cozy.tv

Cousin Groypley

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
Although it is questionable if any children will arise out of this relationship. God doesn't take kindly to satanists, and our friend here doesn't look like a fountain of male fertility.
I wouldn't be surprised if he's getting cucked.
 

Andrew Anglin

🐁 πŸŽ€ π“‚π’Άπ“ˆπ“‰π‘’π“‡ 𝒸𝒽𝒾𝑒𝒻 πŸŽ€ 🐁
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ–
If John Doyle is counter signaling incels than he's just an incel in denial. I know men much better looking than him that struggle with women.
But this is what is retarded: he famous on the internet.

It doesn't matter if he's handsome or not.

This is why all of this shit is bullshit. Retards tell me I can't get laid - that disheveled fat slob Mike Enoch can get laid, how would it be possible that I am on the cover of magazines and even recently in the NYT blamed as the mastermind behind Tucker Carlson, and I can't get laid? Regardless of the fact that I'm handsome and in fantastic shape - it doesn't matter. If you show your face and you're famous on the internet, you get laid. This is an absolute matter of fact. I'm aware that I did okay in terms of women before I was internet famous, but that doesn't even matter now. Jaden himself, an autistic retarded boy who literally bobs up and down and cowers with his shoulders hunched over, was apparently sipping that bomb pussy.

Also: I've been internet famous for a decade. This is not 2012 anymore. I was internet famous AFTER the Tinder explosion. Could I go out and get laid now, as a normal person? Frankly, I very much doubt I could pull that off in America, Australia or the UK, which are the incel hotspots. I am confident I could swing it in Asia, other nonwhite places, or Eastern Europe, maybe in Germany and German-related countries (Nordic countries) because women in those countries are more grounded and interested in conversation. But even if I'm handsome and have ripped abs and biceps, I'm still short and bald, and I just don't think in the smartphone sex app age - where most women are not even having sex, because they get attention from their phones and thirsty "pickup artists" in public - things would be very difficult.

So this is the thing: no one who is famous on the internet is in a position to tell men "why can't you just talk to girls?" It is absolute horseshit that these sickening people are so lacking in self-awareness that they do not understand that they are literally meeting women on the internet, exploiting their own internet fame for this purpose. It is the most disgusting thing imaginable.

Example: you've seen what TWP/TRS people look like. They are fat, ugly slobs. Some of them actually look like deformed mutant retards. They are not going to get laid. But Matt Heimbach, who is also a fat, mutant retard, is pulling all sorts of pussy because he's in TV segments about neo-Nazi street gangs. So he then goes out and says "oh I don't support these views on women, we should do traditionalist families." Obviously he was not doing traditionalist families, and was having sex with his mother in law, along with presumably other sluts in the trailer park. But that isn't the point. The point is: he was in no position to talk about the situations of men who are not internet famous.

At this point, I am a full incel, in terms of my entire worldview. I'm not obligated to get into my personal life, and it doesn't matter anyway, because I understand what most men - who are not famous on the internet - are dealing with. Assuming you are not just a sick faggot like Ramz Paul (who will not debate me), it is just wrong to go out there and talk about how you just think guys need to "man up" and "go out and talk to women and be themselves."

This is a whole conundrum I've written about on the main site a lot - all of these people insulting incels and talking about how you just have to man-up are either anonymous white knights who can't prove they are doing well with women, or they are e-celebrities who are going to do well with women regardless, because of their status. Mike Enoch is a hardcore Marxist-feminist, promoting believe all women and saying all men should submit to women. Someone posted pictures of his girlfriend and she was a nasty looking bitch, but if he wasn't famous on the internet, prostitutes would refuse this sweaty, deformed gargoyle. (Also, I imagine he could have done better than that skank he is with. He has built a small cult. It should be easy for him to draw in a much better skank.)

This is why I am against Nick getting a wife. Besides the fact it would distract him, it just skews his image and potentially his perception of what other men are going through. Also, he's already I think 24, which means he's over the horny hump. That's of course up to him, but I don't think he should listen to MILO or Kai about this. At the same time, he should also encourage his people to get married if they can, I guess. Maybe things will go better for the zoomers than they did for millennials. I've had some experience with women from this age group, and they do seem better. Also, society might collapse before these women have time to leave. But yeah, if you're 18-22 and your high school gf wants to get married and have kids, there are a lot worse things you could do. Crypto also provides a way for men to protect some of their wealth from women. So I think there should be more written about how young guys should deal with these situations, and I'm the man for it.

But no one who is even remotely famous on the internet has any right to tell anyone anything about how they need to man up to get pussy.
 

Andrew Anglin

🐁 πŸŽ€ π“‚π’Άπ“ˆπ“‰π‘’π“‡ 𝒸𝒽𝒾𝑒𝒻 πŸŽ€ 🐁
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ–
TRS knows they're wrong which is why they (a) talk shit about you behind your back but (b) refuse to engage with you publicly.
This is literally the gayest shit on earth. If you won't talk to me in public, then take my name out your mouth on your faggot cult podcast.

I wrote TRS e-mails and other messages, especially at the start of the COVID hoax, politely seeking an honest discourse on the matter - in public or private.
I don't understand why you do this. After Jayohgate, why on earth would you give these people any benefit of any doubt? What is the purpose of this?

All of these retards came at me like "why don't you talk to Mike???" Firstly, he blocked me. Secondly, I don't talk to fed snitches - outside of publicly.

They know where I am. I have had an open offer to debate anyone from TRS, other than their retard shill shields like that Australian drunk and shooting star Dingo who people only know of at all because Ralph promoted them. Mike Enoch, Erik Striker, Jazzhands, Sven - any of these people can meet me on the Killstream or anywhere else. With Enoch I've said outright that I will agree not to bring up his ratfaced kike wife, Jayoh, Cantwell, TWP, or any other thing he wants me to not bring up, so he doesn't have the excuse of saying "oh I can't talk to him because he will bring up all of my closet skeletons." It's goofy and ridiculous that he has a list of things he won't talk about (for reasons that are not legal-related), but okay. I will agree to not talk about whatever he doesn't want me to talk about, and I don't think any serious person can claim that I would agree to that and then break my word.

Imagine that he just keeps talking shit. Nigga you know where to find me.
 

Paul Harrell

Just more bullshit from the bullshit machine
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»
Escaped True Master
Baked Alaska is doing a call in show. Josh Moon, owner of kiwifarms, called in at one point according to this poster. Will be around roughly the 1:15:00ish mark on the replay.

1652568829273.png
 

Tyrann

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
At the risk of being (maybe rightfully) ridiculed, I'll elaborate on my thinking on the marriage question. I think the best way to get a woman pre-collapse is by wooing some 14-18 year old girl into giving her virginity to you(which is legal in Germany). Having grown up in a household filled with girls in this age range, I know it's not that difficult to do. Their hormones are literally primed for something like this to happen, if you know how to make them tingle. If you're their first, they'll fall madly in love with you. In fact I think one of the main reasons why it's so difficult in the US is because of the unreasonable age of consent. But you need a little luck and understanding. I've tested it out a little, while also swearing to myself that I will not sleep with a woman that I'm not ready to marry. But especially if you are a muscular guy in your mid 20's, girls in this age range will respond very well to you. I've talked about this in another thread, my hope is to get a young girl as a virgin, and then to keep the relationship(which should become a marriage as soon as possible) intact until extreme economic and thus social change happens. Anglin says the average for marriage is five years, in Germany it's probably a little bit more than that, and if you marry a girl whose first sexual partner you were, it will probably be at least 8-10 years from what I've seen. At this point, the collapse will probably already have happened, changing the sexual dynamics forever. And at least where I live(mid-size German town), attractive virgins between 14-16 are not impossible to find, because sexual relations are so destroyed that attractive people rarely find another. I cannot count how often I was walking at the foothills of the Swabian Jura with my backpack filled with wine and cigarettes, and I met young girls with their headphones on all alone in the woods, getting all flustered when I complimented them. Which is really abnormal behaviour for women if you think about it. I think there are many young girls with good instincts, that can be salvaged, at least before they start riding the carousel.
 

Andrew Anglin

🐁 πŸŽ€ π“‚π’Άπ“ˆπ“‰π‘’π“‡ 𝒸𝒽𝒾𝑒𝒻 πŸŽ€ 🐁
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ–
And average looking women think they can have a relationship with a chad just because they match with him online. When in reality, all they will get is a one night stand.
I think they're fine with that, frankly. Women are stupid whores, and they're only horny for like 48 hours a month when their T levels shoot up because their body is telling them to get fucked.

I listen to Red Ice and Henrick was talking about abortion and saying "all they have to do is not have sex for two days per month!" But it's a totally silly argument, because those two days are the only time a woman is interested in sex for any other reason than manipulating a man.

Men can't really understand that women visibly appear to enjoy sex a lot more than men, what with the screaming and moaning, but do not have any of the cravings for sex that men have. Even on the ovulation days, their horniness levels are nowhere near what a man's are on his lowest days. Testosterone is where the sex drive comes from, and women's endocrine systems only dump testosterone when the body wants them to take in seed in their gooey hole.

Women's testosterone nearly doubles for 48-72 hours, but it is still very low, comparatively. It's totally amazing that men are not aware of this fact about women. Women pretend to be horny constantly in order to manipulate men, and men are so uninformed that they just assume that women must have similar drives to them. But it is literally biologically impossible, unless the woman is on performance-enhancing drugs, or she is black.

Female-Hormone-Cycle.jpeg
 

LeTrav

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
Meh. They're teenagers from good families.

I'm not gonna say that you have to have:

  • Been the victim of a parental divorce
  • Broken bones in a skateboard crash
  • Had the shit beat out of you
  • Been in a serious car crash
  • Had a gun to your head/knife to your throat
  • Been fucked over by a woman
  • Worked in construction
  • Seen someone shoot mainline drugs
  • Killed animals with guns
  • Been assailed by niggers
  • Woken up drunk and lost in a city you don't recognize
  • Lived in a third world narco-state
  • Lived in a forest for an extended period
  • Lived in a black area

in order to develop a masculine outlook on life. I have had all those experiences. I don't think anyone needs to do any of those things, and most of those things people shouldn't do or have done to them.

HOWEVER - if you don't have any hardcore experiences, then you need to learn from other people who have had these kinds of experiences. A situation of total comfort from birth until present is not natural for man. In history, people wouldn't have had many of the experiences I've listed, but they would have had some very hardcore experiences involving death and violence.

Obviously, it is irresponsible to put yourself in these situations for the sake of masculine development. But you have to have some way of understanding what difficulty feels like. This is why I encourage combat sports and survivalist type activities. I think those are the two things that can really simulate hardcore experience without being harmful. With hardcore camping stuff, you can get in a situation where you realize "I could die here if I fuck this up." That is a good and important place to be. We all know people who went to Iraq/Afghanistan with the marines and came back hard.

Christ went into the desert mountains without any food. He also repeatedly stood up to Jews and Romans, without fear, and actually led a one-man assault on a Jew temple with nothing but a whip.

Nick I think has masculinity without having done any of these things, but we should understand that he's withstood all of these pressures from the feds, and said "come at me, bro." So I think there is a devotion to Christ that can challenge you in this way. But some of the AF people haven't yet been tested in this way. We've all seen the faggots who crack under the pressure when they are tested, and it's kind of like, you just have to wait for that test until you prove the thing either way.

The point is: it is struggle that makes people hardened. I don't think you can really blame people who haven't experienced struggle for not having experienced struggle - most of my own teenage and early 20s struggle was self-inflicted, and I don't think this is healthy or responsible, and actually demonstrates much more of an unbalanced mental state than it demonstrates bravery or masculinity. But it also lets you look back on the experiences with hindsight, and to process violence and carnage, and let that become a part of you.

This is a lot of stuff I wrote about in that book I canceled. What a sad thing.

I think "Christian solider" is the meme. But the problem is the test itself doesn't come until it comes. I'm ready to shoot it out or go to prison - whatever. I don't think anyone serious could really question that about me, because I've publicly made such a brutal scene of refusing to cooperate with Jews. Someone way up there a few days ago said that TRS fat/weird faggots called me a coward. Well, if this is cowardice. What?

I won't and don't sell myself as some kind of badass, and I don't support people doing that. But I'm here and people know where I be at. I've told these TRS people I will agree to any terms for a debate. Tell them to come find me. These faggots sucked fed cock and everyone knows it. I'm ready to burn with the ship. I don't have any other goals in life.

I wouldn't condemn these young guys as "not masculine." Hopefully they are hardening themselves for the struggles to come. I think Nick has clearly done that. He's willing to spit in the face of the feds and let the cards fall.

Gym shit is a way to simulate actual old fashioned work. I am against body building for aesthetics. Just so, it's clear people need to harden themselves to struggle through some simulated manner, if life/death conflict doesn't come their way.
From my interview with John Derbyshire:

You didn’t start writing until your 40s after having had a full career as a computer programmer and yet you rose to the top fairly quickly. Do you ever wish or wonder what would have happened if you had started writing earlier? Or like Hemingway, did you need to travel the world and run with some bulls (or in your case, star in a kung fu movie) to acquire your singular hardboiled world-weary Derb style?

Do I wonder? Yes, sometimes.

There’s a lot to be said for knocking around the world in your 20s and 30s: doing drudge work, getting into fights and love affairs, being penniless and hungry, getting swindled and beaten up. You come away with a clear understanding that greed, trickery, malice, stupidity, and brute force play much larger parts in human affairs than you would have believed at age 18. That’s good to know; and it makes the human virtues, when you encounter them, very impressive.

The House of Authorship has many mansions, though. If I’d lived a cloistered life and come to my 40s still innocent and unworldly, I might still have become a writer – just a different kind of writer. Plenty of good writers have led sheltered lives: Jane Austen comes to mind.
 

Tyrann

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
I think they're fine with that, frankly. Women are stupid whores, and they're only horny for like 48 hours a month when their T levels shoot up because their body is telling them to get fucked.

I listen to Red Ice and Henrick was talking about abortion and saying "all they have to do is not have sex for two days per month!" But it's a totally silly argument, because those two days are the only time a woman is interested in sex for any other reason than manipulating a man.

Men can't really understand that women visibly appear to enjoy sex a lot more than men, what with the screaming and moaning, but do not have any of the cravings for sex that men have. Even on the ovulation days, their horniness levels are nowhere near what a man's are on his lowest days. Testosterone is where the sex drive comes from, and women's endocrine systems only dump testosterone when the body wants them to take in seed in their gooey hole.

Women's testosterone nearly doubles for 48-72 hours, but it is still very low, comparatively. It's totally amazing that men are not aware of this fact about women. Women pretend to be horny constantly in order to manipulate men, and men are so uninformed that they just assume that women must have similar drives to them. But it is literally biologically impossible, unless the woman is on performance-enhancing drugs, or she is black.

View attachment 100871
You are right, but there is one thing to consider. What makes women enjoy sex is different from what makes men enjoy it. Similar to how women sometimes orgasm during rape(sorry for the vulgarity). Basically I think, while testosterone makes the man the initiator, the woman still enjoys it, because while she doesn't have the drive to initiate intercourse, she responds positively to having it being initiated on her, because that signals a virile male. The man wants to have sex with the woman, and the woman wants that the man forces himself on her(or just wants her). Not that a womans pleasure should ever be part of any consideration, but I'm just saying.
 

Andrew Anglin

🐁 πŸŽ€ π“‚π’Άπ“ˆπ“‰π‘’π“‡ 𝒸𝒽𝒾𝑒𝒻 πŸŽ€ 🐁
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ–
At the risk of being (maybe rightfully) ridiculed, I'll elaborate on my thinking on the marriage question. I think the best way to get a woman pre-collapse is by wooing some 14-18 year old girl into giving her virginity to you(which is legal in Germany). Having grown up in a household filled with girls in this age range, I know it's not that difficult to do. Their hormones are literally primed for something like this to happen, if you know how to make them tingle. If you're their first, they'll fall madly in love with you. In fact I think one of the main reasons why it's so difficult in the US is because of the unreasonable age of consent. But you need a little luck and understanding. I've tested it out a little, while also swearing to myself that I will not sleep with a woman that I'm not ready to marry. But especially if you are a muscular guy in your mid 20's, girls in this age range will respond very well to you. I've talked about this in another thread, my hope is to get a young girl as a virgin, and then to keep the relationship(which should become a marriage as soon as possible) intact until extreme economic and thus social change happens. Anglin says the average for marriage is five years, in Germany it's probably a little bit more than that, and if you marry a girl whose first sexual partner you were, it will probably be at least 8-10 years from what I've seen. At this point, the collapse will probably already have happened, changing the sexual dynamics forever. And at least where I live(mid-size German town), attractive virgins between 14-16 are not impossible to find, because sexual relations are so destroyed that attractive people rarely find another. I cannot count how often I was walking at the foothills of the Swabian Jura with my backpack filled with wine and cigarettes, and I met young girls with their headphones on all alone in the woods, getting all flustered when I complimented them. Which is really abnormal behaviour for women if you think about it. I think there are many young girls with good instincts, that can be salvaged, at least before they start riding the carousel.
I agree with all of that, mostly, which is why I was saying that if guys want to marry their "high school sweetheart," I am not against this.

The one thing I will say is that although the relationship will be stronger starting out, I wouldn't count on it to last longer. Depending on how much you can corner the bitch, she is still going to have people whispering in her ear about "oh my God, you married your first? Are you sad you missed out on so many experiences?" Even seemingly nice old sluts will be whispering this to her, or saying it in a normal pitch.

I also mentioned Germany above, and I think that for whatever reason German women are not nearly as bad as Anglo women. Like, they're not Asians loving you long time, but it's a pretty big gap between Anglos and Germans. Some of that has to do with English being the poison language, but it's a lot to do with Germans specifically (as well as other German-derived peoples, excluding Anglo-Saxons) just having a more measured and less extreme approach to life. Not even young French people speak English, and the French are opposed to a lot of weird gay shit, consent theory, and like, celebrating mass abortion or late term abortion, but their women are still utterly unhinged whores. Not as bad as Anglos, but pretty close.
 

Andrew Anglin

🐁 πŸŽ€ π“‚π’Άπ“ˆπ“‰π‘’π“‡ 𝒸𝒽𝒾𝑒𝒻 πŸŽ€ 🐁
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ–
You are right, but there is one thing to consider. What makes women enjoy sex is different from what makes men enjoy it. Similar to how women sometimes orgasm during rape(sorry for the vulgarity). Basically I think, while testosterone makes the man the initiator, the woman still enjoys it, because while she doesn't have the drive to initiate intercourse, she responds positively to having it being initiated on her, because that signals a virile male. The man wants to have sex with the woman, and the woman wants that the man forces himself on her(or just wants her). Not that a womans pleasure should ever be part of any consideration, but I'm just saying.
I've compared the woman sex experience to a non-junkie shooting heroin. He has no drive to do it, but he's still going to feel great if he does do it. Women do appear to get extreme physical sensation from sex. But I agree that this is all tied up with complicated, sick emotions relating to a desire to have the full focus of a man's attention.

Historically, men did not really pay much attention to women in general, because why would you. Meanwhile, a woman's entire self-esteem comes from men, so during the sex act, getting all of this attention, it is an extreme narcissism experience for women. As I've always argued, the physical body is an extension of the consciousness, so it makes sense that women would get extreme physical pleasure from what is basically an act of shameless self-promotion.
 

Tyrann

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
I've compared the woman sex experience to a non-junkie shooting heroin. He has no drive to do it, but he's still going to feel great if he does do it. Women do appear to get extreme physical sensation from sex. But I agree that this is all tied up with complicated, sick emotions relating to a desire to have the full focus of a man's attention.

Historically, men did not really pay much attention to women in general, because why would you. Meanwhile, a woman's entire self-esteem comes from men, so during the sex act, getting all of this attention, it is an extreme narcissism experience for women. As I've always argued, the physical body is an extension of the consciousness, so it makes sense that women would get extreme physical pleasure from what is basically an act of shameless self-promotion.
I mean, it's just retarded that men have to waste time on analizing women's behaviour at all. We should all have better things to do. Women are what they have to be, which doesn't make them inherently evil, but they'll become evil as soon as the men stop controlling their every step. Their self-centeredness has a purpouse, so it's like whatever. Honestly, what I hate most about women is their stupidity and their thirst for punishment. As an example, a couple of months ago, I made a thread about my sister bringing home a tunisian. My father forbid me from kicking him out. My sister knew my position on this, but did it anyway. I was so disgusted that I stopped talking to her or doing nice things for her. You can guess what happened next. All of the sudden, she wasn't interested in him, and was nicer to me than ever before. In some way, I'm glad that happened, but at the same time, I actually don't enjoy being an asshole, and it's just tiring to play those dumb games with women. In an ideal world, I'd have just given her a good beating and that would have been the end of it. Oh well.
 
Last edited:

Paul Harrell

Just more bullshit from the bullshit machine
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»
Escaped True Master
Also sorry @Paul Harrell , I know this isn't the Tyrann's women trouble thread.
It's no big deal. I don't like the bickering about Christianity in particular because it just goes in circles forever with no conclusion. I also think it's rude and inappropriate to tell others that they're worshipping Christ the wrong way.
 

Tyrann

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
It's no big deal. I don't like the bickering about Christianity in particular because it just goes in circles forever with no conclusion. I also think it's rude and inappropriate to tell others that they're worshipping Christ the wrong way.
Well that makes me glad. Btw, if I saw it correctly, Nick didn't do a GU reaction on his friday stream after all. Although I only had time to skim the stream. Very saddening. Would've been great content.
 

Benvenuto Cellini

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
At the risk of being (maybe rightfully) ridiculed, I'll elaborate on my thinking on the marriage question. I think the best way to get a woman pre-collapse is by wooing some 14-18 year old girl into giving her virginity to you(which is legal in Germany). Having grown up in a household filled with girls in this age range, I know it's not that difficult to do. Their hormones are literally primed for something like this to happen, if you know how to make them tingle. If you're their first, they'll fall madly in love with you. In fact I think one of the main reasons why it's so difficult in the US is because of the unreasonable age of consent. But you need a little luck and understanding. I've tested it out a little, while also swearing to myself that I will not sleep with a woman that I'm not ready to marry. But especially if you are a muscular guy in your mid 20's, girls in this age range will respond very well to you. I've talked about this in another thread, my hope is to get a young girl as a virgin, and then to keep the relationship(which should become a marriage as soon as possible) intact until extreme economic and thus social change happens. Anglin says the average for marriage is five years, in Germany it's probably a little bit more than that, and if you marry a girl whose first sexual partner you were, it will probably be at least 8-10 years from what I've seen. At this point, the collapse will probably already have happened, changing the sexual dynamics forever. And at least where I live(mid-size German town), attractive virgins between 14-16 are not impossible to find, because sexual relations are so destroyed that attractive people rarely find another. I cannot count how often I was walking at the foothills of the Swabian Jura with my backpack filled with wine and cigarettes, and I met young girls with their headphones on all alone in the woods, getting all flustered when I complimented them. Which is really abnormal behaviour for women if you think about it. I think there are many young girls with good instincts, that can be salvaged, at least before they start riding the carousel.

I've personally experienced that this is true with girls in that age range. If I didn't get deployed at the time, I'd be married right now. Of course that doesn't mean the marriage would last the current regime.
 

Benvenuto Cellini

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
I've compared the woman sex experience to a non-junkie shooting heroin. He has no drive to do it, but he's still going to feel great if he does do it. Women do appear to get extreme physical sensation from sex. But I agree that this is all tied up with complicated, sick emotions relating to a desire to have the full focus of a man's attention.

Historically, men did not really pay much attention to women in general, because why would you. Meanwhile, a woman's entire self-esteem comes from men, so during the sex act, getting all of this attention, it is an extreme narcissism experience for women. As I've always argued, the physical body is an extension of the consciousness, so it makes sense that women would get extreme physical pleasure from what is basically an act of shameless self-promotion.
I dunno man, men seemed to have a strong lust for women even in the 16th century. 18th Century was almost just like today except with better laws which worked in the mans favor. But 16th Century forward is really going into the early stages of the liberal mindset circulating at the time. Cellini and Casanova's encounters with women are very enlightening as to how the male/female dynamic was and should actually be without Feminism. There is a good reason that Benvenuto Cellini's autobiography is on Ted Kaczynski's reading list.

Casanova even believes that women's sex drive is greater than mens and that they enjoy it more. I cannot stress how eye opening Casanova's Memoirs are into female sexual behavior. It is a black pill, a red pill, and a white pill all at once. Very dense, but since Casanova is a good writer you aren't going to want the book to end anyways. I've read a lot of books in my life, but absolutely nothing comes close to Casanova's Memoirs.
 

Benevolent Landlord

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
I also think it's rude and inappropriate to tell others that they're worshipping Christ the wrong way.
No it isn't. It's literally Christian love. I wouldn't put time and energy into telling prots they're wrong if I didn't care for their souls. The intra-Catholic argument here wasn't about anyone worshipping incorrectly. It was Church politics. Everyone involved recognized the validity of both forms of worship.
 

Benvenuto Cellini

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
No it isn't. It's literally Christian love. I wouldn't put time and energy into telling prots they're wrong if I didn't care for their souls. The intra-Catholic argument here wasn't about anyone worshipping incorrectly. It was Church politics. Everyone involved recognized the validity of both forms of worship.
Jesus states that no one comes to the Father except through Me.
 

Cousin Groypley

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
I think they're fine with that, frankly. Women are stupid whores, and they're only horny for like 48 hours a month when their T levels shoot up because their body is telling them to get fucked.

I listen to Red Ice and Henrick was talking about abortion and saying "all they have to do is not have sex for two days per month!" But it's a totally silly argument, because those two days are the only time a woman is interested in sex for any other reason than manipulating a man.

Men can't really understand that women visibly appear to enjoy sex a lot more than men, what with the screaming and moaning, but do not have any of the cravings for sex that men have. Even on the ovulation days, their horniness levels are nowhere near what a man's are on his lowest days. Testosterone is where the sex drive comes from, and women's endocrine systems only dump testosterone when the body wants them to take in seed in their gooey hole.

Women's testosterone nearly doubles for 48-72 hours, but it is still very low, comparatively. It's totally amazing that men are not aware of this fact about women. Women pretend to be horny constantly in order to manipulate men, and men are so uninformed that they just assume that women must have similar drives to them. But it is literally biologically impossible, unless the woman is on performance-enhancing drugs, or she is black.

View attachment 100871
Agreed, they would definitely prefer casual sex with a chad to a relationship with a beta male. They will rationalize in their head that it is ok to sleep with chad on the first date, because they are assuming a relationship is on the table. Or if it doesn't work out, they will simply wipe it from their memory like they do with other one night stands, because they are sociopaths.

I find it ironic how little feminist "men" actually know about the nature of women, and they get burned as a result, time after time. Just like multiculturalism is an excuse to not actually learn about the differences between cultures, feminism is an excuse not to learn about the differences between the sexes.
 

Paul Harrell

Just more bullshit from the bullshit machine
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»
Escaped True Master
Paul Town and Jimbo are reviewing the mass shooter manifesto
1652578352471.png

The shooter appears to be anti crypto lol
 

Rocky from the Backwoods

America First Midwesterner
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
also mentioned Germany above, and I think that for whatever reason German women are not nearly as bad as Anglo women. Like, they're not Asians loving you long time, but it's a pretty big gap between Anglos and Germans. Some of that has to do with English being the poison language, but it's a lot to do with Germans specifically (as well as other German-derived peoples, excluding Anglo-Saxons) just having a more measured and less extreme approach to life. Not even young French people speak English, and the French are opposed to a lot of weird gay shit, consent theory, and like, celebrating mass abortion or late term abortion, but their women are still utterly unhinged whores. Not as bad as Anglos, but pretty close.
Women of Anglo and also Dutch (they actually read as the same thing on Ancestry's DNA test, the Dutch are just really cheap English people that speak retard German in swamps) descent are just unmitigated cunts. My own family has enough Celt and Germanic blood in them to mitigate this, but the parts of my family that are pureblood Anglo, it is amazing how uniformly stuck up and stiff, while at the same time preachy and shrill, they are. Still proud of my heritage but theme's the facts.

I'd recommend to the bros out here girls of Polak descent. They are gonna be stocky after 25 and fully heading towards babushka status after 30, but being the last decent group of white immigrants (idk about Ukrainians or Greeks or any of these Cold War post-1965 immigrants, none around here), you've got the best chance they had a grandma who taught them how to cook and bake and instilled some notion of being a woman in them. In line with what Anglin said, German and to a lesser extent Scandinavian chicks are a good option too, especially German Catholic chicks (once again it's about playing the odds with the grandma thing and they are more recent than 48-er descended Lutheran German chicks). Only do not recommends on my list are the aforementioned Anglo and Dutch girls, but additionally Irish chicks who you don't want to mess with for the exact opposite reason of the other two, namely, that they are completely insane and Jewish-level neurotic. They truly are white Mexicans on every level.

But anyway, my two cents is this. I think the notion of Nick lifting and potentially getting a gf are not the worst things in the world and I don't think Kai, John or Milo are wrong for encouraging that. I understand and empathize with every argument that "incels" make about the condition of modern women, and I have Zoomer buddies that I talk to about their dating lives and feel so bad for because if you think Millennial chicks were bad, they look like 50s housewives compared to these Zoomer cunts. You wanna talk about social media as a psyop, it has fully taken them.

But on that same token, I feel like embracing the incel identity is very much the response that the people doing this want. To render us into seething anti-social perma-virgins in response to the Instagram induced whoredom of young women. We fit neatly into the box of "basement dwelling blah-blah-blah" with that and play right into every stereotype they can exaggerate to paint us as permanently uncool losers.

This whole "I am an incel!" thing comes off as the "they're gonna call us Nazis anyway bro" of 2022. Just like how the reason they were calling us Nazis was because we were speaking the truth on race realism and demographic changes, they are doing the same thing with the incel moniker because we are speaking the truth about the cursed nature of social media and modern women. But when we embrace the epithet we only serve to be the noodle-arned four eyed mouth breathing seething basement dweller of their creation in the popular zeitgeist, same as they made us into the shaved head Hale Hortler 18/84 guys 5 years ago.

It's also just tactically not advantageous because you end up defending yourself and arguing over the definition of incel, rather than getting the legitimate arguments out there. Guerilla meme warfare is the most effective form of psychological warfare in the internet space. Don't let your enemy know your background or where you're coming from, just hit them with the truth. Don't get bogged down defending Elliot Rodger (or Adolf Hitler) when you could be stating the obvious truth.

So in short, Nick lifting, getting in shape abd getting a decent girl would squash so much of the bullshit that they hit him with. Imagine he's on Slightly Offensive and that dingo cunt starts in on him "Duz yeh gulfren know ya talk lahk 'is mate?" and Nick can lower his brows and smile and say "yes she does actually",
"Oi, oi kent imagine lettin moi min tawk ta me loik that",
"that's okay, she's way hotter than you so she probably doesn't have alot of these deep-seated insecurities you do and can embrace submitting herself to a Chad" he said laughing

Now obviously that last line is bullshit that doesn't make any sense but it would cause a level 80 meltdown for Sydney, and even slowly making jabs at her throughout the course of the show about his girlfriend being better looking "she doesn't wear as much makeup as you do", "she's got a great body but she doesn't have to show it off when she goes to the beach to make herself feel better", would drive her insane and be a legendary W.

That's just one example, nothing fucks a woman (or a simp) up more than being a misogynist who gets pussy. It is the defeat of every single one of the arguments in their playbook and in front of other guys it makes you look like a total boss. That's who everybody who hammers Nick on the Catboy shit or the virginity shit is.

Besides that he has a huge audience full of young guys and he is their ideal. Now if Nick can get ripped and score a good woman after being the scion of the charismatic funny far-right incel Zoomer he gives those young guys hope. He gives them an ideal to strive for.

And I thoroughly believe we need that right now. Being blackpilled on stuff puts you in a negative mindset and you begin filtering all information through that mindset, reinforcing it and galvanizing it. It inevitably leads to not actually doing anything because you are convinced that the outcome is predestined. A man who believes he is fighting the tides of fate itself is less likely to accomplish anything because the path of least resistance is the human path.

Men need visions, they need dreams, dreams they feel they can attain and if they can see an example, a path, a way to get where they want to be, they can tell themselves that they are not doom-driven, their fate is not already sealed. They can convince themselves the opposite is true. That is what Nick could provide to these young guys. A shining example of the righteous path with laughing disregard for your enemies.

I always hear revolutions only happen when disaffected young men have nothing. When they are out of options they will throw themselves into the gears of the machine and destroy it. I hear this but I cannot remember a single righteous revolution where this is the case.

1776 was not the work of disaffected young men but family men, community leaders, captains of industry and business. 1933 was not a revolution of such men, but of everyday Germans who did not want their child turned into a tranny stripper in a Berlin night club. Revolutions do not come from men who have nothing, but men who have everything that matters and cannot bare the thought of losing it. Be it their land, their religious beliefs, always their families. These are the things you will do anything to protect.

So we need these young men to build families, to own land, to become heads of the community they live in. To have something to stand for that isn't vague political notions. Nick can give them something to look up to. I hope he does
 
Top