Jews and the New World Order

[Coltraine]

I found an oldy but goody the other day while reading Paul Lawrence Rose's book German Question/Jewish Question: Revolutionary Antisemitism from Kant to Wagner (1990).

I had read this book many years ago- maybe it was even one of the very first I had ever read on Germany, the Jews, and the early modern period- but I had it opened back up again recently because I was looking into the Young Germany literary movement of which famous Jews like Heinrich Heine and Ludwig Borne were members of during the rough time period coinciding with the political revolutions happening all throughout Europe during the year 1848.

Anyway, right at the beginning of Chapter 1 in this book, which talks about the "Genealogy of Modern Antisemitism", giving a short history lesson, and going all the way back to the early days of Christianity itself, there is a quotation from the great St. John Chrysostom in regard to the Jews.

John Chrysostom - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Chrysostom really shouldn't even need to be articulated on here; most readers of this forum should generally know who he is, but in this book after telling about Tacitus's indictment of the Jews as "a nation driven by their hatred of the rest of humanity", the author Rose begins to tell of Chrysostom too. And after providing some small amount of the book's context, here's the quote in full:

...The writings of the church fathers, most notably St. John Chrysostom, expanded this charge into a repertoire of anti-Jewish cliches: the Jews are full of hatred for the rest of mankind and are the enemies of all gentiles; they are parasites on the gentile societies that harbor them; they are addicted to money, and through the power of money, they aspire to one day be rulers of the world even though they have, by their innate quarrelsomeness, lost their own state currently.

Well, what I want to know is: where is the freakin' lie?

I mean- yes these allegations all are "cliches", but just like our own modern "stereotypes", cliches too were originally brought about and became what they are/were originally because they carried with them more than a little bit of actual objective truth. But the author, the philo-Semitic Rose, of course, simply brushes these allegations by Chrysostom off as "a repertoire of anti-Jewish cliches"- because of hecking course!

The source that Rose uses to get that quote is J.C. Gager's book The Origins of Anti-Semitism: Attitudes Toward Judaism in Pagan and Christian Antiquity (1958).

It's always been amazing to me since I originally began delving into this JQ material and its history how these authors just like the one quoted directly above, Paul Lawrence Rose, can write these entire 400+ page books intending and declaring to teach people about the "history of anti-Semitism" as well as its reasons and its causes. Yet as soon as they get to the initial parts of the history (in our case Chrysostom) and his own reasoning (stated above in the quoted section), these authors without any investigation whatsoever and without even pausing for a split-second to consider the other side of the story simply brush off the allegation of the "anti-Semite" without even stating either way whether or not the allegation being made is either true or false. And like our modern-day SJWs and JewsMedia that we're all utterly too familiar with, these authors who went to school for this shit and who make it their business to study academically "anti-Semitism" offer no more than a fancy-sounding "Wow. Just. Wow." when it comes to them being face to face with the objective truth of any so-called anti-Semite's assertions!

But the fact remains, Chrysostom said these words in the 4th Century. And many people today like us state the same exact uncomfortable truths. Almost word-for-word too! But it simply never occurs to anybody but us ever that there just might be some sort of historical continuity there as far as truth goes. Nope. It's always just more elaborate versions of the now-too-typical "Wow. Just. Wow." which dodges the uncomfortable truth altogether. And people commonly allow these people to get away with it without even addressing the fact that anti-Semites today are saying the exact same things as anti-Semites centuries ago.

In fact, this reference above by Chrysostom could in fact be the earliest reference we have (at least on this particular thread) either by a Jew or a non-Jew alluding to the Jews' (by now) well-known desire and/or plan to rule the world through global governance centrally from Jerusalem.

 

[fide]

these authors without any investigation whatsoever and without even pausing for a split-second to consider the other side of the story simply brush off the allegation of the "anti-Semite" without even stating either way whether or not the allegation being made is either true or false.

Well, as The Chosen People, they view themselves as the Only people, so its only their view that matters to the selfish parasitic bastards. The dog to the Tick, is simply some food and a ride. The tick don't think or care about the dog. Not unless the dog starts workihg to get the tick off him, in which case the dog is wrong and a problem for the tick.

They tell this themselves in their cursed books, from their rabbis, all other people are merely beasts without souls. So in these books you mention, the authors just carrying through with the tribe's monomania.

What's that Polish proverb? They tell you what was done to them but never why.

 

[Garfisch]

I found an oldy but goody the other day while reading Paul Lawrence Rose's book German Question/Jewish Question: Revolutionary Antisemitism from Kant to Wagner (1990).

I had read this book many years ago- maybe it was even one of the very first I had ever read on Germany, the Jews, and the early modern period- but I had it opened back up again recently because I was looking into the Young Germany literary movement of which famous Jews like Heinrich Heine and Ludwig Borne were members of during the rough time period coinciding with the political revolutions happening all throughout Europe during the year 1848.

Anyway, right at the beginning of Chapter 1 in this book, which talks about the "Genealogy of Modern Antisemitism", giving a short history lesson, and going all the way back to the early days of Christianity itself, there is a quotation from the great St. John Chrysostom in regard to the Jews.

John Chrysostom - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Chrysostom really shouldn't even need to be articulated on here; most readers of this forum should generally know who he is, but in this book after telling about Tacitus's indictment of the Jews as "a nation driven by their hatred of the rest of humanity", the author Rose begins to tell of Chrysostom too. And after providing some small amount of the book's context, here's the quote in full:



Well, what I want to know is: where is the freakin' lie?

I mean- yes these allegations all are "cliches", but just like our own modern "stereotypes", cliches too were originally brought about and became what they are/were originally because they carried with them more than a little bit of actual objective truth. But the author, the philo-Semitic Rose, of course, simply brushes these allegations by Chrysostom off as "a repertoire of anti-Jewish cliches"- because of hecking course!

The source that Rose uses to get that quote is J.C. Gager's book The Origins of Anti-Semitism: Attitudes Toward Judaism in Pagan and Christian Antiquity (1958).

It's always been amazing to me since I originally began delving into this JQ material and its history how these authors just like the one quoted directly above, Paul Lawrence Rose, can write these entire 400+ page books intending and declaring to teach people about the "history of anti-Semitism" as well as its reasons and its causes. Yet as soon as they get to the initial parts of the history (in our case Chrysostom) and his own reasoning (stated above in the quoted section), these authors without any investigation whatsoever and without even pausing for a split-second to consider the other side of the story simply brush off the allegation of the "anti-Semite" without even stating either way whether or not the allegation being made is either true or false. And like our modern-day SJWs and JewsMedia that we're all utterly too familiar with, these authors who went to school for this shit and who make it their business to study academically "anti-Semitism" offer no more than a fancy-sounding "Wow. Just. Wow." when it comes to them being face to face with the objective truth of any so-called anti-Semite's assertions!

But the fact remains, Chrysostom said these words in the 4th Century. And many people today like us state the same exact uncomfortable truths. Almost word-for-word too! But it simply never occurs to anybody but us ever that there just might be some sort of historical continuity there as far as truth goes. Nope. It's always just more elaborate versions of the now-too-typical "Wow. Just. Wow." which dodges the uncomfortable truth altogether. And people commonly allow these people to get away with it without even addressing the fact that anti-Semites today are saying the exact same things as anti-Semites centuries ago.

In fact, this reference above by Chrysostom could in fact be the earliest reference we have (at least on this particular thread) either by a Jew or a non-Jew alluding to the Jews' (by now) well-known desire and/or plan to rule the world through global governance centrally from Jerusalem.

CHURCH FATHERS: Homily 48 on the Gospel of John (Chrysostom)

Featuring the Church Fathers, Catholic Encyclopedia, Summa Theologica and more.

www.newadvent.org

John 7:1-2
After these things Jesus walked in Galilee; for He would not walk in Jewry, because the Jews sought to kill Him. Now the Jews' feast of tabernacles was at hand.
1. Nothing is worse than envy and malice; through these death entered into the world. For when the devil saw man honored, he endured not his prosperity, but used every means to destroy him. Wisdom 2:24 And from the same root one may everywhere see this same fruit produced. Thus Abel was slain; thus David, with many other just men, was like to have been so; from this also the Jews became Christ-slayers.

Malice and Envy. The eternal essence of the jew. Origen and Justin Martyr had the same conclusions about them as Chrysostom. The Church Fathers are great at explaining the spiritual dimensions of anti-semitism, as well as the satanic nature of jews.

 

[Garfisch]

Adam Green just threw this up... blatant!

"We want Moshiach...to CONQUER the Goyim NOW!!!"

Know More News with Adam Green https://www.knowmorenews.org/ Support Know More News: https://www.knowmorenews.org/donate https://www.knowmorenews.org/store Patreon - https://www.patreon.com/AdamGreen Subscribe Star: https://www.subscribestar.c…

www.bitchute.com

 

[Creepy-ass Cracker]

https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/3711443/jewish/Is-Social-Activism-Destroying-American-Judaism.htm

“...In 1994, Yeshiva University held a symposium entitled “Tikkun Olam: Social Responsibility in Jewish Thought and Law.” The symposium turned out to be more than a delivery of academic papers. It was a soul-searching of halachic Judaism.

“The burning question: Does halachah render Judaism an insular religion, focused entirely on its own self-preservation, or does it also include a mandate for us to care for the world’s future? Where is our precedent in halachah for tikkun olam?

“Many of the speakers pointed out that Judaism, from its very origins, provides practical guidelines for society beyond the tribe. The Talmud lists seven laws prescribed in the book of Genesis that apply to all the descendants of Noah—i.e., all humanity.

“Like the bare-bones protocol that makes the Internet so robust, these laws provide universal fundamentals. If you were a stranger under the ancient Jewish state and accepted these laws, you were considered a ger toshav (resident alien)—making you eligible for all forms of communal welfare.

“These are not laws meant to make everyone Jewish, or to create any form of religion at all. They simply say that there’s a Creator, that He would like His creatures to act responsibly and get along, and here are the rules. They are a basis, in other words, for a harmonious diversity of humankind.

“The concept is historically significant. In the Roman era, those who abandoned idolatry and accepted these fundamental laws proliferated throughout the empire.

“In the 17th century, when England and the Netherlands realized they needed some form of international law to avoid conflict, Hugo Grotius and John Selden laid its foundations. Both considered the institution of the resident alien, as described in the Hebrew Bible and Talmud, a precedent for religious tolerance and universal law.7

“Nevertheless, at this symposium, speaker after speaker questioned whether delivering this universal message was truly our obligation, or just a nice thing to do. Yes, Maimonides writes in his legal code that we were commanded to do so. But perhaps that’s an obligation only of a king, or a supreme court. And who says other authorities agree with Maimonides? After all, the paucity of discussion on the topic since the Talmud is undeniable.

“Michael Broyde cited a responsum of the Rebbe, and contributed the following comment: 8
Rabbi Schneerson’s view is unique in that he not only assumes that Maimonides is correct in ruling that there is a general obligation to compel gentiles to observe Noachide law, but he also assumes that the obligation to compel observance includes within it the obligation to persuade. Rabbi Schneerson thus extends to the obligation to cover a much greater area than any other rabbinical authority, both in terms of the responsibility to do so and in the means by which to do so. 9
Broyde was not alone. “Rabbi Schneerson gave the amorphous concept of participating as role models in the general society even sharper halakhic definition.”Jack Bieler pointed out that “Rabbi Schneerson gave the amorphous concept of participating as role models in the general society even sharper halakhic definition.”

“The Rebbe’s argument does not rest on Maimonides alone. The Rebbe asked, “How does Maimonides know this? Where does he get it from?”

“His answer is that Maimonides asks a simple question: The Torah was given exclusively to the Jews. If so, why does it discuss how the rest of the world should behave? It could only be that we have responsibility to influence the rest of the world, by whatever means available, to keep these foundational laws.

Now Is the Time
As to the reticence of so many halachic authorities on the subject, the explanation is obvious: Since the rise of Christianity and Islam, any Jewish interference in the realm of beliefs and teachings would have placed whole Jewish communities in grave danger. So, with rare exceptions, we had to keep our mouths shut. Until now.

We live now in a time when the world wants to hear what Judaism has to say. An era when the greatest contribution you can make to society is to sit down to dinner with your family every Friday night.

We live now in a time where nothing can be left behind. If you can find any way to use something for the good, don’t leave it lying in the mud. If you can’t find the good within it, struggle to look deeper.

We live in a time when all the promises of the prophets and sages suddenly appear plausible even through natural means alone—a time void of suffering and illness, a time of peace and harmony.

But it is left up to us to make it happen. The main thing, as the Rebbe so often repeated, is “just do something.”

—quoted from the article Is Social Activism Destroying American Judaism? Tikkun Olam, For Real

 

[Coltraine]

All people who think they're Jew-wise should be familiar with this which is surprisingly still on youtube...

It's not on YouTube anymore though, friend.

You jinxed it obviously.

 

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/3711443/jewish/Is-Social-Activism-Destroying-American-Judaism.htm

“...In 1994, Yeshiva University held a symposium entitled “Tikkun Olam: Social Responsibility in Jewish Thought and Law.” The symposium turned out to be more than a delivery of academic papers. It was a soul-searching of halachic Judaism.

“The burning question: Does halachah render Judaism an insular religion, focused entirely on its own self-preservation, or does it also include a mandate for us to care for the world’s future? Where is our precedent in halachah for tikkun olam?

“Many of the speakers pointed out that Judaism, from its very origins, provides practical guidelines for society beyond the tribe. The Talmud lists seven laws prescribed in the book of Genesis that apply to all the descendants of Noah—i.e., all humanity.

“Like the bare-bones protocol that makes the Internet so robust, these laws provide universal fundamentals. If you were a stranger under the ancient Jewish state and accepted these laws, you were considered a ger toshav (resident alien)—making you eligible for all forms of communal welfare.

“These are not laws meant to make everyone Jewish, or to create any form of religion at all. They simply say that there’s a Creator, that He would like His creatures to act responsibly and get along, and here are the rules. They are a basis, in other words, for a harmonious diversity of humankind.

“The concept is historically significant. In the Roman era, those who abandoned idolatry and accepted these fundamental laws proliferated throughout the empire.

“In the 17th century, when England and the Netherlands realized they needed some form of international law to avoid conflict, Hugo Grotius and John Selden laid its foundations. Both considered the institution of the resident alien, as described in the Hebrew Bible and Talmud, a precedent for religious tolerance and universal law.7

“Nevertheless, at this symposium, speaker after speaker questioned whether delivering this universal message was truly our obligation, or just a nice thing to do. Yes, Maimonides writes in his legal code that we were commanded to do so. But perhaps that’s an obligation only of a king, or a supreme court. And who says other authorities agree with Maimonides? After all, the paucity of discussion on the topic since the Talmud is undeniable.

“Michael Broyde cited a responsum of the Rebbe, and contributed the following comment: 8

Broyde was not alone. “Rabbi Schneerson gave the amorphous concept of participating as role models in the general society even sharper halakhic definition.”Jack Bieler pointed out that “Rabbi Schneerson gave the amorphous concept of participating as role models in the general society even sharper halakhic definition.”

“The Rebbe’s argument does not rest on Maimonides alone. The Rebbe asked, “How does Maimonides know this? Where does he get it from?”

“His answer is that Maimonides asks a simple question: The Torah was given exclusively to the Jews. If so, why does it discuss how the rest of the world should behave? It could only be that we have responsibility to influence the rest of the world, by whatever means available, to keep these foundational laws.

Now Is the Time
As to the reticence of so many halachic authorities on the subject, the explanation is obvious: Since the rise of Christianity and Islam, any Jewish interference in the realm of beliefs and teachings would have placed whole Jewish communities in grave danger. So, with rare exceptions, we had to keep our mouths shut. Until now.

We live now in a time when the world wants to hear what Judaism has to say. An era when the greatest contribution you can make to society is to sit down to dinner with your family every Friday night.

We live now in a time where nothing can be left behind. If you can find any way to use something for the good, don’t leave it lying in the mud. If you can’t find the good within it, struggle to look deeper.

We live in a time when all the promises of the prophets and sages suddenly appear plausible even through natural means alone—a time void of suffering and illness, a time of peace and harmony.

But it is left up to us to make it happen. The main thing, as the Rebbe so often repeated, is “just do something.”

—quoted from the article Is Social Activism Destroying American Judaism? Tikkun Olam, For Real

Thanks for this...I think the real eternal question is whether Jews can be saved in a belief in Jesus Christ our Lord? They are not people of real spirit -- just words and legalistic texts (Babylon-with the full Earthly pursuits in the Talmud). Can they ever recognize Jesus Christ? Can they lose Judaism at some point and the Rabbi's anti-Goyim screeds?

 

[Creepy-ass Cracker]

Thanks for this...I think the real eternal question is whether Jews can be saved in a belief in Jesus Christ our Lord? They are not people of real spirit -- just words and legalistic texts (Babylon-with the full Earthly pursuits in the Talmud). Can they ever recognize Jesus Christ? Can they lose Judaism at some point?

Yes they can, and many will shortly before the end of the world....An excellent book on this topic is The Kingship of Christ and the Conversion of the Jewish Nation by Rev. Denis Fahey.

The Kingship of Christ and the Conversion of the Jewish Nation: Fr. Denis Fahey C.S.Sp.: 9781622921157: Amazon.com: Books

The Kingship of Christ and the Conversion of the Jewish Nation [Fr. Denis Fahey C.S.Sp.] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. The Kingship of Christ and the Conversion of the Jewish Nation

www.amazon.com

 

[Coltraine]

It's not on YouTube anymore though, friend.

You jinxed it obviously.

Here's Benjamin Freedman's speech again btw:

Freedman's Wikipedia page is also worth reading if only for the fact that you can tell the editors are inserting all sorts of unnecessary factoids into his biography that are not really central to his story at all only to better paint Freedman with the brushes of "holocaust denial" and "pro-Arab" and things like that. There's also a few sources I had never realized or read at the end of the page.

Benjamin H. Freedman - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

And a few decent pictures like this one below:


Which demonstrates that not only was Freedman highly outspoken about Zionism in his life, but he was on the right side of the Communist debate too- understanding that both Communism and Zionism at that time were two prongs of the larger Jew World Order agenda. And he had long converted to Christianity on top of it all. So, basically, a true, honest, good Jew if there ever was one indeed!

I'd like to see someone write a thorough biography of Freedman's life someday myself. I would definitely read it.

@TimeBandit

 

[Coltraine]

I found another good quote in the same book I used above for the St. John Chrysostom quote (Paul Lawrence Rose, German Question/Jewish Question: Revolutionary Antisemitism from Kant to Wagner, 1990).

This one is by none other than Mr. Martin Luther himself. This was originally written after Luther had changed his mind on the Jews and decided once and for all that "any hope for Jewish redemption was rendered vain by the irremediable evil of the Jewish national character" (Rose's quote- not Luther's) and that consequently "the only solution was to take practical measures of German self-defense against the Jews". This included among many other measures an official European-wide forced expulsion of the Jews to Jerusalem, but Luther even warned that if the Jews failed to self-expel that they would have to be murdered- and he considered this a righteous act even within the context of Christianity. Luther talked about actively burning down synagogues and pogroming the Jews in order to "remove the safe-conduct" that was currently granted to Jewry in that time by various German Princes not to mention the Holy Roman Emperor himself.

In other famous passages Luther almost predicts Karl Marx's 19th Century critique of Jewish Power when he says, paraphrasing, that Germany's ultimate redemption from spiritual as well as material misery meant her redemption from the Jews and Judaism. Because that specific aspect (i.e. the JQ) of normal German life at the time dominated and overrode all others absolutely. So in 1543 in his famous writing Against the Jews and Their Lies, which readers of this forum should probably be familiar with indeed, Luther said that the Jews were "bloodthirsty murderers not only of Jesus and of Christianity but of the entire German people" specifically, who are "held captive in their own country, tortured, and robbed daily" by the Jews.

So I wonder now: does any of these observations made by Luther above sound anything similar to what is happening today too right here in America (or Europe)?

[rhetorical obviously]

Luther goes on:

...the Jews are lords of the world and all the gentiles flock to them... giving the noble princes and lords of Israel all they have, while the Jews curse, spit on and malign the Germans... They say that God is to kill and exterminate all of us Germans through their messiah, so that they can lay their hands on the land, the goods and the governments of the whole world... They let us work with the sweat of our brow... while they stuff themselves, guzzle and live in luxury from our hard-earned goods. With their accursed usury they hold us and our property captive... They are our masters and we their servants...

We are at fault in not avenging all this innocent blood of our Lord and Churches and... the blood of the children which they have shed since then, and which still shines forth from their Jewish eyes and skin. We are at fault in not slaying them.

Aside from all of these truths, Luther after this begins to spell out specifically the practical and political measures which are to be taken in the future if in fact the Germans of that time period were to ever truly throw off the all-consuming Jewish domination that surrounded them then even at that early date in the mid-16th Century.

This is something I always tell JQ-aware people that I talk to myself: the Jews have been dominating different parts of the Western world going back far further in time than many JQ-aware Americans today realize. Many Americans currently only realize that Jews took over in the 20th Century, or maybe they will go back even as far as the Civil War, and there's some varying degree of truth to either claims in my thinking at least in the specific context of America only. Jews did certainly increase their overall power in America during that time period, and they've been increasing their power all the way up until today's time too. But elsewhere around the world- and specifically at various countries and cities throughout Europe- Jews have now dominated us for a very long time indeed. I always use Spain as one of the earliest examples of total Jewish domination, but I could just as easily use either Medieval Poland or Hungary or different parts of France or Germany too going all the way back to the 12th and 13th Centuries in some cases.

 

[fide]

This was originally written after Luther had changed his mind on the Jews and decided once and for all that "any hope for Jewish redemption was rendered vain by the irremediable evil of the Jewish national character" (Rose's quote- not Luther's) and that consequently "the only solution was to take practical measures of German self-defense against the Jews. This included among many other measures an official European-wide forced expulsion of the Jews to Jerusalem, but Luther even warned that if the Jews failed to self-expel that they would have to be murdered- and he considered this a righteous act even within the context of Christianity. Luther talked about actively burning down synagogues and pogroming the Jews in order to "remove the safe-conduct" that was currently granted to Jewry in that time by various German Princes not to mention the Holy Roman Emperor himself.

I LOVE MARTIN LUTHER!!!!

just think if our forefathers had gotten rid of these rats when they should have!

 

[Postuma]

All people who think they're Jew-wise should be familiar with this which is surprisingly still on youtube...

It has since been deleted, which one was it?

 

[Coltraine]

Lots of interesting takes in this video--

Norman Roth is one of the most interesting and well-read Jewish historians I've ever came across, and I've read several of his books whether on the Normans or on Spain or Portugal all in relation to their respective connections to Jewry at the time. His book on the Normans and Jewry is probably the single best in existence on the subject. I could probably spend a lot of time and words right now talking about some of the things in that book which is close to 1,000+ pages in length.

But the main thing I wanted to share in regard to Norman Roth is this paper I recently came across on Academia.edu, which is a useful website if you're someone like me who enjoys reading various PhD. dissertations and academic papers from scholars around the world. A lot of the times on this website you can find papers written by authors you know and are well aware of, but the papers will be on subject matter not included in their various hard-print books over the years. And this is the situation with the paper below that I will link now by Roth:

Norman Roth, “Anti-Converso Riots of the Fifteenth Century, Pulgar, and the Inquisition,” En la España Medieval 15 (1992): 367-394

Norman Roth, “Anti-Converso Riots of the Fifteenth Century, Pulgar, and the Inquisition,” En la España Medieval 15 (1992): 367-394

www.academia.edu

Although Roth does have an entire other book about the Converso and Jew issue in Spain, the important thing about this paper is how it really documents in great detail the intermarrying between the Sephardic elite of Jewry and the Nobility (and even Monarchy) of both Spain and Portugal during the Medieval era. And then you have to realize that after this initial intermarrying with Jewry, those same Nobles many times went on to intermarry with other Monarchial and Noble houses throughout all of Europe too. That is not the main subject of the paper, itself, but all the important details are in there if you read along carefully.

As an example of what is to be found in the link:

Isabella and Ferdinand expelled the Jews from Spain and made the Inquisition into a powerful institution whose main victims were Catholics of Jewish or Moorish ancestry who were accused of practicing their old faith in secret. However, like a part of Iberians in general and most of Iberian nobility, even Isabella had some Jewish ancestry: three of her great-great-grandparents had Iberian (Sephardic) Jewish roots. The founder of Trastamara dynasty Henry II of Castile was a son of Castilian King Alfonso XI and his mistress of Jewish converso origin Eleanor of Guzman; his grandson Henry III of Castile married Katherine of Lancaster whose mother was a daughter of Castilian King Pedro the Cruel and his Jewish converso mistress/wife Maria de Padilla: Ines Pirez, a mistress of John I of Portugal and mother of Afonso, 1st Duke of Braganza was a Jewish converso; finally all royal families of Iberia and consequently, most of European royalty descended by female lines from the first Navarrese dynasty which was in part of Iberian Jewish descent, and that includes Isabella's Castilian ancestors Alfonso XI and Pedro the Cruel, John I of Portugal, John of Gaunt, Eleanor of Aragon. etc.

The same is basically true of Ferdinand the Catholic's ancestry and its own intermarrying with Jewish Conversos, and you can find that in the link.

Why did this happen?

Well, many royal dynasties, including the House of Trastámara (Queen Isabella's dynasty), do in fact contain racially "Jewish" members. Because many times the royalty or nobility most desperately needed money, it was a common practice in Medieval Europe to sell sons (although not heir claimants e.g. crown prince), otherwise known as a dowry, to a rich merchant's daughter. A lot of these merchants were Jewish, and given the Vatican's ban on lending at usury for Christians, it also meant many bankers and moneylenders were Jewish as well. The concept of a dowry did two things. It created alliances between the royalty/nobility and the successful trading class. It also led to the ennoblement, particularly in France and Spain, of many merchants, moneylenders, and bankers. Later on this same process happened in England and elsewhere.

Lastly, which I also think is very important when confronting this issue head-on, today's Jews love to suggest that any famous person is part Jewish. This is a sickness of insecurity which they have- a real pathology. Speaking within this time frame, especially in Medieval Spain and elsewhere in the Iberian context, Jews have also suggested that Christopher Columbus was part or full Jewish (which has been debunked as far as I can tell btw). Hell, they have even suggested that Hitler was a part-Jew (also long debunked). Jews love to confuse the issue. If they can confuse the issue, they can confuse you and so frame the whole argument. Jews are nothing in the scheme of things in reality. Put another way, Jews are legends in their own minds. So let's keep it confined there if we can.

But I do still think it important to recognize how Jews corrupted especially our leaders in the past. And intermarrying our elite in exchange for their money was one of the major ways Jews accomplished this. It's still one of the major vectors taken today by Jews. Look at some of the most powerful families today in American politics whether the Trump family or the Biden or Bush or Clinton families. Jews are to be found in almost all of them. So Jews are still today doing this, therefore corrupting and co-opting our own non-Jewish leadership, and up until today there has really been nothing we can even do to successfully stop them.

 

[Coltraine]

For the moment, I'll just ignore the alien stuff and concentrate on this rabbi's pronouncement that Jews "have a mission to conquer the world", which they quite obviously do- as this whole entire thread has clearly born out for us.

Thanks for putting this on my radar @Justus via @nicadori originally.

The above is Rabbi Laitman, who apparently doesn't yet have his own Wikipedia page, but his main sect of Bnei Baruch (also known as Kabbalah Laam) does. Laitman is the founder of this sect, which is Kaballistic in nature.

Bnei Baruch - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

I was just reading the comments under that YouTube video above posted by Adam Green, and there's one at the very bottom from this normie Jew who is explaining to the gullible goyim about how this Laitman is not associated with mainstream or orthodox Jewry at all. But this is common bullshit. We know that Kaballah is very much central to all of Judaism- in fact. It is not as if orthodox Jewry "rejects" Kaballah. For they don't- whatsoever. So what this rabbi believes and promotes is more or less the same as any Jewish leader or lay Jew just like this kike commenting on the video believes and promotes. They're just trained in subterfuge- that's all. It is literally proposed to put a non-Jew to death if a Jew is to tell him anything at all from either the Talmud or the Kaballah. So in that case why would any Jew choose to confirm either way whether a traitorous Jew like Laitman (from their perspective- of course) was telling the truth either? (rhetorical)

Some of Bnei Baruch's history here:



Good stuff indeed!

"altruistic communism"

@fide I bet you'll get a real kick in the ass out of that! I know I did when I first encountered it.

Also interesting is the typical Jewish infighting and back-biting:



I also notice that on Amazon this kike's books are always being promoted too. He's got a lot of books out where the titles are like "Restore Your Life In 3 Easy Steps" and "Become Happy, Rich, and Prosperous Now", and he's basically just using the whole "tikkun olam" agenda both to make money and take money from the non-Jewish world who is gullible enough to take serious this generalized spiritual trash that he's selling them as well as indoctrinate young generations into the practice and ritual of Jew worship- both jobs that from where I'm sitting seem to be going pretty well for the rabbi in today's clusterfuck'd world.

 

[NE-Goy-RI]

 

[NE-Goy-RI]

Torah, Talmud, Kabballah, Zohar, they love all their books.

 

[nicadori]

View attachment 39598

The funny thing it is that at some point in that video he admitted that the planet he`s talking about, it is not really a planet but more like some sort of another realm.

 

[Freedom Monk]

For the moment, I'll just ignore the alien stuff and concentrate on this rabbi's pronouncement that Jews "have a mission to conquer the world", which they quite obviously do

Nice find @Coltraine. I saved myself a copy of this video just in case higher up jews decide to shut this member of their tribe up for exposing them too much than they like too.

This kike sounds absolutely beyond insane. I am still amazed when seeing stuff like this so out in the open and witnessing the absolute tenacity of their bullshit. I wonder how this juden reconciles the belief that he is an unearthly alien and yet also one of god's chosen who their god labels as the only humans?

This just makes me more steadfast in my belief that we have to stop the jews nwo plan at all costs. This kike better be careful with him throwing away his humanity like he is doing here, or else we will have to treat him like he isn't human... I mean, he did say he wasn't human after all.

 

[Coltraine]

Nice find @Coltraine. I saved myself a copy of this video just in case higher up jews decide to shut this member of their tribe up for exposing them too much than they like too.

This kike sounds absolutely beyond insane. I am still amazed when seeing stuff like this so out in the open and witnessing the absolute tenacity of their bullshit. I wonder how this juden reconciles the belief that he is an unearthly alien and yet also one of god's chosen who their god labels as the only humans?

This just makes me more steadfast in my belief that we have to stop the jews nwo plan at all costs. This kike better be careful with him throwing away his humanity like he is doing here, or else we will have to treat him like he isn't human... I mean, he did say he wasn't human after all.

It could actually be that the Elite Jews want this rabbi out there saying all the same kinds of things that all Jews in-the-know say and write and discuss among themselves as they've done now for centuries too, but that they want him saying these things with the whole alien talking point attached to all of it so as to discredit any potential "anti-Semite" or "conspiracy theorist" in the future who dares to expose much more orthodox Jewish writings from their own religious texts as well as just standard beliefs which are believed widely among all of their people.

The alien attachment to his rhetoric could be serving as some sort of predictive programming thing whereby in the future some anti-Semite like ourselves brings up some of the damning quotes which are in this very thread, and then the rebuttal of the Jew himself to the gullible goy audience will be something like: "how are you going to even believe this crazy Jew in the first place? He thinks aliens are real. He thinks he is an alien. He thinks Jews are aliens from another planet entirely. Only a complete moron would even believe a crazy guy like this- Jew or not!"

And Jews have been known to do stuff like that before. They are so paranoid and neurotic that I certainly wouldn't put anything passed them in terms of pre-emptively developing some sort of plan to combat the public exposure of their real internal plans before it ever actually even gets that far indeed.

 

[NoNogNoGoZone]

The funny thing it is that at some point in that video he admitted that the planet he`s talking about, it is not really a planet but more like some sort of another realm.

Related:

Researchers At CERN Making Contact With Parallel Universes

https://www.sciencenatures.com/2020/10/researchers-at-large-hadron-collider.html?m=1 the astoundingly complex LHC “atom smasher” at the CERN center in Geneva, Switzerland, are fired up to its maximum energy levels ever in an endeavor to identify - or perhaps generate - tiny black holes. If...

gameruprising.to

 

[fide]

I was just reading the comments under that YouTube video above posted by Adam Green, and there's one at the very bottom from this normie Jew who is explaining to the gullible goyim about how this Laitman is not associated with mainstream or orthodox Jewry at all. But this is common bullshit. We know that Kaballah is very much central to all of Judaism- in fact. It is not as if orthodox Jewry "rejects" Kaballah. For they don't- whatsoever. So what this rabbi believes and promotes is more or less the same as any Jewish leader or lay Jew just like this kike commenting on the video believes and promotes. They're just trained in subterfuge- that's all. It is literally proposed to put a non-Jew to death if a Jew is to tell him anything at all from either the Talmud or the Kaballah. So in that case why would any Jew choose to confirm either way whether a traitorous Jew like Laitman (from their perspective- of course) was telling the truth either? (rhetorical)

You know, dont forget a couple of things

1) All jews are not that smart. Even if we think overinflated mean iq number as 110, remember 110 itself is not that high, and "mean" means full half are at or below 110. No rocket scientists. Further, male / female iq differs significantly, in that females cluster tightly around the mean. If half kikes are female, then it's fair to estimate 3/4, most females, half males, as being near or below 110..and as i said i think that mean is inflated jew propaganda. We could further reduce by considering the number of sephardic kikes, who themselves score lower than Ashkenazi.

We do ourselves no help thinking of most of them as actually bright or especially conscious.

I write that because in above you mention jewtuber commenting that laitman's altruistic communistic kabbalistic jew aliens isnt normal jewry. My point is, while subterfuge is indeed in their blood, that does not necessarily mean that kike is lying, so far as he consciously understands..going back to first point, they are not all that smart. Further, i think half of jews at least are technically atheist functionally..They're no more studied in the fine points of whatever part of judaism than most catholics know much christian theology.

Could the jewtube commenter be doing actual subterfuge.. of course there is the chance.. but I think the greater likelihood is that you know more about jewry than they do, and he believed what he's saying.

The great problem of the jew is less the criminal genius mind (though there wre a significant number of those), but the corrupt heart, spirit, which I say is in their blood, the dna, which operates unconsciously, subconsciously. They are havens for demons in the flesh. High or low, learned in their black magic or not, the chief corrupting influence is that they see themselves each and collectively, as God, they worship themselves.

It is THIS that I think they all master, no actual study of kabala or anything else needed.

As for lying, they all lie all the time because they have no ethics and black corrupted souls..I actually believe they lie to themselves almost as much as to us. (They're super high in neurosis and mental illness. )

I just think we give the great mass of them w way too much credit when we imagine such jews as the commenter as actively ..Active wrong term, consciously plotting. He probably doesn't know that the root of his own demonic but less obviously so jewness is the same as the jew alien rabbi. Just by being a jew he no doubt actively plots every minute, but without consciousness, to them it's breathing air, instinctive..they are liars in their bones..and inversions, while thinking they are gods, they also know they are the damned incarnate, they both love and despise themselves.. the neurosis.

As for alien rabbi
How more jew can something be than to come up with "altruistic communism"? Dry wetness. Their word games are endless.

 

[Doomgoy]

Are there not two factions in this game?

Zionists and then the NWO?

Or do Zionists use the NWO to hide the World Jewish Congress?


"It's all so tiresome..."

 

[Coltraine]

You know, dont forget a couple of things

[...]

As for alien rabbi
How more jew can something be than to come up with "altruistic communism"? Dry wetness. Their word games are endless.

I wasn't suggesting that the commenter himself was "bullshitting" consciously. My main motivation in writing that paragraph was to attack the very idea that the commenter was putting forth about so and so rabbi or Jew being "cut-off" from mainstream Judaism strictly because of his use (or misuse) of the Kaballah.

Because that is bullshit- of course.

The particular subterfuge that I'm talking about, here, is not necessarily that of that commenter him or herself, but of the generalized kind that exists all throughout Judaism which is built right into the Talmud structurally. It is this subterfuge itself that wants to make all these needless distinctions and digressions when in general it is not really even necessary to do so in the first place- especially not to explain to a lay audience (which would be the type existing on YouTube). That's what "pilpul" is all about: confusing your audience through needless distinctions without any real difference whatsoever. And that serves effectively to confuse the goyim itself because the goyim get lost in all the misplaced terminology and redundancy.



So yes, I'm right where you're at in terms of the commenter probably not really knowing consciously that he is spouting "bullshit", as I dubbed it originally.

And I definitely could have made that point more clear in my original comment- so thanks for the opportunity to clarify.

But nonetheless it still is bullshit anyway for the normal structural, intentionally obtuse, Talmudic reasons.

 

[Coltraine]

Israel is sound and is called upon to take its place in leading the world's values. This is the outline that G-d promised Abraham. Op-ed:

Rabbi Shmuel Eliyahu: America is collapsing, Israel must fill the vacuum

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/294610 התחבר MainBriefsOpEdsJudaismInside IsraelDefense/SecurityMiddle EastJewish WorldUS & CanadaEuropeFoodעבריתadvertise MainAll NewsOpedsRabbi Shmuel Eliyahu: America is collapsing, Israel must fill the vacuum Israel is sound and is...

gameruprising.to

Rabbi Shmuel Eliyahu: America is collapsing, Israel must fill the vacuum

www.israelnationalnews.com

(I will grab the best quotes from here later; this is just trying to get the example recorded while I have the opportunity)

Thanks @Panzerhund for original article.

 

[Caligula]

I recall the Duke talking about this many years ago. Basically citing Israeli Rabbinical leaders, political leaders etc. they all want a NWO with HQ at Jerusalem. Good luck to them. Even if they pull it off it’s very hard to escape 1 country.