Archbishop of Canterbury Demands Destruction of “White Jesus”

A

Andrew Anglin

Guest


You’ll be shocked to hear that this man is part Jew.

CNN:

Justin Welby, the Archbishop of Canterbury and head of the Church of England, has said the church should reconsider its portrayal of Jesus as a White man.

Speaking to the BBC Today Programme, Welby was asked whether the way the western church “portrays Jesus” needed to be “thought about again” and “re-imagined” in light of recent Black Lives Matter protests following the death of George Floyd.

“Yes, of course it does,” he said, adding that Jesus was portrayed differently in countries around the world. He was regularly in touch with Anglican Church leaders from around the world, he said, who did not portray Jesus as White.

“You go into their churches and you don’t see a White Jesus — you see a Black Jesus, or Chinese Jesus, or a Middle Eastern Jesus — which is of course the most accurate.

“You see a Fijian Jesus — you see Jesus portrayed in as many ways as there are cultures, languages and understandings.”

Welby added that the representations of Jesus were not, however, “who we worship” but rather served as a “reminder of the universality of the God who became fully human.”
This is all a bunch of revisionist crap.

Absolute garbage.

It’s an attempt to attack and destroy history.

The fact of reality is that Jesus, like virtually everyone in the Middle East at the time, was white.

Look at a map of the Greek Empire at the time of Alexander – the whole area was WHITE PEOPLE, until they reached India.



The reason that people in the Middle East are “Middle Eastern” race now is primarily a result of Islam. The Moslems were breeding a war machine, so they were willing to use the wombs of any women they could find, and a lot of those were black wombs that they found in the area of Yemen and in Africa.

Then, the Mongols came through and joined Islam.

There is no actual “Middle Eastern race” – what we are calling that now is simply a mix of white, black and Asian.



All the people in the Old Testament were white. We know now that the Egyptians were white – we have the mummies. They have red hair and beards. Over 4,000 years ago, the people in Egypt were white.

The tribes of Israel were also white. Modern Jews, like the Arabs, are just mixed race bastards with little relation to the Israelites of the Bible.

Imagine if we let the US fall to these hordes of brown people, and then they started saying that Thomas Jefferson was black and George Washington was a Mexican. That’s the equivalent of what we do with the Bible. No one has any reason to believe these people were “Middle Eastern race,” they just make that assumption based on the fact that that’s who’s there now.

All evidence and historical record however shows that every hero of the Bible, including Jesus, was white.

Christianity is a European religion, it is the religion of European people, Jesus was a European, the Old Testament is about Europeans. Fact.



I don’t care if black people or Asians or whoever want to make their own images of Christ. That is okay, if it helps their faith by making Him more relatable. He is supposed to be relatable. But the fact is: our image of Christ is the accurate one, showing his true identity, as described in ancient texts.

But the facts don’t matter. This is an attack on all of our institutions, and of course they are attempting to destroy religious icons.

Surely, “we have to destroy images of Christ because of George Floyd” is the point at which this has gone too far?

Continue reading...
 

Im the horse

Well-known member
So all of the non whites can have their non white versions of Jesus, but whites can’t have a white Jesus, according to this douchebag?

I say the exact same thing ALL OF THE FUCKING TIME. If our demographics here in the US have gone from like 90% white to what, 60% in less than 50 years (and still dropping fast), I’m supposed to believe that the Middle East has stayed brown for over 3000 years? Uh huh. Like blacks and browns have ever in the history of the world, created complex civilizations with detailed written history and lavish buildings. This guy may be part Jew but he’s 100% a faggot cuck. I’m just so tired of these people endlessly demanding we destroy our heritage and culture, it’s insanity and tiresome and infuriating. When is it enough?
 

Harkon Ripsplitter

Uses Scalps as Cumsockets
Mummies have red hair because of the iron oxide content in their isolated tomb enviorment dyes them that way.

The jewish sect of christianity already worships the outsider who was trialed and executed as a criminal.
America was prepeared for the cult of George Flyod since The Green Mile. If they would turn it into an actual church it would be less weird than other domestic american religions like mormonism or scientology.

Anyway i support the destruction of the church the way the church destroyed itself the history of conquered peoples.

 

yeetyaw

New member
“If we achieved a Fascist future for White countries, these disagreements about religious doctrine would remain, but all of the various lines of thinking would be respected, and none of us would feel like anyone was pressing down on us.

Those who follow Christian Identity would have their churches, those who follow other forms of Christianity would have their churches, and those who don’t like to attend church wouldn’t attend church. We would all live in a Judenfrei, European society, liberated from the filth, both physical and ideological, which has ripped our civilization apart.

This all having been said, the site will continue to have a pro-Christian tone. We will continue to defend against the attacks on Christianity and Christian civilization, in all of their forms. All that will stop appearing are articles going into specific details about religious doctrine.“

-Andrew Anglin, No More Christianity Debates on the Daily Stormer, June 11, 2014

What made you change your mind by endorsing Christian Identity in this piece? I look forward to future articles making the case for this doctrine, best wishes!
 

MechaPregnantAnneFrank

I bully nerds in the name of Jesus Christ
Old World Underground
This is what a North African looked like roughly 3 centuries after the resurrection.



Augustine of Hippo, also known as Saint Augustine, was a theologian, philosopher, and the bishop of Hippo Regius in Numidia, Roman North Africa. Wikipedia
Born: November 13, 354 AD, Thagaste
Died: August 28, 430 AD, Ruines d'Hippone (Hippo Regius), Annaba, Algeria

Full name: Aurelius Augustinus Hipponensis
Looks huwhite to me!

 

Andrew Anglin

🐁 🎀 𝓂𝒶𝓈𝓉𝑒𝓇 𝒸𝒽𝒾𝑒𝒻 🎀 🐁
Old World Underground
Does anybody know of any good resources breaking down the old testament in this racial context?
Not really.

The Christian Identity stuff is absolutely poisonous garbage, they just teach Talmudic Judaism.

But basically, there isn't any assumption that the people in the Bible were anything other than white until the modern period. So anything written before that is going to be written under the assumption that everyone in the Bible was white.

Even now, no one will really argue with you if you lay out the timeframe, and the fact that literally everyone in the region was white at the time and assuming the Israelites weren't white is literally based on nothing.
 

Andrew Anglin

🐁 🎀 𝓂𝒶𝓈𝓉𝑒𝓇 𝒸𝒽𝒾𝑒𝒻 🎀 🐁
Old World Underground
What made you change your mind by endorsing Christian Identity in this piece? I look forward to future articles making the case for this doctrine, best wishes!
I do not and never will endorse that garbage and furthermore, I think it's evil and run by the feds.

The fact that the Israelites, as a matter of historical fact, were white does not mean "so let's do Talmudic Judaism."

Every single CI cultist preaches the Talmud. The cult itself is just Talmudism. They don't really even deny it.

What they do is make it so no one like me can say this historical fact without being accused of being in that cult.
 

MechaPregnantAnneFrank

I bully nerds in the name of Jesus Christ
Old World Underground
Not really.

The Christian Identity stuff is absolutely poisonous garbage, they just teach Talmudic Judaism.

But basically, there isn't any assumption that the people in the Bible were anything other than white until the modern period. So anything written before that is going to be written under the assumption that everyone in the Bible was white.

Even now, no one will really argue with you if you lay out the timeframe, and the fact that literally everyone in the region was white at the time and assuming the Israelites weren't white is literally based on nothing.
Exactly.
You don't have to do weird interpretations of the text and get into WE WUZZING. Literally just take scripture as is.
 

Andrew Anglin

🐁 🎀 𝓂𝒶𝓈𝓉𝑒𝓇 𝒸𝒽𝒾𝑒𝒻 🎀 🐁
Old World Underground
Yes I know of many and I will be posting these in a reply here shortly. There is so much evidence backing up what Anglin is saying it is truly unbelievable. Standby my fine friend.
If you post a bunch of CI shit and act like it has something to do with me, I'm going to delete it and ban you.

I do not want anything at all to do with CI.
 

Asher

Member
OK just a quick introduction. Firstly I am giddy just being here, I am so happy this forum exists in its present form. I am a gamer as well, work in the biz and look forward to contributing my own thoughts (was just thinking of downloading Fallout 76 LOL) Anglin, love the articles, I truly do not know how you do it! You're a machine, keep up the great work, I will be supporting. I am so glad you finally touched on this subject, I know it is a thorny and touchy one but I'm glad you dared to go where few men venture. It is your style, and it is what makes your thinking/writing/etc so damn good. Not trying to blow smoke up your ass, I just give credit where its due. I think this whole topic needs to be reset for zoomers, and I will give one golden nugget here for all to take home and share with the fam. Josephus, the ancient historian actually recorded physically what David looked like. He used the word Xanthos specifically, look up that Greek word it means blonde, it is the only word for blonde. Joe is one of the most trusted historical sources of this time.

So... one more nugget of gold you say? In the second book of Maccabees there is a bit of correspondence recorded between the elders in Jerusalem at the time and the king of Laodiea (essentially the Greeks) and in this letter writing back and forth they refereed to one and other as blood related, both sides stated this, and it is not only recorded in this apocryphal book but also Joe records the same. Why on earth do you think so much of the New Testament writings, damn near all of it, was Greek-centric? Most of Paul's letters where written to Greek city states, that is just fact. If you don't like it because some Catholic priest diddled you when you were a kid and now you have some serious axe to grind regarding Xanity then that is your problem, get over it, stop blaming all such buggery and tom foolery on God. Its not his fault.

These are just facts, Anglin is right to try and reclaim our heritage, God knows these bastards are dismantling it piece by piece every day. And now, because this is a gamer site as well, let me relay this - I recently got into the game Assassins Creed: Odysseys, all the Spartans and Athenians are portrayed as swarthy peasants, i.e. dark skined. It is really annoying, I had to spend about 4 hours modding the game so I could play it as a truly historical Greek, light skin blonde hair and all. Check out Asha Logos (not me) youtube videos on the Greeks, nice work that fine lad is doing. Once you realize the Greeks were white and that it is super easy to connect them with our great and glorious God, then the path is easy and the way clear. The Assyrian tablets also directly link up the two people as well, quite conveniently.

There is one point though that I would like to kindly and respectfully disagree with Anglin on and it is this. For blacks, browns or whatever to steal our Christ and change him into their own image, well I believe that is blasphemy. They have their own gods why do they have to muck up ours? Again Christianity spread first and foremost to the whites in the regions of Athens, Sparta and Greece and that was the fountain from which of European western civilization sprang. We are the ones who took (perhaps a half cocked idea) the banner of the Cross into darkest parts of world. The whole Bible and God's mission was to one people, Christ his son was called only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, now to take the kings meat that was prepared for his children and give it to another, well that is just wrong on a certain level. Jesus told a non-Israelite woman this same thing, though he also healed her daughter showing his great compassion. Furthermore the church has failed massively, leading the blind into thinking that they are gentles when the word simply means nations when you look it up in Greek or Hebrew, it can refer to either Israel nations, non Israel nations or both, check out Ted Weilands wrtings on the subject. He covers it very well in book Israel: Yesterday, Today and Forever and also in Mysteries of the Gentles... so can we all please stop calling eachother goy? Its about as stupid and niggers calling eachother niggers. We're better than that :)
 

AmericanHero

America First
Old World Underground
Do we have any good references historically to make this point aside from art work and general history?

By that I mean people in Church history making a racial distinction between Whites and Jews/Turks/Arabs whatever. Or much reference to Whites losing control over the Middle East? Or Jews being White?

At the moment I take the basic Jesus was a Jew and Jews are distinct from Whites approach. But I might just be undereducated on the subject.

Luther originally in his "Jesus was a Jew" book takes that stance. Before failing to convert any Jews with the Gospel and going full On the Jews and their Lies later in his life.

If I had been a Jew and had seen such dolts and blockheads govern and teach the Christian faith, I would sooner have become a hog than a Christian. They have dealt with the Jews as if they were dogs rather than human beings; they have done little else than deride them and seize their property. When they baptize them they show them nothing of Christian doctrine or life, but only subject them to popishness and mockery...If the apostles, who also were Jews, had dealt with us Gentiles as we Gentiles deal with the Jews, there would never have been a Christian among the Gentiles ... When we are inclined to boast of our position [as Christians] we should remember that we are but Gentiles, while the Jews are of the lineage of Christ. We are aliens and in-laws; they are blood relatives, cousins, and brothers of our Lord. Therefore, if one is to boast of flesh and blood the Jews are actually nearer to Christ than we are...If we really want to help them, we must be guided in our dealings with them not by papal law but by the law of Christian love. We must receive them cordially, and permit them to trade and work with us, that they may have occasion and opportunity to associate with us, hear our Christian teaching, and witness our Christian life. If some of them should prove stiff-necked, what of it? After all, we ourselves are not all good Christians either.[4]

Fun Luther fact... The last 10 years or so of his life were primarily spent speaking about the Evils of Jews and it was the subject of his last sermon.
 

Brahms

New member
Both the old and New Testament are gibberish - people really think we can use that nonsense to form something meaningful and go forward into the future? Compare the words of Marcus Aurelius to the New Testament (both were written around the same time supposedly) - one makes sense, the other is gibberish made to sound important to illiterate people’s ears. Why is that? We spent the next two thousand years trying make this nonsense make sense - that’s the Catholic Church in its entirety.
 

Lassitor

Well-known member
Old World Underground
During my 'Buddhist Years' there was always a debate about what race the historical Siddhartha Buddha came from. The Buddhist Canon says he was from the Shakya Clan that migrated to Northern India from Greece, so he was white.

The White Siddhartha was accepted as fact for 2500 years, until the Jews started meddling with Buddhism and now suggesting that Siddhartha was actually brown, if not black skin.

The revisionist crap that is happening in western Christianity is happening in Western Buddhism (THANKS JEWS!)

As always, BEWARE OF THE JEW.
 

Bogus Juan

Well-known member
Old World Underground
Even Muhammad was recorded to have ivory skin, though it was also said to be abnormal and beautiful.

Though he was from a port town without a lineage that traces back so I suppose they could say he was some European sailor’s bastard child while everyone else was brown.
 

yeetyaw

New member
It was indeed presumptuous of me to accuse you of “endorsing CI,” my apologies. Though, not all CI adherents are created equal. I’m not by any means an expert on this cult, but I do know that some believers reject at least one of the Talmudic doctrines that are often promoted in those circles, namely, the belief that Eve had sexual relations with the Serpent. It would not surprise me one bit to find out that the Jews infiltrated that movement and started inserting all of this weirdo shit into it just to make it as repulsive to normal people as possible, and what better weirdo shit to poison the well with than something of which they are already familiar, their own Talmud! But all CI followers have one thing in common, and that is the idea that Europeans are the Israelites of the Bible and the Jews are imposters. That’s all that I meant when I foolishly designated your article as “endorsing CI.”
 

Asher

Member
Do we have any good references historically to make this point aside from art work and general history?
AmericanHero, That is a good question and one I have really only begun to look into. I do know that the earlier American settlers, pilgrims etc, referred to themselves as Israel in their writings. Same with our founding fathers, so there is that. Specific references, it may be best for you to just search those up rather than I data dump here. Also the Scottish Declaration of Independence along with a couple of older Dutch books and monuments state the same. Curious if you read my post above?

Also monarchies of Europe the church fathers more or less alluded to such things. There are some pretty heafty books written in detail on the subject I think from around 17 and 18 hundreds. I believe Luther was, as were many in times past, somewhat confused on the subject. We like to romantically think they knew it all but this was just simply not the case. Everything really came to a head with Speilberg's Prince of Egypt, prior to that folks didn't think about it much and the truth is the memories of peoples thought time and space with regards to origins ect can become faded.
 

Asher

Member
Not sure if this is helpful to anyone but the BBC had an article a little while back that demonstrated quite clearly that the DNA of Israeli "Jews" and Arabs were strikingly similar.
 

Asher

Member
Both the old and New Testament are gibberish - people really think we can use that nonsense to form something meaningful and go forward into the future? Compare the words of Marcus Aurelius to the New Testament (both were written around the same time supposedly) - one makes sense, the other is gibberish made to sound important to illiterate people’s ears. Why is that? We spent the next two thousand years trying make this nonsense make sense - that’s the Catholic Church in its entirety.
I think many people throw the child out with the bath water, I get that the church has done a horrible job, I also do not deny that most people who believe this is a religion of the "Jews" must want to run away from it as far as possible, why wouldn't you, I would too. I get it. But would it not perhaps make more sense that the "Jews" who only lie and steal, would steal this as well? They are our long standing enemy throughout time. And reagring the NT whatever you think of it, no book has had more or a lasting impact and effect on Western Civ than it has, nothing comes close, so certinaly there is something to it rather than gibberish. Think about it, if it is all just gibberish, what does that say about us, the men of the West? Also I always ask folks, since we went to the moon and invented just about everything, why would we be a people that would need to borrow someone else's "religion"? (see my lengthy reply above for more)
 

Andrew Anglin

🐁 🎀 𝓂𝒶𝓈𝓉𝑒𝓇 𝒸𝒽𝒾𝑒𝒻 🎀 🐁
Old World Underground
Do we have any good references historically to make this point aside from art work and general history?
Well, yes. The Bible repeatedly refers to people in it as white and pink skinned. Goliath hated David because he was so pale. Which is something we may be familiar with.

General history is more than enough, as there is no evidence in the other direction, so it should be assumed that the fact that everyone in the region was white would mean that the Israelites were too.

Modern Jews are mixed from after the time of Christ. Even still, Ashkenazis have 70% European DNA.

What is the evidence that the people in the Bible were some kind of brown group surrounded by European people? It makes no sense. It is purely a modern theory based on modern racial demographics of the area, which as I said, are a result of Islam and the Mongol invasion.
 

Andrew Anglin

🐁 🎀 𝓂𝒶𝓈𝓉𝑒𝓇 𝒸𝒽𝒾𝑒𝒻 🎀 🐁
Old World Underground
It was indeed presumptuous of me to accuse you of “endorsing CI,” my apologies. Though, not all CI adherents are created equal. I’m not by any means an expert on this cult, but I do know that some believers reject at least one of the Talmudic doctrines that are often promoted in those circles, namely, the belief that Eve had sexual relations with the Serpent. It would not surprise me one bit to find out that the Jews infiltrated that movement and started inserting all of this weirdo shit into it just to make it as repulsive to normal people as possible, and what better weirdo shit to poison the well with than something of which they are already familiar, their own Talmud! But all CI followers have one thing in common, and that is the idea that Europeans are the Israelites of the Bible and the Jews are imposters. That’s all that I meant when I foolishly designated your article as “endorsing CI.”
Other than a few notable exceptions, virtually everyone from this cult that I've come into contact with has acted like a literal Jew. They're some of the worst people I have ever interacted with in my life. They are deceitful and vindictive scum, on the whole.

I've stopped interacting with anyone involved in it a long time ago, and I am certainly not about to start now.

You don't have to look at the Jews for having infiltrated it, it's been a fed operation throughout its history.
 
Top