so the vax knocks out a receptor that blocks a cancer trigger, ivermectin is allegedly a killer of some sorts of "virus" that can trigger cancer growth?
polio vax is a generational toxin, you may only gets its hard effects third or forth generation, after your immune system is sufficiently compromised?
the new injections are creating immune compromised at mass scale? setting stage for further erosion of the populations ability to fight off environmental toxins....
seems diabolical until you factor in the club of romes/Kissinger/rockefeller et al: idea of must have mass depop...
the die off can'ty be sudden or hard its got to be couched into these plandemics of "natural causes" man these folks are demons spawn!
gird ya loins, put on the full 7 pieces of armour!
snip
Dr. Blaylock: Well you know the interesting thing is, is this obsession and fallacy of those saying saying, “We got to get to those five year old kids, those 10 and 9 year old kids.” Virtually everyone, even the ones who say “well, we agree with the vaccination” for the “at risk”, agree its the worst idea you could ever have for children, it’s universal. Anyone not connected to making lots of money off this thing will tell you its the worst idea you could ever have. These children are not at risk. They do not transmit the virus and so there is absolutely no reason, no reason to say there should be vaccinated. Even if you believe the other hype.
There’s not a single expert in virology, epidemiology, infectious disease, or pediatrics that would dare say, “that’s a good idea.” No, it’s going to kill these kids, the ones that don’t die immediately are going to have their lives ruined forever. We’re going to see further explosion of cancer among these kids. And brain cancer, primary malignancies of the brain are the number one cancer in children. And what people don’t understand, the polio vaccine has probably played a huge role in that. Because it is transmitted vertically that means it goes from parents to children, to grandchildren. It passes down the line that fires its carcinogenic contaminated SV40 virus that was in the polio vaccine, is being transmitted vertically to each generation. And there are generations that are at risk. Now we have hundreds of millions of people that are going to turn their highly vulnerable cells that can no longer resist of the carcinogenicity of those SV40 viruses, because you’ve knocked out your p53 p21 for suicide genes and you’ve knocked out your DNA repair genes.
So just from the other observation, we have hundreds of oncogenic viruses circulating. Large percentage of population in America, about thirty percent have cytomegaly virus. A single protein produced by cytomegaly virus can produced cancer. So most people have carcinogenic viruses already in their body. But they’re kept at bay by your immune system. This vaccine has been shown to erode your immune ability against these viruses and now we see that you can’t protect yourself against carcinogenicity of these viruses, so you are producing the worst scenario starting a little child 5 6 7 8 years old, their life is doomed. You can’t take the viruses out of it. You can’t unvaccinated people. And parents need to understand that. Resist it with everything you can resist. I would never vaccinate one of these children with these dangerous vaccines.
Dr. Tenpenny: You know it’s interesting that you should say that about the oncogenic viruses because I remember back in the 60s and 70s there was a lot of discussion about viruses being the cause of cancer. There was a lot of research into that and then it just sort of went by the wayside.
And now we’re getting reported anecdotal cases of people who are taking Ivermectin either prophylactically or they’re taking it because they’ve been sick and their tumors are going away. One of them that I read just the other day in brief was actually about a glioblastoma. And I said, “well it doesn’t surprise me because Ivermectin has been shown by 23 different mechanisms of action that it can inhibit replication of any RNA type of virus.” You know, and for the listener there are lots of different types of viruses. One is at DNA virus and RNA viruses. There are other subsets of that. But those are the primary ones. And if Ivermectin can inhibit RNA viruses and that RNA viruses, it would appear that Ivermectin can also treat, or be an adjuvant of treatment for cancers or maybe even prevention of precancers. Dr. Blaylock, why would the powers-that-be, the FDA, the government, and all of the stupid ignorant Physicians who say bad things about Ivermectin because they don’t bother to read one single paper, why they want to pull it off the market because it’s just way too beneficial. Have you been reading some, some of these anecdotal reports and papers similarly?
Massimaux @masimaux
