Bergoglio Drops The Big One: Nukes the Latin Mass in Defiance of the Infallible Doctrine of Pope St. Pius V

JR_Rustler_III

πŸ‡°πŸ‡· Gookwaffen πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ– πŸ’»πŸ₯©
Destructive Ceremonious Master
I am not exaggerating when I suggest this is huge. First, Bergoglio is directly contradicting Pope St. Pius V, who declared that the Missal of the Tridentine Rite, which we know today as the "traditional latin mass", was to be

"...freely and lawfully to be used, without any scruple of conscience or fear of incurring any penalty or censure…
No one whosoever is permitted to alter this notice of Our permission, statute, ordinance, command, precept, grant, indult, declaration, will, decree, and prohibition.
Should anyone dare to contravene it, let him know that he will incur the wrath of Almighty God and of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul.”


Bergoglio today has dared to contravene it. It sure sounds to me like Pope St. Pius V is putting Bergoglio on notice.

Second, Bergoglio is also directly contradicting his immediate predecessor (and true living Pope) Benedict XVI, who years ago issued his own Motu Proprio clarifying the results of Vatican II by declaring that any priest who desires to celebrate the Latin Mass is free to do so at any time, without needing to ask for permission from his superiors.

Here is the text of Bergoglio's Motu Proprio:

ISSUED β€œMOTU PROPRIO”

BY THE SUPREME PONTIFF (sic)

FRANCIS (sic)

β€œTRADITIONIS CUSTODES”

ON THE USE OF THE ROMAN LITURGY PRIOR TO THE REFORM OF 1970

Guardians of the tradition, the bishops in communion with the Bishop of Rome constitute the visible principle and foundation of the unity of their particular Churches.[1] Under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, through the proclamation of the Gospel and by means of the celebration of the Eucharist, they govern the particular Churches entrusted to them.[2]

In order to promote the concord and unity of the Church, with paternal solicitude towards those who in any region adhere to liturgical forms antecedent to the reform willed by the Vatican Council II, my Venerable Predecessors, Saint John Paul II and Benedict XVI, granted and regulated the faculty to use the Roman Missal edited by John XXIII in 1962.[3] In this way they intended β€œto facilitate the ecclesial communion of those Catholics who feel attached to some earlier liturgical forms” and not to others.[4]

In line with the initiative of my Venerable Predecessor Benedict XVI to invite the bishops to assess the application of the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum three years after its publication, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith carried out a detailed consultation of the bishops in 2020. The results have been carefully considered in the light of experience that has matured during these years.

At this time, having considered the wishes expressed by the episcopate and having heard the opinion of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, I now desire, with this Apostolic Letter, to press on ever more in the constant search for ecclesial communion. Therefore, I have considered it appropriate to establish the following:

Art. 1. The liturgical books promulgated by Saint Paul VI and Saint John Paul II, in conformity with the decrees of Vatican Council II, are the unique expression of the lex orandi of the Roman Rite.

Art. 2. It belongs to the diocesan bishop, as moderator, promoter, and guardian of the whole liturgical life of the particular Church entrusted to him,[5] to regulate the liturgical celebrations of his diocese.[6] Therefore, it is his exclusive competence to authorize the use of the 1962 Roman Missal in his diocese, according to the guidelines of the Apostolic See.

Art. 3. The bishop of the diocese in which until now there exist one or more groups that celebrate according to the Missal antecedent to the reform of 1970:

Β§ 1. is to determine that these groups do not deny the validity and the legitimacy of the liturgical reform, dictated by Vatican Council II and the Magisterium of the Supreme Pontiffs;

Β§ 2. is to designate one or more locations where the faithful adherents of these groups may gather for the eucharistic celebration (not however in the parochial churches and without the erection of new personal parishes);

Β§ 3. to establish at the designated locations the days on which eucharistic celebrations are permitted using the Roman Missal promulgated by Saint John XXIII in 1962.[7] In these celebrations the readings are proclaimed in the vernacular language, using translations of the Sacred Scripture approved for liturgical use by the respective Episcopal Conferences;

Β§ 4. to appoint a priest who, as delegate of the bishop, is entrusted with these celebrations and with the pastoral care of these groups of the faithful. This priest should be suited for this responsibility, skilled in the use of the Missale Romanum antecedent to the reform of 1970, possess a knowledge of the Latin language sufficient for a thorough comprehension of the rubrics and liturgical texts, and be animated by a lively pastoral charity and by a sense of ecclesial communion. This priest should have at heart not only the correct celebration of the liturgy, but also the pastoral and spiritual care of the faithful;

Β§ 5. to proceed suitably to verify that the parishes canonically erected for the benefit of these faithful are effective for their spiritual growth, and to determine whether or not to retain them;

Β§ 6. to take care not to authorize the establishment of new groups.

Art. 4. Priests ordained after the publication of the present Motu Proprio, who wish to celebrate using the Missale Romanum of 1962, should submit a formal request to the diocesan Bishop who shall consult the Apostolic See before granting this authorization.

Art. 5. Priests who already celebrate according to the Missale Romanum of 1962 should request from the diocesan Bishop the authorization to continue to enjoy this faculty.

Art. 6. Institutes of consecrated life and Societies of apostolic life, erected by the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, fall under the competence of the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies for Apostolic Life.

Art. 7. The Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments and the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life, for matters of their particular competence, exercise the authority of the Holy See with respect to the observance of these provisions.

Art. 8. Previous norms, instructions, permissions, and customs that do not conform to the provisions of the present Motu Proprio are abrogated.
Everything that I have declared in this Apostolic Letter in the form of Motu Proprio, I order to be observed in all its parts, anything else to the contrary notwithstanding, even if worthy of particular mention, and I establish that it be promulgated by way of publication in β€œL’Osservatore Romano”, entering immediately in force and, subsequently, that it be published in the official Commentary of the Holy See, Acta Apostolicae Sedis.

Given at Rome, at Saint John Lateran, on 16 July 2021, the liturgical Memorial of Our Lady of Mount Carmel, in the ninth year of Our Pontificate (sic).

FRANCIS (sic)
Taylor Marshall spoke about this in detail today. I haven't had the chance to listen to the entire thing yet, but here it is.


Ann Barnhardt, of course, has been going ham on this.



Remember: NOTHING IS OVER UNTIL WE DECIDE IT IS

 

JR_Rustler_III

πŸ‡°πŸ‡· Gookwaffen πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ– πŸ’»πŸ₯©
Destructive Ceremonious Master
Note: Bergoglio issued this Motu Proprio directly after returning from the hospital, where he had spent the last 10 days recovering from fairly serious surgery to have half his colon removed. The timing is rather interesting.

Yep--you read that right. Bergoglio had half his colon removed. Hmmmmmmm.

 

Brotaku

Well-known member
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺ️
Note: Bergoglio issued this Motu Proprio directly after returning from the hospital, where he had spent the last 10 days recovering from fairly serious surgery to have half his colon removed. The timing is rather interesting.

Yep--you read that right. Bergoglio had half his colon removed. Hmmmmmmm.

 

adolfschicklgruber

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
Not trying to hijack this thread as I respect the Catholics here, but men you need to consider Orthodoxy. I was a SSPX Latin mass catholic and this pope was the bright spotlight I needed to see the problems with the Catholic position. Im happy to discuss this more at length but seriously. I don’t know how anyone is still a serious Catholic after this shit.
 

Cousin Groypley

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
Your own popes pre council say the same about the Orthodox Church. If Francis is irrelevant then the papacy is irrelevant
Never said Francis was irrelevant. The Papacy is not irrelevant, it is ordained by Christ. Orthodox admitted that Rome is the first among the churches in the early councils. The solution for faithful Catholics should not be to become schismatics in rebellion against the Church, but to continue practicing our traditional liturgy in communion with Rome.
 

DaveA

Well-known member
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ–
So what's the new rule, that Mass may be conducted in any language *except* Latin?
 

OverMan

Ripper, tearer, slasher, gouger
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
I think, honestly, the world is ripe for a fire and brimstone Christian movement. Not the neutered, watered down big tent lie that is what people picture when they hear it, that's not how the world works and it is weak, and wreaks of loss and cowardice. I mean "Deus Vult, get the poles Vlad!!" type glorious Christianity.

Full disclosure, I don't know if Vlad was Christian, but he seems like it.

I'm not nor have ever been Catholic. This Pope, though. Oof. He makes me angry for Catholics.
 

Jozef_Tiso

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»
Not trying to hijack this thread as I respect the Catholics here, but men you need to consider Orthodoxy. I was a SSPX Latin mass catholic and this pope was the bright spotlight I needed to see the problems with the Catholic position. Im happy to discuss this more at length but seriously. I don’t know how anyone is still a serious Catholic after this shit.
I've been a fan of Jay Dyer for a number of years. He has a similar story. It is getting harder and harder for Trad (especially the SSPX) to circle the square when it comes to Rome. Francis has made the situation far worse. You will soon see these Marxist/Nellie Queen Bishops punish Priests/Parishes for the Latin Mass.
 

marcion

https://odysee.com/@RightBiblePodcast:0
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»
Well, I'm sure it's just another storm causing a few waves here and there.

It's not like it's symptomatic of a root problem that we can trace back to the Council of Jerusalem in 48 A.D. and which has only gotten progressively worse with the continued victories of the judaizers.

I predict you'll begin seeing priests wearing jewish prayer shawls during mass - no different from the Evangelicals. Bergoglio will endorse and praise these new vestments as being 'symbolic of unity with our (and I quote) 'older brothers.'

God was only revealed through Jesus Christ - not through the scribblings of a self-worshipping Satanic desert tribe. And the more the church - any church - fights that fundamental reality, the more destruction will befall them.

But don't take my word for it, look for yourself.
 

anti-barabas-ite

Work stuff through in your brain...UNVAXXED
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ– πŸ’»πŸ₯©πŸ₯ƒ
Escaped True Master
Destructive Ceremonious Master
God was only revealed through Jesus Christ - not through the scribblings of a self-worshipping Satanic desert tribe. And the more the church - any church - fights that fundamental reality, the more destruction will befall them.
I like how Peter esplains This in his latest podcast...
 

Jim Hansen

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
I am not exaggerating when I suggest this is huge. First, Bergoglio is directly contradicting Pope St. Pius V, who declared that the Missal of the Tridentine Rite, which we know today as the "traditional latin mass", was to be

"...freely and lawfully to be used, without any scruple of conscience or fear of incurring any penalty or censure…
No one whosoever is permitted to alter this notice of Our permission, statute, ordinance, command, precept, grant, indult, declaration, will, decree, and prohibition.
Should anyone dare to contravene it, let him know that he will incur the wrath of Almighty God and of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul.”


Bergoglio today has dared to contravene it. It sure sounds to me like Pope St. Pius V is putting Bergoglio on notice.

Second, Bergoglio is also directly contradicting his immediate predecessor (and true living Pope) Benedict XVI, who years ago issued his own Motu Proprio clarifying the results of Vatican II by declaring that any priest who desires to celebrate the Latin Mass is free to do so at any time, without needing to ask for permission from his superiors.

Here is the text of Bergoglio's Motu Proprio:



Taylor Marshall spoke about this in detail today. I haven't had the chance to listen to the entire thing yet, but here it is.


Ann Barnhardt, of course, has been going ham on this.



Remember: NOTHING IS OVER UNTIL WE DECIDE IT IS

What people have to understand is the real reasoning behind the intent to eliminate the Latin Mass. Latin is considered a "dead" language and thus it cannot be changed (it's not a "living" language that changes with the times). What this means is that the Luciferian Pope Francis can't issue edicts that make small but meaningful changes in various aspects of the Latin Mass - like what he has been doing with the "modern Catholic Mass" (the most recent was the slight change in the part of the Lord's Prayer).

One reason people love the Latin Mass (aside from many other positive attributes) is that it doesn't change and can't be changed. And this is against the agenda of the Luciferians who have worked to slowly change passages in the Bible (in some cases eliminated "Jesus Christ" from a specific reading).

So understand that the Luciferian Pope Francis is not just being an "assho__" (exercising power for ego) - he's working to eliminate fundamental aspects of Christianity in the Catholic Church. This is why he revoked his title, "Vicar of Christ" 6 or 8 months ago. He's slowing peeling away the layers that make the Catholic Church a Christian entity.

Regarding the Orthodox Church - the church you are drawn to should be something that inspires you and makes you feel closer to God. I'm a Catholic convert - and one reason was because the protestant churches were falling apart with their embracing of modernism. While the Catholic Church is going to undergo a schism and separation of the conservatives vs. the liberals, there will still remain a true conservative Catholic Church - even if it has to separate from the Luciferian Pope.

One of my family members has joined the Orthodox Church - and that's ok. The beliefs are similar and the fact that he remains a Christian is all that matters. Even in the Orthodox Church there are Luciferian elements - such as the Archbishop that recently said that anybody who doesn't take the Vaxx will be committing a mortal sin. Fortunately the Orthodox Church is not centralized so many other Orthodox clergy totally disagree with him and don't need to abide by his edicts. There are very knowledgeable (that understand the NWO and our reality of what's happening) clergy members in both the Catholic Church (Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, Cardinal Raymond Burke, etc.) and the Orthodox Church (Father Spyridon out of the UK - he's written an excellent book, that you can get on Amazon, titled "Orthodoxy and the Kingdom of Satan").
 

Highlander

Capernaum✝️Solar Eclipse✝️29 AD✝️Nov 24✝️
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ– πŸ’»
Last edited:

JR_Rustler_III

πŸ‡°πŸ‡· Gookwaffen πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ– πŸ’»πŸ₯©
Destructive Ceremonious Master
Not trying to hijack this thread as I respect the Catholics here, but men you need to consider Orthodoxy.
The Orthodox church has severe organizational problems. The Jews and the CIA are using the same divide-and-conquer tactics against the Orthodox that they used against the Protestants. Look at how the CIA just schismed the Russian and Ukrainian churches. Any church that is founded in schism ends in schism.

The Catholic Church's problems lie pretty much entirely in the Vatican. This antipope is manifesting the twin heresies of Modernism and Americanism and he will be rejected by the Church. The Church has dealt with plenty of antipopes in the past, and Bergoglio is just another antipope. Sooner or later he will either repent of his heresies (yes--other popes have promulgated heresies and repented after being confronted, it is a thing that happens), or he is going to be deposed.

Remember this precedent was set in the Church's earliest days. Paul confronted Peter (the first Pope) when Peter was in error, and Peter backed down.

Screen Shot 2021-07-17 at 10.55.06 AM.png
 
Last edited:

Jim Hansen

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
Sooner or later he will either repent of his heresies
He is never going to repent - he's fully onboard with the Luciferian agenda and he's supported by other high-level Luciferians in the Vatican (thus he will not be deposed / removed). As Archbishop Vigano said, Luciferian Pope Francis is expecting to have a major role in the NWO. We are in the Biblically-foretold end-game now.
 

Aquafina

Pit Viper Nationalism
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ– πŸ’»πŸ₯©
Destructive Ceremonious Master
Isn't the catholic church a roman empire larp? An attempt to unify the nations via religion?
 

Jim Hansen

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
Anything is possible. But, yeah.
I don't claim to have special knowledge - but I agree with everything that Archbishop Vigano has said (I believed these things before I read his missives / letters - it was gratifying to see Vigano confirm my observations).
 

JR_Rustler_III

πŸ‡°πŸ‡· Gookwaffen πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ– πŸ’»πŸ₯©
Destructive Ceremonious Master
Isn't the catholic church a roman empire larp? An attempt to unify the nations via religion?
That's empirically false. The Catholic Church has been around for 2000 years. If that was the plan, you would have seen it put into action long before now.
 

Jim Hansen

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
That's empirically false. The Catholic Church has been around for 2000 years. If that was the plan, you would have seen it put into action long before now.
Their mission would be driven by the words of Jesus Christ - go out and preach the Gospel to the ends of the Earth. So naturally any church that attempts to follow His commands would appear to be trying to unify the nations as Christians.
 
Top