Executive Action Continues: Biden Takes Shots at Gun Violence – Plans to Leave Gun Owners Leaking

Andrew Anglin

Guest


Joe Biden had a plan to punch at domestic violence.

Now he’s got a plan to fire shots at gun owners.

Ghost guns, pistols classified as rifles, red flags – it’s all here, folks.

The Guardian:

The Biden administration has unveiled several executive actions designed to curb gun violence, in the aftermath of the mass shootings in Atlanta and Boulder. The administration is also planning to nominate David Chipman, a former federal agent and gun control advocate, to direct the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

The actions include a directive that the justice department, within the next month, issue proposed regulations on “ghost guns” – unregistered firearms that can be assembled from parts.

Joe Biden will also direct the justice department to clarify regulations to ensure that pistols fitted with stabilizing braces, which essentially transform them into rifles, will be regulated under the National Firearms Act. Pistols are cheaper, and easier to carry across state lines, whereas rifles are more regulated. The suspect in the Boulder shooting used a pistol fitted with a brace that looks and operates like a rifle, and uses the same ammunition as the infamous AR-15, but isn’t regulated like a rifle under current laws.
Interesting.

What religion did he use? Was that fitted with anything?

A Koran, perhaps?

And the president will ask various agencies to direct more resources to community violence prevention measures, and call on the justice department to develop model “red flag” laws – which allow family members to petition courts to take firearms away from people who are deemed a threat – for states to take up and adopt. Several states, including Colorado, already have red flag laws on the books.

Officials said that these new measures are only a start, and that the administration will encourage Democrats in Congress to pass more gun control reforms and consider other executive actions to reduce gun violence.


Biden, who as vice-president was in charge of steering the Obama administration’s gun violence prevention efforts, promised ambitious reforms while campaigning for the presidency. In the run-up to the 2020 elections, he vowed to enact legislation requiring background checks for all gun sales, ban online firearms sales and ban the manufacture and sale of assault weapons and high capacity magazines – and regulate or buy back those already in circulation. Gun control advocates were disappointed at the president’s lack of immediate, early action after taking office – but welcomed Wednesday’s announcement.

“President Biden promised to take action on gun violence in his first 100 days in office, and today he delivered,” said former representative Gabby Giffords, who became a prominent anti-gun violence advocate after surviving a mass shooting. “These executive actions help address a crisis that devastates communities across the country on a daily basis.”
Gabby Giffords AKA “Ga-gul-gul-ga gul gul gul Gif ulg” is where we need to be getting our insights from.

She is a brave crisis actor, and her total inability to communicate with speech does nothing to stem the strength of her spirit.

She literally has complete brain damage, which has opened her eyes to the need to take guns away from law-abiding whites in order to stop blacks in Chicago from shooting each other.



About 95% of gun deaths are from handguns, and about 85% of the shooters are black. But acknowledging that is racist. I feel like a racist even for saying it.

Just like the government destroyed the economy and took everyone’s rights away because of a virus because they love you, they are also taking your guns because they love you.

The government represents one principle: love.

That’s why Donald Trump was such a big problem: he was a hater, and hate is not compatible with government, which is built to manufacture love alone.

That’s why I’m calling on Joe Biden to issue an executive order to replace the current national anthem – which is racist and evil – with a national anthem that truly represents American values: Wake Me Up Before You Go-Go by Wham.

Continue reading...
 

Astral-Pepe

Behind Enemy Lines
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓
Joe Biden will also direct the justice department to clarify regulations to ensure that pistols fitted with stabilizing braces, which essentially transform them into rifles, will be regulated under the National Firearms Act.
I knew that both the pistol braces and the rifles pretending to be pistols would be a problem as soon as I saw them. I said to guys at the gun store "That's a short barreled rifle, you know it is and I know it is" all I ever got back was "yeah well y'know the ATF says...". I never bought or owned or even shot one of these things and I always dissuaded others from buying them.

The 1934 National Firearms Act is the basis for Biden's action here and it was what Trump used to ban bump stocks. The 1934 NFA is the original sin against the 2A, it should have been challenged and overturned years ago. When it was passed the public was horrified that gangsters were using full-auto weapons, mostly to kill each other but also to kill a couple of police officers. At that time you could buy a Thompson submachinegun or a full-auto BAR with no more paperwork than buying a hunting rifle.

high capacity magazines – and regulate or buy back those already in circulation.
A magazine is just a box with a spring in it. If they're going to do buybacks on high capacity magazines then maybe now is the time to buy a 3D printer?
 

JR_Rustler_III

🇰🇷 Gookwaffen 🇯🇵
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
The 1934 National Firearms Act is the basis for Biden's action here and it was what Trump used to ban bump stocks.
You are 100% correct on pistol braces, it's easy to use the NFA to designate them as short-barrel rifles via "constructive possession", which immediately makes them subject to regulation under the provisions of law against short-barrel rifles. So that will get done right away. But as far as so-called "high capacity" magazines are concerned, there is nothing in the text of the NFA that helps Biden, at all. Similarly, the NFA cannot be used to ban "assault weapons". That's why the original Federal "assault weapons ban" was passed in 1994. If Clinton could have used the NFA against "assault weapons", he would have, but he couldn't. There is simply no amount of Talmudism that can make that work.

Bottom line is, Biden could certainly try going in this direction but the courts will overturn it right away. Of course the Biden administration would appeal it all the way to SCOTUS, but even SCOTUS isn't cucked enough to support such an approach.

Really the only approach is to pass new gun control laws. Obviously they don't have the votes for that, otherwise they would have done it already.
 

Astral-Pepe

Behind Enemy Lines
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓
Similarly, the NFA cannot be used to ban "assault weapons".
Agreed, the NFA is has very specific language about "machineguns":



The word "restored" was used rather than "converted" or "altered" because, even then, there were weapons of war that had their capacity to fire on full-auto removed and then resold to the civilian market. Semi-auto only rifles don't fit this definition at all. The language in the above is what allowed bump stocks to be banned even though many people thought they were legal. "A single function of the trigger" is what makes the bump stock work, the fact that the rest of the firearm recoils away from the trigger and allows it to reset is irrelevant.
 

billygoat

Unreconstructed Rebel
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
Agreed, the NFA is has very specific language about "machineguns":



The word "restored" was used rather than "converted" or "altered" because, even then, there were weapons of war that had their capacity to fire on full-auto removed and then resold to the civilian market. Semi-auto only rifles don't fit this definition at all. The language in the above is what allowed bump stocks to be banned even though many people thought they were legal. "A single function of the trigger" is what makes the bump stock work, the fact that the rest of the firearm recoils away from the trigger and allows it to reset is irrelevant.
Oh be sure that the letter of the law isn't going to stop them. If they can use the 14th amendment to justify faggot marriage and tranny rights then they can make the NFA work. It's only words and they can always interpret the words to mean anything.
 

billygoat

Unreconstructed Rebel
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
The 1934 NFA is the original sin against the 2A, it should have been challenged and overturned years ago.
Yes! Every aspect of it is a direct violation of the Bill of Rights. That and every other regulation and tax are exactly what the founding fathers meant by "shall not be infringed".
 

JR_Rustler_III

🇰🇷 Gookwaffen 🇯🇵
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
Oh be sure that the letter of the law isn't going to stop them. If they can use the 14th amendment to justify faggot marriage and tranny rights then they can make the NFA work. It's only words and they can always interpret the words to mean anything.
The 14th Amendment is a couple of vaguely-written sentences that can be interpreted and reinterpreted a bunch of different ways. The NFA, on the other hand, is a lengthy statute written in such excruciating detail that it's hard to get around. The Biden administration is pretty boxed in here.
 

billygoat

Unreconstructed Rebel
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
The 14th Amendment is a couple of vaguely-written sentences that can be interpreted and reinterpreted a bunch of different ways. The NFA, on the other hand, is a lengthy statute written in such excruciating detail that it's hard to get around. The Biden administration is pretty boxed in here.
I hope you're right. I pray you are. 10 years ago I would have said there's no doubt about it.

I just know that for years bump stocks were considered accessories and now pistol braces. It's all to easy for them to wiggle around the well thought out wording and change the enforcement. They can turn a legal gun owner into a felon without even altering the law.
 

JR_Rustler_III

🇰🇷 Gookwaffen 🇯🇵
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
I just know that for years bump stocks were considered accessories and now pistol braces.
The NFA expressly delegated the ATF to interpret the written statute in the face of new products like bump stocks or pistol braces. But the problem is, there was nothing in the language that required the ATF to adhere to its own precedents, which means their interpretations are 100% reversible, at any time. So, something that the ATF has ruled as being outside the scope of the NFA today, can be ruled as being within the scope of the NFA tomorrow. And obviously, since the ATF reports to the President, that implies that the ultimate authority to interpret the NFA lies in the President's hands. Trump set a stupid precedent (Trump doing something stupid, what a shock) when he ordered the ATF to determine that bump stocks were automatic-weapons-by-constructive-possession manufactured after 1986, which immediately made them illegal to own per the language of the Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986.

But all that said, the ATF--and the President--are still bound by the extremely detailed language of the statue itself. Bump stocks and pistol braces didn't exist when the NFA was written, so there was no specific language about them in the NFA, which gave the ATF the latitude to make determinations. But semiautomatic rifles and "high capacity" magazines definitely existed when the NFA was written, and the NFA did not restrict them in any way. So there's no latitude for the executive branch to "interpret" the language with respect to those things, as there is nothing to interpret. Their hands are tied.
 

zz_xx_zz_x

Well-known member
Cave Beast
Biden betrays his race to keep hunter safe.



According to what I read, Hunter begged Joe intensely to run for President so he could continue his debauchery and crack habit.
 

Brotaku

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
You are 100% correct on pistol braces, it's easy to use the NFA to designate them as short-barrel rifles via "constructive possession", which immediately makes them subject to regulation under the provisions of law against short-barrel rifles. So that will get done right away. But as far as so-called "high capacity" magazines are concerned, there is nothing in the text of the NFA that helps Biden, at all. Similarly, the NFA cannot be used to ban "assault weapons". That's why the original Federal "assault weapons ban" was passed in 1994. If Clinton could have used the NFA against "assault weapons", he would have, but he couldn't. There is simply no amount of Talmudism that can make that work.

Bottom line is, Biden could certainly try going in this direction but the courts will overturn it right away. Of course the Biden administration would appeal it all the way to SCOTUS, but even SCOTUS isn't cucked enough to support such an approach.

Really the only approach is to pass new gun control laws. Obviously they don't have the votes for that, otherwise they would have done it already.
They'll have the votes after they stage enough high-profile mass killings to sway public opinion in favor of another AWB. Check's in the mail.
 

Aquafina

Internet Fun Police
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
Ghost guns are terrifying, almost as bad as those guns that kill blacks all on their own. My Pisful is ready to go
 

billygoat

Unreconstructed Rebel
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
Biden’s New Executive Orders Could Turn a Whole Lot of Gun Owners Into FELONS
by Robert Wheeler



Joe Biden promised to do it and he has finally delivered. Today, the cognitively declining President of the United States signed a number of Executive Orders allegedly designed to “curb gun violence” but actually designed to destroy the Second Amendment and the Bill of Rights.

In the process, Biden has turned many Americans into felons with a stroke of his pen.

Details are still emerging as to just what the Executive Orders will mean for gun rights but we are aware of some of the ramifications.

Biden has signed 6 Executive Orders related to guns:

1.)Tightening regulations on “ghost guns.” Ghost guns are of course the labels liberals use to describe homemade firearms (because “we will win by slogans”) that are generally put together from parts assembled and drilled with machine tools. As a result, they often do not have serial numbers so it is harder for the government to be able to trace them. It is legal to build a gun in a home or workshop and there is no federal requirement for a background check. But Biden aims to stop this, saying his administration will “rein in the proliferation of so-called ‘ghost guns.’”

“These are guns that are homemade. Built from a kit that include directions on how to finish the firearm. You can go buy the kit. They have no serial numbers. So, when they show up at a crime scene they can’t be traced. And the buyers aren’t required to pass the background check to buy the kit. To make the gun. Consequently, anyone from a criminal to a terrorist can buy this kit for as little as 30 minutes, put together a weapon,” Biden explained.

Biden wants these guns treated as firearms under the Gun Control Act (1968 infringement on 2nd A). He argues that, under the act, key parts of gun-making kits would be required to have numbers for traceability and would also require background checks for people purchasing the kits.

The White House stated:
We are experiencing a growing problem: criminals are buying kits containing nearly all of the components and directions for finishing a firearm within as little as 30 minutes and using these firearms to commit crimes. When these firearms turn up at crime scenes, they often cannot be traced by law enforcement due to the lack of a serial number. The Justice Department will issue a proposed rule to help stop the proliferation of these firearms.

2.) Measure the “problem of gun violence” in a “data driven way.” The Justice Department will issue an annual report on firearms trafficking. According to the official White House statement:

In 2000, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) issued a report summarizing information regarding its investigations into firearms trafficking, which is one way firearms are diverted into the illegal market where they can easily end up in the hands of dangerous individuals. Since the report’s publication, states, local, and federal policymakers have relied on its data to better thwart the common channels of firearms trafficking. But there is good reason to believe that firearms trafficking channels have changed since 2000, for example due to the emergence of online sales and proliferation of “ghost guns.” The Justice Department will issue a new, comprehensive report on firearms trafficking and annual updates necessary to give policymakers the information they need to help address firearms trafficking today.
3.) The Justice Department, within 60 days, will issue a proposed rule to make clear when a device marketed as a stabilizing brace effectively turns a pistol into a short-barreled rifle subject to the requirements of the National Firearms Act. The alleged shooter in the Boulder tragedy last month appears to have used a pistol with an arm brace, which can make a firearm more stable and accurate while still being concealable,” the White House says.


4.) The Justice Department, within 60 days, will publish model “red flag” legislation for states.

From the White House:

Red flag laws allow family members or law enforcement to petition for a court order temporarily barring people in crisis from accessing firearms if they present a danger to themselves or others. The President urges Congress to pass an appropriate national “red flag” law, as well as legislation incentivizing states to pass “red flag” laws of their own. In the interim, the Justice Department’s published model legislation will make it easier for states that want to adopt red flag laws to do so.


5.) The Administration is investing in evidence-based community violence interventions.

Community violence interventions are proven strategies for reducing gun violence in urban communities through tools other than incarceration. Because cities across the country are experiencing a historic spike in homicides, the Biden-Harris Administration is taking a number of steps to prioritize investment in community violence interventions.
  • The American Jobs Plan proposes a $5 billion investment over eight years to support community violence intervention programs. A key part of community violence intervention strategies is to help connect individuals to job training and job opportunities.
  • The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is organizing a webinar and toolkit to educate states on how they can use Medicaid to reimburse certain community violence intervention programs, like Hospital-Based Violence Interventions.
  • Five federal agencies are making changes to 26 different programs to direct vital support to community violence intervention programs as quickly as possible. These changes mean we can start increasing investments in community violence interventions as we wait on Congress to appropriate additional funds
6.) The President will nominate David Chipman to serve as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms.

According to the White House:

ATF is the key agency enforcing our gun laws, and it needs a confirmed director in order to do the job to the best of its ability. But ATF has not had a confirmed director since 2015. Chipman served at ATF for 25 years and now works to advance commonsense gun safety laws.

It should be noted that Chipman served an important role in the coverup of the Oklahoma City Bombing and the First World Trade Center bombing and is now serving an even more important role in the war against American citizens.

Biden says no Amendments are absolute.

The President is unconvinced that these orders infringe on the Second Amendment but seems cool with it even if they do.

“Nothing, nothing I am about to recommend in any way impinges on the Second Amendment,” the president said, calling arguments suggesting that those constitutional rights are at stake “phony.”
“No amendment, no amendment to the Constitution is absolute,” he said. “You can’t yell ‘fire’ in a crowded movie theater — recall a freedom of speech. From the very beginning, you couldn’t own any weapon you wanted to own. From the very beginning that the Second Amendment existed, certain people weren’t allowed to have weapons.”
He added: “So the idea is just bizarre, to suggest that some of the things we’re recommending are contrary to the Constitution.” (source)
This is just the beginning.

Make no mistake, the Biden Administration is declaring war on the rights of the American people and the first act of resistance is non-compliance. But there seems to be more on the horizon both coming from the White House and Congress itself.
 

JR_Rustler_III

🇰🇷 Gookwaffen 🇯🇵
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
The Justice Department will issue a proposed rule to help stop the proliferation of these firearms.
"Will issue a proposed rule..." Yeah, good luck with that, let's see where they try to go with this. Like I said, there is nothing in the NFA that supports what he is trying to do here, so the levels of Talmudry required are going to be off the dial. It will be an interesting test of how completely fucked our judiciary is.

From the White House:
Red flag laws allow family members or law enforcement to petition for a court order temporarily barring people in crisis from accessing firearms if they present a danger to themselves or others. The President urges Congress to pass an appropriate national “red flag” law, as well as legislation incentivizing states to pass “red flag” laws of their own. In the interim, the Justice Department’s published model legislation will make it easier for states that want to adopt red flag laws to do so.
This is the real threat, right here. But they face a lot of challenges. Congress can pass a "red flag" law, but how will they enforce it absent a federal police force--the establishment of which would require a Constitutional amendment? This is the central conundrum they face, which is again why they will promote the violent breakdown of society, because "overturning the chessboard" is the most expedient way to accomplish their goals.

The President is unconvinced that these orders infringe on the Second Amendment but seems cool with it even if they do.
Of course the Biden administration doesn't care about the Second Amendment. But anything they do will wind up in front of SCOTUS, and with six nominal Republicans on the court, that will prove to be a dead end for Biden unless they can "convince" two of the six Republicans on the court to cave. That's possible but it would destroy whatever shreds of credibility the Republican party has, forever. That would be the "all-in" moment for the oligarchs.
 

billygoat

Unreconstructed Rebel
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
"Will issue a proposed rule..." Yeah, good luck with that, let's see where they try to go with this. Like I said, there is nothing in the NFA that supports what he is trying to do here, so the levels of Talmudry required are going to be off the dial. It will be an interesting test of how completely fucked our judiciary is.



This is the real threat, right here. But they face a lot of challenges. Congress can pass a "red flag" law, but how will they enforce it absent a federal police force--the establishment of which would require a Constitutional amendment? This is the central conundrum they face, which is again why they will promote the violent breakdown of society, because "overturning the chessboard" is the most expedient way to accomplish their goals.



Of course the Biden administration doesn't care about the Second Amendment. But anything they do will wind up in front of SCOTUS, and with six nominal Republicans on the court, that will prove to be a dead end for Biden unless they can "convince" two of the six Republicans on the court to cave. That's possible but it would destroy whatever shreds of credibility the Republican party has, forever. That would be the "all-in" moment for the oligarchs.
Sounds like we've got a fight on our hands then. Obviously our side is in the right, but that's no guarantee.
 
Top