Andrew Anglin's conversion to Christianity

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
That's exactly what I've been saying here. The bible is extremely clear the apocalypse is the end of 2nd temple Jerusalem. The mental gymnastics employed to read yourself into fulfilled eschatology is jaw-dropping.
we must learn patients and acquire the skills necessary to make what is true known if it is
 

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
for at that time there will be great tribulation, such as has not been since the beginning of the world until now, nor ever will be.
- Matthew 24:21

It doesn't seem like something that we would miss/overlook...
I think it would be very unwise to be totally certain of this in such times. As the title deems it, I have taken it upon myself to inquire of the possibility that anything was in-fact overlooked. Your state of becoming is important to the alliance
Pope Card.jpg
 

Flash McQueen

America First
Old World Underground
What does Jesus say about this sack of Jerusalem by the Romans in 70AD?

Matthew 24:21 β–Ί
For then there will be great distress, unequaled from the beginning of the world until now--and never to be equaled again.



So the destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD was "The Final Tribulation". There is no way you can claim future eschatological expectation in light of this. You're putting your emotion into it instead of reason. There is no way we can interpret 2000 year old dead languages emotionally, this is the work of real scholarship.
You're an idiot.

And Biblically illiterate.

It doesn't matter how many times you copy-pasta the same small handful of cherry-picked verses and quotes from preterist cult websites to make your ridiculous arguments, while ignoring the rest of the Bible -- the Christians here are going to keep laughing at you.

Because we've actually read the Bible -- and you haven't.

And, any parts of the Bible that you did happen to read, you obviously didn't comprehend.

Which is understandable -- because you're not a Christian.

But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

-- 1 Corinthians 2:14
 

Flash McQueen

America First
Old World Underground
That's exactly what I've been saying here...
lol -- The most damning indictment of your ridiculous preterist eschatology is that the only comments you agree with in this thread are the deranged musings of a known schizophrenic who is obviously taking extremely high doses of mind-altering prescription medication.

Notsure Brush.png

I guess we have two village-idiots now.
 
Last edited:

Bernamej

French Antisemitic Cartoonist
I went through all the trouble to reasonably and academically rebut his "Christianity is a jewish lie" bullshit, I sure hope he has a reply for me :(
Anyway you could forward it to me ? It must have escaped me and I’m too dead tired to go through the whole thread again...
 

Andrew Anglin

🐁 πŸŽ€ π“‚π’Άπ“ˆπ“‰π‘’π“‡ 𝒸𝒽𝒾𝑒𝒻 πŸŽ€ 🐁
Staff member
Old World Underground
You know, what's particularly interesting to me is the lengths the apparent anti-christianists go to evade and downplay any actual position. While I also believe it's true that the best defense is a good offense, it seems to me that in this case, it is pure deflection. Inherent in the soul of any non-Christian western man is going to be a massive amount of cognitive dissonance and spiritual denial which the soul is not going to be able to deal with in any healthy manner. Every man has to come to terms with their inherent human need of spirituality in some form, and the western man who attempts to do this with "I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE", attempting to emulate some kind of faggoty California-style Buddhism, or embracing the Dawkins style religion of atheism, will eventually crash into the fact that it just doesn't fucking work. Somehow or some way, they have to confront their own bitterness and denial of their birthright, and it usually leads to an existential crisis. It's among the saddest things I've ever seen; look at Richard Spencer. He is a broken shell of a thing who was unable to come to terms with himself or his beliefs. Hell, look at any of his supporters, you will find broken people who have no real conviction and no real beliefs about..well...anything at all. To Spencer, Enoch and his ilk, religion is a tool and a superficial thing because they've been utterly and completely blinded by their own hubris. They simply don't understand the role of God in their lives. Frankly, as loathesome as they are, I pity them.
I agree but

depositphotos_63991491-stock-photo-press-enter-key.jpg
 

Johnny_Doe

Active member
I'll edit it for thee. I am not shy about using the "enter" key.


You know, what's particularly interesting to me is the lengths the apparent anti-christianists go to evade and downplay any actual position.

While I also believe it's true that the best defense is a good offense, it seems to me that in this case, it is pure deflection.

Inherent in the soul of any non-Christian western man is going to be a massive amount of cognitive dissonance and spiritual denial which the soul is not going to be able to deal with in any healthy manner.

Every man has to come to terms with their inherent human need of spirituality in some form, and the western man who attempts to do this with "I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE", attempting to emulate some kind of faggoty California-style Buddhism, or embracing the Dawkins style religion of atheism, will eventually crash into the fact that it just doesn't fucking work.

Somehow or some way, they have to confront their own bitterness and denial of their birthright, and it usually leads to an existential crisis. It's among the saddest things I've ever seen; look at Richard Spencer. He is a broken shell of a thing who was unable to come to terms with himself or his beliefs.

Hell, look at any of his supporters, you will find broken people who have no real conviction and no real beliefs about..well...anything at all. To Spencer, Enoch and his ilk, religion is a tool and a superficial thing because they've been utterly and completely blinded by their own hubris. They simply don't understand the role of God in their lives. Frankly, as loathesome as they are, I pity them.
 

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
I'll edit it for thee. I am not shy about using the "enter" key.


You know, what's particularly interesting to me is the lengths the apparent anti-christianists go to evade and downplay any actual position.

While I also believe it's true that the best defense is a good offense, it seems to me that in this case, it is pure deflection.

Inherent in the soul of any non-Christian western man is going to be a massive amount of cognitive dissonance and spiritual denial which the soul is not going to be able to deal with in any healthy manner.

Every man has to come to terms with their inherent human need of spirituality in some form, and the western man who attempts to do this with "I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE", attempting to emulate some kind of faggoty California-style Buddhism, or embracing the Dawkins style religion of atheism, will eventually crash into the fact that it just doesn't fucking work.

Somehow or some way, they have to confront their own bitterness and denial of their birthright, and it usually leads to an existential crisis. It's among the saddest things I've ever seen; look at Richard Spencer. He is a broken shell of a thing who was unable to come to terms with himself or his beliefs.

Hell, look at any of his supporters, you will find broken people who have no real conviction and no real beliefs about..well...anything at all. To Spencer, Enoch and his ilk, religion is a tool and a superficial thing because they've been utterly and completely blinded by their own hubris. They simply don't understand the role of God in their lives. Frankly, as loathesome as they are, I pity them.
Your poetry is true. Realigion is the poetry of politics. It can be achieved. It must be achieved. We would not be human if it couldn't. Morality is indistinguishable from shared human agency. It is that common medium through wich truth is abstacted and expressed throughout institution as legitimate progression of knowledge. Our collective Will is the energy which compels a state of change to progress in the direction of our agency. The name of the game is to exist in the future, where that which continues must change by moving forward. If a people desire to prevail within a spiritual struggle, they must achieve the morality which justifies Victory. We will only achieve it together.

1582485625846.jpg
 

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
It could have been predicted that the empiricist would not recognize when the age of empiricism ended, instead he will make absurd claims such as history itself ending instead of the age of empiricism. The empiricist does not see that history is perceived by humans through human knowledge, not by positive affirmations in academic scripture. The age itself was only ever his own perception of it existing. It did not exist because he made it exist. It was made for him to exist.
lmao okay and I'm done engaging this dude. I think it's clear from my post history that I've advocated strongly for free speech and erring on the side of lax moderation on these forums but uh, can we ban this guy? I don't think being here is mentally beneficial for him or his state of mind.
I really feel compelled to return to this post by our fellow memeber. I think perhaps he did not get the message I was transmitting. It is simple. We all know it. We have been at a struggle with it our entire lives in escalation up to the moment now which fortunately has been able to achieve positive signs of improvement. The message is KNOW THYSELF, and we will know the universe and GOD. Nothing is achievable without it and we can only achieve it together.
Plato-being.jpg
Tolkien.jpg
 

Notsure

memeber of The Alliance and (assistant to) Pope
Old World Underground
You are an incredibly stupid person.
  1. The printing press opened the door to mass literacy.
  2. Mass literacy started the demystification process of religious texts.
  3. Demystification opened up the space for reinterpretation.
  4. Reinterpretation opened up the space for dozens of thousands of Christian denominations.
  5. Fragmentation of Christianity devalued it, relativized it, and delegitimized it.
Churchianity is not Christianity. What church exists today does not alter what church existed in the past, or change the reason it was established, or disqualify the success it had accomplished. It must be recognized what positive achievements this faith has accomplished for humanity. If you do not, your criticisms will be dismissed. I wish to inspire you to be positive. show us your beauty
 

KangO'DaKrakas

Active member
And what do atheists do? Moslems? Jews? Buddhist converts? Neo-pagans?

It's an idiotic point to say that in this corrupt system, where virtually everything is corrupt, that it is a notable fact that churches are corrupt. You people hint that it was somehow always that way, but you won't actually say it because you know if you do you'll get crushed. So you just claim the church is corrupt therefore Christianity is bad.

This is like saying "the only restaurant on my street is a McDonald's, so I've decided to stop eating food." It's just purposefully dumb, meant to confuse stupid people.

The reason that the church is corrupt is that the Jews worked tirelessly for nearly a century to corrupt it. The government has also actively worked to destroy the church with this tax exemption bullshit which turned them all into money machines that couldn't talk about real issues pressing on society.

The solution to McDonald's being unhealthy is to find other food, not to stop eating. The solution to churches being corrupt is to find another place to practice your faith, not to burn in hell.
I agree with this somewhat except that I don't think they can be changed. Maybe I will be proven wrong.
 

Northwestguy

Well-known member
If, say, I wanted to look into becoming a Christian, which Church or denomination or whatever could I check out that wouldn't ask me to send my money to feed niggers?
Try any True Orthodox church if you're in America. For the most part these are local churches and do not answer to Moscow or Constantinople. One of those is where Matt Heimbach got baptised... though the priest who baptised him got kicked out later for doing it. The said priest, Matt Johnson, was able to join another True Orthodox church quickly though.
 

GoodOlboY

Well-known member
The Jews today aren't doing anything like what Revelation says. The Revelation was written for 1st century Christians who were being stoned to death for blasphemy at the request of the Jews. You are not being stoned to death for blasphemy. Having your twitter account deleted because the ADL complained is nothing comparable to what the bible says.
I just read that entire Book earlier this week, and didn't see one fucking thing about stoning. I saw things about one-world currency and marks and blasphemous nations and the righteous and disasters and worshiping at the Throne of God and the glory of the Second Coming of Christ.

But I did not see one fucking thing about throwing rocks, kike.
 

Jim Hansen

Well-known member
I just read that entire Book earlier this week, and didn't see one fucking thing about stoning. I saw things about one-world currency and marks and blasphemous nations and the righteous and disasters and worshiping at the Throne of God and the glory of the Second Coming of Christ.

But I did not see one fucking thing about throwing rocks, kike.
And after reading the Book ... you realized that you've got a front-row seat to witness and experience the most incredible event that will ever be recorded in history.
 

jpietre

New member
If, say, I wanted to look into becoming a Christian, which Church or denomination or whatever could I check out that wouldn't ask me to send my money to feed niggers?
Just believe in the Lord Jesus Christ to have you in heaven, and you'll be in heaven (John 6:47). Jesus is God who died and shed His blood to pay for our sins, and who then resurrected from the dead (1 Corinthians 15:3-4). That's the simplicity that is needed. Some places have gone on to virtue signaling and it is annoying to listen to them do that.
 
Top