Prince and Emperor
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
The most profound factor for obesity will always be calories taken in versus calories expended.
Which means being physically inactive while consuming more calories than your physical activity dictates.
Interesting side note, the sugar industry is dominated by the (((Cuban/Spanish))) Fanjul family. Most of you have never heard of them but they have cornered the sugar industry for the past 60 years. Fanjul Bros. wikiI'm not sure if UCFS is running cover for the ag chemical cartel? or the many many anti-sugar-ites are running cover for chemical cartel, but Robert Lustig sure makes a compelling case against HFCS.
Which is why I prefer to get my nutrition facts from racists on the internetNutrition science is bullshit, because it's all self reported, which makes the data worthless.
That's why you get articles about food-cholesterol causing high blood pressure, and at the same time you hear how everyone needs 10lbs of lettuce.
Interesting point. There are so many contaminants in the air, food and water, put there intentionally, accidentally or indifferently. Even if the medical system weren't satanic, it would be really hard to figure out which ones were the cause.Ever heard of TOFI?
Thin on outside Fat on inside.
Prolly just as many thin diabetics as fat.
Its mitochondrial disfunction due to toxic Inputs.
Not all diabetics are obese etc...its really a large feild to plow.
wat?Type of food intake does not cause obesity.
I never ate so much in my life than when I was in boot camp, and never been as sharp as i was then.PEOPLE ARE OBESE BECAUSE THEY CANT STOP FUCKING EATING!!! THEY EAT AND EAT AND EAT AND EAT.
I have absolutely 0 prejudice for alternative science, but if you make a statement like this you have to provide a confutation of the principle of conservation of Energy.Amount of food intake is only weakly associated with obesity.