BREAKING: US Supreme Court Rules NY Concealed Firearms Restriction Violates 2nd Amendment

Gian

Well-known member
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ– πŸ’»πŸ₯©πŸ₯ƒπŸ“–
Destructive Ceremonious Master
🚨BREAKING: US Supreme Court Rules NY Concealed Firearms Restriction Violates 2nd Amendment
Thanks to @anti-barabas-ite
@Panzerhund @TimeBandit @Auslander-Raus!
The U.S. Supreme Court building is shown as people walk past, Wednesday, May 4, 2022 in Washington. A draft opinion suggests the U.S. Supreme Court could be poised to overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade case that legalized abortion nationwide, according to a Politico report released Monday - Sputnik International, 1920, 23.06.2022

Β© AP Photo / Alex Brandon


The US Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a New York State law that prohibited individuals from carrying a firearm without specific cause on the grounds that it violates the 14th amendment of the Constitution, according to a decision written by Justice Clarence Thomas.

The New York State law in question required individuals who wished to carry a firearm outside their home to prove that they have β€œproper cause” to do so based on a special need for self-defense beyond that of an ordinary citizen.

β€œNew York’s proper-cause requirement violates the Fourteenth Amendment by preventing law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms in public for self-defense,” the US Supreme Court said.

Thomas argued that no other constitutional right requires a citizen to demonstrate to the government the need to exercise that right.
This photo on Friday, March 26, 2021, shows the front door of the Eagles Nest Armory gun shop in Arvada, Colo. - Sputnik International, 1920, 12.06.2022
Senate Lawmakers Agree on Outline of Bipartisan Gun Deal With 'Modest' Curbs for Firearms Access

12 June, 15:47 GMT

The New York State law prevents law-abiding citizens from exercising their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms, Thomas concluded.
 
Last edited:

RickGozinya

Well-known member
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ–
YEEEESSSSS. I don't even give a fuck about NY state but any pro 2A ruling makes me happy πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘.

I would actually care about other than PA border states if I wasn't automatically a felon once I see the Welcome to NJ or I❀NY signs.
 

Gian

Well-known member
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ– πŸ’»πŸ₯©πŸ₯ƒπŸ“–
Destructive Ceremonious Master
This ruling was a big deal, because leftist forums are despairing over it and saying the courts must be stacked.
 

Gian

Well-known member
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ– πŸ’»πŸ₯©πŸ₯ƒπŸ“–
Destructive Ceremonious Master
In the interest of schadenfreude please provide links to these leftist forums, thanks


SCOTUS gun rights ruling upsets journos on Twitter: 'Plainly insane'
One journalist tweeted that the Court will have blood on its hands



Rage on Twitter:

 
Last edited:

Panzerhund

✝️ Non nisi te Domine ✝️
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ– πŸ’»πŸ₯©πŸ₯ƒπŸ“–
Destructive Ceremonious Master
Will NY abide by the ruling or just ignore it and do what they do?
 

Luqid

aLienating my customer base
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
Escaped True Master
This is a big win!
It's legal to own a gun.
Its just illegal to defend yourself.

n b 4
Kyle was a fluke in the scenario. A glitch in the matrix if you will. Along with ZAM.

Very high profile. But! When isolated locally out of the spotlight. You're going to go to deathrow, not the record label, defending yourself.
 

JasonVorhees

#StandWithPutin
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺ️
Escaped True Master
This is a big win!
It's legal to own a gun.
Its just illegal to defend yourself.

n b 4
Kyle was a fluke in the scenario. A glitch in the matrix if you will. Along with ZAM.

Very high profile. But! When isolated locally out of the spotlight. You're going to go to deathrow, not the record label, defending yourself.
No, not in America. You usually can get off and most of the time won't be charged at all if its legit self defense and you call the police. Kyle was a fluke because the court ruled honestly and didn't fold to media and leftist pressure.

Maybe NYC is different.
 
Top