Here's How They Stole the Election ... No it wasn't the fake paper ballots No it Wasn't the Mail in Ballots

Herminator

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
Strange thought just popped into my head. I am wondering if the plan here wasn't massive riots?

We already know that Democratic leaders allow and encourage rioting in their states. So imagine having a democratic president - or thinking you have one.

Here are some scenarios.
Trump Wins on election day. BLM and Antifa Riots (as usual). No Trump supporters to engage. The winners have their win they don't need to fight in the street.
Biden Wins on election day. Most likely no riots. Trump supporters in the street maybe, but they have to be civil and graciously accept defeat.

What I am driving at is that the election fraud is this little piece of fruit that was left out on purpose for us to get all excited about. Of course it is important to have a fair election, but I think the real result that they wanted was a contested election because it presents the greatest chance of upheaval.

More scenarios.
The one we are in:
Trump clearly wins if you stayed up late (but not too late) watching the big board. Overnight stuff happens. Many such cases of fraud are exposed the following day - to the point where even the left is saying, C'mon guys! The media trickle out "results" and keep showing Biden at 264 while Trumps 214 never moves for days. Today, Biden is declared winner by the media. Trump rallies are happening and people are protesting the fraud. This is the only way to get Trump supporters out and protesting. Unlike the Left they would not protest a fair election even if they lost, it's just not in their nature. So they are actually deliberately exposing the fraud, putting it out there on purpose (nb4 claims of "then why are they censoring it" - you can't censor everything from everyone, so by "censoring" something they are just making sure that all the fringe right pick it up and get upset).

That's it there is no punchline. Just noticing that all these people ever do - what they are always compelled to do is to create chaos and havoc and this is just more of the same. So, yes obviously the election is important and we should pray for Trump, just remember that the dems didn't get "caught" in anything, the new plan is complete chaos all the time. They want us fighting over the next few months and they expect this to be dragged out and it is to their liking.

Do you really think they can come kill us with an executive order from Biden? It's better if our enemies feel like their leader won, and it was not fair, just like how we feel. I am generally expecting that they reverse course - at the absolute peak boiling point and say that TRUMP STEALS ELECTION AGAIN!

Then that is it. There is no better way to get the left as mad as possible. Gas and fire. I think that's the real goal.
 

Trevor

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
A microwave should automatically set its own clock, just like a cellphone does.
That's kind of silly. That would require some way to connect to a network. Which means no company would sell a microwave that connects to the web solely to sync the clock. They will put other features because 'muh data mining', because all companies are assholes now and don't care about privacy. Plus the amount of extra shit that needs to go in a device for connectivity even for basic NTP syncing means the device is more prone to random failures.

There are already smart microwaves including ones that do Alexa so they hear everything you say. I don't have/need/want such things in my house.
 

LudwigVonNeon

Poor Social Credit Score
Cave Beast
⏰
Do you really think they can come kill us with an executive order from Biden? It's better if our enemies feel like their leader won, and it was not fair, just like how we feel. I am generally expecting that they reverse course - at the absolute peak boiling point and say that TRUMP STEALS ELECTION AGAIN!

Then that is it. There is no better way to get the left as mad as possible. Gas and fire. I think that's the real goal.
I agree

They need a absolute raw emotion to accomplish this. The computer fraud presented so far looks like it can be sorted out and corrected easily. Either way a solid portion of the population gets riled up. Trump voters have to deal with the election being stolen from them, probably not enough to incite absolute chaos. If the election swings back to Trump then the emotional stimulus is there to get the left to do anything.
 

Quest 4 The Future

Out By Alpha Centauri
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»
A microwave should automatically set its own clock, just like a cellphone does.
That's kind of silly.
Silly? Well, then, I guess the engineers who designed the Amazon Smart Oven are a bunch of bozos, since their microwave automatically keeps the time set:


That would require some way to connect to a network.
Which is what the Amazon Smart Oven does. It uses Alexa but if you're concerned that it's eavesdropping on you don't buy it. Simple as that.
 

Mark

CEO MarkieBoy Brains Trust
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
A bit of a whitepill.... Scott Adams just finished a live stream as an addendum to his usual early daily video.

TL;DR - the Republicans should ask for a digital audit in the states that used voting machines. If an audit is not granted the electoral college could legally take matters into their own hands and decide who wins these particular states.

 

OldWhiteGuy

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
A thread about the greatest fraud in the history of the USA and some guys are arguing over microwave ovens. I guess we aren't supposed to have a thread like this?
 

adolfschicklgruber

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½
Listen gents there is no "stole the election." Our elections have been bullshit for AT LEAST 120 years. Bankers have controlled both parties and all candidates since before the Federal Reserve was created. What we are watching is the ignition of Civil War 2.0 using a presumed Biden "win" and a Trump "steal". Trump will not be leaving and will say he won. The chimp out will commence and the bullets will start to fly. Then we get our FEMA camps and lockdowns and forced vaccines cuz Corona is gonna come back. They would not whisper the word Covid ever again if Biden were to win. They need Corona and they need Trump to do the one world order. I promise you these elections dont mean shit. (((They))) will always win.
 

adolfschicklgruber

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½
They will assassinate him (either in character or quite literally) before that happens.

Keep your eyes on Pence!
Yes. Trump will win and then get taken out. They want to maximize the carnage and start the bullets flying.
 

JR_Rustler_III

πŸ‡°πŸ‡· Gookwaffen πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ–
If an audit is not granted the electoral college could legally take matters into their own hands and decide who wins these particular states.
So the TL;DW here is that the electors from the states where the elections weren't contested will decide who becomes President? If I'm not mistaken, wouldn't that also produce a Biden win?
 

Mark

CEO MarkieBoy Brains Trust
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
So the TL;DW here is that the electors from the states where the elections weren't contested will decide who becomes President? If I'm not mistaken, wouldn't that also produce a Biden win?
It only concerns the states where voting machines were used which are all or most of the swing states. But technically, I suppose the electors could overrule the election result of any state. If they did this, presumably they would need a good reason and have consensus amongst themselves to do it. In this case, there is good reason if these electors decide that the election result is sufficiently questionable, especially if an audit is requested and refused.
Still, this is only hypothetical. We don't know at this stage what course things are going to take.
 

anti-barabas-ite

Work stuff through in your brain...UNVAXXED
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ– πŸ’»
Escaped True Master
It only concerns the states where voting machines were used which are all or most of the swing states. But technically, I suppose the electors could overrule the election result of any state. If they did this, presumably they would need a good reason and have consensus amongst themselves to do it. In this case, there is good reason if these electors decide that the election result is sufficiently questionable, especially if an audit is requested and refused.
Still, this is only hypothetical. We don't know at this stage what course things are going to take.
Hillary is an "elector" for new york.

No elector is going against the party . Unless it's a repig
 

JR_Rustler_III

πŸ‡°πŸ‡· Gookwaffen πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ–
But technically, I suppose the electors could overrule the election result of any state.
What I'm not getting is that this basically means that some electors are going to try to literally throw some other electors (i.e. the Biden electors who were elected in the disputed states) out of the electoral college. That seems like an impossibility to me, unless the Biden electors start turning on each other--which is theoretically possible I guess (although impossible to imagine), at least for electors from states who don't have "faithless elector" laws. Because the Trump electors simply don't have the numbers.
 

Mark

CEO MarkieBoy Brains Trust
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
What I'm not getting is that this basically means that some electors are going to try to literally throw some other electors (i.e. the Biden electors who were elected in the disputed states) out of the electoral college. That seems like an impossibility to me, unless the Biden electors start turning on each other--which is theoretically possible I guess (although impossible to imagine), at least for electors from states who don't have "faithless elector" laws. Because the Trump electors simply don't have the numbers.
Yeah I'm not suggesting that this system will be our savior. Any system's only as good as the people in it. Perhaps my optimism is getting the better of me.
 

JR_Rustler_III

πŸ‡°πŸ‡· Gookwaffen πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ–
Yeah I'm not suggesting that this system will be our savior. Any system's only as good as the people in it. Perhaps my optimism is getting the better of me.
This seems to be a more informed take on the matter:

 

Walter

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
I'm going to make a retarded statement that I fully believe in.

Look at how ridiculous things are right now. We're all blackpilled af, but the dems are having massive meltdowns over seeing this massive fraud being gradually exposed. All they can do is beg the courts to stop investigating and yell 'COPE' into the void. In reality, this is even better than Trump being reelected on Tuesday. This serves to expose the corruption of the elites and their hypocrosy at the same time.
Trump is still winning in a roundabout way, Biden is running scared and cancelled his press conference because of the Pennsylvania ruling. Nothing from Kamala. Pelosi is going ape shit at everyone else.

I guess they expected Trump to just concede and walk away scott free.

I hate to be the one to say this, but the lulz are back, and the lulz are an even bigger weapon than Trump.
Why the F*ck is nobody talking about a new election?
 

Jay

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
Strange thought just popped into my head. I am wondering if the plan here wasn't massive riots?

We already know that Democratic leaders allow and encourage rioting in their states. So imagine having a democratic president - or thinking you have one.

Here are some scenarios.
Trump Wins on election day. BLM and Antifa Riots (as usual). No Trump supporters to engage. The winners have their win they don't need to fight in the street.
Biden Wins on election day. Most likely no riots. Trump supporters in the street maybe, but they have to be civil and graciously accept defeat.

What I am driving at is that the election fraud is this little piece of fruit that was left out on purpose for us to get all excited about. Of course it is important to have a fair election, but I think the real result that they wanted was a contested election because it presents the greatest chance of upheaval.

More scenarios.
The one we are in:
Trump clearly wins if you stayed up late (but not too late) watching the big board. Overnight stuff happens. Many such cases of fraud are exposed the following day - to the point where even the left is saying, C'mon guys! The media trickle out "results" and keep showing Biden at 264 while Trumps 214 never moves for days. Today, Biden is declared winner by the media. Trump rallies are happening and people are protesting the fraud. This is the only way to get Trump supporters out and protesting. Unlike the Left they would not protest a fair election even if they lost, it's just not in their nature. So they are actually deliberately exposing the fraud, putting it out there on purpose (nb4 claims of "then why are they censoring it" - you can't censor everything from everyone, so by "censoring" something they are just making sure that all the fringe right pick it up and get upset).

That's it there is no punchline. Just noticing that all these people ever do - what they are always compelled to do is to create chaos and havoc and this is just more of the same. So, yes obviously the election is important and we should pray for Trump, just remember that the dems didn't get "caught" in anything, the new plan is complete chaos all the time. They want us fighting over the next few months and they expect this to be dragged out and it is to their liking.

Do you really think they can come kill us with an executive order from Biden? It's better if our enemies feel like their leader won, and it was not fair, just like how we feel. I am generally expecting that they reverse course - at the absolute peak boiling point and say that TRUMP STEALS ELECTION AGAIN!

Then that is it. There is no better way to get the left as mad as possible. Gas and fire. I think that's the real goal.
Well then we just don't take the bait.
We let the winter months help cool off the left when they realize they lost. The cold helps keep riots at bay.
Then we bring a solution of separate city states to them in the spring or before. Wait for them to collapse on their own and take it all back later.
Reduce blood shed on booth sides and be on the moral high ground during the whole ordeal.
 

Particulating Splines

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
This HAMR/Scorecard thing was floating around fullchan research notables for quite a while now. I glossed over it and thought it was an autistic dead end. Powell going on Fox to talk about it slapped me across the face. Dobbs and his other guest look confused as hell after she mentions it.

It only concerns the states where voting machines were used which are all or most of the swing states. But technically, I suppose the electors could overrule the election result of any state. If they did this, presumably they would need a good reason and have consensus amongst themselves to do it. In this case, there is good reason if these electors decide that the election result is sufficiently questionable, especially if an audit is requested and refused.
Still, this is only hypothetical. We don't know at this stage what course things are going to take.
Hillary is an "elector" for new york.

No elector is going against the party . Unless it's a repig
Electors are different depending on who wins the state. Each person/party on the ballot chooses electors, but by my understanding, are ultimately chosen and made official by the legislature of said state. So one would have to convince the state legislature to choose the Trump electors by the deadline, and if not that, hope that there is a Democrat elector that has a change of heart and votes Trump when they cast their vote.

Electors have gone against the pledged vote, though this isn't common.
 

EdwardCase

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
its pretty telling that biden never needed to campaign and they chose an unliked vp from a state they would win anyway but was only chosen to not loose a senate seat because CA is a guaranteed democrat replacement. the smart move would have been a black woman from a state that was a toss up state to gain that state.
 

Particulating Splines

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
If Trump really has a plan, and really wanted to go after the deep state, how deep would he want to dig, and at what point is informing the public too late? Is he waiting to prove that members of the SC is corrupt as well? At what point would someone say, "Okay, we're going in". Yes, the longer he waits, the more worms come out of the woodwork, but I would think that after a certain point, people would be too entranced to believe it.
 
Top