Belgium: Flemish Catholic Bishops Start Blessing Faggot “Marriages”

Snake Baker

Guest
When the faggots get their hooks in, they just keep going.

The Pope is allowing this, by the way.

Daily Caller:

Flemish Roman Catholic bishops issued a document Tuesday allowing the church to hold blessing ceremonies for same-sex unions, in defiance of the Vatican’s ruling in March 2021.

The bishops of Flanders, the Flemish-speaking part of Belgium, posted the document titled, “Being pastorally close to homosexual persons — For a welcoming Church that excludes no one,” on the Bishops’ Conference of Belgium website, which suggests a ritual for same-sex unions, including prayers and Scripture readings in order for the couple to “express before God how they are committed to one another,” the Catholic News Agency reported.

The ritual would begin with prayers and a commitment between the couples and end with a “benediction,” the invocation of a blessing, Reuters reported.

The document also announced that each diocese will appoint a person to give “explicit attention to the situation of homosexual persons, their parents and families in the conduct of policy,” the Catholic News Agency reported.
Cardinal Jozef De Kesel and Dutch-speaking bishops in Belgium approve liturgy for blessings of same-sex couples. A big move given the Vatican’s doctrine office issued a ruling against same-sex blessings last year. Via @HendroM https://t.co/b07mKG2F5z

— Christopher Lamb (@ctrlamb) September 20, 2022

The new order defies the Vatican’s ruling in March 2021, in which it stated the Catholic Church cannot bless same-sex unions, as Catholic teaching holds that gay sex is “intrinsically disordered” and “contrary to the natural law.” The Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith responded to a question on whether the church can bless gay unions, saying, “Negative.” The Vatican further noted that God “does not and cannot bless sin.”

“The declaration of the unlawfulness of blessings of unions between persons of the same sex is not therefore, and is not intended to be, a form of unjust discrimination, but rather a reminder of the truth of the liturgical rite and of the very nature of the sacramentals, as the Church understands them,”
the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith said.

The Catholic Church has long affirmed that marriage is a sacrament between a man and a woman with the intention of procreating and educating new human life.

“The matrimonial covenant, by which a man and a woman establish between themselves a partnership of the whole of life, is by its nature ordered toward the good of the spouses and the procreation and education of offspring; this covenant between baptized persons has been raised by Christ the Lord to the dignity of a sacrament,” the Church teaching states, according to the Catholic Diocese of Dallas’ website.

Pope Francis appeared to support a civil union law for same-sex couples in the October 2020 documentary, “Francesco,” created by the gay, Russian-born director Evgeny Afineevsky. The statements came from a 2019 interview with Mexican journalist Valentina Alazraki.
Afineevsky just happens to be a Jew.

The Pope is totally out of control, and the Daily Stormer is officially calling on him to resign.

Continue reading...
 

Wigless

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿
For a welcoming Church that excludes no one.
It's obvious that the way two separate ideas are deliberately conflated in these sorts of claims demonstrates how thoroughly the Catholic church has been taken over by its greatest ally.

As other forum writers have said before, the open hearted idea of excluding no one meant the church inadvertently brought in people actively opposed to its interests. Once they were in positions of influence they obfuscated the difference between sin and sinner.

It's depressing to see that the majority of the congregation evidently can't tell that they're meant to welcome the sinner but not the sin. What's so difficult to understand about that?

Some robust action in a few dioceses might go some way to reversing this trend. The Cardinal and bishops should be tarred and feathered then run out of town with unlubricated dildos jamming their cassocks up their arses.
 
Last edited:

GoodOlboY

Hard R Espouser
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖 💻
It's obvious that the way two separate ideas are deliberately conflated in these sorts of claims demonstrates how thoroughly the Catholic church has been taken over by its greatest ally.

As other forum writers have said before, the generous idea of excluding no one meant the church inadvertently brought in people actively opposed to its interests. Once they were in positions of influence the difference between sin and sinner was obfuscated.

It's depressing to see that the majority of the congregation evidently can't tell that they're meant to welcome the sinner but not the sin. What's so difficult to understand about that?

Some robust action in a few dioceses might go some way to reversing this trend. The Cardinal and bishops should be tarred and feathered then run out of town with unlubricated dildos jamming their cassocks up their arses.
Yes, the false teaching promulgated here is the Church is open to everyone. It is not for everyone. It's only open to those who want to come to Christ.

This error is the logical conclusion of the Modernist's push to make the Church "more appealing" to non-Catholics (the stated goal of Vatican II) because of failing attendence. In fact, the lagging Church attendence had nothing to do with "not keeping up with the times". It had everything to do with the rising influence of the Jews. If instead of doing Vatican II, the Church instead fought a war of subterfuge through media and movie companies, government, and education we would be living in a much different world.
 
Last edited:

JR_Rustler_III

🇰🇷 Gookwaffen 🇯🇵
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖 💻🥩
Destructive Ceremonious Master
The Pope is allowing this, by the way.
Yes. Bergoglio made a statement affirming the Church's traditional opposition to sodomite marriage in March 2021 in order to spoof the pro-Bergoglio Tradcaths, but now he refuses to discipline any bishops that defy 2000 years of Catholic scripture and tradition.

Meanwhile, Traditional Latin Mass enthusiasts continue to get persecuted by the sodomites in the Vatican.
 

CharlesWorthing

Unsolicited advice giver
Old World Underground
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖
The Flemish were, supposedly, the based half of Belgians.
All of their attention is focused on screwing over the walloons. Do you remember the drama over the ring road around Brussels? It that takes a wide detour so it takes in equal flemmish and walloon territory. I knew a flemmish MP in their parliament. He loved it when I said I insisted on ordering in Dutch when I visited Brussels restaurants. They probably spat in my food.

The deep state pedophile network was on show in Belgium in the mid to late 1990s with the Dutroux case. He raped some little girls and left them to starve. He was so well connected the cops let him escape first tine he was arrested. There were huge public marches against the regime.

Belgium is just like Austria for people minding their own business. People seem to appreciate you for keeping to yourself. So a lot of shit can go on underground.



The Dutroux affair was huge news in Belgium where 350,000 people took to the streets to protest the handling of the case involving an elite pedophile ring.

The ring had links with the establishment and royalty. The case has been linked to abuse at Château des Amerois

Background
Suspicion began in multiple young girls began disappearing around the area of Bertrix, Belgium. Young girls had been disappearing in this area for a couple of years but local police were unable to develop any solid leads. A breakthrough came when a suspicious white van was reported, and the police were able to trace it to Marc Dutroux, a known pedophile.

Though unemployed and receiving welfare from the state, he owned seven homes and enjoyed a lavish lifestyle paid for by selling children and child porn. Girls as young as 8 reportedly starved to death in a makeshift dungeon in his basement, after months of sexual abuse.

The Cover-up
What scandalized the Belgium people was not simply the abuse, but rather the systematic cover-up.

  • Police had investigated Dutroux multiple times without any arrests.
  • Police entered his home and saw a makeshift dungeon in which two girls were being starved inside.
  • Police ignored a tip from an informant, who said that Dutroux offered him between 3,000 and 5,000 dollars to kidnap young girls.
  • Police had in their possession a video tape of Dutroux constructing the makeshift dungeon in one of his basement.
  • The lead prosecutor, Jean-Marc Conorrette, was fired from the case. He would later allege he received multiple death threats.1
Protection of the Elite
A well-regarded children’s activist, Marie France Botte, claimed that the new prosecutors were sitting on a politically sensitive list of high-profile customers of Dutrouxs thousands of video tapes.2

Marc Verwilghen, the Flemish parliamentarian who led the inquiry into Dutroux, claimed that many in the Belgian establishment, including heads of government, refused to cooperate, and sought to stifle and ridicule his report. He claimed that magistrates and police were officially told to not answer certain questions, in what he described as a ‘characteristic smothering operation.’

He was further quoted as saying ‘For me, the Dutroux affair is a question of organized crime.’

Involvement of Elite in Abuse
A parliamentary panel revealed the names of 30 government officials it said were complicit in the hiding of Dutrouxs misdeeds, none have been punished.

One of the victims, Regina Louf, came forward with details about Belgium’s child abuse networks and those involved. She named many of the members of this elite ring, including senior judges, one of the country’s most powerful politicians – now dead – and an influential banker were included. To quote a BBC article:

“The sessions not only involved sex, they included sadism, torture and murder; and again, she described in detail, the place, the victims and how they were killed.”3
She corroborated that one of Dutrouxs associates, Jean-Michel Nihoul, was instrumental in the abuse parties.

“At these parties Nihoul was a sort of party beast while Dutroux was more on the side.”3
Nihoul had significant connections among Belgian political and financial elite. He confessed to organizing an orgy at a Belgian chateau attended by government officials. It emerged that Dutroux and Nihoul were part of a long distance child trafficking ring that imported children from Slovakia4.

Satanic Aspect
Abrasax
The Dutroux victims attested to horrific abuse: raped by dogs and snakes, and being forced to witness the murders of other children. The abuse seemed to centre around a group called “Abrasax”.

Police in August 1996 found a note at the home of Bernard Weinstein, an accomplice who Dutroux has admitted murdering, which led them to investigate the “Abrasax” organization led by “high priestess” Dominique Kindermans.

Nothing was found of significance in a police raid of the premises of Abrasax. The priestess Nahema-Nephthys (Dominique Kinderman) and priest Anubis (Francis Desmet) freely admitted their interest in black magic but denied any illegality.

The police were criticised for their “satanic panic” and the black magic/ritual murder hypotheses were suppressed soon after, and never emerged again.

Armand Van Ghyseghem
MAny witnesses spoke to police about Armand van Ghyseghem, a businessman based in Belgium.

What follows are points extracted from three police interviews concerning

  • Van Ghyseghem claimed he regularly abused girls who were locked in iron cages.5
  • Van Ghyseghem is friends with the priest & priestess of Abrasax.5
  • A man died in a black mass at Abasax.56
  • Van Ghyseghem was protected by Charles PICQUE, a notable Belgian politician.5
  • Van Ghyseghem cult name is Aba Vangh.5
  • Children were brought by their parents and took communion in the name of Satan.7
  • Van Ghysegham bragged of his paedophilia in Asia7
Much information concerning this gentleman has been scrubbed from the internet and searches for his name are blocked under EU law.

Notes
The dossier about the abuse, including the police interviews, was published by wikileaks and available here
 
Last edited:

Wigless

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿
If instead of doing Vatican II, the Church instead fought a war of subterfuge through media and movie companies, government, and education we would be living in a much different world
With its untold wealth the Church could've easily afforded to influence media and movie companies and education.

Some people might feel that it didn't because its an old institution rooted in the past and therefore not up to speed with modern propoganda techniques. Of course that's nonsense as demonstrated by the fact that the Vatican is bristling with satellite dishes and antenna that keep its denizens in touch with the Church's investments and stock markets around the world.

A little less saving for a rainy day and more saving souls would have helped the people it was put on earth to serve in an unfathomable number of ways.
 

Benevolent Landlord

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
With its untold wealth the Church could've easily afforded to influence media and movie companies and education.
The Church does not have "untold wealth" and it never did. All the money it takes in goes toward building churches (not so much these days, but historically), parish upkeep, salaries, and charity. The Catholic Church is the most charitable organization in the history of the world. The Vatican isn't sitting on an ever increasing hoard of money, in fact it loses millions every year.
 

GoodOlboY

Hard R Espouser
👑
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻🥓💻⛪️🍖 💻
Some people might feel that it didn't because its an old institution rooted in the past and therefore not up to speed with modern propoganda techniques. Of course that's nonsense as demonstrated by the fact that the Vatican is bristling with satellite dishes and antenna that keep its denizens in touch with the Church's investments and stock markets around the world.
Correct. The Church already recognized a war happening internally as early as the late 19th Century. The enemy had more than 50 years operating behind enemy lines before 1964.

 

ItsAlwaysSomething

Well-known member
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒🏋🏻
Escaped True Master
Such is the fruit of mommy worship. I don't know how any of you defend this or Orthodoxy after their full endorsements of the coof hoax regardless of that doctrine. These are clearly guiding people into the hands of the impending antichrist. Jesus structured his earthly ministry like a guerilla army. Decentralized and thus impossible for the gates of Hell to overcome (which God controls, not Satan). Separating the wheat from the tares. The only time that Christ's church shall be central is when Jesus takes the earthly throne for the 1000 year reign.

Cathodoxy is the spiritual equivalent of an American city. Repent and get out now. An Illuminati carny like Shia Lebeouf endorsing it should have been enough of a red flag if the others weren't enough.
 

Wigless

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿
The Church does not have "untold wealth" and it never did. All the money it takes in goes toward building churches (not so much these days, but historically), parish upkeep, salaries, and charity. The Catholic Church is the most charitable organization in the history of the world. The Vatican isn't sitting on an ever increasing hoard of money, in fact it loses millions every year.
I mean untold wealth in the literal sense, as in 'not told', as in no one (bar a very select few) would know its wealth because the Church is a charitable organisation.

I accept that the irritation I displayed in my writing gave the wrong impression that I think everyone in the Vatican lives atop a pile of gold coins rubbing their hands in glee.

That said, my main point was that the Church is well versed in methods of disseminating messages, yet it chooses to do so quietly via Catholic schools and Catholic churches. Rather than the present passive approach of watching Christendom slowly wither away, and compounding that by misguidedly by promoting insane social messaging to appeal to more people, I would prefer a more active approach targeting areas of society that can compound the original message.

Soros, bless his heart, understands this perfectly and targets his shekels where they can do the most damage. He doesn't need to take over an entire city council, just the DA and mayor, to have the most effect. The Catholic Church seems to do the opposite and funds entire schools, when it really only needs to fund the principal and HR manager in order to effect change.

I've given a simplistic analogy but I hope it better conveys what I meant.
 

Benevolent Landlord

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
⏰☕🚬🚽🚿🪒
I mean untold wealth in the literal sense, as in 'not told', as in no one (bar a very select few) would know its wealth because the Church is a charitable organisation.

I accept that the irritation I displayed in my writing gave the wrong impression that I think everyone in the Vatican lives atop a pile of gold coins rubbing their hands in glee.

That said, my main point was that the Church is well versed in methods of disseminating messages, yet it chooses to do so quietly via Catholic schools and Catholic churches. Rather than the present passive approach of watching Christendom slowly wither away, and compounding that by misguidedly by promoting insane social messaging to appeal to more people, I would prefer a more active approach targeting areas of society that can compound the original message.

Soros, bless his heart, understands this perfectly and targets his shekels where they can do the most damage. He doesn't need to take over an entire city council, just the DA and mayor, to have the most effect. The Catholic Church seems to do the opposite and funds entire schools, when it really only needs to fund the principal and HR manager in order to effect change.

I've given a simplistic analogy but I hope it better conveys what I meant.
Yes, well, the Church was infiltrated. The modernists want this. Francis has publicly denounced the blessing of gay "unions," but afaik hasn't taken any action against the clergy doing them. Meanwhile he's going after traditional Catholics and orthodox priests who just want the Latin Mass. Despite this, traditional (true) Catholicism is growing and one of the chief complaints of the modernists is how orthodox the younger priests are. Things will probably get worse before they get better, but they will get better because the gates of Hell shall not prevail.

 
Last edited:
Top