I Stand with the Queen

Vilis_Hฤzners

For Race. For Nation. For Christ.
Old World Underground
๐Ÿ‘‘
๐Ÿธ Citizen of the Internet ๐Ÿธ
๐ŸŽฉ
โฐโ˜•๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฝ๐Ÿšฟ๐Ÿช’๐Ÿ‹๐Ÿป๐Ÿฅ“๐Ÿ’ปโ›ช๏ธ๐Ÿ– ๐Ÿ’ป
Something to consider.


 

Angryguy

Same angryguy new look
Old World Underground
๐Ÿ‘‘
๐Ÿธ Citizen of the Internet ๐Ÿธ
๐ŸŽฉ
โฐโ˜•๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฝ๐Ÿšฟ๐Ÿช’๐Ÿ‹๐Ÿป๐Ÿฅ“๐Ÿ’ปโ›ช๏ธ๐Ÿ–
The only person who has mentioned the word "jew"in this context is you. WTF are you even talking about?

I'm asking you or anyone to tell me where William, as war chief, came from and how he assembled the resources to do what he did. The history, as far as I can tell, is extremely murky on this subject. Suspiciously so. Considering the course of the 1,000 years following 1066, aren't you a little curious though?
Actually it was the pope. Just 12 years after the great schism of 1054 between east and west. There were two Norman conquests one in Southern Italy and Sicily and a second front in England. The pope blessed these attacks against Christians. The first one is obvious but not the English conquest. When the schism happened I am not sure where the church of england stood but it wasn't completely subservient to Rome that changed after the conquest. After england fell. A group of Anglo Saxons sailed to Constantinople and joined the varangian guard. From that time onwards the guard dominated by Anglo Saxons. They would still wage war against the Norman's but under a different banner. Interesting enough and very timely to today's topics. One group sailed from Constantinople to find a new colony named New England. In what is today the Crimea.
 
Last edited:

LittleGuinea

Well-known member
๐Ÿธ Citizen of the Internet ๐Ÿธ
โฐโ˜•๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฝ๐Ÿšฟ๐Ÿช’๐Ÿ‹๐Ÿป๐Ÿฅ“
Other than Donald Trump, King Charles is the closest thing we have to a leader of the Anglo Saxon race. Despite their flaws, I can't help but feel a natural affinity to both of them. Even though we rebelled against the monarchy, it's obvious many White Americans still view the Royal Family as a leader of our people. This is a good and healthy thing and I support it.
I agree, having a king is useful. Not sure why women are being allowed to usurp this man's job too.
 

Sandwhich Maiden

Well-known member
Old World Underground
๐Ÿธ Citizen of the Internet ๐Ÿธ
โฐโ˜•๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฝ
I agree, having a king is useful. Not sure why women are being allowed to usurp this man's job too.
In this instance, it is because Edward abdicated and had no heirs. His brother became King George VI and refused to try for a male heir although he was seemingly happily married. His eldest daughter, Elizabeth, then became Queen at his death.
 

LittleGuinea

Well-known member
๐Ÿธ Citizen of the Internet ๐Ÿธ
โฐโ˜•๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฝ๐Ÿšฟ๐Ÿช’๐Ÿ‹๐Ÿป๐Ÿฅ“
In this instance, it is because Edward abdicated and had no heirs. His brother became King George VI and refused to try for a male heir although he was seemingly happily married. His eldest daughter, Elizabeth, then became Queen at his death.
But she married.
 

Walter

Well-known member
Old World Underground
๐Ÿธ Citizen of the Internet ๐Ÿธ
โฐโ˜•๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฝ๐Ÿšฟ๐Ÿช’
 
Top