Andrew Anglin AMA

Andrew Anglin

🐁 πŸŽ€ π“‚π’Άπ“ˆπ“‰π‘’π“‡ 𝒸𝒽𝒾𝑒𝒻 πŸŽ€ 🐁
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»
png-transparent-hani-weekly-idol-exid-korean-idol-audition-hani-hair-accessory-kpop-korean-idol.png

NOTE: This is unedited and un-proofread stream of consciousness writing specifically for the forum, and anyone who cares enough to come to the forum to read it. I'm just dumping a bunch of thoughts, and then I will answer any questions that people have in the comments below.

Someone on the forum recently went on a rampage spamming that I said "breed out the white race" in a podcast from over a decade ago, and it's possible that some people didn't know about this and thought it was some new revelation to "expose" me.

This was a podcast with some black guy, that I recorded when I was drunk, and a lot of it was sarcastic/trolling. I had an ongoing back and forth with this host, who was actually a mulatto and sort of clever in a lot of ways.

Here is an article from exactly six years ago (to the day, funnily enough) talking about this podcast, and linking to the full podcast in question (it's kinda cringe, obviously, but since it's been spammed everywhere, and is exculpatory, I included it - I don't know if the link still works, but I'm sure if someone wants to dig through that dirty laundry like some kind of bulbous, perverted, clinically mentally ill walrus, they can find it).


The 2017 Atlantic article also cataloged this. And I wrote about it on my blog Total Fascism. The actual philosophical work I did was mostly cataloged on a blog called "Outlaw Journalism."

There are also entire podcasts devoted to this, probably more than 25 hours, which I doubt can be found, when I first became a nationalist. I was interviewed by some of the boomers of that time, many of whom are now dead or otherwise incapacitated. David Duke and Stormfront did exist when I was going through my journey, but had not had really any exposure to that material before I started my blog. Some of the people from that side interviewed me back then, and I discussed my whole development openly.

Furthermore, I've written about my own philosophical journey a lot, and there is a direct line of me writing publicly about the ideas I had about issues going all the way back to 2003, or maybe a little bit earlier. I had a blog/forum on MySpace, originally.

However, I think it's worth simply writing this out again. I'm sure that there are people who like me who would be confused by the way this is being represented by some of my internet enemies. (Note that I do not really consider these people enemies, and it is bizarre that so many people have become obsessed with me. Again, all I've really done is write my ideas online. Some of these people are now proved to be feds, of course. Regardless, any time you go after someone personally, it's because you can't deal with their public ideas. Years ago, I found that a member of a supposedly right-wing group had recorded a podcast saying that he made a deal to work with the FBI, and also talked about his involvement with trannies. I made it clear that in my opinion, his involvement with trannies was a personal matter, and what I was concerned about was his admission that he worked with the FBI. Yes, it's possible that someone's personal life might speak to their character, but why would my personal character matter to anyone? If I was a serial killer, would it change the truthfulness or lack thereof of what I've written on this website? Note that when the Jews attacked me in the Atlantic, it was just this bizarre thousands of words of personal attacks - including the "breed out the white race" tape, along with accusations of homosexuality and child molestation. There was virtually zero wordage devoted to my actual stated position on issues.)

I have never tried to cover any of this up. The only thing I ever did asked to be removed was people spamming that I was a pedophile, and I did that back in 2012-13. Again, I don't want to get personal, but no one can really imagine what it feels like to have a situation where every time someone, including personal friends or family members, types in your name, it says "ABSOLUTE PROOF ANDREW ANGLIN IS A PEDOPHILE." There was one video that someone had found from social media (something that I had literally recorded just to share with friends), where I was with a girl who was either 20 or 21, and referred to her as "jailbait." This was just a joke, because people had said she looked young (Asians look younger than they are). So yes, I did request that YouTube take down some of those videos, and then I posted my own copy, with the full video (which was eventually deleted by YouTube, of course). I wouldn't bother with it now, of course, but at the time people doing hundreds of uploads on every site calling me a pedophile, so everyone anyone typed into Google or YouTube said that I was a pedophile, seemed like an unreasonable situation.

Again, I have written my entire philosophical journey on the internet. I wrote about what I was thinking at the time, when my thinking developed, but I've also gone back several times and written essays about it, after various haters (virtually all of whom have now been directly linked to feds) spread this information everywhere. I've never claimed to be any kind of special person or a leader or anything else, all I've ever wanted to do is write a website, so the idea of finding out some hidden mystery about me has always been just really grimy. I have my ideas out there, and if people want to disagree with my ideas, they can do so, and I tend to respond if there is something new.

I responded extensively to neo-Nazi groups who were promoting the hardcore Marxist "believe all women" program, then promoting the coronavirus lockdown. These groups are linked to feds, and instead of responding to my responses, they attacked me personally, and started reposting this podcast and saying the fact that I'd changed my views meant that... I don't know what it meant. That I was part of a conspiracy?

I don't really like to talk about my personal life at all, frankly, because it is no one's business and it would actually probably sound like I was complaining.

But I do talk in broad strokes about my personal journey in the forward to my new book, which is hopefully coming out in 2021. So I can go through that here, in bullet point.

  • Growing up, I always felt something was very wrong with society
  • I was middle class or maybe upper middle class in the midwest, and my parents were conservative, normie, evangelical (it all felt empty at the same time as I was drawn to it because I was raised in it)
  • My parents were divorced, and as a teen, I had some substance abuse issues (mainly weed), and I had various drama with women and so on, and none of it seemed correct - everything in society appeared to be broken
  • I had some interesting experiences with psychedelics (something that I do not recommend to people, because I now believe you can connect with demons in this way - that didn't happen to me, but only by God's grace)
  • As a child, I listened to Rush Limbaugh and Art Bell
  • As a teen in school, I believed in whatever edgy thing was going on at the time, and listened to some punk rock, which ended up being the proto movement for Antifa (the only one that holds up really are the Dead Kennedys and maybe Against Me! (which was actually later, but I saw them live a couple times when I was 13-14)
  • In my late teens, I started getting into Alex Jones (who was very different back then, very much into hardcore conspiracy theories), David Icke, along with William Cooper type stuff (along with Jordan Maxwell and some other stuff which I think now is kinda garbage tier). I was also into ancient civilizations (it was all mostly right-wingish)
  • I looked at all of the different religions, including reading the Koran and going to a mosque and talking to Moslems for several months (I still have a certain amount of respect for the Koran itself and a lot of historic Islamic scholars, and I understand why GuΓ©non and others converted to Islam)
  • I had a period where people accused me of being schizophrenic, or drug-addled (even though I was not using drugs other than marijuana, which I stopped using around this time), because I was finding out about a lot of conspiracies, many of which were true. It is hard to process this stuff for people now, you've seen people get redpilled and go nuts, but imagine doing it when this information had not yet been organized on the internet)
  • I left America, in part because of fear of getting involved in drugs, and in part just because I felt the society was very restrictive.
  • Outside of America, primarily in Asia, the whole race thing became clear
  • I then started getting into many post-Marxist the French authors, including Jaques Ellul, who was the inspiration for Ted Kaczinski (I read Ellul's Technological Society and Technological System, as well as Propaganda, on Ted's recommendation)
  • At the point of the podcast, I had begun to believe that the natural state of humanity was a hunter-gatherer lifestyle or small scale agrarianism
  • I lived in a jungle with primitive people for about a year, in Southern Philippines. This was without electricity. Some of the people had second hand clothes from American Aid groups, but some wore traditional woven dress. There was some hunting of wild boar with locally made shotguns, but it was mostly gardening, fishing and raising chickens. I was bamboo huts.
  • I slowly began to just get bored. I was reading these super-dense philosophical books (as well as a fair amount of novels) even after I learned the language of these people, because I realized all they do is gibber with each other about inane nonsense. There was no "noble savage" higher knowledge. At all. By this time, some of them had had their traditional religions destroyed by evangelical "missionary" cults, which wasn't working out. The ones who became Catholic, however (which is the dominant religion of the Philippines), I found were doing okay, and integrating into the larger society in a healthy way. The priest who had lived among them had like 60 kids, not because he was a rapist, but because women were coming to him wanting white babies (obviously he was still abusing his position, but it was definitely complicated). That's a long story, which I will save for my memoirs.
  • This is where the "breed out white people" comes in. I was concerned about a technological apocalypse, and understood that only white people had ever developed technology. It seemed to me at the time that the only path of technology was ultimately a borg type system, because once the industrial revolution began, there was only one path.
  • So, while I realize that "breed out white people" sounds like something Robin DiAngelo would say, it's really, really not even remotely related to that. It is likely related to the positions of the Extinction Rebellion group that exists now (I don't know their view on hierarchy, however, and if they say they're against hierarchy or they support homosexuality or feminism, then they are not actually anarcho-primitivists, because those things are impossible in the natural state). But there was never anything "left wing" really in the view, as I was arguing in favor of a system of families and tribes living in concert with nature, in our naturally violent state.
  • I should also note that I did indeed have a negative view of white people, as a result of my upbringing. I also found that Asians, as well as Latin Americans and even Arabs, were generally more happy (I now understand the relationship of this with the brain)
  • The thinking and the goal was that if white people did not exist to create technology, other races would remain living in a state of harmony with nature, simply because they do not have the intelligence or the drive to build this technology.
  • By the time the podcast was recorded, I had already begun to read some of the fascist materials, which I had had no previous exposure to, but was finding on /new/ (the precursor to /pol/).
  • I began to see that what fascism was was the application of tribal identities, values and hierarchical structure to a society featuring technology.
  • After moving out of the jungle to [that's my own private business], I started the blog "Total Fascism" not for the purpose of sharing what I'd been reading in these fascist books. I was still working through it myself on some level, but I had basically come to a conclusion with regards to nationalism as tribalism and authoritarianism as a human expression of divine order.
  • I was already pretty clear on the race issue, having lived in Asia for the better part of a decade, so the idea of the Jews as a race, and just the general theories about race put forward by the Nazis, was pretty easy for me to grasp.
  • It wasn't until after I had looked at Mein Kampf, Myth of the Twentieth Century, huge amounts of Nazi Party literature, Julius Evola, Serrano, Devi (most of which I had come at through Heidegger and Schopenhauer, though it was also a topic on /new/) that I started to look at the more modern stuff, including George Lincoln Rockwell
  • About a year into the blogging at Total Fascism, I found that the ideas were very popular, and also found that I had worked through my own personal philosophy enough to start to spread the ideas on a larger scale, so I started Daily Stormer
My views have not really changed since 2012, when I began developing the idea for the Daily Stormer, which was heavily influenced by not just politics, but also the organic culture I had come to love on 4chan.

I have become "more Christian" I would say. I was born believing in God, and blessed with confirmation of His existence, but throughout the above journey, I struggled with Christianity specifically as the One True Faith. I don't struggle with that anymore. I don't really think that is a change of philosophy, so much as just a personal developmental change I underwent - a strengthening of my faith.

During the anarcho-primitivist period, I had been interested in the concept of pantheism, but I've come to grasp, not the least through George Berkeley's "immaterialism" more so than gnosticism (the latter of which I remain ambivalent about, and really have not had the time to give it a proper read through - given the nature of the material, it would really take a lot of time).

I think some of my thoughts have sharpened over the last 8-9 years, as you would hope they would. For example, I feel I have a very good understanding of the concept of "ideology" now, and I think at the start I was still thinking of white ethnonationalism as a form of ideology (I no longer think that - as I've written). But all of my basic positions and premises remain in tact - I believe in family, and community, and I believe that genetic similarity is key to this, which is why I believe in ethnonationalism. I consider this philosophy, rather than ideology.

The reason you see various right-wing people make these huge leaps in their views (aside from fed influence, which I think is clearly a big factor) is that they didn't have the more than a decade of experience that I had trying to figure out what was going on.

My goal with the site was to provide a clear image of the truth I had found, through what was actually very intense and difficult personal and academic work. I also felt a need to demystify the stuff surrounding racism, and the Nazis, through humor, because I felt like as long as there was this sacred cow, the Jewish issue was this roadblock that no one could get around, and humor was the best way to kill that sacred cow. I think that's worked.

It does often seem like people, especially people who may be younger, don't understand just how little "redpill" information was available on the internet ten years ago, let alone 20 years ago when I first found Alex Jones on shortwave radio. I did very serious work to find out what I know, and now it is just all out there. Other than /pol/ generally, the Daily Stormer is the site most responsible for getting this information out, and that is simply a fact. It's not a fact I mention often, because it sounds conceited, but it is true. To make it sound less conceited, let me just say that all the glory is to God, and I feel that I've been led down this path specifically to bring this understanding to the people.

I always encourage everyone to follow the cliche, and "do your own research." But understand, I am not the leader of anything, and I am not and have never asked anyone to follow me as a leader. What I have done is tried my very best to put out true information, consistently, and to amplify it as much as I can, using the tools at my disposal.

This is to say: I don't owe anyone anything. The person who triggered this thread, which I am thankful happened, was one of many who have "called me out" and demanded that I explain myself to him, personally. No one has any right to ask that of me. I am putting up this thread, as an "ask me anything," because I plan to respond to whatever questions people have. But I am doing that voluntarily, not because I owe it to anyone. All I have ever done is write words on the internet. This does not make me a "leader of a movement." Since Charlottesville especially, I have removed myself from political activism completely, other than the most basic thing of supporting Donald Trump. I will not ever promote another political event, unless it is literally a normie event. I will also not directly promote any political actor (other than, on some level, Nick Fuentes).

I will also just add that this person who was spamming the forum, calling me a race traitor and whatever else, also claimed to have donated to me, which means I owe him something. It does not mean that. If you donate to the site, you are helping support my work, which is relaying this information. You are not buying me. I have made it 100% clear, repeatedly, that I do not keep any record at all of who donates to me, which also means that anyone can say "I donated to you" without there being any evidence that this happened. I don't use email anymore, but before when I did, if someone would email me and say "I sent you money," I would say "thank you very much, it really helps" and delete the email. I do not want to be influenced in any way by donors, nor do I want to be indebted.

I personally feel that anyone who reads this site has a responsibility to donate to it, as much as they are capable of doing (even if it is $5 a year). I feel that you all it not to me, but to the site for the information it has provided you with. Obviously, I don't enforce that, and I don't even ask for donations very regularly, but that is my position. When someone claims I owe them something because of a donation, my thinking is "okay, give me back all of the information from your brain that you learned here, and I'll refund the donation."

I have obviously totally destroyed my own personal life in devoting myself to this cause. I'm not posting my IQ, but I will tell you - there are a lot of ways to make money in this world, and if I was concerned about money, I would not be doing this.

Final, unrelated thing

Since I'm posting a long post here, I just want to add that over the last year on this forum, I may have abused some people, verbally. My thinking has generally been "wake this person up by dressing them down," though it's possible I've gone overboard with that sometimes, especially since people are having a hard enough time with the general situation of the apocalypse.

But, for anyone who has been dressed down in a way that may have gone overboard, note that I did not do that to the person who triggered this thread. He was spamming all over the forum that I was a traitor and so on, and talking about his donation and how I owe him, and I simply asked that he be banned from the forum. That is to say, any dressing down was out of love, as if someone is doing what this person did, and just outright attacking me and making demands, accusing me of things, I have no love to write an aggressive response with.

Furthermore, as a rule, along the lines of the fact that I don't owe any of you anything (not personally, I do feel I owe something to the population at large, and to the historical record, and to God who gave me life), I don't think it is ever appropriate for anyone to tag me on the forum and demand I explain something to them. I recently dressed down that French guy, Bermajul or whatever, and maybe went overboard, because he did this. I hope he comes back.

I've been very frustrated with the forum since all those people left, which I maintain was an inappropriate and emotional response to basically petty forum politics. I would also appreciate it if people generally would use the forum as a place to spread information, rather than just garbage shitposting. One of the reasons I have the forum is to mine content, and I wish that if someone started a thread, instead of just replying "well he's my thoughts," they would also add some information, in the form of further links, images, videos, etc. There was recently a Jimmy Dore thread, regarding the Daily Beast article about him, and I feel like I should have been able to go to that thread and get a series of related tweets, comments, screenshots, etc. that people had collectively put together. Instead the only content was "well, here's what I think about that." The entire core of the article was about an interview that Dore did with a Boogaloo boy, and no one bothered to post that video in the thread. Discussion is fine, but this should be a place where there is also information, and people should feel an obligation to contribute information. I have personally started threads asking for information, and it devolves into "well, let me tell you what I think about that." This is frustrating to me.

Forum registration

As I imagine people who don't have accounts will be reading this, and wanting the forum to open up - billions of dollars just got dumped into anti-white "counterterrorism," and a lot of that is going to be people posting on the internet to try to spread disinformation, promote violence, and confuse people generally. So now is not a good time to open registration, because we would just get flooded with feds. We may be able to do some kind of invite feature in the future, where long time users can invite friends.

Anyway - ask me anything. I might not be prompt, but I will try to keep up with this thread.
 

Coltraine

America First
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ–
If you could fight anyone dead or alive, who would it be?

I don't know if you saw this thread earlier, but I think your answer would probably be good. For the dead person, I originally picked FDR myself, but then I changed my mind to William F. Buckley later on after I realized that it probably wouldn't be very fun fighting a crippled old man really.

For the alive part, I picked Charlie Kirk. That was an easy one.

I'm also just trying to kick this whole thing off here, Anglin. Perhaps with an easy one or something. At the same time, however, I hope this thread doesn't waste too much of your own time with peoples' various bullshit kind of questions which have already long been answered ad nauseum. I remember still when you did this AMA before several years ago on the old bbs. And I remember the thread seemed to go on forever. Part of the reason why I like this forum so much is your regular engagement with us lowly plebes. Anyway, have fun with it would be my suggestion.
 

montanapeter

Well-known member
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
Thank You for your website, your take on current events is correct. Your analysis of the zeitgeist is accurate. I appreciate your devotion. When I read your articles I tend to scroll right through the links and zip right to your writings, I value your opinion the most and you are my favorite commenter. Thank you for sharing your opinion, please continue.
I understand how frustrating it can be to recognize the whole media apparatus, and half our fellow citizens "just don't get it", and the information struggle seems unwinnable, but you get up each day and keep moving forward. Good job!
 
Last edited:

Pandadude12345

South Carolinian: "Pandadude12345" America First!
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»
Pandadude12345
View attachment 48218

NOTE: This is unedited and un-proofread stream of consciousness writing specifically for the forum, and anyone who cares enough to come to the forum to read it. I'm just dumping a bunch of thoughts, and then I will answer any questions that people have in the comments below.

Someone on the forum recently went on a rampage spamming that I said "breed out the white race" in a podcast from over a decade ago, and it's possible that some people didn't know about this and thought it was some new revelation to "expose" me.

This was a podcast with some black guy, that I recorded when I was drunk, and a lot of it was sarcastic/trolling. I had an ongoing back and forth with this host, who was actually a mulatto and sort of clever in a lot of ways.

Here is an article from exactly six years ago (to the day, funnily enough) talking about this podcast, and linking to the full podcast in question (it's kinda cringe, obviously, but since it's been spammed everywhere, and is exculpatory, I included it - I don't know if the link still works, but I'm sure if someone wants to dig through that dirty laundry like some kind of bulbous, perverted, clinically mentally ill walrus, they can find it).


The 2017 Atlantic article also cataloged this. And I wrote about it on my blog Total Fascism. The actual philosophical work I did was mostly cataloged on a blog called "Outlaw Journalism."

There are also entire podcasts devoted to this, probably more than 25 hours, which I doubt can be found, when I first became a nationalist. I was interviewed by some of the boomers of that time, many of whom are now dead or otherwise incapacitated. David Duke and Stormfront did exist when I was going through my journey, but had not had really any exposure to that material before I started my blog. Some of the people from that side interviewed me back then, and I discussed my whole development openly.

Furthermore, I've written about my own philosophical journey a lot, and there is a direct line of me writing publicly about the ideas I had about issues going all the way back to 2003, or maybe a little bit earlier. I had a blog/forum on MySpace, originally.

However, I think it's worth simply writing this out again. I'm sure that there are people who like me who would be confused by the way this is being represented by some of my internet enemies. (Note that I do not really consider these people enemies, and it is bizarre that so many people have become obsessed with me. Again, all I've really done is write my ideas online. Some of these people are now proved to be feds, of course. Regardless, any time you go after someone personally, it's because you can't deal with their public ideas. Years ago, I found that a member of a supposedly right-wing group had recorded a podcast saying that he made a deal to work with the FBI, and also talked about his involvement with trannies. I made it clear that in my opinion, his involvement with trannies was a personal matter, and what I was concerned about was his admission that he worked with the FBI. Yes, it's possible that someone's personal life might speak to their character, but why would my personal character matter to anyone? If I was a serial killer, would it change the truthfulness or lack thereof of what I've written on this website? Note that when the Jews attacked me in the Atlantic, it was just this bizarre thousands of words of personal attacks - including the "breed out the white race" tape, along with accusations of homosexuality and child molestation. There was virtually zero wordage devoted to my actual stated position on issues.)

I have never tried to cover any of this up. The only thing I ever did asked to be removed was people spamming that I was a pedophile, and I did that back in 2012-13. Again, I don't want to get personal, but no one can really imagine what it feels like to have a situation where every time someone, including personal friends or family members, types in your name, it says "ABSOLUTE PROOF ANDREW ANGLIN IS A PEDOPHILE." There was one video that someone had found from social media (something that I had literally recorded just to share with friends), where I was with a girl who was either 20 or 21, and referred to her as "jailbait." This was just a joke, because people had said she looked young (Asians look younger than they are). So yes, I did request that YouTube take down some of those videos, and then I posted my own copy, with the full video (which was eventually deleted by YouTube, of course). I wouldn't bother with it now, of course, but at the time people doing hundreds of uploads on every site calling me a pedophile, so everyone anyone typed into Google or YouTube said that I was a pedophile, seemed like an unreasonable situation.

Again, I have written my entire philosophical journey on the internet. I wrote about what I was thinking at the time, when my thinking developed, but I've also gone back several times and written essays about it, after various haters (virtually all of whom have now been directly linked to feds) spread this information everywhere. I've never claimed to be any kind of special person or a leader or anything else, all I've ever wanted to do is write a website, so the idea of finding out some hidden mystery about me has always been just really grimy. I have my ideas out there, and if people want to disagree with my ideas, they can do so, and I tend to respond if there is something new.

I responded extensively to neo-Nazi groups who were promoting the hardcore Marxist "believe all women" program, then promoting the coronavirus lockdown. These groups are linked to feds, and instead of responding to my responses, they attacked me personally, and started reposting this podcast and saying the fact that I'd changed my views meant that... I don't know what it meant. That I was part of a conspiracy?

I don't really like to talk about my personal life at all, frankly, because it is no one's business and it would actually probably sound like I was complaining.

But I do talk in broad strokes about my personal journey in the forward to my new book, which is hopefully coming out in 2021. So I can go through that here, in bullet point.

  • Growing up, I always felt something was very wrong with society
  • I was middle class or maybe upper middle class in the midwest, and my parents were conservative, normie, evangelical (it all felt empty at the same time as I was drawn to it because I was raised in it)
  • My parents were divorced, and as a teen, I had some substance abuse issues (mainly weed), and I had various drama with women and so on, and none of it seemed correct - everything in society appeared to be broken
  • I had some interesting experiences with psychedelics (something that I do not recommend to people, because I now believe you can connect with demons in this way - that didn't happen to me, but only by God's grace)
  • As a child, I listened to Rush Limbaugh and Art Bell
  • As a teen in school, I believed in whatever edgy thing was going on at the time, and listened to some punk rock, which ended up being the proto movement for Antifa (the only one that holds up really are the Dead Kennedys and maybe Against Me! (which was actually later, but I saw them live a couple times when I was 13-14)
  • In my late teens, I started getting into Alex Jones (who was very different back then, very much into hardcore conspiracy theories), David Icke, along with William Cooper type stuff (along with Jordan Maxwell and some other stuff which I think now is kinda garbage tier). I was also into ancient civilizations (it was all mostly right-wingish)
  • I looked at all of the different religions, including reading the Koran and going to a mosque and talking to Moslems for several months (I still have a certain amount of respect for the Koran itself and a lot of historic Islamic scholars, and I understand why GuΓ©non and others converted to Islam)
  • I had a period where people accused me of being schizophrenic, or drug-addled (even though I was not using drugs other than marijuana, which I stopped using around this time), because I was finding out about a lot of conspiracies, many of which were true. It is hard to process this stuff for people now, you've seen people get redpilled and go nuts, but imagine doing it when this information had not yet been organized on the internet)
  • I left America, in part because of fear of getting involved in drugs, and in part just because I felt the society was very restrictive.
  • Outside of America, primarily in Asia, the whole race thing became clear
  • I then started getting into many post-Marxist the French authors, including Jaques Ellul, who was the inspiration for Ted Kaczinski (I read Ellul's Technological Society and Technological System, as well as Propaganda, on Ted's recommendation)
  • At the point of the podcast, I had begun to believe that the natural state of humanity was a hunter-gatherer lifestyle or small scale agrarianism
  • I lived in a jungle with primitive people for about a year, in Southern Philippines. This was without electricity. Some of the people had second hand clothes from American Aid groups, but some wore traditional woven dress. There was some hunting of wild boar with locally made shotguns, but it was mostly gardening, fishing and raising chickens. I was bamboo huts.
  • I slowly began to just get bored. I was reading these super-dense philosophical books (as well as a fair amount of novels) even after I learned the language of these people, because I realized all they do is gibber with each other about inane nonsense. There was no "noble savage" higher knowledge. At all. By this time, some of them had had their traditional religions destroyed by evangelical "missionary" cults, which wasn't working out. The ones who became Catholic, however (which is the dominant religion of the Philippines), I found were doing okay, and integrating into the larger society in a healthy way. The priest who had lived among them had like 60 kids, not because he was a rapist, but because women were coming to him wanting white babies (obviously he was still abusing his position, but it was definitely complicated). That's a long story, which I will save for my memoirs.
  • This is where the "breed out white people" comes in. I was concerned about a technological apocalypse, and understood that only white people had ever developed technology. It seemed to me at the time that the only path of technology was ultimately a borg type system, because once the industrial revolution began, there was only one path.
  • So, while I realize that "breed out white people" sounds like something Robin DiAngelo would say, it's really, really not even remotely related to that. It is likely related to the positions of the Extinction Rebellion group that exists now (I don't know their view on hierarchy, however, and if they say they're against hierarchy or they support homosexuality or feminism, then they are not actually anarcho-primitivists, because those things are impossible in the natural state). But there was never anything "left wing" really in the view, as I was arguing in favor of a system of families and tribes living in concert with nature, in our naturally violent state.
  • I should also note that I did indeed have a negative view of white people, as a result of my upbringing. I also found that Asians, as well as Latin Americans and even Arabs, were generally more happy (I now understand the relationship of this with the brain)
  • The thinking and the goal was that if white people did not exist to create technology, other races would remain living in a state of harmony with nature, simply because they do not have the intelligence or the drive to build this technology.
  • By the time the podcast was recorded, I had already begun to read some of the fascist materials, which I had had no previous exposure to, but was finding on /new/ (the precursor to /pol/).
  • I began to see that what fascism was was the application of tribal identities, values and hierarchical structure to a society featuring technology.
  • After moving out of the jungle to [that's my own private business], I started the blog "Total Fascism" not for the purpose of sharing what I'd been reading in these fascist books. I was still working through it myself on some level, but I had basically come to a conclusion with regards to nationalism as tribalism and authoritarianism as a human expression of divine order.
  • I was already pretty clear on the race issue, having lived in Asia for the better part of a decade, so the idea of the Jews as a race, and just the general theories about race put forward by the Nazis, was pretty easy for me to grasp.
  • It wasn't until after I had looked at Mein Kampf, Myth of the Twentieth Century, huge amounts of Nazi Party literature, Julius Evola, Serrano, Devi (most of which I had come at through Heidegger and Schopenhauer, though it was also a topic on /new/) that I started to look at the more modern stuff, including George Lincoln Rockwell
  • About a year into the blogging at Total Fascism, I found that the ideas were very popular, and also found that I had worked through my own personal philosophy enough to start to spread the ideas on a larger scale, so I started Daily Stormer
My views have not really changed since 2012, when I began developing the idea for the Daily Stormer, which was heavily influenced by not just politics, but also the organic culture I had come to love on 4chan.

I have become "more Christian" I would say. I was born believing in God, and blessed with confirmation of His existence, but throughout the above journey, I struggled with Christianity specifically as the One True Faith. I don't struggle with that anymore. I don't really think that is a change of philosophy, so much as just a personal developmental change I underwent - a strengthening of my faith.

During the anarcho-primitivist period, I had been interested in the concept of pantheism, but I've come to grasp, not the least through George Berkeley's "immaterialism" more so than gnosticism (the latter of which I remain ambivalent about, and really have not had the time to give it a proper read through - given the nature of the material, it would really take a lot of time).

I think some of my thoughts have sharpened over the last 8-9 years, as you would hope they would. For example, I feel I have a very good understanding of the concept of "ideology" now, and I think at the start I was still thinking of white ethnonationalism as a form of ideology (I no longer think that - as I've written). But all of my basic positions and premises remain in tact - I believe in family, and community, and I believe that genetic similarity is key to this, which is why I believe in ethnonationalism. I consider this philosophy, rather than ideology.

The reason you see various right-wing people make these huge leaps in their views (aside from fed influence, which I think is clearly a big factor) is that they didn't have the more than a decade of experience that I had trying to figure out what was going on.

My goal with the site was to provide a clear image of the truth I had found, through what was actually very intense and difficult personal and academic work. I also felt a need to demystify the stuff surrounding racism, and the Nazis, through humor, because I felt like as long as there was this sacred cow, the Jewish issue was this roadblock that no one could get around, and humor was the best way to kill that sacred cow. I think that's worked.

It does often seem like people, especially people who may be younger, don't understand just how little "redpill" information was available on the internet ten years ago, let alone 20 years ago when I first found Alex Jones on shortwave radio. I did very serious work to find out what I know, and now it is just all out there. Other than /pol/ generally, the Daily Stormer is the site most responsible for getting this information out, and that is simply a fact. It's not a fact I mention often, because it sounds conceited, but it is true. To make it sound less conceited, let me just say that all the glory is to God, and I feel that I've been led down this path specifically to bring this understanding to the people.

I always encourage everyone to follow the cliche, and "do your own research." But understand, I am not the leader of anything, and I am not and have never asked anyone to follow me as a leader. What I have done is tried my very best to put out true information, consistently, and to amplify it as much as I can, using the tools at my disposal.

This is to say: I don't owe anyone anything. The person who triggered this thread, which I am thankful happened, was one of many who have "called me out" and demanded that I explain myself to him, personally. No one has any right to ask that of me. I am putting up this thread, as an "ask me anything," because I plan to respond to whatever questions people have. But I am doing that voluntarily, not because I owe it to anyone. All I have ever done is write words on the internet. This does not make me a "leader of a movement." Since Charlottesville especially, I have removed myself from political activism completely, other than the most basic thing of supporting Donald Trump. I will not ever promote another political event, unless it is literally a normie event. I will also not directly promote any political actor (other than, on some level, Nick Fuentes).

I will also just add that this person who was spamming the forum, calling me a race traitor and whatever else, also claimed to have donated to me, which means I owe him something. It does not mean that. If you donate to the site, you are helping support my work, which is relaying this information. You are not buying me. I have made it 100% clear, repeatedly, that I do not keep any record at all of who donates to me, which also means that anyone can say "I donated to you" without there being any evidence that this happened. I don't use email anymore, but before when I did, if someone would email me and say "I sent you money," I would say "thank you very much, it really helps" and delete the email. I do not want to be influenced in any way by donors, nor do I want to be indebted.

I personally feel that anyone who reads this site has a responsibility to donate to it, as much as they are capable of doing (even if it is $5 a year). I feel that you all it not to me, but to the site for the information it has provided you with. Obviously, I don't enforce that, and I don't even ask for donations very regularly, but that is my position. When someone claims I owe them something because of a donation, my thinking is "okay, give me back all of the information from your brain that you learned here, and I'll refund the donation."

I have obviously totally destroyed my own personal life in devoting myself to this cause. I'm not posting my IQ, but I will tell you - there are a lot of ways to make money in this world, and if I was concerned about money, I would not be doing this.

Final, unrelated thing

Since I'm posting a long post here, I just want to add that over the last year on this forum, I may have abused some people, verbally. My thinking has generally been "wake this person up by dressing them down," though it's possible I've gone overboard with that sometimes, especially since people are having a hard enough time with the general situation of the apocalypse.

But, for anyone who has been dressed down in a way that may have gone overboard, note that I did not do that to the person who triggered this thread. He was spamming all over the forum that I was a traitor and so on, and talking about his donation and how I owe him, and I simply asked that he be banned from the forum. That is to say, any dressing down was out of love, as if someone is doing what this person did, and just outright attacking me and making demands, accusing me of things, I have no love to write an aggressive response with.

Furthermore, as a rule, along the lines of the fact that I don't owe any of you anything (not personally, I do feel I owe something to the population at large, and to the historical record, and to God who gave me life), I don't think it is ever appropriate for anyone to tag me on the forum and demand I explain something to them. I recently dressed down that French guy, Bermajul or whatever, and maybe went overboard, because he did this. I hope he comes back.

I've been very frustrated with the forum since all those people left, which I maintain was an inappropriate and emotional response to basically petty forum politics. I would also appreciate it if people generally would use the forum as a place to spread information, rather than just garbage shitposting. One of the reasons I have the forum is to mine content, and I wish that if someone started a thread, instead of just replying "well he's my thoughts," they would also add some information, in the form of further links, images, videos, etc. There was recently a Jimmy Dore thread, regarding the Daily Beast article about him, and I feel like I should have been able to go to that thread and get a series of related tweets, comments, screenshots, etc. that people had collectively put together. Instead the only content was "well, here's what I think about that." The entire core of the article was about an interview that Dore did with a Boogaloo boy, and no one bothered to post that video in the thread. Discussion is fine, but this should be a place where there is also information, and people should feel an obligation to contribute information. I have personally started threads asking for information, and it devolves into "well, let me tell you what I think about that." This is frustrating to me.

Forum registration

As I imagine people who don't have accounts will be reading this, and wanting the forum to open up - billions of dollars just got dumped into anti-white "counterterrorism," and a lot of that is going to be people posting on the internet to try to spread disinformation, promote violence, and confuse people generally. So now is not a good time to open registration, because we would just get flooded with feds. We may be able to do some kind of invite feature in the future, where long time users can invite friends.

Anyway - ask me anything. I might not be prompt, but I will try to keep up with this thread.
Two things, One: I actually remember reading that article when it came out, and Two, I apologize for pinging you in all of my threads. I always wanted feedback from you, especially since I wanted to become a major player in this field.
 

bean_ shooter

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
To be honest, I'm unconcerned about past qt asian girls and past trolling comments when ideology and convictions were still being formed.
You have done good work over the years and at great cost to your life and future.
I hope you can continue to do so for many years to come.
 

Jebal_Dokundy

used to be Yodocq on old BBS
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
Wow, that was long reading. And interesting one, too. Thanks for your effort boss, it's highly appreciated on my part for sure. Even tho I would happily live without it in case it wouldn't be written.
 

Individualist

Well-known member
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
Excellent post and many thanks for opening up on such a personal level. It’s a big part of what separates you and DS from other sites where the owners are inaccessible and standoffish.

Prohibition of drugs: I’ll admit I’ve never let go of my lolbert position on that one. Just because they are not made illegal, does not mean the state condones their use. It is merely a recognition that the deleterious effects of the prohibition outweigh the deleterious effects of the drugs. Alcohol is a drug and we learned this exact lesson in the 20s. We are experiencing the same lesson now. All drugs were legal for the overwhelming majority of US history and we did not descend into a cesspit of addiction. Prescription Opioids currently ARE legal and we are descending into such a cesspit. The issue is not the legal status of the drugs but the culture that surrounds their use. You’ve come out against legalization; is that a function of the decayed state of civilization we live in or is that an absolute, always and forever regardless, kind of position?
 

Andrew Anglin

🐁 πŸŽ€ π“‚π’Άπ“ˆπ“‰π‘’π“‡ 𝒸𝒽𝒾𝑒𝒻 πŸŽ€ 🐁
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»

Andrew Anglin

🐁 πŸŽ€ π“‚π’Άπ“ˆπ“‰π‘’π“‡ 𝒸𝒽𝒾𝑒𝒻 πŸŽ€ 🐁
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»
Excellent post and many thanks for opening up on such a personal level. It’s a big part of what separates you and DS from other sites where the owners are inaccessible and standoffish.

Prohibition of drugs: I’ll admit I’ve never let go of my lolbert position on that one. Just because they are not made illegal, does not mean the state condones their use. It is merely a recognition that the deleterious effects of the prohibition outweigh the deleterious effects of the drugs. Alcohol is a drug and we learned this exact lesson in the 20s. We are experiencing the same lesson now. All drugs were legal for the overwhelming majority of US history and we did not descend into a cesspit of addiction. Prescription Opioids currently ARE legal and we are descending into such a cesspit. The issue is not the legal status of the drugs but the culture that surrounds their use. You’ve come out against legalization; is that a function of the decayed state of civilization we live in or is that an absolute, always and forever regardless, kind of position?
I'm in agreement that it is primarily a social and cultural issue, rather than a legal issue, but the legal system can, should and actually does reflect social values. Right now, because drug use is being encouraged by the establishment, they are moving towards decriminalization and legalization.

The "war on drugs" was a period when the social values were changing and the legal system hadn't caught up.

I think trying to isolate anything like that, as though it exists in a vacuum, is a waste of time. Right now, in any city in America, you can go out and purchase any drug on the street, and almost certainly face no legal consequences, because of the media push to normalize drug use, and paint drug addicts as harmless.

So the whole "war on drugs" argument is put in this vacuum, where it becomes meaningless. Especially given that we've got good documentation about law enforcement being active in the drug trade. It's just a big convoluted mess.

The libertarian argument, as I understand it, is not so much that "the war on drugs failed" as that people have a right to be drug addicts if they want, which is now the official dogma coming from the establishment. Libertarians mix in data points about the war on drugs which are likely meaningless, and also claim, I believe falsely, that use goes down if you legalize drugs (that has definitely not borne out with marijuana, or with the decriminalization of intravenous opioids in San Francisco).

Then you have questions about different drugs, the fact that some are not addictive and some are, and you have questions of treatment vs. incarceration.

If we can break out of the trappings of these ideologies, and the complexities of the enforcement of laws, and reduce it to a simple question:

"Do individuals have a moral right to choose to be drug addicts?" then I would say "hard no." I think we live in a society with social obligations, I do not believe we are atomized individuals that should be able to do whatever we want "as long as it's not hurting anyone else." Destroying yourself hurts other people, because it hurts society as a whole.

How you prevent people from using drugs is an open question, and that should be based on data. Primarily, it would be through healthy socialization, rather than law enforcement, but I think law enforcement can also be an element.
 

Andrew Anglin

🐁 πŸŽ€ π“‚π’Άπ“ˆπ“‰π‘’π“‡ 𝒸𝒽𝒾𝑒𝒻 πŸŽ€ 🐁
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»
I have a question, are you going to finish your book?
Well, I write the word count of a book every week.

As I've said, my book was scheduled for release last year, but it was so much about work and travel that it simply is not relevant in the post-coronavirus world. Telling people how to become independent and start careers or small businesses, or how to develop their understanding of society by visiting different countries cheaply (and pick up work along the way), is just simply not useful anymore.

I have a different book I am writing, which I want to finish soon, but I've got a lot going on right now.
 

Werwolf

Christ is King!
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺ️
I have a different book I am writing, which I want to finish soon, but I've got a lot going on right now.
Understood, I know you are busy. I just wanted to know because I really hope you do publish it, and I know the folks here will support it, and I’ll personally buy a couple copies, and strategically leave them places.
Best of luck.
 

anti-barabas-ite

Work stuff through in your brain...UNVAXXED
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»β›ͺοΈπŸ–
Escaped True Master
@Andrew Anglin

wild boar and home made shotguns! sounds fascinating.

the gut biome of more primitive tribes is many times that of your average westerner, they eat 5k verities of foodstuffs.

generally what type of overall health and longevity did you encounter in the Philippine's jungle?

did they make their own shotgun shells too?

collagen in beef hides is pretty good in my coffee, did you cut the hides into stripes and boil it? fry it? how did you eat the hides? or was that used for shoes?

and was there a lot of earth grounding bare-feet or whitemans rubber soled shoes?

nice of you to answer the internet detractors.

hunterwallarace can and (most likely) eat a dick...you know you read this, you too spenther!
 
Last edited:

Creepy-ass Cracker

Christ is God β€’ Catholicism is true β€’ Sede Vacante
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
@Andrew Anglin Eventually I’ll figure out how to use Monero (I’m just not there yet). In the meantime, I’ve stepped up my spiritual efforts on Anglin’s behalfβ€”and I don’t simply mean I throw in a β€œ...God bless Andrew Anglin” at the end of β€œNow I lay me down to sleep”! Oh no.

...
I’m working on building up vast, international spiritual-support network to ensure that round-the-clock prayers are offered for all of Andrew Anglin’s needs and for continued sucess his work, β€œagainst principalities and power, against the rulers of the world of this darkness, against the spirits of wickedness in the high places.”

I’ll give just a couple highlights of what we’ve got going on: Mass intentions...True Catholic priests offer their traditional Latin Masses BY NAME *on Anglin’s behalf* all over the world on almost every continent, in especially in countries like Brazil, andβ€”you’ll love thisβ€”in the Phillipines. Andβ€”wouldn’t ya know itβ€”Nigeria!

I’ve enlisted the help of these based sedevacantist nuns to pray β€œat all times”, praying especially when they make their special Marian novenas for Andrew Anglin’s intentions. 27AD86E7-3CDE-42BB-B93F-512B27145DD6.jpeg


BASED.
EE279900-7AD3-479E-89F1-D3AB86F779F8.jpeg
Countless novenas have been offered already, and will continually be offered to the most glorious and most blessed virgin Mother of God, with intentions like β€œfor Anglin’s success, safety, security, both temporal and spiritual”, for β€œprotection of Anglin and his family, friends, and benefactors, against the bondage of Satan”, β€œdeliver Andrew Anglin from the hand of all his enemies”,...as well as others more specifically worded..of course, we’re also praying, most importantly, for β€œthe grace of Andrew Anglin’s conversion to the one true Catholic faith” (my ultimate dream come true is to see Anglin converting to sedevacantist pre-Vatican II Roman Catholicism and be to Trad Caths what Roosh is for Orthobros...the seeds are already there!)
 
Last edited:

phoenixrising

patiently awaiting the coofpocalypse
Old World Underground
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
You've lived an interesting and somewhat charmed life Anglin, obviously you've been picked by God for the roll you are now fulfilling. Most of us are insignificant specks that, if we were to disappear tomorrow, apart from immediate family no one would notice or care. That's not the case for you. Forget your detractors, most are just jealous of you on some deep-seated level anyway. I'm really looking forward to your book and would love a copy if you end up publishing it.
I guess the only question I would ask is where you see yourself in ten years? Do you even think that far ahead, especially with the apparently apocalyptic events accelerating around us.
 

Paul Harrell

But who isn't an unhinged asshole these days?
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
Escaped True Master
Thanks for putting up with us forum shit heads. It's so nice to have a place to chat without being totally overrun with feds and retards like on 4chan and anywhere else.

For a long time I was gaslit into avoiding the DS. Nothing specific, just general FUD based around the idea that it was the real evil Nazi website... And by the time I found TRS through YouTube, they had already begun to distance themselves from DS and Anglin, making comments about how Anglin had gone mad or something. It's not really important, but I am ashamed that I was led to believe that DS was somehow unsavory or dishonest for so long.

I remember reading that occidental loser blog after I'd started reading the stormer. I saw the Asian "jailbait" video and thought to myself "wow, that girl is at least 20" (never mind that people who go around calling people pedophile for banging fertile women are gay/malicious/retards). I was also struck by just how poor of a writer that occidental loser fellow is. It seems to me that among other things, he's obviously jealous that you're about 100 levels higher on the writing skill tree than him. Although maybe he's too stupid to realize that.

Anyway, none of that is really groundbreaking stuff. Mostly I'd like to apologize for doubting you, even if my private, vague misgivings could not have possibly affected you negatively or otherwise. When I came to this site I had many questions and you spent hours engaging and responding, which you had zero obligation to do.

Trying to snap back on topic, what are your thoughts on StarLink, Elon Musk's satellite internet service? I've been thinking about applying for it as my internet is terrible.
 

ItsAllToast

Chinese Supremacist.
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
I really appreciate everything you do, and the sacrifices you've made to do it.

Can't think of any question that you haven't already answered on the site, though. You're an amazing writer.

Look forward to hearing more about how we can organize a functional resistance to the Davos antichrists.
 

Titus Flavius

I have made but one mistake.
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
Thank you for that personal journey.
I have things in my past that are unsavory and embarrassing.
The fact some of yours are on the interwebs is truly unfortunate.
Your writing in the past year has gotten truly sublime. Like @Paul Harrell I used to visit that occidental losers site.
Last year at the beginning of this hoax when everything was shut down and locked down the fat loser was bragging about going fishing with his buddies while on his site he was going into histrionics about the deadly China virus. I found that stomach turning.
@Andrew Anglin at that time was a voice of reason which was helpful.
Keep writing, read the Bible, and trust Jesus with everything.
 

Andrew Anglin

🐁 πŸŽ€ π“‚π’Άπ“ˆπ“‰π‘’π“‡ 𝒸𝒽𝒾𝑒𝒻 πŸŽ€ 🐁
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»
Understood, I know you are busy. I just wanted to know because I really hope you do publish it, and I know the folks here will support it, and I’ll personally buy a couple copies, and strategically leave them places.
Best of luck.
Well, I can't really physically publish it, definitely can't sell it.

So it would be a .pdf designed to print, and maybe some day someone would print it. I would probably publish it with an open license of some kind.
 

Andrew Anglin

🐁 πŸŽ€ π“‚π’Άπ“ˆπ“‰π‘’π“‡ 𝒸𝒽𝒾𝑒𝒻 πŸŽ€ 🐁
Old World Underground
πŸ‘‘
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
🎩
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»πŸ₯“πŸ’»
generally what type of overall health and longevity did you encounter in the Philippine's jungle?
It was good to the point that there were old people whose age was unknown. One man they claimed was probably 120. He would walk up and down a hill, that was more like a mountain, every day for no specific reason.

The other thing that was amazing was that very old (80s-90s) men would have new wives and have children. They had polygamy and more women than men, so. Men die in stupid ways, like falling off cliffs, or stabbing each other (normally non-violent, but there were infidelity-related murders not irregularly). Also men would be the ones to travel to town, which would involve some part of a motorcycle journey through crazy terrain, and a lot of people died doing that.

did they make their own shotgun shells too?
No, and the jungle people didn't make the guns themselves, they were just locally made in machine shops. I'd been to several of them.
collagen in beef hides is pretty good in my coffee, did you cut the hides into stripes and boil it? fry it? how did you eat the hides? or was that used for shoes?

and was there a lot of earth grounding bare-feet or whitemans rubber souled shoes?
There are no cows. There are potentially oxen, which is horrible meat, and they're used as work animals. They do eat them eventually, but it's horrible meat.

The primary source of food is chicken, and on special occasions, they will roast a domestic pig (or a boar, if they ever get one, which is rare).

They don't usually wear shoes. The only shoes anyone in the third world wears are flipflops, as an almost total rule, unless they're working in some Western style establishment. But the flip flops are really only used for the asphalt in cities. The soles of your feet will get really leathery, naturally.

Trying to snap back on topic, what are your thoughts on StarLink, Elon Musk's satellite internet service? I've been thinking about applying for it as my internet is terrible.
I know of it but haven't been following it. I have never heard of satellite internet being for anything other than like, sending an email from the middle of a desert or something, so I don't really know where he's going with it.
I have things in my past that are unsavory and embarrassing.
The fact some of yours are on the interwebs is truly unfortunate.
I don't really think it's that unfortunate.

Especially given that I did a play by play online at the time, it isn't really like "digging up the past." It's just something that every few years or whatever, someone thinks is some hidden thing I tried to cover up.

I understand that the story in the OP could be confusing to someone, I guess, if they weren't really familiar with this kind of information, so maybe it's easier to just go with "we were all leftists before!", but I think the truth is more interesting.

I guess it's especially so given that more people have come around to asking this question about technology. I wish there was more information on it, because telling someone to read The Technological Society is really a big ask, and most people couldn't manage it. It's the kind of thing where you regularly have to keep reading the same sentence over to understand it. I mean, it's not Frankfurt School tier, but it is very difficult material.

Ultimately though, there just isn't any real solution to the problem, other than an authoritarian government that regulates technology. Ludditism isn't plausible.
 

Paul Harrell

But who isn't an unhinged asshole these days?
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
Escaped True Master
Thank you for that personal journey.
I have things in my past that are unsavory and embarrassing.
The fact some of yours are on the interwebs is truly unfortunate.
Your writing in the past year has gotten truly sublime. Like @Paul Harrell I used to visit that occidental losers site.
Last year at the beginning of this hoax when everything was shut down and locked down the fat loser was bragging about going fishing with his buddies while on his site he was going into histrionics about the deadly China virus. I found that stomach turning.
@Andrew Anglin at that time was a voice of reason which was helpful.
Keep writing, read the Bible, and trust Jesus with everything.
To be clear I never actually read that occidental whatever. I just saw it linked somewhere (maybe a DS article) and clicked through the site reading some of his "I hate Anglin" stuff. He writes like an idiot and doesn't make much of a compelling case for anything. I did listen to TRS for awhile but in my defense they used to be funny, and their refusal to publicly address anything made it difficult to know what was unfolding behind the scenes without reading DS.
 

Paul Harrell

But who isn't an unhinged asshole these days?
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’πŸ‹πŸ»
Escaped True Master
I know of it but haven't been following it. I have never heard of satellite internet being for anything other than like, sending an email from the middle of a desert or something, so I don't really know where he's going with it.
it's supposed to be more reliable and much cheaper than traditional satellite internet. There have been signs up everywhere advertising fast satellite internet in the areas where shit DSL is the only option... The problem is these providers charge outrageous rates for capped data plans (hundreds a month for less than 50gb).
Star link runs about 100 a month for speeds supposedly 10x faster than anything available in huge parts of my state. Not having high speed internet is very limiting in the current year and I think star link could be a real game changer for many. I'm seeing a lot of glowing reviews for the speed and reliability even though it's still in beta.
 

Little Shitpost Buddha

Hortler Dod :(
Cave Beast
🐸 Citizen of the Internet 🐸
β°β˜•πŸš¬πŸš½πŸšΏπŸͺ’
The thinking and the goal was that if white people did not exist to create technology, other races would remain living in a state of harmony with nature, simply because they do not have the intelligence or the drive to build this technology.
This reminded me of that typical iteration of the 'noble savage' myth, the essay 'For America to Live Europe Must Die' that many primitivists adopted as their gospel, which was in the end, nothing but another piece oppression porn. What these people don't get is that at the bottom of technology is ultimately organization. Even if Europeans voluntarily destroyed their technology, which every day seems more desirable, they would still retain their capacity for organizing themselves which is part of their DNA. And hence, Amerinds would still fare no better against the Caucasian man.


Question:

What's your take on radical environmentalism, i.e. Linkola?
 
Top