Jews and the New World Order

Coltraine

America First
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
Another good one here that I had highlighted many years ago in this truly unique book that I picked up early on in my red-pill journey. The book is called The Trail of the Serpent, and it is author-less. There is no official author, in other words, for this book. Officially, then, the book's author is labelled on the book itself as strictly just "Inquire Within". It is only after reading the text in full that by the end, then, one begins to finally get a true sense of where the authorship of the book is coming from in terms of perspective and history and time.

Here's free pdf if any of you Stormers out there want to read this for yourselves. I would definitely recommend it for sure:

And here's one of the book's many money-quotes:

We have finally sought to materialise these invisible masters and, allowing the Cabalists to speak for themselves, we arrive at the revolutionary and cabalistic Jew, the most cosmopolitan of peoples, who look for the Coming of their Messianic Era. To some of these the Messiah is their race and their race is their God, the Tetragrammaton, the Creative Principle, this Serpent Power, binding and unifying, leading to the hope of merging all races, all faiths under the Law of this their Unity of Race, thus creating the "Greater Judaism" spoken of by the Jewish World, 9 and 16 February, 1883.
Very similar to the famous quote by Richard Nikolaus Eijiro, Count of Coudenhove-Kalergi where he emphasizes in his book Practical Idealism (1925), written around the same time as The Trail of the Serpent, that the overall long-term agenda was the merging of all races, religions, and governments of the world under the domination of the Jewish race.

So as you can probably already tell, this book is heavy on the Jew-naming. Its early chapters go through a lot of the early history of the Occult and the Ancient Mysteries from in the Egyptian world to the Babylonians to Mithraism to the Gnostics. And then its middle chapters go through early Freemasonry, the Rosicrucians, the Illuminati, and the French Revolution. Eventually, by that point in the text, the reader is already aware that racial Jews are the group controlling pretty much everything and at the tip-top of the power-pyramid. But just to put the icing on the cake, the latter chapters involve topics such as early Communism, Karl Marx, l'Alliance-Israelite-Universelle in France, the Jewish Question itself, and then just the various forms of Freemasonry taken over by Jewry by the first half of the 20th Century when the book was originally written. It was actually written mostly in the 1930s as articles originally appearing in a magazine of some kind called 'The Patriot', and then only later on transferred into book format. The whole Trail of the Serpent book was then a sequel to another book originally based on earlier articles in the same 'The Patriot' magazine, and that first book in the series was/is called Light Bearers of Darkness (of which I have never read myself). But by the end of the text, the reader is able to finally realize that the true authorship of both books is a former initiate of some kind himself, who was then acting as a whistle-blower for what all the various sects of Freemasonry and World Government were all colluding and conspiring about during that time to eventually bring about today in our own time.

That's the craziest thing about insider type books like this in my opinion. They were eagerly speaking back in the early 20th Century about events that were only just then being prepared in their time, but these global events line up perfectly as a historical and ideological continuity that so stubbornly persists up until our own time here in the early 21st Century with all the various Globalist groups like the Council on Foreign Relations, the World Economic Forum, the United Nations, etc.

Anyway, I hope others here read portions from the book in the link directly above. I am going to be sifting through it again myself over the coming days in order to check for anymore "money-quotes" relating directly to the Jews and their planned New World Order. So the one above is hopefully just the first of many to come. Here's the book's cover by the way:

1611874531236.png

Notice the appropriate "anti-Semitic" imagery on the cover with the entire world being strangled by World Jewry- represented of course by the snake. It's interesting that nowhere in this book that I have found as of right now is the Protocols of the Elders of Zion text mentioned- even though the Protocols had definitely been widely published and known by this time in the 1930s when this book was originally printed. I wouldn't necessarily read anything too deep into that. It just struck me as odd considering the themes and historical overlap covered at the micro- level in both texts.
 
Last edited:

Coltraine

America First
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
Jews in Alexandria were ardent propagandists during the period [B.C. 200-50 A.D. roughly], describing themselves as "philosophers", eager to make proselytes, and for this purpose they endeavored to adapt their Judaism to Hellenism [or rather vice-versa], persuaded as they were that without the [Jewish] Law and without Israel to practice it, the world would cease to be; the world would be happy only when finally subject to this universal [Jewish] Law, that is, to the Empire of the Jew.
The quote above is from the early 20th Century Frenchman George Batault in his book La Probleme Juif.

So this Frenchman wrote this book in 1921 called 'The Jewish Problem' basically, and I am finding excerpts now from Batault's book in the Trail of the Serpent book that I already linked up above in my last entry to this thread. It looks like a pretty awesome book from what I gather- although it's in French and it's so old (and memory-holed by Jews- of course- that I cannot even locate a single copy for sale currently). If any French-reading Stormer reads this in the future and has a link to a free pdf, I'd appreciate the heads up- of course. But I've always had a special interest in that period where Greek Philosophy flourished throughout the Middle East and especially for when/if the Greeks ever came into contact with Jewry especially in cities like Alexandria. I believe there's a lot still to learn about this period which could aid us in our current and future dealings with the Jewish Problem.

Anyway, this writer is explaining a lot about how the Alexandrian Jews of the time immediately preceding Jesus Christ were just these hardcore propagandists, philosophical con-artists, plagiarists, and thieves, and especially literary charlatans. This was a time, remember, when the Jews of that period were trying (in their own heads- at least) to compete with the far superior Greeks over whose religion and teachings were more truly "ancient" as well as whose was really the one closest to God/Truth/Logos or whatever. Important to note, here, is that the Greeks never considered the Jews worthy of this challenge, but the Jews themselves completely bought into it, and it was their number one agenda back then to usurp the Greeks in terms of philosophical and literary primacy in the ancient world. And so to this end one thing the Jews would commonly do is back-date their writings in order to make them seem much more ancient than they actually were in reality. Batault gives many good examples of this. Far too many to list here.

Another thing these Jew propagandists in Alexandria would commonly do is tell the gullible and naive of that day who would listen to them that the great Greek Philosophers of the past such as Pythagoras, Plato, Aristotle, and Socrates had actually derived all of their great teachings from the ancient Jews! And Batault is explaining a lot of that in this current excerpt from his own book. He demonstrates how even contemporary Jew writers such as Bernard Lazare in his book L'Antisemitisme had agreed with this premise of the Jews trying to more or less co-opt the more ancient Greek Philosophers and their entire philosophy too for themselves. He quotes Lazare and other more recent Jewish writers to back up his own theme.

Anyway, throughout this entire "falsification of history/philosophy" theme that Batault is building on in the book, he actually provides us with more than a few good quotes- often from Jewish sources too- about the Jews' own compulsion and desire to unify and consolidate the entire world under Pax Judaica, or in other words exactly what we've been referring now in this whole entire thread so far to as the Jew World Order. The following is another great quote along that line.

Alexandra, newly built, was colonized by the Jews, who came in crowds of people to the new town. The result was a mixture of men of different nations and religions, who gave rise to several philosophical and religious associations. Platonism was publicly taught by the Greeks in Alexandria, and it was eagerly received by the Alexandrian Jews at that time, who communicated it to the Jews of Judea and Palestine. However, distorting texts in order to bring out of them what they desired is the only "philosophy" or "science" that can be traced to the Jews. It became in the hands of the Judeo-Alexandrians a formidable arm which, by the perfidious force of their veiled lies, enrolled Hellenism, in spite of itself, into the service of the exclusivism and the religious proselytism of the Jews! This well-documented attempt by the Jewish Alexandrians to Judaize Hellenism, which today appears to us so perfectly absurd and disastrous, has had, nevertheless, the result of obscuring the intelligence of humanity for hundreds of years!
And this continues upon that same theme:
The philosophies of Pythagoras and Plato had thrust deep roots among the Jews, which gave rise to several future heterodox sects stretching from Egypt to Judea such as the Essenes, Therapeuts, Sadducees, Carpocratians, Gnostics, Basilideans, and Manichaeans; all these dogmatists adapted part of the doctrine they encountered originally in Alexandria and then spread in time into Asia, Africa, and even Europe. These different Hellenistic-inspired versions of Judaism were eventually to be preserved even in European Freemasonry! The mysteries of the "Temple of Solomon" in time were transformed [and hidden from the Church] into the Freemasonic allegory of the "Grand Architect", who in all reality was [really just] the Jewish Messiah, who would one day in the future come to deliver the Jews and grant them their rightful place in dominating the rest of humanity. This is an idea still preserved by both the Jews and Freemasons today.
That last excerpt is pretty powerful in my opinion. It documents the historical and mystical continuity that exists even still today between the re-building of the Temple in Jerusalem with the Freemasonic "Grand Architect of the Universe" with just simply the traditional Jewish Messiah. And as Batault informs us bluntly, this Messiah of the Jews is coming to grant Jews domination over the entire world. Which means one-world government, one-world religion, the abolition of all national and regional laws, and the abolition especially of Christianity altogether!

So Batault's writings, here, document for us that all these things were well-known to historians and just to educated Europeans merely a century ago. Affluent and/or intelligent white men from all over Europe and its diaspora knew plenty well that Jews were then openly (and in some manners more discretely too) compelled to construct this New World Order with Jews at the head of it dominating the rest of the nations of the world. These figures knew of the plan, they exposed this plan, and then over the course of the last century or so the Jews just went about memory-holing all these great writings of the past that could have been of use to us here today as well as to our direct forefathers in detecting at a much earlier date what was/is the Jewish Agenda today.

Which is why it is so mandatory that we do everything in our own power today to preserve these writings of the past which expose the Jewish Agenda ourselves!

@fide @Freedom Monk
If you ever get a chance, I think you'd appreciate some of these quotations. Because these quotes directly above may represent the most ancient ones we have (besides those written inside of actual Jewish religious texts themselves- of course) of the Jewish agenda for the coming New World Order and what all that finally entails.
 
Last edited:

Coltraine

America First
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
This mysterious illumination of the low grades of Masonry, this hierarchy of which Philalethes Junior* has so jealously guarded the secret, those 'Unknown Superiors' venerated by the Judaizing Martinists and Philalethes, who claim domination over ordinary lodges- is not all that the unbreakable chain which links the Jewish Cabala to Freemasonry, and have we not henceforth the right to suspect the Occult Power hidden behind the Masonic Lodges to be the brain of Judaism which would conquer and dominate the entire world eventually?
The above quote is from another Frenchmen named André Baron, who wrote a book using the pseudonym "Louis Dasté" in the latter half of the 19th Century on the French Revolution and on Freemasonry's dominant role in perpetuating it. I couldn't find too much in English on Baron, but here's his French Wiki at least:


The specific book that the quote originally comes from is his Les Sociétés Secrètes, leur crime depuis les initiés d'Isis jusqu'aux Francs-Maçons modernes, which can be found in pdf format here:


This guy wrote a lot about Freemasonry and about the downfall of the Ancient Regime and the French Revolution, although it looks like most of what he wrote was over a century after these events actually had already taken place. I tend to view people like Baron as just a more Jew-aware and truth-telling version of more famous anti-Masonic authors of the past such as John Robison or the Abbe Barruel. Many prominent people during that time were too afraid to get into the explicit Jewish connection to the Revolutionary upheavals which were engulfing all of Europe at the time, however others such as Baron, above, and people like Nesta Webster and Edith Starr Miller were obviously not.

And while authors like Robison or Barruel would be so quick usually to inform their readers about how, for instance, the big Masonic Conference at Wilhelmsbad in the year of 1782 was according to them the year that Adam Weishapt's Illuminati infiltrated or co-opted all of Continental Freemasonry, what they will usually fail to inform their readership about that others like Baron, Webster, or Miller always will inform us is that it was this same famous Conference (hosted at the Court Jew Meyer Rothschild's castle by the way) which originally officially proclaimed that Jews could now enter the ranks of most Masonic lodges throughout Europe without incurring any major difficulty. And it was largely after this date that, yes, Jews did pour into the rank and file of Freemasonry indeed. Very quickly after this pronouncement, then, history witnesses even all-Jew Masonic sects appearing as if suddenly out of nowhere such as the Young Germany Movement, the Tugenbund, the Asiatic Brethren, and the Elus Coens [see note below]. Also the infamous quasi-Masonic Alliance Israelité Universallé was founded originally in France shortly after this date.

So while the quote above by Baron demonstrates in particular that Jews were viewed by prominent non-Jews during and after the French Revolutionary period as dominating the Freemasonic landscape throughout Europe, what is also evident from that same quote (and many others like it) is that it was already well-known inside and outside of strictly Masonic circles that the long-term explicit Jewish plan had already been to conquer and dominate the entire world anyway.

All this is being sourced second-hand through the Trail of the Serpent book that I mentioned several entries up in this thread.

* Behind the obvious Masonic codename "Philalethes Junior" is the writer Rober Samber, who was a Masonic leader during this time period and who also was a member of the Royal Society of London as well as other more obscure Masonic fraternities such as the 'Elus Coens' ("Elected Priests (Cohens)"), which was a group originating in Bordeaux, France that was highly philo-Semitic, Kaballistic, and Martinist in configuration. So it's safe to say, then, that Samber was basically the Mitch McConnell or the Joe Biden maybe of his own day in terms of his well-known reverence for all things "Jewish". He was not only in a position to know who dominated the lodges, but more importantly his contemporary opinion back then was more than enough to carry the appropriate amount of weight in terms of letting others know as well who dominated the Freemasonic environment.
 
Last edited:

JasonVorhees

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
The quote above is from the early 20th Century Frenchman George Batault in his book La Probleme Juif.

So this Frenchman wrote this book in 1921 called 'The Jewish Problem' basically, and I am finding excerpts now from Batault's book in the Trail of the Serpent book that I already linked up above in my last entry to this thread. It looks like a pretty awesome book from what I gather- although it's in French and it's so old (and memory-holed by Jews- of course- that I cannot even locate a single copy for sale currently). If any French-reading Stormer reads this in the future and has a link to a free pdf, I'd appreciate the heads up- of course. But I've always had a special interest in that period where Greek Philosophy flourished throughout the Middle East and especially for when/if the Greeks ever came into contact with Jewry especially in cities like Alexandria. I believe there's a lot still to learn about this period which could aid us in our current and future dealings with the Jewish Problem.

Anyway, this writer is explaining a lot about how the Alexandrian Jews of the time immediately preceding Jesus Christ were just these hardcore propagandists, philosophical con-artists, plagiarists, and thieves, and especially literary charlatans. This was a time, remember, when the Jews of that period were trying (in their own heads- at least) to compete with the far superior Greeks over whose religion and teachings were more truly "ancient" as well as whose was really the one closest to God/Truth/Logos or whatever. Important to note, here, is that the Greeks never considered the Jews worthy of this challenge, but the Jews themselves completely bought into it, and it was their number one agenda back then to usurp the Greeks in terms of philosophical and literary primacy in the ancient world. And so to this end one thing the Jews would commonly do is back-date their writings in order to make them seem much more ancient than they actually were in reality. Batault gives many good examples of this. Far too many list here.

Another thing these Jew propagandists in Alexandria would commonly do is tell the gullible and naive of that day who would listen to them that the great Greek Philosophers of the past such as Pythagoras, Plato, Aristotle, and Socrates had actually derived all of their great teachings from the ancient Jews! And Batault is explaining a lot of that in this current excerpt from his own book. He demonstrates how even contemporary Jew writers such as Bernard Lazare in his book L'Antisemitisme had agreed with this premise of the Jews trying to more or less co-opt the more ancient Greek Philosophers and their entire philosophy too for themselves. He quotes Lazare and other more recent Jewish writers to back up his own theme.

Anyway, throughout this entire "falsification of history/philosophy" theme that Batault is building on in the book, he actually provides us with more than a few good quotes- often from Jewish sources too- about the Jews' own compulsion and desire to unify and consolidate the entire world under Pax Judaica, or in other words exactly what we've been referring now in this whole entire thread so far to as the Jew World Order. The following is another great quote along that line.



And this continues upon that same theme:


That last excerpt is pretty powerful in my opinion. It documents the historical and mystical continuity that exists even still today between the re-building of the Temple in Jerusalem with the Freemasonic "Grand Architect of the Universe" with just simply the traditional Jewish Messiah. And as Batault informs us bluntly, this Messiah of the Jews is coming to grant Jews domination over the entire world. Which means one-world government, one-world religion, the abolition of all national and regional laws, and the abolition especially of Christianity altogether!

So Batault's writings, here, document for us that all these things were well-known to historians and just to educated Europeans merely a century ago. Affluent and/or intelligent white men from all over Europe and its diaspora knew plenty well that Jews were then openly (and in some manners more discretely too) compelled to construct this New World Order with Jews at the head of it dominating the rest of the nations of the world. These figures knew of the plan, they exposed this plan, and then over the course of the last century or so the Jews just went about memory-holing all these great writings of the past that could have been of use to us here to today as well as to our direct forefathers in detecting at a much earlier date what was/is the Jewish Agenda today.

Which is why it is so mandatory that we do everything in our own power today to preserve these writings of the past which expose the Jewish Agenda ourselves!

@fide @Freedom Monk
If you ever get a chance, I think you'd appreciate some of these quotations. Because these quotes directly above may represent the most ancient ones we have (besides those written inside of actual Jewish religious texts themselves- of course) of the Jewish agenda for the coming New World Order and what all that finally entails.
You should start a blog or website or something, I really like your takes on all the old stuff you dig up, and you always find interesting information.
 

Coltraine

America First
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
NEW REFERENCES TO "WORLD DOMINATION"/"NEW WORLD ORDER"/ETC BY JEWS or BY FAMOUS PEOPLE SPEAKING ABOUT JEWS:

WELLS, H. G. 20th Century British writer:
"The Jews looked for a special savior, a messiah, who was to redeem mankind by the agreeable process of restoring the fabulous glories of David and Solomon, and bringing the whole world at last under the firm but benevolent Jewish heel."
(The Outline of History)

GOLDWIN SMITH, 19th/20th Century Professor of Modern History at Oxford:
"The Jew alone regards his race as superior to humanity, and looks forward not to its ultimate union with other races, but to its triumph over them all and to its final ascendancy under the leadership of a tribal Messiah."
(Nineteenth Century Magazine, October 1881)

POPE BENEDICT XV:
[warned, in 1920, against] . . . "the advent of a Universal Republic which is longed for by all the worst elements of disorder."
(this is resented by some Jews because of their active sponsorship and direction of such projects as the League of Nations and United Nations.—And in effect, all Popes who have issued editions of the Index Expurgatorius, in which Jewish genocidal and anti-Christian writings are condemned, according to the instructions of the Council of Trent.)
(no explicit source given)

NESTA WEBSTER:
"The Jewish conception of the Jews as the Chosen People who must eventually rule the world forms indeed the basis of Rabbinical Judaism... The Jewish religion now takes its stand on the Talmud rather than on the Bible."
(Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, page 370)

MAJOR ROBERT H. WILLIAMS:
"B'nai B'rith, the secret Jewish fraternity, was organized in 1843, awakening world Jewish aspirations, or Zionism, and its name, meaning "Sons of the Covenant," suggests that the 12 men who organized the fraternity aimed at bringing about the fulfillment of "the Covenant," or the supposed Messianic promise of rulership over all peoples. To rule all peoples, it is first necessary to bring them together in a world federation or world government—which is the avowed aim of both Communists and Zionists."
(The Jewish Utopia, page 44)

ADRIEN ARCAND:
"When it came to Mexico, the promoters of Communism were the Jews Calles, Hubermann and Aaron Saenz; in Spain we saw Azaa and Rosenberg; in Hungary we saw Bela Kun, Szamuelly, Agoston and dozen other Jews; in Bavaria, we saw Kurt Eisner and a host of other Jews; in Belgium Marxian Socialism brought to power Vadervelde alias Epstein, and Paul Hymans, two Jews; in France, Marxian Socialism brought forth the Jews Leon Blum (who showed so well his Jewish instincts in his filthy book Du Mariarge), Mandel, Zyromsky, Danain and a whole tribe of them; in Italy we had seen the Jews Nathan and Claudio Treves. Everywhere, Marxism brings Jews on the top—And this is no hazard."
(New York speech, October 30, 1937)

Thanks to @Walter by the way for posting these quotes up in one of the other comment threads here. I've seen them before obviously, but I found a few in there that I have pasted now immediately above which speak more towards the overall theme in this thread as a whole.

That last one isn't really explicit, but I included it anyway, because there's some names in there relating to Jewish connections to Communism in some of the more obscure countries that we don't normally talk about that I want to do some future research on whenever I have more time. I have about a half-dozen other newer entries that I want to soon paste in this thread too, but they are coming out of books that I've read recently, and so they just aren't as easy to copy/paste as these few directly above. I will get to that as soon as I have more time.

I'm actually re-reading the Nesta Webster book talked about above right now on my own time too, so I'll see if I can dig up any more of her good quotes from that as I read it. And I have read the book by Major Robert H. Williams too in the past called The Jewish Utopia. I'm pretty sure I commented extensively on that particular book somewhere above in this exact thread. The Goldwin Smith quote is also one that you hear a lot in our circles. I have a biography of him that I'd like to eventually get to that's been sitting on my bookshelf collecting dust for probably five years or so now.

Anyway, I should be back again soon with quotes coming from hard-copies that I already have highlighted in book format in regards to Jews and what they've said in the past regarding their New World Order, or what famous non-Jews have at least said about them in that regard. Hopefully since I've actually read the full context, then, of these future quotes from the actual book, I plan on having much more informed and extensive commentary of my own on them afterwards as well.
 
Last edited:

GoodOlboY

In remembrance of American Martyr, Ashli Babbit.
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻
NEW REFERENCES TO "WORLD DOMINATION"/"NEW WORLD ORDER"/ETC BY JEWS or BY FAMOUS PEOPLE SPEAKING ABOUT JEWS:

WELLS, H. G. 20th Century British writer:

(The Outline of History)

GOLDWIN SMITH, 19th/20th Century Professor of Modern History at Oxford:

(Nineteenth Century Magazine, October 1881)

POPE BENEDICT XV:

(no explicit source given)

NESTA WEBSTER:

(Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, page 370)

MAJOR ROBERT H. WILLIAMS:

(The Jewish Utopia, page 44)

ADRIEN ARCAND:

(New York speech, October 30, 1937)

Thanks to @Walter by the way for posting these quotes up in one of the other comment threads here. I've seen them before obviously, but I found a few in there that I have pasted now immediately above which speak more towards the overall theme in this thread as a whole.

That last one isn't really explicit, but I included it anyway, because there's some names in there relating to Jewish connections to Communism in some of the more obscure countries that we don't normally talk about that I want to do some future research one whenever I have more time. I have about a half-dozen other newer entries that I want to soon paste in this thread too, but they are coming out of books that I've read recently, and so they just aren't as easy to copy/paste as these few directly above. I will get to that as soon as I have more time.

I'm actually re-reading the Nesta Webster book talked about above right now on my own time too, so I'll see if I can dig up any more of her good quotes from that as I read it. And I have read the book by Major Robert H. Williams too in the past called The Jewish Utopia. I'm pretty sure I commented extensively on that particular book somewhere above in this exact thread. The Goldwin Smith quote is also one that you hear a lot in our circles. I have a biography of him that I'd like to eventually get to that's been sitting on my bookshelf collecting dust for probably five years or so now.

Anyway, I should be back again soon with quotes coming from hard-copies that I already have highlighted in book format in regards to Jews and what they've said in the past regarding their New World Order, or what famous non-Jews have at least said about them in that regard. Hopefully since I've actually read the full context, then, of these future quotes from the actual book, I plan on having much more informed and extensive commentary of my own on them afterwards as well.
Such a wealth of information. Thank you.
 

Coltraine

America First
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
"The net which Israel now casts over the terrestrial globe enlarges and extends.... Our power is immense; learn to turn that power to our cause. The day is not distant when all the riches, all the treasures of the earth, will become the property of the children of Israel."
- Isaac-Jacob Adolphe Crémieux, Jew; famous 19th Century French politician and high-ranking Freemason; founder and president of L'Alliance-israélite-universelle in 1860


Quote above comes second-hand out of the Trail of the Serpent book that I've used now quite a bit in some of the preceding quotations used on this page. Crémieux was an extremely important personage in the Judeo-Masonic agenda and conspiracy throughout Europe during the 19th Century. I have a good biography of him as well which gets into a lot more of his meta-historical biography as far as his achievements and his beliefs. He was just part of this radical, revolutionary generation of Jews who came up originally during the 1820s and this collective which he was largely at the center of would go on during the century to basically set all of Europe ablaze in revolutionary fire.

1615409363652.png

The biography written by one S. Posener way back in 1940 explains how Crémieux basically single-handedly created and founded L'Alliance-israélite-universelle, the original globalist and Jewish "think-tank", which much of the Protocols of Zion and other key texts of counter-Semitic lore have allegedly been modelled on originally. The Alliance was based in Paris, France, and it was sort of like the Anti-Defamation League but earlier in time and much more global. It still exists today. And during Crémieux's time there as president, the Alliance was able to cover-up the Damascus (Syria) ritual-murder by Jews of a Catholic priest and his colleagues during the year 1840. That is an impressive story in and of itself if you know any of that history, which I won't bother to go into here for brevity's sake.

1615403409670.png

But yeah Crémieux was basically like the French version of England's own Jew politician in Benjamin Disraeli or the American South's version at that time in Judah P. Benjamin. He dominated all State affairs in politics during the Second French Republic serving multiple official positions throughout. And he was the head of French Freemasonry too during much of this time. So he would have been the Jew to know all the most insider type stuff at the most up-to-date occasion. Under his lead, for example, the revolutionary gains allotted by the original French Revolution in 1790 were extended far beyond the limits that people like Napoleon had originally rolled back during his own time in France as Emperor. Crémieux for instance basically directed the French Revolution of 1848 and no doubt was on the inside of all the other revolutionary outbursts which happened that year elsewhere throughout the Continent.

He also had a huge role in guaranteeing "Jewish Emancipation" in other lands through his official presence in the French State and Diplomatic apparatus. So he bribed and bullied Romania and Poland and Russia as well as various German principalities at the time to either grant or extend Jewish Rights, and oftentimes the way Crémieux went about this was basically like: give the Jews in Romania, Poland, etc every single thing they want, or else Crémieux would get the French Revolutionary Regime to start a war against their backward, racist country! That's exactly what he did in the original case of the Damascus Affair as well, basically demonstrating early Jewish and Freemasonic dominance even over the Vatican and over the Ottoman Empire too at that time. He was basically living at a time when Jewish Power had really began to step out and really assert itself forcefully upon the stage of global affairs during the mid-19th Century, and he personified so many of the new, radical changes that were taking place then all across Jew-occupied Europe. All in all he's a fascinating figure to research, which I would encourage Stormers to do themselves.

Obviously, in the quote highlighted above, then, Crémieux is basically imploring his fellow Jews and other revolutionaries to "Step on the Gas!" and go even further and harder than they ever had prior or that they were even doing currently. So in that context I'd say that it's a fascinating document to the burgeoning political power of the then-nascent Jew World Order. Certainly the 20th Century would have ended up nowhere near as "good for Jewry" had it not been for the previous 19th Century's immense gains largely accomplished through figures such as Crémieux, Disraeli, and Judah P. Benjamin on the legit side of world politics while being flanked on the illegitimate side of things by other, even more radical Jews like Karl Marx, Heinrich Heine, Ludwig Borne, and Moses Hess to name just a few.
 
Last edited:

Coltraine

America First
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
This next quote in many ways builds off the of the previous one by Isaac-Jacob Adolphe Crémieux directly above. It also comes from the same book (The Trail of the Serpent) but within a different section of it dealing specifically with L'Alliance-israélite-universelle.


In 1869, in his infamous book Le Juif, le Judaisme et la Judaisation des Peuples Chretiens, the Chevalier Roger Gougenot des Mousseaux wrote:

"The anti-religious but, above all, anti-Christian efforts which distinguish the present epoch have a character of concentration and universality which marks the stamp of the Jew, the supreme patron of the unification of all peoples, because he is the cosmopolitan people par excellence; because the Jew prepares by the license of the libre-pensée, the era called by him 'Messianic'-- the day of his universal triumph. He attributes its near realization to the principles spread by the philosophers of the eighteenth century; the men at once unbelievers and cabalists, whose work prepared the entire Judaizing of the world. The character of universality will be noted in L'Alliance-israélite-universelle, in the Universal Association of Freemasonry, and in the more recent auxiliaries, L'Alliance-universelle-religieuse, open to those who are still frightened off by the name of Israelite and finally in the Ligue-universelle de l'enseignement...."
L'Alliance-israélite-universelle, as detailed a little bit above in my last comment, was sort of like this 19th Century pro-Jewish "think-tank" in terms of its vast revolutionary association of defense, attack, and global propaganda networks and capabilities. It was founded in 1869 by the Globalist French Jew Adolphe Crémieux, who was at that time Sovereign Grandmaster of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, and thus the highest dignity of Masonry in all of France as well as on the Continent itself. The Alliance arose out of the spread of the revolutionary and Reformed [a more liberal branch of Judaism] libre-pensée movement of the middle 19th Century. It's dogmas were basically those of Freemasonry and of Occultism. Another way to think of this is that the Alliance was like the official Jewish interface globally with the non-Jewish world. That may be the single best way to think of it actually. For instance, below is a newer book available about the history of the Alliance specifically in the country of Morocco:

1615408097035.png

From another anti-Semite, Edouard Drumont's 1886 book called La France Juive, we draw the following information about this same Alliance. It's founder, Adolphe Crémieux, was an important leader of early French "Democracy" and of Liberal and Revolutionary politics as a whole, and he more than any other person living at that time gave a strictly Jewish character to the larger French Revolutionary Movement. From Drumont's book, we get the below quote as well:

"He [Crémieux] prepared and loudly proclaimed, during the last years of his life, the [Jewish] Messianic reign [of the traditional Christian Anti-Christ], the time so long expected when all nations will be finally subject to Israel and all men will work for the representatives of the race originally blessed by Jehovah."
So between Roger Gougenot des Mousseaux in that first quote above and then Edouard Drumont there in that second, I think along with the previous quote by Adolphe Crémieux himself that this distinctly paints the picture for the time period in question. And after seeing all the French Revolutionary activity from 1790 onward throughout Europe during their lifetimes, these Jews like Crémieux (and the Jew Heine would eventually proclaim something similar) were already formally and publicly proclaiming the advent of the Jewish Messiah, which is the Christian Anti-Christ- because they were at that time so over-confident and so zealous in their globalist mission to finally take over the whole entire world with the non-Jews as their slaves. All around them at that time they witnessed the Old World Order completely collapsing. They were causing the collapse in fact. The destruction of both Monarchy and Church- I mean. So these largely atheist Jews were even at this early date proclaiming the advent of the Jewish Messiah, which a lot of Jews merely believed during that day and even still today is nothing more than the Jewish race as a whole.

And while I've read a biography of Drumont, in particular, Frederick Busi's The Pope of Antisemitism: The Career and Legacy of Edouard-Adolphe Drumont, I have still never been able to find complete English translations of either his famous book from French or that of des Mousseaux either, both of which I'd eventually like to read someday if any of our French Stormer-bros like @Bernamej or @Drumont or just our other researcher-bros like @Garfisch ever come across anything like that. Please let me know here.
 
Last edited:

Drumont

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽
@Coltraine

You make me feel stupid and ignorant as, as a Frenchman, I had never heard of Roger Gougenot des Mousseaux. Shame, shame.

And you are right, there is no English translation of Edouard Drumont's best selling book, La France Juive (Jewish France). I've read it and must say that, unless you are interested in the minutiae of French public life at the end of the 19th century, it can be a bit overwhelming. It's not a theoretical book (which usually stand the test of time better), but a collage of every single thing Jews did to consolidate their power in France throughout the 19th century, and the negative effects it had upon the country's politics and economy.

Regarding Crémieux, in France he is only remembered for one thing : the "Décret Crémieux" of 1870 (Crémieux decree), by which he single handedly, by executive order, gave full French citizenship to the Jews of recently colonized Algeria (of course, in your high school or even college history textbook, they never mention he was himself an activist Jew. I only learnt it when I got into /ourthing/, even though I studied French/Algerian history in a supposedly top college).
Crémieux was a member of a brand new cabinet of the brand new 3rd French Republic, which emerged after the 1870 defeat against Prussia and fall of the 2nd French Empire. So, imagine this : we are in a country in turmoil, where foreign armies (essentially Prussian and Bavarian) are still roaming, humiliated by defeat, and one of the first executive order Crémieux edicts is to help is ethnic brethren in the Southern Mediterranean.

This decree still has real-life consequences for France today : as Algerian Jews miraculously became French citizens in 1870, they all had the opportunity to leave Algeria when the local Moslems gained independence in 1962. Today, some of the most powerful people in France, such as Bernard Henri Lévy (pro-EU, pro-Israel left-wing neocon intellectual), Jacques Attali (prophet of globalization, who unironically called for a one-world government seated in Jerusalem) or even Eric Zemmour (unfortunately the only truly based right-wing pundit allowed on French TV these days) are all Algerian Jews. They gained access to France, its economy and its universities thanks to Crémieux and is weaselly decree.
 

Bernamej

French Builder of Time Machine to Save Baby Hitler
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
Escaped True Master
This next quote in many ways builds off the of the previous one by Isaac-Jacob Adolphe Crémieux directly above. It also comes from the same book (The Trail of the Serpent) but within a different section of it dealing specifically with L'Alliance-israélite-universelle.


In 1869, in his infamous book Le Juif, le Judaisme et la Judaisation des Peuples Chretiens, the Chevalier Roger Gougenot des Mousseaux wrote:



L'Alliance-israélite-universelle, as detailed a little bit above in my last comment, was sort of like this 19th Century pro-Jewish "think-tank" in terms of its vast revolutionary association of defense, attack, and global propaganda networks and capabilities. It was founded in 1869 by the Globalist French Jew Adolphe Crémieux, who was at that time Sovereign Grandmaster of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, and thus the highest dignity of Masonry in all of France as well as on the Continent itself. The Alliance arose out of the spread of the revolutionary and Reformed [a more liberal branch of Judaism] libre-pensée movement of the middle 19th Century. It's dogmas were basically those of Freemasonry and of Occultism. Another way to think of this is that the Alliance was like the official Jewish interface globally with the non-Jewish world. That may be the single best way to think of it actually. For instance, below is a newer book available about the history of the Alliance specifically in the country of Morocco:

View attachment 47793

From another anti-Semite, Edouard Drumont's 1886 book called La France Juive, we draw the following information about this same Alliance. It's founder, Adolphe Crémieux, was an important leader of early French "Democracy" and of Liberal and Revolutionary politics as a whole, and he more than any other person living at that time gave a strictly Jewish character to the larger French Revolutionary Movement. From Drumont's book, we get the below quote as well:



So between Roger Gougenot des Mousseaux in that first quote above and then Edouard Drumont there in that second, I think along with the previous quote by Adolphe Crémieux himself that this distinctly paints the picture for the time period in question. And after seeing all the French Revolutionary activity from 1790 onward throughout Europe during their lifetimes, these Jews like Crémieux (and the Jew Heine would eventually proclaim something similar) were already formally and publicly proclaiming the advent of the Jewish Messiah, which is the Christian Anti-Christ- because they were at that time so over-confident and so zealous in their globalist mission to finally take over the whole entire world with the non-Jews as their slaves. All around them at that time they witnessed the Old World Order completely collapsing. They were causing the collapse in fact. The destruction of both Monarchy and Church- I mean. So these largely atheist Jews were even at this early date proclaiming the advent of the Jewish Messiah, which a lot of Jews merely believed during that day and even still today is nothing more than the Jewish race as a whole.

And while I've read a biography of Drumont, in particular, Frederick Busi's The Pope of Antisemitism: The Career and Legacy of Edouard-Adolphe Drumont, I have still never been able to find complete English translations of either his famous book from French or that of des Mousseaux either, both of which I'd eventually like to read someday if any of our French Stormer-bros like @Bernamej or @Drumont or just our other researcher-bros like @Garfisch ever come across anything like that. Please let me know here.
I’ve said it before and will say it again, I’m putting your references on my list. Right now I’m physically struggling to keep up with everything. Hopefully will be back soon.
 

Walter

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿
I haven´t read the whole thread yet. Maybe someone already posted this.

Benjamin H. Freedman's excellent speech on how World War One (and Two) really started and why the U.S. was eventually drawn



 

Coltraine

America First
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
I haven´t read the whole thread yet. Maybe someone already posted this.

Benjamin H. Freedman's excellent speech on how World War One (and Two) really started and why the U.S. was eventually drawn



It's been posted at least twice- I know- in this thread already.

But it's cool because YouTube keeps deleting it anyway. And so then somebody reposts it once again.

What would actually be great is if we could have Freedman's words transcribed here even without the video and/or audio. That way we would be positive that we had this material for posterity.

The Freedman speech was, like, personally one of the original major red-pills that got me seriously looking at this stuff, I remember, in the very beginning.
 

Garfisch

Right-Wing Normalist.
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️
And while I've read a biography of Drumont, in particular, Frederick Busi's The Pope of Antisemitism: The Career and Legacy of Edouard-Adolphe Drumont, I have still never been able to find complete English translations of either his famous book from French or that of des Mousseaux either, both of which I'd eventually like to read someday if any of our French Stormer-bros like @Bernamej or @Drumont or just our other researcher-bros like @Garfisch ever come across anything like that. Please let me know here.
Antelope Hill publishing is a current imprint on 'our side' looking to publish translations of important historic texts.

What would actually be great is if we could have Freedman's words transcribed here even without the video and/or audio. That way we would be positive that we had this material for posterity.
Ting, ting! <ahem!>
(Sadly too many characters to post in entirety in one post, so follows below!.....)
 
Last edited:

Garfisch

Right-Wing Normalist.
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️
Benjamin H Freedman’s speech in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C.

Ladies and gentlemen, you are about to hear a very frightening speech. This speech is an explanation of the plans now being laid to throw the United States into a third world war. It was made a short time ago before a large group in the Congressional `Room of the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C. Both the speech and the question and answer period later so electrified the audience that a group of patriots has transferred it to two long-playing records which you may buy to play for friends, clubs, and your church group in your community. The speaker is Mr. Benjamin Freedman, noted authority on Zionism and all of its schemes. Mr. Freedman is a former Jew, and I mean a FORMER Jew. He has fought the Communist world conspiracy tooth and nail, and stands today as a leading American patriot. We now take you to the speaker's platform to present Benjamin Freedman.

(applause)

[Freedman's speech]

What I intend to tell you tonight is something that you have never been able to learn from any other source, and what I tell you now concerns not only you, but your children and the survival of this country and Christianity. I'm not here just to dish up a few facts to send up your blood pressure, but I'm here to tell you things that will help you preserve what you consider the most sacred things in the world: the liberty, and the freedom, and the right to live as Christians, where you have a little dignity, and a little right to pursue the things that your conscience tells you are the right things, as Christians. Now, first of all, I'd like to tell you that on August 25th 1960 -- that was shortly before elections -- Senator Kennedy, who is now the President of the United States, went to New York, and delivered an address to the Zionist Organization of America. In that address, to reduce it to its briefest form, he stated that he would use the armed forces of the United States to preserve the existence of the regime set up in Palestine by the Zionists who are now in occupation of that area. In other words, Christian boys are going to be yanked out of their homes, away from their families, and sent abroad to fight in Palestine against the Christian and Moslem Arabs who merely want to return to their homes. And these Christian boys are going to be asked to shoot to kill these innocent [Arab Palestinians] people who only want to follow out fifteen resolutions passed by the United Nations in the last twelve years calling upon the Zionists to allow these people to return to their homes. Now, when United States troops appear in the Middle East to fight with the Zionists as their allies to prevent the return of these people who were evicted from their homes in the 1948 armed insurrection by the Zionists who were transplanted there from Eastern Europe... when that happens, the United States will trigger World War III. You say, when will that take place? The answer is, as soon as the difficulty between France and Algeria has been settled, that will take place. As soon as France and Algeria have been settled, that will take place. As soon as France and Algeria have settled their difficulty, and the Arab world, or the Moslem world, has no more war on their hands with France, they are going to move these people back into their homes, and when they do that and President Kennedy sends your sons to fight over there to help the crooks hold on to what they stole from innocent men, women and children, we will trigger

Benjamin H Freedman – Speech at the Willard Hotel Page 2 of 18

World War III; and when that starts you can be sure we cannot emerge from that war a victor. We are going to lose that war because there is not one nation in the world that will let one of their sons fight with us for such a cause. I know and speak to these ambassadors in Washington and the United Nations -- and of the ninety-nine nations there, I've consulted with maybe seventy of them -- and when we go to war in Palestine to help the thieves retain possession of what they have stolen from these innocent people we're not going to have a man there to fight with us as our ally. And who will these people have supporting them, you ask. Well, four days after President Kennedy -- or he was then Senator Kennedy -- made that statement on August 28, 1960, the Arab nations called a meeting in Lebanon and there they decided to resurrect, or reactivate, the government of Palestine, which has been dormant more or less, since the 1948 armed insurrection by the Zionists. Not only that... they ordered the creation of the Palestine Army, and they are now drilling maybe a half a million soldiers in that area of the world to lead these people back to their homeland. With them, they have as their allies all the nations of what is termed the Bandung Conference Group. That includes the Soviet Union and every Soviet Union satellite. It includes Red China; it includes every independent country in Asia and Africa; or eighty percent of the world's total population. Eighty percent of the world's population. Four out of five human beings on the face of the earth will be our enemies at war with us. And not alone are they four out of five human beings now on the face of this earth, but they are the non-Christian population of the world and they are the non-Caucasians... the non-white nations of the world, and that's what we face. And what is the reason? The reason is that here in the United States, the Zionists and their coreligionists have complete control of our government. For many reasons too many and too complex to go into here, at this time, I'll be glad to answer questions, however, to support that statement -- the Zionists and their co-religionists rule this United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country. Now, you say, 'well, that's a very broad statement to make', but let me show what happened while you were -- I don't want to wear that out --- let me show what happened while WE were all asleep. I'm including myself with you. We were all asleep. What happened? World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. Nineteen-hundred and fourteen was the year in which World War One broke out. There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, AustriaHungary, and Turkey. What happened? Within two years Germany had won that war: not alone won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean, and Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, stood there with one week's food supply facing her -- and after that, starvation. At that time, the French army had mutinied. They lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was defecting. They were picking up their toys and going home, they didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed.

Benjamin H Freedman – Speech at the Willard Hotel Page 3 of 18

Now Germany -- not a shot had been fired on the German soil. Not an enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, here was Germany offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: “Let's call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started.” Well, England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that. Seriously! They had no choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and being totally defeated. While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and -- I am going to be brief because this is a long story, but I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make if anyone here is curious, or doesn't believe what I'm saying is at all possible -- the Zionists in London went to the British war cabinet and they said: “Look here. You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally.” The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were powerful. They [Zionists] told England: “We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war.” In other words, they made this deal: “We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay us is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, AustriaHungary, and Turkey.” Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain -- that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine -- should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war. However, they made that promise, in October of 1916. October, nineteen hundred and sixteen. And shortly after that -- I don't know how many here remember it -- the United States, which was almost totally pro-German -- totally pro-German -- because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews, and they were pro-German because their people, in the majority of cases came from Germany, and they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar. The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't want Russia to win this war. So the German bankers -- the German-Jews -- Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: “As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!” But they poured money into Germany, they fought with Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime. Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, they went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, like the traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a

Benjamin H Freedman – Speech at the Willard Hotel Page 4 of 18

sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies' hands. And they were no good. Well, shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany. The Zionists in London sent these cables to the United States, to Justice Brandeis: “Go to work on President Wilson. We're getting from England what we want. Now you go to work, and you go to work on President Wilson and get the United States into the war." And that did happen. That's how the United States got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we had no more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room. Now the war -- World War One -- in which the United States participated had absolutely no reason to be our war. We went in there -- we were railroaded into it -- if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into - - that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. Now, that is something that the people in the United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into World War One. Now, what happened? After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: “Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war.” Because they didn't know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So they started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, and it was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration. The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. And I don't think I could make it more emphatic than that. Now, that is where all the trouble started. The United States went in the war. The United States crushed Germany. We went in there, and it's history. You know what happened. Now, when the war was ended, and the Germans went to Paris, to the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought to know. Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations that claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, the Jews said, “How about Palestine for us?” And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized, “Oh, that was the game! That's why the United States came into the war.” And the Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered this terrific reparation that was slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and they were determined to get it at any cost. Now, that brings us to another very interesting point. When the Germans realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany. You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times as important in industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this country. You had Mr. Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the

>
 

Garfisch

Right-Wing Normalist.
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️
Benjamin H Freedman – Speech at the Willard Hotel Page 5 of 18

North German Lloyd's and the Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers -- the biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. Now, the Germans felt: “Well, that was quite a sellout.” It was a sellout that I can best compare -- suppose the United States was at war today with the Soviet Union. And we were winning. And we told the Soviet Union: “Well, let's quit. We offer you peace terms. Let's forget the whole thing.” And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union. And throwing them into the war brought about our defeat. A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which man's imagination cannot encompass. Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we thought they were loyal citizens working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it was through them that Red China was brought into the war against us. How would we feel, in the United States against Chinese? I don't think that one of them would dare show his face on any street. There wouldn't be lampposts enough, convenient, to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel. Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. "We've been so nice to them"; and from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here they sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than they wanted Palestine as a socalled “Jewish commonwealth.” Now, Nahum Sokolow -- all the great leaders, the big names that you read about in connection with Zionism today -- they, in 1919, 1920, '21, '22, and '23, they wrote in all their papers -- and the press was filled with their statements -- that "the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought about by our intercession and bringing the United States into the war against them." The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn't that the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious feeling. There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of their religious belief. It was all political. It was economic. It was anything but religious. Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and said “Shema' Yisrael” or “Our Father.” No one cared in Germany any more than they do in the United States. Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due to one thing: that the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat, for no reason at all, because World War One was started against Germany for no reason for which they [Germans] were responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of being successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world trade. You must remember, Germany, at the time of Napoleon, at the time of the French Revolution, what was the German Reich consisted of 300 -- three hundred! -- small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth. Three hundred little separate political entities. And between that time, between the period of . . . between Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state. And within 50 years after that time they became one of the world's great powers. Their navy was rivalling Great Britain's, they were doing business all over the world, they could undersell anybody and make better products. And what happened? What happened as a result of that?

Benjamin H Freedman – Speech at the Willard Hotel Page 6 of 18

There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia that: "We must slap down Germany", because there isn't one historian in the world that can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the map politically. Now, what happened after that? When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew who Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political prisoners. And he wrote back that he found them in very fine condition. They were in excellent shape; everybody treated well. And they were filled with Communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews, because the Jews happened to be maybe 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time. And there were some priests there, and ministers, and labor leaders, Masons, and others who had international affiliations. Now, the Jews sort of tried to keep the lid on this fact. They didn't want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that. So they did take appropriate action against them [against the Jews]. They . . . shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could? They shunned them. The same as we would the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat. Now, after a while, the Jews of the world didn't know what to do, so they called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every country in the world attended in July 1933. And they said to Germany: “You fire Hitler! And you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist, no matter what he was. You can't treat us that way! And we, the Jews of the world, are calling upon you, and serving this ultimatum upon you.” Well, the Germans told them. . . you can imagine. So what did they [the Jews] do? They broke up, and Samuel Untermyer, if the name means anything to people here. . . (You want to ask a question? --- Uh, there were no Communists in Germany at that time. They were called 'Social Democrats.) Well, I don't want to go by what they were called. We're now using English words, and what they were called in Germany is not very material. . . but they were Communists, because in 1917, the Communists took over Germany for a few days. Rosa Luxembourg and Karl Liebknecht, and a group of Jews in Germany took over the government for three days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war, he fled to Holland because he thought the Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia, and that he was going to meet the same fate that the Czar did in Russia. So he left and went to Holland for safety and for security. Now, at that time, when the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, it was quiet, the Jews were working, still trying to get back into their former -- their status -- and the Germans fought them in every way they could, without hurting a hair on anyone's head. The same as one group, the Prohibitionists, fought the people who were interested in liquor, and they didn't fight one another with pistols, they did it every way they could.

Benjamin H Freedman – Speech at the Willard Hotel Page 7 of 18

Well, that's the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And, at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans and there were only 460,000 Jews . . . less than one half of one percent of Germany were Jews. And yet, they controlled all of the press, they controlled most of the economy, because they had come in and with cheap money -- you know the way the Mark was devalued -- they bought up practically everything. Well, in 1933 when Germany refused to surrender, mind you, to the World Conference of Jews in Amsterdam, they broke up and Mr. Untermeyer came back to the United States -- who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the whole conference -- and he went from the steamer to ABC and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he said: "The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them, that will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business." And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. Their labor. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to starve. There just was not enough food for more than one third of the population. Now in this declaration, which I have here, it was printed on page -- a whole page -- in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that: “this economic boycott is our means of self-defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the NRA" . [National Recovery Administration] -- which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless they followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, which of course was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court at that time. Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn't find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the words "made in Germany" on it. In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted. If anyone came in and found a dish marked "made in Germany," they were picketed with signs: "Hitler", "murderer", and so forth, and like -- something like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South. R. H. Macy, which is controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews. . . a woman found stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked "made in Germany". Well, they were cotton stockings. They may have been there 20 years, because since I've been observing women's legs in the last twenty years, I haven't seen a pair with cotton stockings on them. So Macy! I saw Macy boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs saying "MURDERS" and "HITLERITES", and so forth. Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there was nothing.

Benjamin H Freedman – Speech at the Willard Hotel Page 8 of 18

Now, that . . . naturally, the Germans said, "Why, who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and our industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?" They naturally resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews. Why should a German go in and give their money to a storekeeper who was part of a boycott who was going to starve Germany into surrender into the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be? Well, it was ridiculous. That continued for some time, and it wasn't until 1938, when a young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot one of the officials [a German official] that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and having street fights and so forth. Now, for anyone to say that -- I don't like to use the word 'anti-Semitism' because it's meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I'll have to use it -- the only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they were responsible: number one, for World War One; number two, for this world-wide boycott, and number three -- did I say for World War One, they were responsible? For the boycott -- and also for World War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive. In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had decided [that] Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in between. It's going to be Christian or it's going to be Communist. And the Germans decided: "We're going to keep it Christian if possible". And they started to re-arm. And there intention was -- by that time the United States had recognized the Soviet Union, which they did in November, 1933 -- the Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized: "Well, our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong." The same as we in this country are saying today, "Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong." And our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars of your money for defense, they say. Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over control of many other governments of the world. Now, for this country to now be on the verge of a Third World War, from which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT. One million tons of TNT is a megaton. Now, our nuclear bombs have a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT. That was when they were first developed five or six years ago. Now, the nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have. So, what do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished. And why will it take place? It will take place because Act III. . . the curtain goes up on Act III. Act I was World War I. Act II was World War II. Act III is going to be World War III. The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for

Benjamin H Freedman – Speech at the Willard Hotel Page 9 of 18

their world government. Now, that is just as true as I am standing here, because not alone have I read it, but many here have read it, and it's known all over the world. Now, what are we going to do? The life you save may be your son's. Your boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you you don't know it any more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe. Did you know it at that time? Not a person in the United States knew it. You weren't permitted to know it. Who knew it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other 's knew it. Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there. I was 'confidential man' to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the Finance Committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson's brain the graduated income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and also indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement. Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers on this hand, and President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it came to determining what was going on as a newborn baby. And that's how they got us into World War I, while we all slept. Now, at this moment... at this moment they may be planning this World War III, in which we don't stand a chance even if they don't use nuclear bombs. How can the United States -- about five percent of the world -- go out and fight eighty to ninety percent of the world on their home ground? How can we do it... send our boys over there to be slaughtered? For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as their 'commonwealth'? They've fooled you so much that you don't know whether you're coming or going. Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, "Gentlemen, any witness that you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony." That is correct. I don't know from what state you come, but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness said one lie, disregard his testimony. Now, what are the facts about the Jews? The Jews -- I call them Jews to you, because they are known as Jews. I don't call them Jews. I refer to them as so-called Jews, because I know what they are. If Jesus was a Jew, there isn't a Jew in the world today, and if those people are Jews, certainly our Lord and Savior was not one of them, and I can prove that. Now what happened? The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world's population of those people who call themselves Jews, were originally Khazars. They were a warlike tribe that lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into Eastern Europe -- and to reduce this so you don't get too confused about the history of Eastern Europe -- they set up this big Khazar kingdom: 800,000 square miles. Only, there was no Russia, there were no other countries, and the Khazar kingdom was the biggest

>
 

Garfisch

Right-Wing Normalist.
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️
Benjamin H Freedman – Speech at the Willard Hotel Page 10 of 18

country in all Europe -- so big and so powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers. That's how big and powerful they were. Now, they were phallic worshippers, which is filthy. I don't want to go into the details of that now. It was their religion the way it was the religion of many other Pagans or Barbarians elsewhere in the world. Now, the [Khazar] king became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith -- either Christianity, Islam -- the Moslem faith -- or what is known today as Judaism -- really Talmudism. So, like spinning a top and calling out "eeny, meeny, miney, moe," he picked out so-called Judaism. And that became the state religion. He sent down to the Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up thousands of these rabbis with their teachings, and opened up synagogues and schools in his kingdom of 800,000 people -- 800,000 thousand square miles -- and maybe ten to twenty million people; and they became what we call Jews. There wasn't one of them that had an ancestor that ever put a toe in the Holy Land, not only in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of time. Not one of them! And yet they come to the Christians and they ask us to support their armed insurrection in Palestine by saying: "Well, you want to certainly help repatriate God's chosen people to their Promised Land, their ancestral homeland. It's your Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior. You now go to church on Sunday, and kneel and you worship a Jew, and we're Jews." Well, they were pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the Irish [were converted]. And it's just as ridiculous to call them "people of the Holy Land," as it would be. . . there are 54 million Chinese Moslems. Fifty four million! And, Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., so in that time, 54 million Chinese have accepted Islam as their religious belief. Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, where the city of Mecca is located, where Mohammed was born. . . imagine if the 54 million Chinese called themselves 'Arabs'. Imagine! Why, you'd say they're lunatics. Anyone who believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be crazy. All they did was adopt as a religious faith; a belief that had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia. The same as the Irish. When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped them in the ocean and imported from the Holy Land a new crop of inhabitants that were Christians. They weren't different people. They were the same people, but they had accepted Christianity as a religious faith. Now, these Pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns. . . they were a Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe. They likewise, because their king took the faith -- Talmudic faith -- they had no choice. Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain. So everybody -- they lived on the land just like the trees and the bushes; a human being belonged to the land under their feudal system -- so they [Khazars] all became what we call today, Jews! Now imagine how silly it was for the Christians. . . for the great Christian countries of the world to say, "We're going to use our power, our prestige to repatriate God's chosen people to their ancestral homeland, their Promised Land." Now, could there be a bigger lie than that? Could there be a bigger lie than that?

Benjamin H Freedman – Speech at the Willard Hotel Page 11 of 18

And because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the television, the book publishing business, they have the ministers in the pulpit, they have the politicians on the soap boxes talking the same language . . . so naturally you'd believe black is white if you heard it often enough. You wouldn't call ‘black’ black anymore -- you'd start to call black white. And nobody could blame you. Now, that is one of the great lies. . . that is the foundation of all the misery that has befallen the world. Because after two wars fought in Europe -- World War I and World War II -- if it wasn't possible for them to live in peace and harmony with the people in Europe, like their brethren are living in the United States, what were the two wars fought for? Did they have to -- like you flush the toilet -- because they couldn't get along, did they have to say, "Well, we're going back to our homeland and you Christians can help us"? I can't understand yet how the Christians in Europe could have been that dumb because every theologian, every history teacher, knew the things that I'm telling you. But, they naturally bribed them, shut them up with money, stuffed their mouths with money, and now. . . I don't care whether you know all this or not. It doesn't make any difference to me whether you know all these facts or not, but it does make a difference to me. I've got, in my family, boys that will have to be in the next war, and I don't want them to go and fight and die... like they died in Korea. Like they died in Japan. Like they've died all over the world. For what? To help crooks hold on to what they stole from innocent people who had been in peaceful possession of that land, those farms, those homes for hundreds and maybe thousands of years? Is that why the United States must go to war? Because the Democratic Party wants New York State -- the electoral vote? Illinois, the electoral vote? And Pennsylvania, the electoral vote?... which are controlled by the Zionists and their co-religionists?. . . the balance of power? In New York City there are 400,000 members of the liberal party, all Zionists and their co-religionists. And New York State went for Kennedy by 400,000 votes. Now, I don't blame Mr. Kennedy. I'm fond of Mr. Kennedy. I think he's a great man. I think he can really pull us out of this trouble if we get the facts to him. And I believe he knows a great deal more than his appointments indicate he knows. He's playing with the enemy. Like when you go fishing, you've got to play with the fish. Let 'em out and pull 'em in. Let 'em out and pull 'em in. But knowing Mr. Kennedy's father, and how well informed he is on this whole subject, and how close Kennedy is to his father, I don't think Mr. Kennedy is totally in the dark. But I do think that it is the duty of every mother, every loyal Christian , every person that regards the defense of this country as a sacred right, that they communicate -- not with their congressman, not with their senator, but with President Kennedy. And tell him, "I do not think you should send my boy, or our boys, wearing the uniform of the United States of America, and under the flag that you see here, our red, white and blue, to fight there to help keep in the hands of these that which they have stolen". I think everyone should not alone write once, but keep writing and get your friends to write. Now, I could go on endlessly, and tell you these things to support what I have just asked you to do. But I don't think it's necessary to do that. You're above the average group in intelligence and I don't think it's necessary to impress this any more. But. . . I want to tell you one more thing. You talk about... "Oh, the Jews. Why the Jews? Christianity. Why, we got Christianity from the Jews and the Jews gave us Jesus, and the Jews gave us

Benjamin H Freedman – Speech at the Willard Hotel Page 12 of 18

our religion". But do you know that on the day of atonement that you think is so sacred to them, that on that day... and I was one of them! This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser. I'm here to give you facts. When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, the very first prayer that you recite, you stand -- and it's the only prayer for which you stand -- and you repeat three times a short prayer. The Kol Nidre. In that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months -- any oath, vow or pledge that you may take during the next twelve months shall be null and void. The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge. They shall have no force and effect, and so forth and so on. And further than that, the Talmud teaches: "Don't forget -- whenever you take an oath, vow, and pledge -- remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and that exempts you from fulfilling that". How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon their loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916. And we're going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the same reason. You can't depend upon something as insecure as the leadership that is not obliged to respect an oath, vow or pledge. Now I could go on and recite many other things to you, but I would have a little respect for your time, and you want to really, uh, get through with all of this. Tomorrow's going to be a long day. Now I want to say one thing. You ask me. . . well, you think to yourself: "well how did this fellow get mixed up in this the way he got mixed up in it." Well, I opened my mouth in 1945, and I took big pages in newspapers and tried to tell the American people what I'm telling you. And one newspaper after another refused the advertisement. And when I couldn't find a newspaper to take them -- I paid cash, not credit -- what happened? My lawyer told me, "There's an editor over in Jersey with a paper who will take your announcement". So, I was brought together with Mr. McGinley, and that's how I met him. So somebody told me the lawyer who introduced me, who was the son of the Dean of the Methodist Bishop, he said: "Well, I think he's a little anti-Semitic. I don't know whether I can get him over here. So he brought him over to my apartment and we hit it off wonderfully, and have since then. Now, I say this, and I say it without any qualifications. I say it without any reservations. And I say it without any hesitation. . . if it wasn't for the work that Mr. Conley McGinley did with "Common Sense" -- he's been sending out from 1,800,000 to 2,000,000 every year -- if it wasn't for the work he's been doing sending those out for fifteen years now, we would already be a communist country. Nobody has done what he did to light fires. Many of the other active persons in this fight learned all about if for the first time through "Common Sense". Now, I have been very active in helping him all I could. I'm not as flush as I was. I cannot go on spending the money. . . I'm not going to take up a collection. Don't worry. I see five people getting up to leave.

(laughter)

Benjamin H Freedman – Speech at the Willard Hotel Page 13 of 18

I haven't got the money that I used to spend. I used to print a quarter of a million of them out of my own pocket and send them out. Mr. McGinley, when I first met him, had maybe 5,000 printed and circulated them locally. So I said, "With what you know and what I know, we can really do a good job". So I started printing in outside shops of big newspaper companies, a quarter of a million, and paid for them. Well, there's always a bottom to the barrel. I suppose we've all reached that at times. I'm not so poor that I can't live without working and that's what worries the Anti-Defamation League. I can just get by without going and asking for a job or getting on the bread line. But Mr. McGinley is working. He's sick and he's going at this stronger than ever. And all I want to say is that they want to close up "Common Sense" more than any other single thing in the whole world, as a death-blow to the fight Christians are making to survive. So I just want to tell you this. All they do is circulate rumors: "Mr. Benjamin H. Freedman is the wealthy backer of 'Common Sense'." The reason they do that is to discourage the people in the United States: don't send any money to Common Sense. They don't need it. They've got the wealthy Mr. Freedman as a backer. That all has strategy. They don't want to advertise me so that people that have real estate or securities to sell will come and call on me. They just want people to lay off "Common Sense". And all I'm telling you is, I do try to help him, but I haven't been able to. And I will be very honest. One thing I won't do is lie. In the last year I've had so much sickness in my family that I could not give him one dollar. How he's managed to survive, I don't know. God alone knows. And he must be in God's care because how he's pulled through his sickness and with his financial troubles, I don't know. But that press is working. . . and every two weeks about a hundred or a hundred-fifty-thousand of "Common Sense" go out with a new message. And if that information could be multiplied. . . if people that now get it could buy ten or twenty five, or fifty, give them around. Plow that field. Sow those seeds, you don't know which will take root, but for God's sake, this is our last chance. [Freedman then discusses the importance of people forgoing unnecessary purchases to 'buy more stuff', play golf, etc., and use the money to keep "Common Sense" going. He explains that the paper is going in debt; could be closed down and he (Freedman) no longer has the funds, having spent some $2,400,000 in his attempt to bring the information to the American public and elected officials. He then asks for questions from the audience.]

=======================
{Question inaudible]

Freedman: All right, I'll comment on that. This is rather deep, but you all have a very high degree of intelligence, so I'm going to make an attempt. In the time of Bible history, there was a geographic area known as Judea. Judea was a province of the Roman Empire. Now, a person who lived in Judea was known as a Judean, and in Latin it was Judaeus; in Greek it was Judaius. Those are the two words, in Greek and Latin, for a Judean. Now, in Latin and Greek there is no such letter as 'j', and the first syllable of Judaeus and Judaius starts 'ghu'. Now, when the Bible was written, it was first written in Greek, Latin, Panantic, Syriac, Aramaic... all those languages. Never was the word Jew in any of them because the word didn't exist. Judea was the country, and the people were Judeans, and Jesus was referred to only as a Judean. I've seen those early... the earliest scripts available.

Benjamin H Freedman – Speech at the Willard Hotel Page 14 of 18

In 1345, a man by the name of Wycliffe in England thought that it was time to translate the Bible into English. There was no English edition of the Bible because who the Devil could read? It was only the educated church people who could read Latin and Greek, Syriac, Aramaic and the other languages. Anyhow, Wycliffe translated the Bible into English. But in it, he had to look around for some words for Judaeas and Judaius. There was no English word because Judea had passed out of existence. There was no Judea. People had long ago forgotten that. So in the first translation he used the word, in referring to Jesus, as 'gyu', "jew". At the time, there was no printing press. Then, between 1345 and the 17th century, when the press came into use, that word passed through so many changes... I have them all here. If you want I can read them to you. I will. That word 'gyu' which was in the Wycliffe Bible became. . . first it was ' gyu ', then ' giu ', then ' iu ' (because the ' i ' in Latin is pronounced like the ' j '.Julius Caesar is ' Iul ' because there is no 'j' in Latin) then ' iuw ', then ' ieuu ', then ' ieuy ', then ' iwe ', then ' iow ', then ' iewe ', all in Bibles as time went on. Then ' ieue ', then ' iue ', then ' ive ', and then ' ivw ', and finally in the 18th century... ' jew '. Jew. All the corrupt and contracted forms for Judaius, and Judaeas in Latin. Now, there was no such thing as 'Jew', and any theologian -- I've lectured in maybe 20 of the most prominent theological seminaries in this country, and two in Europe -- there was no such word as Jew. There only was Judea, and Jesus was a Judean and the first English use of a word in an English bible to describe him was 'gyu' -- Jew. A contracted and shortened form of Judaeus, just the same as we call a laboratory a 'lab', and gasoline 'gas'... a tendency to short up. So, in England there were no public schools; people didn't know how to read; it looked like a scrambled alphabet so they made a short word out of it. Now for a theologian to say that you can't harm the Jews, is just ridiculous. I'd like to know where in the scriptures it says that. I'd like to know the text. Look at what happened to Germany for touching Jews. What would you, as a citizen of the United States, do to people who did to you what the so-called Jews -- the Pollacks and Litvaks and Litzianers - - they weren't Jews, as I just explained to you. They were Eastern Europeans who'd been converted to Talmudism. There was no such thing as Judaism. Judaism was a name given in recent years to this religion known in Bible history as Torah [inaudible]. No Jew or no educated person ever heard of Judaism. It didn't exist. They pulled it out of the air. . . a meaningless word. Just like 'anti-Semitic'. The Arab is a Semite. And the Christians talk about people who don't like Jews as anti-Semites, and they call all the Arabs anti-Semites. The only Semites in the world are the Arabs. There isn't one Jew who's a Semite. They're all Turkothean Mongoloids. The Eastern european Jews. So, they brainwashed the public, and if you will invite me to meet this reverend who told you these things, I'll convince him and it'll be one step in the right direction. I'll go wherever I have to go to meet him. ======================= Yes, ma'am. Well... I can answer that. First of all, your first premise is wrong. Your first premise that all the Jews are loyal to each other is wrong. Because, the Eastern European Jews outnumber all the

Benjamin H Freedman – Speech at the Willard Hotel Page 15 of 18

rest by so many that they create the impression that they are the Jewish 'race'; that they are the Jewish nation; that they are the Jewish people. . . and the Christians swallow it like a cream puff. But in 1844 the German rabbis called a conference of rabbis from all over the world for the purpose of abolishing the Kol Nidre from the Day of Atonement religious ceremony. In Brunswick, Germany, where that conference was held in 1844, there was almost a terrific riot. A civil war. The Eastern Europeans said, "What the hell. We should give up Kol Nidre? That gives us our grip on our people. We give them a franchise so they can tell the Christians, 'Go to hell. We'll make any deal you want', but they don't have to carry it out. That gives us our grip on our people". So, they're not so united, and if you knew the feeling that exists. . . Now, I'll also show you from an official document by the man responsible for. . . uh, who baptized this race. Here is a paper that we obtained from the archives of the Zionist organization in New York City, and in it is the manuscript by Sir James A. Malcolm, who -- on behalf of the British Cabinet -- negotiated the deal with these Zionists. And in here he says that all the jews in England were against it. The Jews who had been there for years, the [inaudible - probably Sephardim], those who had Portuguese and Spanish ad Dutch ancestry... who were monotheists and believed in that religious belief. That was while the Eastern European Jews were still running around in the heart of Asia and then came into Europe. But they had no more to do with them than. . . can we talk about a Christian 'race'? or a Christian religion?... or are the Christians united? So the same disunity is among the Jews. And I'll show you in this same document that when they went to France to try and get the French government to back that Zionist venture, there was only one Jew in France who was for it. That was Rothschild, and they did it because they were interested in the oil and the Suez Canal

=======================

[Question inaudible]

Freedman: You know why? Because if they don't, they're decked up. They come around and they tell you how much you must give, and if you don't . . . oh, you're anti-Semitic. Then none of their friends will have anything to do with them, and they start a smear campaign. . . and you have got to give. In New York city, in the garment center, there are twelve manufacturers in the building. And when the drive is on to sell Israel Bonds, the United Jewish Drive, they put a big scoreboard with the names of the firms and opposite them, as you make the amount they put you down for, they put a gold star after the name. Then, the buyers are told, "When you come into that building to call on someone and they haven't got a gold star, tell them that you won't buy from them until they have the gold star". BLACKMAIL. I don't know what else you can call it. Then what do they do? They tell you it's for 'humanitarian purposes' and they send maybe $8 billion dollars to Israel, tax exempt, tax deductible. So if they hadn't sent that eight billion dollars to Israel, seven billion of it would have gone into the U.S. Treasury as income tax. So what happens? That seven billion dollars deficit -- that air pocket -- the gullible Christians have to make up.

Benjamin H Freedman – Speech at the Willard Hotel Page 16 of 18

They put a bigger tax on gas or bread or corporation tax. Somebody has to pay the housekeeping expenses for the government. So why do you let these people send their money over there to buy guns to drive people out of their ancient homeland? And you say, "Oh, well. The poor Jews. They have no place to go and they've been persecuted all their lives". They've never been persecuted for their religion. And I wish I had two rows of Rabbis here to challenge me. Never once, in all of history, have they been persecuted for their religion. Do you know why the Jews were driven out of England? King Edward the First in 1285 drove them out, and they never came back until the Cromwell Revolution which was financed by the Rothschilds. For four-hundred years there wasn't a Jew. But do you know why they were driven out? Because in the Christian faith and the Moslem faith it's a sin to charge 'rent' for the use of money. In other words - what we call interest [usury] is a sin. So the Jews had a monopoly in England and they charged so much interest, and when the Lords and Dukes couldn't pay, they [Jews] foreclosed. And they were creating so much trouble that the king of England finally made himself their partner, because when they came to foreclose, some of these dukes bumped off the Jews. . . the money-lenders. So the king finally said -- and this is all in history, look up Tianson [Tennyson?] or Rourke, the History of the Jews in England; two books you can find in your library. When the king found out what the trouble was all about, and how much money they were making, he declared himself a fifty-percent partner of the money lenders. Edward the First. And for many years, one-third of the revenues of the British Treasury came from the fifty-percent interest in money-lending by the Jews. But it got worse and worse. So much worse that when the Lords and Dukes kept killing the moneylenders, the King then said, "I declare myself the heir of all the money-lenders. If they're killed you have to pay me, because I'm his sole heir". That made so much trouble, because the King had to go out and collect the money with an army, so he told the Jews to get out. There were 15,000 of them, and they had to get out, and they went across to Ireland, and that's how Ireland got to be part of the United Kingdom. When King Edward found out what they were doing, he decided to take Ireland for himself before someone else did. He sent Robert Southgard with a mercenary army and conquered Ireland. So, show me one time where a Jew was persecuted in any country because of his religion. It has never happened. It's always their impact on the political, social, or economic customs and traditions of the community in which they settle.

=======================

[Question inaudible]

Freedman: Yes, sir. Well, they say most of those things themselves. It was unnecessary for Benjamin Franklin to say it. Most of those things they say themselves. But Benjamin Franklin observed, and by hearsay understood, what was happening in Europe. When Russia, in 920 was formed, and gradually surrounded the Khazar Kingdom, and absorbed them, most of the well-to-do Khazars fled to Western Europe and brought with them the very things to which you object and I object and a lot of other people object. The customs, the habits, the instincts with which they were endowed. When Benjamin Franklin referred to them as Jews because that's the name that they went by, and when the Christians first heard that these people who were fleeing from Russia -- who they were -- that they

Benjamin H Freedman – Speech at the Willard Hotel Page 17 of 18

had practiced this Talmudic faith -- the Christians in Western Europe said, "They must be the remnants of the lost ten tribes!" And Mr. Grutz, the greatest historian amongst the Jews, said that -- and he's probably as good an authority on that subject as there is. So when Ben Franklin came to Europe in the 18th century, he already saw the results of what these people had done after they left their homeland. And every word of it is true... they say it themselves. I can give you half a dozen books they've written in which they say the same thing: When they have money they become tyrants. And when they become defeated, they become ruthless. They're only barbarians. They're the descendants of Asiatic Mongols and they will do anything to accomplish their purpose. What right did they have to take over Russia the way they did? The Czar had abdicated nine or ten months before that. There was no need for them. . . they were going to have a constitutional monarchy. But they didn't want that. When the constitutional monarchy was to assemble in November, they mowed them all down and established the Soviet Union. There was no need for that. But they thought, "Now is the time", and if you you will look in the Encyclopedia Britannica under the word 'Bolshevism', you'll find the five laws there that Lenin put down for a successful revolution. One of them is, "Wait for the right time, and then give them everything you've got". It would pay you to read that. You'd also find that Mr. Harold Blacktree, who wrote the article for the Encyclopedia Britannica states that the Jews conceived and created and cultivated the Communist movement. And that their energy made them the spearhead of the movement. Harold Blacktree wrote it and no one knew more about Communism than he. And the Encyclopedia Britannica for 25 years has been printing it.

=======================

[Question inaudible]

Freedman: Well, I can't advocate that you do anything that's criminal, but I can tell you this. You can start what I call an endless chain. If you can get your friends to write, objectively, here is the statement: Mr. Kennedy's office gave me this himself. Mr. Smith, who succeeded Mr. Kennedy, took over his office -- was in his office -- and gave me this. He delivered this on the 25th, and it says here: "For release to AM (that means morning papers), August 25th". "Israel is here to stay. It is a national commitment, special obligation of the Democratic Party. The White House must take the lead. American intervention. We will act promptly and decisively against any nation in the Middle East which attacks its neighbor. I propose that we make clear to both Israel and the Arab states our guarantee that we will act with whatever force and speed are necessary to halt any aggression by any nation". Well, do you call the return of people to their homeland [the Arab Palestinians] aggression? Is Mr. Kennedy going to do that? Suppose three million Mexicans came into Texas and drove the six million Texans into the deserts of Arizona and New Mexico. Suppose these Mexicans were slipped in there armed -- the Texans were disarmed -- and one night they drove them all out of Texas and declared themselves the Republic of the Alamo. What would the United States say? Would we say it's aggression for these Texans to try to get their homes back from the Mexican thieves? Suppose the Negroes in Alabama were secretly armed by the Soviets and overnight they rose up and

Benjamin H Freedman – Speech at the Willard Hotel Page 18 of 18

drove all the whites into the swamps of Mississippi and Georgia and Florida. . . drove them out completely, and declared themselves the Republic of Ham, or the Republic of something-or-other. Would we call it aggression if these people, the whites of Alabama, tried to go back to their homes? Would we . . . what would we think if the Soviet Union said, "No, those Negroes now occupy them! Leave them there!", or "No, those Mexicans are in Texas. They declared themselves a sovereign state. Leave them there. You have plenty of room in Utah and Nevada. Settle somewhere else". Would we call it aggression if the Alabama whites or the Texans wanted to go back to their homes? So now, you've got to write to President Kennedy and say, "We do not consider it aggression in the sense that you use the word, if these people want to return to their homes as the United Nations -- fifteen times in the last twelve years -- called upon the Zionists in occupation of Palestine to allow the Arab Palestinians to return to their former homes and farms.”
 

Garfisch

Right-Wing Normalist.
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️
Freedman must've been tired when he accused the Rothschilds of funding Cromwell's re-admittance of the jews to England... either that or he knows something we don't! I presume he means the 'Money Trust', as Charles Lindbergh Sr would have phrased it....
 

Italo-Canadian

Jesus is King
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
even though I studied French/Algerian history in a supposedly top college
Off topic (kind of) but are you familiar with Jean Baudrillard (hyperreality)? I'm reading his book Symbolic Exchange and Death, which is quite fascinating and relevant to our current state of affairs, viz., a fake pandemic that is more "real/dangerous" than prior diseases that killed many more healthy, young people. Also, whenever I read a French philosopher, I always get the impression that they have to prove how brilliant they are by engaging in convoluted, opaque thought processes rather than speaking plainly.
 

Coltraine

America First
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
@Coltraine

You make me feel stupid and ignorant as, as a Frenchman, I had never heard of Roger Gougenot des Mousseaux. Shame, shame.

And you are right, there is no English translation of Edouard Drumont's best selling book, La France Juive (Jewish France). I've read it and must say that, unless you are interested in the minutiae of French public life at the end of the 19th century, it can be a bit overwhelming. It's not a theoretical book (which usually stand the test of time better), but a collage of every single thing Jews did to consolidate their power in France throughout the 19th century, and the negative effects it had upon the country's politics and economy.

Regarding Crémieux, in France he is only remembered for one thing : the "Décret Crémieux" of 1870 (Crémieux decree), by which he single handedly, by executive order, gave full French citizenship to the Jews of recently colonized Algeria (of course, in your high school or even college history textbook, they never mention he was himself an activist Jew. I only learnt it when I got into /ourthing/, even though I studied French/Algerian history in a supposedly top college).
Crémieux was a member of a brand new cabinet of the brand new 3rd French Republic, which emerged after the 1870 defeat against Prussia and fall of the 2nd French Empire. So, imagine this : we are in a country in turmoil, where foreign armies (essentially Prussian and Bavarian) are still roaming, humiliated by defeat, and one of the first executive order Crémieux edicts is to help is ethnic brethren in the Southern Mediterranean.

This decree still has real-life consequences for France today : as Algerian Jews miraculously became French citizens in 1870, they all had the opportunity to leave Algeria when the local Moslems gained independence in 1962. Today, some of the most powerful people in France, such as Bernard Henri Lévy (pro-EU, pro-Israel left-wing neocon intellectual), Jacques Attali (prophet of globalization, who unironically called for a one-world government seated in Jerusalem) or even Eric Zemmour (unfortunately the only truly based right-wing pundit allowed on French TV these days) are all Algerian Jews. They gained access to France, its economy and its universities thanks to Crémieux and is weaselly decree.
In the book that I keep quoting from above (The Trail of the Serpent), there's an interesting part about Algerian Jew and Arab (and French) relations. I wanted to respond to your comment about this topic a week ago, but it's taken me until now really to get the proper time and with the ideal frame of mind too. Sometimes I want to just relax and just shitpost, basically, rather than doing "research" shit like I'm doing here on this thread mainly.

But yeah there's a few relevant quotes here too:
"... We live in France under the law of a taboo; that is, of the Jew... Who will say I exaggerate... in this Algeria where there is no longer a single journal in which the word 'Jew' can even be written with a capital 'J' today... Atheist in the religion of others, international in the country of others, revolutionaries in the society of others, but prodigiously jealous and fiercely conservative in what is their own, their originality, spirit and race, such during half a century have the Jews revealed themselves to my attentive eyes... It is not so much through himself and his deleterious action that the Jew is dangerous, it is by the example he gives, the contagion he exercises, and the spirit he teaches to the unchained masses deprived of direction and too much inclined to imitate... Our 'anti-Semitism', therefore, is not of violence, disorder or recrimination, but of clairvoyance, of methodical protection; our 'anti-Semitism' is of the State, regulations, and laws."
(Charles Hagel, Le Péril Juif, late 19th Century)

The book goes on to give some of the early history of Jewish settlement in Algeria and Northern Africa, but it starts to get really interesting, I think, right about the mid-19th Century.

"From 1830 to 1870 the Jews were judicially and administratively assimilated before being legally and politically incorporated. Covered by French authority and defended by French soldiers, they gave themselves up to their national industry of usury. The Jew was the tempter who brought to the Mussulman, this impulsive, improvident man eager for pleasure, the money to satisfy his passions and pleasures."
Then the author writes about the Crémieux Décret like you talk about in your previous comment. After that the Jews in Algeria "rapidly prospered" it is said in the book. Followed by this:

"...and in 1861 a magistrate declared: "That the Israelites possess a great part of the properties, that the fortunes of the Arabs pass into their hands, and that in the town of Algiers alone one could value their landed worth at more than 12,000,000 francs." Taking advantage of distracted and despairing France after its defeat by the Germans in 1870, the Crémieux Décret for Algerian Jews was voted by an overwhelming majority and without debate."
And:
"The Jews of Algeria overnight became French citizens, and all that France gained was the hatred of her Arab subjects, the only element of value upon which she could count for populating and economically developing the country. The Jews were placed in superiority over them! The Arabs could not accept that result! Towns, villages, farms were pillaged, nationals' throats cut, and the establishments were ruined... From time to time other riots and pillages took place, and that of 1898, more sever than the others, was rigorously suppressed by the Jew-dominated France."
Finally on the same subject of Algeria and its Jewish Problem, the author says:
"... At present the fellah has no longer anything but his dried skin stretched upon his bones, and he must pay the contracts, the banks, and above all the Jew. In Algeria the Jew has powerfully contributed to the disorder of the public mind. Demoralized by him, a quarter of the citizens in large towns openly trade "their rights" away, selling their vote for from 20 to 500 francs or more. The lists are cooked: "At each election... the postal service returns to the mayors thousands of electors' cards marked unknown; gone, no address; dead." The Jews exercise in Algerian economy a submergence of which it can be affirmed that it will destroy all the elite, eliminate all competition, and place at the discretion of this alien, unassimilable, and eternally a stranger, the direction of all the affairs of this country [Algeria] if it is allowed to continue."
So it's good that you brought this topic up originally, because it has allowed me to get out a few of these Algeria-Jewish related quotes that I had just recently re-read once again while working to transcribe the earlier quotes from the same book up above. Like I said, I just hadn't really had the time and the right mood, here, to reply back to you on this subject yet.

It's very interesting to me the many similarities of some of the aspects of the Jewish Problem in Algeria written about above in the Muslim world of the 19th Century with things that are going on today within the Western world. Especially those parts in that last quotation about how elections were being sold and rigged by Jews and how Jews had basically bankrupted the common Algerian peasant at that time. It also reminds me of that famous quote by Bakunin about how the Jews just desire to get the monopoly over absolutely everything, and how it doesn't matter to the Jew whether they attain that monopoly in the form of either Communism or Capitalism whatsoever. The aim, in the end, is more or less the same always. Well, it was through the Capitalistic State in France that Jews originally were able to get their various monopolies over Algeria whether economically or politically or culturally or otherwise. Because the French military there protected the Jews as we have seen from any real reprisals from the Arab world. Just like our own modern states of both France and America and their respective militaries actively are protecting World Jewry today from really getting that which World Jewry actually deserves!

The more I read about Jewish history, at least, the more I just keep coming back to the conclusion that nothing has really changed whatsoever in hundreds of years really. Back during French Revolutionary days, the Jews were every bit as much back then just seeking to confuse the various key issues of the day in order to mislead and ultimately subvert their host societies no differently really than Jews are doing today whether in America or France or wherever else. But there were obviously vast differences in the main type of political systems in place during both times. One had a Monarchy and one a Democracy. But the Jewish Problem still worked essentially the same way in order to undermine the State and the people in both cases- as well as every other respective case that we could ever document from the past or present as well most likely. The more I read and learn, the more I am being confirmed in this conclusion from my vantage point at least.

Anyway, I should be dropping some more good quotes on Jews and the New World Order here shortly if not tonight then later on tomorrow as soon as possible. I have a few more from this current book, and then I know at least one from another book I have on Jews and Germany during the early modern period.
 
Last edited:

Coltraine

America First
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
I've been wanting to get to this quote for a while now actually:

"In many towns the massacres, spreading from Frances across Switzerland to Germany, Austria, and Eastern Europe, were part of an uprising against the patriciate. The flagellant movement, whose adherents believed they could avert divine retribution by self-laceration and ecstatic public displays, whipped the crowd up into a frenzy and thus also played its role in the butchery of the plague years. In many localities it was not only Jews who were accused of polluting the wells: clergymen, the sick, noblemen, the crippled, aliens, and beggars were all suspected of foul play- in short, any who happened to be hated or under the blot of social stigma. However, the Jews, universally rejected by society, were singled out in particular as the evildoers responsible for the Black Death. Already in September 1348 Jews on the shores of Lake Geneva confessed under torture to having poisoned the wells. The tortured Jews stated that the aim of their conspiracy was to rule the world, that they had suffered long enough as servants, and now were going to be masters of the land under the reign of their Messiah."
The quote is just ripped straight out of the text of a normal Jew-written history book about Germany in the early modern era. The book is German-Jewish History in Modern Times: Volume 1: Tradition and Enlightenment (1996) by Mordechai Breuer and Michael Graetz (edited by Michael A. Meyer and translated from the original German by William Templer). It is from a very mainstream Jewish publishing house called the Leo Baeck Institute of Columbia University Press. So unlike a lot of the previous citations above, this is no book or quote that could ever be categorized as "conspiracy theory" or "conspiratorial" in either tone or text.

I chose this quote first of all because of its early reference (1348) to Jews admitting publicly (whether under torture or not) that the eventual belief in their entire religion of Judaism was/is to rule the world under their tribal messiah. And while I do want to address the torture question itself, I first want to hit some other parts of this entire quotation, because as I was transcribing it above numerous other thoughts and commentary came to my mind immediately upon seeing some of just what these Jew-authors themselves have attempted to pass off to the public as implied skepticism under the guise of historical accuracy and fact. And the fact is that many historians of the past (i.e. prior to the 20th and 21st Centuries) would not necessarily have totally agreed with many of the above characterizations. And I now kind of wish to dispose of some of these common Jew-fallacies involving Jewish history. So I'm going to try to take them in chronological order as they come along.

...the massacres.... were part of an uprising against the patriciate.
This is misleading in my opinion. Because I've read a lot of different books by various authors who describe the Black Death period throughout Europe, and what they all have in common mostly is that Jews were ubiquitous in their being blamed publicly, broadly for poisoning wells and thus causing the entire plague in the first place. Now, we can certainly have doubt or skepticism over that specific claim, of course, if we so choose to, but what we cannot do in my opinion is attempt as these Jew-authors do above and pawn the entire reaction against the Black Death upon the Jews as just a smaller part of a much bigger attack on "the patriciate" as a whole or upon any larger group of people whom the Jews allegedly just were one single component of historically. That is all wrong- of course. Because the Jews always were the direct and immediate target of Europeans universally in their reprisals against whoever they genuinely believed caused the plague. In other words, the attacks on Jews were not just some smaller aspect of some bigger attack on some imaginary larger group of people. The Jews were the object of these attacks, because they were all across Europe deemed at that time to be the cause of the plague (whether this was accurate or not in the scientific sense!).

The flagellant movement... whipped the crowd up into a frenzy
It's a shame that we have to do this every time we read Jew-written texts, but we do have to do it- of course. We have to very critically analyze every single small thing that they try to tell us in order to gauge whether or not it adheres to the generalized beliefs that we've already previously observed and encountered in other similar texts on the time period in question. And on this aspect, I just don't like how these authors present this above. It too much makes it seem like the Jews dindu nuffin, like they could not have done nuffin whatsoever, and like for anyone to today even question these assumptions whatsoever would make them themselves the objects of mockery and derision. The fact is that the flagellants didn't necessarily even have to "whip" anyone up in order to already hate the Jews and to suspect Jews of villainy of whatever kind or form. Jewish behavior and actions did that alone. And these were not just fanatical priests or superstitious peasants doing these interviews and conducting this investigation from a legal front, but these were trained European minds who understood these distinctions well indeed. They understood them all much, much more thoroughly than do our modern minds- as so thoroughly polluted by Jewish propaganda as they are today. So we do not need to have some non-Jewish source for our understanding of why specifically the Jews were blamed in this case. The Jews were blamed because that's what the evidence pointed to. And that's what the trained legal minds of the time believed. Universally they believed this!

In many localities it was not only Jews who were accused of polluting the wells: clergymen, the sick, noblemen, the crippled, aliens, and beggars were all suspected of foul play- in short, any who happened to be hated or under the blot of social stigma.
This is the same as immediately above almost. The authors are doing their ultimate best in order to cause us to think that it wasn't only the Jews or mainly the Jews who were accused of these kinds of conspiracies historically. And that simply runs counter-factual to the evidence and to all previous historical precedent! The fact is that yes, it actually was mainly the Jews who were universally blamed for these things- rightly or wrongly!

1348 Jews on the shores of Lake Geneva confessed under torture to having poisoned the wells.
Now, to the whole torture argument. I've come across this trope quite a lot in my readings of Jewish history. It is obviously one that Jew-authors and thinkers will rely on quite a lot. So the question I have, then, is if confessions extracted under torture were then so bad and so obviously "un-true", then why should we then believe their whole Holocaust narrative? Because that's where 99% of its original evidence derives from ultimately. From torture mainly. And it's the same exact trope that the Jews use when talking about the Inquisitorial Age as well in Europe. The argument from them goes basically that because some piece of info was originally extracted via torture that it ipso facto must then be unreliable and untrue. And that is a rhetorical game that Jews like to play with us goyim without ever even once considering the implications of this game upon their own more recent historical fantasy involving not only the whole Holocaust but many other Jewish tales about the past that have conveniently now been warped out of all recognition to their original foundations. So I just want to state this for the record obviously. The Jews admitted these things. They admitted them on many different occasions and all in contexts where the Jew in one town or city did not know what the Jew in the other town or city next door was also saying to the authorities. Yet these admissions- extracted under torture or not- were always conveniently the same!

The tortured Jews stated that the aim of their conspiracy was to rule the world, that they had suffered long enough as servants, and now were going to be masters of the land under the reign of their Messiah
In fact, this is actually the single part of that above quote that I take zero umbrage with personally. It is the only single straightforward thing that these Jew-authors have stated within the entire larger quote altogether in my opinion. Because this is their belief. It was their belief back then in the 14th Century, and it is their same belief today. So it seems to me maybe that the only single time we can ever really actually count on Jews to tell the truth and the whole truth whatsoever is maybe when Jews are currently undergoing torture, LoL.

Anyway, if anyone here sees anything else about the above quotation that is worth talking about, we should do it. Because whether it is this particular quote or another, or just something some Jew says today publicly to the gullible goyim, it is always these exact same kinds of misrepresentations and exaggerations that Jews will often employ whether in the literary field or in the realm of specifically History or just in the much more familiar environment of what we today just call the JewsMedia, or just from some Jew mischaracterizing some current event today on Twitter. It's always the same sorts of tricks that they have up their sleeve. And so these things are worth getting a little bit more familiar with in my opinion.
 
Last edited:
Top