat the Damascus Affair of 1840 for instance, where there is a heck-ton of evidence to the contrary of what every Jew in the book attempts to propose to your goyisch face. It's the same way with all the different Ritual Murders of the Medieval and more recent past (there were several just in the last century by the way, and even one in America). It's the same moral and legal Talmudry the Jews use to confuse you on almost everything else too- from the La Guardia Ritual Murder in Spain in 1491 to the Passion of William of Norwich in 1144 to the Velisch Affair in Russia in 1823 all the way down to the Clayton, Pennsylvania Incident in the US in 1913 (yes the Frank case wasn't the only Jewish "Affair" of 1913 either!).

A lot of these instances are documented in my list below which combines these legitimate Ritual Murder events with all of the local expulsions that I have found throughout Jewish history. Most of these cases, by the way, are documented straight from Jewish primary sources too, which I of course cite in the document accordingly:


Now this is not to say that Jews are always guilty throughout the long history of these various charges against them either. That is a strawman that the Jews also like to frequently toss about to people like myself who make it my business to know the fine details of most of these accusations against them throughout time. But it's just to say that in the majority of them we can still find plenty of evidence pointing to varying degrees of Jewish Guilt one way or the other. And in nearly all of them we can still find plenty of evidence long after the fact of other Jews years later still attempting to cover-up their crimes whether through modern-day digital censorship or just through the classic, widely used method of threats and intimidation to publishers and researchers by these Organized Crime mafias like the ADL and the JDL are famous for historically.

Just in the case of Leo Frank alone we see that Organized Jewry just in the past few years has successfully censored the Nation of Islam's book about the history of Leo Frank's murder/rape of Mary Phagan off of the pages of Amazon:

View attachment 60690

Which brings up a good point: why is it that the Nation of Islam is the only entity or individual capable of even writing a complete history today of this case? The answer is clearly because everybody else is too afraid of running afoul of Jewish Power!

But that is the single best full-length book available on the subject in existence today in my opinion. You can still find it elsewhere online however- just not from Amazon.

Jews just never stop.

And of course there's always new crimes, new rapes, and new ritual murders to cover-up too!

You can also still find on Amazon a lot about this case from the biography of the Jew Albert Lasker spoken about in the article above called The Man Who Sold America:

View attachment 60691


Just that one Jew's biography alone is more than enough to make your blood boil after reading some of the classic subversions he was able to pull off throughout the course of his decades-long career in the early advertising industry. Lasker due to his advertising genius was somehow able to mass-hypnotize many millions of normal Americans during the first half of the last century into this more reliable, morally flexible, and materialist collective of uber-consumers with his Jew-sophistry and magic. Well, he also tried to use that same magic on the nation in defense of Leo Frank too, but it didn't really work like he and other elite Jews planned.

Lastly, E. Michael Jones has an entire chapter dedicated to the Frank case in his beautiful new series of books The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History.

View attachment 60694


@Panzerhund New books recommended here for you if you're interested, bro.
Dude, you're like the Richard Dolan of Jew-ology. Impressive!
 

TheAvenger

Love Your Fate :"Amor Fati"
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
Jewish guilt is the glue that binds them all and when the jew ethos and true nature is revealed through any of their minor or major "crimes against humanity" they instantly react, like a pack of killer bees where some type of collective tribal magic force compels them to protect the jewish race or in short Evil protecting Evil. Using money, influence, intimidation, threats, specious legal arguments, media influence. Even if their efforts occasionally fail they will have cast enough doubt and false info that can be used to assuage any argument, so the truth is always tainted.

There is no way to win a dialectic argument with a Jew, ever.. There is no way to negotiate with a jew, it's impossible, there's no way to reason with a jew, there's no other way to deal with them beyond .... the final solution.
 

Coltraine

America First
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
the Richard Dolan of Jew-ology
Initially, I had to look that name up. But then I realized that I did know who he was all along, LoL.
 

rouse

the 10th dentist
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻
Initially, I had to look that name up. But then I realized that I did know who he was all along, LoL.
Yeah, that was kind of an obscure compliment, lol.
 

Postuma

I like white.
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
Somewhere (here?) I heard that yesterday was the anniversary of the glorious lynching of that scumbag. So I ended up reading about the case on Unz Review,
Nice summary, reiterates and re-inforces some of the point in OP. I missed this thread when it was first made.

God Bless the good citizens of Atlanta. The Jews are still butthurt over justice being served.
 

Coltraine

America First
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
I was recently browsing Amazon the other day and I came across an old Jew-authored book about the Leo Frank Affair. It's a totally apologetic work of Talmudic art (and fiction) actually, so it's not really even worth my time here to bother going into who exactly this Jew-author even was let alone the subject matter of the book in question, but up until very recently this text was pretty much the only one in existence in the mainstream, and it is still the main one that most researchers of this subject start with in the beginning in order to gauge the historiography itself and how the Frank case has been so heavily manipulated over the decades essentially.

But what impressed me most was that this book was published over a half-century ago in time, and yet as I started reading the real book reviews for the book in question on Amazon's site, I came across at least 2 reviews (out of maybe 5 in total) which really dissected not only the book in question but the entire Frank case in total from the perspective of just simple objective truth without the misguided assumption that Jews can just NEVER do anything criminal, conspiratorial, or otherwise immoral either in history or now currently. And so this one review was just so good and on-point that I decided to copy it myself for later use, and so I pasted into one of my Notepad files here on my flashdrive just in case I ever get into an argument in the future where I need to have quick and easy reference to many of the most specific details about the Frank case and its general aftermath.

1629357611620.png

So I'm just going to also copy the book review here as well, because although it's long if you can actually bare through to the end you will see that it's quite an excellent review and summation of the case at hand:

Retired Arizona Professor Emeritus of Judaic Studies, Leonard Dinnerstein, joins the eternal pantheon of notable authors discovered falsifying American legal history in discourse about the early 20th century Mary Phagan murder investigation and ensuing Leo Frank trial.

This 1991 edition of Dinnerstein's revisionist monograph on the Leo Frank Case is another shameless embarrassment to American academic standards of scholarly research, because Leonard Dinnerstein verifiably omitted 99% of the 1,800 page official Leo M. Frank Georgia Legal Records, that encompasses the 1913 summer trial & State Supreme Court Appeals from 1913 through 1914. These legal records fortunately survived in their entirety into the 21st century and provide a digest of the trial transcript and exhibits.

If anyone wants another example showing the educational system of America has reached its nadir & is infested with pathologically treacherous activist academics with racist agendas to perpetuate Jewish-Gentile culture wars, then students of law and history should study the primary sources of the Leo Frank Case and then cross reference them with every edition (1968 to 2008) of Leonard Dinnerstein's, 'The Leo Frank Case', it indisputably reveals he spent more than 40 years of his life making an absolute abject mockery of Southern legal history and jurisprudence.

In sum total the whole premise of Leonard Dinnerstein's book, 'The Leo Frank Case', is to smear the people of the South with a plethora of anti-Jewish canards; defame as an unscrupulous political climber, Hugh Dorsey, a man generally regarded as one of the greatest statesmen of the Southern progressive era; perpetuate racist conspiracies against African-Americans; and shamelessly rehabilitate the image of Atlanta's B'nai B'rith President, Leo M. Frank, the serial rapist-pedophile (see: GA Supreme Court Records, 1913, 1914), strangler and convicted child killer who was lynched on August 17, 1915, for bludgeoning, raping, garroting and ordering the necro-mutilation of 13-year old Mary Anne Phagan during the noon hour of Confederate Memorial Day, Saturday, April 26, 1913.

Instead of presenting all of the facts, testimony and evidence of the case in a fair, neutral, balanced and cogent manner, thus providing the readers with accurate information contextualized, so they might decide for themselves whether or not Leo Frank was innocent or guilty, instead, Leonard Dinnerstein perpetuates viciously racist blood libel accusation against European-American Gentiles, an example of one that is perhaps the most grotesque imaginable:

Concerning Jewish-Gentile relations, the general conclusion of Dinnerstein's lifetime thesis about that Leo Frank Case, is that in the context of a White racial segregationist & separatist Atlanta of 1913, White Southern Gentiles were so filled with anti-Jewish animus, that they knowingly and willingly set free a guilty African-American man who pounded his fists into the face of a little 13-year old White girl, just before raping, strangling and mutilating her. Moreover in this same vein, the reason why White Southern Gentiles knowingly let the guilty Black rapist and strangler go free, was so they could instead indiscriminately, but intentionally frame an innocent White man for the crime, primarily because he happened to be Jewish. And wait, there's more, this out of touch, nutty and lunatic conspiracy gets some icing on the cake too, topping it off, the unscrupulous Solicitor General Hugh Manson Dorsey, Atlanta Police and Detectives, all worked together coaching James "Jim" Conley until perfected as a trained parrot to trick the trial jury and unjustly convict Leo Frank.

Dinnerstein's 200+ page sleazy diatribe reveals his repulsive and psychopathic obsession with anti-Jewish intrigues and plots in the Old South and page after page he renders wrongful indictments against the good people of Georgia, the South and every Southerner, even though the consensus amongst Southern historians and scholars of all ethnic backgrounds is that Antisemitism was virtually non-existent in the Antebellum South and especially so during the progressive era when Jews prospered. In reality, the traditional culture of Southern hospitality & spirit of libertarian-capitalism, especially in Atlanta Georgia, enabled most Jewish families to thrive.

There is certainly plenty of racism, bigotry, prejudice and injustice to be found in our multicultural world, but there is really nothing more spineless and cowardly than to fabricate evidence of it and then falsely accuse someone of it without real evidence. Especially in a case where someone was convicted and sentenced to death by the overwhelming preponderance of the forensic evidence and trial testimony, sustained by every level of the United States of America's legal system from 1913 to 1986.

Continuing over a number of decades, the organized Jewish community regularly gave kudos and accolades to Dinnerstein for his numerous editions of his racist anti-Gentile propaganda books. Many once described Dinnerstein as the definitive author on the Leo Frank epic saga, that is until Journalist-Author Steve Oney came along, usurping that title as of 2003, when he published his long-winded and sloppily researched revisionist diatribe, 'And the Dead Shall Rise'. I strongly encourage people to purchase a copy of each book and then compare them both with the official Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence (1913) and period Atlanta newspaper (Constitution, Journal and Georgian) accounts from April 26 through August, 1913, to learn why the definitive 21st century account of this case has yet to be produced as of 2012 by either of these men.

What Leonard Dinnerstein doesn't tell the reader about the Frank-Phagan Case is an astonishing admission that was made by Leo Max Frank on August 18, 1913, at 2:46 p.m., while he was delivering his three and a half hour unsworn trial statement to the judge and jury. The specific revelation Leo Frank made was so incriminating that it amounted to the equivalent of a murder trial confession, and yet every revisionist Leo Frank partisan author conveniently leaves this stupefying incident out of their discourse.

Many 20th and 21st century Leo Frank activists have accused the populist publisher, Tom Watson, of causing Leo M. Frank to be convicted in 1913, but Watson did not publish anything about the case until the following year, well after the trial ended! Rather ironically, Tom Watson had been asked to represent Leo Frank for a sum of $5,000. In October, 1915, Watson published a scathing piece in his magazine about the national cause celebre created by a number of prominent Jewish leaders in their respective fields and well connected media moguls beginning in 1913, that oddly enough still continues today.

Another Spoiler Alert: The Leo Frank witness stand incriminating statements, made to the jury and judge on Monday, August 18, 1913, during the afternoon courtroom session, exactly three weeks into his month long trial.

Just minutes past noon on Confederate Memorial Day, Saturday, April 26, 1913, Mary Phagan entered the National Pencil Company to collect her pay envelope of $1.20. She normally earned $4.05 a week, but for only clocking 16 hours, her pay was significantly reduced. She had been temporarily laid off on Monday, April 21, 1913, because of a shortage of brass sheet metal used to make tubular eraser holders attached at the end of pencils. Phagan worked at the rear of the 2nd floor in the metalroom. Phagan's work station was next to the bathroom entryway. Phagan was a "tipper", inserting rubber erasers into the brass tubes of pencils for 7 and 4/11 cents an hour during a typical 55 hour, 6-day workweek, since the Spring of 1912.

Only moments after using the racially segregated "Negro Toilet", Newton "Newt" Lee discovered the dead body of Mary Anne Phagan in the basement of the National Pencil Company (NPCo) at about 3:15 a.m., on Sunday, April 27, 1913. Lee shoe shuffled to the cellar ladder and shimmied up the rungs to the first floor lobby, and then hustled up the stairs from the first floor lobby to Leo Frank's second floor office, where the only working phone in the building was located. Seizing it's mouth piece, dialing and asking the operator to connect him with the police, it was then that Lee reported the incident to Sergeant W. F. Anderson, night shift call officer for the Atlanta Police Station, who took the call at 3:24 a.m. Lee also made an attempt for 8 minutes to contact Leo Frank by phone, but no one answered at the Selig residence. The police arrived at the NPCo factory 15 minutes later in a Ford model-T.

The police later remarked about remembering looking through the glass and seeing Lee coming down the staircase with his smoky lantern bobbing as he descended. Moments later the police entered the factory lobby, they climbed through the narrow scuttle, descending 14 feet down a pitched wooden ladder to the cellar. With Newt leading the way, together they walked more than 100 feet to the rear of the stygian basement. When they came upon Mary Phagan in a filthy state, laying on her side, face encrusted with dirt, it gave the appearance she had been dragged. Seeing Phagan's reverently crossed arms was a site they would never forget for the rest of their lives.

Looking closer at the grizzly scene they noticed a long 1/8th inch cord made into a makeshift noose, taut around her neck, sunk flesh deep. Phagan's dress appeared ripped midsagitally from hem to crotch, and bloodied underwear were still attached to her body, torn open across the crotch up to the right seam, nearby two peculiar hand written notes were discovered scattered on the floor with a contrived message.

The notes later dubbed, "death notes or murder notes" described the Negro killer as the tall, dark & slim nightwitch, exactly describing the demographic information of Newton "newt" Lee, who was the tall, slim, and dark complected, nightwatchman for National Pencil Company only three weeks. The "death notes" essentially accused Newton Lee (colloquially called the Nightwatch) of raping Mary Phagan.

Lee was an old, bald & married African-American security guard with years of graveyard shift experience and no criminal record to boot, but if the incriminating notes stood up to a Grand and Petite Jury, Newt Lee would hang by the neck until dead as prescribed by law.

What made the notes so unusual is how they were written in a contrived manner, as if they were created by little Mary Phagan and addressed to her mother Francis, while Mary was in the midst of being sexually molested by Newt Lee. In the Old South of White racist ethnic solidarity, where the "purity and honor of White Southern Womanhood" was considered the most precious and sacred thing on Earth, if a Negro even whistled or "wild talked" at - or jostled a White woman, there was a dangerous risk of lynching. Out of nearly 3,500 lynchings in American history, the majority of victims were Negroes. It was Hugh Dorsey, who used his political influence & clout to openly advocated against lynching, even when it was politically unpopular to do so. Dorsey's effort helped to put this practice in morbid decline.

In 1913, Leo Frank was no ambitious upstart, he was an established and prominent leader of Atlanta's Jewish community, President of the local Bnai Brith (1912 to 1914), and nearly 5-year veteran factory superintendent of the well known National Pencil Company (NPCo).

After trying all night long, the police finally got Leo Frank on the phone at dawn and informed him briefly they needed to speak with him face to face.

On Sunday morning, April 27, 1913, Leo Frank was escorted by police to P.J. Bloomfield's mortuary to identify the victim. Leo Frank claimed he wasn't sure, that he would have to check his accounting & payroll ledgers to verify. The Atlanta Police drove Leo Frank to the NPCo and together they all went up to his second floor window front office, and reviewed his accounting books. The police specifically wanted Leo Frank to examine his payroll book, to try and pinpoint at what specific time Mary Phagan appeared in his office to collect her pay. After eyeballing his payroll logbook, Leo Frank told the police Mary Phagan had arrived in his office on Saturday, April 26, 1913, at sometime around 12:03pm.

Leo Frank then took out Newt Lee's time card from the clock and eyeballed it, telling the police it was punched perfectly every half hour between 6:00pm on April 26, 1913, to 3:00 am on April 27, 1913. The information given to the police gave the indication that Newt Lee had generally performed in accordance with what was expected of his duties during his security shift. Leo Frank was not under suspicion at the time and was allowed to go home.

The next day Leo Frank was called down to the station house early Monday morning, where he made a deposition to the police at 8:30 a.m., April 28, 1913. In an interrogation room at the Atlanta police station, Leo Frank had two of Georgia's most powerful lawyers representing him, Herbert Haas and Luther Z. Rosser.

Leo Frank specifically said Mary Phagan came into his second floor office on April 26, 1913, between "12:05 pm and 12:10 pm, maybe 12:07 pm". The significance of the Phagan arrival time would be revealed at the trial, because Leo Frank precisely nailed the time Mary Phagan was in his possession at 12:07 pm (Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence, State's Exhibit B, April 28, 1913), but the day before he said 12:03 pm. Leo Frank would change the Phagan arrival time at least three separate times.

On Monday morning, April 28, 1913, Leo Frank also told the police that he made a mistake concerning Newt Lee's timecard that became Defendant's Exhibit A. In contradiction to his statement on Sunday, April 27, 1913, when he had reported in front of Police that Lee's timecard was punched perfectly every half hour, but after closer inspection, the nightwatchman had actually missed four half hour punches, leaving open four hours of unaccounted for time. This conflicting new information, added even greater suspicion upon Newt Lee, who was at the time already prime suspect. It was the coup de grace - the death blow - upon Newt Lee after Leo Frank made this revelation, but it turned out the next day to be an overzealous blunder that forever changed the tide against him.

While interrogated, Leo Frank had a flash of brilliance, he stood up and sophorifically disrobed for the police, they inspected his body and it was a genius segway to get them to visit his home for the purpose of inspecting his laundry. Leo Frank had adroitly plucked himself out of the spiders web, and got the spiders to take him home where they inspected his hamper. Ah, that most delicate feint and subtle engram of a hint, for the police to check the Negro's shack on 68 Henderson St. And on Tuesday morning, April 29, 1913, at 9:00 a.m. sharp, with a skeleton key they did.

On Monday morning, April 28, 1913, at 6:35 a.m., Robert Paul Barret found bloody hair tangled around the iron handle of his bench lathe (Coroner's Inquest, May, 1913), it was located against the south wall of the metalroom. Moments later, one of the child laborers, Magnolia Kennedy, discovered what looked like a 5" inch wide fan shaped blood spatter stain crowned with droplets on the floor near the bathroom's door and she immediately told Barret. Instead of cleaning up the bloodstain on the floor with soapy warm water and a brush, someone had smeared a white powder lubricant over it, known as haskolene.

The metal room forensic discoveries were critical, because it meant Mary Phagan might not have been initially killed in the basement where she was dumped, but in the metal room on the second floor. The police were able to come to this conclusion because the dragmarks on Phagan's face showed no sign of bleeding or healing under a magnifying glass, thus she had already been quite dead when she was dragged from the bottom of the elevator shaft in the cellar. The police measured 140 feet from the drag marks beginning at the basement's elevator shaft to the rear where she was found.

After Leo Frank was arrested on Tuesday, April 29, 1913, at 11:35 am, he swore to the Police for 3.5 months he never left his office on April 26, 1913, from high noon to 12:45 pm. During the Coroner's Inquest on May 5 & 8th 1913, Leo Frank swore under oath that he had never left his office during the noon hour on April 26, 1913, except to go upstairs at a quarter to 1:00 O'clock.

A breakthrough in the Mary Phagan murder mystery occurred on Saturday, May 3, 1913, as Atlanta police accidentally bumped into 14-year old Monteen Stover at the National Pencil Company factory. At that exact moment, Stover was a former employee of the NPCo and present with her step mother who was terrified and livid, because of some very interesting circumstances that occurred exactly one week earlier. Monteen Stover had failed to retrieve her pay envelope the week before on April 26, 1913. When the police asked Stover what time she arrived at the factory, she said she arrived in Leo Frank's office at 12:05pm and found Leo Frank's office empty, so she waited for five minutes and left at 12:10 pm, because she thought the factory was empty. When asked how she knew what time it was, Stover reminded the police about the wallclock in Leo Frank's office.

On Sunday, May 4, 1913, armed with new contradictory timeline information from Monteen Stover, Detective John Black and Pinkerton Detective Harry Scott approached Leo Frank in his jail cell to test his murder alibi and asked him if he had been in his office every minute from high noon to 12:45pm on April 26, 1913. Leo Frank responded affirmatively with the words "Yes". The question was restated - were you in your office every minute between twelve noon and 12:35pm on April 26, 1913? Leo Frank again responded again affirmatively with the words "Yes".

Detectives considered it a major breakthrough in the Mary Phagan murder investigation, because the contradiction resulting in Monteen Stover's factory arrival time, suggested that Leo Frank might have gone with Mary Phagan back to the metal room before 12:05 pm on April 26, 1913. The mystery was narrowing, but then Leo Frank widened it the next day by again changing the time of Mary Phagan's arrival for the third time.

On Monday, May 5, 1913, Leo Frank told the Coroner and his 6-man-jury, that Mary Phagan had come to his office between 12:10pm to 12:15pm on Saturday, April 26, 1913, contradicting his deposition to police on Monday, April 28, 1913, that Phagan came into his office between 12:05pm and 12:10pm, maybe 12:07pm, and even further contradicting his Sunday, April 27, 1913, statement that Mary Phagan entered his office at 12:03pm. The Coroner and his Jury, unanimously voted to bind Leo Frank over for murder to the Grand jury.

After a 2-week investigation into the Phagan murder, Leo Frank was unanimously indicted by 21 Grand Jurymen which included several Jewish members, on Saturday, May 24, 1913. Putting serious doubt into Dinnerstein's supposition that Leo Frank was indicted and convicted because of anti-Semitism. For insight into what was stated at the Leo Frank Grand Jury hearings, one can get a good idea by reading the Leo Frank Trial Transcript recorded in the three major competing Atlanta newspapers at the time.
Leo Frank's 29-day trial began on July 28, 1913 and ended on August 25, 1913, the testimony segment ended on August 21, 1913, when the closing arguments began.

The Solution to the Murder of Mary Phagan:

Leo Frank made his newfangled revelation at his trial on August 18, 1913 at 2:46pm, explaining why Monteen Stover had found his office empty on April 26, 1913, between 12:05 pm and 12:10 pm. Leo Frank told the Judge and Jury the reason why his office was empty, was because he might have "unconsciously" gone the bathroom in the metal room during this time.

Leo Frank's exact words on the witness stand at his trial:

Now, gentlemen, to the best of my recollection from the time the whistle blew for twelve o'clock until after a quarter to one when I went up stairs and spoke to Arthur White and Harry Denham, to the best of my recollection, I did not stir out of my office; but it is possible that in order to answer a call of nature or to urinate I may have gone to the toilet. Those are things that a man does unconsciously and can not tell how many times nor when he does it (Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence, 1913, p. 186).

This astonishing admission was most significant, NOT only because the only set of bathrooms that existed on the second floor were located in the metal room (Defendant's Exhibit 61, State's Exhibit A), but also, because the bathroom area in the metal room was the place Jim Conley testified finding Mary Phagan dead, after Leo Frank privately confessed to having committed the violent assault, because Phagan refused to have sex with him.

The "death notes" have Mary Phagan going to "make water" in the only place possible she could have gone to the bathroom, namely the metal room bathroom on the second floor. There was no bathroom accessible on the first floor when the Clarke Woodenware company departed on January 17, 1913. The large office space on the first floor had been locked since January and Mary Phagan would likely not have gone all the way down into the dark gloomy basement and walked all the way to the rear in the pitch black darkness for the purpose of using the racially segregated "Negro toilet".

Everything kept pointed to the the 2nd floor metal room, and Leo Frank would do more than just make his admission that his detractors believe amounted to a murder trial confession on August 18, 1913, Leo Frank would sustain this dumbfounding irony on March 9, 1914, in an authorized jailhouse interview published in the Atlanta Constitution.

Did Leo Frank confess the murder of Mary Phagan to his wife Lucille Selig as Alleged?

What Dinnerstein does not provide you with is the complete specifics of what the Selig cook Minola McKnight and her common law husband Albert revealed to the police on June 3, 1913, about the second murder confession of Leo Frank, one that occurred at the Selig residence on the evening of April 26, 1913. At 10:30 pm on Saturday, April 26, 1913, one drunk Leo Frank confessed to his wife Lucille S. Frank, what he had done at the factory that afternoon (see: Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence, State's Exhibit J, June 3, 1913). Leo Frank told his wife he didn't know why he would murder and asked for his pistol to shoot himself. Leo also made Lucille sleep on the floor. It likely explains why Lucille did not visit Leo Frank in jail for 2 weeks after his arrest on Tuesday, April 29, 1913. It also explains why the grave site #1 reserved for Lucille S. Frank (Official Real Estate Location ID: 1-E-41-1035-01), located to the immediate left of Leo Frank's grave at the Mount Carmel Cemetery, is still empty according to staff and their records at the front office there as of 2012.

When all was said and done, isn't it odd the wife of Leo Frank who stood by her husband during his capital murder trial and appeals is not buried next to him? Isn't it a trifle odd, that her cremated ashes were not dispersed near him at the Mount Carmel Cemetery in Queens, NYC?


State's Exhibit J, would be sustained by Lucille Selig Frank, when she requested cremation in her magistrate notarized 1954 last will and testament (available at the government probate office, 2012). According to Lucille Selig's grand nephew retired in St. Petersburg Florida, she requested to her family before passing away that the ashes be spread in an Atlanta park, but a local ordinance prevented it, so she was instead buried in an unmarked grave between the tombstones of her beloved parents in the Historic Oakland Cemetery in Atlanta (Oney, 2003, 2004).

Leonard Dinnerstein also perpetuates the Pierre van Paassen's (1964) bitemark hoax. Excerpt that discusses the Leo Frank Case and Van Paassen's discovery of photographic evidence in 1922, see pages 237 & 238:

The Jewish community of Atlanta at that time seemed to live under a cloud. Several years previously one of its members, Leo Frank, had been lynched as he was being transferred from the Fulton Tower Prison in Atlanta to Milledgeville for trial on a charge of having raped and murdered a little girl in his warehouse which stood right opposite the Constitution building. Many Jewish citizens who recalled the lynching were unanimous in assuring me that Frank was innocent of the crime.

I took to reading all the evidence pro and con in the record department at the courthouse. Before long I came upon an envelope containing a sheaf of papers and a number of X-ray photographs showing teeth indentures. The murdered girl had been bitten on the left shoulder and neck before being strangled. But the X-ray photos of the teeth marks on her body did not correspond with Leo Frank's set of teeth of which several photos were included. If those photos had been published at the time of the murder, as they should have been, the lynching would probably not have taken place.

Though, as I said, the man died several years before, it was not too late, I thought, to rehabilitate his memory and perhaps restore the good name of his family. I showed Clark Howell the evidence establishing Frank's innocence and asked permission to run a series of articles dealing with the case and especially with the evidence just uncovered. Mr. Howell immediately concurred, but the most prominent Jewish lawyer in the city, Mr. Harry Alexander, whom I consulted with a view to have him present the evidence to the grand jury, demurred. He said Frank had not even been tried. Hence no new trial could be requested. Moreover, the Jewish community in its entirety still felt nervous about the incident. If I wrote the articles old resentments might be stirred up and, who knows, some of the unknown lynchers might recognize themselves as participants in my description of the lynching. It was better, Mr. Alexander thought, to leave sleeping lions alone. Some local rabbis were drawn into the discussion and they actually pleaded with Clark Howell to stop me from reviving interest in the Frank case as this was bound to have evil repercussions on the Jewish community.

That someone had blabbed out of school became quite evident when I received a printed warning saying: "Lay off the Frank case if you want to keep healthy." The unsigned warning was reinforced one night or, rather, early one morning when I was driving home. A large automobile drove up alongside of me and forced me into the track of a fast-moving streetcar coming from the opposite direction. My car was demolished, but I escaped without a scratch (Pierre van Paassen, To Number Our Days, 1964, p. 237-8).

Basic Fact Checking:

In reality X-ray technology was in its infancy in 1913, it was not possible to x-ray bitemarks on skin in 1913, or today. Vehicles had virtually no safety features to speak of in 1922, so the chances of someone walking away "without a scratch" from a two car head on collision is an incredulous bald faced lie. Was Leo Frank's appeals attorney named "Harry Alexander" (false) or Henry Alexander (Correct)? Leo Frank was not lynched on his way to his murder trial in 1913, Leo Frank had his trial and he was sentenced to death by Judge Leonard Strickland Roan on August 26, 1913, he was hanged nearly two years later on August 17, 1915. Leo Frank went on trial in Atlanta, not 170 miles away in Milledgeville where the hoaxer suggests the trial was scheduled.

Leonard Dinnerstein's hatecrime hoax:

Dinnerstein also perpetuates a judicial hatecrime hoax, that mobs of angry people were screaming racist anti-Semitic death threats at the jury through the courtroom windows. See: Leo Frank and the American Jewish Community for the American Jewish Archive Journal 1968 volume 20 number 2. None of Leo Frank's voluminous appeals ever mention this incident, nor do any of the local Atlanta newspapers that had teams of reports inside the courtroom and outside the courtroom.

Leo Frank helped the police uncover Jim Conley wrote the murder notes?

Leonard Dinnerstein in the documentary, 'People v. Leo Frank' (2009), made another bald faced lie that Leo Frank helped the police uncover the fact Jim Conley could write concerning the "murder notes" found next to Mary Phagan. Read my Amazon-dot-com review of the documentary People v. Leo Frank (2009) concerning Dinnerstein's interview where he publicly falsifies the legal records of the case. The trial transcript reveals Leo Frank never helped the police uncover the fact Jim Conley could write and wrote the "murder notes" framing Newt Lee. See the Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence (1913) for the definitive proof.

This book does not stand up to even the most basic fact checking:

Despite the fact this book is filled from beginning to end with easily disproven falsehoods and obfuscations, I must admit the gold leaf sprayed on the page-edges is rather nice. I encourage everyone to buy a copy of this book and compare it with the official legal files, records and documents of the Leo Frank case in the Georgia Supreme Court Archives, to learn why this book is nothing more than an anti-Gentile racist morality tale sham that makes a baseless mockery of U.S. legal history.


... Let's be honest, Leo frank was found guilty by a jury of 21 men, which included at least 2 Jewish fellows, all unanimously found found Leo frank culpable of child rape and murder.

Yet, the special interests (Northern newspapers) pressured the Georgia governer with bribes and threats of withdrawing their monetary support. Thus sadly this pedophile was given a slap on the wrist with probation.


Many many, people were outraged and participated in extra judicial punishment.

(I don't want to directly link the Amazon link here on this site, but if you want to read this book review and the other negative review for the book in question, it is easy to find just by going on Amazon and typing in "Dinnerstein Leo Frank", and you will quickly find the original source for what I have copy/pasta'd above)

The book in question is one by Leonard Dinnerstein called simply The Leo Frank Case, and it was published originally back in the early 1960s just to give you a rough idea into the time-frame here when this sloppy apology for Jewish Criminality was originally authored. The Jews could be so sloppy and so bold back then, of course, because there was no internet yet, and there was really no real large groups of non-Jews even discussing Jewish Criminality and Conspiracy on a regular basis either at that time. Plus in the 1960s you have over four full decades having gone by where a lot of people who knew the truth had already died in the meantime while those people who were younger at the time had forgot a lot of the original details about the case. So Jews could just easily pay one of their own proto-Ben Shapiros to go out and write this blatantly System-approved martyrology, and then of course the New York Times would instantly without reading recommend it to all its millions of readers as a "Best Seller", and then the rest of course was history.

But as the above book review on Amazon demonstrates, readers are not buying this Talmudism forever without question. Both history bufffs like myself as well as legal minds of the current day are coming across this case as they do and they are acknowledging the truth of the matter in that this Jew Leo Frank was always guilty as charged! There never was any "mystery" like this kike Dinnerstein attempts to evoke above in his own text! And the only mystery whatsoever was why crooks at The ADL weren't prosecuted after the fact or even hanged just for subverting justice the way they did (and continue to) knowing full well themselves deep down that Frank was guilty!

By the way, I also found it interesting that in the book by Dinnerstein above, none other than the infamous legal-kike Alan Dershowitz is the author of the book's Preface and Forward to every edition of the book after the first edition. So that lets you know just how the premier kike legal minds even still of today are still standing behind Leo Frank and still pleading his total innocence in front of the gullible goyim- although it's mostly been in vain thus far along as the Organized Jews haven't yet been able to overturn Frank's original verdict and sentence. Key word there is "yet", as these Jews will obviously keep trying until they succeed as this original OP above makes quite clear that Jews are still pressuring the progeny of the Phagan family themselves even still today to relinquish their legal standing and precedent when it comes to the original outcome of the Leo Frank case.

@Postuma @rouse @Angryguy @Jjames @Panzerhund @TheAvenger
 
Last edited:

Tom Rogers

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
Q. Are we quite sure that Mary Phagan (I think her surname was Phagan-Keane, with or without the hyphen) was not Jewish herself?

I realise the name is Irish, but I've read Dickens (Fagin - Oliver Twist), so can't help associating the name with Jews, and I know that Jews have the name Faigen, which is German. It seems likely to me that some Jews in the South (Feigans and other Jews with similar surnames) may have Hibernised/Gaelicised their names so as to assimilate.
 

Tom Swift

Active member
Cave Beast
⏰☕
One defense attorney said that “the murder was the unreasoning crime of a negro,” that “It isn’t a white man’s crime.”
No lie detected there.

Many jews have been convicted for heinous crimes like Leo I'm sure and even a few may have been lynched. I wonder why this leo case is so important to them? What is it about Leo's jewish status that causes such jew mania?
 

DaRealFashGordon

Well-known member
Cave Beast
⏰☕🚬
No lie detected there.

Many jews have been convicted for heinous crimes like Leo I'm sure and even a few may have been lynched. I wonder why this leo case is so important to them? What is it about Leo's jewish status that causes such jew mania?
interesting I wonder what else was at play here . at this point they should just scrub the ADL site of Leo and move on . Someone else is going on here that all these jews are defending him this hard for this long .... I bet there was some kind of ritual murder going on
 

DaRealFashGordon

Well-known member
Cave Beast
⏰☕🚬
How many Mary Phlagans where there in Occupide Russia and eastern Europe

how many Mary Phlagans are there in Palestine ?

how many where there in Jew owned Slave markets ?
 
Top